Chevy Chase as Indiana Jones?


Was Chevy Chase considered for the role of Indiana Jones in Raiders of the Lost Ark?

According to the internet, he was. While I was doing research into the casting process that led to Harrison Ford being cast as the iconic archaeologist, I came across several trivia sites that claimed that Chase was one of the many actors considered for the role of Indiana Jones. This struck me as being rather odd. Even though Raiders of the Lost Ark was produced at a time when Chase was still a legitimate film star, it was hard to imagine anything about his screen persona that would make producer George Lucas or director Steven Spielberg view him as being a potential Indiana Jones. The idea of Chase as Indiana Jones struck me as being so strange that I started to search for the source of the rumor. I read post after post about the lost roles of Chevy Chase. I clicked on link after link. And what I discovered is that the main source for Chase being considered for Indiana Jones was an anonymous, unsourced piece of trivia on the IMDb. In fact, according to the IMDb, Steve Martin and Bill Murray were also considered for the role.

I’m just going to say it. I don’t buy it. I don’t think any of those people were considered for Indiana Jones. For that matter, I don’t think John Belushi was considered for the role of Dr. Loomis in Halloween, and I also don’t think Chase was seriously considered for the role of Han Solo.

With that in mind, the idea of Chevy Chase playing Han Solo reminded me of just how important Harrison Ford was to the success of the first three Indiana Jones films. Even if Chase wasn’t one of them, a lot of actors not named Harrison Ford were considered for the role of Jones. Jeff Bridges has said that he was considered for the role, but he also denies having ever gotten a firm offer. According to Spielberg, Peter Coyote’s audition for the role led to Spielberg later casting him in E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. Tim Matheson, Nick Mancuso, and John Shea have all been confirmed as having been, at the very least, officially considered. Sam Neill said that he auditioned for the role. Was David Hasselhoff a contender for Indiana Jones? I’ve seen Hasselhoff’s name mentioned on several sites, but it seems that this is another case where the ultimate source is the same anonymous piece of trivia that included Chase, Martin, and Murray as contenders. But the idea of the Hoff as Indiana Jones amuses me to no end, so I’m going to go ahead and say that he actually was considered. Yeah, I’m a hypocrite. So what?

George Lucas has said that he was initially hesitant about casting Harrison Ford because he (1) felt the star should be a relative unknown and (2) didn’t want the critics to say that he wasn’t capable of making a movie without Ford in the cast. Marcia Lucas famously felt that Tom Selleck would have been the perfect Indiana, and George agreed with her. It appeared, at the time, that CBS was going to pass on producing Magnum, P.I., a show for which Selleck had been signed to star. When Lucas and Spielberg asked CBS to release Selleck from his contract so that he could do Raiders, CBS instead put the show into production because Selleck was now “in demand.” With Selleck out of the running, Harrison Ford was finally cast in the role that he was born to play.

I’ve always loved Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones but, to be honest, who doesn’t? What always enchanted me about Ford’s performance is that he wasn’t afraid to be intelligent. No matter what adventures Indiana Jones found himself in, Ford always played him as an academic first and an adventurer second. In the first three films, Indiana seemed just as excited as the audience to see what he would discover in his travels. As for the final two films, they failed because they both tried to bring in a replacement. Audiences didn’t want to see Harrison Ford replaced by Shia LaBeouf. They sure as hell didn’t want to see him being put in his place by Phoebe Waller-Bridge. It doesn’t matter how old he gets or how grouchy he may be. Audiences love Harrison Ford, and they love it when he says that it belongs in a museum.

As for who was considered for the rest of the Raiders ensemble, here are the names that I’ve seen mentioned as having been considered. As always, take these names with a grain of salt.

Marion: Debra Winger was not available. Neither was Spielberg’s girlfriend, Amy Irving. (By most accounts, Irving didn’t think much of any of her future husband’s films.) Sean Young screen-tested with Tom Selleck. Wendie Malick has talked about auditioning for the role while hungover. Jane Seymour, Mary Steenburgen, Michelle Pfeiffer, Stephanie Zimbalist, and Barbara Hershey were reportedly also considered, but the role was offered to Karen Allen.

Brody: Apparently, only Denholm Elliott was considered for Brody, and it is impossible to imagine anyone else in the role.

Sallah: Danny DeVito was actually offered the role, but he was appearing in a television show and couldn’t get out of his contract. John Rhys-Davies was cast instead.

Belloq: Jonathan Pryce, who would have been a great choice, read for the role. Giancarlo Giannini and French singer Jacques Dutronc are frequently mentioned as being other possibilities. The role went to Paul Freeman.

Toht: In his autobiography, Klaus Kinski wrote about turning down the role because it didn’t pay enough. Some sites say that Roman Polanski was offered the role. (If that’s true, one imagines that Spielberg is probably happy in retrospect that Polanski turned him down.) Ronald Lacey was cast in the role, and personally, I think he was perfect for it. As intriguing as the idea of Harrison Ford vs. Klaus Kinski might be, the role of Toht didn’t need a familiar face. It just needed someone who could be menacing.

(Actually, the idea of Chevy Chase vs. Klaus Kinski is even more intriguing! That would have been an interesting set to visit.)

In the end, Raiders of the Lost Ark is one of the few films that one can say is perfectly cast, from Harrison Ford to Karen Allen to John Rhys-Davies and Denholm Elliott. And we’re all the luckier for it!

 

 

Lisa Marie Review A Best Picture Nominee: Raiders of the Lost Ark (dir by Steven Spielberg)


I can hear you right now.

“Really? You’re reviewing Raiders of the Lost Ark for Horrorthon? That’s not a horror movie!”

Well, you’re right, it’s not. That said, it’s definitely a film that borrows from the genre even if it doesn’t embrace it. If you’ve got a thing about spiders, you’ll cringe when Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) has to wipe all of those tarantulas off of that guy’s shirt while they’re exploring the Peruvian temple. If you’ve got a thing about snakes, you’ll share Indiana’s reaction when the cobra hisses at him. And don’t even get me started on the justifiably famous finale. “It’s beautiful!” Belloq (Paul Freeman) shouts right before the angels turn into skeletons. A man’s eyes pop out of his head. Another one melts. Another explodes. There are plenty of scary moments in Raiders of the Lost Ark, but it’s such a thrill ride that the fear doesn’t necessarily linger the way that it would need to for Raiders to actually be considered a horror film. We’re too busy cheering on Indy and Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen) to duck behind the couch. That said, I think Raiders of the Lost Ark is still a perfect film for the Halloween month. Though it was released a little before my time, I imagine that Indiana Jones, with his hat and his bullwhip, was a popular figure when Halloween rolled around in 1981.

I rewatched Raiders of the Lost Ark on Tuesday and, as always, I found myself more than a little amazed at how well it holds up. There’s not a single wasted moment. The action scenes are still exciting. The moments of humor — that poor swordsman! — still make me laugh. There’s not a single weak performance to be found in the film’s large cast. Denholm Elliott is instantly lovable as Prof. Brody and John Rhys-Davies plays Sallah with just the right amount of gusto. Ronald Lacey and Wolf Kahler are thoroughly hissable as the Nazi villains and Paul Freeman brings just enough wit to the role of the duplicitous Belloq that you can understand why he and Indiana were once friends. Of course, the film truly belongs to Karen Allen and Harrison Ford. Karen Allen projects a toughness and an inner strength that keeps Marion from being just another damsel-in-distress. Harrison Ford was the perfect choice for Indiana Jones and he’s equally believable whether he’s running through the jungle, falling into a crypt, or teaching a class. (Indiana is so cute when he puts on his glasses!) My mom always used to say that she liked the way Indiana would smile in a semi-confused way before taking decisive action. For all the arguments about why the last two Indiana Jones movies failed, the answer is pretty simple. They forgot that an Indiana Jones movie is supposed to be about Indiana Jones, not Shia LaBeouf and certainly not some condescending Brit. Harrison Ford is Indiana Jones. He’s the reason we watch.

Raiders of the Lost Ark is a film that is so good that I think there’s a tendency to take it for granted. That’s why, much like with the best of the James Bond films, I think it’s important to rewatch it and re-experience just how good it is. Producer George Lucas and director Steven Spielberg sought to recreate the experience of watching the serials and the adventure films of their youth and they succeeded. Spielberg directs like a man in love with the movies and, as a result, it’s hard not to fall in love with this movie.

Raiders of the Lost Ark was, of course, a huge box office success. It was nominated for several Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director. Harrison Ford was (unforgivably, in my opinion) not nominated for Best Actor. In the end, the Academy selected Warren Beatty over Steven Spielberg and Chariots of Fire over Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Scenes I Love: Peter Weir’s Witness


Today’s scene that I love comes from Peter Weir’s 1985 film, Witness.  In this scene, the Amish come together and raise a barn.  This scene celebrates community and also gives Harrison Ford a chance to show off his real-life carpentry skills.

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special Harrison Ford Edition


4 Or More Shots From 4 Or More Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

Today, the TSL wishes a happy birthday to Harrison Ford.  It’s time for….

4 Shots From 4 Harrison Ford Films

Star Wars: A New Hope (1977, dir by George Lucas)

Apocalypse Now (1979, dir by Francis Ford Coppola)

Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981, dir by Steven Spielberg)

Witness (1985, dir by Peter Weir)

 

 

What Lies Beneath (2000, directed by Robert Zemeckis)


Claire (Michelle Pfeiffer) is a former cellist who is still struggling to recover from a serious car accident and who has been at loose ends ever since her daughter left for college.  Claire’s husband, Norman (Harrison Ford), is a scientist and a college lecturer.  After their neighbor, Mary (Miranda Otto), disappears, Claire becomes convinced that Mary’s husband (James Remar) did something to her.  Claire also becomes convinced that Mary’s ghost is trying to contact her, by appearing in the lake and filling the bathtub up with water whenever Claire isn’t looking.  Norman tells Claire that she’s imagining things and pushes her to see a therapist.  As Claire investigates, she discovers that Norman knows more than he’s letting on.

What Lies Beneath is a long and drawn-out ghost story that Robert Zemeckis made because he had time to kill while the filming of Cast Away was on hiatus so Tom Hanks could lose weight and grow a beard.  That this movie was not a personal project for Zemeckis is reflected in his direction, which is surprisingly impersonal for a Zemeckis film.  The film is a showcase for Michelle Pfeiffer, who gives a good performance as the emotionally fragile Claire and holds the film’s many disparate elements together.  Harrison Ford sometimes seems disinterested but his casting still pays off when Norman gets to say and do some things that you normally would never expect Harrison Ford to do.

I remember seeing this in a theater in 2000 and being surprised by the ending.  Looking back on it today, I just can’t believe that I sat through the entire movie.

Lisa Marie Reviews An Oscar Nominee: Apocalypse Now (dir by Francis Ford Coppola)


1979’s Apocalypse Now reimagines the Vietnam War as pop art.

Jim Morrison sings The End in the background as slow-motion helicopters pass in front of a lush jungle.  The jungle erupts into flame while in a dingy hotel room, Captain Benjamin Willard (Martin Sheen) gets drunks, practices his karate moves, and smashes a mirror before collapsing to the floor in tears.  The next morning, the hung-over and bandaged Willard ends up at a U.S. military base where he has a nice lunch with Lt. General Corman (G.D. Spradlin) and Col. Lucas (Harrison Ford) and a nearly silent man wearing an undone tie.  Willard is asked if it’s true that he assassinated an enemy colonel.  Willard replies that he did not and that the operation was classified, proving that he can both lie and follow military protocol.  Willard is told that a Col. Walter Kurtz (Marlon Brando) has gone rogue and his mission is to go into Cambodia and terminate his command with “extreme” prejudice.  It’s a famous scene that features G.D. Spradlin delivering a brilliant monologue about good and evil and yet it’s often missed that Willard is getting his orders from Roger Corman and George Lucas.

(Roger Corman was the mentor of director Francis Ford Coppola while the pre-Star Wars George Lucas was Coppola’s business partner.  Indeed, Apocalypse Now was originally somewhat improbably planned to be a George Lucas film.)

Up the river, Willard heads on a patrol boat that is populated with characters who could have come out of an old World War II service drama.  Chief (Albert Hall) is tough and no-nonsense.  Lance (Sam Bottoms) is the goofy comic relief who likes to surf.  Clean (Laurence Fishburne) is the kid who is obviously doomed from the minute we first see him.  Chef (Fredric Forrest) is the overage, tightly-wound soldier who just wants to find mangoes in the jungle and who worries that, if he dies in a bad place, his soul won’t be able to find Heaven.  The Rolling Stones are heard on the boat’s radio.  Soldiers on the other patrol boats moon the boat and toss incendiary devices on the roof.  It’s like a frat prank war in the middle of a war.

Colonel Bill Kilgore (Robert Duvall) is a badass calvary officer whose helicopter raids are legendary amongst the enemy and a dedicated surfer who tries to turn every night into the equivalent of an AIP Beach Party film.  He’s a brilliant warrior who speaks with Malibu accent (“Charlie don’t surf!”) and who doesn’t flinch when a bomb goes off near him.  “I love the smell a napalm in the morning,” he says and, for a few moments, you really wish the film would just abandon Willard so we could spend more time with Kilgore.  “Some day this war is going to end,” he says with a reassuring nod, showing a non-neurotic attitude that is the opposite of Kurtz’s.  Willard says that he could tell Kilgore was going to get through the war without even a scratch and it’s true.  Kilgore doesn’t try to rationalize or understand things.  He just accepts the reality and adjusts.  He’s a true surfer.

The film grows progressively more surreal the closer the boat heads up the river and gets closer to Cambodia.  A USO show turns violent as soldiers go crazy at the sight of the Playboy Bunnies, dressed in denim outfits and cowboy hats and twirling cap guns like the love interest in a John Wayne western.  A visit to a bridge that is built every day and blown up every night is a neon-lit, beautiful nightmare.  Who’s the commanding officer?  No one knows and no one cares.

The closer Willard gets to Kurtz, the stranger the world gets.  Fog covers the jungles.  A tiger leaps out of nowhere.  Dennis Hopper shows up as a photojournalist who rambles as if Billy from Easy Rider headed over to Vietnam instead of going to Mardi Gras.  Scott Glenn stands silently in front of a temple, surrounded by dead bodies that feel as if they could have been brought over from an Italian cannibal film.  Kurtz, when he shows up, is an overweight, bald behemoth who talks in riddles and who hardly seem to be the fearsome warrior that he’s been described as being.  “The horror, the horror,” he says at one point in one of the few moments that links Apocalypse Now to its inspiration, Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness.

Directed by near-communist Francis Ford Coppola and written by the unapologetically right-wing John Milius, Apocalypse Now is actually less about the reality of Vietnam and more about how the images of the war shaped pop culture the world over.  It’s a reminder that Vietnam was known for being the first television war and that counterculture was not just made up of dropouts but also of writers, actors, and directors.  Kurtz may say that Willard’s been sent by grocery store clerks but actually, he’s been sent by the B-movie producers who first employed and mentored the directors and the actors who would eventually become the mainstays of the New Hollywood.  The film subverts many classic war film cliches but, at the same time, it stays true to others.  Clean dying while listening to a tape recording of his mother telling him not to get shot and to come home safe is the type of manipulative, heart-tugging moment that could have appeared in any number of World War II-era films.  And while Coppola has always said the film was meant to be anti-war, Col. Kilgore remains the most compelling character.  Most viewers would probably happily ride along with Kilgore while he flies over Vietnam and plays Wagner.  The striking images of Vietnam — the jungle, the explosions, the helicopters flying through the air — stay in the mind far more than the piles of dead bodies that appear in the background.

It’s a big, messy, and ultimately overwhelming film and, while watching it, it’s hard not to get the feeling that Coppola wasn’t totally sure what he was really trying to say.  It’s a glorious mess, full of stunning visuals, haunting music, and perhaps the best performance of Robert Duvall’s legendary career.  The film is too touched with genius to not be watchable but how one reacts overall to the film will probably depend on which version you see.

The original version, which was released in 1979 and was nominated for Best Picture, is relentless with its emphasis on getting up the river and finding Kurtz.  Willard obsesses on Kurtz and really doesn’t have much to do with the other people on the boat.  It gives the story some much-needed narrative momentum but it also makes Kurtz into such a legendary badass that it’s hard not to be disappointed when Willard actually meets him.  You’re left to wonder how, if Kurtz has been living in the jungle and fighting a brutal and never-ending guerilla war against the communists, he’s managed to gain so much weight.  Brando, who reportedly showed up on set unprepared and spent days improvising dialogue, gives a bizarre performance and it’s hard to view the Kurtz we meet as being the Kurtz we’ve heard about.  As strong as the film is, it’s hard not to be let down by who Kurtz ultimately turns out to be.

In 2001 and 2019, Coppola released two more versions of the film, Redux and The Final Cut.  These versions re-inserted a good deal of footage that was edited out of the original cut.  Most of that footage deals with Willard dealing with the crew on the boat and it’s easy to see why it was cut.  The scenes of Willard bonding with the crew feel out of character for both Willard and the rest of the crew.  A scene where Willard arranges for Clean, Lance, and Chef to spend time with the Playboy bunnies seems to go on forever and features some truly unfortunate acting.  Worst of all, Redux totally ruins Kilgore’s “I love the smell of napalm in the morning” monologue by having Willard suddenly steal his surf board.  Again, it’s out of character for Willard and it actually feels a bit disrespectful to Duvall’s performance to suddenly turn Kilgore into a buffoon.

But then there are moments that do work.  I actually like the lengthy French Plantation scene.  By the time Willard, Lance, and Chef stumble into the plantation,  the journey upriver has gotten so surreal that it makes a strange sort of sense that they would run into a large French family arguing politics while a clown tries to keep everyone distracted.  The new versions of the film are undeniably disjointed but they also shift the focus off of finding Kurtz and place it more on Willard discovering how weird things are getting in Vietnam.  As such, it’s less of a disappointment when Kurtz actually shows up.  Much as with the French Plantation scene, the journey has become so weird that Kurtz being overweight and pretentious feels somehow appropriate.

What all the versions of the film have in common is that they’re all essentially a neon-lit dream of pop cultural horror.  Is Apocalypse Now a horror film?  Critic Kim Newman argued that it owed a lot to the genre.  Certainly, that’s the case when Willard reaches the temple and finds himself surrounded by corpses and and detached heads.  Even before that, though, there are elements of horror.  The enemy is always unseen in the jungle and, when they attack, they do so quickly and without mercy.  In a scene that could almost have come from a Herzog film, the boat is attacked with toy arrows until suddenly, out of nowhere, someone throws a very real spear.  Until he’s revealed, Kurtz is a ghostly figure and Willard is the witch hunter, sent to root him out of his lair and set his followers on fire.  If the post-60s American horror genre was shaped by the images coming out of Vietnam then Apocalypse Now definitely deserves to be considered, at the very least, horror-adjacent.

Apocalypse Now was controversial when it was released.  (It’s troubled production had been the talk of Hollywood for years before Coppola finally finished his film.)  It was nominated for Best Picture but lost to the far more conventional Kramer vs Kramer.  Robert Duvall was the film’s sole acting nominee but he lost the award to Melvyn Douglas’s turn in Being There.  Douglas was very good in Being There and I imagine giving him the Oscar was also seen as a way of honoring his entire career.  That said, Duvall’s performance was amazing.  In his relatively brief screen time, Duvall somehow managed to take over and ground one of the most unruly films ever made.  The Oscar definitely should have gone to him.

As for the film itself, all three versions, flaws and all, are classics.  It’s a film that proves that genius can be found in even the messiest of productions.

Scenes I Love: The Barn Raising Scene From Peter Weir’s Witness


Today’s scene that I love comes from Peter Weir’s 1985 film, Witness.  In this scene, the Amish come together and raise a barn.  This scene celebrates community and also gives Harrison Ford a chance to show off his real-life carpentry skills.

Song of the Day: Raiders March by John Williams


Since today is the birthday of Harrison Ford, it seems only appropriate that today’s song of the day should come from John Williams’s score of one of Ford’s best films, Raiders of the Lost Ark!

Here is Raiders March, composed by John Williams.

Brad’s “Scene of the Day” – Harrison Ford changes in REGARDING HENRY (1991)!


Happy 83rd birthday to the legendary Harrison Ford!

Ford has had so many iconic roles, from Han Solo and Indiana Jones, to Dr. Richard Kimble and Jack Ryan, but one of my favorites has always been Henry Turner. There’s something about Henry that really resonates with me, and I think it’s the hope that people can change from selfish A-holes to caring people who love their wives, are good dads, and who will stand up for what’s right. Enjoy the scene below of Henry trying to make amends for being a slimy, scum-sucking lawyer in REGARDING HENRY!

(On a side note, I always enjoyed playing wrestling with my Star Wars figurines when I was in grade school. Han Solo was always one of the toughest guys to beat!!)

Presumed Innocent (1990, directed by Alan J. Pakula)


Harrison Ford stars as Rusty Sabich, a smart and ambitious prosecutor who is accused of murdering his former mistress, Carolyn Polhemus (Greta Scacchi).

A lot of people were taken by surprise when Presumed Innocent first came out in 1990.  After a career of always being the hero and the type of person who took his fate into his own hands, Presumed Innocent featured a passive Harrison Ford whose fate was in the hands of his lawyer, Sandy Stern (Raul Julia) and in the prosecutors who are trying to send him to prison.  For most of the movie, the audience doesn’t know if Rusty is innocent and a lot of what Rusty does makes him seem to be guilty.  Just the fact that Harrison Ford was playing someone who would cheat on his wife (played by Bonnie Bedelia, who everyone had last seen sticking up for Bruce Willis in Die Hard) was considered to be shocking at the time.  It says a lot about Ford’s appeal as an actor that he remains sympathetic even though he’s playing a character who does a lot of bad things.  He remains compelling, even though Rusty is forced to spend a good deal of the movie as a passive spectator.  To anyone who underrates Harrison Ford an actor, this is the film to show them.

Presumed Innocent is a murder mystery but it’s also a sad-eyed look at a corrupt judicial system.  Rusty is accused of murder largely due to the whims of fate.  If Raymond Horgan (Brian Dennehy), Rusty’s former patron, had been reelected as district attorney, Rusty would never have been charged.  When the trial moves to the courtroom, the Judge (Paul Winfield) himself is revealed to have been compromised by his own relationship with Carolyn, something that Sandy is willing to use to the defense’s advantage.  John Spencer plays a detective who is willing to hide evidence to protect Rusty.  Joe Grifasi plays a former detective who is motivated less by the evidence in the case and more by a personal grudge against Rusty.  The idea of getting justice for Carolyn is pushed to the side by everyone’s personal drama.  The ending challenges all of our preconceived notions about Rusty and the meaning of guilt and innocence.

Intelligently directed by Alan J. Pakula and featuring an excellent cast, Presumed Innocent is a top-notch legal thriller and also one of Harrison Ford’s best films.