Film Review: They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? (dir by Sydney Pollack)


1969’s They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? is a film about many different things.

On its simplest level, it’s a film about a group of people who, during the Great Depression, take part in a brutal dance marathon in hopes of winning a $1,500 cash prize and maybe the chance to be spotted by a Hollywood talent scout. It’s a film about the desperation of being poor and forgotten, and it’s all the more effective because it was based on a novel that was actually written during the Great Depression. There’s an authenticity to the characters in They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? The original 1935 novel, which I read a few years ago, was written by Horace McCoy, a hard-living Dallas journalist who sometimes supplemented his income by working as a bouncer. McCoy knew the world about which he was writing.

The film is also about the power and allure of fame. The dancers may be exhausted, but they have fans who sit in the stands and who, in return for a smile and a kind word, will sometimes buy them new shoes or a decent meal. At one point, Hollywood director Mervyn LeRoy appears in the audience, and all of the dancers make a point of smiling as they pass in front of him. Meanwhile, the grueling derbies, in which the dancers tandem race in circles around the dance hall, predict the humiliation rituals of reality television. In its way, They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? is just as prophetic a film as Network.

The film is also about memory. The film is full of flashbacks and flash-forwards, giving us a portrait of the life of Robert Syverten (Michael Sarrazin), a homeless man who wandered into a dance marathon in Santa Monica. In a flashback, young Robert watches as his grandfather euthanizes a horse that has broken its leg. In a flash-forward, we watch as Robert talks to the police about a crime. And, in what we assume is the story’s “present,” we watch as Robert is partnered up with Gloria Beatty (Jane Fonda), a weary woman who continues to dance even though she no longer believes any of the hype that emcee Rocky Gravo (Gig Young) spouts about how the marathon can be the start of a brand new life.

It took me a while to get used to the flashbacks and the flash-forwards. At first, I thought they were a mistake. They seemed like a gimmicky addition to an otherwise straightforward story. But as the story played out, I came to appreciate the film’s nonlinear structure. Ultimately, the film is about Robert trying to come to terms not only with his actions but also with the actions of everyone involved with the marathon. I also came to realize that the film’s present was actually Robert in the police station and that the scenes of Robert at the dance marathon were his own memories of the vent. The film becomes less about the Depression and more about one person, a lost soul in a cold world, trying to figure out how his life eventually led to him sitting in an interrogation room, accused of a terrible crime.

The entire cast does a good job. Susannah York, who plays an aspiring actress, has an intense scene in which she breaks down when she can’t find the dress she wants to wear. Bruce Dern and Bonnie Bedelia are sympathetic as a young couple. Veteran tough guy Michael Conrad rolls around on roller skates and barks at everyone to keep moving. When Red Buttons shows up as a kind-hearted veteran dancer, your immediate response is to smile because, as a lover of classic films, you immediately associate Buttons with comedy and optimism. In The Poseidon Adventure, he was the one passenger who never gave up hope. But even his character is soon dwarfed and consumed by the ominous atmosphere inside the dance hall. At first, I thought Michael Sarrazin was a bit too stiff as Robert and Jane Fonda was too brittle as Gloria, but as the film progressed, I warmed to both of their performances. Say what you will about Jane Fonda’s political activism (and I personally think that many of her actions during the Vietnam War and her subsequent claims that American POWs were lying about being tortured were and are unforgivable), she was one of the best actresses of her generation.

Though Robert and Gloria may be at the center of the film, the narrative’s diseased heart belongs to Rocky Gravo. Rocky is the emcee and the promoter, the one who implores the crowd to applaud as their favorite dancers attempt to keep moving on the dance floor after weeks of little sleep or food. “Yowzah, yowzah!” Rocky exclaims, hyping up the audience and promising everyone that good times are right around the corner. Of course, since Rocky is also the event’s promoter, the longer the dancers suffer, the more money he makes. Whenever Rocky is on screen, the viewer can almost smell the gin and the cigars and the flop sweat. Gig Young won an Oscar for playing Rocky Gravo, and he undoubtedly deserved it. At times, it seems less like a performance and more like Young trying to exorcise his own demons. Ten years later, he would murder his fifth wife and then shoot himself.

They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? received a total of nine Oscar nominations. Sydney Pollack received his first nomination for Best Director, and Jane Fonda her first for Best Actress. Susannah York was nominated for Supporting Actress. The film received nominations for its screenplay, its editing, its art direction, and its score. The only winner was Gig Young. At the time, the film set a record for receiving the most Oscar nominations without also receiving a nomination for Best Picture. It’s tempting to say that the film was too dark and too depressing for the Academy, but then you have to consider that the Academy’s pick for Best Picture for that year was Midnight Cowboy.

(Interestingly enough, Michael Sarrazin was also a top contender for the role of Joe Buck in that film.)

It’s not a happy film or a particularly subtle film. But it remains a powerful film, one that truly sticks with you. The film haunts the viewer, as surely as Gloria will always haunt Robert.

Brad reviews THE HARD WAY (1991), starring Michael J. Fox and James Woods!


There was a time in the ’80s and ’90s when seeing either Michael J. Fox or James Woods on the cover of a VHS box at my local video store would guarantee a rental from me. Fox had been my favorite television star throughout the ’80s thanks to his performance as Alex P. Keaton on “Family Ties,” and I loved him in TEEN WOLF and the BACK TO THE FUTURE films. James Woods had become one of my favorite actors beginning in the latter half of the ‘80’s after I discovered his run of intense performances in films like COP, BEST SELLER, and TRUE BELIEVER. So, when THE HARD WAY paired these two favorites together in a “buddy-cop” film, it felt like a movie that had been made specifically for me. I recently upgraded my old DVD by purchasing the Kino Lorber blu-ray, so it was the perfect time for a revisit.

THE HARD WAY follows Nick Lang (Fox), a pampered Hollywood movie star who wants to prepare for a gritty new cop role by shadowing a real detective in New York City. Much to the frustration of badass Supercop John Moss (Woods), he’s forced by his starstruck Captain (Delroy Lindo) to show Lang around town and keep him out of any trouble. Even though he’s supposed to be protecting the megastar, Moss is also tracking a psychopathic killer known as “The Party Crasher” (Stephen Lang), and soon Nick Lang ends up smack dab in the middle of real danger.

By 1991, the buddy-cop formula had been going strong for a while, but director John Badham found a clever angle by pairing Michael J. Fox’s fantasyland “action star” with James Woods’ tough, no-nonsense New York detective. It sounds like a gimmick, and it is, but both the action and comedic elements somehow work.

The performance of James Woods keeps the movie moving forward from start to finish. His John Moss is perpetually angry, sarcastic to a fault, and always seems one minute away from completely losing it. He’s also exceedingly tough when he has to be. Woods plays the character with so much energy that it’s impossible to look away, and nobody gets on his nerves like the Hollywood golden boy. Michael J. Fox is perfect as the shallow movie star, because he could be completely insufferable, but he ultimately brings enough charm and self-awareness to the role to make the character likable. There’s a particularly funny, running joke where different people keep telling his “undercover” character that he looks kinda like Nick Lang… only shorter, or in one case, whiter. At the end of the day, it’s the chemistry between Woods and Fox that makes THE HARD WAY such an enjoyable action comedy!

I did want to shoutout Stephen Lang as well. His “Party Crasher” is a memorable and crazy villain. For a film that leans heavily into the comedy, Lang’s unhinged performance actually feels dangerous, giving the movie some grit and edge when he’s on the screen. I love watching movies from this time period to see the parade of recognizable actors that always seem to show up. This one doesn’t disappoint as Annabella Sciorra, Luis Guzman, LL Cool J, Delroy Lindo, Christina Ricci, and even Penny Marshall appear, to name a few.

One of the best things about THE HARD WAY is that it never sits still for long, which does keep you from focusing too much on a couple of glaring plot holes. The filmmakers smartly keep things moving back and forth between the jokes and the big action scenes, and most of the time it all works. It doesn’t reinvent the buddy-cop film, and it’s not necessarily the first movie you think of in the genre, but I consider it an underrated gem, and I feel like it may have fallen through the cracks over the years. If you’re a fan of peak James Woods, or if you fondly remember just what a big deal Michael J. Fox was in the 80’s, this one is a must watch.

I Watched Summer In The City (2016, Dir. by Vic Sarin)


The lesson of this movie is always be nice because you never know when some rich person might suddenly give you a dream job.

Taylor (Julianna Guill) owns a boutqiue in Ohio and is always honest with her customers, even if it means missing out on an easy sale.  Rich New York fashion maven Alyssa (Vivica A. Fox) just happens to be in town and, when Taylor helps her pick out the perfect outfit for a meeting, she hired Taylor on the spot to come to Manhattan and manage her new store.

At first, Taylor is a fish out of water in Manhattan and she struggles to fit in with Alysssa’s high-powered style of business.  Alyssa’s stores have to make a profit or she’ll lose all of her investors.  Can Taylor bring in the money while being honest with her clients?  Will a sidewalk sale appeal to Manhattan socialites?  Will Taylor be able to bring hats back and also convince her salespeople to switch from all lack to knit dresses?  Taylor also needs to find an apartment but then she meets a hunky realtor named Philip (Marc Bendavid) and they fall in love.  Philip comes from a rich family and has a good job but what he really wants to do is open up a food truck.  But before he can do that, he has to help Taylor adjust to living in the big city.

Think of it as being The Devil Wears Prada, just without the fashion sense or the wicked humor.  Everyone raves about Taylor’s ability to match customers up with the right clothes but none of the outfits that she wears or picks out are really that spectacular or flattering.  It’s a Hallmark movie, through and through.  In real life, no one would hire someone they met two minutes ago to run their flagship star in Manhattan but this is Hallmaker, where everyone’s dreams come true!

I liked the performances of Marla  Sokoloff and Natasha Henstridge.  Marla is someone who was passed over when Alyssa hired Taylor and who now has to work under her at the store.  Nastaha Henstridge is a rich customer.  They were both believable and had some good moments.  There were a few good shots of Manhattan, though the majority of the film was obviously shot somewhere cheaper.

It’s an okay movie if you’re in the mood for a Hallmark version of the Big Apple.  Do you think it’s a smart idea to quit a high-paying job to open up a food truck?  Really?

 

Review: Sabotage (dir. by David Ayer)


“Ammo’s cheap, my life ain’t.” — Joe “Grinder” Phillips

Watching Sabotage, the 2014 David Ayer action-thriller, is a bit like finding a beautiful, high-performance sports car that’s been stripped for parts. It’s got a shiny exterior in Arnold Schwarzenegger, a director known for gritty cop dramas, and a promising cast, but under the hood, the engine is sputtering and the chassis is held together with duct tape and questionable intentions. The film is a strange, often unpleasant beast that seems unsure if it wants to be a complex whodunit, a grim torture-porn horror flick, or a simple action vehicle for its aging star. In trying to be all of them, it mostly succeeds at being a confusing, albeit fascinating, mess.

The film starts with a classic set-up that reeks of potential. Schwarzenegger plays John “Breacher” Wharton, the leader of an elite and ruthless DEA task force. During a cartel raid, the team decides to skim $10 million in cash from the seizure for themselves. Their plan backfires when they go to retrieve the hidden money and find it gone. This creates a perfect powder keg of suspicion and paranoia. While they’re all investigated, no one is charged, and they are put back into action. The plot kicks into high gear when members of the team start getting picked off one by one in increasingly gruesome and inventive ways. Now, Breacher has to find out who is hunting his team, while simultaneously being haunted by a dark secret from his past.

The mystery is clearly meant to be a bloody, modern interpretation of a classic “stranded and hunted” thriller formula. The problem is, the “whodunit” aspect falls flat because the story is just too messy to build any real suspense. The characters are an indistinguishable mass of nicknames like “Monster” (Sam Worthington), “Grinder” (Joe Manganiello), and “Sugar” (Terrence Howard), making it difficult to keep track of who is who, let alone care when they meet their grisly end. The film gives you little reason to invest in them, as they are an intentionally unlikable bunch of thugs who treat civilians with contempt, break the law without a second thought, and generally act like cartoon villains with badges. When a character is killed off, it’s often not a shocking, gut-wrenching twist, but more of a shrug: “Oh, that guy’s gone now.” The plot becomes less about solving a puzzle and more about waiting for the next spectacularly bloody demise.

And those demises are where David Ayer’s direction makes its most “memorable” impact. The violence in Sabotage is not your typical Schwarzenegger shoot-’em-up. It is unflinchingly brutal and hyper-realistic, leaning heavily into the kind of gruesome, elaborate set-pieces that feel borrowed from the horror genre. We’re not talking about clean, one-shot kills; we’re talking about brutal, drawn-out murders involving trains, industrial equipment, and a staggering amount of viscera. The camera lingers on open wounds, bodies nailed to ceilings, and the general gory aftermath of each death with a kind of morbid fascination. The film’s obsession with gore is relentless. It even opens with a scene of Breacher watching a video of his family being tortured, setting a grim, nasty tone that never quite lets up. It feels like Ayer is trying to show the brutal, unglamorous reality of violence, but it quickly crosses the line into exploitation, making the film a punishing watch for anyone not specifically seeking out that level of graphic brutality.

The cast is a mixed bag, and it’s one of the more interesting paradoxes of the film. Schwarzenegger, despite being the star, is a strange fit for this material. Critics noted that he seems to be trying to give a more “dark and complex performance,” mining reserves of darkness he rarely accesses. However, the movie around him doesn’t quite support that ambition. He’s still “Arnold,” and his innate charisma and larger-than-life persona often clash with the grim, nasty world Ayer has created. His presence is too big for the bleak mundanity the movie is striving for, creating a constant tension between the action hero audiences expect and the broken, haunted man the script demands. In stark contrast, it was the supporting female cast that often stole the show. Mireille Enos delivers a truly fearless and unhinged performance as Lizzy, the team’s drug-addicted female member, bringing a level of manic energy that is genuinely engaging. Olivia Williams, as the no-nonsense homicide detective Caroline Brentwood, is also a standout. She plays the “only sane person in the room” with an air of world-weary professionalism that feels like it belongs in a better movie. But even her character is dragged into the muck, with a strange and unnecessary romance that feels forced and out of place.

It’s almost impossible to discuss Sabotage without talking about the tone. The film is relentlessly cynical, presenting a world where the line between law enforcement and the cartels is practically non-existent. Ayer, who has explored the dark side of law enforcement in previous work, seems to be asking a bold question here: what happens when cops are worse than the criminals? The answer, according to the film, is a lot of violence and a total lack of moral compass. This cynical view is further dragged down by a barrage of cheap, sophomoric humor. The script is peppered with scatological jokes, crude sexual banter, and homophobic slurs that feel less like “gritty realism” and more like the writers are trying to be edgy just for the sake of it. This creates a bizarre, off-putting atmosphere where the dark, philosophical musings about corruption are undercut by a high-school-level obsession with bodily functions, making the whole experience feel awkward and juvenile.

In the end, Sabotage is a textbook example of a movie that is sabotaged by its own ambitions. It boasts a director with a distinctive style for crime stories, a legendary action star trying something different, and a cast full of talented actors. Yet, it’s ultimately sunk by a script that can’t balance its whodunit premise with its over-the-top gore, and a tone that can’t decide if it’s a serious crime drama or a nasty, nihilistic joke. It’s not boring, and you can’t say Ayer didn’t try something different with the action genre, but the result is an ugly, mean-spirited, and often just plain unpleasant film. For a fascinating look at what happens when a good idea goes horribly off the rails, Sabotage is a case study in wasted potential. But for a good movie? You’ll want to look elsewhere.

Icarus File No. 29: 1776 (dir by Peter R. Hunt)


The year is 1776.  The British have landed in Canada and are now marching towards New York with the intention of putting down a revolultion that has sprung up over issues like unfair taxation.  In Philadelphia, John Adams (William Daniels) is frustrated by the refusal the second Continental Congress to take up debate on whether or not the 13 North American colonies should announce their official independence from Britian.  Every day, Adams steps into the chamber and demands that the Congress take some action.  And, every day, his fellow deletates sing, “Sit down, John!”

Yes, you read that correctly.  They sing it.

Based on a 1969 Broadway musical, 1776 features a lot of singing, a lot talking, and not much else.  This is a film about the debate surrounding the writing of the Declaraiton of Independence that sometimes feels as if it’s telling its story in real time.  It’s no shock when Benjaming Franklin (Howard Da Silva) continually falls asleep at his desk or when Thomas Jefferson (Ken Howard) sings that he’d rather be home.  This is a nearly 3-hour film that feels like 3 months.  Some films about the Revolutionary War emphasize the brilliance of the Founding Fathers.  Some films emphazie the struggle to be free.  Other films emphasize the daily violence of serving in the army.  1776 captures the monotony of being trapped in a room full of cranky middle-aged men who will not stop talking.  The film dutifully captures every debate and controversy.  When John Adams shouts at everyone to get on with it, it’s hard not to sympathize until you realize that Adams himself is a huge reason why nothing ever seems to get done.  There’s only so many hours in the day that can be devoted to singing songs.

Perhaps the most shocking thing about 1776 is that it was realsed in 1972.  Nothing about 1776 suggests that it’s a product of the same era in which Bob Fosse was redefining the musical with Caberet and Francis Ford Coppola was refefining the historial epic with The Godfather and John Boorman was risking the lives of Burt Reynolds and Jon Voight to capture a weekend rafting trip.  There’s nothing about Peter R. Hunt’s direction to suggest that this film was made in the same era that saw Robert Altman playfully reinventing genres ranging from the service comedy to the detective film to the ensemble musical.  At a time when American directors were rebelling against convention and experimenting with new ways to tell stories, 1776 is a lengthy, dramatically inert and stagebound Broadway adaptation.  In style and look, it feels like a cinematic product of the 1950s or the early 60s, a film that was made when Hollywood’s only competition was from television.  Even Thomas Jefferson’s longing for his wife (Blythe Danner) is played discreetly.  When she finally does show up in Philadelphia, Jefferson closes the shudders.  When John Adams and Benjamin Franklin notice that the shudders are still closed hours later, it’s treated as a moment for everyone in the audience to turn red as they try not to giggle.  They’re having sex, the audience is meant to think, Good thing they’re married!  It’s a moment that feels as natural and human as Sandra Dee looking over her shoulder and winking as she goes off with Troy Donahue.

The key to understanding 1776 is to be found in the opening credits.  “Produced by Jack Warner.”  By the time 1776 went into production, Warner had been a Hollywood mogul for 54 years.  He started his career in the silent era and he built Warner Brothers into one of Hollywood’s most successful studios.  When he was younger, he was the one breaking the rules, making gangster movies and turning actor like James Cagney, Humphrey Bogart, and Edward G. Robinson into stars.  However, by the time he made 1776, Warner was the last of a dying breed.  Despite having greenlit Bonnie and Clyde, one of the seminal “Now Hollywood” productions, the older Jack Warner had little use for the Hollywood counterculture.  1776 was reportedly a pet project for Jack Warner, a film that he took a strong hand in producting and which he expected would sweep the box office and the Oscars.  Warner recruited the majority of the show’s Broadway cast to appear in the film.  Warner personally ordered the remove of a musical number that seemed to discreetly critcize the Vietnam War.  Warner even went on TV to promote the film.  During an interview on the Merv Griffin Show, Warner launched into a triade about “pinko commies.”  I imagine Warner had a point about the communists but it still was probably not the right way to promote the film in the 1970s.  While other films invited the counterculture into Hollywood, 1776 was essentially Jack Warner shouting, “Stay off my lawn!” with the voice of William Daniels.

1776 was a last attempt to hold onto the old way of making movies.  It was a film about a revolution that was desgined to thwart another revolution.  The Continental Congress was menaced by the British.  Jack Warner was menaced by the shadows of Coppola, Scorsese, and Friedkin.  It would be Jack Warner’s final film as a producer.  He died in 1974, still one of the towering figures in the history of Hollywood.  Of the old time moguls, only Adolph Zuker and Darryl F. Zanuck outlasted Jack Warner.

When Hamilon first came out in 2025, it was often described as being the antidote to 1776Hamilton was entertaining where 1776 was stodgy.  Well, maybe.  1776 may lack great songs but it doesn’t really have any truly bad ones either.  Instead, it’s just a very middle-of-the-road show, inoffensive and designed to keep the tourits happy.  Hamilton was viewed as being revolutionary when it was released but now it feels a bit gimmicky, with both the show and the almost religious initial enthusiasm for it feeling like somewhat embarassing artifacts from a different era.  (From the coverage during the Hamilton’s heyday, you would think no one but Lin-Manuel Miranda had ever written about Alexander Hamilton or Aaron Burr before.)  There is a great film to be made about the Continental Congress but it probably doesn’t invovle any singing.

As for 1776, William Daniels is amusing when he gets frusrated and Blythe Danner is far prettier than the real Martha Jefferson and the film itself is a forgettable tribute to the great men who foudned a great country.

Previous Icarus Files:

  1. Cloud Atlas
  2. Maximum Overdrive
  3. Glass
  4. Captive State
  5. Mother!
  6. The Man Who Killed Don Quixote
  7. Last Days
  8. Plan 9 From Outer Space
  9. The Last Movie
  10. 88
  11. The Bonfire of the Vanities
  12. Birdemic
  13. Birdemic 2: The Resurrection 
  14. Last Exit To Brooklyn
  15. Glen or Glenda
  16. The Assassination of Trotsky
  17. Che!
  18. Brewster McCloud
  19. American Traitor: The Trial of Axis Sally
  20. Tough Guys Don’t Dance
  21. Reach Me
  22. Revolution
  23. The Last Tycoon
  24. Express to Terror 
  25. 1941
  26. The Teheran Incident
  27. Con Man
  28. Looker

Insomina File #77: Rolling Vengeance (dir by Stephen Hilliard Stern)


What’s an Insomnia File? You know how some times you just can’t get any sleep and, at about three in the morning, you’ll find yourself watching whatever you can find on cable or streaming? This feature is all about those insomnia-inspired discoveries!

If you’re having trouble getting to sleep tonight, you can always go over to YouTube and watch 1987’s Rolling Vengeance.

Rolling Vengeance supposedly takes place in Ohio but one look at the perpetually wet weather and the misty country side leaves little doubt that this film was shot in Canada.  Joey Russo (Don Michael Paul) is a trucker who seeks revenge after the antics of Tiny (Ned Beatty) and his redneck sons lead to death of first his mother (Susan Hogan) and sisters and then his father (Lawrence Dane).  Joey’s way of getting revenge is to go down to the junkyard, collect a bunch of parts, and build his own monster truck.  Soon, Joey is tracking down Tiny’s men.  Somehow, Joey is able to sneak up on people while driving a gigantic truck.  Also, for some reason, it never occurs to anyone that the best way to escape from the path of a big, lumbering vehicle is to do anything other than run in a straight line.

It’s a bit of a stupid movie and there’s a gratiotious rape scene that is hard to sit through and which leaves a sour taste that runs throughout the final 20 minutes of the film.  Don Michael Paul makes for a blank-faced hero.  On the plus side, the truck destroys a lot of poorly constructed buildings.  Fan of vehicular mayhem will find a lot to enjoy here.  Fans of great character actors going totally overboard in genre films will enjoy watching Ned Beatty as he wears a leather jacket and talks like the leader of the Canadian Hell’s Angels.

As I watched the film, it occurred to me that, if it had been made in the 70s, it would have starred William Shatner as the good trucker and Leslie Nielsen would have played the Ned Beatty role.  Lawrence Dane would have still played the father.

Previous Insomnia Files:

  1. Story of Mankind
  2. Stag
  3. Love Is A Gun
  4. Nina Takes A Lover
  5. Black Ice
  6. Frogs For Snakes
  7. Fair Game
  8. From The Hip
  9. Born Killers
  10. Eye For An Eye
  11. Summer Catch
  12. Beyond the Law
  13. Spring Broke
  14. Promise
  15. George Wallace
  16. Kill The Messenger
  17. The Suburbans
  18. Only The Strong
  19. Great Expectations
  20. Casual Sex?
  21. Truth
  22. Insomina
  23. Death Do Us Part
  24. A Star is Born
  25. The Winning Season
  26. Rabbit Run
  27. Remember My Name
  28. The Arrangement
  29. Day of the Animals
  30. Still of The Night
  31. Arsenal
  32. Smooth Talk
  33. The Comedian
  34. The Minus Man
  35. Donnie Brasco
  36. Punchline
  37. Evita
  38. Six: The Mark Unleashed
  39. Disclosure
  40. The Spanish Prisoner
  41. Elektra
  42. Revenge
  43. Legend
  44. Cat Run
  45. The Pyramid
  46. Enter the Ninja
  47. Downhill
  48. Malice
  49. Mystery Date
  50. Zola
  51. Ira & Abby
  52. The Next Karate Kid
  53. A Nightmare on Drug Street
  54. Jud
  55. FTA
  56. Exterminators of the Year 3000
  57. Boris Karloff: The Man Behind The Monster
  58. The Haunting of Helen Walker
  59. True Spirit
  60. Project Kill
  61. Replica
  62. Rollergator
  63. Hillbillys In A Haunted House
  64. Once Upon A Midnight Scary
  65. Girl Lost
  66. Ghosts Can’t Do It
  67. Heist
  68. Mind, Body & Soul
  69. Candy
  70. Shortcut to Happiness
  71. Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders
  72. Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders II
  73. Don’t Kill It
  74. Listen To Me
  75. 300 Miles For Stephanie
  76. Hackers

Lifetime Film Review: Everyone Has Something To Hide (dir by Sean Cisterna)


Years ago, Kathy Waters (Emily Alatalo) escaped from her abusive husband, taking her young son Noah with her.  Now, Noah (Sam Ashe Arnold) is a senior in high school and a talented composer.  The school band even plays one of his compositions at a football game and everyone in the stands applaud.  It reminded of those old episodes of Degrassi where Marco would write some overwrought performance piece and all the students would respond by going, “Yeah, Marco!”

Unfortunately, Kathy and Noah are not getting along as well as they used to.  They’re fighting and arguing constantly.  Kathy is overprotective.  Noah is …. well, Noah’s kind of a creep.  Noah is always complaining about how his former best friend Ethan is now more popular than he is.  (Ethan plays football.  Noah …. composes orchestrual music.  You do the math.)  Ethan is  mad because Noah is now going out with Ethan’s ex-girlfriend, Maddie (Tori Barban).  At one point, Tori has to duck into a bathroom so she can throw up.  This is a Lifetime film and that means you don’t throw up unless you’re pregnant and trying to keep it a secret.

Kathy is a real estate agent.  That’s not a surprise as selling houses is right up there with owning a bakery or being a mommy vlogger as far as careers in Lifetime movies are concerned.  One morning, she gets a notification that someone has entered one of the empty houses that she’s selling.  Going to the house, she discovers the remains of a wild party.  She also finds Ethan dead in a nearby shed.

Noah becomes the number one suspect.  Soon, someone is spray-painting “MURDERER” across the front door of Kathy’s house.  Kathy’s friends are refusing to talk to her.  Detective Summers (Puja Uppal) is asking questions.  Noah claims that he’s innocent but even Kathy begins to have her doubts after she discovers just how angry Noah can get.  Noah’s father was abusivie.  Did Noah inherit the violence gene?

As I mentioned earlier, Noah is kind of a creep and it is easy to imagine circumstances in which he could be guilty.  The fact that Lifetime has lately featured several films featuring violent teenage boys also might lead one to suspect that Noah’s the killer.  Well, fear not.  This is a traditional Lifetime film and that means that Noah is not the murderer.  Instead, he’s just an obnoxious teenager who needs to treat his mom with more respect.  I will not spoil the movie by revealing the identity of the killer.  That said, you should be able to guess who it is because there’s not that many people in the movie.

Everyone Has Something To Hide!” the title announces and, as far as this film is concerned, I guess that’s true.  Considering that Noah’s a musician, they could have made just a few adjustments to the script and called this movie While My Guitar Gently Weeps.  As for the film itself, it suffers from a lack of likable characters.  (When I say that Noah’s a creep, I mean he is really a creep!)  But the film does deserve credit for fully embracing the melodrama.  The film has it’s flaws but it still held my attention for 88 minutes.

Relentless (1948, directed by George Sherman)


Earlier today, I was searching for an old Johnny Mack Brown Western called Fronteir Agent.  I found a video on YouTube that claimed to be an upload of Frontier Agent but, when I started watching it, I discovered that the movie, while a western, was definitely not a Johnny Mack Brown programmer.  Instead, it was a movie called Relentless and it was about as different from Johnny Mack Brown’s cheery B-westerns as you could get.

Robert Young plays Nick Buckley, a drifter who is more comfortable riding the range than spending time with “civilzation.”  He rides into town on a rainy night, looking for shelter for him both him and his pregnant mare.  At the local saloon, two prospectors invite him to stay at their cabin for the night.  Another man, Tex (Barton MacLane), suggests that Nick and his mare should instead stay in Tex’s stables.  Tex isn’t just being altruistic.  He and Jim (Frank Fenton) murder the prospectors at their cabin and steal their map to a gold mine.  Tex then kills Jim and frames Nick for all three of the murders.  The entire town wants to either hang Nick or turn him in for the reward or force him to draw the map that they think he killed the prospectors for.  Only the owner of the traveling general store, Luella (Marguerite Chapman), believes Nick when he says that he’s been framed.

Dark and moody, Relentless is almost as much of a film noir as a western.  At first, Robert Young seems like a strange choice to play a drifter but he actually does a good job of showing how Nick is someone who has spent so much time on the frontier that he’s not really sure how to deal with civilization.  One reason that Tex is able to frame Nick is because Nick is a stranger.  He has no history and, at first, his main concerns seems to be taking care of his mare and her foal.  Nick was unlucky enough to ride into town at the wrong time and soon, he’s worth more dead than alive.  Nick’s quest to both clear his name and get revenge becomes an obsession (you might even call it relentless) and it takes him from the town to a barren desert.

One thing that sets this western apart from so many others is the relationship between Nick and Louella.  Louella is also a loner but, as a store owner, she’s accepted by the town in a way that Nick is not.  Louella and Nick come across as two mature people who have been hardened by life in the old west but who still haven’t surrendered their morals to greed like so many other characters in the movie.

Relentless is a superior western, featuring good acting and interesting characters.  I may never find Frontier Agent but I’m glad I found Relentless.

 

Brad reviews KINJITE: FORBIDDEN SUBJECTS (1989), starring Charles Bronson!


Back when I was a teenager, I would always get the entertainment section out of my dad’s Sunday paper so I could check out the movie listings. I was mainly looking for information about my favorite movie star, Charles Bronson. Nowadays, we know about new movies months, even years, in advance, but back then I would learn about them from the entertainment section of dad’s paper. One Sunday in early 1989, when I was 15 years old, I saw an advertisement for a new Bronson film called KINJITE: FORBIDDEN SUBJECTS. It was the first time I had ever heard of it. I knew I wasn’t going to get to see it at the movies because it was only playing in Little Rock, but I was excited anyway because it would be on its way to video soon!

In the film, Bronson plays police Lieutenant Crowe. Along with his partner Eddie Rios (Perry Lopez), he deals with the sleaziest criminals in Los Angeles on a daily basis and it’s starting to take a toll on his personal life. He’s currently invested in bringing down an underage prostitution ring led by Duke (Juan Fernandez) and Lavonne (Sy Richardson). When Japanese businessman Hiroshi Hada’s (James Pax) young daughter is kidnapped by Duke, Crowe decides he must do everything in his power to get her back to her family.

KINJITE reunites Bronson with director J. Lee Thompson for the ninth and final time, bringing to an end what I think is one of the more underrated actor-director partnerships of the action genre. Bronson had first worked with Thompson on the fun mystery film ST. IVES at the peak of his 70’s career. By 1989, Bronson was in his late sixties and understandably slowing down on the action front, but he still possessed that unmistakable presence on screen. He’s more invested in his performance as the prejudicial Lt. Crowe than he’s usually given credit for. There’s one specific scene where he goes off on a group of Japanese businessmen and women who are holding up traffic in front of a large hotel. It’s one of Bronson’s strongest scenes of the 1980’s as he yells various traffic code violations, and obscenities, at the surprised guests. It’s a bad moment for his character, but a well-acted moment for Bronson.

None of Bronson’s ‘80’s action films were based on stories about sunshine and roses, but the subject matter of KINJITE is particularly dark and ugly. Themes of child exploitation, human trafficking, sexual violence, and prejudice are all given screen time in a world that’s so corrupt that only someone as committed as Lt. Crowe is even capable of taking on the evil that’s presented here. Crowe is not necessarily a good man, and his sense of justice goes completely overboard at times. For example, in one scene where he catches a pervert preparing to commit an assortment of depraved sexual acts on a young prostitute (played by Nicole Eggert), Crowe says “I’m going to show you what it feels like to be one of these girls,” and we, along with his partner, hear the screams off-screen as he honors his word. In another scene, he makes the pimp Duke eat a giant Rolex watch, which prompts the trafficker to say, “I’m gonna die…” None too concerned about Duke’s health, Crowe casually tells him, “No you won’t, but you will have to stick your head between your legs to tell the time.” This is not a well-adjusted human being, but with all the evil acts being committed around him, you still can’t help but root for the guy.

The supporting cast around Bronson is quite good. Juan Fernandez is a standout as the despicable pimp, Duke. There’s something about Fernandez that just makes him great as a bad guy, as he had proved a few years earlier in the Oliver Stone film SALVADOR. His character here has this odd energy about him that oozes evil. Veteran character actor Perry Lopez, who had worked with Bronson going all the way back to the 1954 western DRUM BEAT, provides the aging icon a solid partner who helps smooth out his character’s roughest edges. Their scenes together are very strong because they feel like two weary detectives and old friends trying to deal with a world they’re both sick of.

While I think Bronson provides a good performance and that Thompson provides solid direction, I wouldn’t rank KINJITE among the star’s best 80’s films. It tries to juggle a lot of difficult themes and wants to comment on cultural differences, built-in prejudices, and sexual deviance, and it also wants to deliver the kind of action that audiences expected from Bronson’s Cannon films. It’s a well-made film, but the results aren’t completely effective because it can’t find the right balance between the serious dramatic themes and the expected action heroics. In the end, the events depicted on screen are too disturbing for the film to qualify as fun, escapist entertainment, but they’re not handled with enough depth for the film to make any sort of serious statement. The film ends up making you pretty darn uncomfortable, so I don’t revisit it as often as I do other Bronson / Thompson collaborations like 10 TO MIDNIGHT and MURPHY’S LAW.  

Based on the dark subject matter I’ve described above, I can’t give KINJITE: FORBIDDEN SUBJECTS an unreserved recommendation like I do so many other Bronson films. But as the final collaboration between Bronson and J. Lee Thompson, it does carry a certain historical significance. And for fans interested in seeing the darker side of Bronson’s film career, it remains a memorable, and unsettling, final chapter in one of action cinema’s most enduring partnerships.

Review: The Hunted (dir. by William Friedkin)


“Once you are able to kill mentally, the physical part will be easy. The difficult part… is learning how to turn it off.” — L.T. Bonham

The Hunted (2003) is one of those films that feels like it slipped through the cracks of early 2000s cinema—a gritty, atmospheric thriller directed by William Friedkin, a filmmaker whose name alone should’ve guaranteed more attention. Friedkin, the man behind The French Connection and The Exorcist, has always had a knack for tension and raw, almost documentary-like realism, and The Hunted carries that same DNA. It’s not a perfect movie, but it’s a fascinating one, a slow-burn chase film that trades explosive set pieces for mood, character, and a kind of existential dread that lingers long after the credits roll.

The story follows L.T. Bonham, a former survival instructor played by Tommy Lee Jones, who’s called back to help the authorities when a series of brutal murders points to a former student of his, Aaron Hallam, played by Benicio del Toro. Hallam, a highly trained assassin, has gone rogue, and Bonham is the only one who can track him down. The premise is simple, almost minimalist: two men, one hunting the other, with the wilderness of the Pacific Northwest serving as their battleground. There’s no grand conspiracy, no world-ending stakes—just a personal, almost primal duel between mentor and protégé. The film’s strength lies in its refusal to overcomplicate things. It’s a character study disguised as a thriller, and it’s all the better for it.

What’s immediately striking about The Hunted is its pacing. Friedkin doesn’t rush. The film takes its time establishing Bonham’s world—a quiet, isolated life in the woods, where he trains soldiers in the art of survival and combat. There’s a sense of routine, of discipline, and when Hallam re-enters his life, it’s not with a bang but with a whisper. The first act is deliberate, almost meditative, as Bonham pieces together the clues and realizes the man he’s after isn’t just any killer, but someone he once shaped. This isn’t a film about action for action’s sake. It’s about the weight of violence, the cost of skill, and the thin line between hunter and hunted.

Benicio del Toro is the standout here. Hallam is a role that could’ve easily been reduced to a one-dimensional villain, but del Toro imbues him with a quiet, unsettling intensity. There’s a scene early on where Hallam, having just committed a particularly gruesome murder, calmly walks away from the crime scene, his face a mask of detached focus. It’s chilling not because he’s raging or unhinged, but because he’s so controlled. Hallam isn’t a monster in the traditional sense; he’s a man who’s been trained to kill and has embraced that role with terrifying efficiency. Del Toro plays him with a stillness that’s unnerving, his eyes always calculating, always three steps ahead. It’s a performance that relies more on presence than dialogue, and it’s one of his most underrated.

Tommy Lee Jones, on the other hand, is a different kind of compelling. Bonham is a man of few words, a hardened veteran who’s seen too much to be rattled by much. Jones, with his gravelly voice and weathered demeanor, sells the role of a man who’s spent a lifetime in the shadows. There’s a weariness to him, a sense that he’s not just chasing Hallam to stop the killings, but to confront his own past. The dynamic between the two is electric, even when they’re not in the same scene. Their eventual face-to-face encounters crackle with tension, not because of what they say, but because of what they don’t. These are two men who understand each other on a level that most people never will, and that mutual recognition makes their conflict all the more tragic.

Friedkin’s direction is, as always, masterful in its restraint. He’s never been one for flashy camerawork or overly stylized shots, and The Hunted is no exception. The cinematography is stark and functional, emphasizing the cold, unforgiving landscape of the Pacific Northwest. The forests, rivers, and small towns feel like characters in their own right, vast and indifferent to the human drama unfolding within them. There’s a scene where Bonham and a local sheriff, played by Connie Nielsen, track Hallam through the woods. The camera lingers on the trees, the mud, the rain—details that ground the film in a tangible, almost tactile reality. It’s not just a chase; it’s a test of endurance, both physical and psychological.

The film shares some striking thematic ground with First Blood, another story about soldiers haunted by what they’ve seen and done in war. Both films explore men who are not just racked with guilt but suffering from PTSD, their minds fractured by the horrors of combat. But where First Blood ultimately offered a glimmer of hope—that understanding and redemption might be possible—The Hunted takes a far bleaker view. Bonham and Hallam aren’t just damaged; they’re broken in ways that can’t be fixed. Hallam, in particular, represents the idea that some soldiers simply cannot come back from the brink of their experiences. There’s no catharsis for him, no moment of clarity or salvation. The film suggests that for some, the training and the trauma run too deep, and the only way out is through violence. It’s a brutal, unflinching perspective that sets The Hunted apart from more sentimental takes on the same themes.

The film’s action sequences, when they do arrive, are brutal and concise. There’s no shaky cam or rapid editing here—Friedkin lets the violence unfold in long, unflinching takes. A knife fight in a motel room is particularly memorable, not for its choreography, but for its rawness. It’s messy, desperate, and over in seconds. There’s no glorification, no slow-motion heroics. Just two men trying to kill each other in the most efficient way possible. It’s a far cry from the hyper-stylized action of the era, and it’s all the more effective for it.

Unfortunately, the film’s strengths are bogged down by its weaknesses, particularly in how it handles its secondary characters. The supporting cast, including Connie Nielsen as the sheriff, often feel thinly written, existing primarily as obstacles to delay the inevitable showdown between Bonham and Hallam. Their motivations and personalities are barely sketched out, making them feel more like narrative speed bumps than fully realized people. It’s frustrating because the film’s core dynamic is so compelling that these underdeveloped side characters only serve to slow down the momentum. And despite its brisk 90-plus minute runtime, The Hunted still manages to drag at times. The deliberate pacing that works so well in establishing atmosphere starts to feel indulgent when the story isn’t moving forward, leaving the audience waiting for the next meaningful interaction between its two leads.

If The Hunted has other weaknesses, it’s that it might be a little too restrained for some viewers. The slow burn won’t be for everyone, especially in an era where audiences have come to expect constant stimulation. The film demands patience, and those who aren’t willing to meet it on its terms might find it dull. There are also moments where the plot feels a bit thin, as if Friedkin and screenwriter Art Monterastelli were more interested in atmosphere than narrative complexity. But that’s also part of its charm. The Hunted isn’t trying to be a puzzle-box thriller or a high-octane spectacle. It’s a mood piece, a meditation on violence and the men who wield it.

The ending, without spoiling too much, is ambiguous in a way that feels true to the film’s themes. There’s no neat resolution, no easy answers. It’s a conclusion that lingers, forcing the audience to sit with the uncomfortable questions it raises. Is justice served? Is Hallam truly defeated, or is he just the first of many? The film doesn’t provide answers, and that’s to its credit. It’s more interested in the journey than the destination, in the hunt rather than the catch. While First Blood left room for healing, The Hunted closes the door on that possibility for some, reinforcing its bleak worldview.

In the grand scheme of Friedkin’s filmography, The Hunted might not rank alongside his most iconic works, but it’s a fascinating entry in his body of work. It’s a film that feels out of time, both in its style and its themes. Released in 2003, it arrived in a cinematic landscape dominated by CGI spectacle and franchise filmmaking, and it’s easy to see why it didn’t make a bigger splash at the time. But for those willing to seek it out, The Hunted is a hidden gem—a tense, thought-provoking thriller that rewards patience and close attention. It’s a film about the cost of violence, the weight of the past, and the thin line between the hunter and the hunted. And in an era where action movies often prioritize style over substance, its grounded, no-nonsense approach feels like a breath of fresh air.