Review: Independence Day (dir. by Roland Emmerich)


“We will not go quietly into the night! We will not vanish without a fight! We’re going to live on! We’re going to survive! Today, we celebrate our Independence Day!” — President Whitmore

If you were around in the summer of 1996, you already know exactly where you were when you first saw the trailer for Independence Day. There was this massive shadow creeping over the moon, followed by that terrifying, booming sound effect, and then the White House just absolutely getting vaporized by a giant laser beam. It was a cultural moment. Director Roland Emmerich hadn’t really made his mark on Hollywood yet, but with this one movie, he essentially invented the modern summer blockbuster template of destroying famous global landmarks. Looking back at Independence Day almost three decades later, it is honestly wild how well this movie holds up, not as a piece of high art, but as a perfectly calibrated, ridiculously entertaining popcorn machine.

The premise is beautifully simple: massive alien spaceships suddenly appear over Earth’s major cities, they don’t come in peace, and humanity has to figure out how to fight back before we go the way of the dinosaurs. What makes the first act of the movie so effective is the slow build. Emmerich doesn’t just start with explosions; he lets the dread simmer. We see the massive ship hover over New York City, casting a shadow that blocks out the sun, and the sheer scale of the thing is awe-inspiring. Then, when the ships finally initiate their attack sequence, the payoff is spectacular. The practical effects combined with early CGI create these massive, rolling walls of fire that tear through iconic buildings. It is destructive poetry, and as a kid watching it, it was the most incredible thing I had ever seen. Even now, the destruction feels heavy and tactile in a way that modern, entirely computer-generated action sequences often don’t.

But a movie is only as good as its characters, and Independence Day has arguably one of the greatest ensemble casts of the 1990s. You have Will Smith playing Captain Steven Hiller, a fighter pilot who is desperately trying to get promoted while also dealing with his girlfriend, her son, and their dog. Smith is at the absolute peak of his early movie star charm here, delivering some of the most quotable one-liners in action movie history. Punching an alien in the face and yelling “Welcome to Earth!” is the kind of ridiculous machismo that only Smith could pull off without making you cringe. Then you have Jeff Goldblum as David Levinson, an MIT-educated cable repairman and environmentalist who figures out the alien signal is a countdown. Goldblum is basically doing his classic Goldblum thing—stuttering, eccentric, highly caffeinated—but it works perfectly because he serves as the perfect foil to Smith’s brute physicality.

The supporting cast is so deep that it feels like an Ocean’s Eleven of sci-fi tropes. Bill Pullman plays President Thomas J. Whitmore, and he gives the role an earnestness that elevates the material. He’s not an action hero; he’s a former fighter pilot who is clearly in over his head but steps up when his people need him most. You also have Judd Hirsch as Goldblum’s cranky, kvetching father, providing fantastic comic relief. Randy Quaid plays Russell Casse, a traumatized former pilot who was abducted by aliens years ago and is written off as a drunk by his small town, giving the movie an underdog storyline. And you can’t forget Brent Spiner as Dr. Okun, the wildly eccentric Area 51 scientist who gets way too excited about the alien biology. Every single one of these actors is fully committed to the bit, no matter how absurd the situation gets.

Now, if we are being completely honest, we have to talk about the plot, which is essentially held together with scotch tape and sheer willpower. The entire third act revolves around Goldblum and Smith flying a captured alien spacecraft up to the mothership to upload a computer virus using a 1996 Apple PowerBook. Yes, an Earth laptop somehow interfaces perfectly with an advanced extraterrestrial operating system, and yes, the aliens apparently don’t have McAfee, Norton or any kind of firewall to prevent a rudimentary human virus from crippling their entire defense grid. It is monumentally stupid if you think about it for even five seconds. But the secret to Independence Day is that it moves so fast and has so much momentum that you simply do not have time to care. The movie dares you to roll your eyes, but then it immediately distracts you with another massive explosion or a great quip from Will Smith, and you just go along for the ride.

The climax of the movie is a masterclass in cheesy, triumphant blockbuster filmmaking. Before the final aerial assault on the alien ships, President Whitmore gives a speech to the troops that has become completely ingrained in pop culture. “Today we celebrate our Independence Day!” he yells, and it is so incredibly corny, but I challenge you not to get at least a little bit pumped up when the music swells. The dogfight that follows is chaotic and thrilling, culminating in Randy Quaid’s character making the ultimate sacrifice by flying his jet directly into the alien weapon. It is exactly the kind of melodramatic, heroic moment that Emmerich excels at, and it hits the emotional beats it needs to hit, even if you saw it coming from a mile away.

You also have to appreciate how unapologetically intense the movie feels despite skating by with a PG-13 rating. People get vaporized, cities are leveled, and there is a genuine sense of apocalyptic dread that permeates the middle of the film. When the aliens first attack, Emmerich actually takes the time to show the aftermath, including cars blowing up in tunnels and people desperately trying to outrun the fireballs. Harvey Fierstein’s character dramatically dying while just sitting in his car, rolling up the window as if that’s going to stop a giant wall of alien fire, is a weirdly specific, dark comedy beat that you rarely see nowadays. The movie has real stakes, and you genuinely feel like humanity is on the brink of extinction.

It is crazy to think about the legacy of Independence Day and how it changed Hollywood. Before this, disaster movies were mostly relegated to B-movie status or Irwin Allen productions from the 1970s. Emmerich proved that you could blend disaster spectacle with sci-fi action and make an absolute fortune. This movie paved the way for Armageddon, Godzilla, The Day After Tomorrow, and essentially the entire concept of the modern cinematic destruction porn genre. They did eventually make a sequel, Independence Day: Resurgence, in 2016, but it completely missed the point of the original. It was too slick, too reliant on weightless CGI, and it lacked the ragtag, underdog charm that made the first one so special.

At the end of the day, Independence Day is just pure, unadulterated cinema comfort food. It does not demand anything from you as a viewer other than to sit back, suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the fireworks. It captures a very specific mid-90s vibe where movies could be big, dumb, loud, and incredibly fun without taking themselves too seriously. Roland Emmerich has directed a lot of movies since then where he has destroyed the world in various different ways, but he has never quite managed to capture the lightning in a bottle that he did here. Whenever the Fourth of July rolls around, or whenever you just need a reliable, edge-of-your-seat action movie to kill a couple of hours, Independence Day is always there, waiting to welcome you to Earth one more time.

Lifetime Film Review: Danger on Party Island (dir by Danny J. Boyle)


My best friend Evelyn and I have a long-standing pact.  If either one of us dies mysteriously or suddenly disappears, the surviving friend will investigate the crime and bring those responsible to justice.

It’s the type of pact that you make when you realize how much your best friend actually means to you.  Fortunately, I’ve never had to keep up my end of the pact because nothing has happened to my best friend.  The truth of the matter is that it seems like it would actually be very difficult to independently solve a crime.  I know that a lot of people thought that Michelle McNamara did that when she investigated the Golden State Killer but, if you actually read I’ll Be Gone In The Dark and then research the actual facts of the case, you can’t help but notice that all of McNamara’s theories were wrong.  It’s not easy investigating a crime without a crime lab or a search warrant or the power to arrest people.  There’s a reason why most crimes are solved by detectives and not by well-meaning civilians.  Add to that, with my ADHD, there’s no way I’d be able to keep track of whatever clues I did find.  Seriously, I fear that I would be useless in that situation.

If only life were a Lifetime movie!

In 2o24’s Danger of Party Island, Mel Dale (Lindsey Dresbach) is a lawyer who is stunned to learn that her carefree sister, Georgia (Andrea Prevatt), has apparently washed up dead on the island of Fang Key.  While her anxious mother waits for word in the States, Mel heads down to Fang Key and tries to figure what could have led to her sister’s death.  The local police suggests that Georgia was on drugs and trying to cliff dive.  Mel says that Georgia never drank or used drugs.  (Why would you go to a “party island” if you didn’t drink or use drugs?)  The police say that Mel should just go home and let them handle it.  Mel says that she has to discover the truth.  The police mention that Georgia’s best friend is missing too.  Around this time, Mel finally figures out that the police aren’t going to be much help.

Mel’s investigation leads her to darkest corners of a party island.  She befriends hunky club owner Jever (James Bobo), despite everyone telling her that Jever is actually bad news.  She comes to suspect that Georgia might not even be dead.  This suspicion seems to be confirmed when Georgia suddenly starts posting cheerful videos to her social media accounts.  Again, everyone tells Mel that she should just go home but Mel is convinced that someone is holding Georgia against her will.  Meanwhile, Mel and Georgia’s mother keeps threatening to come to the island and take over the investigation herself.

The cool thing about Danger on Party Island is that all Mel really needs to launch an investigation is a lap top and a good search engine.  That certainly gave me some hope because, if I ever do have to solve a crime, I know all of the best search engines.  The other good thing about Danger on Party Island is that the island was really pretty.  This was a film where the plot was so-so but the scenery was lovely. Director Danny J. Boyle did a good job of contrasting the beauty of the island with the darkness of some of the things going in the shadows.

I just wish that the film had been a little bit more fun.  This is a film that did indeed embrace the melodrama but I still found myself wishing that it had embraced it even more.  Instead, the film’s big finale felt anti-climatic and things just never got as over-the-top as they should have.  Danger On Party Island had a beautiful island but it still needed to be more of a party.

In the end, this Lifetime film held my attention.  It didn’t quite live up to the melodramatic promise of its name but at least it suggested that solving a crime isn’t as hard as it looks.

I can only hope!

The Texas Rangers Set A World Record!


Today is not only America’s 250th birthday!  It’s also the day that the Texas Rangers set a world record by pouring the world’s largest glass of beer at Globe Life Field in Arlington!  Behold 600 gallons of Budweiser in one very big glass!

They started pouring at noon and finished at 1:45 in the afternoon!  The previous record was 545 gallons and it was held by the UK.  By pouring 600 gallons, the Rangers brought the record home to America!

Congratulations, Rangers!

The Action-Packed Covers Of Star Western


Star Western was one of the more popular western magazines of the pulp era.  Each issue promised 160 pages of shoot ’em up excitement.  The majority of the covers had a red background, which undoubtedly distinguished Star Western from all of the other western magazines of the 30s and 40s.

Here is small sampling of the action-packed covers of Star Western!

by Tom Lovell

by Richard Lillis

by Richard Lillis

by Walter Baumhofer

by William Soare

by Sam Cherry

by Norman Saunders

by Norman Saunders

by Norman Saunders

by Norman Saunders

An Encore Presentation Of A Video Game Mission I Love: “Fireworks” From The Godfather


This is an encore post for me because I shared this last year too.  In case you missed it back in 2025, this my favorite mission from the much maligned 2006 Godfather video game.  It’s also one of the few video game missions to make good use of the 4th of July holiday.

In this mission, Aldo (who is controlled by the player) takes care of a corrupt cop on the 4th of July.  The Godfather game is hardly perfect but I have always loved that cut-scene of the fireworks going off while Aldo and Rosa look down at the alley.

Happy Independence Day, everyone!

April Morning (1988, directed by Delbert Mann)


Adam Cooper (Chad Lowe) is a teenager growing up in Colonial Massachusetts.  His father, Moses Cooper (Tommy Lee Jones), is a stern man who believes that rights come from men and not God and who, despite believing in negotiating instead of fighting, is willing to take arms against the British if necessary.  Adam has a pretty girlfriend (Meredith Salenger) and tries to please both his religious mother (Susan Blakely) and his agnostic father.  When Paul Revere makes his famous ride, both Adam and Moses are thrust into the Battle of Lexington and, over the course of one long night, Adam is forced to grow up and become the man of the house.

Based on the classic novel by Howard Fast, April Morning was made for television and first aired in 1988.  The novel and the movie provide a look at the American Revolution through the eyes of the people who actually fought in the battles.  The movie emphasizes the coming-of-age aspect of Fast’s novel and downplays the political subtext.  The novel presented a much more complex view of both war and religion while the film definitely simplifies things.  Chad Lowe comes across as being too contemporary to be totally believable as someone growing up in the 1700s but Tommy Lee Jones is the perfect choice for Moses Cooper and, even though her role is small, Meredith Salenger once again demonstrates that she was one of the best young actresses of the era.  In the film, Rip Torn plays the man who fires the first shot of the battle and it’s hard to think of a better actor for the role.

At its best, the movie recreates the confusion of being in battle.  Even though the Battle of Lexington was the start of the American Revolution and April 19th, 1776 was one of the most important dates in American history, Adam Cooper just wants to survive the night so that he can return home.  War may sometimes be necessary but it’s never easy.

 

American Images, Part Six


by Erin Nicole

Happy Independence Day!  Below are a few pictures that I’ve taken over the years since this site began.

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

by Erin Nicole

 

The Adventures of a History Nerd: Candidates ’72


1972!  Now, that’s a presidential election that I’m sorry I wasn’t around to witness!

1972, of course, was the year that the Democrats nominated George McGovern and President Richard Nixon went on to win 49 states.  McGovern was considered to be one of the most left-wing presidential candidates of all time.  He started out as a dark horse but ultimately won the Democratic nomination after the more moderate Edmund Muskie’s campaign turned to be not as strong as people assumed and after Governor George Wallace’s campaign was ended by gunfire in Maryland.  (Wallace survived being shot but spent the rest of his life in wheelchair.)  McGovern’s campaign knew how to win a primary but had no idea how to win a general election.  He ended up getting around 37% of the popular vote.  He carried Massachusetts but he lost his home state of South Dakota.

Today, it’s usually assumed that Nixon’s victory was a foregone conclusion but that’s not true.  The Republicans had a weak midterm in 1970.  The Vietnam War was unpopular.  Nixon, himself, had managed to upset both the conservative and the liberal wings of the Republican Party with some of his policies.  Much as in 2020, a record number of candidates threw their hat into the ring to take on the incumbent President.  1972 is a great “What if” election.  What if the Democrats had nominated Edmund Muskie or Hubert Humphrey?  What if the Watergate burglars hadn’t been arrested?  What if George McGovern hadn’t picked Thomas Eagleton for Vice President or later asked him to step down as his running mate?  Would history be different today?

That’s why I’m glad that I have a copy of Candidates ’72.

Candidates ’72 was published, in 1971, by Congressional Quarterly.  It featured profiles of the many men and women who ended up running for President in 1972.  It not only detailed their backgrounds and their political stances but it also analyzed their chances of winning their party’s nomination.  For a history nerd like me, this book is wonderful because it was written without the benefit of hindsight.  It’s a chance to see what people were actually saying about the election of 1972 while it was going on.  Often times, it’s quite different from the biased analysis that was written about the election after it had already happened.

The other reason why I like Candidates ’72 is because so many memorable people ran for the Presidency in that year.  George McGovern, New York Mayor John Lindsay, U.S. Rep. Shirley Chisholm, Hubert Humphrey, Eugene McCarthy, Los Angles Mayor “Mad Sam” Yorty, George Wallace, Dr. Benjamin Spock, they are just some of the candidates profiled here.  Reading the profiles really does reveal that America was at a crossroads in the early 70s.  Much like today, a lot of people assumed that radicalism was ascendant while failing to consider just how serious the backlash would eventually become.  Some of the other Democrats running actually made George McGovern look like a moderate.  Meanwhile, on the Republican side, Nixon was challenged by an anti-war congressman named Pete McCloskey.  McCloskey eventually lost his house seat in the 80s but briefly reemerged in 2006 as an environmentalist and anti-war activist.  He was also a Holocaust denier so let’s be happy that he never got anywhere near the White House.

(It’s probably a sign of just how chaotic the 1972 election was that a few candidates — John Ashbrook, Terry Sanford — did not get profiled in Candidates ’72, presumably because they jumped into the fray after the book went to the presses.)

Here are the candidates and potential candidates who are profiled in Candidates ’72.

Republicans:

  1. Vice President Spiro Agnew of Maryland (elected Vice President in the General Election)
  2. Treasury Secretary John Connally of Texas (declined to run)
  3. Lobbyist John Gardner (declined to run)
  4. U.S. Rep. Pete McCloskey of California (suspended campaign during the primaries)
  5. President Richard M. Nixon of California (won the general election)

Democrats:

  1. U.S. Rep. William Anderson of Tennessee (dropped out before the primaries)
  2. Sen. Birch Bayh of Indiana (dropped out before the primaries)
  3. U.S. Rep. Shirley Chisholm of New York (defeated at the Democratic Convention)
  4. Former Attorney General Ramsey Clark of New York (declined to run)
  5. Sen. Fred Harris of Oklahoma (dropped out before the primaries)
  6. U.S. Sen. Vance Hartke of Indiana (withdrew during the primaries)
  7. Sen. Howard Hughes of Iowa (dropped out before the primaries)
  8. Sen. Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota (defeated at the Democratic Convention)
  9. Sen. Henry Jackson of Washington (defeated at the Democratic Convention)
  10. U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts (declined to run)
  11. New York Mayor John V. Lindsay (withdrew during the primaries)
  12. Lt. Gov. Lester Maddox of Georgia (withdrew during the primaries)
  13. Fmr. Sen. Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota (withdrew during the primaries)
  14. Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota (defeated in the General Election)
  15. U.S. Rep. Wilbur Mills of Arkansas (withdrew during the primaries)
  16. U.S. Rep. Patsy T. Mink of Hawaii (withdrew during the primaries)
  17. U.S. Sen. Walter Mondale of Minnesota (declined to run)
  18. Sen. Edmund Muskie of Maine (suspended campaign during the primaries)
  19. Sen. William Proxmire of Wisconsin (dropped out before the primaries)
  20. R. Sargent Shriver of Maryland (nominated for vice president, lost the general election)
  21. Gov. George Wallace of Alabama (suspended campaign after being shot in Maryland)
  22. Los Angeles Mayor Sam Yorty (withdrew during the primaries)

Independents:

  1. Ralph Nader (declined to run)
  2. Dr. Benjamin Spock (lost the general election)

Ran, but not profiled:

  1. U.S. Rep. John Ashbrook (R-OH)
  2. U.S. Sen. Thomas Eagleton (D-MO, nominated for Vice President but stepped down from the ticket and was replaced by Sargent Shriver)
  3. State Rep. Sissy Farenthold (D-TX, ran for the Vice Presidency at the Democratic Convention)
  4. U.S. Rep. Walter Fauntroy (D-DC)
  5. U.S. Sen. Mike Gravel of Alaska (D-Alaska, run for the Vice Presidency at the Democratic Convention)
  6. U.S. Rep. Wayne Hays (D-OH)
  7. Former Governor Endicott Peabody (D-Massachusetts, ran in the nonbinding Vice Presidential primary)
  8. Former Governor Terry Sanford (D-NC)
  9. U.S. Rep. John G. Schmitz (R-CA, ran as the candidate of the American Party)
  10. Cleveland Mayor Carl Stokes (D-OH)

I ordered my copy of Candidates ’72 shortly after I ordered Candidates ’76.  Sadly, my copy of Candidates ’72 is not in the best condition and I doubt I’ll ever find another copy.  As a proud history nerd, though, I’m still happy to have it.

 

Icarus File No. 30: Here (dir by Robert Zemeckis)


I really wanted to like Here.

Released in 2024, Here is the type of movie that I usually would like.  It’s ambitious.  It’s experimental.  It’s about history and how certain patterns will always repeat themselves no matter what.  It features Tom Hanks and Paul Bettany, two of my favorite actors.  Also, unlike a lot of people, I haven’t turned on Robert Zemeckis.  For the most part, I usually enjoy his movies, including the more recent ones.  (Of course, when I say more recent, I’m thinking of The Walk, which came out eleven years ago.  But still….)

Here has an intriguing concept.  Over the course of 104 minutes, Here covers several thousand years of history.  The stationary camera focuses on a single plot of land, which goes from being an area dominated by dinosaurs to being the road outside of Colonial Governor William Franklin’s house during the American Revolution to eventually becoming the living room of a house that is occupied by several different families.  The story plays out in a nonlinear fashion with the marriage of Richard and Margaret Young (played by Tom Hanks and Robin Wright) ultimately dominating the narrative.  We watch as people fall in love, sometimes fall out of love, and eventually die.  With the exception of one key moment, the camera never moves.  Instead, we watch as life plays out in front of the camera and it’s often left to our imagination as to what’s happening on the other side of the lens.  When Margaret, at one point, complains about how she can’t stand to keep looking at the same couch day-after-day, we know exactly how she feels.

As I said, I really wanted to like this movie but, unfortunately, it just fell flat.  We meet a lot of characters but no one really feels human.  Instead, all of the dialogue and the action has the shallow snappiness of an old sitcom.  It’s easy to imagine this film being aired with a laugh track and an audience going, “Awwww!” after every emotional moment.  As a result, watching Here feels less like witnessing history unfold and more like flipping around the nostalgia channels and trying to pick which old sitcom you want to watch.  Do you want to watch the show about Ben Franklin not liking his son or the show that features Paul Bettany as a veteran dealing with PSTD?  Do you want a show about a pilot who dies during the Spanish Flu epidemic or about a masked-up husband during the COVID lockdowns?  One of the film’s final scenes features a character who is suffering from Alzheimer’s visiting the house and suddenly announcing that they remember everything about living there.  It’s a moment that is meant to be heartfelt but, instead, it feels insulting to anyone who has ever taken care of a loved one with dementia.  Alzheimer’s is never cutesy, regardless of what the movies may tell us.  In the end, very little of the film’s vision of humanity feels authentic.

The other big problem is that the film occasionally uses digital de-aging to try to convince us that Tom Hanks and Robin Wright are both teenagers and it just doesn’t work.  Hanks is playing Paul Bettany’s son but, whenever the two actors appear at the same time, it’s obvious that Hanks is considerably older than his screen father.  Unlike The Irishman, which had a strong story and enough good performances to convince the viewer to suspend their disbelief and accept the imperfect de-aging technology, the de-aging in Here just emphasizes how inauthentic the film’s story feels.

As I said earlier, this film had potential but, unfortunately, most of that potential goes unrealized.

And that really is a shame.

Previous Icarus Files:

  1. Cloud Atlas
  2. Maximum Overdrive
  3. Glass
  4. Captive State
  5. Mother!
  6. The Man Who Killed Don Quixote
  7. Last Days
  8. Plan 9 From Outer Space
  9. The Last Movie
  10. 88
  11. The Bonfire of the Vanities
  12. Birdemic
  13. Birdemic 2: The Resurrection 
  14. Last Exit To Brooklyn
  15. Glen or Glenda
  16. The Assassination of Trotsky
  17. Che!
  18. Brewster McCloud
  19. American Traitor: The Trial of Axis Sally
  20. Tough Guys Don’t Dance
  21. Reach Me
  22. Revolution
  23. The Last Tycoon
  24. Express to Terror 
  25. 1941
  26. The Teheran Incident
  27. Con Man
  28. Looker
  29. 1776

Film Review: The Patriot (dir by Roland Emmerich)


First released in the year 2000, The Patriot stars Mel Gibson (back before the arrests and scandals) as Benjamin Martin.

Benjamin Martin is a planter living in colonial-era South Carolina.  When he was younger, he fought in the French/Indian War and was infamous for his ferocity as a combatant.  However, in the year 1776, he is devoted to working the land and peacefully caring for his children.  When, as a member of the South Carolina General Assembly, he is called upon to cast a vote for or against independence, he abstains.  He’s no fan of the British but he’s also seen the harsh reality of war and doesn’t want his sons to have any part of it.  However, the Assembly still votes for Independence and Martin’s oldest son, Gabriel (Heath Ledger), is among the first to enlist in the army.

Four years later, the British come to the Martin farm and demand that Benjamin had over a wounded Gabriel to them.  When Benjamin resists, the arrogant Col. Tavington (Jason Isaacs) kills one of Benjamin’s other sons.  After Tavington has Gabriel arrested, Benjamin and two of his remaining sons track down the British convoy transporting him.  While his two youngest sons look on in horror, Benjamin savagely shoots and hacks to death all of the British soldiers and rescues Gabriel.

The Patriot may be a film about the American Revolution but it’s also definitely a Mel Gibson film.  That means that Benjamin is man driven as much be revenge as by a desire to win his country’s independence.  The British killed his son and burned down his house.  Benjamin responds by grabbing his musket and packing his axe and soon, it’s more common than not to see Benjamin covered in blood.  Benjamin attacks like a feral beast who is determined to dominate anyone and anything that would invade his territory.  Two of his sons go from being honored to be asked to come along to being terrified at the sight of their father murdering soldier after soldier.  It’s probably the most emotionally honest moment you’ll ever find in a Roland Emmerich film.  Of course, whether Emmerich meant for it to be so is open to debate.

And indeed, it should be noted that The Patriot is very much a Roland Emmerich film.  The running time is an epic 165 minutes.  The battle scenes are long and loud and carefully choreographed.  Gibson was still rugged and handsome when he played Benjamin Martin.  (Both before his downfall and after, Gibson has always been best cast as people who just want to be left alone and who finally snap once it becomes obvious that’s not going to happen.)  Heath Ledger almost appears beatific in his scenes.  The film looks great without ever quite looking authentic.  It’s like a fever dream that is less about how the American Revolution was actually fought and more about how we imagine it was fought.

And you know what?

The film works for me.  This is one of Emmerich’s best films, which admittedly is not a high bar to clear.  Yes, it’s a bit simplistic.  Yes, it’s not historically accurate.  Yes, all of the British are portrayed as being one-dimensional villains.  Who cares?  Whether he realizes it or not, Roland Emmerich has always been a B-movie maker at heart and The Patriot is effective in much the same way that many crude but shameless B-movies are.  The mix of Mel Gibson’s madness, Heath Ledger’s beatific earnestness, and Jason Isaac’s arrogance transforms The Patriot into a triumph of the pulp imagination.  Much like America itself, The Patriot is big and loud and it makes absolutely no apologies.