Book Review: First and Only (by Dan Abnett)


“I value life. That is why I fight to protect it.” — Ibram Gaunt

Dan Abnett’s First and Only, the opening novel in Gaunt’s Ghosts, makes the dystopian universe of Warhammer 40,000 feel big by bringing its perspective down to ground level. Rather than focusing on towering superhuman warriors, it follows ordinary soldiers surviving extraordinary horrors with training, stubbornness, and whatever trust they can place in one another. That approach is the book’s biggest strength. There is plenty of explosive science-fiction action, but the real appeal is its humanity: these people are vulnerable, frequently mistreated, and painfully aware that the enormous empire they serve considers their lives expendable.

The story follows Colonel-Commissar Ibram Gaunt and the Tanith First and Only, a regiment whose name carries an entire tragedy. Their homeworld, Tanith, was destroyed by Chaos, leaving the evacuated soldiers without a home to return to. They are survivors carrying the remains of their world’s identity into somebody else’s war. That gives the familiar military-fiction idea of a close-knit regiment an extra emotional edge. Their shared background matters because it is something they can no longer replenish or revisit. Behind the nickname “Ghosts” sits a loss that makes their continued existence feel both defiant and desperately fragile.

Abnett throws these men into the Sabbat Worlds Crusade, where fighting the enemy is only part of the problem. A conspiracy within the Imperial military draws Gaunt and his soldiers into a struggle involving rival commanders, divided loyalties, and dangerous ancient technology. Without spoiling the major turns, the threat does not arrive exclusively from across the battlefield. The Ghosts also have to survive the ambitions of people supposedly fighting on their side. This gives the novel a streak of bitterness: serving the Imperium does not mean the Imperium will look after you, or even give you a fair chance.

Where First and Only really earns its place is in its down-in-the-dirt portrayal of the average soldier’s life. The early trench fighting on Fortis Binary is not presented as a glorious opportunity to become a legend. It is miserable, dangerous work, made worse by commanders who fail to use the Ghosts’ abilities properly. These are lightly equipped scouts, yet they are pushed into grinding combat where bombardments, gas, and deteriorating morale wear them down. Their immediate concerns are survival and doing their jobs, while the larger military machine treats them as pieces to move around regardless of the human cost.

Despite being set in the 41st millennium, the novel often feels like a combination of World War I trench warfare and World War II urban combat. The trenches evoke the misery of soldiers sheltering under bombardment, while the street fighting brings a tighter, more immediate danger to the action. Lasguns and distant planets supply the science-fiction backdrop, but the experience remains recognizably human. Soldiers still have to keep their heads down, navigate hostile ground, and trust the people beside them. The effect is unsettling: humanity has reached the stars without leaving its worst military habits behind.

That ground-level perspective also shapes the book’s sense of day-to-day military life. Even when the plot becomes more dramatic, attention stays on the relationships that make a regiment function: confidence in a commander, resentment toward outsiders, personal loyalties, and friction between soldiers from different backgrounds. Abnett understands that an army is not one seamless organization simply because everyone wears an Imperial uniform. Different regiments bring different traditions and assumptions, and those differences can become dangerous. The Ghosts’ stealth-focused approach contrasts with other units’ equipment and discipline, making the military feel like a collection of distinct cultures rather than an interchangeable crowd with guns.

Gaunt holds that complicated mixture together, and he makes a strong central character because his authority comes with competing responsibilities. As both colonel and commissar, he represents military command and institutional discipline, yet his concern for his soldiers gives him a more personal stake than simply completing orders. Much of the novel’s character work concentrates on him, including episodes from his past that help explain his present struggles. He is capable and heroic, certainly, but his most interesting quality is the effort required to lead people through a system that can punish good judgment and reward destructive ambition.

The action is another clear selling point. Abnett gives the book variety instead of relying on one enormous battle to carry everything. Trench warfare, fighting aboard a ship, urban pursuits, and close-quarters violence create different kinds of pressure. The smaller encounters can be especially effective because they strip away the scale of the setting and make survival immediate. A knife fight does not need an explanation of galactic politics to feel dangerous. The universe may be absurdly vast, but a vulnerable human body still gives the reader something concrete to worry about.

The book is not equally smooth in every department, though. Its movement between campaigns, conspiracy, and scenes from Gaunt’s earlier life can make it feel episodic rather than seamless. There is a connecting storyline, but the transitions sometimes expose the separate pieces instead of making them disappear into one continuous experience. The supporting cast also has to compete with the emphasis on Gaunt himself. As an opening novel, it establishes a regiment worth following, but it does not always give its individual members as much room as the premise promises. The foundations are engaging; some of the construction remains visible.

The internal rivalry is both a strength and a possible frustration. Anyone expecting a straightforward campaign against Chaos may be surprised by how much attention goes to conflict within the Imperial Guard. That feels like the right choice, even if the conspiracy occasionally distracts from the everyday soldiering. Overall, First and Only is an energetic, grim, surprisingly personal introduction to Gaunt’s Ghosts. Abnett makes the soldiers’ skills, losses, and loyalties matter inside a setting built to dwarf them. These men are expected to keep fighting after losing almost everything, and their struggle makes the distant future feel uncomfortably close to home.

Music Video of the Day: In the Meantime by Spacehog (1995, directed by Jake Scott)


Since it was first released, In the Meantime is one of those song that has come to epitomize an era, in this case the mid-90s.  Even if you don’t know necessarily remember the title or the name of the band that performs the song, you’ll immediately recognize those opening notes.

Some of the song’s success was undoubtedly due to this video, which was directed by Jake Scott and, though it may be hard to believe now, seemed to be very edgy and futuristic in 1995.  Director Jake Scott, incidentally, is the son of director of Ridley Scott.

Enjoy!

Another Halloween Has Come and Gone


Another Halloween has come and gone and with it, another Horrorthon.  We hope you have had a wonderful October and that you’re November brings you much to be thankful for!

And remember, just because you didn’t see the Great Pumpkin this year, doesn’t mean that he won’t be there for you next October.  I think Linus can explain it best:

To all of our readers and from all of your friends at the Shattered Lens, thank you.

Late Night Retro Television Review: Saved By The Bell 3.12 “Date Auction”


Welcome to Late Night Retro Television Reviews, a feature where we review some of our favorite and least favorite shows of the past!  On Saturdays, I will be reviewing Saved By The Bell, which ran on NBC from 1989 to 1993.  The entire show can be purchased on Prime!

This week, the school is torn apart by a date auction!

Episode 3.12 “Date Auction”

(Dir by Don Barnhart, originally aired on November 9th, 1991)

The cheerleaders need to buy new uniforms but they’re informed that Bayside doesn’t have enough money in their budget.  (That’s what they get for not drilling for oil on the football field).  Zack suggests that the cheerleader cheer “in their bikinis.”  Kelly suggests a date auction to raise money because “lots of people would bet on Zack and Slater!”  Jessie, who views the whole idea as being sexist, announce that she will not be bidding and then proceeds to threaten any girl who would even think of bidding on Slater.

At the auction, one of the many Bayside nerds is purchased, for 15 cents, by a girl who wears glasses.  “Awwwww!” say the audience and they should because they’re a cute couple.

Lisa purchases student council vice president Brian Watkins (Patrick J. Dancy).  Brian is an intellectual who loves Catcher In The Rye.  (“I love baseball!” Lisa says).  Brian insinuates that Lisa is too shallow for him so Lisa pretends to be an intellectual too.  When Kelly tells Lisa that she’s not showing her true self, Lisa replies, “This Lisa has a boyfriend.  The old Lisa didn’t.”  Awww, what a sad line!  Actually, why doesn’t Lisa just go out with Jessie’s stepbrother?  They seemed to have a lot of chemistry.  For that matter, where is Jessie’s stepbrother?

No one bids on Slater until Kelly, feeling sorry for him, finally speaks up and purchases a date with him.  An angry Jessie slaps down $25.00 and ends up buying a date with Screech.

Finally, Zack comes out on stage.  There’s a bidding frenzy.  Eventually, Wendy (Judy Carmen) announces that she’s bidding a hundred dollars.  A shocked Zack is sold to Wendy.  Zack doesn’t know how to react because Wendy is — wait for it — overweight!

This episode features both Zack and Jessie at their absolute worst.  Jessie, at least, eventually sees the error of her ways and ends up not only going to the dance with Screech but also forgiving Slater.  Zack, on the other hand, attempts to get out of the date by faking an old track injury.  Of course, Zack then goes surfing.  Did Zack think Wendy wouldn’t hear about that?

Wendy breaks off her date with Zack and the audience applauds.  Even they know that Zack is being a jerk.  Zack goes to the dance alone and sits with the nerds (including the guy who was purchased for 15 cents).  When Wendy shows up, Zack walks up to her and asks her to dance.  Wendy agrees but then Zack ruins the moment by saying that he just feels guilty about the way he treated her.  Wendy doesn’t want Zack’s pity.

Now, that is where the episode should have ended.  Zack screwed up twice.  He’s humiliated at the school dance.  Wendy has stood up for herself.  A lesson has been learned.  Instead, Zack then apologizes to Wendy for a third time and invites her to go to the Max after the dance.  He also turns down Lydia when the latter asks him to dance.  In regards to going to the Max, Wendy says, “I’d like that.”

“And I like you,” Zack says, sounding a bit like a serial killer who is trying to lure his latest victim into his basement.

If anything, Zack is even more condescending at the end of this episode then he was at the start.  But the audience is now on his side.  That’s the important thing.

The other important thing is that Lisa dumps Brian after he starts complaining about her friends.  “Mr. Too Much Attitude!” Lisa calls him.  That’s a line that I’ve used several times since I first watched this episode, usually while talking to a cat.  That said, I do wish the episode had taken the time to explain that, even if Brian was a jerk, it’s still not a bad idea to read a book and expand your mind.  Remember when Zack read about Chief Joseph?

As for Wendy and Brian, they will never be seen again.  Maybe they started hanging out with Jessie’s stepbrother….

 

Lisa Marie’s Week In Television: 10/25/26 — 10/31/26


The Amazing Race (Wednesday Night, CBS)

I wrote about The Amazing Race here.

Bar Rescue (Weekdays, Paramount+)

I woke up on Monday with a splitting headache and an aching ankle.  I watched two episodes of Bar Rescue and I realized that, as bad as I was feeling, at least I wasn’t getting yelled at for not knowing how to make an obscure cocktail.

Community (Peacock)

On Friday night, I watched the first Halloween episode of this classic sitcom.

The Elvira Show (YouTube)

I reviewed The Elvira Show here.

Game 4 of the World Series (Tuesday Night, Fox)

Tuesday was a strange day for me.  I had a terrible attack of anxiety which kept me from getting much done and I ended up falling asleep in the afternoon and not waking up until it was nearly 7:00 pm.  When I get like this, my sister Erin is usually the only person who can calm me down so, on Tuesday night, I watched the World Series with her.  Little did I suspect that the game would last for six hours.  That’s okay, though.  The important thing is that I got to spend time with my sister.

It’s The Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown (Apple TV+)

Erin and I watched this on Friday.  You can read her thoughts here.

Kitchen Nightmares (Hulu)

On Thursday, I watched the infamous Burger Kitchen two-parter.  This is seriously one of the most anxiety-producing television episodes ever aired and I was a nervous wreck by the time it ended.  I would let Executive Chef David Blaine make me a burger any day.

Survivor (Wednesday Night, CBS)

I reviewed Survivor here.

Toy Story of Terror! (Disney+)

As a part of our Halloween tradition, Erin and I watched Toy Story of Terror! on Friday.  You can read her thoughts here.

A Blast From The Past: The Tell Tale Heart, performed by Vincent Price


I couldn’t let Halloween end without sharing at least one more thing featuring the patron saint of the holiday, Vincent Price.

Here is Vincent Price, performing The Tell-Tale Heart.  This is from 1970 and was a part of a PBS special called An Evening With Edgar Allan Poe.

Horror On TV: One Step Beyond 3.36 “Eyewitness” (dir by John Newland)


 

For this year’s final Horrorthon episode, we have the …. final episode of One Step Beyond!

In this, the series’ very last episode, a Boston newspaper reporter in 1883 somehow manages to write a firsthand account of one of the greatest natural disasters in human history, the volcanic eruption of Krakatoa.  Making his accomplishment all the more amazing is that he not only filed the story the day before it happened but he also says that he has no memory of writing it!  What’s going on?  Take one step beyond and find out!

This episode originally aired on July 4th, 1961.

Horror Villain of the Day: Captain Vidal (Pan’s Labyrinth)


“I choose to be here because I want my son to be born in a new, clean Spain.” — Captain Vidal

Captain Vidal from Pan’s Labyrinth stands as one of cinema’s most chilling villains because Guillermo del Toro places him among fantastical monsters without making him any less human—or any less terrifying. He occupies the same film as a Pale Man with eyes in his palms and a mysterious faun, yet Vidal requires no supernatural powers to inspire dread. His evil is methodical, disciplined, and woven into everyday routine. His immaculate appearance and meticulous attention to his watch coexist with his willingness to torture and murder. What makes him frightening is not simply that he commits atrocities, but that he regards them as entirely compatible with an orderly, respectable life.

Vidal captures the banality of fascism: the normalization of cruelty until it becomes an ordinary instrument of authority. Although his overt sadism makes him a more complicated example than a straightforward illustration of Hannah Arendt’s “banality of evil,” he embodies the terrifying substitution of obedience and procedure for moral judgment. When he murders two men suspected of aiding the guerrillas, the discovery that they really were hunting rabbits prompts no remorse—only irritation that his subordinate failed to search them properly. The scene is distinct from his later torture of a captured rebel who stutters, but both reveal the same worldview: another person’s vulnerability offers an opportunity for domination rather than a reason for restraint. Atrocity is not a deviation from his working day; it belongs to it.

Vidal’s obsession with legacy reveals how authoritarian power sustains itself through inheritance and heroic mythology. At dinner, a guest recounts the story that Vidal’s father smashed his watch on the battlefield so his son would know the precise moment of his death—and therefore how a brave man dies. Vidal dismisses the story, yet his fixation on the watch and his final request to have his own time of death preserved suggest how deeply that paternal ideal governs him. The significance lies in the grip of the legend: Vidal imagines fatherhood less as a relationship of care than as the transmission of masculine authority. His son becomes the intended inheritor of a story Vidal is determined to control, extending his obsession with obedience beyond his own lifetime.

The captain also dramatizes how cruelty becomes normalized under authoritarian rule, accommodated as the supposed cost of order. Yet the people around him should not be mistaken for a uniformly complicit household: Mercedes and Dr. Ferreiro actively resist him, exposing the difference between outward obedience and genuine acceptance. When Ferreiro mercifully ends a tortured prisoner’s suffering, Vidal responds, “You could have obeyed me.” The doctor’s answer identifies the moral emptiness beneath that demand: obedience without thought is something people like Vidal practice. Their exchange crystallizes the captain’s understanding of power. He treats compassion as insubordination because he recognizes no moral obligation that might legitimately override his command.

Ofelia’s fantasy realm gains its power through its disturbing resemblance to Vidal’s reality. The Pale Man’s lavish table invites comparison with the captain’s banquet, making the fairy-tale monster an interpretation of the human world rather than merely an escape from it. Both figures turn spaces associated with nourishment and hospitality into sites of danger. But resistance to Vidal also takes practical, human forms: the doctor refuses to prolong torture, Mercedes works against the captain from within his household, and she uses a concealed knife to escape his control. Read alongside Ofelia’s refusal to surrender her conscience, these acts suggest that resistance begins when people reject authority’s claim to determine what is right.

Finally, Vidal achieves iconic status because he is denied the heroic legacy he craves. Facing death, he asks that his son be told the time his father died. Mercedes interrupts him with the devastating reply, “No. He won’t even know your name.” His defeat is therefore more than physical: he loses control of the future he believed belonged to him. Although Vidal represents the fascist regime of Franco’s Spain, his significance need not remain confined to that historical setting. He can also be read as a reflection of individuals who espouse fascist ideals in today’s world: those who equate strength with domination, demand unquestioning loyalty, and excuse cruelty when it targets people they consider inferior or threatening. This is what makes him so enduringly disturbing. He is not merely a monster safely contained in the past, but a warning about a mindset that can reappear wherever obedience is valued above conscience and order above human dignity.

Villain of the Day

Horror Film Review: Pan’s Labyrinth (dir. by Guillermo del Toro)


“But Captain, to obey—just like that—for obedience’s sake… without questioning… That’s something only people like you do.” — Doctor Ferreiro

Guillermo del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth (2006) is the kind of fairy tale that reminds you these stories were never supposed to be completely comforting. Beneath the princesses, magical doorways, and mysterious creatures, there have always been warnings about cruelty, temptation, and adults who cannot be trusted. Del Toro brings those darker instincts to the surface, creating a film that is beautiful without being reassuring and frightening without feeling empty. Its greatest achievement is weaving together the horror of Francoist Spain, the dark fantasy of Ofelia’s childhood imagination, and the reality of everyone caught in between. These worlds do not compete for attention; they make each other more disturbing.

Set in Spain in 1944, the story follows Ofelia, played by Ivana Baquero, as she arrives at a remote military outpost with her pregnant mother, Carmen. Her new stepfather, Captain Vidal, is hunting Republican resistance fighters, and his household operates with the same cold discipline as his military command. Nearby, Ofelia discovers an ancient labyrinth and meets a faun who tells her she may be a lost princess. To reclaim her place in an underground kingdom, she must complete three tasks. That setup sounds like an adventure, but del Toro quickly establishes that neither world offers reliable safety.

What makes the historical setting so effective is that fascism is not just background scenery. It shapes the smallest interactions: who gets to speak, whose pain matters, and who must obey without asking questions. Vidal treats his authority as something natural and unquestionable, whether he is dealing with soldiers, servants, or his own family. The violence can be shocking, especially when it arrives abruptly during otherwise ordinary encounters. Still, the brutality has a purpose. Del Toro refuses to let the audience treat political oppression as an abstract idea when its consequences are written directly onto people’s bodies.

Sergi López makes Vidal terrifying because he rarely seems to think of himself as a monster. He behaves like a man convinced that order excuses anything. His immaculate appearance and controlled manner make his cruelty feel deliberate rather than impulsive. There is something especially ugly about watching someone approach violence with the patience another person might bring to a household chore. Compared with the creatures lurking in Ofelia’s magical world, Vidal is painfully recognizable. He needs no supernatural powers, just the expectation that everyone around him will submit.

Some viewers may find Vidal’s near-total viciousness limiting, but his lack of moral ambiguity feels like the point. He does not need a sympathetic backstory to become convincing. Read against the experience of Francoist repression, his entitlement, obsession with obedience, and casual dehumanization make him a chilling representation of someone who has completely bought into fascism. Rather than assuming that everyone who survived or studied the period would judge him identically, the stronger argument is that his apparent exaggeration serves a purpose. What looks like uncomplicated villainy can reveal the terrifying consistency of someone who treats brutality as a duty.

Against that certainty, Baquero gives Ofelia a wonderfully unforced mixture of curiosity, stubbornness, and fear. She is not a miniature action hero, and the film is stronger for it. Sometimes she makes mistakes; sometimes she follows a rule before understanding it. Her imagination gives her a language for experiences the adults dismiss or refuse to explain. Yet calling the fantasy mere escapism misses what makes it interesting. The tasks confront her with danger and moral choices rather than simply offering somewhere pleasant to hide. Her imagined identity becomes a way of discovering who she wants to be.

The creatures are a huge part of the appeal, but their beauty is always slightly wrong. The faun looks ancient, earthy, and difficult to read, more like something uncovered beneath a forest than a friendly guide. His presence makes every promise feel conditional. Then there is the Pale Man, whose banquet scene turns a familiar fairy-tale warning into an almost unbearable exercise in suspense. Del Toro understands that a monster becomes more frightening when its surroundings tell a story before it moves. The feast, the stillness, and the suggestion of previous victims make the room feel contaminated by appetite.

Crucially, those fantasy sequences do not interrupt the political story. They echo it. Both worlds contain powerful figures who issue commands, establish punishments, and expect a child to accept their rules. That connection gives the film its bite: learning to behave well is not necessarily the same as learning to obey. Ofelia must develop judgment, not just discipline. Meanwhile, Mercedes, the housekeeper, and the doctor face versions of that same dilemma. Their resistance depends on concealment, nerve, and helping others when discovery could mean death. Through them, the film makes ordinary care feel dangerous and morally urgent.

The film also makes a wonderful bookend to del Toro’s earlier The Devil’s Backbone (2001). Set during the final year of the Spanish Civil War, that film approaches violence and abandonment through children living in a haunted orphanage; Pan’s Labyrinth moves into the dictatorship’s aftermath. Del Toro himself described the later film as a companion, or sister, to the earlier one. Together, they trace childhood vulnerability across the war and its consequences, using supernatural encounters to expose wounds that adults cannot—or will not—address. One gives us a ghost story, the other a dark fairy tale, but both make human cruelty more frightening than the creatures.

Visually, Pan’s Labyrinth balances richness and decay. The forest and underground spaces feel textured, damp, and old, while Vidal’s surroundings suggest rigid arrangements and suffocating control. Even when the fantasy offers warmer colors or inviting shapes, something unsettling remains underneath. That consistency matters: the magical world never looks as though it belongs to a different movie. Wonder and dread occupy the same space, allowing a doorway, a root, or a shadow to seem beautiful and threatening at once. The shifts between graphic injury and childhood wonder can be punishing, but softening that contrast would weaken the reason Ofelia needs another world.

By the end, Pan’s Labyrinth has made its magic inseparable from grief. Its closing images allow consolation and devastation to coexist without letting either cancel the other out. How literally to understand Ofelia’s experiences remains compelling, but the emotional stakes are clear: imagination can preserve possibility when the surrounding world demands surrender. This is dark fantasy with something urgent beneath its exquisite surfaces. It understands that monsters can inhabit fairy tales, military uniforms, and systems of obedience—and that choosing compassion may be the most meaningful refusal available.