In his mansion in Alabama, fashion photographer Jack B. Rippington (Blake Bahner) kills people in ways that are cruel and grotesque. He does it with a smile on his face and a spring in his step, and he always remembers to take pictures first because, I guess, he really does take the whole fashion photographer thing seriously. He has standards. He’s a professional. When he meets and starts dating a model named Erica (Ena Henderson), she soon finds herself unwittingly leading victims to their doom.
Why is Jack B. Rippington so obsessed with murdering anyone who comes by his house? Well, you could say that it runs in the family. He’s the great-grandson of Jack the Ripper. He informs the audience of this. Myself, I have to wonder if Rippington is a family name or if it’s just his nom de meurtre. If Jack the Ripper’s last name really was Rippington, that would be a hell of a coincidence, and it would also show that Scotland Yard really wasn’t doing a very good job of investigating the crimes at Whitechapel. I mean, why did they devote so much time to investigating poor Montague John Druitt when there was a guy named Rippington wandering around?
Of course, it’s also possible that Jack the Ripper moved to the United States, had a daughter, and then she married someone named Rippington. Still, that seems like it would be an amazing coincidence.
(For the record, the real Jack the Ripper was some guy that you’ve never heard of and who probably died without ever telling anyone the truth. The fact that he was never captured would seem to indicate that the police were investigating the wrong suspects. And don’t start in with any of that royal conspiracy nonsense either. Honestly, that’s one of the silliest theories that I’ve ever heard.)
Anyway, where was I? Oh yeah, Fatal Exposure. Fatal Exposure is a shot-on-video epic that has some surprisingly effective gore effects. Between burning people with acid and chopping off their heads, Jack B. Rippington really gets into his work, and the results are often difficult to look at. If I were to compare this to any other film, it would probably be William Lustig’s Maniac, which featured Joe Spinell playing an equally homicidal photographer whose crimes seemed to owe more than a little to Jack the Ripper. Of course, Jack B. Rippington is much more handsome than Joe Spinell was in Maniac. If Maniac was a plunge into darkness and a trip to the realm of absolute zero, Fatal Exposure tries to be a bit of a comedic romp. Jack B. Rippington may be a murderer, but he also enjoys talking to the audience. In its use of dark humor and its breaking of the fourth wall, the film has quite a bit in common with Lucio Fulci’s Touch of Death.
There’s not really much of a plot to Fatal Exposure. Jack B. Rippington takes pictures of women in lingerie. He kills anyone who comes to the house. Erica eventually gets suspicious. But director Peter B. Good keeps the action moving, and it looks surprisingly good for a SOV film. (Good was best-known as a cinematographer.) Blake Bahner gives a good performance as Jack B. Rippington. It’s not a film for everyone, but, at the very least, it feels like a real movie. That puts it ahead of most SOV productions.
The Leprechaun (Warwick Davis) is back! He’s abandoned North Dakota for Los Angeles, and now he’s looking for Bridget Callum (Shevonne Durkin), the descendant of a woman to whom he was promised centuries ago. The Leprechaun knows how to hold a grudge. Bridget already has a boyfriend named Cody Ingalls (Charlie Heath), who gives tours of celebrity cemeteries for Morty Ingalls (Sandy Baron).
Leprechaun 2 is significantly better than the first Leprechaun, if only because dark and grim Los Angeles seems like a better location for the story than North Dakota. Leprechaun 2 doesn’t get as much attention as the first one because it doesn’t feature Jennifer Aniston, but it does feature Shevonne Durkin, and any ’90s kid can tell you that’s almost as good. The Leprechaun is even nastier in the second film than he was in the first, and Warwick Davis continues to show an admirable dedication to bringing the character to life.
This film is also gorier than the first Leprechaun. The first Leprechaun was made with a younger audience in mind, even if it was an R-rated movie. Leprechaun 2 was clearly made to appeal to the type of teenagers who have always wondered what would happen if someone mistook a lawn mower for a Shevonne Durkin. For me, the most memorable scene is Morty making the mistake of wishing for a pot of gold and then discovering that it’s in his stomach. The Leprechaun offers to dig it out. That scene really stuck with me when I was a kid.
The Leprechaun would have more adventures, but this one was the best.
With October being a fun month for horror, I’ve been searching for some scary movies that I’ve never seen before. As I was browsing the horror genre on Tubi the other day, I came across this little Canadian movie called DEATH WEEKEND. Also known as “The House by the Lake,” I noticed it has a simple story, a solid cast and a short running time. I decided to give it a shot.
The movie opens with a playboy dentist named Harry (Chuck Shamata from DEATH WISH 5) and his fashion model girlfriend Diane (Brenda Vaccaro) driving out to his countryside home for a weekend getaway. While on the way, they cross paths with a group of crazy, drunk guys in a fast car, led by Lep (Don Stroud), and end up engaging in a dangerous game of road rage. They’re finally able to give them the slip, but they’ve made some enemies who are determined to find them and get even. When they track the couple to the home, the weekend is now set for death!
I have to admit I was very uncomfortable with this one from the very beginning. The guys are truly awful. Lep and the drunken thugs terrorize the couple on the road for no other reason than they can. And when the couple gets away, with a woman behind the wheel, no less, they use this as an excuse to track them to the home, and this is where things get really disturbing. They are cruel, vicious people, and the movie doesn’t give us any more information about them. They just seem to enjoy rape and murder. This nihilistic behavior seemed to go on and on and was hard for me to watch.
There’s no hope for Harry, either. He had lied to Diane about the entire weekend. They were supposed to be there with other couples, but Harry had set the whole thing up for them to be alone just so he could get laid. What a jerk! And when the thugs take over, he’s a perfect coward much more worried about his safety and his property than he is about Diane. I can understand being scared and wanting to survive, but he’s revealed as a completely selfish person and about as unlikable as it gets.
The only person who has a shred of humanity in this film is Diane. Of course, this being a 70’s movie, she’s terrorized, abused, and raped. I know I may be coming off as a hypocrite, because I love Charles Bronson and his DEATH WISH franchise notoriously features brutal scenes of rape. Well, those scenes are sickening to me, and I don’t like to watch them. And I didn’t like watching this one either. This movie seemed to revel in cruelty for the sake of cruelty and nothing else. I won’t say that I didn’t enjoy it when she finally gets a chance to get some revenge, but I wish the movie had given us more time to enjoy it. After everything she goes through, I wanted a little more satisfaction out of seeing her fight back. I will give the movie props for one impressive throat slash death, though.
I did think that the actors were fine in their various roles. Don Stroud was effectively crazy as the lead murderer / rapist, Chuck Shamata made me really dislike his lecherous liar, and you can’t help but pull for Brenda Vaccaro after what she goes through. But at the end of the day, I can’t say that I enjoyed the movie that surrounded them very much. This movie presented relentless cruelty for most of its run time before finally giving Diane a few minutes to try to get some payback. Not only did the movie make me uncomfortable, it also left me feeling unsatisfied.
Oh, Twilight! How we missed you, with your blue-tinted view of the world and your romantic bloodsuckers!
After her mother remarries a minor-league baseball player, 17-year-old Bella (Kristen Stewart) moves from sunny Arizona to gray, wet Washington State. She lives with her father, the police chief (Billy Burke), and starts at a new school. Her friend is played by Anna Kendrick! How cool is that? She has a crush on Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson), and Edward has a crush on her, but Edward’s also a vampire, and he’s been seventeen since the Spanish flu epidemic. Bella discovers that she loves Edward, Edward loves Bella, and Edward’s family loves Bella, but there’s a group of vampires who want to feast on Bella. Also, Bella’s friend Jacob (Taylor Lautner) doesn’t like Edward, but we won’t find out the full details about all that until the next movie!
Lisa and I watched Twilight on Netflix earlier today, and yeah, it’s bad, but it’s just so addictive that you can’t look away. Even today, it’s hard to know whether to laugh or swoon. I usually end up doing both because the longing and smoldering way that Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson look at each other makes up for the fact that it’s a long movie where not much really happens. I was so excited waiting for the baseball scene, but I had forgotten how long it takes before Edward’s adopted family plays vampire baseball in the middle of a storm. Sign them all up for the Rangers, I don’t care if they glow. A sensitive ball player? Go ahead and bite my neck! Edward might seem mopey but when Bella needs to be protected from the other vampires, he and his father (Peter Facinelli) are right there and showing they know what to do. He’s a fighter, that Edward Cullen! And he’s a dream of a prom date too.
Twilight is what it is, and everyone who makes fun of it has a point, but I don’t care. I’ll be watching the second movie tomorrow.
In 2020’s Killer Prom, Yvonne Zima plays Sienna. Poor Sienna is desperately struggling with her life. She has a cheap apartment that she still can’t really afford. Her mother wants nothing to do with her. She hasn’t had much of a romantic life since missing her high school prom. She’s very jealous of her distant cousin, Hannah (Megan Vincent). Hannah is married to Dr. Tony Wilson (Mark Lutz), a man on whom Sienna has always had a crush. So, Sienna drowns Hannah at the family reunion and then moves to Texas so she can be close to Tony and his family.
Sienna not only wants to marry Tony. She also wants to help Tony’s teenage daughter, Maya (Erica Anderson), have a great prom night! In fact, Sienna has it all perfectly planned out. While Maya is off at prom, Tony will be so moved by his love for Sienna that he’ll ask her to marry him. The only problem is that Maya instantly notices that something is off about Sienna and she really doesn’t want her anywhere near her prom or her date, Jake (Kyle Meagher). Meanwhile, Tony is too busy mourning his wife to fall in love with anyone. And even if Tony was going to fall in love with anyone, it would probably be his assistant, Lauren (Brianna Barnes).
Oh, Sienna hates Lauren. When Lauren shows up at a barbecue, Sienna has to duck into the bathroom so she can ask her reflection, “Who wears a red dress to a barbecue!?” Really, Sienna? Who wears a red dress to a barbecue? I WEAR A RED DRESS TO A BARBECUE! You have a problem with me!? That said, Lauren’s dress is a little bit too expensive for a barbecue. Barbecues can get messy as anyone who has seen that picture of James Talarico sinking his teeth into those ribs can tell you.
Anyway, it’s a Lifetime film so Sienna loses it. She goes from wanting to marry Tony and become Maya’s stepmother to wanting to kill them both and does it pretty quickly. Of course, it’s up to Maya to save the family, even if that means missing her own prom. Don’t count on Tony to do anything. Tony is bizarrely clueless, even though it’s pretty much obvious from the start that Sienna has some issues. Men in Lifetime films never stop to think that the attractive woman who was the last person to see their wife before her mysterious death could possibly be a troublemaker.
I really enjoyed Killer Prom, mostly because I went to prom every year that I was in high school and I had a blast each time. Movies like this pretty much live and die based on how effective the actress playing the psycho is and Yvonne Zima gives a wonderfully unhinged performance as Sienna. She’s just so incredibly excited about the prom! It’s hard not to feel bad for her when it becomes clear that she’s going to end up missing another one.
Fortunately, you can currently stream Brian De Palma’s Carrie (1976)and, if you haven’t seen it, you really do have an obligation to do so. Flanagan needs 8 hours to tell his story. De Palma only needed 98 minutes and a cast that could actually deliver their lines in something that wasn’t a robotic drone. The film works because De Palma never feels the need to apologize for making a horror film. It also works because it actually has a nicely macabre sense of humor, something that’s lacking in both King’s novel and Flanagan’s work in general. The film is currently on Prime.
The Rage: Carrie 2 (1999) doesn’t get much respect from a lot of horror fans but I’ve always liked it. Interestingly, The Rage actually covers some of the same thematic ground as Flanagan’s adaptation. The difference is that, once again, it only needs 105 minutes to make its point and it doesn’t apologize for being a horror film. The scene where the football players go crazy while getting their heads shaved (and, in the process, become indistinguishable from one another) is surprisingly disturbing. The finale, where Rachel goes on a rampage, is effectively violent and horrific, even if it can’t match the power of De Palma’s prom. I was scared to wear my reading glasses after watching this movie. Emily Bergl gives a good performance as Rachel. Jason London sells the film’s final scene. The oldest son from Home Improvement loses his testicles in closeup. Be careful with those spearguns! The film is on Prime.
Evilspeak (1981) is the film that asks, “What if Carrie was a guy and what if he was a student at a military academy and what if he got his powers from a personal computer and what if he was played by Clint Howard?” That’s a lot of questions but, for the most part, the answers are all entertaining in their own demented way. Evilspeak is interesting because Stanley Coopersmith (played by the great Clint Howard) is not particularly sympathetic but his tormentors are so much worse that you still feel Stanley deserved his revenge and you don’t mind when the cannibal pigs show up. This is also an example of one of my favorite mini-genres, the killer computer film. I guess that people in the early 80s though you could do anything with a computer, even summon the denizens of the damned. The film is on Prime.
The Fury (1979) was De Palma’s follow-up to Carrie and I have to admit that I’m not a huge fan of this film. That said, I know that the film does have its fans. The fact that I’m listing it here shows just how much I’m currently disliking Flanagan’s Carrie. I’d even rather rewatch The Fury then suffer another minute of the new Carrie! That said, The Fury is occasionally interesting. De Palma mashes up a lot of genres. Kirk Douglas grimaces as if the world depended upon it. Amy Irving takes the film a bit too seriously, as if she expected to follow in the footsteps of Sissy Spacek and receive an Oscar nomination for playing a telekinetic teen. Carrie Snodgress is annoying but then her character dies in slow motion. Never let “Here comes The Pony Express!” by your final words. John Cassavetes later said he did the film for the money. Bless him. The film is on Prime.
“The genitals are the door to evil!” — Mother Vincenza
The convent in Bruno Mattei’s The Other Hell feels less like a refuge from the world than a place where all its worst impulses have been locked inside. This ragged slice of Italian horror turns a religious sanctuary into a pressure cooker of Catholic guilt, supernatural menace, and institutional cruelty. It is messy, frequently ridiculous, and occasionally more confusing than frightening, but there is something appealing about its complete lack of restraint. Mattei throws so much sinister religious imagery at the screen that even the quieter scenes feel contaminated. This is not elegant Gothic horror. It is nunsploitation with dirty fingernails, steeped in the lurid sensibility of the Italian horror scene of the late ’70s and early ’80s.
The story centers on an isolated convent where disturbing incidents and violent deaths suggest that something evil has taken up residence. A priest arrives to investigate, but getting answers proves difficult when the Mother Superior treats every question like an attack on her authority. The convent’s inhabitants seem caught between fear, obedience, and knowledge they would rather keep buried. That gives the film a decent mystery beneath all the supernatural theatrics. Is the danger coming from an outside force, or has it grown out of the cruelty already hiding behind these walls? Mattei is not particularly careful about developing that question, but it gives the surrounding madness something to hang onto.
As a prime example of nunsploitation, The Other Hell understands the appeal of turning a supposedly sacred environment into a breeding ground for corruption. Religious devotion and institutional repression become difficult to separate, while images normally associated with comfort acquire an ugly edge. Habits, crucifixes, candles, and chapel interiors stop suggesting refuge and start looking like accessories in a nightmare. The film belongs comfortably to that late-’70s and early-’80s Italian exploitation tradition of borrowing familiar horror ingredients and making them nastier. Possession-movie hysteria, murder-mystery mechanics, and Gothic atmosphere all get thrown together, with coherence sometimes sacrificed for the next outrageous image.
Despite its place in the genre, this is not primarily an excuse for erotic convent shenanigans. Its strongest interest is in religious horror, bloody spectacle, and the suggestion that holiness can serve as camouflage for something rotten. That makes it feel closer to a supernatural shocker wearing a nun’s habit than an erotic melodrama with horror decorations. The violence interrupts stretches of investigation and ominous conversation with a bluntness that can be genuinely unpleasant. Sometimes those jolts feel earned; sometimes they seem dropped in because the movie has gone too long without doing something appalling. Either way, Mattei rarely lets good taste interfere.
Atmosphere is the film’s biggest asset. The convent feels cramped, shadowy, and emotionally airless, as though nobody has opened a window in decades. Dark corridors and severe religious imagery create an environment where even ordinary movement looks suspicious. At its best, the movie makes the building seem like an extension of its inhabitants’ damaged lives. Every room appears to conceal a secret, and every silence feels enforced rather than peaceful. The priest’s investigation becomes less a straightforward search for evidence than an attempt to navigate a place whose entire identity depends on keeping certain truths inaccessible. That is a stronger source of dread than some of the more obvious supernatural business.
The Goblin music helps considerably, lending the proceedings a sense of menace and grandeur that the filmmaking cannot always sustain on its own. There is something wonderfully excessive about hearing that ominous musical energy attached to such a scrappy production. A hallway suddenly feels more threatening; a strange encounter acquires the weight of an approaching catastrophe. Occasionally the score seems to be doing the heavy lifting, but that is hardly a fatal problem in a movie like this. Its unsettling sound fits a world where everything feels slightly disconnected from ordinary reality, and it gives the film an identity beyond its budgetary limitations.
The performances work best when they lean into the material’s severity rather than trying to make it naturalistic. The Mother Superior is particularly important because she gives the convent’s oppressive atmosphere a human face. Her authority feels defensive and punitive, making the institution itself seem hostile before any demonic explanation is necessary. Elsewhere, stiff dialogue and broad reactions can undercut the tension. These are not richly developed characters so much as people assigned positions within a nightmare: investigator, victim, authority figure, keeper of secrets. Still, their lack of warmth contributes to the sense that this place has drained everyone inside it.
Unfortunately, mood cannot solve every problem. The pacing drags, the investigation becomes repetitive, and the plot occasionally behaves as though connective tissue is an optional luxury. Scenes that should deepen the mystery can instead leave it feeling muddier. The film also wavers between disturbing imagery and outright absurdity without always controlling the transition. For some viewers, those weaknesses will make the experience exhausting. For others, they are part of its grubby appeal. Mattei’s willingness to follow a lurid idea wherever it leads produces both the film’s memorable moments and its least convincing ones. You rarely mistake it for disciplined filmmaking, but you also rarely mistake it for anything respectable.
There is an intriguing resemblance to The Convent of Hell, the graphic erotica novel written by Ricardo Barreiro and illustrated by Ignacio Noé, which appeared roughly two decades later. Its convent setting, infernal intrusion, forbidden spaces, and collision of religious repression with transgression make Mattei’s film seem like a possible precursor. That resemblance should not be confused with documented influence, but the shared territory is striking. Barreiro and Noé take the material much further into explicit erotic grotesquerie, whereas The Other Hell concentrates on supernatural violence and oppressive atmosphere. Both turn the convent’s promise of spiritual shelter inside out, exposing a world where secrecy and authority leave plenty of room for hell.
That’s the question posed to us by Ed Wood’s Plan 9 From Outer Space. The aliens have not only raised the dead and flown their saucers over Hollywood but they’ve also dared to lecture us just because we want to build a bomb that will blow up sunlight. Humanity has responded by trying to stop the zombies and also by trying to blow their flying saucers out of the sky. Those attempts failed.
But then Jeff Trent — a simple, hard-working airline pilot — announces that “that’s all I’m taking” and promptly punches the smug alien in the face. A few seconds later, the flying saucer explodes. Luckily, Jeff and the other humans were able to escape before it did. The aliens were less lucky.
And that’s how you save the world!
Gregory Walcott, who went on to appear in several mainstream productions and became a favorite of Clint Eastwood’s, was reportedly not a huge fan of Plan 9, at least not at first. He only agreed to appear in the film as a favor to his pastor, who was one of the people who helped to finance the film. Walcott probably gives the best performance in the film. When he punches that alien, you feel his frustration.
Later, in 2010, Walcott said, in regards of Plan 9, “It’s better to be remembered for something than nothing.” He even started to attend screenings and meet with fans of the film. I was glad to have learned that. It’s not everyday that you get to save humanity for the dead.
Jeff Trent was a true hero and Gregory Walcott was a hero for bringing him to life.
Today, we pay respect to Edward D. Wood, Jr. on the date of his birth. He was born 102 years ago today.
Some films need no introduction and that’s certainly the case with Wood’s 1957 masterpiece, Plan 9 From Outer Space.
Plan9 is a film like no other, a film that mixes UFOs with zombies and which ends with a rather sincere plea for world peace. When Eros the Alien explains that the Solarnite bomb could destroy the entire universe, the film’s hero, airline pilot Jeff, doesn’t point out that Eros’s logic doesn’t make sense. Instead, he just says that he’s glad that America is the one that has the bomb. “You’re stupid! Stupid minds!” Eros shouts before Jeff flattens him with one punch. Go Jeff! Don’t take any backtalk from that judgmental alien!
From Criswell’s introduction to Tor Johnson’s rise from the dead to Lyle Talbot casually standing with his hands in his pockets while a UFO explodes above him, Plan9 is a true classic of some sort.
Happy Horrorthon! We are in the thick of it! I’ve been really spoiled with talented filmmakers. This film is listed a dark comedy, but I put it closer to horror.
There is a Jazz DJ who has decided to take his life and he calls Lenny. Lenny sets you up with means to take your life that are quite creative and, in exchange, he takes your furniture after your death so he can sell it. I would argue that the furniture business is his real business and the suicidal people are his vendors.
When Lenny meets the Jazz DJ, he discovers that the DJ is really just bored and not facing the typical existential crises that lead one to taking their own life. The film switches to horror because Lenny can tell that the DJ is indifferent to the means of his death; so, he willing to do a “Combo”- multiple death methods at the same time. However, Lenny does not think enough about safety and focuses too much on rigging the death methods, leading to his own quite funny death!
“Last Call Lenny” takes the darkest subject that I can think of and makes it funny. I hope you enjoy it!