Review: Normal (dir. by Ben Wheatley)


“I used to be a regular sheriff.” — Sheriff Ulysses

Ben Wheatley has built a career on making audiences uncomfortable. From the cultish dread of Kill List to the seasick chaos of Free Fire, he specializes in a specific kind of British miserablism that suddenly snaps into shocking ultraviolence. So, the idea of him directing a snowbound, American action-comedy starring Bob Odenkirk felt a little like hiring a surgeon to cater a birthday party. You know the food will be technically proficient, but you are terrified of what might be in the sauce. The 2026 film Normal, written by Derek Kolstad and Bob Odenkirk, is exactly that catering job: it is messy, bloody, surprisingly filling, and leaves you with a weird stomach ache if you think about it too long. But in a summer movie season often defined by joyless CGI sludge, Normal is a blast of R-rated, mid-budget freshness that knows exactly how stupid it is, even if it stumbles on its way to the finish line.

The premise is a beautiful piece of elevator pitch simplicity. Odenkirk plays Sheriff Ulysses, a haunted, world-weary interim sheriff who takes a short-term gig in the tiny, freezing Minnesotan town of Normal. The previous sheriff died under mysterious circumstances (ice fishing accident, sure), and Ulysses is just looking for a quiet place to drink coffee, ignore his wife’s phone calls, and heal. The problem is that Normal, Minnesota, is anything but. As Ulysses walks the beat, he notices the quiet desperation of rural America has been replaced by a strange, Stepford-like prosperity. The knitting store sells AR-15s. The diner’s walls are lined with loaded rifles. The town has somehow raised sixteen million dollars for a new town hall. It turns out that the citizens of Normal have sold their souls—and their town—to the Yakuza, acting as a quiet, frozen Swiss bank account for Japanese organized crime. When a pair of bumbling out-of-town robbers (Reena Jolly and Brendan Fletcher) hits the local bank, the bulletproof glass shatters, and Ulysses finds himself trapped in a blizzard, fighting for his life against an entire town of friendly, flannel-wearing killers.

Having Odenkirk as co-writer explains a lot about why Normal feels different from Kolstad’s other work. Where John Wick and the first Nobody are lean, machine-tooled scripts, Normal has a looser, more character-obsessed texture. The dialogue is full of weird pauses, non-sequiturs, and the kind of conversational detours that defined Odenkirk’s television work on Better Call Saul. You can feel the actor’s hand in every scene where Ulysses just stares at a absurd situation and mutters something mundane like “Well, that’s not ideal.” If you have seen the Nobody films, you know the rhythm Odenkirk plays as a performer. But what makes Odenkirk so fascinating to watch in Normal is how he continues to solidify an idea we haven’t really seen since Liam Neeson stumbled into Taken: the deeply unconventional action hero. Think about it. Before Neeson, action stars were Schwarzenegger, Stallone, Willis—men built like refrigerators. Then Neeson showed up at fifty-six, all grief-stricken eyebrows and theatrical training, and suddenly audiences realized that a sad dad with a “particular set of skills” was just as terrifying as any bodybuilder. Odenkirk is the spiritual successor to that twist.

No one ever looked at the guy who played slimy lawyer Saul Goodman or the hapless comic from Mr. Show and thought, “There is our next great screen fighter.” Yet here we are, years after the first Nobody, and Odenkirk has quietly become the most believable everyman action lead of his generation. Unlike Neeson’s brooding intensity, Odenkirk brings a specific, almost pathetic vulnerability. In Normal, he excels at playing the “sad dad” action hero—the guy whose joints pop when he stands up, who looks like an accountant but moves like a bar fight. Ulysses isn’t a retired assassin; he’s just a cop who is very, very tired. When he dispatches a thug with a fire extinguisher, there is no cool one-liner, just a wheeze and a wince. That grounded exhaustion is the Odenkirk brand, and because he co-wrote the part, it fits him like a tailored suit. He sells the physicality without losing that “I’m too old for this” shuffle, making you believe a middle-aged man could survive a gauntlet of killers purely out of stubbornness and regret. Henry Winkler, as the smarmy Mayor Kibner, chews the frozen scenery with glee, playing a man so polite and effervescent that you want to punch him immediately. Lena Headey shows up as a barkeep with a shotgun, and while she doesn’t get enough to do, she brings the necessary grit.

However, the secret weapon here is actually Ben Wheatley and his “anti-action” philosophy. In a recent interview, Wheatley described the violence in Normal as being akin to Final Destination. That is the smartest thing about this movie. In a typical John Wick movie, the hero is a force of nature; he actively kills people with surgical precision. In Normal, Ulysses doesn’t so much defeat the town as survive it. In one fantastic set piece, a character slips on ice and impales themselves on their own bayonet. In another, a massive sign falls and crushes a gunman mid-monologue. The town itself becomes a hostile, slippery, glass-strewn deathtrap. This gives Normal a chaotic, Looney Tunes energy that separates it from its cousins. You never know who is going to die next or how, and Wheatley directs the carnage with a blackly comic eye. The sound design of bones crunching against frozen asphalt is disturbingly hilarious. This isn’t the graceful ballet of assassination; it’s the slapstick of murder, and it is refreshing. And Odenkirk’s performance is the perfect anchor for this chaos because he always looks slightly surprised to still be alive—a quality Neeson, for all his skills, rarely conveyed. The fact that Odenkirk helped write the script means those reactions of shock and reluctant disgust feel genuine rather than performed.

But let’s address the moose in the room. Normal desperately wants to be Fargo, but it only has the vocabulary of a comic book. The Coen Brothers’ masterpiece works because the quirky dialogue masks a terrifying emptiness. Normal wears its quirk on its sleeve like a cheap souvenir. The film tries to weave in social commentary about the death of rural America, gun culture, and even features a subplot involving a trans nonbinary teen (Jess McLeod) who was the child of the previous sheriff. These moments are handled with a surprising amount of grace—they aren’t preachy, just present. However, the film is moving so fast (the runtime is a lean 91 minutes) that it forgets to give these themes any weight. You get a five-second shot of a wall of guns, and then someone blows up. The commentary is there, but it’s just set dressing for the explosion.

Furthermore, the plot structure is lopsided. The film opens with a cold sequence in Japan with the Yakuza cutting off fingers and looking menacing. It feels like a contractual obligation to remind you this is from the John Wick universe, and it’s hard not to wonder if that was a Kolstad-driven choice while Odenkirk might have preferred more mystery. It completely spoils the slow-burn reveal of the town’s corruption. Imagine The Wicker Man if the first scene showed you the villagers burning the wicker man. The tension of Ulysses realizing that “the call is coming from inside the house” is neutered because we, the audience, already know the Yakuza are lurking in the basement. Also, for a movie called Normal, it is incredibly predictable within its own lane. Once the shooting starts, you know exactly where Ulysses is going to end up (spoiler: a hardware store and then the police station). The film devolves into a familiar Assault on Precinct 13 siege scenario, and while the kills are inventive, the geography of the action gets muddy. Wheatley shoots the snowy exteriors beautifully—the white landscape makes the red blood pop like neon—but during the frantic third act, the editing gets choppy, and you lose track of who is shooting whom. For a movie that prides itself on “anti-action,” it relies heavily on the generic rhythms of action in its final twenty minutes.

Despite these structural hiccups, Normal works because it never overstays its welcome. At a brisk hour and a half, it gets in, blows up a town, and gets out. Bob Odenkirk continues to prove that he is the most relatable action hero of the 2020s—the natural heir to the “unlikely badass” throne that Liam Neeson occupied for a solid decade. Where Neeson brought Shakespearean tragedy to the genre, Odenkirk brings a frustrated accountant’s fury. He looks like he just finished paying his taxes, and you believe he is furious about it. Having co-written the film only deepens that authenticity; this isn’t a star merely showing up to say lines, but an actor who has shaped the material to his exact strengths. Ben Wheatley manages to smuggle just enough British cynicism and nasty violence into the frame to keep genre fans on their toes.

Is Normal a great film? No. It is too shallow and too structurally messy for that. But is it a great time at the movies? Absolutely. It is the cinematic equivalent of comfort food laced with hot sauce. You know what you are getting, but the kick is still satisfying. For fans of Odenkirk’s grumpy charm and Wheatley’s chaotic tendencies, Normal is a perfectly abnormal way to spend an evening. Just don’t go looking for the heart that the title promises; this one is all viscera. And frankly, in an era where most action movies are built from the same digital spare parts, watching a former comedy writer freeze his way through a Yakuza invasion feels like the most refreshing kind of normal we could ask for.

Hero Of The Day: Leo Kessler (Ten To Midnight)


“Jerry, I’m not a nice person. I’m a mean, selfish son-of-a-bitch. I know you want a story, but I want a killer and what I want comes first!”

— Detective Leo Kessler (Charles Bronson) in Ten To Midnight (1983)

At first, Detective Leo Kessler seems like exactly the type of cop that you would expect to find in a film about a serial killer who knows how to manipulate the system to his advantage.  Kessler is tough, plain-spoken, a blue collar warrior who is trying to keep the streets of Los Angeles safe for citizens of every age.

“I remember when the legal meant lawful,” Kessler says, “Now, it means loophole.”

Kessler isn’t thrilled that his new partner, Paul McAnn (Andrew Stevens), is a graduate of Berkley and that he’s got a degree in sociology.  Kessler’s doubts are actually justified.  One of the first things that McAnn does is drop a wad of chewing gum on the ground at a crime scene.  Kessler also knows that Warren Stacy (Gene Davis) is the psycho who has been targeting young women and making obscene phone calls to his daughter, Laurie (Lisa Eilbacher).  When McAnn discovers that Kessler has planted blood evidence on Warren’s clothes, McAnn is torn about what to do.  “Forget what’s legal,” Kessler says, “and do what’s right.”

But here’s the thing with Kessler.  He may say that he’s a mean son of a bitch but he’s not.  He’s actually a pretty nice guy.  He even discovers that he likes and becomes a mentor to McAnn.  Kessler just doesn’t think that someone like Warren Stacy should be wandering around, free to kill.  Charles Bronson never gets nearly enough credit for his acting.  Leo Kessler isn’t just a touch cop.  He’s an old-fashioned guy in a changing world.  He’s someone who doesn’t understand why the system is suddenly more worried about the Warrn Stacys of the world than the victims.

He’s also a father.

Leo: “I hate quiche.”

Laurie: “Why did you get it?”

Leo: “I thought it was pie.”

As violent and exploitive as From 10 To Midnight is, I have to admit that I have a sentimental attachment to the film.  The difficult-but-loving relationship between Leo and Laurie Kessler reminds me of my own relationship with my Dad.  I see a lot of my Dad in Leo and I also see a lot of myself in Laurie.  There’s a scene early on where McAnn mentions to Laurie that she’s a lot like her father.

“You think so?” Laurie replies, “I don’t.”

That scene gets me every time because I’ve had people say the same thing to me about my Dad and I used to have the same response.  Everyone else picked up on it long before I realized it.  For all of Laurie complaints about Leo having always been too busy for her, she’s there to comfort him after he gets kicked off the force.  “I’m getting drunk with my old man,” Laurie says.  Leo replies that she’s not.

It’s rare to see Charles Bronson cast as a family man.  Usually, he played loners, the type of solitary warriors who seemed to have nothing in their lives beyond doing accomplishing whatever their mission happened to be.  The Death Wish films did give Bronson a family but they were all dead by the end of the second film.  10 To Midnight features Bronson as not just a tough cop but also Bronson as a father with an independent and intelligent daughter.  I think that’s the main reason why 10 to Midnight is my favorite Bronson films.

“No, we won’t.”

— Detective Leo Kessler

Bronson only fires his gun once in 10 To Midnight but he definitely makes a statement with that shot.  And after spending 101 minutes watching Kessler trying to stop Warren Stacy, there’s definitely something very cathartic about the simple brutality of the film’s ending.  Trying to analyze or understand evil, the film tells us, is pointless.

Sometimes, you just need someone who is willing to say, “No, we won’t.”

Hero of the Day

Billy Idol Should Be Dead (2025, directed by Jonas Akerlund)


Billy Idol Should Be Dead is the title of a new documentary about Billy Idol and, watching the movie, it’s hard not to agree.

Billy Idol Should Be Dead covers Billy Idol’s storied career, from being a member of the Bromley Contingent to his time as lead singer of Generation X to his solo career and his current status as an unlikely elder statesman of rock and roll.  The film features interviews with Miley Cyrus and Billie Joe Armstrong and, despite the age differences, you only have to listen to them and then listen to the 70-something Billy Idol to see the difference between a true rocker and a pretender.  Even in his 70s and speaking in a gravelly voice, Billy Idol still has the charisma and the confidence that made him a star.  He still has the genuine punk rock attitude that bands like Green Day have made a lot of money imitating but which they have never matched.

The documentary is as open about Billy Idol’s history of drug abuse as Idol himself has been.  Idol became a heroin addict at an early age and doesn’t really start to think about cleaning himself up until his father comes over to America and scolds him.  Throughout the film, we hear about overdoses and lost weekends and all the times that Billy Idol came close to dying.  We also hear about the motorcycle accident that nearly lost him his leg and which ultimately inspired his most controversial album, Cyberpunk.  Why did Billy Idol survive while so many of his contemporaries did not?  Why was Billy Idol able to survive heroin while so many of the original punk rockers succumbed to it?  Who knows?  Luck of the draw, perhaps.

The theme of family runs through Billy Idol Should Be Dead.  Though Billy’s father is no longer around to offer up his perspective, Billy’s mother is and she’s the epitome of the perfect English mum, amused by her son’s antics even when she doesn’t quite understand them.  Billy Idol’s relationship with his father is one of the running themes of the film.  It was a difficult relationship but one built on familial love.  The relationship is reflected by Idol’s relationship with his own children, all of whom seem to be remarkably stable for someone who grew up with a rock star for a father.

The film alternates between archival footage of the young and cocky Billy Idol and black-and-white scenes of the contemporary Billy Idol.  The older Idol still has his swagger but he also has a hard-fought wisdom that younger Idol lacked.  The younger Idol thought he was indestructible while the older Idol is happy to be alive and be a grandfather.  The older Idol also reveals himself to be far more thoughtful than I think anyone gave the young Idol credit for being.  This documentary shows not only how Billy Idol survived a lifestyle that should have killed him but also how and why he’s earned his place as one of rock’s elder statesmen.

Billy Idol probably should be dead but this documentary will make you happy that he’s not.

Cinemax Memories: Stormswept (1995, directed by David I. Fazer)


Brad recently told me that he missed out on Late Night Cinemax in the 90s so, for this week, I’m going to review a few films from the era.  I’m going to start with Stormswept, which is currently available on Prime.

Dottie (Melissa Moore) is a Louisiana realtor who has been assigned to show a plantation to Marla (Kim Kopf), an actress.  When Dottie enters the main house, she has flashbacks to a traumatic experience that happened years ago.  Dottie tries to talk Marla into looking at a different house but both Marla and the crew who are shooting her latest movie are drawn to the plantation.  On a stormy night, a game of truth or dare leads to hypnosis, nudity, attempted murder, more nudity, the supernatural, and even more nudity.

Stormswept is the epitome of a 90s Cinemax film.  Before Cinemax became a semi-respectable network and all of the old direct-to-video softcore films moved to streaming platforms, late night Cinemax was the main place to see films like Stormswept.   Movies like this are why Cinemax was, for the longest time, nicknamed Skinemax.  (Even Jerry Seinfeld made a joke about it on an episode of Seinfeld when he said, “People don’t just bump into each other.  This isn’t Cinemax.”)  Most of the movies that showed up on late night Cinemax in the 90s weren’t very good but, for viewers of a certain age, they were very popular.

So, what about Stormswept?  Is it any good?  The plot is impossible to follow and the dialogue is so risible that it could have been written by AI but it’s a still a film that, for better or worse, epitomizes an era.   Whatever else, Stormswept does generate some atmosphere and, even more importantly, it features some of the most popular B-movie actresses of the 90s.  Melissa Moore, Kim Kopf, Lorisa McComas, and Kathleen Kinmont are all featured in the movie and they all give better performances than the material probably deserved.  Melissa Moore, who I will admit is one of my favorite Cinemax actresses, is especially good as Dottie.  Even though the camera ogles her and, as soon as Moore opens her bedroom door in a towel, it’s obvious that the towel will be on the floor within minutes, Melissa Moore still gives a committed and sincere performance as the only person in the house who truly seems to understand that something bad is going to happen.  She is still sympathetic and believable as Dottie and you actually do want to find out the secrets of her past experiences with the mansion.

I should give proper warning here.  Stormswept is definitely a softcore film, make no mistake about that.  Even by the standards of 90s Cinemax, a few of the scenes are unusually explicit.  But, with its game cast and occasionally interesting story, it’s also a pretty good example of what made late night Cinemax memorable beyond the nudity.

Villain of the Day: Emilio Barzini (The Godfather)


Emilio Barzini.

As played by Richard Conte in The Godfather, Barzini is far different from many of the other mob bosses that we meet over the course of Mario Puzo’s and Francis Ford Coppola’s Mafia epic.  He doesn’t yell.  He doesn’t threaten.  If anything, Barzini comes across as almost being a statesman.  When it’s time to broker a peace between the Tattaglia and the Corleone families, Barzini is the one who sits at the head of the table.  When it’s time to determine how the drug trade will be divided, Barzini is the one who offers up the “sensible” solution.  Barzini keeps calm.  He knows how to deal with volatile people.  He just wants to make sure that peace is restored and everyone gets a fair cut of the profit.  “We are not communists,” he says.

It’s after that meeting that Vito Corleone finally realizes that everything that has happened, from the nearly successful attempt on his life to the exile of Michael to the death of Santino, was Barzini’s doing.  Barzini perhaps a got a bit too clever for his own good.  By so coolly and efficiently brokering the peace, Barzini revealed that was far more clever than the “pimp” Philip Tattaglia.  Whereas Tattaglia was too crude to put together a coalition against the Corleones, Barzini was just the type of pitiless manipulator who could convince a group of otherwise powerful people to sign away their own futures.  Perhaps he was a communist after all.

Of course, most viewers (and readers) will have figured out that Barzini is the main bad guy long before Vito does.  From the first minute that we see Barzini at the wedding reception at the Corleone Compound, we know that he’s a sinister figure.  While everyone else at the wedding is being emotional, sentimental, and delightfully Italian, Barzini watches without a hint of emotion.  Indeed, the only time we see any real emotion from Barzini is when he smirks at Vito’s funeral.

After his goons unsuccessfully attempt to assassinate Don Vito, Sollozzo famously tells Tom Hagen that “the Don was slipping.”  And it’s hard not to feel that Sollozzo had a point.  Consider Vito Corleone’s track record in The Godfather.  He failed to teach Sonny the basics of being a good Don.  He promoted Tom Hagen to consiglieri despite the fact that Tom was viewed as being an outsider by the other Families.  When it came time to send someone undercover to investigate the Tattaglias, he gave the job to Luca Brasi despite the fact that everyone knew there was no way that Brasi would actually betray Vito.  He stopped to buy fruit, despite not being accompanied by his bodyguards.  Worst of all, Vito somehow missed that it was Barzini all along.  Vito was slipping.  He got complacent.  He failed to see how the world was changing and how the old honor system was being discarded.  That allowed him to be victimized by Barzini.

Fortunately, Michael was there to take charge.  Unfortunately, for Barzini, Al Neri was also there to put on his policeman’s uniform and wait for Barzini to exit from his latest meeting.  Barzini took several bullets to the back.  Barzini’s driver was caught in the cross-fire.  I’ve always felt bad about that.  I mean, the driver was just asking why he had been given a parking ticket and Neri shot him.  If nothing else, we can see why Neri didn’t make it as a cop.

Barzini and Vito had a lot in common.  They were both diplomats who could use violence when necessary.  It’s perhaps not a surprise to learn that, before he was cast as Barzini, Richard Conte was one of the many actors considered for the role of Vito Corleone.  How different would the film have been with the sinister Conte — as opposed to the likable Brando — in the lead role?

Luckily, Coppola made the right decision. Just as Brando was the perfect Vito, Richard Conte was the perfect Barzini.

Villain of the Day

Film Review: Brainstorm (dir by Douglas Trumbull)


It’s hard to imagine that someone could overact while playing a corpse but Louise Fletcher somehow manages to do just that in 1983’s Brainstorm and I think we owe her some respect for that.  The underrated Fletched won an Oscar for playing Nurse Ratched in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest and she appeared in a handful of other films that I’ve liked (Strange Behavior, the 2012 restoration of Once Upon A Time In America) but, now that I’ve watched Brainstorm, I will always think of her playing a dead character with the biggest, hammiest facial expression ever on her otherwise lifeless face.

In Brainstorm, Fletcher plays Dr. Lillian Reynolds, a chain-smoking scientist who is always upset about something.  When Lillian isn’t lighting a cigarette or yelling, “You sold me out!,” she’s clutching her chest and taking her heart pills.  Working with her partner, Dr. Michael Brace (Christopher Walken), Lillian has developed a brain-computer interface that allows people’s brain waves to be recorded on tape so that others can then experience what they experienced.  In practice, this looks like putting on a helmet and then seeing what appears to be a home movie.  What fun!  Lillian thinks that the interface can be used to change and save the world.  Dr. Brace thinks he can use the interface to discover why his marriage to Karen (Natalie Wood) fell apart.  Their associate, Hal (Joe Dorsey), thinks he can use it to experience his friend screwing the babysitter over and over and over again.  Meanwhile, Alex Taber (Cliff Robertson) thinks that it can be used as a military weapon.

(Hal is probably the one who comes the closest to what people would actually use this technology for.)

Lillian is not happy about her technology being turned over to the military.  She gets upset about it over and over again.  Eventually, she suffers one of the most overdramatic heart attacks ever recorded on film.  Before she dies, she hooks herself up to the machine and records her dying vision.  Michael becomes obsessed with seeing what Lillian saw as she entered the afterlife.  Unfortunately, the mean military folks have the tape so it looks like Michael is going to have to unleash some chaos.  I can’t think of any other film that mixes Christopher Walken having a beatific vision with a bunch of slapstick humor featuring an out-of-control robot and a bunch of soap bubbles.

Today, if Brainstorm is known for anything, it’s as the film that Natalie Wood was shooting when she died.  One popular theory about the circumstances surrounding Wood’s death is that she was having an affair with Christopher Walken.  Watching the two of them in this film should disabuse anyone of that notion as the two of them have absolutely zero chemistry as a couple.  (For the record, I think Wood’s death was an accident and that a lot of self-styled Internet sleuths owe Robert Wagner an apology.)  If there’s anything that this film should be known for, it should be that it features a large number of Oscar nominees and winners and they all end up giving absolutely lousy performances.  Even the usually wonderful Christopher Walken seems to be playing someone imitating himself.  Watching this film, I was never quite sure why anyone was actually doing anything.

Director Douglas Trumbull was best known for designing the Stargate sequence in 2001: A Space Odyssey and, not surprisingly, Brainstorm’s vision of the afterlife is actually pretty effective.  One gets the feeling that Trumbull was more comfortable with the special effects than he was with the human actors.

I have to admit that I always smile a little at films where scientists are shocked — shocked, I tell ya! — to discover that their technology is going to be used for military purposes.  Why did they think the government was funding them in the first place?  Lillian seems to believe that her technology will be used to allow people to experience what it’s like to ride a roller coaster.  That’s what IMAX is for.

Brad reviews MEKKO (2015), Written and Directed by Native American Filmmaker, Sterlin Harjo!


I recently had the opportunity to participate in an interview with the Native American author Sherman Alexie. We were discussing some of our favorite films, and he threw out MEKKO (2015) as a movie he really liked. I was surprised because it’s a movie I had never heard of, and I consider myself in the know when it comes to all things movie related. I checked and it’s streaming on Tubi, so I decided I would check it out for myself.

The story follows Mekko (Rod Rondeaux), a Native American who heads to Tulsa after serving nineteen years in prison for killing his cousin in an alcohol-fueled fight. When what’s left of his family turns their backs on him, Mekko finds himself living on the city’s streets with many other Indians. While he finds a few friends, he also comes across the predatory and murderous Bill (Zahn McClarnon). When Bill turns his focus Mekko’s way, he decides to take things into his own hands.

I’ll just say right off the bat that I think that the best thing about the film is the incredible performance by Rod Rondeaux in the title role. He doesn’t have a lot of credits to his name, but he’s absolutely perfect here. It doesn’t even feel like he’s acting. His face seems to carry a lifetime of regret, but also a hope that his hard-earned wisdom will eventually mean something positive for him and the people he cares about. Rondeaux plays Mekko with a dignity that feels completely out of place with the world he now finds himself in. It’s a masterful performance that would net him the Best Actor award at the American Indian Movie Award ceremony for 2015.

MEKKO was written and directed by Sterlin Harjo, who also created the series RESERVATION DOGS for FX that ran from 2021-2023. A citizen of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma, Harjo presents us with a grungy, realistic film that’s also full of old tribal stories and myths. One of the main reasons that Mekko decides that he must take care of the murderer Bill himself is due to his grandma’s stories about evil spirits and witches that sometime insert themselves into people’s lives. Harjo’s film treats these beliefs at face value, and based on what we’ve seen, it’s hard to argue with him.

I’ve been to Tulsa on a few occasions to watch the PGA Championship at the Southern Hills Golf Course. I’ve never seen the Tulsa that’s presented here. This Tulsa is dirty and extremely dangerous. Harjo used real locations and a lot of regular people from the local Native community, and that certainly adds to the authenticity of the story. As Mekko visits the homeless camps and soup kitchens, it just feels real. When Mekko takes on Bill (a truly frightening performance by Zahn McClarnon), it’s both a physical and spiritual reckoning that seems completely necessary.

MEKKO is definitely a slow burner of a film that’s rough around the edges, but it’s also an undeniably powerful film. It feels honest in a way that most movies don’t. It’s about a wounded, decent person who’s trying to live a better life, and I haven’t stopped thinking about it for days.

I Watched Molokai: The Story of Father Damien (1999, Dir. by Paul Cox)


In the late 19th Century, a leper colony was established on the Hawaiian island of Molokai.  Officially, the Kalaupapa Leprosy Settlement was said to be for the care of people with leprosy, which was then raging across Asia.  Unofficially, it was a prison where lepers were isolated from the rest of society and left to die.  Any leper who tried to leave the colony would be shot on sight.  Father Damien, a Belgian priest, was one of the few people willing to walk amongst the lepers.  When he was first sent to the colony, he was ordered to only administer last rites to the dying and to not allow himself to be touched.  Instead, Damien stayed and ministered to the lepers, knowing that he would probably never be allowed to leave.  For 16 years, Damien ministered to the colony.  Even after he himself grew sick, he continued his ministry and continued to be an advocate for his fellow lepers until he died.

Molokai: The Story of Father Damien is a wonderful film about the life and ministry of Father Damien.  The movie features a lot of familiar actors in small roles, like Sam Neill, Kris Kristofferson, Peter O’Toole, Tom Wilkinson, and Alice Krige.  But the star of the film is David Wenham, who portrays the kindness and dedication of Father Damien without ever making him seem idealized or boring.  Father Damien is guided by both his faith and his belief that no one should be abandoned.  It’s not always easy to watch.  The horrors of leprosy are unflinchingly portrayed.  But, by the end of the movie, it doesn’t matter if you’re Catholic or not.  You’re just thankful for men like Father Damien.

Saint Damien of Molokai was canonized by Pope Benedict XVI in 2009.

I Watched One In A Million: The Ron LeFlore Story (1978, Dir. by William A. Graham)


LeVar Burton stars as Ron LeFore.  After growing up on the hard streets of Detroit and getting addicted to heroin, Ron is arrested for armed robbery and sentenced to four years in prison.  It’s in prison that Ron starts playing baseball and proves himself to be so good at the game that he’s offered a contract with Tigers.  (Manager Billy Martin plays himself.)  Out of prison, Ron proves himself on the field but he worries about his younger brother (Larry B. Scott), who is still trying to survive in Detroit.

This movies was made for television and no one’s going to mistake it for anything other than a television movie.  When the movie was made, Ron LeFore was still playing in the Major Leagues.  Several players appear as themselves and the movie feels pretty sanitized.  None of the other players give Ron a hard time about being a baseball player on parole.  Instead, they’re all supportive and encouraging from the minute he arrives.  They’re the nicest jocks around!  I like baseball players.  I still light up whenever I think about the way Elvis Andrus would smile when he was playing for the Rangers.  But even I know that players like to give each other a hard time.

I still liked the movie because it was about second chances and one of the things that I love about baseball is that it’s a game that gives second chances.  There is always another chance to hit the ball.  There’s always another chance to make a game-saving catch.  There’s always another chance to throw a strike.  A player who struggles on one team can become a star on another.  While the rest of the world gave up Ron LeFore, his family believed in him.  The city of Detroit believed in him.  Baseball believed in him.

LeVar Burton isn’t the most convincing baseball player that I’ve ever seen but Ron LeFore’s story still moved me.  After this movie aired, LeFore went on to set franchise records for stealing bases.  After playing a few seasons with the White Sox, he retired from the game in 1983.

BOOTLEGGERS (1974) – #ArkansasMovies – My Celebration of Movies Filmed in the Natural State!


All my life, my Dad has told me that Roger Corman’s BLOODY MAMA (1970), which was filmed completely in Arkansas, contained scenes along the beautiful white bluffs of Calico Rock, Arkansas. Dad and I watched it today, and we didn’t see any such scenes. I did some quick internet research, and it turns out my dad has been spreading misinformation all these years. He had mistaken the film for a different movie called BOOTLEGGERS (1974). It was filmed in and around the Ozark town of Calico Rock, and it was directed by B-movie maestro Charles B. Pierce (THE LEGEND OF BOGGY CREEK, THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN). Having never seen the film before and only being a few generations removed from my own family’s legacy of bootlegging, I was happy to see that it’s streaming on Amazon Prime and Tubi.

Set in rural Arkansas during the Prohibition era, the movie follows Othar Pruitt (Paul Koslo) and his moonshine-running buddy Dewey Crenshaw (Dennis Fimple) as they manufacture high quality moonshine whiskey and battle their local business rivals, the Woodalls, led by their vicious patriarch Rufus (Seamon Glass). When he’s not battling the Woodall’s and running from the law, Othar finds time to hang out with his grandpa (Slim Pickens) and romance the tough but beautiful Sally Fannie (Jaclyn Smith, who receives an “introducing” credit). If you’ve seen many southern redneck movies, you probably know where this is all heading, but the fun is watching how it gets there!

BOOTLEGGERS is not a traditionally great movie, but there is a lot of fun to be had if you’re in the right frame of mind for some crude regional filmmaking. Director Charles B. Pierce clearly understood rural Arkansas in a way most filmmakers don’t. The dusty roads, cave-based moonshine stills, and run-down old homes feel more authentic since they are actually filmed on location. Heck, a lot of the extras look like they could have wandered into the scenes straight off the local streets and fields. I love Arkansas, and I get an extra layer of enjoyment hearing the characters reference some of my favorite local towns, like Mountain View and Hot Springs. The print I watched looks like a really bad VHS copy, but Tak Fujimoto’s cinematography still manages to capture the scenic nature of the area with its beautiful mountains and those limestone cliffs hanging over the White River. One gripe though… the characters keep referring to the river as the Buffalo River, which is another beautiful river in Arkansas, but it is not the river in this movie.

Another element of the film that I found interesting is the casting of Paul Koslo as the lead and good guy of the film, Othar Pruitt. Koslo almost always plays a slimy bad guy with bad hair, at least he did in Charles Bronson’s 70’s films THE STONE KILLER, MR. MAJESTYK and LOVE AND BULLETS. The German born actor is actually pretty good as an Arkansas redneck, and he seems more comfortable handling the revenge sections of the film than he does the romance and comedy.

As far as the other cast members, Dennis Fimple steals most of his scenes as Othar’s friend Dewey. He’s the goofy but lovable hillbilly friend that these types of movies almost always have. He’s fun here. I always love seeing Slim Pickens and he’s pretty much exactly what you’d expect as an old moonshiner with plenty of homespun wisdom. Jaclyn Smith, a couple of years before her CHARLIE’S ANGELS fame, has a few fun scenes as a pistol-packing local hairdresser who takes a liking to Othar. Needless to say, when she did hit it big, the producers shamelessly repackaged the film to make it seem she was much more important to the plot than she actually is. All part of the 70’s fun of trying to make a buck at the drive-in!

At the end of the day, BOOTLEGGERS isn’t as professionally made as a movie like the Arkansas set WHITE LIGHTNING with Burt Reynolds. What it is though, is a solid southern redneck film, set in a beautiful location, with good performances and a violent ending that should please its intended audience. It certainly did me!