Brad reviews the new South Korean film HOPE (2026)! 


I’ve been seeing trailers for the South Korean action film HOPE (2026). Being a fan of the country’s cinema, it definitely piqued my interest. As I investigated a little further, I saw that it was written and directed by Na Hong-Jin who did the same for the unsettling THE WAILING back in 2016. Digging even deeper, I recognized actor Hwang Jung-Min as the lead of the film. He’s been great for a long time, starring in South Korean classics like A BITTERSWEET LIFE (2005), NEW WORLD (2013), VETERAN (2015), and the director’s THE WAILING. This being my birthday week, I decided I’d start it off with a bang by heading to the movie theater to see what this intriguing film has up its sleeves! 

The movie gets right into the action as we meet small town Police Chief Beom Seok (Hwang Jung-Min) in the middle of his investigation of the vicious death of a cow. The incident was reported by a group of hunters who think the wounds look out of the ordinary. Wondering if a bear or a tiger might be on prowl as he’s driving back, he arrives in town where all hell has broken loose. It seems there’s something causing death and destruction, but it’s way too powerful to be a bear or a tiger. I won’t say anymore because the fun of the first half of the film is discovering just what the hell is bringing such chaos to this normally sleepy harbor town. 

HOPE has a lot of good stuff going for it. The performances from the leads are at the very top of my list, beginning with Hwang Jung-min as the police chief. He has this ability to project goofy exasperation better than anyone else I know. A lesser actor might take this too far, but not Hwang. He is able to balance the film’s absurd humor while also being tough and fearless when he needs to be. He’s great here. Next up is Hoyeon (SQUID GAME), who plays police officer Sung Ae. I won’t say too much, but her character’s introduction into the film is incredibly fun and badass. I loved it, and you can’t help but love her as the film progresses. Finally, I really enjoyed actor Zo In-sung’s performance as one of the hunters who reports the suspicious cow death at the beginning of the film. At first he seems like a guy being set up as a victim, but he turns out to be much more than that by the end. I’ll have to give writer Na Hong-jin credit for creating such fun characters. I’ll mention here that Michael Fassbender and Alicia Vikander are also in the cast, but I won’t say anything more about their characters. 

After actually watching the film, I can say that writer-director Na Hong-jin really did come up with a very interesting premise for HOPE. The first half of the film is so fun as our characters fight for their lives and simultaneously try to figure out what the hell they’re dealing with. I would say this is the best section of the film. When we finally see what our ragtag group is up against, we get an exciting, non-stop action sequence that ends with a bit of luck and relief for our heroes. Up to this point, the movie has been a violent, funny, action-packed ride!

The second half of the film, while still enjoyable, isn’t quite as successful as the first. The primary issue is the extreme length of the film. HOPE clocks in at over two and a half hours. While it continues on as a non-stop action ride, I think this movie would be just as good at only two hours long by cutting some repetitive action sequences. The last part of the film introduces a whole new storyline solely to set up future sequels. HOPE had the biggest box office opening weekend in South Korea thus far in 2026, so the sequels will definitely be coming. I’m certainly looking forward to them, but if you’re looking for closure for any of these characters, you won’t get it here. There is an almost unbelievable mid-credits sequence that’s truly absurd, but it’s also not out of line with the craziness of the film we just watched. Don’t miss that part! 

For me, watching HOPE at the theater was 100% worth my time and an awesome start to my birthday week. It’s not a perfect film, but I truly enjoyed it, and I’ll be on the lookout for the sequels! 

Review: The Chaser (dir. by Na Hong-jin)


“Find that bastard.” – Eom Joong-ho

You know that feeling when a thriller drags you so deep into its messiness that you forget to breathe? That’s The Chaser for most of its runtime, but it’s also a movie that stumbles as often as it sprints. Directed by Na Hong-jin in his feature debut back in 2008, this South Korean thriller doesn’t play by the usual rules. It’s not about a genius detective outsmarting a methodical killer. It’s about a washed-up, broke ex-cop turned pimp who stumbles into a serial murder case because one of his girls went missing and, frankly, he wants his money back. That blunt, ugly premise sets the tone for what follows: raw, desperate, and uncomfortably human. But being a first-time effort, The Chaser also shows its seams—clunky pacing in places, a few too many convenient coincidences, and an ending that tries for tragedy but sometimes feels more like the writer painted himself into a corner.

Let’s talk about our unlikely “hero,” Joong-ho, played with permanent five-o’clock shadow and simmering rage by Kim Yoon-seok. He’s not a good guy. He runs an escort service, slaps his girls around when they’re difficult, and only starts looking for one of them, Mi-jin, because her disappearance means lost profit. But here’s the tricky part Na Hong-jin pulls off: you still root for him. Joong-ho is tired, cynical, and beaten down by life, but underneath the scuzziness is a man who has seen too much corruption and feels a prick of responsibility when he realizes a customer might be a monster. The film doesn’t redeem him—he never turns into a noble saint—but it gives him a blunt, stubborn engine that feels real. That said, his character arc is more of a flat line. He doesn’t really change or learn anything by the end; he just gets more exhausted. For a debut, that’s a common shortcut—confusing intensity with development.

The killer, Young-min (Ha Jung-woo), is the opposite of what you’d expect. He’s not a lurking shadow or a theatrical psycho. He’s a soft-spoken guy with a pale, ordinary face who lives in a nondescript house. When Joong-ho first tracks him down through a phone number, Young-min calmly admits he took the girl, and then he calmly admits he probably killed her. The chilling part? He can’t remember the exact number of victims. He keeps a photo collection, but his memory is foggy from a brain injury. That detail is clever. It strips away the “mastermind” trope and leaves you with something more disturbing: a man who kills almost casually, like a bad habit he can’t quite recall. But the film never really explores why that brain injury matters beyond giving Young-min an occasional blank stare. As a debut flaw, it’s the kind of half-baked motivation that a more experienced director might have fleshed out or cut entirely.

What separates The Chaser from a typical cat-and-mouse thriller is how it weaponizes time and bad luck. The whole movie takes place over a day and a half, and every missed connection feels like a punch to the gut. At one point, Joong-ho drives right past the house where Mi-jin is still alive but bleeding out, because he’s following a different lead. Later, the police release Young-min on a technicality—lack of evidence—moments before Joong-ho finds crucial proof. You’ll scream at the screen. But here’s the thing: not all of these near-misses feel earned. Some of them rely on characters making decisions that are less “human error” and more “plot convenience.” For a debut director, balancing realism with momentum is tough, and Na Hong-jin sometimes tips too far into frustration for its own sake. The chase scenes aren’t slick; they’re clumsy and exhausting, which works in theory, but in practice, a couple of them drag on long enough that you start checking the runtime.

Then there’s Mi-jin (Seo Yeong-hie), the missing escort. For most thrillers, she’d be a corpse or a victim trophy. But The Chaser spends real time with her after she escapes Young-min’s basement—badly injured, confused, dragging herself through dark alleys. We see her call her young daughter. We see her haggle with a convenience store owner for a bandage. She’s not a plot device; she’s a tired single mom trying to survive. That’s genuinely good writing. However, the film also sidelines her for long stretches in the middle act, and when she reappears, the emotional payoff feels rushed. It’s a common debut problem: wanting to do justice to a supporting character but not yet knowing how to balance screen time across a whole cast.

Visually, the film is drenched in muted grays and wet streets. This isn’t the neon-lit Seoul of Oldboy or the slick gloss of I Saw the Devil. It’s rainy, cramped apartments, rundown police stations, and the kind of low-budget grit that makes everything feel lived-in and hopeless. That’s a strength. But the camerawork can get distractingly shaky, especially in dialogue scenes where no one is running. You can tell Na Hong-jin comes from a documentary background—sometimes it adds urgency, other times it feels like they forgot to set up a tripod. The sound design is nastier than the visuals: bones crack audibly, hammers thud on tile, and a child’s voice over a phone cuts through like glass. The score is barely there, which works until it doesn’t—some scenes feel a little too dry, a little too quiet, like the director was afraid of seeming manipulative.

What becomes increasingly difficult to ignore as The Chaser progresses is how the film’s portrayal of police incompetence drifts from pointed social critique into something closer to farce, yet without ever fully committing to satire. The detectives aren’t just flawed—they’re written as so hilariously useless that the movie flirts with dark comedy, but then pulls back. Are we supposed to laugh at the officer who falls asleep during a murder confession, or are we supposed to feel outraged? The tonal whiplash suggests Na Hong-jin wasn’t sure how far to push the absurdity, which is a common growing pain for a first-time director trying to balance genre beats with real-world cynicism. Also, the ending has become famous for its bleakness, but on a second watch, some of that bleakness feels forced. Without spoiling anything, the final fifteen minutes rely on a string of bad luck that would strain belief in a Final Destination movie. For a film that otherwise prides itself on gritty realism, that stretch feels like a debut director overcorrecting—trying too hard to avoid a happy ending and landing on something that’s more exhausting than meaningful.

If you compare The Chaser to Na Hong-jin’s later work, like The Yellow Sea or The Wailing, you can see the bones of a great filmmaker learning to control his impulses. Here, he throws everything at the wall: grueling chase scenes, social commentary about corrupt policing, a serial killer who isn’t a genius, a protagonist who isn’t a hero. Some of it sticks. Some of it slides off. The movie is too long by about fifteen minutes, and the middle section sags under the weight of repeated near-misses that start to feel less like tragedy and more like the director twisting the knife for the sake of it.

In the end, The Chaser is a good but uneven thriller. It’s not the masterpiece some fans claim, and it’s not a failure either. It’s a debut film with genuine energy, a couple of great performances, and a willingness to be ugly and uncomfortable. But it also has pacing issues, tonal confusion, and a third act that mistakes relentless misery for emotional depth. Watch it for Kim Yoon-seok’s grimy determination and Ha Jung-woo’s creepy blankness. Just don’t expect the polish of a veteran director. Na Hong-jin would get there later. Here, he’s still chasing his own potential.

Here Are the 2016 Seattle Film Award Nominees!


Here are the 2016 Seattle Film Award Nominees!  I don’t know what the cat’s yawning about; these nominations are actually an interesting mix of the usual suspects (Moonlight, Manchester, La La Land) and a few unexpected but intriguing picks (like 13th and The Witch).

THE 2016 SEATTLE FILM AWARD NOMINEES:

BEST PICTURE OF THE YEAR:

BEST DIRECTOR:

  • Damien Chazelle – La La Land
  • Robert EggersThe Witch
  • Barry JenkinsMoonlight
  • Paul Verhoeven – Elle
  • Denis Villeneuve – Arrival

BEST ACTOR in a LEADING ROLE:

  • Casey Affleck – Manchester By The Sea
  • Ryan GoslingLa La Land
  • Logan Lerman – Indignation
  • Viggo Mortensen – Captain Fantastic
  • Denzel Washington – Fences

BEST ACTRESS in a LEADING ROLE:

  • Amy Adams – Arrival
  • Kate Beckinsale – Love & Friendship
  • Isabelle Huppert – Elle
  • Natalie Portman – Jackie
  • Emma StoneLa La Land

BEST ACTOR in a SUPPORTING ROLE:

BEST ACTRESS in a SUPPORTING ROLE:

  • Viola Davis – Fences
  • Lily Gladstone – Certain Women
  • Naomie HarrisMoonlight
  • Kate McKinnonGhostbusters
  • Michelle Williams – Manchester By The Sea

BEST ENSEMBLE CAST:

BEST SCREENPLAY:

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE:

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM:

  • EllePaul Verhoeven, director
  • The HandmaidenPark Chan-wook, director
  • The InnocentsAnne Fontaine, director
  • Under The ShadowBabak Anvari, director
  • The WailingNa Hong-jin, director

BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE:

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY:

BEST COSTUME DESIGN:

BEST FILM EDITING:

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE:

BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN:

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS:

BEST YOUTH PERFORMANCE (18 years of age or younger upon start of filming):

BEST VILLAIN:

10_Cloverfield_Lane