Film Review: The Dog Stars (dir. by Ridley Scott)


“This world fits you, Bangley. Wake up, defend, survive.” — Hig

Ridley Scott’s The Dog Stars has the scenery of an epic and the energy of someone still deciding whether to get out of bed. There is something potentially compelling about that mismatch: the world has ended, the survivors are exhausted, and being alive no longer means having much to live for. But Scott leans so heavily into melancholy that the film gradually becomes underwhelming. Even when violence interrupts the quiet, it rarely shakes the movie out of its mournful drift. What should feel like a journey through a frightening new world often plays more like a post-apocalyptic travelog, with beautiful views and occasional armed interruptions.

Adapted by screenwriter Mark L. Smith from Peter Heller’s 2012 novel The Dog Stars, the film follows Hig, played by Jacob Elordi, a pilot and mechanic living in Colorado after a pandemic has wiped out most of humanity. His wife is gone, and his remaining companions are his dog, Jasper, and Bangley, a heavily armed former military man played by Josh Brolin. Together, they occupy an abandoned airfield, where practical survival has replaced anything resembling a normal life. Hig eventually follows the possibility of a radio transmission toward other survivors, hoping there might be something beyond the routine of scavenging and keeping strangers at gunpoint.

That setup gives the film a useful emotional conflict. Bangley considers their arrangement a success because they have food, shelter, weapons, and a defensible position. Hig sees the same situation as a slower version of dying. Brolin’s hardened survivor and Elordi’s wounded optimist represent two different responses to catastrophe: shut everyone out, or risk getting hurt by reaching for someone. The problem is that the movie makes this contrast clear fairly early and then struggles to deepen it. Hig’s dissatisfaction supplies a reason to leave, but Scott’s languid treatment makes the journey feel less urgent than the decision behind it ought to be.

Elordi fits the film’s mood, giving Hig the presence of someone carrying grief through every ordinary task. His youth also makes the character’s emotional exhaustion potentially affecting: this is a man who should have decades ahead of him but cannot imagine what those years would contain. Still, the movie relies too much on the appeal of a handsome, sorrowful figure moving through picturesque emptiness. There is a difference between showing a character who feels hollow and allowing that hollowness to become the film’s dominant dramatic quality. Too often, Hig’s sadness is the atmosphere rather than something the story meaningfully tests.

Visually, Scott certainly understands the attraction of a world that has started growing over humanity’s leftovers. The landscapes are expansive, and the production uses Italian locations to stand in for Colorado, with the Dolomites taking the place of the Rockies. Yet the beauty creates its own problem. The more inviting the countryside becomes, the harder the film has to work to make its underlying danger feel immediate. Scott keeps reaching for the scale of an epic, but scale alone cannot make a succession of lonely vistas emotionally expansive. Sometimes the apocalypse looks less like a catastrophe than an unusually exclusive outdoor getaway.

There is also the unavoidable resemblance to HBO’s The Last of Us. The overgrowth, decaying infrastructure, wary survivors, and uneasy movement through abandoned spaces belong to a familiar visual vocabulary by now. The Dog Stars seems eager to exploit the appeal of that look without finding enough fresh perspective to make it distinctive. That is an aesthetic criticism, not a claim that Scott literally copied the series; Heller’s novel has its own history. But the film arrives in a crowded genre, and its lush decay too often prompts recognition rather than discovery. You know the scenery, and you can usually guess the emotional weather.

The violence should complicate that prettiness, and occasionally it does. Raiders and hostile survivors puncture Hig’s wandering with reminders that an empty world is not necessarily a peaceful one. But these bursts of brutality often feel like interruptions rather than pressure building naturally inside the story. Scott alternates reflective stretches with sudden threats, yet the two modes do not consistently strengthen each other. The action briefly wakes the movie up, then the prevailing sadness settles back into place. Instead of making the quieter passages more tense, the attacks can feel like scheduled reminders that this is still supposed to be a dangerous survival thriller.

The arrival of Margaret Qualley’s Cima, a widow living with her protective father, played by Guy Pearce, gives the film a more intimate direction. Hig’s search stops being purely geographical and becomes a question of whether he can permit himself another attachment. There is a genuinely appealing idea here: after civilization collapses, rebuilding might begin with something as small as admitting what you miss. A scene involving remembered pleasures and the rediscovery of recorded music points toward a warmer, more specific film. These moments work because they give loss a recognizable shape rather than treating sadness as a general condition.

Unfortunately, the tenderness never fully resolves the film’s unevenness. Its late detour involving Allison Janney pushes toward a much stranger, more extravagant register, making the surrounding restraint feel even more conspicuous. A movie can certainly contain romance, grief, savage violence, and grotesque eccentricity, but those elements need a stronger dramatic connection than they receive here. Harry Gregson-Williams’s acoustic guitar-laden score reinforces the reflective mood, though that gentleness also contributes to the sense that the film is cushioning experiences that should leave sharper marks. Scott wants contemplation and danger to coexist; too often, they simply take turns.

What makes The Dog Stars frustrating is not its refusal to turn the apocalypse into nonstop combat. Its interest in companionship, grief, and the possibility of hope is welcome. The disappointment is that Scott gives those ideas such a uniformly subdued treatment that they lose force. This should be a story about discovering reasons to live in a world organized around staying alive. Instead, it too often settles for attractive desolation, familiar threats, and sadness presented as depth. There are touching moments and striking landscapes along the way, but the journey promises a greater emotional destination than it finally reaches.

Brad’s “Scene of the Day” features Michael Douglas in BLACK RAIN (1989)!


BLACK RAIN opened on September 22nd, 1989, and I’ve been a big fan since the first time I saw it. Director Ridley Scott creates a visual masterpiece where ethically challenged supercop Nick Conklin (Michael Douglas) and his tragically fated, but fun, partner Charlie Vincent (Andy Garcia) head to Japan to deliver a yakuza murderer to the authorities. When the prisoner gives them the slip, they stay over in the Land of the Rising Son and engage in a clash of cultures with strait laced Japanese cop Masahiro (Japanese cinematic legend Ken Takakura) as they all try recapture their man. Needless to say, things don’t always go well.

I’ve chosen the opening sequence where Michael looks extremely cool riding his motorcycle while Greg Allman sings “I’ll Be Holding On” over some pretty impressive credits. Enjoy my friends.

Review: Legend (dir. by Ridley Scott)


“What is light without dark? What are you without me? I am a part of you all. You can never defeat me. We are brothers eternal!” — Darkness

Legend is one of those films that feels like it should be a masterpiece even before it begins. It has Ridley Scott behind the camera, an extravagant fantasy premise, elaborate practical effects, striking production design, and a cast that includes a young Tom Cruise, Mia Sara, and Tim Curry. Released in 1985, the film arrived as a dark fantasy event that had been heavily anticipated, especially because Scott had already earned a reputation for visually stunning films. Alien and Blade Runner had established him as a director who could make entire worlds feel tactile, mysterious, and overwhelming. The idea of Scott applying that sensibility to unicorns, goblins, forest sprites, demonic lords, and fairy-tale mythology was exciting on paper. Unfortunately, while Legend is often gorgeous to look at, it becomes an uneven mess that is only saved from becoming a major disappointment by Tim Curry’s performance as Darkness.

The setup is familiar enough to sound almost deliberately archetypal. In a magical forest, Jack, played by Cruise, is a woodland boy who lives in harmony with nature and has fallen in love with the innocent Princess Lili, played by Sara. The world’s balance is tied to a pair of unicorns, embodiments of purity and light. Darkness, a devil-like ruler who wishes to plunge the world into permanent night, sends his goblin servants to kill the unicorns and take one of their horns. Lili’s fascination with the unicorns sets the tragedy in motion, and once one of the creatures is slain, winter and darkness descend upon the land. Jack must rescue Lili, restore the horn, defeat Darkness, and return light to the world.

There is nothing inherently wrong with a simple fairy-tale plot. In fact, Scott’s strongest instinct in Legend is treating fantasy with a sense of visual seriousness. The forest does not look like a clean studio set built for children; it looks damp, overgrown, foggy, and vaguely dangerous. The trees loom like ancient creatures, shafts of light break through the branches in painterly bursts, and even the beautiful areas of the film carry an eerie quality. Scott and cinematographer Alex Thomson create images that often resemble illustrated storybooks poisoned by a nightmare. The film’s environments are its greatest achievement. Whether it is the glowing forest, the icy wasteland after the unicorn’s death, or Darkness’ fire-lit underworld, Legend makes a serious effort to create a fully realized fantasy space rather than simply dressing actors in costumes and placing them in generic medieval scenery.

That visual commitment is why the film remains so fascinating despite its flaws. You can pause almost anywhere and find something worth admiring: a strange creature in the background, smoke drifting through a cavern, an enormous set textured with roots and stone, or a costume that looks handmade rather than mass-produced. Scott’s eye for atmosphere is undeniable. The film has an unusual physicality, too. Its magic is created through prosthetics, makeup, puppetry, matte work, and elaborate sets, so even when some effects have aged, they retain a handmade charm. Modern fantasy often has the advantage of digital flexibility, but Legend has the kind of tactile design that makes its world feel like it has dirt under its fingernails.

Still, visual beauty cannot completely compensate for a story that never finds a consistent rhythm. Legend often feels less like a fully developed narrative than a collection of spectacular images and half-formed fairy-tale ideas. Characters appear with little introduction, emotional shifts happen abruptly, and major story developments can feel rushed or strangely underexplained. The theatrical cut in particular carries the sense that important connective material has been removed. There are moments when the movie seems to expect emotional investment simply because the images are grand or the music swells, but the script has not done enough to earn that reaction.

Jack is also an unusually bland hero for a film that needs a strong center. Cruise was still early in his career, and there are flashes of the screen presence that would soon make him a major star. He is physically committed and looks believable racing through forests, climbing ruins, and confronting danger. But Jack is written as a generic pure-hearted fantasy protagonist, and Cruise never gets enough material to make him feel specific. He is brave because the story says he is brave, romantic because the story says he loves Lili, and destined to save the world because that is what these stories require. He does not have much inner conflict beyond the expected guilt and determination.

Lili is similarly underwritten, although Mia Sara does bring a dreamy, otherworldly quality to the role. The film wants her to embody innocence, temptation, and romantic idealism, but it does not give her much agency until she becomes corrupted by Darkness’ influence. Her transformation into a dark bride is visually memorable, especially in the elaborate black gown and makeup, but it also highlights the film’s habit of prioritizing imagery over character. The sequence is beautiful, eerie, and loaded with gothic fantasy appeal, yet Lili’s emotional journey into that role feels more decorative than dramatically convincing.

The supporting characters are more colorful but not always more useful. The dwarfs, elves, and forest companions give the story occasional energy, particularly the sarcastic fairy Oona and the armored dwarf Gump. Yet their presence can make the film feel tonally scattered. Sometimes Legend wants to be haunting and mythic; sometimes it wants broad comic relief; sometimes it drifts toward romantic melodrama. Those modes do not always blend. The result is a movie that can move from an ominous demonic ritual to a goofy side-character exchange without establishing a stable tone.

Then there is Tim Curry, who walks into the movie and immediately makes every other problem less important. His Darkness is one of the most iconic fantasy villains ever put on screen, and it is not difficult to understand why. The makeup design alone is astounding: massive horns, red skin, cloven hooves, muscular proportions, and a towering silhouette that makes him look like a medieval illustration of Satan brought to life. But the design would be nothing without Curry’s performance. He does not merely hide beneath the prosthetics; he gives Darkness a voice, posture, and seductive intelligence.

Curry plays Darkness as both monstrous and theatrical. His deep, measured delivery turns lines about night, desire, and evil into something genuinely alluring. He understands that the character should not simply roar or sneer. Darkness is persuasive. He offers Lili beauty, power, and escape from innocence, which makes him more interesting than a villain who only threatens destruction. His scenes with Sara have a strange, almost operatic energy, mixing horror, seduction, and camp in a way that fits the film’s most ambitious visual impulses. Curry makes Darkness feel ancient, vain, cruel, romantic, and weirdly funny all at once. He gives Legend its pulse.

The famous confrontation between Jack and Darkness should be the film’s crowning achievement, and visually it almost is. Darkness’ lair, lit by flames and surrounded by infernal architecture, gives Scott room to indulge his talent for monumental images. Curry’s villain towers over Cruise, making the hero look small and vulnerable. Yet even here, the fight is more memorable for its atmosphere than its dramatic construction. It is a good example of the whole film: rich in aesthetic invention, less persuasive as storytelling.

The music also reflects the movie’s fractured identity. Different versions of Legend are associated with different scores, most notably the Jerry Goldsmith score and the Tangerine Dream soundtrack used in the American theatrical release. The Goldsmith material feels more classically mythic and orchestral, while Tangerine Dream’s electronic music gives the film a distinctly 1980s dream-pop atmosphere. Both have their supporters, and both alter the experience considerably. That split feels appropriate for a movie that has always existed in multiple forms and competing moods. Legend is never quite one thing.

In the end, Legend is a flawed cult fantasy rather than a lost masterpiece. Its reputation rests largely on its imagery, its practical craftsmanship, and Curry’s towering performance, not on the strength of its plot or its emotional depth. Ridley Scott clearly wanted to make a dark fairy tale that felt ancient and sensual, but the finished film too often gets trapped between mythic grandeur, children’s fantasy, gothic romance, and broad adventure comedy. It is an uneven mess, but it is a beautiful one. And every time Tim Curry’s Darkness enters the frame, Legend briefly becomes the extraordinary film it was always trying to be.

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special Tim Curry Edition


4 Or More Shots From 4 Or More Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

Rest in Peace, Mr. Tim Curry.

4 Shots From 4 Tim Curry Films

The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975, dir by Jim Sharman)

Clue (1985, dir by Jonathan Lynn)

Legend (1985, dir by Ridley Scott)

It (1990, dir by Tommy Lee Wallace)

Villain of the Day: Darkness (Legend)


“Dreams are my specialty. Through dreams I influence mankind. My dream is of eternity… with you.” — Darkness

In the hall of fame cinematic evil, few figures loom as large—both literally and figuratively—as Darkness, the demonic antagonist of Ridley Scott’s 1985 fantasy film Legend. While the film itself is a flawed, sumptuous fever dream of unicorns, goblins, and saccharine innocence, its enduring legacy rests squarely on the cloven shoulders of its primary antagonist. Darkness is not merely a monster or a plot obstacle; he is the philosophical and aesthetic center of the film, a being of pure, conscious malevolence who articulates the seductive logic of eternal night. Yet, for all his cosmic horror, he remains a surprisingly relatable figure, a tyrant who exudes weary boredom and theatrical pique. This complexity is entirely the work of Tim Curry, whose performance elevates what could have been a one-note bogeyman into one of the most flamboyant, charismatic, and unforgettable devils ever committed to celluloid.

Tim Curry’s physical transformation into the Lord of Darkness is, in itself, a masterclass in prosthetic commitment, but it is his performance beneath the latex that breathes terrifying life into the horns. Under layers of crimson makeup, sculpted muscle, and ram-like horns, Curry’s most potent weapon is his voice—a resonating, purring baritone that slithers between a seductive whisper and a thunderous roar. He delivers dialogue like a Shakespearean actor chewing rich, decadent scenery, imbuing lines about “the glory of the night” with a sensual, almost poetic conviction. Yet, Curry never lets the grandeur become ponderous. He injects a wicked, knowing levity into the role, a mischievous twinkle in his prosthetic-lidded eyes that suggests the Devil is not just evil, but is having a genuinely good time being so. This is the Tim Curry “sass” in full effect: a raised eyebrow, a sarcastic drawl, and a contemptuous flick of his clawed hand that makes his Darkness feel less like an ancient, faceless god and more like a decadent, immortal rock star who has grown bored with eternity.

What makes Curry’s portrayal so revolutionary is his ability to make Darkness a mesmerizing and charismatic figure who outshines the film’s ostensible hero, Jack, played by a young, earnest Tom Cruise. Cruise’s Jack is the quintessential pure-hearted faerie-tale protagonist—brave, wholesome, and tragically one-dimensional. He fights for love and light with a fervent sincerity that, while admirable, lacks texture or conflict. In contrast, Curry’s Darkness is a creature of profound, articulate desire; he wants to extinguish the sun not out of mindless spite, but to create a world where his aesthetic of shadow and chaos can flourish. He offers Lily (Mia Sara) a crown of stars and an eternity of passion, a temptation far more intellectually and emotionally engaging than Jack’s simple, chaste devotion. When Curry shares the screen with Cruise, the film’s energy shifts palpably; the audience’s attention is irrevocably drawn to the demon’s throne room, leaving the hero’s quest feeling like a tedious errand.

Crucially, Curry’s Darkness transcends mere villainy by possessing a startlingly human vulnerability, a pathos that makes him more than a symbol of absolute evil. He is a creature of immense power, yet he is bound by cosmic rules and frustrated by the very light he seeks to destroy. There is a weary, jaded quality to his performance, a sense that he has been playing this game of cosmic chess for eons and is irritated by its predictability. When he is ultimately defeated, it is not with a grand, defiant curse, but with a quiet, almost melancholic acknowledgment of fate. This fleeting moment of resignation, delivered with Curry’s signature subtlety, adds a layer of tragic grandeur to the character. He is not just a devil; he is a failed artist of darkness, a monarch who has lost his kingdom, and Curry ensures we feel the weight of that loss, even as we cheer for his vanquishment.

In the end, Ridley Scott’s Legend is a flawed tapestry of light and shadow, but Tim Curry’s Darkness is the golden thread that holds it all together. He gave the Devil a flair that was both terrifying and deliciously camp, a combination that has cemented his performance in the horror-fantasy hall of fame. While Tom Cruise’s Jack may be the film’s designated hero, he serves primarily as a straight man to Curry’s operatic villainy. Decades later, audiences may forget the plot’s intricate details or the film’s lush visuals, but they will never forget the sight of Curry rising from his throne, horns silhouetted against the fire, and purring his seductive threats. He proved that the most compelling evil is not a mindless beast, but a charismatic, sassy, and deeply intelligent force of nature—one who makes the eternal struggle between good and evil feel less like a battle and more like a spectacular, unforgettable show.

Villain of the Day

I Watched G.I. Jane (1997, Dir. by Ridley Scott)


Demi Moore plays the first woman ever to be accepted for Navy SEAL training.  Anne Bancroft plays the senator who sponsored her but secretly wants her to fail.  Viggo Mortensen is the hardass drill sergeant who I think is secretly in love with Demi Moore even though he doesn’t admit it during the movie.  Ridley Scott directed, so the movie looks and sounds great.  Demi shaves her head and tells Viggo to “Suck my dick.”  All the other SEALS-in-training start shouting, “Suck my dick!” at each other.  It becomes their rallying cry.  That will put the fear in the hearts of America’s enemies.

When I first saw G.I. Jane, I really liked it.  I got really caught up in whether or not Demi Moore would complete her training and prove all the chauvinists wrong.  Rewatching the movie today, I realized that it was silly for me to worry about whether or not Demi Moore would become a SEAL.  Of course she does!  If she didn’t, the movie would be a real downer.  This movie was made back when Demi Moore was always cast as serious women who never laughed and who were always intense.  If they didn’t let Demi Moore become a SEAL, she would have burned down the entire Navy.

Rewatching, I still liked the movie.  Demi Moore and Viggo Mortensen having a glare-off?  Be still my beating heart!  Demi Moore wants to become a SEAL but Sen. Anne Bancroft betrays her.  So much for sisterhood!  Is the movie saying that women belong in combat but not the Senate?  It better not be!  Maybe we need a sequel where Demi Moore takes down the new Ayatollah and then runs for the Senate.

I wanted to end this review by telling you about the real first woman to complete Navy SEAL training but I discovered that hasn’t happened yet.  Hopefully, it will soon.  Demi Moore didn’t shave her head for nothing.

4 Shots From 4 Films: Escape Into Fantasy


4 Or More Shots From 4 Or More Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

4 Shots From 4 Fantasy Films

Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975, Dir. by Terry Gilliam and Terry Jones)

Legend (1985, Dir. by Ridley Scott)

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001, Dir by Peter Jackson)

How To Train Your Dragon (2010, Dir. by Chris Sanders and Dean DeBlois)

Horror Scenes That I Love: Ripley’s Last Stand in Alien


Since today is Sigourney Weaver’s birthday, I think it’s probably a given that today’s scene of the day would feature her defeating an alien.  In this scene from 1979’s Alien, Ripley shows why she is the last human survivor of the Nostromo.

(As cool as Ripley is, she’s still nowhere close to being as much of a badass as Jonesy the Cat.  Jonesy just had to hiss and the alien knew better than to mess with the ship’s cat.)

4 Shots From 4 Films: Visions of the Future


4 Or More Shots From 4 Or More Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

Who can see the future?

4 Shots From 4 Futuristic Films

Metropolis (1927, Dir. by Fritz Lang)

The Terminator (1984, Dir. by James Cameron)

Star Trek (2009, Dir. by JJ Abrams)

Prometheus (2012, Dir by Ridley Scott)

Scenes That I Love: Meet Rick Deckard in Blade Runner


Continuing our theme of dystopian noir, today’s scene of the day comes from 1982’s Blade Runner.  In this scene, we not only meet Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) but we also get a look at the future of Los Angeles, from both the sky and the ground.

(Of course, the film takes place in 2019 so its future is our past!)

This is one of the best world-building scenes that I’ve ever seen, one that works because it takes place in a world we can recognize but which has obviously developed and changed over the years.  Plus, I just like Harrison Ford wearing a trench coat and looking grumpy.  He should have done more noirs.