“Hey, you guys! The 2010 remake of A Nightmare on Elm Street is on TV!”
“Alright! I NEVER MISS A ROONEY MARA HORROR MOVIE!”
Indeed, way back in 2010, there a lot of hype accompanying the release of the remake of A Nightmare on Elm Street. It came out at a time when a lot of classic horror films were being rebooted for no particular reason. Halloween got a reboot. Friday the 13th got a reboot. Texas Chainsaw Massacre has gotten a reboot. So, it was just kind of expected that Nightmare on Elm Street would get a reboot, bringing the story into the modern age and making the story less problematic and blah bah blah.
And yet, for all the hype that accompanied the Nightmare on Elm Street reboot, it was pretty quickly forgotten. If I remember correctly, it failed to live up to box office expectations and, as a result, there was never a sequel to this reboot. Jackie Earle Haley never got a second chance to play Freddy Krueger and, to be honest, that’s probably for the best. Haley’s a great actor who deserves better than to be typecast as the actor who played the second best version of Freddy Krueger. No matter how good a performance Haley could have given in any of the hypothetical sequels to the Nightmare reboot, he would have been overshadowed by Robert Englund’s definitive interpretation of the character.
Today, the movie seems to be best remembered as one of the films that Rooney Mara made before she was cast in the title role of David Fincher’s rehash of The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. Mara plays the role of Nancy, the sleep-deprived teenager whose friends are all having nightmares and dying in various grotesque ways. In Nightmare on Elm Street, Rooney Mara is even more boring than usual but then again, the same can be said of just about everyone else in the movie, with the exception of Jackie Earle Haley and Clancy Brown. The majority of the actors just go through the motions. It’s as if they decided that, since they were appearing in a horror movie, they didn’t really have to make any sort of effort to do anything interesting with their characters. One need only compare the performances of Heather Langenkamp and Rooney Mara to see why the original Nightmare On Elm Street remains a classic while the remake has been forgotten.
Of course, another reason why the reboot has been forgotten is because it’s not really that scary. The original Nightmare is still scary. The original can still give you nightmares. Robert Englund’s performance still holds up. The death of Tina is still terrifying. The scene where Nancy looks at the gray streak in her hair and says that she looks like she’s in her 20s is still funny. Nightmare on Elm Street still holds up. The reboot, however, falls flat in the scares department. I think part of the problem is that the dreams are too obvious in the reboot, In the original, the waking world would segue so effortlessly into the dream world that you were always kept off-balance. In the remake, the dreams are too easy to spot and they’re too dependent on CGI to be convincing as a actual nightmares.
The remake does do one interesting thing. There are several scenes in the film that seem to be designed to hint that maybe, in life, Freddy was actually innocent of the crimes for which was accused and that he was just set on fire because he was a convenient scapegoat. That’s an intriguing idea and it certainly would have brought a whole new dimension to Freddy and his quest for revenge. Just imagine how much of a mind-screw the film would have been if it had been revealed that Freddy had actually been framed by one of the same adults who later set him on fire. Unfortunately, after making you think that the movie might actually do something unexpected, the film then reveals that Freddy actually was guilty and the whole story becomes a bit less interesting. Revealing that Freddy was just a somewhat slow handyman who was wrongly accused would have brought some subversive life to this film but this reboot has no interest in being subversive.
Ignore the remake. Watch the original.