Villain of the Day: Gul Dukat (Star Trek : Deep Space Nine)


“A true victory is to make your enemy see they were wrong to oppose you in the first place. To force them to acknowledge your greatness.” — Gul Dukat

Few villains in science fiction are as captivating—and repulsive—as Gul Dukat from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. From his first appearance as the smug, calculating prefect of the Cardassian occupation of Bajor, Dukat defies easy categorization. He is not a mustache-twirling tyrant who revels in evil for its own sake; rather, he genuinely believes himself to be a misunderstood hero. This self-deception is the engine of his charisma. Dukat constantly reminds anyone who will listen that he built schools and reduced labor camp sentences, conveniently omitting that he did so while overseeing the brutal subjugation of an entire species. His charm lies in his utter conviction that he is the victim of Bajoran ingratitude, a twist of logic so audacious it becomes mesmerizing to watch him rationalize atrocity.

What elevates Dukat above a simple megalomaniac is his deeply personal, almost intimate relationship with the protagonists of Deep Space Nine, particularly Commander Benjamin Sisko. Unlike the distant god-like foes of other Star Trek series, Dukat shares a border, a history, and a twisted mutual respect with Sisko. Their face-to-face confrontations crackle with tension because Dukat treats Sisko as a worthy adversary—a peer, even a friend. He craves Sisko’s acknowledgment more than any military victory. When Sisko refuses to validate his worldview, Dukat’s wounded ego curdles into obsessive hatred. This dynamic makes him unpredictable; one episode he is saving the station from a greater threat, the next he is selling out his own daughter, Ziyal, to save his career. His villainy is not abstract—it is a series of intimate betrayals that feel real and devastating.

Another key to Dukat’s magnetism is the show’s willingness to let him be competent, even admirable, in fleeting moments. He is a brilliant strategist, a cultured art lover, and possesses a dark wit that makes him genuinely entertaining. In episodes like “The Maquis, Part II,” he outmaneuvers both Starfleet and the Cardassian Central Command with ease. The series frequently teases redemption: he mourns Ziyal’s death with genuine anguish, he fights alongside the Federation against the Klingons, and he even briefly rejects his former life. Yet, each time, Dukat chooses power and self-justification over change. That tragic cycle—almost becoming better, then plunging further into evil—is what keeps viewers leaning in. We watch not hoping he will be defeated, but wondering if he will finally see himself clearly. He never does.

Dukat’s later descent into pacting with the demonic Pah-wraiths and literal religious madness has been debated by fans, yet it is a fitting culmination of his character. Stripped of his military command, his family, and his self-image as a beneficent ruler, Dukat’s narcissism finds new expression in cosmic evil. He transforms from a political villain into a metaphysical one, declaring himself a god. This shift does not erase his charisma; instead, it reveals that his charm was always a mask for an abyss of ego. Even then, he speaks in smooth, reasonable tones, offering Sisko “peace” if only he will bow. The charisma becomes sinister precisely because it never disappears—he is as persuasive as the devil, and just as hollow.

In the end, what makes Gul Dukat one of the greatest villains in television history is that he is terrifyingly human. He loves his children, believes his own lies, craves respect, and cannot bear to be seen as the monster he is. Deep Space Nine had the courage to let him win small victories, to seduce both characters and audience into almost rooting for him. And every time we feel that pull, the show reminds us: Dukat’s tragedy is not that he is evil, but that he had every opportunity to choose good and refused. His charisma is not a contradiction of his villainy—it is the very mechanism by which he, and we, excuse the inexcusable. That is why, decades later, we still cannot look away.

Villain of the Day

Film Review: The Quatermass Conclusion (dir by Piers Haggard)


1979’s The Quatermass Conclusion opens with a narrator telling us that civilization is collapsing and no one knows why.

Though the film takes place in London and the English countryside, we are told that societal collapse a worldwide phenomenon.  What we see in London is a city that has been taken over by criminal gangs, where the police stand-by helplessly and watch as battles play out.  The elderly, abandoned by their government, hide out in decrepit homes and try to avoid being noticed.  The future is a world that is pretty much ruled by the young and the young appear to be insane.

Even if one escapes the gangs, there’s still the Planet People to deal with.  The Planet People are a group of hippies, who walk across the countryside and who claim that they are going to be transported to another planet.  At first glance, they make seem innocent and even a bit ludicrous.  But they are actually aggressive and angry, convinced that the adults have destroyed the Earth and that the young are the chosen ones who will be transported to a better world.  They are led by a man who calls himself Kick Along (Ralph Arliss), an anti-Semite who smiles when he manages to find a gun and who clearly relishes getting to decide who deserves to be saved and who doesn’t.

Into all of this comes a retired scientist named Bernard Quatermass (John Mills).  Elderly and suffering from heart disease, Quatermass has come to London to search for his missing granddaughter.  Because Quatermass has spent the last few years living in the Scottish highlands and because the British government has covered-up the extent of the unrest, he is shocked to discover just how bad things have become.  Rescued from a gang by another scientist, an astronomer named Joe Kapp (Simon MacCorkindale), Quatermass finds himself watching as humanity slowly sacrifices itself to an alien presence who is not interested in saving anyone but who instead just wants to feast.

The Quatermass Conclusion started life as a 4-episode British television simply called Quatermass, which was the last to feature the character of Prof. Bernard Quatermass.  The four-hour miniseries was edited down to a 100-minute feature film that was subsequently released outside of the UK.  As a result of the editing, The Quatermass Conclusion is a occasionally intriguing, frequently messy, and almost relentlessly downbeat.  Having seen both the original miniseries and the subsequent film, I can tell you that tragedies that were evenly spaced out over the course of four hours come at you nonstop in the feature version.  It seems like every other scene features someone either dying or giving up hope.  Themes that were fully developed in the miniseries are only hinted at in the feature film.  Events that were fully explained and built-up in the miniseries seem to spring out of nowhere in the movie, giving the whole thing a disjointed but nightmarish feel.

Taken on its own, the film has its flaws.  I’m not really sure that the plot can truly be followed if you haven’t already watched the original miniseries. As the unfortunately-named Kick Along, Ralph Arliss gives a disturbingly plausible portrayal of a fascist who has adapted to the latest trend and John Mills is instantly sympathetic as the mentally strong but physically weak Prof. Quatermass but some of the other performances are definitely more appropriate for television than a film.  And yet the film has moments that work incredibly well.  A scene where the alien presence feasts on the thousands who have gathered at Wembley Stadium is undeniably well-done and brings to mind the real-life reports of political dissidents being held and executed in South American soccer stadiums.  By the end of the film, the atmosphere has become so polluted with the particles of human remains that it takes on a sickly yellow hue.  Even the film relentlessly bleak tone works.  If you’re going to make a movie about the collapse of civilization, you should definitely go all out.  There’s not much deliberate humor in The Quatermass Conclusion but, then again, there’s not much to smile about when the world’s collapsing.

Watching The Quatermass Conclusion, what struck me is just how much writer Nigel Kneale and Piers Haggard got right about the future.  On the one hand, the film is anti-youth to the point of almost feeling like a parody.  This is a movie that often seems to be shouting, “Get off my lawn!”  Watching this, one can easily guess how Nigel Kneale felt about everyone from the hippies to the punks.  However, the film’s portrayal of cities where people are scared to go out at night and of bureaucrats who would rather cover-up a problem than solve it feels rather prophetic today.  (In the miniseries, there’s a youthful government official who is overjoyed at the idea of creating an entirely new civilization after destroying the current one and it’s hard to watch him without being reminded of some of the rhetoric of the COVID lockdowns.)  It’s easy to laugh at the Planet People, with their face paint and their chanting, but they really don’t feel that far off from a lot of today’s wannabe activists.  There’s really not that much difference between the smugly ignorant Kick Along and the people who used to throw paint on works of art.

The Quatermass Conclusion is a flawed, messy, intriguing, and prophetic.  It may not be subtle but it’s a film that feel very relevant today.

 

Join #MondayMania For Seduced By A Killer!


Hi, everyone!  Tonight, on twitter, I will be hosting one of my favorite films for #MondayMania!  Join us for 2019’s Seduced By A Killer (a.k.a. Dating To Kill)!

You can find the movie on Prime and then you can join us on twitter at 9 pm central time!  (That’s 10 pm for you folks on the East Coast.)  See you then!

Scenes I Love: Scum of the Earth


Here is a scene that should be familiar to anyone who has ever watched anything from Something Weird, the infamous “you’re damaged goods and this is a fire sale!” monologue from Herschell Gordon Lewis’s 1963 expose of the Hollywood smut trade, Scum of the Earth.

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special Herschell Gordon Lewis Edition


4 Shots From 4 Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films is all about letting the visuals do the talking.

Today, on what would have been his birthday, the Shattered Lens remembers director Herschell Gordon Lewis.  It’s time for…..

4 Shots From 4 Herschell Gordon Lewis Films

Blood Feast (1963, dir by Herschell Gordon Lewis, DP: Herschell Gordon Lewis)

Color Me Blood Red (1965, dir by Herschell Gordon Lewis, DP: Herschell Gordon Lewis)

Something Weird (1967, dir by Herschell Gordon Lewis, DP: Andy Romanoff)

The Wizard of Gore (1970, dir by Herschell Gordon Lewis, DP: Alex Ameri and Daniel Krogh)

Monday Live Tweet Alert: Join Us For Runaway!


As some of our regular readers undoubtedly know, I am involved in hosting a few weekly live tweets on twitter and occasionally Mastodon.  I host #FridayNightFlix every Friday, I co-host #ScarySocial on Saturday, and I am one of the five hosts of Mastodon’s #MondayActionMovie!  Every week, we get together.  We watch a movie.  We snark our way through it.

Tonight, for #MondayActionMovie, the film will be 1984’s Runaway!

It should make for a night of fun viewing and I invite all of you to join in.  If you want to join the live tweets, just hop onto Mastodon, find the movie on YouTube and hit play at 8 pm et, and use the #MondayActionMovie hashtag!  The  watch party community is a friendly group and welcoming of newcomers so don’t be shy.   

See you soon!

Music Video of the Day: Girlschool by Britny Fox (1988, directed by Marc Reshovsky)


If the teacher in this video looks familiar, that’s because Nancy Parsons also played the famous (or infamous) Ms. Ballbricker in Porky’s.

Director Marc Reshovsky also directed videos for Poison, Lita Ford, and Skidrow.  He was far more busy as a cinematographer than a director.  As a cinematographer, he worked with basically everyone who was anyone.  Ice Cube, U2, Van Halen, Whitney Houston, Seal, they are just some of the bands who worked with Reshovsky the cinematographer.

Enjoy!

 

Late Night Retro Television Review: Degrassi: The Next Generation 2.20 “How Soon Is Now?”


Welcome to Late Night Retro Television Reviews, a feature where we review some of our favorite and least favorite shows of the past!  On Sunday, I will be reviewing the Canadian series, Degrassi: The Next Generation, which aired from 2001 to 2015!  The series can be streamed on YouTube and Tubi.

This week, Degrassi goes there.

Episode 2.20 “How Soon Is Now?”

(Dir by Eleanore Lindo, originally aired on February 9th, 2003)

After intensive therapy with the school’s counselor, Ms. Sauve (Jennifer Podemski), Paige convinces herself that she’s emotionally recovered from being raped by Dean.  Paige says she doesn’t need any more therapy and she just wants to get on her with her life.  However, when she discovers that Dean’s school will be coming to Degrassi for a basketball game, she starts to spiral.

Paige’s rape was one of Degrassi’s first “mature” storylines, in that it dealt with a controversial issue and it did so in  a realistic way.  Instead of simply wrapping things up after an episode or two, Degrassi stretched this storyline over several seasons and let it play out with an honesty that is rarely seen on television..  Instead of having Paige magically go back to being who she was before she was raped, Degrassi portrayed how Paige changed as a result of both the rape and her struggle to get justice.  That the show did so realistically is a credit to both Degrassi and Lauren Collins’s portrayal of Paige.

One of the things that makes this episode difficult to watch is that Paige largely suffers alone.  Only a few people know about the rape.  A bitter Spinner still thinks that the encounter between Paige and Dean was consensual.  When Dean does show up at Degrassi, it’s obvious that he feels no guilt about what happened and, soon, he’s even hitting on Manny.  When Paige tries to warn Manny, Manny replies that Dean told her all about how crazy Paige is.  It’s only when Paige tells JT about what happened that someone finally stands up for her.  JT may just be the mascot but he doesn’t hold back when he attacks Dean on the court.  Of course, JT is still JT so it’s not like he really does that much physical damage to Dean but it’s still gratifying to see.  In fact, this is the first episode in which JT actually reveals himself to be something other than just the annoying class clown.

At the end of the episode, Paige tells Ms. Suave that she wants to press charges against Dean.  Ms. Suave warns her that, with the amount of time that has passed, it’s going to be Paige’s word against his.  Paige says she understands.  I always want to applaud at the end of this episode, even though I know how things are going to develop.

As for the B-plot, Marco’s being a jerk.  He and Ellie are working on a class project.  They have to create an ad campaign for a fake cologne.  Marco wants to do a “Bollywood thing.”  Ellie wants to turn Marco into a sex symbol.  Marco gets annoyed because Ellie hasn’t fully accepted that he’s gay and not romantically attracted to her.  Hey, Marco — you’re the one who asked her to pretend to be your girlfriend so that you could stay in the closet so instead of getting mad at her, maybe think about what you’re putting her through!

Seriously, I get that Marco was a ground-breaking character at the time and I respect that, just as with Paige’s storyline, the show attempted to be realistic in its portrayal of Marco slowly finding the confidence to be his true self.  That said, Marco could be really self-righteous.

But no matter.  Even with Marco acting like Marco, this was an important episode.  Degrassi went there.