Author Archives: Arleigh

Anime You Should Be Watching: Macross Plus

Posted on by Arleigh

“Life without pain isn’t real life!” — Isamu Dyson

Macross Plus is a landmark anime OVA series from 1994 that continues to resonate with both newcomers and longtime fans of the genre. It stands out within the larger Macross franchise—one of the most influential in anime history—that includes various series beginning with the original Super Dimension Fortress Macross in the early 1980s. While Macross Plus is just one of several entries under this umbrella, it serves as a crucial bridge between the earlier incarnation of the series produced during the 1980s and the more modern take that the franchise would eventually develop in the late 1990s and into the 2000s. This OVA represents a stylistic and thematic evolution that helped transition the series from its original space opera roots into a more mature, complex narrative form that appeals to contemporary audiences.

Set decades after the destructive war between humanity and the alien Zentradi featured in the original series, Macross Plus takes place in the year 2040 where the UN Spacy conducts flight trials on a remote planet to select the next generation of Variable Fighters. The story revolves around Isamu Dyson, a cocky and passionate pilot; Guld Goa Bowman, his calm and talented rival who is revealed to be a Zentradi/human hybrid; and Myung Fang Lone, a woman emotionally entangled with both men and managing the artificially intelligent holographic idol Sharon Apple. The narrative explores themes of rivalry, friendship, human connection, and emotional tension with nuance and depth, distinguishing it within the franchise and offering a compelling experience for both newcomers and longtime fans.

Viewers can experience Macross Plus either as a four-episode OVA or through the re-edited movie version titled Macross Plus: Movie Edition. The movie version condenses the original four episodes into a much shorter runtime, around 115 minutes, with certain scenes expanded, some new scenes added, and others shortened or removed entirely. While the movie includes roughly 20 minutes of new or alternate footage, it retains much of the OVA’s original material. The film format emphasizes a more cinematic presentation and features a widescreen format, contrasting the original OVA’s 1.37 aspect ratio. However, while the movie streamlines some narrative aspects and adds a few striking sequences, some fans feel the OVA’s longer runtime allows for richer character development and storytelling depth. Both versions have their merits, with many recommending watching the OVA first to appreciate the fuller experience before exploring the movie edition.

One of Macross Plus’s standout features is its animation quality, especially remarkable for a mid-1990s production. The series blends traditional hand-drawn artistry with pioneering computer graphics, particularly in its spectacular aerial dogfight sequences featuring transforming fighter jets. These dynamic battle scenes convey a vivid sense of speed and intensity, demonstrating a level of technical sophistication that remains impressive today. Though some fans note minor differences in character design from Haruhiko Mikimoto’s original work, the visual impact overall is striking and immersive, providing a thrilling experience for newcomers and a nostalgic appreciation for veteran viewers.

Integral to the anime’s atmosphere is its unforgettable soundtrack, composed by the legendary Yoko Kanno. Her wide-ranging score—from haunting melodies to energetic action themes—perfectly complements the show’s tonal shifts. While “Voices,” performed by Akino Arai, is the song most fans distinctly remember and cherish for encapsulating the emotional core of the series, the rest of the soundtrack stands out as excellent in its own right. Notably, the tracks tied to the Sharon Apple AI subplot add an additional layer of mood and narrative depth. The song “Information High,” performed by Sharon Apple, is particularly praised for its ethereal, electronic style that perfectly captures the AI’s hypnotic and otherworldly presence in the story. This track complements the themes of technology, identity, and artificial emotion explored through Sharon Apple’s character, enhancing the viewer’s immersion in the high-tech world of Macross Plus.

Another rarity in the anime world that Macross Plus represents is its highly regarded English-language dub. Unlike many anime dubs that face criticism, the Macross Plus English dub is considered excellent by fans and critics alike. One notable factor is the casting of a younger Bryan Cranston (before his Breaking Bad fame) as the voice of Isamu Dyson. His performance brings genuine energy and nuance to the role, contributing to the dub’s reputation as a quality adaptation worthy of both newcomers who prefer English audio and longtime fans who appreciate a well-executed dub.

A core thematic insight in Macross Plus lies in its exploration of technology, especially artificial intelligence, highlighting how even advanced AI must learn from humans as templates, inevitably influencing its behavior. Sharon Apple, the AI pop star and central figure of the subplot, cannot authentically generate emotion on her own. Instead, she relies on the emotional input provided by Myung Fang Lone, her producer and the emotional source behind Sharon’s performances. This dependency underlines a profound implication: true sentience and emotional authenticity in AI require imitation and absorption of human feelings, experience, and behavior. Consequently, Sharon’s increasingly autonomous actions become shaped by the complex and sometimes conflicted emotional landscape of the humans around her, illustrating how AI, while synthetic, is ultimately tied to the human condition and its imperfections. The series presents this relationship critically, showing both the potential and danger of AI learning and evolving from human templates, culminating in Sharon’s struggle to assert an identity that is both alien and deeply rooted in human emotions.

Importantly, Macross Plus is recognized as the first official sequel to the original Macross series by its creator Shoji Kawamori. The earlier Macross II was later retconned by Kawamori as an alternate reality or parallel world separate from the main timeline. This status cements Macross Plus as the canonical continuation of the original saga, reinforcing its significance within the franchise and its role in guiding Macross’s future directions.

The narrative structure—whether experienced as the OVA’s four episodes or the condensed movie version—strikes a balance between introspective character moments and exhilarating mech combat, keeping viewers engaged while allowing emotional depth to unfold. Though some supporting characters receive limited development and the antagonist can seem somewhat one-dimensional, these elements do not detract significantly from the memorable storytelling, animation, and thematic richness.

For newcomers, Macross Plus serves as a powerful introduction to anime that blends sophisticated storytelling, technical artistry, and philosophical inquiry. For veterans, it offers a compelling revisit to a milestone work that elegantly bridges the franchise’s classic roots and modern evolution.

Macross Plus holds a revered place within the Macross franchise and the wider anime landscape for several reasons. It was pioneering in its integration of traditional cel animation with early computer-generated imagery (CGI), setting a precedent for the increasing use of digital effects in anime. This blend allowed for its visually stunning aerial combat sequences which remain influential in mecha animation.

The series also marked the start of a significant collaboration between director Shinichirō Watanabe and composer Yoko Kanno, whose work on Macross Plus would lead to iconic projects such as Cowboy Bebop. The soundtrack’s genre-spanning style influenced how music could serve as a narrative force in anime, intertwining with story and character development rather than merely accompanying visuals.

Narratively, Macross Plus helped reaffirm the franchise’s thematic core—the interplay of love, war, and music—while pushing it toward more mature and psychological storytelling, expanding the appeal beyond traditional mecha fans. Its exploration of AI and human emotion was ahead of its time, posing philosophical questions still relevant in today’s discussions about technology and identity.

The excellent English dub, featuring talents like Bryan Cranston, contributed to its international acclaim, helping it become a gateway series for many Western viewers into the Macross universe and anime more broadly.

Its legacy continues not only through ongoing Macross installments but also in manga adaptations and video game tie-ins, as well as in inspiring countless mecha and sci-fi creators. To this day, Macross Plus is frequently cited as a high watermark of 1990s anime, a timeless fusion of innovative animation, memorable music, and complex, emotionally resonant storytelling that helped shape the trajectory of anime as a global medium.

Anime You Should Be Watching

Song of the Day: Paint It Black (The Rolling Stones)

Posted on by Arleigh

You ever notice how “Paint It Black” doesn’t really start so much as it unfolds—that strange sitar riff creeping in like a bad dream you can’t quite shake? The Stones captured something that feels less like heartbreak and more like a total emotional blackout. The sound is restless, paranoid even, like someone pacing around inside their own thoughts at 3 a.m. That’s what makes it such a sharp symbol of depression: it’s not just sadness, it’s this all-consuming fog where color, joy, and even meaning itself disappear.

The thing that always strikes me is how the song turns that private darkness into a worldview. The singer doesn’t only feel grief—he wants the whole world to match how he feels inside. That line between self and everything else completely breaks down. You can hear it in the drumming, that pounding rhythm chasing itself in circles, or the sitar’s looping melody that never resolves. It’s like he’s trapped in motion, unable to stop thinking or feeling, stuck in a spiral that makes sense only to him. It’s haunting because it sounds familiar to anyone who’s been that low.

And that’s why, even decades later, “Paint It Black” still feels so alive—so uncomfortably modern. Underneath the 60s cool, it taps into that quiet nihilism a lot of people still wrestle with today: the idea that maybe there’s nothing left worth looking at, so you might as well black it all out. But there’s something cathartic in that honesty. The song doesn’t try to fix anything or offer redemption; it just sits in the darkness. And sometimes, that’s what makes it hit harder than any happy ending could.

Paint It Black

I see a red door
And I want it painted black
No colors anymore
I want them to turn black

I see the girls walk by
Dressed in their summer clothes
I have to turn my head
Until my darkness goes

I see a line of cars
And they’re all painted black
With flowers and my love
Both never to come back

I’ve seen people turn their heads
And quickly look away
Like a newborn baby
It just happens everyday

I look inside myself
And see my heart is black
I see my red door
I must have it painted black

Maybe then, I’ll fade away
And not have to face the facts
It’s not easy facing up
When your whole world is black

No more will my green sea
Go turn a deeper blue
I could not foresee this thing
Happening to you

If I look hard enough
Into the setting sun
My love will laugh with me
Before the morning comes

I see a red door
And I want it painted black
No colors anymore
I want them to turn black

I see the girls walk by
Dressed in their summer clothes
I have to turn my head
Until my darkness goes

I wanna see it painted
Painted black
Black as night
Black as coal
I wanna see the sun
Blotted out from the sky
I wanna see it painted, painted, painted
Painted black, yeah

Review: Extraction 2 (dir. by Sam Hargrave)

Posted on by Arleigh

“I will not stop.” — Tyler Rake

Extraction 2 drops you right into the thick of things, cranking the intensity way past the first film. To quickly recap, the original Extraction introduced Tyler Rake, a gritty mercenary with a troubled past played with undeniable grit by Chris Harmsworth. The story was simple but effective—a high-stakes rescue of a kidnapped boy in Dhaka, Bangladesh, filled with edge-of-your-seat action and those now-iconic, almost balletic long-take fight sequences. It was raw, realistic, and emotionally grounded. Harmsworth’s portrayal anchored the chaos in human vulnerability, helping the film stand out from the typical action fare.

Now, the sequel’s aim is clear—it wants to go bigger, bloodier, and more relentless, and it pulls that off in many ways. The standout here is definitely the action choreography. Sam Hargrave, the director, really flexes his muscle with several jaw-dropping sequences, especially a breathtaking 21-minute continuous take that makes you feel like you’re running alongside Rake, dodging bullets and throwing punches in real time. It’s an impressive technical feat but, more importantly, it’s incredibly immersive. The fights have that gritty realism where each blow counts, and the camera work lets you see every tense moment clearly instead of hiding behind shaky cuts.

Chris Hemsworth, once again, owns the role. This time around, you can see a bit more of the toll the mercenary life has taken on Rake. Hemsworth brings a subtle layer of weariness mixed with fierce determination. His physicality is on full display—he’s convincing in those brutal hand-to-hand combats without ever feeling like a stuntman stand-in. He does it all, and it’s clear he’s not just punching air; this is a man fighting for something beyond just survival. The emotional beats land a bit more naturally this time around, helped by Hemsworth’s grounded performance, which balances the nonstop action with moments of quiet reflection.

Visually, the film is a significant step up. The settings shift from humid, congested streets to icy, oppressive Georgia, and the cinematography makes the most of this change. The chilly, bleak palette fits perfectly with the film’s mood—harsh, unforgiving, and tense. The camera work is bold yet measured; it takes its time to show us the fights fully, letting the choreography breathe without rushing or confusing the viewer. This clarity turns the action scenes into mini-masterpieces, where every movement, every shot, and every punch feels deliberate and impactful.

That said, not everything clicks perfectly. The plot plays it safe with familiar revenge and rescue-mission beats, and the supporting characters don’t get much development beyond their utility to the story. Golshifteh Farahani steals a few scenes as Nik, adding fresh energy and complexity as a tough and capable ally, but others around her mainly exist to get the body count up. There’s a formulaic feel to the storyline—with plenty of high-stakes tension but little in the way of surprise. If you go in looking for deep storytelling or rich character arcs, you might be left wanting.

The film truly embraces the “bigger is better” mantra, and in many ways, it pays off spectacularly with larger, more intricate action sequences and expanded scale. This escalation brings a fuller, more thrilling spectacle that keeps you hooked from start to finish. However, this increase in scope leads to a trade-off: the narrative feels more convoluted and sometimes weighed down by its own ambition. The plot introduces multiple new characters and intersecting agendas, which lengthens the storyline unnecessarily and complicates what could have been a more straightforward mission. This convolution makes the story not only more formulaic but also harder to follow, detracting from the lean storytelling charm that made the first movie so effective.

Tone-wise, the movie trades some of the first film’s grounded grit for a flashier, more stylized look and feel. Some sequences stretch believability—Rake’s near-indestructibility and certain stunt setups can pull you out of the moment. Still, if you’re willing to accept that and enjoy the ride, the movie delivers on adrenaline and spectacle in full force.

One of the most refreshing things about Extraction 2 is how well it balances raw, physical combat with moments of emotional depth. Between the intense fight scenes, there are small windows into who Tyler Rake is and what drives him. These touches give the film a heartbeat beneath all the explosions and punches. Rake is no cookie-cutter action hero; he’s a broken man clawing his way toward redemption, and that gives the film a surprising amount of emotional weight for a movie mainly about violence and chaos.

Ultimately, Extraction 2 isn’t reinventing the wheel, but it doesn’t need to. It knows its audience and delivers exactly what it promises: high-octane, impeccably executed action sequences tied together by a thread of humanity. Hemsworth’s portrayal elevates it beyond just a flashy romp, lending it a gritty soul. The villains feel suitably menacing, and the stakes are convincingly high, which keeps the tension ticking throughout.

If you loved the first Extraction for its mix of brutal realism and emotional punch, the sequel will feel familiar but amplified—more intense, more expansive, and a bit louder. If you’re new to the series, Extraction 2 still stands solid on its own as a showcase of what well-choreographed action cinema looks like today—raw, precise, and emotionally resonant with just enough story to keep you invested without dragging you down.

In short, Extraction 2 is a wild, thrilling ride with a surprisingly human heart beating beneath all the chaos. It’s a film that knows how to entertain, showcasing Chris Harmsworth at his physical and emotional best and proving that action movies can still push creative boundaries while keeping viewers hooked. The movie brings bigger and bolder set pieces that truly live up to the “bigger is better” slogan, but this comes at the cost of making the plot more convoluted and overly complicated than it needed to be. While the intricate story layers may strain some viewers, the explosive action and solid performances make it a must-watch for any fan of visceral, edge-of-your-seat thrillers. If you want a no-nonsense blockbuster with a pulse, Extraction 2 delivers in spades.

Review: Extraction (dir. by Sam Hargrave)

Posted on by Arleigh

“Move fast. Stay low.” — Tyler Rake

Extraction (2020) is an action film directed by Sam Hargrave and written by Joe Russo, centering on a high-stakes rescue mission led by Chris Hemsworth’s character, Tyler Rake. The story comes from the graphic novel Ciudad, following Rake, a hardened mercenary tasked with rescuing Ovi Mahajan—the kidnapped teenage son of a Mumbai drug lord—from a rival gang in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

The biggest highlight of the film is undoubtedly the action. Sam Hargrave’s background as a stuntman and stunt coordinator heavily shapes the film’s visceral, grounded fight scenes and chase sequences. Before directing Extraction, Hargrave worked extensively in Hollywood, doubling for Chris Evans as Captain America in several Marvel movies like Winter Soldier and Endgame, and choreographing stunts for The Avengers, Pirates of the Caribbean, and The Hunger Games. This experience shows in the film’s impressive physicality and well-structured action set pieces.

One of the film’s standout moments is a roughly 15-minute continuous shot that follows Rake through escalating fights, car chases, and shoots without cuts, putting the audience right in the middle of the chaos. Cinematographer Newton Thomas Sigel maintains great clarity during this complex sequence, making it easy to follow the action without losing tension or momentum.

Chris Hemsworth’s Tyler Rake is a mix of toughness and quiet emotion. While Rake is the typical stoic, skilled mercenary with a haunting past, Hemsworth brings enough charisma and subtlety to keep him interesting. Rudhraksh Jaiswal’s Ovi balances vulnerability and resilience, and their relationship adds some emotional depth to an otherwise action-heavy film.

The setting of Dhaka plays a significant role in creating tension. The crowded streets and claustrophobic urban spaces add a feeling of danger and urgency. The production design and score contribute to this gritty atmosphere, making the world feel lived-in and tense.

Violence in Extraction is brutal and unflinching, not shying away from the grim realities of its story. The R rating is earned through graphic fights, gun battles, and some harsh moments involving bystanders, including children. This unrelenting approach to violence adds a raw edge to the film but can also feel overwhelming at times.

However, the movie’s major drawback comes from its story and character development, which are fairly thin and formulaic. The plot is straightforward: a mercenary protecting a kidnapped kid while fighting off enemies. Most of the supporting characters are underdeveloped, with the villain Amir portrayed as a one-dimensional bad guy without much backstory or nuance. Although Randeep Hooda’s character Saju adds some tension and complexity, other roles feel functional rather than memorable.

The film attempts to add emotional weight through Rake and Ovi’s bond, but the effort sometimes falls flat. Key moments meant to build character feels like typical exposition, and some plot points are rushed or underexplored. A subplot involving David Harbour’s character feels tacked on and doesn’t quite fit into the narrative flow.

Pacing also hinders the film, especially in the middle act, where the story slows down and struggles to balance action with character moments. This section can feel tedious compared to the rest of the film’s adrenaline-fueled sequences.

The ending, while action-packed and satisfying in terms of spectacle, also features a somewhat questionable twist and a final shot that feels like a cheat, leaving some ambiguity that may frustrate viewers seeking clear resolution.

In summary, Extraction delivers on what fans of intense, well-executed action expect. It’s a showcase for Hargrave’s stunt expertise and Hemsworth’s physical performance but falls short when it comes to storytelling and character depth. The film is a gripping, high-energy ride with brutal, creative fight and chase scenes—but if you’re looking for a nuanced plot or fully fleshed-out characters, it’s lacking. Fans of pure action films like John Wick or The Raid will find much to enjoy here, but others may find the story too simplistic and the constant violence numbing over time.

Review: Blood Diamond (dir. by Ed Zwick)

Posted on by Arleigh

“Sometimes I wonder… will God ever forgive us for what we’ve done to each other? Then I look around and I realize, God left this place a long time ago.” — Danny Archer

Edward Zwick’s 2006 film Blood Diamond is one of those big Hollywood productions that tries to be both a gritty, globe-trotting thriller and a politically conscious indictment of the diamond trade’s role in African civil wars. Set in Sierra Leone during the 1990s, it stars Leonardo DiCaprio as Danny Archer, a Rhodesian mercenary and diamond smuggler, and Djimon Hounsou as Solomon Vandy, a fisherman torn from his family by rebels and forced into brutal diamond mining. Rounding out the leads is Jennifer Connelly as Maddy Bowen, a tenacious reporter determined to expose the atrocities fueling the global supply of conflict diamonds. The film is ambitious, harrowing, and, at times, as slickly entertaining as it is bluntly didactic. But like many socially minded blockbusters, it walks a tightrope between genuine drama and Hollywood sensationalism.

The story kicks off with a bang—literally—as Solomon’s village is raided by Revolutionary United Front militants, a moment that quickly plunges the viewer into Sierra Leone’s chaotic civil war. Solomon’s family is fragmented: he ends up a slave at a rebel-run mining camp, his son is eventually brainwashed into a child soldier, and his wife flees for safety. Meanwhile, DiCaprio’s Archer lands in jail after a failed smuggling run—which sets the two men on a collision course. Archer learns of Solomon’s discovery of an enormous, rare pink diamond—a stone that could mean escape or redemption for both men but is a magnet for greed, violence, and compromise. Their uneasy partnership with Maddy Bowen, who’s chasing a story, adds layers as their individual motives collide and evolve.

The movie doesn’t shy away from illustrating the devastating effects of the diamond trade—child soldiers, forced labor, mass displacement, and political corruption. While most of the on-screen violence is handled to maximize emotional punch, it never lets the viewer forget the real-world stakes of the Blood Diamond narrative. The film ultimately points viewers toward the establishment of the Kimberley Process—a set of international regulations designed to combat the illicit diamond trade.

A lot of the film’s emotional weight lands on DiCaprio and Hounsou, and for good reason. Leonardo DiCaprio nabs the complex role of Danny Archer with a layered performance and goes the extra mile by working hard on the Zimbabwean (Rhodesian) accent. While accents in film can be divisive, DiCaprio immersed himself deeply, working with dialect coaches and spending time with people from the region to best capture the regional nuances. Although some viewers and critics felt the accent was uneven or shifted at points, many others praised him for nailing this challenging and rare dialect. For an American actor to convincingly embody a mercenary with roots in that part of the world is no small feat. DiCaprio’s commitment brings credibility to Archer’s character, who is morally ambiguous but immensely human.

Djimon Hounsou, playing Solomon Vandy, serves as the emotional core and grounding presence of the film. His portrayal of a man torn apart by civil war, who fights desperately to reclaim his family, is heartbreaking and physically compelling. Their scenes together create genuine tension, as trust is both scarce and necessary for survival. Jennifer Connelly’s Maddy Bowen, while less fleshed out, brings determination and serves as the moral compass driving the film’s exposé of conflict diamonds.

Director Edward Zwick has a way of blending spectacle with raw storytelling. The action sequences, especially the firefights and escapes, feel intense and immersive. The cinematography captures the lush, dangerous landscape of Sierra Leone vividly, contrasting beauty with brutality. Some technical aspects do show their age—like certain digital effects that can feel artificial—but these don’t significantly dampen the overall experience. The soundtrack by James Newton Howard underscores the drama without veering into heavy-handed territory.

Blood Diamond scores high on several fronts. The performances by DiCaprio and Hounsou are standout elements, their evolving relationship carrying the film’s emotional heft. The pulse-pounding action sequences inject thrills while highlighting the chaos of civil war. Perhaps most importantly, the movie exposes the grim realities behind the glittering allure of diamonds, educating audiences about child soldiers, forced labor, and the complicity of international markets in perpetuating violence. Though it sometimes leans into melodrama and moralizing dialogue, the film’s commitment to its message is fairly unambiguous and impactful.

That said, the film sometimes succumbs to the trappings of big-budget Hollywood storytelling. The plot can feel overly convenient, with coincidences and resolutions that stretch credibility. Supporting characters, aside from the leads, are underdeveloped, mainly functioning as plot devices. Dialogue can at times be heavy-handed, particularly in the final act where scenes verge on preachy. Some narrative contrivances—like the recovery and passing of the pink diamond—can feel forced even in a tense, action-driven context. On the technical side, a few CGI moments fail to hold up under scrutiny, but these are minor irritants in an otherwise immersive film.

An important and unavoidable observation about Blood Diamond is how, like many of Edward Zwick’s previous action-dramas, it leans heavily into the “white savior” trope, if not outright embodying it. This trope centers a white protagonist—in this case, Danny Archer—who becomes the crucial figure in the salvation or redemption of non-white characters and communities. While the film sheds light on the horrors and complexity of Sierra Leone’s civil war and the conflict diamond trade, the narrative perspective and moral center overwhelmingly revolve around Archer’s personal journey from cynical mercenary to reluctant hero. The African characters, though vital and powerful especially through Hounsou’s Solomon, are often cast in more reactive roles, with Archer positioned as the key agent for change. The film also features a white journalist, Maddy Bowen, reinforcing this pattern.

Zwick’s leanings toward this trope are not new or isolated. His earlier films Glory (1989) and The Last Samurai (2003) also engage with the white savior narrative. Glory, a Civil War epic about the 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment, tells a historically significant story but largely centers on Colonel Robert Gould Shaw, a white officer played by Matthew Broderick, as the story’s main emotional and narrative anchor. The film has been noted for respectfully addressing racism and heroism but still revolves around Shaw’s perspective and sacrifice as a key redemptive figure for the African American soldiers. The Last Samurai similarly places Tom Cruise’s character, an American military advisor, at the heart of a narrative about Japanese samurai culture and resistance, blending cultural appreciation with the problematic trope of the white outsider who becomes indispensable to a non-white community’s fate.

This approach, familiar in Hollywood, walks the line between broad audience engagement and ethical storytelling. Zwick’s films often balance studio and audience expectations with a desire to tell compelling stories about marginalized communities. Yet inevitably, this framing simplifies complex histories and contributes to critiques that such films center whiteness and diminish the agency of non-white characters.

Casually speaking, Blood Diamond is not subtle, but that directness is part of its appeal. For viewers looking for a gripping action drama with strong performances and an ethical core, it delivers. It entertains while providing a sobering look at the high cost of luxury goods. DiCaprio’s portrayal of Danny Archer, complete with an authentically worked-on accent from the region, puts to rest doubts about his action lead capabilities. Hounsou’s performance lingers emotionally, especially in scenes grappling with the trauma of child soldiering. The violence depicted is raw and unvarnished, contributing to a visceral sense of the film’s urgent themes.

Running for about two hours and 23 minutes, the film has plenty of time to develop its complex story and deliver tense action sequences without feeling rushed or padded. Ultimately, Blood Diamond is an effective historical thriller that balances high stakes and moral urgency. While it’s not nuanced in every aspect and occasionally tips into cliché and convenience, it makes a strong case for itself beyond mere entertainment. Whether you’re interested in history, action, or the human stories behind the diamond trade, this film offers a thought-provoking, emotionally resonant experience. Leonardo DiCaprio’s dedication to portraying a Rhodesian mercenary authentically, especially through his accent work, is a highlight that complements the film’s broader narrative ambitions.

4 Shots from 4 Anime: Mecha Edition

Posted on by Arleigh

Mecha: The name derives from a shortening of the English words “mechanism” or “mechanical” into the Japanese “mecha”

Last time I chose 4 shots from some chosen anime I went the isekai route. This time around I have chosen four shots from some of the more popular and well-received anime of the mecha variety.

This genre of anime has been around as far back as the 1940’s with earliest known mecha-related work being the 1940 manga “Electric Octopus” (Denki Dako). Yet, the subgenre of mecha as we we know of it today as the “super robot” was with the landmark anime from 1972 with Go Nagai’s “Mazinger Z.” This series would establish the many tropes and baseline rules of what mecha has become and will continue to be.

So, here are four shots from four very good to great mecha anime that fans new and old has watched at least once.

Mobile Suit Gundam 00 (dir. by Seiji Mizushima)
Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann (dir. by Hiroyuki Imaishi)
Macross Plus (dir. by Shinichirō Watanabe)
Neon Genesis Evangelion (dir. by Hideaki Anno)

Song of the Day: Fell on Black Days (by Soundgarden)

Posted on by Arleigh

As the latest “Song of the Day,” Soundgarden’s Fell on Black Days stands out as one of Chris Cornell’s most hauntingly introspective songs. It captures that quiet terror of realizing, almost suddenly, that life has slipped into a dark space without a clear cause. The lyrics don’t dramatize depression or despair—they circle it, giving voice to numb reflection rather than clear tragedy. Cornell doesn’t sing from a place of theatrical pain but introspective confusion, which makes it all the more relatable: that sense of waking up one day and finding that something within has gone dim.

Cornell’s vocal performance is the emotional backbone of the song. His delivery is restrained at first, almost conversational, carrying that familiar mix of grit and vulnerability that made his voice so magnetic. As the song builds, the tension burns through his tone—he never screams, but you feel the anguish vibrating at the edges. It’s that ability to stay melodic while channeling raw feeling that separates him from many of his grunge-era peers. You can hear both power and exhaustion inhabiting the same breath.

Musically, Fell on Black Days moves with a slow, uneasy groove that fits the song’s mood of quiet dread. Instead of following a typical rock rhythm, it flows a little off-kilter, giving it that feeling of imbalance Cornell describes in the lyrics. The guitars are thick and moody but not overly heavy, letting the vocals breathe. Thayil’s riffing feels more like a shadow behind the melody, while the bass and drums give it a tired, rolling heartbeat. It’s less about flashy playing and more about atmosphere—a sound that matches the weight of realizing your life has turned darker without you noticing.

Fell on Black Days

Whatsoever I’ve feared has come to life
And whatsoever I’ve fought off became my life
Just when everyday seemed to greet me with a smile
Sunspots have faded and now I’m doing time

Now I’m doing time
‘Cause I fell on black days
I fell on black days

Whomsoever I’ve cured I’ve sickened now
And whomsoever I’ve cradled I’ve put you down
I’m a search light soul they say
But I can’t see it in the night
I’m only faking when I get it right
When I get it right
‘Cause I fell on black days
I fell on black days

How would I know
That this could be my fate
How would I know
That this could be my fate, uh yeah

What you wanted to see good has made you blind
And what you wanted to be yours has made it mine
So don’t you lock up something that you wanted to see fly
Hands are for shaking not tying

No, not tying
I sure don’t mind a change
I sure don’t mind a change
Yeah, I sure don’t mind
Sure don’t mind a change
I sure don’t mind a change

‘Cause I fell on black days
I fell on black days

How would I know
That this could be my fate
How would I know
That this could be my fate

How would I know
That this could be my fate
How would I know
That this could be my fate

I sure don’t mind a change

Book Review: Corporate Warriors (by P.W. Singer)

Posted on by Arleigh

“The privatization of warfare allows startling new capabilities and efficiencies in the ways that war is carried out. At the same time, however, the entrance of the profit motive onto the battlefield raises a series of troubling questions—for democracy, for ethics, for law, for human rights, and for national security.” — P.W. Singer

P.W. Singer’s Corporate Warriors is one of the most important books about the rise of private military companies, or PMCs—businesses that sell military and security services for profit. Singer makes it clear that this is not a brand-new concept. As long as humans have fought wars, there have been soldiers willing to fight for whoever pays them. Ancient mercenaries fought for gold just as modern ones fight for governments, corporations, and even wealthy individuals. What makes today’s version different is how organized and professional these groups have become. They now look and operate like big international businesses, complete with CEOs, contracts, shareholders, and company logos.

Singer argues that these firms are now a permanent feature of modern warfare. Instead of ragtag mercenaries, many private contractors are highly trained professionals offering specialized skills that national militaries either can’t provide or don’t want to keep on the payroll full time. Governments and companies rely on them because they can move quickly, fill skill gaps, and handle dangerous or politically sensitive work. Still, that doesn’t mean they come without serious problems. Singer’s main concern is how much military power is now being handled by people who technically aren’t soldiers and don’t always fall under military law.

In the book, Singer sorts modern PMCs into three main categories. First are the “provider” companies like the South African firm Executive Outcomes, which became famous in the 1990s for fighting on the ground in places like Angola and Sierra Leone. These companies bring in their own troops, equipment, and training programs, often taking on direct combat roles. Next are “consulting” firms such as Military Professional Resources Inc. (MPRI), an American company that employs retired generals and officers to train and advise foreign militaries. The third kind includes “support” firms such as Halliburton’s subsidiary KBR, which focuses on logistics, food, construction, and base operations. These companies don’t fight but keep everything else running so that soldiers can focus on combat.

All three types share something in common: they are run like global corporations. They make money through contracts, report to shareholders, and market themselves as professional service providers. Singer notes that even major multinational companies now use PMCs for everything from executive protection to negotiations with risky foreign governments. Governments, especially the United States and its allies, also rely heavily on these firms to handle noncombat work—guarding bases, moving supplies, and securing reconstruction projects. This trend, according to Singer, represents a major shift in how warfare is organized.

The biggest concern is accountability. Private contractors don’t always fall under the same legal rules as soldiers. They operate in what Singer calls a “gray zone,” where war crimes or abuses can occur without clear consequences. One striking example came in 2004 when four American contractors working for Blackwater were ambushed and killed in Fallujah, Iraq. The brutal event shocked the public and revealed how central private contractors had become to America’s military presence there. Later incidents, like those involving private interrogators at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, further blurred the lines between government responsibility and outsourced violence.

Singer’s warning is that handing so much military work to private companies risks separating war from national accountability. If a contractor commits a crime, who is responsible—the company, the client government, or the individual employee? When fighting becomes a business, the incentive to keep costs low and profits high can make ethics and oversight an afterthought.

Events since the book’s release have proven many of Singer’s points, especially the rise and collapse of Russia’s Wagner Group. Led by Yevgeny Prigozhin, Wagner became one of the most dangerous and talked-about private armies in the world. Unlike most Western firms, it operated under direct government influence while pretending to be independent. Wagner first gained attention during Russia’s 2014 invasion of Ukraine, then expanded into conflicts in Syria, Libya, and parts of Africa. The company didn’t just fight wars—it also ran businesses, gained control over mines, and seized energy resources. In short, it blended war and profit in a way that gave Russia global reach without official military involvement.

Wagner also showed how dangerous this model can be. Its fighters were accused of widespread brutality and war crimes, yet Russia could deny any official connection. And when Prigozhin turned against the Kremlin in mid-2023, leading a short-lived march toward Moscow, the illusion of control collapsed. His death later that year and the redistribution of Wagner’s forces into state-controlled units in 2024 revealed just how unstable such private armies can become. Wagner proved Singer’s central argument: once private forces gain real power, they can threaten not just world order but their own creators.

Other countries have followed this path with their own versions. In China, companies like Frontier Services Group protect overseas projects linked to the Belt and Road Initiative. In Turkey, SADAT provides training and advisory services aligned with the government’s foreign policy. The United Arab Emirates has hired foreign-led PMCs to conduct security operations in Yemen and parts of Africa. These cases show that many governments now use PMCs as unofficial extensions of their militaries and foreign policy tools—cheap, adaptable, and politically flexible.

However, while Singer’s analysis stands out for its clarity and early insight, it is not perfect. One issue is that he treats the rise of PMCs as almost inevitable, a natural result of globalization and free markets. In practice, their growth is far more dependent on political opportunity and state willpower than on market logic alone. Wagner’s collapse, for example, showed that governments can shut down or absorb these forces when they decide they’ve become too independent. Singer also tends to treat PMCs as private commercial actors, but many of today’s most influential groups operate as semi-official arms of the state rather than as free-market enterprises. That distinction matters because it changes how these organizations behave and how accountable they can realistically be.

Another problem is that Singer’s proposed solutions rely on greater regulation and international cooperation—goals that sound reasonable in theory but are difficult to achieve. International law struggles even to manage traditional militaries, so expecting it to control private ones that operate across borders is optimistic. Singer’s faith in future accountability mechanisms somewhat underestimates how fragmented and self-interested international politics can be.

Finally, Singer tends to focus mainly on Western examples, especially the U.S. and U.K., where the PMCs act as corporate service providers. In doing so, he underplays the different way non-Western states, especially Russia, China, and Middle Eastern powers, use them as political instruments rather than for profit. The world of PMCs today is not just about private enterprise—it’s about the blending of private business with government strategy.

Despite these weaknesses, Corporate Warriors remains a landmark work. Singer’s writing is clear, grounded, and unusually balanced for a topic that often invites conspiracy theories or alarmist rhetoric. He helps readers understand not just who these companies are, but how they fit into a global system where armies, corporations, and governments increasingly overlap.

More than twenty years on, the issues he described have only grown. PMCs still operate on nearly every major battlefield, from Eastern Europe to Africa. While governments continue to rely on them, meaningful oversight has not caught up. Even with its flaws, Corporate Warriors is still the best starting point for understanding how war became a global business, and why that shift will keep shaping world politics for decades to come.

Anime You Should Be Watching: Space Battleship Yamato (Uchū Senkan Yamato)

Posted on by Arleigh

 “Duty calls us to give more than our lives; it calls us to give our very souls.” — Capt. Juuzo Okita

Space Battleship Yamato, which aired from 1974 to 1975, is a monumental anime series that shaped the medium’s evolution and continues to resonate deeply with audiences today. Directed by Leiji Matsumoto and produced by Yoshinobu Nishizaki, this 26-episode space opera follows the crew of the Yamato—a resurrected World War II battleship transformed into a spacefaring vessel—on a desperate mission to save an irradiated Earth.

Set in the late 22nd century, Earth has been devastated by radiation from relentless attacks by the alien Gamilas. The surface is inhospitable, and humanity is forced underground. Salvation arrives in the form of a message from the distant planet Iscandar, promising a technology that can cleanse Earth’s radiation. The Yamato, captained by Juuzo Okita and crewed by a band of determined officers including the impetuous but brave Susumu Kodai, must make a perilous journey through hostile space to retrieve this salvation device. Along the way, they face not just merciless enemies but internal struggles, moral dilemmas, and the constant pressure of a ticking clock: the Earth will perish within a year if they fail.

In many ways, Yamato broke the mold for 1970s anime. At a time when most shows were episodic and targeted mainly at children, this series presented serialized storytelling with a complex, continuous narrative arc. This format created genuine dramatic tension and emotional stakes that kept viewers invested episode after episode. While some parts drag with melodrama or technical exposition, the story steadily builds toward a moving climax filled with sacrifice, hope, and bittersweet heroism.

Animation-wise, the series shows its age, with occasionally stiff character movements and production shortcuts like reused backgrounds—typical of 1970s TV budgets. Yet, Leiji Matsumoto’s designs and the Yamato ship itself remain iconic, blending Japan’s wartime history with futuristic sci-fi technology in a compelling aesthetic. The space battles are sweeping and cinematic for the era, supported by Hiroshi Miyagawa’s rousing and emotional musical score, which perfectly balances military pride and somber reflection.

The characters inhabit archetypal but evolving roles. Captain Okita embodies the bushido spirit—noble, self-sacrificing, and burdened by duty—while Kodai matures from impulsive youth to responsible leader molded by loss. Supporting characters bring warmth and conflict, though the presence of women like Yuki Mori reflects dated 1970s gender norms, often limiting them to stereotypical and occasionally objectified roles, which jars against the show’s mature themes.

Beneath its sci-fi veneer, Yamato is a profound meditation on postwar Japanese identity. The revival of the WW2 Yamato as a vessel of salvation symbolizes a desire to transform defeat and shame into hope and renewal. The series navigates the duality of glorifying martial courage while confronting war’s tragic costs. The alien Gamilas are also complex antagonists, featuring honorable figures as well as villains, introducing a nuanced moral landscape rare for its time.

The influence of Space Battleship Yamato on anime is immense and multifaceted. It essentially invented what became the “serious,” serialized sci-fi anime format, making way for legends like Mobile Suit Gundam, which took the treatment of war, politics, and character drama to new levels, and Macross, which played with themes of enemies-turned-allies. Notably, Hideaki Anno, creator of the psychologically rich Neon Genesis Evangelion, cites Yamato as a formative influence, incorporating its emotional and philosophical themes. The series also impacted video games, with elements of its design and story inspiring creators well beyond animation.

The Yamato universe has expanded through numerous sequels, side stories, spin-offs, and remakes. The modern reboot Space Battleship Yamato 2199 is a fan favorite, refreshing the original plot with updated animation and added depth, proving the story’s continued resonance. Other adaptations include OVAs, manga expansions, and a live-action movie, each exploring various facets of the original mythos while bringing Yamato to new audiences.

On the international stage, the series’ English-dubbed adaptation, Star Blazers, was among the first serialized anime to reach Western audiences, planting early seeds for global fandom. Its mature storytelling, serialized arcs, and emotional depth influenced how anime was perceived outside Japan, paving the way for wider acceptance of anime as serious storytelling.

Though the animation style and representations may feel dated now, Yamato’s strengths remain powerful: its epic storytelling, rich themes of sacrifice and renewal, unforgettable characters, and visionary world-building. The show exemplifies how anime can weave thrilling adventure with meaningful thematic exploration, laying groundwork that countless series have followed.

Space Battleship Yamato (1974-1975) stands as a cornerstone of anime history. It transcended its era to become a storytelling template and cultural touchstone whose legacy endures through its influence, spin-offs, and remakes. For fans of sci-fi, anime enthusiasts, and cultural historians alike, it remains an essential watch—a stirring saga of resilience, hope, and the human spirit against cosmic odds.

Anime You Should Be Watching

Anime You Should Be Watching: Akira

Posted on by Arleigh

“The future is not a straight line. It is filled with many crossroads. There must be a future that we can choose for ourselves.” — Kiyoko

Akira is a landmark anime film that has left an indelible mark on both the medium and popular culture, widely regarded as a masterpiece blending dystopian cyberpunk aesthetics with potent social and political themes. Directed by Katsuhiro Otomo and released in 1988, it is an adaptation of Otomo’s own manga of the same name, adding layers of depth from its source material. The film remains a touchstone for its groundbreaking animation, complex narrative, and deep thematic explorations that resonate decades after its release.

At its surface, Akira tells the story of a post-apocalyptic Neo-Tokyo, a city ravaged by past destruction and on the brink of chaos again due to psychic powers unleashed unexpectedly on its streets. The narrative centers around two childhood friends caught in this upheaval: Kaneda, a rebellious gang leader, and Tetsuo, whose sudden acquisition of devastating psychic abilities leads to uncontrollable transformation and societal breakdown. This conflict draws viewers into a gripping tale of friendship, power, and loss.

Beneath the action-packed plot lies a rich tapestry of themes. One of the most striking is the exploration of loss of humanity through power. Tetsuo’s descent into madness as his psychic abilities spiral beyond his control serves as a visceral metaphor for how absolute power corrupts and alienates. The transformation he undergoes, from a troubled youth into a monstrous entity, dramatizes the fear of losing oneself when faced with forces that cannot be tamed. Meanwhile, the other characters and factions, including the military and resistance groups, depict varying responses to such disruptive power, from authoritarian control to emergent heroism among society’s outcasts and delinquents, emphasizing resilience in adversity.

Akira’s setting is crucial to understanding its impact. Unlike other dystopian sci-fi that glamorizes technology, Neo-Tokyo is raw and unpolished—a place of grime, corruption, and social decay. This lack of fetishization makes the depicted world more relatable and unsettling, reflecting post-World War II anxieties in Japan. The narrative draws clear analogies between the trauma of nuclear devastation and the cyclic nature of destruction and rebirth. The film and manga respectively underline how societies can be dehumanized by catastrophe yet still harbor hope for renewal and change.

The adolescent characters also embody a universal coming-of-age struggle, where uncertainties of identity, power, and responsibility mirror Japan’s own postwar societal shifts. Tetsuo’s monstrous growth and Kaneda’s protective yet rebellious nature capture the complex emotions of fear, resentment, and desire for control, making the story as much about internal battles as external ones. This allegorical layer brings timeless relevance, inviting viewers to reflect on personal and collective growth in times of turmoil.

From a technical and artistic standpoint, Akira set new standards for animation. The film’s fluid motion, attention to detail, and atmospheric world-building were revolutionary for the time and still hold up remarkably well. Otomo’s insistence on lip-syncing dialogue and meticulous frames elevated the cinematic experience far beyond typical anime productions of the 1980s. Its high-budget production values and painstaking artistry make every scene visually immersive, from frenetic gang fights to apocalyptic psychic battles.

One of the film’s most iconic and influential moments is the “Akira slide”—the flawless and stylish maneuver where Kaneda slides his motorcycle to a perfect stop amidst a high-speed chase. This scene has become emblematic not only of Akira’s kinetic energy and visual prowess but also of the potential for animation to convey dynamic motion with a sense of weight, style, and personality. The technique has been endlessly referenced and homaged in both anime and live-action works worldwide, shaping how filmmakers portray fast-paced chase and action scenes. Its balance of fluid animation, camera angles, and character flair set a new benchmark for kinetic storytelling, inspiring generations of animators and directors to capture similar moments of cool, precise motion.

Moreover, Akira’s soundtrack and sound design contribute significantly to its gritty and intense atmosphere, reinforcing the emotional beats and tension throughout the film. The score blends pulsating electronic music with haunting melodies, capturing the film’s blend of futuristic dread and human vulnerability.

Critically, Akira is celebrated not just for its technical achievements but also for its complex storytelling and thematic depth. It does not offer neat resolutions or clear heroes; instead, it portrays a morally ambiguous world where power is both destructive and transformative. The lack of easy answers enhances its emotional and intellectual resonance, making it a powerful narrative of destruction, evolution, and hope.

Akira stands among the most influential works in animation and film, a piece that’s carved its place indelibly in cultural history. Its influence isn’t just in the stunning visuals or the groundbreaking animation techniques; it’s also in how it expanded the horizons of what anime could achieve on a global scale. Otomo’s dystopian vision challenged viewers to confront uncomfortable truths about power, chaos, and societal resilience. Years after its debut, the film continues to inspire and provoke new generations of creators—each eager to capture some fragment of its raw energy and layered storytelling. Akira’s legacy is not just that of a cinematic masterpiece but as a catalyst that reshaped the possibilities for animated storytelling, making it a timeless beacon for artists and audiences alike.

Anime You Should Be Watching