Brad reviews DEATH WEEKEND (1976)!


With October being a fun month for horror, I’ve been searching for some scary movies that I’ve never seen before. As I was browsing the horror genre on Tubi the other day, I came across this little Canadian movie called DEATH WEEKEND. Also known as “The House by the Lake,” I noticed it has a simple story, a solid cast and a short running time. I decided to give it a shot. 

The movie opens with a playboy dentist named Harry (Chuck Shamata from DEATH WISH 5) and his fashion model girlfriend Diane (Brenda Vaccaro) driving out to his countryside home for a weekend getaway. While on the way, they cross paths with a group of crazy, drunk guys in a fast car, led by Lep (Don Stroud), and end up engaging in a dangerous game of road rage. They’re finally able to give them the slip, but they’ve made some enemies who are determined to find them and get even. When they track the couple to the home, the weekend is now set for death!

I have to admit I was very uncomfortable with this one from the very beginning. The guys are truly awful. Lep and the drunken thugs terrorize the couple on the road for no other reason than they can. And when the couple gets away, with a woman behind the wheel, no less, they use this as an excuse to track them to the home, and this is where things get really disturbing. They are cruel, vicious people, and the movie doesn’t give us any more information about them. They just seem to enjoy rape and murder. This nihilistic behavior seemed to go on and on and was hard for me to watch. 

There’s no hope for Harry, either. He had lied to Diane about the entire weekend. They were supposed to be there with other couples, but Harry had set the whole thing up for them to be alone just so he could get laid. What a jerk! And when the thugs take over, he’s a perfect coward much more worried about his safety and his property than he is about Diane. I can understand being scared and wanting to survive, but he’s revealed as a completely selfish person and about as unlikable as it gets. 

The only person who has a shred of humanity in this film is Diane. Of course, this being a 70’s movie, she’s terrorized, abused, and raped. I know I may be coming off as a hypocrite, because I love Charles Bronson and his DEATH WISH franchise notoriously features brutal scenes of rape. Well, those scenes are sickening to me, and I don’t like to watch them. And I didn’t like watching this one either. This movie seemed to revel in cruelty for the sake of cruelty and nothing else. I won’t say that I didn’t enjoy it when she finally gets a chance to get some revenge, but I wish the movie had given us more time to enjoy it. After everything she goes through, I wanted a little more satisfaction out of seeing her fight back. I will give the movie props for one impressive throat slash death, though. 

I did think that the actors were fine in their various roles. Don Stroud was effectively crazy as the lead murderer / rapist, Chuck Shamata made me really dislike his lecherous liar, and you can’t help but pull for Brenda Vaccaro after what she goes through. But at the end of the day, I can’t say that I enjoyed the movie that surrounded them very much. This movie presented relentless cruelty for most of its run time before finally giving Diane a few minutes to try to get some payback. Not only did the movie make me uncomfortable, it also left me feeling unsatisfied. 

We Watched Twilight (2007, Dir. by Catherine Hardwicke)


Oh, Twilight! How we missed you, with your blue-tinted view of the world and your romantic bloodsuckers!

After her mother remarries a minor-league baseball player, 17-year-old Bella (Kristen Stewart) moves from sunny Arizona to gray, wet Washington State. She lives with her father, the police chief (Billy Burke), and starts at a new school. Her friend is played by Anna Kendrick! How cool is that? She has a crush on Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson), and Edward has a crush on her, but Edward’s also a vampire, and he’s been seventeen since the Spanish flu epidemic. Bella discovers that she loves Edward, Edward loves Bella, and Edward’s family loves Bella, but there’s a group of vampires who want to feast on Bella. Also, Bella’s friend Jacob (Taylor Lautner) doesn’t like Edward, but we won’t find out the full details about all that until the next movie!

Lisa and I watched Twilight on Netflix earlier today, and yeah, it’s bad, but it’s just so addictive that you can’t look away. Even today, it’s hard to know whether to laugh or swoon. I usually end up doing both because the longing and smoldering way that Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson look at each other makes up for the fact that it’s a long movie where not much really happens. I was so excited waiting for the baseball scene, but I had forgotten how long it takes before Edward’s adopted family plays vampire baseball in the middle of a storm. Sign them all up for the Rangers, I don’t care if they glow. A sensitive ball player? Go ahead and bite my neck! Edward might seem mopey but when Bella needs to be protected from the other vampires, he and his father (Peter Facinelli) are right there and showing they know what to do. He’s a fighter, that Edward Cullen! And he’s a dream of a prom date too.

Twilight is what it is, and everyone who makes fun of it has a point, but I don’t care. I’ll be watching the second movie tomorrow.

Lifetime In October: Killer Prom (dir by Alexandre Carriere)


In 2020’s Killer Prom, Yvonne Zima plays Sienna. Poor Sienna is desperately struggling with her life. She has a cheap apartment that she still can’t really afford. Her mother wants nothing to do with her. She hasn’t had much of a romantic life since missing her high school prom. She’s very jealous of her distant cousin, Hannah (Megan Vincent). Hannah is married to Dr. Tony Wilson (Mark Lutz), a man on whom Sienna has always had a crush. So, Sienna drowns Hannah at the family reunion and then moves to Texas so she can be close to Tony and his family.

Sienna not only wants to marry Tony. She also wants to help Tony’s teenage daughter, Maya (Erica Anderson), have a great prom night! In fact, Sienna has it all perfectly planned out. While Maya is off at prom, Tony will be so moved by his love for Sienna that he’ll ask her to marry him. The only problem is that Maya instantly notices that something is off about Sienna and she really doesn’t want her anywhere near her prom or her date, Jake (Kyle Meagher). Meanwhile, Tony is too busy mourning his wife to fall in love with anyone. And even if Tony was going to fall in love with anyone, it would probably be his assistant, Lauren (Brianna Barnes).

Oh, Sienna hates Lauren. When Lauren shows up at a barbecue, Sienna has to duck into the bathroom so she can ask her reflection, “Who wears a red dress to a barbecue!?” Really, Sienna? Who wears a red dress to a barbecue? I WEAR A RED DRESS TO A BARBECUE! You have a problem with me!? That said, Lauren’s dress is a little bit too expensive for a barbecue. Barbecues can get messy as anyone who has seen that picture of James Talarico sinking his teeth into those ribs can tell you.

Anyway, it’s a Lifetime film so Sienna loses it. She goes from wanting to marry Tony and become Maya’s stepmother to wanting to kill them both and does it pretty quickly. Of course, it’s up to Maya to save the family, even if that means missing her own prom. Don’t count on Tony to do anything. Tony is bizarrely clueless, even though it’s pretty much obvious from the start that Sienna has some issues. Men in Lifetime films never stop to think that the attractive woman who was the last person to see their wife before her mysterious death could possibly be a troublemaker.

I really enjoyed Killer Prom, mostly because I went to prom every year that I was in high school and I had a blast each time. Movies like this pretty much live and die based on how effective the actress playing the psycho is and Yvonne Zima gives a wonderfully unhinged performance as Sienna. She’s just so incredibly excited about the prom! It’s hard not to feel bad for her when it becomes clear that she’s going to end up missing another one.

4 Films For The Weekend (10/10/26)


I’ve been watching Mike Flanagan’s Carrie on Prime.  I finished the fourth episode last night and today, I’m trying to find the strength to subject myself to rest of it.  To say that I’m not a fan of the changes that Flanagan made to the story would be understatement.  In my opinion, it really does reflect the worst tendencies of what is known as elevated horror.

Fortunately, you can currently stream Brian De Palma’s Carrie (1976) and, if you haven’t seen it, you really do have an obligation to do so.  Flanagan needs 8 hours to tell his story.  De Palma only needed 98 minutes and a cast that could actually deliver their lines in something that wasn’t a robotic drone.  The film works because De Palma never feels the need to apologize for  making a horror film.  It also works because it actually has a nicely macabre sense of humor, something that’s lacking in both King’s novel and Flanagan’s work in general.  The film is currently on Prime.

The Rage: Carrie 2 (1999) doesn’t get much respect from a lot of horror fans but I’ve always liked it.  Interestingly, The Rage actually covers some of the same thematic ground as Flanagan’s adaptation.  The difference is that, once again, it only needs 105 minutes to make its point and it doesn’t apologize for being a horror film.  The scene where the football players go crazy while getting their heads shaved (and, in the process, become indistinguishable from one another) is surprisingly disturbing.  The finale, where Rachel goes on a rampage, is effectively violent and horrific, even if it can’t match the power of De Palma’s prom.  I was scared to wear my reading glasses after watching this movie.  Emily Bergl gives a good performance as Rachel.  Jason London sells the film’s final scene.  The oldest son from Home Improvement loses his testicles in closeup.  Be careful with those spearguns!  The film is on Prime.

Evilspeak (1981)  is the film that asks, “What if Carrie was a guy and what if he was a student at a military academy and what if he got his powers from a personal computer and what if he was played by Clint Howard?”  That’s a lot of questions but, for the most part, the answers are all entertaining in their own demented way.  Evilspeak is interesting because Stanley Coopersmith (played by the great Clint Howard) is not particularly sympathetic but his tormentors are so much worse that you still feel Stanley deserved his revenge and you don’t mind when the cannibal pigs show up.  This is also an example of one of my favorite mini-genres, the killer computer film.  I guess that people in the early 80s though you could do anything with a computer, even summon the denizens of the damned.  The film is on Prime.

The Fury (1979) was De Palma’s follow-up to Carrie and I have to admit that I’m not a huge fan of this film.  That said, I know that the film does have its fans.  The fact that I’m listing it here shows just how much I’m currently disliking Flanagan’s Carrie.  I’d even rather rewatch The Fury then suffer another minute of the new Carrie!  That said, The Fury is occasionally interesting.  De Palma mashes up a lot of genres.  Kirk Douglas grimaces as if the world depended upon it.  Amy Irving takes the film a bit too seriously, as if she expected to follow in the footsteps of Sissy Spacek and receive an Oscar nomination for playing a telekinetic teen.  Carrie Snodgress is annoying but then her character dies in slow motion.  Never let “Here comes The Pony Express!” by your final words.  John Cassavetes later said he did the film for the money.  Bless him.  The film is on Prime.

Horror Film Review: The Other Hell (dir. by Bruno Mattei)


“The genitals are the door to evil!” — Mother Vincenza

The convent in Bruno Mattei’s The Other Hell feels less like a refuge from the world than a place where all its worst impulses have been locked inside. This ragged slice of Italian horror turns a religious sanctuary into a pressure cooker of Catholic guilt, supernatural menace, and institutional cruelty. It is messy, frequently ridiculous, and occasionally more confusing than frightening, but there is something appealing about its complete lack of restraint. Mattei throws so much sinister religious imagery at the screen that even the quieter scenes feel contaminated. This is not elegant Gothic horror. It is nunsploitation with dirty fingernails, steeped in the lurid sensibility of the Italian horror scene of the late ’70s and early ’80s.

The story centers on an isolated convent where disturbing incidents and violent deaths suggest that something evil has taken up residence. A priest arrives to investigate, but getting answers proves difficult when the Mother Superior treats every question like an attack on her authority. The convent’s inhabitants seem caught between fear, obedience, and knowledge they would rather keep buried. That gives the film a decent mystery beneath all the supernatural theatrics. Is the danger coming from an outside force, or has it grown out of the cruelty already hiding behind these walls? Mattei is not particularly careful about developing that question, but it gives the surrounding madness something to hang onto.

As a prime example of nunsploitation, The Other Hell understands the appeal of turning a supposedly sacred environment into a breeding ground for corruption. Religious devotion and institutional repression become difficult to separate, while images normally associated with comfort acquire an ugly edge. Habits, crucifixes, candles, and chapel interiors stop suggesting refuge and start looking like accessories in a nightmare. The film belongs comfortably to that late-’70s and early-’80s Italian exploitation tradition of borrowing familiar horror ingredients and making them nastier. Possession-movie hysteria, murder-mystery mechanics, and Gothic atmosphere all get thrown together, with coherence sometimes sacrificed for the next outrageous image.

Despite its place in the genre, this is not primarily an excuse for erotic convent shenanigans. Its strongest interest is in religious horror, bloody spectacle, and the suggestion that holiness can serve as camouflage for something rotten. That makes it feel closer to a supernatural shocker wearing a nun’s habit than an erotic melodrama with horror decorations. The violence interrupts stretches of investigation and ominous conversation with a bluntness that can be genuinely unpleasant. Sometimes those jolts feel earned; sometimes they seem dropped in because the movie has gone too long without doing something appalling. Either way, Mattei rarely lets good taste interfere.

Atmosphere is the film’s biggest asset. The convent feels cramped, shadowy, and emotionally airless, as though nobody has opened a window in decades. Dark corridors and severe religious imagery create an environment where even ordinary movement looks suspicious. At its best, the movie makes the building seem like an extension of its inhabitants’ damaged lives. Every room appears to conceal a secret, and every silence feels enforced rather than peaceful. The priest’s investigation becomes less a straightforward search for evidence than an attempt to navigate a place whose entire identity depends on keeping certain truths inaccessible. That is a stronger source of dread than some of the more obvious supernatural business.

The Goblin music helps considerably, lending the proceedings a sense of menace and grandeur that the filmmaking cannot always sustain on its own. There is something wonderfully excessive about hearing that ominous musical energy attached to such a scrappy production. A hallway suddenly feels more threatening; a strange encounter acquires the weight of an approaching catastrophe. Occasionally the score seems to be doing the heavy lifting, but that is hardly a fatal problem in a movie like this. Its unsettling sound fits a world where everything feels slightly disconnected from ordinary reality, and it gives the film an identity beyond its budgetary limitations.

The performances work best when they lean into the material’s severity rather than trying to make it naturalistic. The Mother Superior is particularly important because she gives the convent’s oppressive atmosphere a human face. Her authority feels defensive and punitive, making the institution itself seem hostile before any demonic explanation is necessary. Elsewhere, stiff dialogue and broad reactions can undercut the tension. These are not richly developed characters so much as people assigned positions within a nightmare: investigator, victim, authority figure, keeper of secrets. Still, their lack of warmth contributes to the sense that this place has drained everyone inside it.

Unfortunately, mood cannot solve every problem. The pacing drags, the investigation becomes repetitive, and the plot occasionally behaves as though connective tissue is an optional luxury. Scenes that should deepen the mystery can instead leave it feeling muddier. The film also wavers between disturbing imagery and outright absurdity without always controlling the transition. For some viewers, those weaknesses will make the experience exhausting. For others, they are part of its grubby appeal. Mattei’s willingness to follow a lurid idea wherever it leads produces both the film’s memorable moments and its least convincing ones. You rarely mistake it for disciplined filmmaking, but you also rarely mistake it for anything respectable.

There is an intriguing resemblance to The Convent of Hell, the graphic erotica novel written by Ricardo Barreiro and illustrated by Ignacio Noé, which appeared roughly two decades later. Its convent setting, infernal intrusion, forbidden spaces, and collision of religious repression with transgression make Mattei’s film seem like a possible precursor. That resemblance should not be confused with documented influence, but the shared territory is striking. Barreiro and Noé take the material much further into explicit erotic grotesquerie, whereas The Other Hell concentrates on supernatural violence and oppressive atmosphere. Both turn the convent’s promise of spiritual shelter inside out, exposing a world where secrecy and authority leave plenty of room for hell.

Hero of the Day: Jeff Trent (Plan 9 From Outer Space)


How do you stop an alien invasion?

That’s the question posed to us by Ed Wood’s Plan 9 From Outer Space.  The aliens have not only raised the dead and flown their saucers over Hollywood but they’ve also dared to lecture us just because we want to build a bomb that will blow up sunlight.  Humanity has responded by trying to stop the zombies and also by trying to blow their flying saucers out of the sky.  Those attempts failed.

But then Jeff Trent — a simple, hard-working airline pilot — announces that “that’s all I’m taking” and promptly punches the smug alien in the face.  A few seconds later, the flying saucer explodes.  Luckily, Jeff and the other humans were able to escape before it did.  The aliens were less lucky.

And that’s how you save the world!

Gregory Walcott, who went on to appear in several mainstream productions and became a favorite of Clint Eastwood’s, was reportedly not a huge fan of Plan 9, at least not at first.  He only agreed to appear in the film as a favor to his pastor, who was one of the people who helped to finance the film.  Walcott probably gives the best performance in the film.  When he punches that alien, you feel his frustration.

Later, in 2010, Walcott said, in regards of Plan 9, “It’s better to be remembered for something than nothing.”  He even started to attend screenings and meet with fans of the film.  I was glad to have learned that.  It’s not everyday that you get to save humanity for the dead.

Jeff Trent was a true hero and Gregory Walcott was a hero for bringing him to life.

Hero of the Day

Horror On The Lens: Plan 9 From Outer Space (dir by Edward D. Wood, Jr.)


 

Today, we pay respect to Edward D. Wood, Jr. on the date of his birth.  He was born 102 years ago today.

Some films need no introduction and that’s certainly the case with Wood’s 1957 masterpiece, Plan 9 From Outer Space.

Plan 9 is a film like no other, a film that mixes UFOs with zombies and which ends with a rather sincere plea for world peace.  When Eros the Alien explains that the Solarnite bomb could destroy the entire universe, the film’s hero, airline pilot Jeff, doesn’t point out that Eros’s logic doesn’t make sense.  Instead, he just says that he’s glad that America is the one that has the bomb.  “You’re stupid!  Stupid minds!” Eros shouts before Jeff flattens him with one punch.  Go Jeff!  Don’t take any backtalk from that judgmental alien!

From Criswell’s introduction to Tor Johnson’s rise from the dead to Lyle Talbot casually standing with his hands in his pockets while a UFO explodes above him, Plan 9 is a true classic of some sort.

Can you prove it didn’t happen?

“Last Call Lenny” (Dir. Julien Lasseur) Short Film Review by Case Wright


Happy Horrorthon! We are in the thick of it! I’ve been really spoiled with talented filmmakers. This film is listed a dark comedy, but I put it closer to horror.

There is a Jazz DJ who has decided to take his life and he calls Lenny. Lenny sets you up with means to take your life that are quite creative and, in exchange, he takes your furniture after your death so he can sell it. I would argue that the furniture business is his real business and the suicidal people are his vendors.

When Lenny meets the Jazz DJ, he discovers that the DJ is really just bored and not facing the typical existential crises that lead one to taking their own life. The film switches to horror because Lenny can tell that the DJ is indifferent to the means of his death; so, he willing to do a “Combo”- multiple death methods at the same time. However, Lenny does not think enough about safety and focuses too much on rigging the death methods, leading to his own quite funny death!

“Last Call Lenny” takes the darkest subject that I can think of and makes it funny. I hope you enjoy it!

The Unnominated #22: The Warriors (dir by Walter Hill)


Though the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences claim that the Oscars honor the best of the year, we all know that there are always worthy films and performances that end up getting overlooked.  Sometimes, it’s because the competition too fierce.  Sometimes, it’s because the film itself was too controversial.  Often, it’s just a case of a film’s quality not being fully recognized until years after its initial released.  This series of reviews takes a look at the films and performances that should have been nominated but were, for whatever reason, overlooked.  These are the Unnominated.

Why am I talking about 1979’s The Warriors in October?

No, it’s not a traditional horror movie, even though the film does have some creepy moments and it features David Patrick Kelly playing one of the most memorable psychos in film history. At heart, it’s a film about a group of youngish gang members trying to survive the night and reach safety. (The characters are all meant to be teenagers, though that can be hard to remember when two of the film’s main characters are played by Michael Beck and James Remar, both of whom were close to 30 when the film was made.) The other gangs that the Warriors mostly either battle or escape from often feel as if they’ve stepped out of a nightmare. Everyone remembers the Baseball Furies because, as a gang, they were both intimidating and ludicrous at the same time. Myself, I was freaked out by the skinheads who drove around New York in a bus. The gang led by the guy on roller skates was pretty frightening as well. One thing about the rival gang members is that, with the exception of Luther, few of them speak. Instead, they simply show up and attack.

The Warriors (1979, directed by Walter Hill, DP: Andrew Laszlo)

The Warriors is a surreal film, which is not surprising when you consider that it was written by Walter Hill. The film takes place almost entirely at night and the streets of New York are eerily empty. Watching the film, I was reminded of the dying Paris from Jean Rollin’s Night of the Hunted and Dario Argento’s claim that Tenebrae was meant to take place in a future where there were far fewer people on the planet. At the same time, there are hints of the real world littered throughout the film. Four teenagers who are obviously heading home from prom find themselves on a train, sitting across from a bruised Swan (Michael Beck) and Mercy (Deborah Van Valkenburgh). Occasionally, we see people in bars or just trying to get back to their own homes. The subway stations are crawling with cops, one of whom throws Fox (Thomas G. Waites) in front of a moving train. Throughout the film, the members of the Warriors keep count of who is still with them on their journey to Coney Island, but no one mentions Fox after his sudden death. One could argue that they don’t want to think about how easily things could go wrong for them. They’re in a fantasy world where there are no consequences. Of course, a more likely reason is because Fox’s death was a last-minute development that was a result of actor Waites proving to be difficult to work with.

The Warriors (1979, dir by Walter Hill, DP: Andrew Laszlo)

Ultimately, The Warriors is a film for Halloween because it’s a film about costumes. The members of each gang are defined by what they wear. Some of them dress up. Some of them dress like they’re doing some sort of Bruce Springsteen-style working-class cosplay. There’s even a group of mimes who wear top hats. I feel bad for any neighborhood that is weak enough to be taken over by mimes. The film’s first great set piece—the meeting in the park—is rightly remembered for Roger Hill’s charismatic performance as Cyrus. (“Can you dig it!?”) But it also deserves to be remembered for the hundreds of extras, all of whom are wearing their costumes and mixing together. That’s the respect that Cyrus commands. The mimes and the pimps and the skinheads and the roller skaters are all willing to come together for Cyrus. And when Luther assassinates Cyrus and then blames the Warriors, the gangs of the city are prepared to destroy the gang of Coney Island.

The Warriors (1979, dir by Walter Hill, DP: Andrew Laszlo)

It’s a great and exciting film that has stood the test of time. It’s not a surprise that it wasn’t Oscar-nominated. The film was controversial when it was released, with some claiming that it glorified gang life and that it promoted violence. Beyond that, the film is unapologetically pulpy. Walter Hill was and is a brilliant genre filmmaker and he’s never apologized for that fact. His films were never obvious award bait. That said, it does seem a shame that The Warriors didn’t even get a nomination for its propulsive score. The film’s cinematography turned a familiar city into an alien landscape and the editing kept viewers on the edge of their seats. It’s rare to see a film that captures the feeling of the world closing in on a group of people as well as The Warriors does. As far as the acting goes, the majority of the cast was inexperienced and there were more than a few times when that inexperience came through. It’s a film that’s more about visual style than deep performances. That said, Michael Beck was likable and had the right look to be a leader and Hill was very smart in how he framed him on screen. James Remar also did a good job as Ajax, playing him as being strong-willed and obnoxious and a bit too obsessed with proving his masculinity but also fiercely loyal to his gang. (As played by Remar, Ajax was the only Warrior who truly seemed like he could handle himself in a fight.) Deborah Van Valkenburgh was effective in an underwritten role. If anyone from the cast deserved a nomination, it was probably David Patrick Kelly. “Warriors, come out to play!” Kelly was a force of pure chaos. In the end, the big Oscar winner of 1979 was Kramer vs. Kramer, a film that might as well have taken place on a different planet from The Warriors.

If I may close on a personal note, I was feeling pretty sick last Thursday. I hadn’t gotten much sleep. I was stressed about getting my Horrorthon reviews written. I had given myself a headache. But then, I watched The Warriors and I got so sucked into its world (despite the fact that I had already watched the film more than a few times) that I forgot that I wasn’t feeling well. My headache went away. By the time the film ended, I was feeling a hundred times better.

Nominated or not, that’s the power of a good movie.

The Warriors (1979, dir by Walter Hill, DP: Andrew Laszlo)

Previous Entries In The Unnominated:

  1. Auto Focus 
  2. Star 80
  3. Monty Python and The Holy Grail
  4. Johnny Got His Gun
  5. Saint Jack
  6. Office Space
  7. Play Misty For Me
  8. The Long Riders
  9. Mean Streets
  10. The Long Goodbye
  11. The General
  12. Tombstone
  13. Heat
  14. Kansas City Bomber
  15. Touch of Evil
  16. The Mortal Storm
  17. Honky Tonk Man
  18. Two-Lane Blacktop
  19. The Terminator
  20. The Ninth Configuration
  21. Southern Comfort

October Postivity: Stan The Man (dir by Kendall Bryant, Jr.)


In 2025’s Stan The Man, Angus Benfield stars as Stan Jacobs, a football coach looking for redemption.

When we first meet Stan, he’s one of the most popular men in Texas.  He’s a pro football coach, one who has been leading his team to victory after victory.  One commentator states that Stan has put Texas “on the map.”  He’s known as “Stan the Men” and everyone wants his autograph.  What the public doesn’t know is that Stan is an alcoholic.  After coaching while drunk (and even worse, losing the game), Stan is suspended from coaching.  Because he can’t control his drinking, he soon finds himself in prison and then living on the streets.  Eventually, Stan finds God, stop drinking, and gets the opportunity to coach a high school team.  By an amazing coincidence, his star player just happens to have an alcoholic father who could use some counseling from someone who has been there….

It’s a nice storty and a well-intentioned film.  That said, I am begging the directors of these low-budget, faith-based films to study how to tell a story and how to maintain narrative momentum.  Stan The Man takes over a 100 minutes to tell an 80-minute story.  Indeed, Stan isn’t even offered the high school coaching job until about 40 minutes into the movie.  Before that, we have to sit through a lot of scenes that basically tell us the exact same thing over and over again: Stan is an alcoholic.  Most of what happened during the first half of this film could have easily been compressed to just a handful of minutes.  As it is, the movie just plays out too slowly.

And that’s a shame because there were some things that I definitely appreciated about this film.  The film was set and shot in Texas and the scenery was lovely.  Angus Benfield gave a good performance as Stan and most of the members of the supporting cast were believable in their roles.  The film’s intentions were definitely good and I appreciated the emphasis that was put on forgiveness and second chances.  Even at his worst and his most obnoxious, Stan is still clearly someone who, deep down, wants to change and fix his life.  The film did not sugarcoat just how difficult it can be to grow up in the shadow of alcoholism.  At the end of the film, I have to admit that I genuinely smiled when one of the characters introduced himself by sayin that he was a week sober.  It was a genuinely sweet moment and, when he said those words, I remembered when my Dad was a week sober.  And then a month sober.  And then a year sober.  And then several years sober.  In that moment, the film definitely got to me.

If only the film wasn’t so slow.  I think that directors sometimes think that good intentions are enough.  But I would ask anyone who is making a movie to watch and truly study other films before they ever say, “Action!” for the first time.  Stan The Man reaches a decent conclusion but it takes forever for it to really get started.