Horror Film Review: The Wailing (dir. by Na Hong-jin)


“Not everything that moves, breathes, and talks is alive.” — Il-gwang

For about an hour, The Wailing pretends to be a detective story. There’s a series of bizarre deaths in a remote village, a suspect who fits nobody’s profile but everyone’s prejudices, a witness with a wild story, and a cop digging for the truth. Everything about Na Hong-jin’s 2016 film is structured like an investigation — interviews, evidence gathering, surveillance photos, a timeline of incidents. The twist is that this is a detective story where the crime scene is the entire world, the culprit may not be a person at all, and every tool the genre normally hands you to solve the case is precisely the thing that gets people killed. Watching it, you keep waiting for the reveal that ties everything together, and slowly it dawns on you: the movie has been quietly teaching you that some cases can’t be closed, and that a detective who can’t accept that is the most dangerous man in the film.

The setup is beautifully simple. In a small village called Gokseong (which gives the film its Korean title), people start getting sick. Then they start getting violent — wild-eyed, homicidal, creepier than your standard zombie by a wide margin. At the center of it all is Jong-goo, a chubby, cowardly, deeply ordinary local policeman played by Kwak Do-won, whose daughter Hyo-jin falls mysteriously ill after the family has a run-in with a stranger. Rumors quickly gather around that stranger, a Japanese man who lives alone in the mountains (Jun Kunimura), who fishes, photographs things he shouldn’t be photographing, and was reportedly seen at the scene of one of the killings. The village has already convicted him; Jong-goo, half-convinced and half-scared, decides to build the case, and the more evidence he collects, the worse everything gets.

What makes The Wailing special isn’t the premise, though — it’s how Na stacks unreliable testimony on top of unreliable evidence until the whole movie feels like a case file with every page contradicting the last. You’ve got a shaman, Il-gwang (Hwang Jung-min, having an absolute blast), who performs one of the most electric exorcism sequences ever filmed, all drums and chanting and animal sacrifice, cross-cut with something else I won’t spoil — essentially an expert witness with his own competing theory. That sequence alone is worth the price of admission: a frantic, drum-driven standoff between two rituals playing out simultaneously, with Na cutting between them faster and faster until you realize he’s using suspense-film grammar to stage a theological argument. You’ve got a mysterious young woman in white (Chun Woo-hee), who shows up with her own version of events, a burned-down house, a zombie-looking guy in the rain, and a very unlucky police partner who keeps finding the worst possible things at the worst possible times.

The genius of the movie is that every one of these characters confidently testifies about what’s happening, and they can’t all be right. Is the Japanese man a demon? A ghost? Just a scapegoated outsider? Is the woman in white a guardian or the actual source of the evil? Is the shaman a fraud or the only person who knows what he’s doing? The film keeps handing you exhibits, then yanking them away — the procedural pleasure of gathering clues, weaponized against you. There’s a scene with photographs that made my stomach drop, a hair tie that functions as a gut-punch with zero gore, and an interview over a cigarette break that recontextualizes the entire first hour. Na shoots all of it in gorgeous, humid, rain-soaked widescreen — this is a beautiful film about terrible things, all green mountains, wet fields, and pale sunlight — and the unhurried pacing isn’t padding, it’s the point: it lets you settle into the village’s rhythm so that each new irregularity registers as a wrong note in a familiar song. The horror rarely announces itself; it’s just suddenly there, sitting in the frame, and half the time you notice it before the characters do.

The folklore texture deserves its own shout-out. Na reportedly built the film from real shamanic traditions, rural superstitions, and his own questions about why inexplicable suffering happens, and you feel that authenticity in every ritual scene. This isn’t Hollywood exorcism-by-numbers; the shamanism feels lived-in, transactional, dangerous, and the film even works in bits of everyday folk logic — the old rule that meeting someone’s gaze means you’ve seen a ghost, the black hair nailed to a door, the persistent Korean dread of the Japanese stranger as a carryover of historical wounds. The title itself points at the movie’s worldview — there’s an old belief that a spirit’s wail can possess the living — and the film is smart enough to treat belief, not just demons, as the thing doing damage. When an entire village decides someone is a monster, what happens next is horror regardless of the supernatural facts.

Performance-wise, this is Kwak Do-won’s movie. His Jong-goo is one of the great horror protagonists precisely because he’s not brave, not sharp, and not special — he’s a tired dad making guesses, and every wrong guess costs him. You watch a decent, dim man get dismantled piece by piece, and the film’s darkest trick is making you complicit in his worst decision. Jun Kunimura is remarkable in a role that requires him to be sinister, pitiable, and genuinely terrifying depending on which scene you’re watching — the man can shift the temperature of a room just by deciding whether to make eye contact. Hwang Jung-min goes full rock-star shaman and steals the middle of the movie, and Chun Woo-hee does extraordinary work with a character who has to work on two levels at once: every time she speaks, you’re simultaneously calmed by her and checking the frame for what she might really be.

Now, fair warnings. The pacing is slow, especially in the first hour, and the runtime is a hefty 156 minutes. If you need jump scares every ten minutes or a third act that explains itself, this will test you. There’s also animal harm on screen, which I know is a dealbreaker for some folks. And the ambiguity is total — people walk out having landed on completely opposite conclusions, and I genuinely think the film is more layered on a second viewing, since the dialogue is full of lines that read completely differently once you know how things shake out. But Na leaves one crucial scene open-ended on purpose, because the whole point is that certainty, in the face of real evil, is a luxury nobody gets.

And that’s what elevates The Wailing above most possession movies. It’s a horror film about epistemology, honestly — about how we decide what to believe, who benefits from our belief, and how being unable to choose can be the most dangerous state of all. The village looked at a stranger and closed its case; Jong-goo spends the whole film trying to close his, following every lead, consulting every expert, and the movie watches what each conclusion costs him. There’s a line near the end, about trusting versus doubting, that lands like a knife because the entire film has been secretly about that question. The scariest thing in The Wailing isn’t the demon; it’s the idea that you could do everything right and still lose everyone you love because you hesitated a moment too long.

So, where does it land? For my money, The Wailing is a masterpiece of modern horror and easily one of the best South Korean films of the 2010s — a decade that includes Train to Busan, The Handmaiden, and Parasite, which tells you how competitive that field is. It’s not a crowd-pleaser in the jump-scare sense; it’s a slow-burn, smoky, mystifying fever dream that rewards patience and punishes assumptions. Watch it late, watch it with subtitles, don’t look up anything beforehand, and let it mess with you. Most detective stories end with the case closed and the world set right; The Wailing ends with the file left open on the desk, because Na Hong-jin’s real subject was never whodunit — it was the hubris of assuming that every mystery owes you an answer. That open file is exactly what keeps the film wailing in your head long after it’s over.

Brad reviews the new South Korean film HOPE (2026)! 


I’ve been seeing trailers for the South Korean action film HOPE (2026). Being a fan of the country’s cinema, it definitely piqued my interest. As I investigated a little further, I saw that it was written and directed by Na Hong-Jin who did the same for the unsettling THE WAILING back in 2016. Digging even deeper, I recognized actor Hwang Jung-Min as the lead of the film. He’s been great for a long time, starring in South Korean classics like A BITTERSWEET LIFE (2005), NEW WORLD (2013), VETERAN (2015), and the director’s THE WAILING. This being my birthday week, I decided I’d start it off with a bang by heading to the movie theater to see what this intriguing film has up its sleeves! 

The movie gets right into the action as we meet small town Police Chief Beom Seok (Hwang Jung-Min) in the middle of his investigation of the vicious death of a cow. The incident was reported by a group of hunters who think the wounds look out of the ordinary. Wondering if a bear or a tiger might be on prowl as he’s driving back, he arrives in town where all hell has broken loose. It seems there’s something causing death and destruction, but it’s way too powerful to be a bear or a tiger. I won’t say anymore because the fun of the first half of the film is discovering just what the hell is bringing such chaos to this normally sleepy harbor town. 

HOPE has a lot of good stuff going for it. The performances from the leads are at the very top of my list, beginning with Hwang Jung-min as the police chief. He has this ability to project goofy exasperation better than anyone else I know. A lesser actor might take this too far, but not Hwang. He is able to balance the film’s absurd humor while also being tough and fearless when he needs to be. He’s great here. Next up is Hoyeon (SQUID GAME), who plays police officer Sung Ae. I won’t say too much, but her character’s introduction into the film is incredibly fun and badass. I loved it, and you can’t help but love her as the film progresses. Finally, I really enjoyed actor Zo In-sung’s performance as one of the hunters who reports the suspicious cow death at the beginning of the film. At first he seems like a guy being set up as a victim, but he turns out to be much more than that by the end. I’ll have to give writer Na Hong-jin credit for creating such fun characters. I’ll mention here that Michael Fassbender and Alicia Vikander are also in the cast, but I won’t say anything more about their characters. 

After actually watching the film, I can say that writer-director Na Hong-jin really did come up with a very interesting premise for HOPE. The first half of the film is so fun as our characters fight for their lives and simultaneously try to figure out what the hell they’re dealing with. I would say this is the best section of the film. When we finally see what our ragtag group is up against, we get an exciting, non-stop action sequence that ends with a bit of luck and relief for our heroes. Up to this point, the movie has been a violent, funny, action-packed ride!

The second half of the film, while still enjoyable, isn’t quite as successful as the first. The primary issue is the extreme length of the film. HOPE clocks in at over two and a half hours. While it continues on as a non-stop action ride, I think this movie would be just as good at only two hours long by cutting some repetitive action sequences. The last part of the film introduces a whole new storyline solely to set up future sequels. HOPE had the biggest box office opening weekend in South Korea thus far in 2026, so the sequels will definitely be coming. I’m certainly looking forward to them, but if you’re looking for closure for any of these characters, you won’t get it here. There is an almost unbelievable mid-credits sequence that’s truly absurd, but it’s also not out of line with the craziness of the film we just watched. Don’t miss that part! 

For me, watching HOPE at the theater was 100% worth my time and an awesome start to my birthday week. It’s not a perfect film, but I truly enjoyed it, and I’ll be on the lookout for the sequels! 

Review: The Chaser (dir. by Na Hong-jin)


“Find that bastard.” – Eom Joong-ho

You know that feeling when a thriller drags you so deep into its messiness that you forget to breathe? That’s The Chaser for most of its runtime, but it’s also a movie that stumbles as often as it sprints. Directed by Na Hong-jin in his feature debut back in 2008, this South Korean thriller doesn’t play by the usual rules. It’s not about a genius detective outsmarting a methodical killer. It’s about a washed-up, broke ex-cop turned pimp who stumbles into a serial murder case because one of his girls went missing and, frankly, he wants his money back. That blunt, ugly premise sets the tone for what follows: raw, desperate, and uncomfortably human. But being a first-time effort, The Chaser also shows its seams—clunky pacing in places, a few too many convenient coincidences, and an ending that tries for tragedy but sometimes feels more like the writer painted himself into a corner.

Let’s talk about our unlikely “hero,” Joong-ho, played with permanent five-o’clock shadow and simmering rage by Kim Yoon-seok. He’s not a good guy. He runs an escort service, slaps his girls around when they’re difficult, and only starts looking for one of them, Mi-jin, because her disappearance means lost profit. But here’s the tricky part Na Hong-jin pulls off: you still root for him. Joong-ho is tired, cynical, and beaten down by life, but underneath the scuzziness is a man who has seen too much corruption and feels a prick of responsibility when he realizes a customer might be a monster. The film doesn’t redeem him—he never turns into a noble saint—but it gives him a blunt, stubborn engine that feels real. That said, his character arc is more of a flat line. He doesn’t really change or learn anything by the end; he just gets more exhausted. For a debut, that’s a common shortcut—confusing intensity with development.

The killer, Young-min (Ha Jung-woo), is the opposite of what you’d expect. He’s not a lurking shadow or a theatrical psycho. He’s a soft-spoken guy with a pale, ordinary face who lives in a nondescript house. When Joong-ho first tracks him down through a phone number, Young-min calmly admits he took the girl, and then he calmly admits he probably killed her. The chilling part? He can’t remember the exact number of victims. He keeps a photo collection, but his memory is foggy from a brain injury. That detail is clever. It strips away the “mastermind” trope and leaves you with something more disturbing: a man who kills almost casually, like a bad habit he can’t quite recall. But the film never really explores why that brain injury matters beyond giving Young-min an occasional blank stare. As a debut flaw, it’s the kind of half-baked motivation that a more experienced director might have fleshed out or cut entirely.

What separates The Chaser from a typical cat-and-mouse thriller is how it weaponizes time and bad luck. The whole movie takes place over a day and a half, and every missed connection feels like a punch to the gut. At one point, Joong-ho drives right past the house where Mi-jin is still alive but bleeding out, because he’s following a different lead. Later, the police release Young-min on a technicality—lack of evidence—moments before Joong-ho finds crucial proof. You’ll scream at the screen. But here’s the thing: not all of these near-misses feel earned. Some of them rely on characters making decisions that are less “human error” and more “plot convenience.” For a debut director, balancing realism with momentum is tough, and Na Hong-jin sometimes tips too far into frustration for its own sake. The chase scenes aren’t slick; they’re clumsy and exhausting, which works in theory, but in practice, a couple of them drag on long enough that you start checking the runtime.

Then there’s Mi-jin (Seo Yeong-hie), the missing escort. For most thrillers, she’d be a corpse or a victim trophy. But The Chaser spends real time with her after she escapes Young-min’s basement—badly injured, confused, dragging herself through dark alleys. We see her call her young daughter. We see her haggle with a convenience store owner for a bandage. She’s not a plot device; she’s a tired single mom trying to survive. That’s genuinely good writing. However, the film also sidelines her for long stretches in the middle act, and when she reappears, the emotional payoff feels rushed. It’s a common debut problem: wanting to do justice to a supporting character but not yet knowing how to balance screen time across a whole cast.

Visually, the film is drenched in muted grays and wet streets. This isn’t the neon-lit Seoul of Oldboy or the slick gloss of I Saw the Devil. It’s rainy, cramped apartments, rundown police stations, and the kind of low-budget grit that makes everything feel lived-in and hopeless. That’s a strength. But the camerawork can get distractingly shaky, especially in dialogue scenes where no one is running. You can tell Na Hong-jin comes from a documentary background—sometimes it adds urgency, other times it feels like they forgot to set up a tripod. The sound design is nastier than the visuals: bones crack audibly, hammers thud on tile, and a child’s voice over a phone cuts through like glass. The score is barely there, which works until it doesn’t—some scenes feel a little too dry, a little too quiet, like the director was afraid of seeming manipulative.

What becomes increasingly difficult to ignore as The Chaser progresses is how the film’s portrayal of police incompetence drifts from pointed social critique into something closer to farce, yet without ever fully committing to satire. The detectives aren’t just flawed—they’re written as so hilariously useless that the movie flirts with dark comedy, but then pulls back. Are we supposed to laugh at the officer who falls asleep during a murder confession, or are we supposed to feel outraged? The tonal whiplash suggests Na Hong-jin wasn’t sure how far to push the absurdity, which is a common growing pain for a first-time director trying to balance genre beats with real-world cynicism. Also, the ending has become famous for its bleakness, but on a second watch, some of that bleakness feels forced. Without spoiling anything, the final fifteen minutes rely on a string of bad luck that would strain belief in a Final Destination movie. For a film that otherwise prides itself on gritty realism, that stretch feels like a debut director overcorrecting—trying too hard to avoid a happy ending and landing on something that’s more exhausting than meaningful.

If you compare The Chaser to Na Hong-jin’s later work, like The Yellow Sea or The Wailing, you can see the bones of a great filmmaker learning to control his impulses. Here, he throws everything at the wall: grueling chase scenes, social commentary about corrupt policing, a serial killer who isn’t a genius, a protagonist who isn’t a hero. Some of it sticks. Some of it slides off. The movie is too long by about fifteen minutes, and the middle section sags under the weight of repeated near-misses that start to feel less like tragedy and more like the director twisting the knife for the sake of it.

In the end, The Chaser is a good but uneven thriller. It’s not the masterpiece some fans claim, and it’s not a failure either. It’s a debut film with genuine energy, a couple of great performances, and a willingness to be ugly and uncomfortable. But it also has pacing issues, tonal confusion, and a third act that mistakes relentless misery for emotional depth. Watch it for Kim Yoon-seok’s grimy determination and Ha Jung-woo’s creepy blankness. Just don’t expect the polish of a veteran director. Na Hong-jin would get there later. Here, he’s still chasing his own potential.

Here Are the 2016 Seattle Film Award Nominees!


Here are the 2016 Seattle Film Award Nominees!  I don’t know what the cat’s yawning about; these nominations are actually an interesting mix of the usual suspects (Moonlight, Manchester, La La Land) and a few unexpected but intriguing picks (like 13th and The Witch).

THE 2016 SEATTLE FILM AWARD NOMINEES:

BEST PICTURE OF THE YEAR:

BEST DIRECTOR:

  • Damien Chazelle – La La Land
  • Robert Eggers – The Witch
  • Barry Jenkins – Moonlight
  • Paul Verhoeven – Elle
  • Denis Villeneuve – Arrival

BEST ACTOR in a LEADING ROLE:

  • Casey Affleck – Manchester By The Sea
  • Ryan Gosling – La La Land
  • Logan Lerman – Indignation
  • Viggo Mortensen – Captain Fantastic
  • Denzel Washington – Fences

BEST ACTRESS in a LEADING ROLE:

  • Amy Adams – Arrival
  • Kate Beckinsale – Love & Friendship
  • Isabelle Huppert – Elle
  • Natalie Portman – Jackie
  • Emma Stone – La La Land

BEST ACTOR in a SUPPORTING ROLE:

BEST ACTRESS in a SUPPORTING ROLE:

  • Viola Davis – Fences
  • Lily Gladstone – Certain Women
  • Naomie Harris – Moonlight
  • Kate McKinnon – Ghostbusters
  • Michelle Williams – Manchester By The Sea

BEST ENSEMBLE CAST:

BEST SCREENPLAY:

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE:

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM:

  • Elle – Paul Verhoeven, director
  • The Handmaiden – Park Chan-wook, director
  • The Innocents – Anne Fontaine, director
  • Under The Shadow – Babak Anvari, director
  • The Wailing – Na Hong-jin, director

BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE:

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY:

BEST COSTUME DESIGN:

BEST FILM EDITING:

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE:

BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN:

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS:

BEST YOUTH PERFORMANCE (18 years of age or younger upon start of filming):

BEST VILLAIN:

10_Cloverfield_Lane