Welcome to Retro Television Reviews, a feature where we review some of our favorite and least favorite shows of the past! On Thursdays, I will be reviewing Decoy, which aired in Syndication in 1957 and 1958. The show can be viewed on Tubi!
This week, Casey is an accused man’s only advocate.
Episode 1.32 “Fiesta At Midnight”
(Dir by Michael Gordon, originally aired on May 19th, 1958)
Juan Ortega (Tomas Milian) comes to New York City from Puerto Rico and finds himself in jail, accused of robbery and assault. Ortega, who is still learning English, says that he was at a community dance when the crime happened and that there are two women who can provide him with an alibi. Unfortunately, one of them (Gloria Marlowe) is married and refuses to testify that she had been talking to another man. The other, a mysterious woman named Maria, cannot be found. Casey tries to help.
This was an okay episode. The episode calls out the NYPD for being too quick to assume that Ortega is guilty just because he speaks Spanish and he’s a newcomer to the neighborhood. That said, it bothered me that a translator was never provided for Ortega. Ortega was clearly not comfortable speaking English but he had to do so when talking to Casey because Casey didn’t know much Spanish. I get that this was probably all done to avoid having to ask the viewers to read subtitles but, in-universe, it felt strange. It was hard not to notice that, even in a precinct located in Spanish Harlem, there weren’t any Spanish cops.
This was an early role for Tomas Milian, who would go on to star in countless Spaghetti Westerns and who also played the corrupt general in Steven Soderbergh’s Traffic. Though there’s little of the cunning or wit that distinguished Milian’s later performances, he still makes Juan Ortega into a sympathetic figure.
As for the episode’s ending, Maria (Miriam Colon) is revealed to be a nun and she testifies that Juan was with her when the crime occurred. Casey tells us that Juan got his miracle.
You know that feeling when a thriller drags you so deep into its messiness that you forget to breathe? That’s The Chaser for most of its runtime, but it’s also a movie that stumbles as often as it sprints. Directed by Na Hong-jin in his feature debut back in 2008, this South Korean thriller doesn’t play by the usual rules. It’s not about a genius detective outsmarting a methodical killer. It’s about a washed-up, broke ex-cop turned pimp who stumbles into a serial murder case because one of his girls went missing and, frankly, he wants his money back. That blunt, ugly premise sets the tone for what follows: raw, desperate, and uncomfortably human. But being a first-time effort, The Chaser also shows its seams—clunky pacing in places, a few too many convenient coincidences, and an ending that tries for tragedy but sometimes feels more like the writer painted himself into a corner.
Let’s talk about our unlikely “hero,” Joong-ho, played with permanent five-o’clock shadow and simmering rage by Kim Yoon-seok. He’s not a good guy. He runs an escort service, slaps his girls around when they’re difficult, and only starts looking for one of them, Mi-jin, because her disappearance means lost profit. But here’s the tricky part Na Hong-jin pulls off: you still root for him. Joong-ho is tired, cynical, and beaten down by life, but underneath the scuzziness is a man who has seen too much corruption and feels a prick of responsibility when he realizes a customer might be a monster. The film doesn’t redeem him—he never turns into a noble saint—but it gives him a blunt, stubborn engine that feels real. That said, his character arc is more of a flat line. He doesn’t really change or learn anything by the end; he just gets more exhausted. For a debut, that’s a common shortcut—confusing intensity with development.
The killer, Young-min (Ha Jung-woo), is the opposite of what you’d expect. He’s not a lurking shadow or a theatrical psycho. He’s a soft-spoken guy with a pale, ordinary face who lives in a nondescript house. When Joong-ho first tracks him down through a phone number, Young-min calmly admits he took the girl, and then he calmly admits he probably killed her. The chilling part? He can’t remember the exact number of victims. He keeps a photo collection, but his memory is foggy from a brain injury. That detail is clever. It strips away the “mastermind” trope and leaves you with something more disturbing: a man who kills almost casually, like a bad habit he can’t quite recall. But the film never really explores why that brain injury matters beyond giving Young-min an occasional blank stare. As a debut flaw, it’s the kind of half-baked motivation that a more experienced director might have fleshed out or cut entirely.
What separates The Chaser from a typical cat-and-mouse thriller is how it weaponizes time and bad luck. The whole movie takes place over a day and a half, and every missed connection feels like a punch to the gut. At one point, Joong-ho drives right past the house where Mi-jin is still alive but bleeding out, because he’s following a different lead. Later, the police release Young-min on a technicality—lack of evidence—moments before Joong-ho finds crucial proof. You’ll scream at the screen. But here’s the thing: not all of these near-misses feel earned. Some of them rely on characters making decisions that are less “human error” and more “plot convenience.” For a debut director, balancing realism with momentum is tough, and Na Hong-jin sometimes tips too far into frustration for its own sake. The chase scenes aren’t slick; they’re clumsy and exhausting, which works in theory, but in practice, a couple of them drag on long enough that you start checking the runtime.
Then there’s Mi-jin (Seo Yeong-hie), the missing escort. For most thrillers, she’d be a corpse or a victim trophy. But The Chaser spends real time with her after she escapes Young-min’s basement—badly injured, confused, dragging herself through dark alleys. We see her call her young daughter. We see her haggle with a convenience store owner for a bandage. She’s not a plot device; she’s a tired single mom trying to survive. That’s genuinely good writing. However, the film also sidelines her for long stretches in the middle act, and when she reappears, the emotional payoff feels rushed. It’s a common debut problem: wanting to do justice to a supporting character but not yet knowing how to balance screen time across a whole cast.
Visually, the film is drenched in muted grays and wet streets. This isn’t the neon-lit Seoul of Oldboy or the slick gloss of I Saw the Devil. It’s rainy, cramped apartments, rundown police stations, and the kind of low-budget grit that makes everything feel lived-in and hopeless. That’s a strength. But the camerawork can get distractingly shaky, especially in dialogue scenes where no one is running. You can tell Na Hong-jin comes from a documentary background—sometimes it adds urgency, other times it feels like they forgot to set up a tripod. The sound design is nastier than the visuals: bones crack audibly, hammers thud on tile, and a child’s voice over a phone cuts through like glass. The score is barely there, which works until it doesn’t—some scenes feel a little too dry, a little too quiet, like the director was afraid of seeming manipulative.
What becomes increasingly difficult to ignore as The Chaser progresses is how the film’s portrayal of police incompetence drifts from pointed social critique into something closer to farce, yet without ever fully committing to satire. The detectives aren’t just flawed—they’re written as so hilariously useless that the movie flirts with dark comedy, but then pulls back. Are we supposed to laugh at the officer who falls asleep during a murder confession, or are we supposed to feel outraged? The tonal whiplash suggests Na Hong-jin wasn’t sure how far to push the absurdity, which is a common growing pain for a first-time director trying to balance genre beats with real-world cynicism. Also, the ending has become famous for its bleakness, but on a second watch, some of that bleakness feels forced. Without spoiling anything, the final fifteen minutes rely on a string of bad luck that would strain belief in a Final Destination movie. For a film that otherwise prides itself on gritty realism, that stretch feels like a debut director overcorrecting—trying too hard to avoid a happy ending and landing on something that’s more exhausting than meaningful.
If you compare The Chaser to Na Hong-jin’s later work, like The Yellow Sea or The Wailing, you can see the bones of a great filmmaker learning to control his impulses. Here, he throws everything at the wall: grueling chase scenes, social commentary about corrupt policing, a serial killer who isn’t a genius, a protagonist who isn’t a hero. Some of it sticks. Some of it slides off. The movie is too long by about fifteen minutes, and the middle section sags under the weight of repeated near-misses that start to feel less like tragedy and more like the director twisting the knife for the sake of it.
In the end, The Chaser is a good but uneven thriller. It’s not the masterpiece some fans claim, and it’s not a failure either. It’s a debut film with genuine energy, a couple of great performances, and a willingness to be ugly and uncomfortable. But it also has pacing issues, tonal confusion, and a third act that mistakes relentless misery for emotional depth. Watch it for Kim Yoon-seok’s grimy determination and Ha Jung-woo’s creepy blankness. Just don’t expect the polish of a veteran director. Na Hong-jin would get there later. Here, he’s still chasing his own potential.
It’s been fun living life as one of the biggest fans of Charles Bronson in the world going back to around 1984 or 1985 when I first watched DEATH WISH on late night TV with my dad. For most of those years, my positive obsession was just shared with my family and friends. That began to change in 2021 when I met a guy named Eric Todd who ran the Facebook page “This Week in Charles Bronson.” Not only did Eric run the page, but he also hosted a podcast of the same name. I guess through my sheer enthusiasm about finally meeting people who love Bronson like I do, Eric asked me to be part of his show. I can’t tell you how much fun I’ve had joining Eric and his various guests over the last 4 years on the podcast. During that time, I’ve been part of interviews with actors Jordan Rhodes and Robert F. Lyons, actress Jan Gan Boyd, author Paul Talbot, and even Charles Bronson’s niece Lindsay Ireland. Each interview has been special to me, and Lindsay shared with us that her cousin Paul (Bronson’s stepson) listened to the episode that she was on. I never imagined my love of Bronson would afford me the opportunity to meet these kinds of people, and that Charles Bronson’s own family would enjoy our stuff!
The fun continued this past week when Eric and I interviewed Native American author Sherman Alexie, who wrote the screenplay for the movie SMOKE SIGNALS, starring Adam Beach, Evan Adams, Irene Bedard, Gary Farmer, Tantoo Cardinal, and Tom Skerritt. Sherman loves Charles Bronson, and he told us that his dad even looked like Charles Bronson. We discussed some of his movie work, some of his short stories and novels, and the Bronson film THE WHITE BUFFALO (1977). We spend a lot of time discussing films in general, where Sherman introduced us to the movies REC (2007) and MEKKO (2015). We even spend some time talking about the “awesome” James Woods and the “scary” David Morse, who have both worked with Charles Bronson! If you want to know why I put “quotations” on those words, you’ll have to check us out.
So, if any of this sounds fun to you, I’ve linked to the YouTube video below for your viewing pleasure! If you like it, go back and watch some of our other shows and even subscribe! Some of my personal favorite shows are when us Bronson fans just sit around and talk about one of his movies. You never know where the conversations might end up. Heck, some of my favorites are shows I’m not even on! I do apologize in advance for my accent. What do you expect from a guy from Toad Suck, Arkansas?
Yesterday, it was announced that George Eastman had passed away at the age of 83.
George Eastman was born Luigi Montefiori in Genoa, Italy. Montefiori began his career by appearing in Spaghetti westerns. The tall and often bearded Montefiori had the dangerous look that made him a natural for outlaw and henchmen roles. Like many Italian actors, he took an “Americanized” alias for his acting roles. He appeared in his share of American and British films (he appeared opposite Charlton Heston in Call of the Wild and played Goliath in King David) but his fans will always remember him best for the work that he did in his native Italy. Occasionally, he played a hero. He gave a particularly strong performance in — don’t laugh — Erotic Nights of the Living Dead. That said, Eastman will always be best remembered for his villians.
Klaus Wortmann is the one who will always give me nightmares. Eastman played Wortmann in Joe D’Amato’s infamous 1980 film, Antropophagus. Klaus Wortmann was a wealthy man who lived on a Greek island with his wife, daughter, and his sister. Unfortunately, when he and his family were shipwrecked, Klaus resorted to cannibalism to survive. As the movie begins, Klaus is back at his mansion and being sheltered by sister. He’s also become an obsessive cannibal. He’s surrendered his humanity. He can no longer speak and instead just growls. He attacks everyone that he sees and he does things to his victims that led to this film being banned in several countries. Also known as The Grim Reaper, Antropophagus is film that delights in showing people being ripped to pieces and George Eastman is right in the middle of it all.
And he’s absolutely terrifying.
In real life, George Eastman was a handsome man. That’s one of the things that made him such a fascinating villain in countless western and crime films. He was usually playing a total psycho but there was still something about him that made you want to get to know more about him. Klaus Wortmann, on the other hand, is a terrifying monster. Unwashed, bearded, hideously scarred, continually bathed in sweat, growling and howling as he chases his victims, Klaus is a nightmare come to life. Eastman throws himself into capturing every grimy detail of Wortmann’s twisted existence and he comes across as a creature who seems to have literally jumped out of the shadows of our greatest fears.
In many ways, Antropophagus is not a particularly good film. Not even the notoriously shameless Joe D’Amato appeared to think much of it. The story drags because there aren’t enough victims and therefore there’s a lot of travelogue padding, especially early on in the film. Along with Eastman, there are some recognizable people in the cast — Tisa Farrow, Zora Kerova, Serena Grandi (who would later co-star with Eastman in Delirium) — both most of them come across like they’d rather be anywhere but there. But when George Eastman is on-screen, the film become horrifying. No one — not the pregnant woman and her husband, not the innocent blind girl, not even the flakey card reader — is safe. By the end of the movie, Klaus is literally eating pieces of himself. It takes a talented actor to pull that off.
Hi, everyone! Tonight, on Mastodon, I will be hosting the #TubiThursday watch party! Join us for 1986’s Brotherhood of Justice!
You can find the movie on Tubi and you can join us on Mastodon at 9 pm central time! (That’s 10 pm for you folks on the East Coast.) We will be using #TubiThursday hashtag! See you then!
Many, many years ago, when I first heard this song on the soundtrack for Kill Bill Volume One, I immediately fell in love with it. I have to admit, as well, that when I first heard Santa Esmeralda’s version, I assumed that the cover had been recorded specifically for the Kill Bill soundtrack. Well, turns out I was not only wrong, I was way wrong. This cover version was actually recorded way back in 1977.
I also thought, before I started writing this post, that the song was originally performed by the Animals. Wrong again. The song was first written in 1964 by Bennie Benjamin, Gloria Caldwell, and Sol Marcus and it was originally performed by Nina Simone. Then, in 1965, the Animals did their famous cover. The Animals’ version of the song is the one that used to get stuck in my head when I was in high school because it used to play constantly at the Target where I would skip school.
But the Santa Esmeralda version is my favorite and it is today’s song of the day.
4 Shots From 4 Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!
John Wayne’s birthday is just a few days away! Here’s 4 shots from the Duke’s unforgettable career.
4 Shots From 4 Films
Stagecoach (1939, directed by John Ford)
Sands of Iwo Jima (1949, directed by Allan Dwan)
The Searchers (1956, directed by John Ford)
The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (1962, directed by John Ford)
Adam In Chains was the third single to be released from Billy Idol’s controversial Cyberpunk album. Billy Idol predicted the future with Cyberpunk, though no one appreciated it at the time. In interviews, Idol said he was inspired by the work of William Gibson while also admitting he had never read anything written by Gibson.
The video was directed by Julien Temple, who is best-known for his work with the Sex Pistols.