Film Review: Godzilla (dir. by Ishirō Honda)


“Godzilla was baptized in the fire of the H-bomb and survived. What could kill it now?” — Dr. Yamane

If your only exposure to Godzilla is the big guy body-slamming other monsters while kids cheer, the original 1954 Japanese Godzilla—titled Gojira in Japan—is going to hit you like a ton of bricks. Directed by Ishirō Honda, this isn’t a lighthearted monster romp. It’s a funeral procession in disguise, soaked in grief and dread, that happens to feature a radioactive giant stomping Tokyo into paste. Importantly, this is not the 1956 Americanized version, Godzilla, King of the Monsters!, which inserted newly filmed scenes of Raymond Burr as reporter Steve Martin, making him the central viewpoint character. Honda’s original is a different, heavier experience.

The setup is simple enough. Ships keep sinking, an island community connects the disasters to an old legend, and a prehistoric creature disturbed by hydrogen-bomb testing emerges from the sea. What follows builds toward one of the most devastating stretches of monster-movie filmmaking ever put to celluloid. When Godzilla attacks Tokyo, Honda shoots the rampage like a war picture, not a creature feature. There’s no wink, no reassuring invitation to laugh at the destruction. Night falls, the city burns, and civilians flee through the streets in scenes that are hard to shake. That’s clearly the point.

Here’s the thing you can’t separate from this movie: Japan was less than a decade removed from the end of World War II. Tokyo’s destruction onscreen bears an eerie resemblance to the aftermath of the American firebombing campaign of 1945, particularly the devastating March 9–10 raid. The burning neighborhoods, shattered buildings, and displaced civilians evoke a catastrophe that contemporary audiences didn’t need help imagining. Calling these sequences archival footage would go too far; they’re carefully constructed effects and dramatic scenes. But their emotional force comes partly from how closely this imagined disaster brushes against living memory. Honda makes the destruction feel remembered rather than merely invented.

The political undercurrent is what elevates Godzilla from an impressive genre exercise to something more troubling. The film is an unmistakable response to nuclear weapons and testing, made when hydrogen-bomb explosions in the Pacific were immediate public concerns. Its opening evokes the Lucky Dragon No. 5 incident, in which Japanese fishermen were exposed to radioactive fallout from an American hydrogen-bomb test at Bikini Atoll earlier that year. That wasn’t distant history to the original audience. It was the news. Godzilla turns that fear into a physical presence: something humanity has disturbed but cannot control.

The film’s concern with proliferation becomes clearest through Dr. Serizawa and his Oxygen Destroyer. He possesses a discovery that could kill Godzilla, but he understands that demonstrating its power could open the door to another arms race. The question isn’t simply whether this weapon can solve today’s emergency. It’s what happens when governments demand more of it tomorrow. That’s a sharper dilemma than the usual hunt for a monster-killing gadget. The proposed solution belongs to the same destructive cycle as the problem, and Serizawa knows that good intentions won’t keep his invention out of dangerous hands.

Dr. Yamane, played by a wonderfully grave Takashi Shimura, complicates things further by wanting Godzilla studied rather than destroyed. His position can seem maddening when people are dying, but it gives the creature an identity beyond walking target practice. Godzilla is dangerous, yet he’s also a living consequence of human interference. That doesn’t make killing him unnecessary, but it makes the victory harder to celebrate. Honda lets scientific curiosity, public safety, and moral responsibility pull against each other. The film’s strongest human conflict isn’t really about who gets the girl. It’s about what people owe one another when knowledge becomes destructive.

Special credit goes to Eiji Tsuburaya’s effects work. The creature suit, miniature buildings, and optical effects can look rough now, but dismissing them as cheap misses the ambition involved. This was a substantial production by contemporary Japanese standards, not a tiny-budget throwaway. The physical weight of the collapsing structures gives the rampage a tactile quality, while the black-and-white photography helps hold the illusion together. Akira Ifukube’s score supplies another crucial layer: those heavy rhythms and mournful passages make Godzilla feel less like an attraction than an approaching calamity. The images and music work together to give the monster tragic gravity.

Honda’s willingness to linger on suffering is even more important than the effects. A mother clutching her children and telling them they’ll soon join their father is a brutal interruption of anything resembling uncomplicated monster-movie fun. The hospital scenes refuse to let the attack end when Godzilla leaves the frame. Injured people remain, children face radiation examinations, and survival looks nothing like relief. These moments make the film’s anti-nuclear concerns inseparable from its storytelling. Honda doesn’t merely tell you that destruction is terrible. He keeps looking at the people who have to endure it.

Is the movie perfect? Not entirely. The love triangle between Emiko, Ogata, and Serizawa is more functional than riveting, and some explanatory passages slow the momentum. A few effects shots expose the gap between the filmmakers’ ambitions and their available techniques. But the sincerity carries it through. There’s no ironic safety net, and that directness becomes a strength. The same applies to the ending: Serizawa’s sacrifice is moving because it answers a moral crisis, not just a tactical one. He wants to stop the immediate catastrophe without leaving humanity another means of creating the next.

The American version deserves a little more fairness than simply calling it worthless: it retains powerful material, and Burr’s performance isn’t the problem. Still, its cuts and added viewpoint weaken the original’s political and emotional coherence. Honda’s Godzilla is the fuller experience, and one of science fiction’s enduring achievements. It helped define the modern kaiju film, but its importance goes beyond launching a franchise. Underneath the creature suit and miniature tanks is a serious film about wartime trauma, nuclear fear, and whether humanity can survive its own inventions. That’s a lot for a monster movie to carry. Honda makes it hurt.

Horror Film Review: Godzilla (dir by Luigi Cozzi, Inshiro Honda, and Terry Morse)


The year was 1976 and the flamboyant Italian producer, Dino de Laurentiis, was drumming up a lot of publicity for his remake of the monster classic, King Kong.  In Italy, the journalist, screenwriter, and director Luigi Cozzi assumed that the King Kong remake would be a huge hit and decided to get in on the action himself.  If Italian audiences loved a film about a big monkey, how about a film about a big radioactive lizard?

Cozzi’s original plan was to buy the distribution rights to Gojira but Toho Studios turned him down.  They did, however, agree to allow Cozzi to distribute the American cut of Gojira, Godzilla, King of the Monsters.  (That’s the version where Raymond Burr appears as American reporter Steve Martin and, through some clever editing tricks, appears to be interacting with the characters from the original Japanese version.)

Cozzi immediately ran into two huge problems when it came to distributing Godzilla, King of the Monsters.  First off, the film was in black-and-white and most Italian theater owners refused to show black-and-white films.  Cozzi’s solution was to “colorize” the film by putting translucent gel over the frame, resulting in random splotches of color that gave the entire film what could generously be called a radioactive glow.  Secondly, the American cut was considered to be too short for theatrical distribution.  Cozzi proceeded to re-cut the re-cut, adding in scenes of actual war footage and clips from other 50s monster movies.  As a result Cozzi’s film opens not with Tokyo on fire but instead stock footage of Hiroshima before the bomb was dropped.  Later, footage of actual victims of the bomb would he used as footage of victims of Godzilla.

Having re-cut the film, Cozzi then decided that the movie could use a synthesizer-heavy soundtrack, which was provided by Vince Tempera, Fabio Frizzi, and Franco Bixio.

The end result …. well, the end result is a mess but it’s a mess that fascinating for fans of Godzilla.  The colorization creates an odd effect, in which the images are all familiar but still seem different, as if being viewed in a dream.  Often times, the splashes of color are so harsh and random that it makes it difficult to actually see what’s happening in the scene.  I had to look away a few times, due to the harshness brightness of some of the yellows.  There are a few times — and by that, I mean a very few times –when the color effects oddly work.  In those rare moments, Godzilla’s atomic nature seems to be radiating through the entire movie.

As for the “new footage,” it’s thoroughly tasteless to use actual footage from Hiroshima and Nagasaki but, at the same time, it also serves to remind the viewer of the national trauma that inspired the creation of Godzilla in the first place.  The footage reminds the viewer of the horrors of war while also leaving viewers wondering they really should be watching it used in the way that it’s used in this movie.  (For his part, Cozzi said he used actual war footage because modern audiences would expect more violence and destruction than was present in the original film.  It’s reasonable to assume that any subtext was purely accidental.)

Finally, the soundtrack …. actually, I like this version’s score.  It’s wonderfully ominous, especially at the start of the film.

Nicknamed Cozilla by Cozzi himself, 1977’s Godzilla is a bizarre experiment that doesn’t quite work but I would say it’s still one that should be seen by anyone who is interested in the history of either Godzilla or exploitation films in general.  (And make no mistake, this version of Godzilla is definitely an exploitation film.)  For years, the film was impossible to see outside of Italy.  Now, of course, you can find a copy on just about every torrent site.

Previous Godzilla Reviews:

  1. Godzilla, King of the Monsters (1958)
  2. Godzilla Raids Again (1958)
  3. King Kong vs Godzilla (1962)
  4. Mothra vs. Godzilla (1964)
  5. Ghidorah: The Three-Headed Monster (1964)
  6. Invasion of the Astro-Monster (1965)
  7. Godzilla vs. The Sea Monster (1966)
  8. Son of Godzilla (1967)
  9. Destroy All Monsters (1968)
  10. All Monsters Attack (1969)
  11. Godzilla vs Hedorah (1971)
  12. Godzilla vs Gigan (1972)
  13. Godzilla vs Megalon (1973)
  14. Godzilla vs Mechagodzilla (1974)
  15. The Terror of Mechagodzilla (1975)
  16. Godzilla vs. Mothra (1992)
  17. Godzilla vs. Destoroyah (1995)
  18. Godzilla, Mothra, and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack (2001)
  19. Godzilla (2014)
  20. Godzilla: Planet of the Monsters (2017)
  21. Godzilla, King of the Monsters (2019)
  22. Godzilla vs Kong (2021)
  23. Godzilla Minus One (2023)

Horror Film Review: Godzilla Raids Again (Dir by Motoyoshi Oda)


Godzilla Raids Again begins with a plane making an emergency landing on an island near Japan.  Soon, another plane lands to help out the first plane.  The two pilots, however, are immediately stunned by the sight of Godzilla battling an armored dinosaur with a spikey back.  Rushing back to the Japan, the pilots learn that the armored dinosaur was an Ankylosaurus that has been named Anguirus.  Anguirus and Godzilla are among the many prehistoric creatures who, having once been thought extinct, have been awakened and set free by nuclear testing.  And though Godzilla and Angurius are first spotted fighting on an isolate island, there’s little doubt that they will soon make their way to Japan, where the population is still recovering from the previous Godzilla attack.

First released in Japan in 1955 and subsequently released in the United States in 1959, Godzilla Raids Again was the first sequel to Gojira and, in a nod to continuity that would become extremely rare as the series continued, it actually does provide an explanation as to how exactly Godzilla is still alive after being apparently dissolved at the end of the first film.  It’s explained that there are actually several Godzillas.  The one that previously attacked Tokyo was destroyed but now a second one is coming.  Unfortunately, the man who destroyed the first Godzilla was killed in the process and apparently, he didn’t leave behind any notes explaining how he did what he did.

Once again, Japan is attacked by a giant monster.  Once again, cites are in flames and innocent people are dying.  The main difference is that, this time, Godzilla isn’t so much trying to destroy humanity as he just doesn’t even seem to realize that humanity is there.  Godzilla is more concerned with fighting Angurius and he barely seems to notice the buildings that he’s destroying and the lives that he’s ending.  If the first Godzilla film was about the lingering trauma of the nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Godzilla Raids Again is about being a small country caught in the middle of a conflict between two nuclear superpowers.  Godzilla and Angurius are so obsessed with beating each other that they really don’t care about anyone who gets trampled underfoot.  While Godzilla Raids Again is nowhere near as dark as the nightmarish first film, it’s still considerably more sober-minded than the Godzilla films that would immediately follow.  Godzillla Raids Again may not be as powerful a film as the first one but it still has its moments.  The film is at its best when it examines how ordinary citizens react to being pawns in the middle of a war between two super-powered monsters.  Some people defy the orders to stay home and instead try to have a good time in what may be their final moments.  Others cower in fear.  Some turn to religion.  Some turn to science.  A group of criminals try to bust out of prison.  In the end, it’s the brave citizens who are willing to risk and sacrifice their lives who ultimately save the world from Godzilla’s atomic fury.

When Godzilla Raids Again was released in the United States, it was in a heavily re-edited and poorly dubbed version.  (The narrator is sure to mention that the United States is willing to help out Japan with its monster problem.)  The film was retitled Gigantis and, throughout the Americanized version, Godzilla is referred to as being “Gigantis.”  Apparently, the film’s distributor thought that audiences would stay away if they knew that this film was a sequel, despite the fact that Godzilla had been a hit with American audiences.  Since Godzilla died at the end of the first film, the distributor felt that audiences would reject the idea of the character returning from the dead.  Times certainly have changed.

Of course, Godzilla is forever.

Previous Godzilla Reviews:

  1. Godzilla, King of the Monsters (1958)
  2. King Kong vs Godzilla (1962)
  3. Mothra vs. Godzilla (1964)
  4. Ghidorah: The Three-Headed Monster (1964)
  5. Invasion of the Astro-Monster (1965)
  6. Godzilla vs. The Sea Monster (1966)
  7. Son of Godzilla (1967)
  8. Destroy All Monsters (1968)
  9. All Monsters Attack (1969)
  10. Godzilla vs Hedorah (1971)
  11. Godzilla vs Gigan (1972)
  12. Godzilla vs Megalon (1973)
  13. Godzilla vs Mechagodzilla (1974)
  14. Godzilla vs. Mothra (1992)
  15. Godzilla vs. Destoroyah (1995)
  16. Godzilla, Mothra, and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack (2001)
  17. Godzilla (2014)
  18. Godzilla: Planet of the Monsters (2017)
  19. Godzilla, King of the Monsters (2019)
  20. Godzilla vs Kong (2021)
  21. Godzilla Minus One (2023)