Brad reviews THE SPECIALIST (1994), starring Sylvester Stallone, Sharon Stone, and James Woods!


When THE SPECIALIST came out back in ‘94, Sylvester Stallone was on a pretty good run of films, with his prior two movies being CLIFFHANGER and DEMOLITION MAN. I’m a fan of Stallone, but he wasn’t the main reason I went to see THE SPECIALIST at the movie theater. I went to see it because James Woods is in it. I’ve always been drawn to actors who are little different than your traditional Hollywood leading men. That’s why I’m especially fond of actors like Charles Bronson, Roy Scheider, and Woods. This was a point in Woods’ career where he seemed to be transitioning from a leading man to more supporting roles, but he still always brought his best to every performance. And anytime one of my favorite actors was in a movie, I was going to see it on the big screen.

Stallone plays Ray Quick, a former CIA explosives expert who now uses his unique set of skills to kill bad guys. His latest client is the extremely beautiful May Munro (Sharon Stone), who enlists his assistance in ridding the earth of Thomas Leon (Eric Roberts), a Miami mobster who murdered her parents when she was a girl. The problem… his former friend and now mortal enemy, Ned Trent (James Woods), works for the mobsters, led by patriarch Joe Leon (Rod Steiger). Nobody understands Quick like Trent, and with Munro having her own set of secrets, this job is going to be much more difficult than he imagined!

I won’t sit here and pretend that THE SPECIALIST is an incredible film. It’s very much a thriller of its time… with the humid Miami locations, oversized set pieces, lots of slo-mo, and even more double-crosses. It’s more melodramatic than I remember, but I probably appreciate that more now than I did then. It’s also impossible to look back on THE SPECIALIST and not remember where Sharon Stone was at that point in her career. Two years earlier, BASIC INSTINCT had made her one of the biggest stars in Hollywood. It felt like the pairing with Stallone was trying to recapture that magic, but it didn’t really work. There are a couple of sex scenes between the two, but director Luis Llosa is no Paul Verhoeven, so the scenes don’t share the same power. 

With Stallone’s controlled, some might say comatose, performance, the movie truly belongs to James Woods. His Ned Trent is cocky, sadistic, and entertaining. He attacks every scene with so much intensity that you can’t take your eyes off him and he easily steals the film. I also enjoyed the strong supporting cast. Rod Steiger doesn’t have that much screen time, but he brings an unmistakable energy to the role of crime boss Joe Leon. Then there’s Eric Roberts, whose sleazy performance as Tomas Leon adds another layer of intensity that tries to match Woods. The scenes involving Woods, Steiger, and Roberts are some of the best of the film.

Is THE SPECIALIST one of Stallone’s action classics? Definitely not, but looking back at the kind of movies we get served these days, I’d say it’s pretty darn entertaining. Stallone and Stone could have brought more personality to their characters, but James Woods just about makes up for them by delivering one of his most delightfully over-the-top villains. And it’s just fun seeing veterans like Rod Steiger and Eric Roberts bring their own talents to the proceedings. I miss the times when movies were full of big stars and unique character actors. Whether you love it or not, THE SPECIALIST is one of those movies that you took home from the video store on a Friday night, popped in the VCR, and proceeded to have a good weekend. I miss that era of movies, and I especially miss those interesting stars!

Scene That I Love: The Rocky III Training Montage


Today, we celebrate Sylvester Stallone’s birthday with one of the most definitive montages of the 1980s.  From 1982’s Rocky III (which was directed by Stallone himself), here is the famous Rocky/Apollo training montage.

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special Flag Day Edition


4 Or More Shots From 4 Or More Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

Happy Flag Day!  It’s time for….

4 Shots From 4 Films For Flag Day

Patton (1970, dir by Franklin J. Schaffner)

Rocky IV (1985, dir by Sylvester Stallone)

The Patriot (2000, dir by Roland Emmerich)

Marty Supreme (2025, dir by Josh Safdie)

Review: First Blood (dir. by Ted Kotcheff)


“In the field we had a code of honor: you watch my back, I watch yours. Back here there’s nothing!” — John Rambo

You sit down expecting a brainless 80s action flick, and instead you get a meditation on trauma, bureaucracy, and the American wilderness. That’s First Blood for you. Directed by Ted Kotcheff and released in 1982, this is the movie that introduced the world to John Rambo, but don’t go in hoping for a body count or one-liners. What you actually get is a lean, gritty, and surprisingly sad drama about a guy who just wants to eat a hot meal and ends up accidentally declaring war on an entire small-town police force. And honestly? It holds up to this day. The film is adapted from David Morrell’s 1972 novel of the same name, but if you’ve read the book, you’ll notice some serious tonal differences right away. Morrell’s novel is bleak, brutal, and deeply nihilistic—a product of its era’s raw disillusionment with Vietnam. Kotcheff and Stallone sanded down some of those rougher edges, not to sell out, but to make Rambo a more sympathetic figure. The bones are the same, but the spirit is just a little warmer, and that choice changes everything.

Let’s break down the plot, because it’s deceptively simple. Sylvester Stallone plays John Rambo, a former Green Beret and Vietnam War hero who wanders into the town of Hope, Washington, looking for a fellow soldier he served with. He finds out the guy died of cancer from Agent Orange exposure. That’s the first gut punch. Rambo, already drifting and clearly struggling with PTSD, just wants to grab some food and keep moving. But the local sheriff, Will Teasle (a perfectly cast Brian Dennehy), takes one look at Rambo’s long hair, army jacket, and tired face and decides he’s a vagrant who needs to be run out of town. From a structural standpoint, Teasle isn’t a cartoon villain—he’s a classic dramatic antagonist: a rigid, small-town authoritarian who sees drifters as a threat to his orderly world. That realism makes the whole thing sting because you can almost see both sides. Almost.

When Teasle tries to escort Rambo to the city limits, Rambo walks back into town. That’s his big crime. He gets arrested, and at the station, the deputies start pushing him around. One of them, a veteran deputy named Galt (played with sneering menace by Jack Starrett), is the real problem here. Galt isn’t some young hothead. He’s an older, seasoned deputy who’s clearly been in his role for years, and he’s become entitled on the power of his badge. You can see it in the way he leans into the booking process, the casual cruelty in his eyes, the way he treats Rambo like a stray dog he’s finally allowed to kick. During the shaving scene, as deputies try to clean Rambo up after the arrest, Galt is the one who holds Rambo down, restraining him while another deputy wields the straight razor. He’s not waving the razor himself, but that almost makes it worse—he’s the enforcer, the guy who pins you in place while someone else does the dirty work. It’s a veteran cop who knows exactly how to exert control without getting his own hands bloody. That makes Galt far more chilling than some screaming bully. He represents the rot of unchecked authority, the way small-town power can curdle into casual sadism over time. And that whole humiliating process—being held down, having a straight razor brought to his face—triggers a full-blown flashback for Rambo. Then something clicks. Rambo explodes, beats down half the station, and escapes into the nearby mountains.

Now the hunt begins. Teasle calls in the State Patrol, the National Guard, and eventually his old mentor, Colonel Trautman (Richard Crenna), who knows exactly what kind of animal they’re chasing. Trautman warns Teasle that Rambo isn’t just a drifter; he’s a trained killer with a “purple heart, a silver star, and a congressional Medal of Honor.” And here’s the core irony: Rambo doesn’t want to hurt anyone. He just wants to be left alone. But the chase escalates, people die, and by the end, you’re not cheering for the hero to win—you’re hoping he gets some peace.

From an analysis perspective, where First Blood really earns its stripes is its restraint. The action sequences are tense but never escalate into cartoon violence. Rambo uses the forest like a ghost, setting traps, crawling through mud, and surviving on raw squirrel meat. He doesn’t mow down dozens of cops with a machine gun. In fact, the only person he kills is Galt, who falls to his death while hanging off a helicopter because Rambo throws a rock at the chopper. And Rambo immediately looks horrified. That’s the key. Even Galt, as entitled and cruel as he is, isn’t a villain Rambo wants to execute. The kill is accidental, a desperate act of survival. The movie takes its time showing how the very skills that made Rambo a hero in Vietnam—his survival instincts, his aggression, his ability to turn anything into a weapon—now make him a monster in peacetime America. The local cops are out of their depth, but aside from Galt, they’re mostly just scared men doing a job. Nobody else is pure evil. Just broken systems and broken people.

But let’s talk about that novel, because the comparison is crucial for understanding the film’s choices. David Morrell’s First Blood is a much darker animal. In the book, Rambo is more feral, less a wounded hero and more a walking death sentence. He kills multiple cops, not by accident or in self-defense, but with cold, tactical efficiency. The novel has no Colonel Trautman to serve as a moral anchor—Trautman is there, but he’s just as ruthless. And the ending? Devastating. In Morrell’s version, Rambo and Teasle essentially murder each other in a final, bloody standoff. Trautman finishes Rambo off with a shotgun blast to the gut. There’s no catharsis, no plea for understanding. Just bodies and regret. The tone is nihilistic to the core: the system destroyed these men long before the first page, and there was never any hope. Kotcheff’s film pulls back from that abyss. It keeps the violence lean and mostly off-screen. It gives Rambo that famous final monologue where he sobs about his friend dying next to him, about protesters spitting on him, about not being able to turn off the war inside his head. That scene isn’t in the book—not like that. The movie says, “This man is suffering, and maybe he can still be saved.” The novel says, “This man is already dead, and he’s taking everyone with him.” Both are valid responses to Vietnam, but the film’s slightly toned-down approach is why Rambo became an icon instead of a footnote.

From a performance standpoint, Stallone gives the work of his career here. Forget the grunting one-liners of later sequels. In First Blood, he barely speaks, and when he does, his voice cracks. Watch his eyes during that final monologue. After Trautman finally talks him down, Rambo dissolves into a sob. “Nothing is over!” he screams at Trautman. “You don’t just turn it off!” It’s raw, uncomfortable, and genuinely moving. You realize that the whole movie has been one long panic attack for this character. The Rambo that pops up in Rambo: First Blood Part II is a cartoon superhero. The Rambo here is a guy who needed a therapist and a hug about thirty years ago. That vulnerability is the film’s great deviation from the source material. Morrell’s Rambo never asks for understanding. Kotcheff’s does. And that small shift in tone—from nihilism to wounded humanity—is what elevates the film from a grim exploitation picture to a legitimate character study.

On the technical side, Ted Kotcheff’s direction is patient and atmospheric. He shoots the Pacific Northwest like a character—vast, wet, dark, and full of hiding places. The chase scenes are grounded, with long takes and practical stunts. When Rambo jumps off a cliff into a tree and lands with a thud that sounds real, it hurts. There’s no CGI safety net. Jerry Goldsmith’s score is mournful, with lonely woodwinds and a simple, haunting main theme that never pumps you up for a fight. It just makes you sad. The movie even has the guts to end on a downer—but not as brutal as the book’s. Rambo surrenders, crying in Trautman’s arms, and the final shot is him walking away in handcuffs into the rain. No freeze-frame high five. No sequel tease. Just rain. And yet, compared to the novel’s blood-soaked finale, that rain feels almost like mercy. That’s tonal balancing at its finest: the film acknowledges the darkness without drowning in it.

Of course, the cultural memory of First Blood has been completely buried by its sequels. Most people under thirty know Rambo as the muscle-bound machine gun guy from memes and video games. But the original is closer to a western like The Deer Hunter meets a paranoid 70s thriller like The French Connection. It’s a movie about a country that used its soldiers and then discarded them. Teasle represents the willful ignorance of middle America—“I don’t care about your war” is basically his attitude. And Rambo represents the bill coming due. Galt, as that entitled veteran deputy, represents the everyday cruelty of those who’ve held power too long and forgotten what it’s for—the guy who doesn’t need to swing the blade because he’s the one holding you still. That theme hits even harder today, decades later, when veterans are still fighting for basic support and stories of badge-heavy misconduct still dominate headlines. The novel took that theme to its logical, horrific conclusion: no survivors, no lessons learned. The film pulls back just enough to let you breathe, and that one small change turned First Blood from a bleak cult artifact into a mainstream classic. You can argue which version is more honest. But you can’t argue that Stallone and Kotcheff made the right call for the screen.

First Blood rules. It’s a rainy, sad, surprisingly smart action movie that will stick with you longer than any explosion-fest. It’s also a masterclass in adaptation, showing how a slight shift in tone—from nihilistic to wounded—can transform a story without betraying its core. Brian Dennehy is perfect as the stubborn but not evil sheriff. Jack Starrett makes Galt a quietly terrifying portrait of bureaucratic sadism, a veteran deputy who’s learned to love the leash and the privilege of pinning a man down while someone else does the cutting. Richard Crenna brings real weight as Trautman, a father figure who knows he helped raise a weapon he can no longer control. And Stallone acts his soul out. When he whispers “I could have killed them all” in the final scene, he’s not bragging. He’s confessing. That’s why First Blood is a classic. It’s not a recruitment poster. It’s a eulogy—just a little less hopeless than the novel that birthed it. Four stars, easily. Just don’t go in expecting explosions every five minutes. Go in expecting to feel bad, and you’ll leave feeling like you watched something real.

Film Review: Rambo: First Blood Part II (dir by George Pan Cosmatos)


Three years after blowing up the town of Hope, John Rambo (Sylvester Stallone) is …. workin’ on the chain gang…. (I hope you sang it.)  However, Colonel Sam Trautman (Richard Crenna) has a suggestion for Rambo.  He can get a full pardon if he infiltrates Vietnam and investigates what might be a POW camp….

So begins 1985’s Rambo: First Blood Part II!

When viewers first met John Rambo in 1982’s First Blood, he was a drifter who was obviously uncomfortable with dealing with other people.  Haunted by both his experiences in Vietnam and the way he was treated when he returned to his own country, Rambo was someone who largely wanted to be left alone.  He was the ultimate outsider.  When he asked Brian Dennehy’s Sherriff Teasle where he could get a cop of coffee, Teasle told him to go over the border and have his coffee in Canada.  (Is there anything more insulting than to tell a Vietnam veteran to go to Canada like a draft dodger?)  Rambo was someone who could take care of himself.  He was someone who knew how to survive in the wilderness.  But, in the first movie, he was not superhuman.  Rambo was considerably banged up by the end of First Blood.  The other thing that is sometimes overlooked is that, as far as his time in Hope was concerned, Rambo never deliberately killed anyone.  The only person who died in First Blood was a sadistic police officer who was so determined to get a shot at Rambo that he accidentally tumbled out of a helicopter.  When Rambo fought, it was in self-defense.  Rambo had plenty of opportunities (and, by today’s cultural standards, reasons) to kill Sheriff Teasle and his deputies but he didn’t.  Things are a bit different in the sequel.  Rambo: First Blood Part II transforms Rambo from a relatively realistic character into the comic book action hero that everyone knows today.  Rambo’s gone from being a hulking drifter to being a muscle-bound warrior.

The film doesn’t waste any time getting Rambo out of prison and over to Thailand.  The obviously duplicitous Murdock (Charles Napier) tells Rambo that his mission is solely to take pictures and not to engage with the enemy.  (You may be wondering why anyone would recruit Rambo for a mission that doesn’t involve engaging with the enemy and it’s a fair question.)  Soon, Rambo is in the jungles of Vietnam, meeting up with a rebel named Co (Julia Nickson), and heading up river with a bunch of pirates.  Needless to say, Rambo is soon engaging with the enemy.

Rambo: First Blood Part II is an undeniably crude film.  Clocking in at 96 minutes, the film makes it clear that it doesn’t have any time to waste with characterization or debate.  Sylvester Stallone rewrote James Cameron’s original script and he gives a performance that has little of the nuance that was present in the first film.  And yet, the film has an undeniable hypnotic power to it.  It’s pure action.  Rambo exists to blow up his enemies, whether it’s with a gun or an explosive arrow or the missiles fired from a stolen helicopter.  Because the bad guys are all arrogant sadists who exist to remind American viewers of the humiliation of its first military defeat, there’s an undeniable pleasure in watching them get defeated by one motivated warrior who refuses to be held back by the paper pushers in charge.  Murdock tells Rambo not to rescue any POWs.  Rambo responds by machine gunning Murdock’s office.  It’s pure wish fulfillment and it is cathartic to watch.  It’s perhaps even more cathartic to watch today, after the twin traumas of the COVID lockdowns and the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan.  Murdock becomes a stand-in for every incompetent bureaucrat who ever let America down.  The Murdock who tells Rambo not to rescue any Americans is little different from the men who told business that they had to close and who tried to dictate whether or not people could leave their homes.  The Murdock who was prepared to leave American behind is the same person who did leave Americans behind in Kabul.  Rambo’s anger is the anger of everyone who values freedom above obedience.

Rambo kills a lot of people in the sequel but none of them are American.  He’s a patriot, albeit an angry one who will never forgive his country for not caring about its veterans as much as they cared about it.  “Do we get to win this time?” Rambo ask Trautman and it’s a moment that, like much of the movie, is both crudely simplistic but is powerful in its refusal to be complicated.  Rambo: First Blood Part II is a fantasy but it’s also a plea to be allowed to succeed.  Forget the rules.  Forget the regulations.  Just allow the people to win.

Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985, dir by George Pan Cosmatos, DP: Jack Cardiff)

Film Review: Armor (dir by Justin Routt)


In rural Alabama, James Brody (Jason Patric) is a recovering alcoholic who makes his living as an armored truck driver.  He works with his son, Casey (Josh Wiggins).  Every day, James and Casey transport millions from bank to bank and usually, they’re able to do it without incident.  However, this day is different.  James and Casey find themselves trapped on a bridge with a team of thieves on every side of them.  James and Casey struggle to escape while working out their own personal issues.

Sylvester Stallone receives top billing in 2024’s Armor and, just by looking at the poster, you would probably be excused for assuming that Stallone was playing the hero of the film.  Instead, Stallone only has a few minutes of screentime and he plays one of the criminals, a tough guy named Rook.  Rook may be a professional thief but he has a conscience and he doesn’t believe in killing anyone who doesn’t need to be killed.  That sets him apart from the rest of the thieves.

One may wonder what a star like Stallone is doing in a low-budget, direct-to-video film like this.  The answer is that Armor was produced by Randall Emmett, a producer who specializes in getting big names to appear in small roles in B-movies.  Not much money may have gone into the budget of Armor but one can be sure but the majority of it was used to pay Stallone’s salary.  According to some comments left on Letterboxd by someone who claims to have worked on the film’s crew, Stallone shot his scenes in one day and was deliberately kept in the dark about the fact that the film was actually being directed by Emmett and not the credited Justin Routt.  Now, whether or not any of that is true, I can’t definitely say for sure.  However, it definitely has the ring of truth.  Randall Emmett himself is best known for producing many of Bruce Willis’s final films.  With Willis having retired and John Travolta perhaps busy, Sylvester Stallone ended up as Emmett’s star-in-name-only for Armor.

Give credit where credit is due.  Stallone dominates the few scenes in which he appears.  For all the criticism that Stallone has taken over the course of his career, this film reminds us that there’s no other actor who has quite the same screen presence as Sylvester Stallone.  As for the rest of the cast, Jason Patric is convincing as the haunted James.  Unfortunately, the film can never make up its mind whether or not it wants to be an action flick or a relationship drama.  Patric does his best but he’s let down by a script that never seem to be quite sure what it wants to say.

I appreciated that this film took place in the South.  The film opens with a news report about an armored truck crash in Dallas and, as soon as they mentioned the Thornton Freeway, I was like, “I was stuck there just a few days ago!”  The majority of the film takes place on a bridge in Alabama.  The scenery is lovely, even when the action is hackneyed.

6 Actors Who I Hope Will Win An Oscar In The Next Ten Years


Ethan Hawke

I should begin by saying that there’s a good chance that Ethan Hawke will win an Oscar later tonight.  He’s been nominated for Blue Moon.  When this Oscar season began, he was definitely the front runner.  As of late, the momentum seems to have shifted toward Michael B. Jordan or perhaps Timothee Chalamet but still, one should not totally discount Hawke’s chances.  If Hawke does lose tonight, I have no doubt that he will be nominated in the future and eventually, he will win.  It’ll be long overdue.  As you can probably guess by the picture at the start of this post, I’m one of those people who thinks that he definitely should have won for Boyhood.

Colin Farrell

Colin Farrell finally received his first Oscar nomination for The Banshees of Inisherin but he lost the award to Brendan Fraser.  Farrell is not an actor who has always gotten the respect that he deserves.  Especially early in his career, he was often miscast.  Much like Matthew McConaughey, he was often dismissed as just being a pretty boy until he met a director — in this case, Martin McDonagh — who truly understood how to best utilize Farrell’s screen presence.  As In Bruges, Banshees and The Penguin showed, Farrell is essentially a character actor in a leading man’s body.  My hope is that Farrell will win his first Oscar between now and 2036 and that he’ll give a memorable acceptance speech.

Brendan Gleeson

Speaking of The Banshees of Inisherin, how does Brandan Gleeson only have one Oscar nomination to his name?  Now, to be clear, I don’t begrudge the fact that Gleeson lost to Ke Huy Quan.  Quan had a wonderful personal story, gave the best performance in the overrated mess that was Everything Everywhere All At Once, and his acceptance speech was truly touching.  That said, my sincere hope is that the Academy understands that Gleeson is long overdue an Oscar.  Hopefully, that will be corrected soon.

Kurt Russell

Kurt Russell is one of those actors who I just can’t believe has never been nominated.  In a few days, Kurt Russell will be turning 75.  He’s been a popular actor for most of his life but he’s not getting any younger.  So, get with it, Academy!  I don’t care what his next film is.  I don’t care how big the role is.  Give Kurt Russell his Oscar!

Tom Cruise

Tom Cruise has had an interesting career.  He went from being a teen idol to a character actor to a somewhat disreputable celebrity to finally reemerging with the Mission Impossible films as one of our last true movie stars.  One need only watch Top Gun: Maverick to see the type of charisma that we’re going to miss once it’s gone.  Later this year, Cruise will be starring in Digger.

Sylvester Stallone

Seriously, how many times does this man have to play Rocky and Rambo before the Academy finally gives him the award that everyone secretly wants him to win?  Give Stallone his Oscar!

Scenes That I Love: Rambo Rages In Rambo: First Blood Part II


Today’s scene that I love comes from the 1985 film, Rambo: First Blood Part II.  In this scene, Sylvester Stallone’s John Rambo — having survived being abandoned yet again in Vietnam — let’s the CIA knew exactly what he thinks about their operation.  As directed by George Pan Cosmatos and performed by Stallone, this scene is pure 80s action.

If you ever meet James Cameron, remind him that he wrote the script for this film and see how he reacts.

Here’s a scene that I love: