Horror on the Lens: Destroy All Planets (dir by Noriaki Yuasa)


Aliens are trying to conquer Earth.  It’s a pretty good thing that we’ve got a giant, fire-breathing turtle to protect us!

In Japan, this film was released as Gamera vs Viras.  In 1969, when it aired on American television, the Japanese actors were dubbed and the title was changed to Destroy All Planets, presumably to try to capitalize on the success of Destroy All Monsters.  As any true kaiju fan can tell you, Gamera and Godzilla exist in different cinematic universes but that’s not something that the average American was worried about, especially in 1969!  Myself, I love both Gamera and Godzilla.  That said, my favorite remains Jet Jaguar.  Whatever happened to that robot?

Here, for your viewing pleasure, is today’s Horror on the Lens!  Enjoy Destroy All Planets!

 

 

Horror Song of the Day: The Winner by Lance Owg, Gabriel Rohels, and David Cole


Today’s song of the day comes from the 1981 slasher classic, Graduation Day!

Just try not to sing along!

Everybody wants to be the winner….

Horror Scene That I Love: Charlton Heston And Woodstock In The Omega Man


Today would have been the 103rd birthday of actor Charlton Heston.

This scene that I love comes from one of the few horror films in which Heston appeared.  An adaptation of Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend, 1971’s The Omega Man featured Charlton Heston as Robert Neville.  By night, Neville protects his house against the mutant horde.  By day, he tracks those sleeping mutants down and watches Woodstock over and over again.

“They don’t make them like that anymore,” Neville says.

This scene gets a lot of attention because of the contrast between the conservative Heston and the hippies in the film.  To me, the reason that it works is because Woodstock is a documentary.  Neville isn’t watching an actor pretending to be a character in a film.  He’s watching an actual human being who went to the Woodstock music festival and who is presumably either now a mutant or dead.  Imagine being the hippie interviewed by this scene and seeing yourself in The Omega Man and knowing you didn’t survive the apocalypse.  For that matter, we also have to assume that all of the Woodstock performers have been turned into mutants as well.  Write a song about that, Country Joe.

(I choose to believe that Arlo Guthrie made it to safety.  Sha Na Na, though?  Doomed.)

Neville’s right.  They don’t make them like this anymore.

 

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special Anne Rice Edition


4 Or More Shots From 4 Or More Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

Today would have been the 86th birthday of author Anne Rice.  It’s time for….

4 Shots From 4 Anne Rice Adaptations

Interview With A Vampire (1994, dir by Neil Jordan, DP: Phillippe Rousselot)

Exit to Eden (1994, dir by Garry Marshall, DP: Theo van de Sande)

Queen of the Damned (2002, dir by Michael Rymer, DP: Ian Baker)

The Young Messiah (2016, dir by Cyrus Nowrasteh, DP: Joel Ransom)

 

Music Video of the Day: Bloodletting (The Vampire Song) by Concrete Blonde (1990, dir by ????)


I just know that someone’s going to be like, “Actually, Lisa, this is song isn’t about vampires, it’s about someone sucking the happiness out of life.”

Listen, I don’t care.  It’s October.  It’s horrorthon.  The lead singer of Concrete Blonde says that she was inspired to write the song by Interview with a Vampire, which is something that’s very obvious when you watch the video.  And today would have been Anne Rice’s birthday.  For our purposes,  it’s a vampire song.

Enjoy!

Horror Review: The Ritual (dir. by David Bruckner)


“Oh, this is awful in almost every conceivable way.” — Phil

David Bruckner’s The Ritual turns a seemingly straightforward hiking-trip nightmare into a bleak, character-driven story about grief, guilt, and the fear of being judged by the worst thing you have ever done. Released in 2017, the film takes the familiar setup of friends becoming lost during a hiking trip and turns it into something far more tense, emotionally bruised, and unsettling. It is part of the wave of folk horror that began emerging in the late 2000s, with filmmakers returning to remote landscapes, old belief systems, pagan imagery, and the frightening idea that modern people are badly unprepared for places ruled by ancient customs. The Ritual contains the expected genre material—an ominous Scandinavian forest, strange symbols, a decaying cabin, and an isolated community—but its real strength is how tightly those elements connect to its characters’ unresolved guilt and resentment.

The film follows Luke, played by Rafe Spall, who is still deeply traumatized by the death of his friend Rob. In the opening sequence, Luke and Rob enter a liquor store after a night out and become caught in the middle of a robbery. Luke hides while Rob is killed trying to resist the attackers. It is an immediately harsh and effective opening because the film does not treat Luke’s inaction as something simple or easy to judge. He is terrified, frozen, and unable to process the situation. Even so, he cannot forgive himself for surviving. That moment becomes the defining wound of his life, and everything that happens afterward pushes him back toward it.

Luke eventually joins Phil, Dom, and Hutch on a hiking trip through Sweden that is meant to honor Rob’s memory. It becomes clear early on that the group’s friendship is not as solid as it once was. They know each other well enough to trade jokes and insults, but there is a lot of buried frustration underneath the banter. When Dom injures his knee, he argues that they should take a shortcut through the forest rather than continue along the longer established trail. The decision makes sense on a practical level, but it puts them in a setting where the normal rules of direction, distance, and safety quickly stop applying. The trip that is supposed to help them mourn Rob instead becomes a pressure cooker for every unresolved issue they have with one another.

That tension is what makes the first half of The Ritual more interesting than a routine “people get lost in the woods” movie. The men are not written as interchangeable victims waiting for the plot to remove them one by one. They have the worn-down chemistry of friends who have known one another for years but may have outgrown the version of themselves that first brought them together. Luke is defensive and emotionally closed off. Dom can be abrasive, especially when pain and fear make him more volatile. Phil is cynical and exhausted. Hutch is the closest thing the group has to a stabilizing influence, but even he cannot keep the old resentments from surfacing.

Bruckner gives their arguments a messy, lived-in quality. They do not stop to explain their entire friendship history for the audience; instead, the viewer picks up on it through accusations, half-finished insults, and the way everyone reacts when Rob’s death comes up. Luke’s guilt is the most obvious source of conflict, but the others are carrying their own anger toward him as well. They cannot openly say what they think without admitting that they may blame him for what happened. As the hike becomes more dangerous, that tension becomes harder to contain. The film understands that fear makes people meaner, more selfish, and more honest than they want to be.

The Swedish wilderness is easily one of the movie’s greatest assets. Bruckner and cinematographer Andrew Shulkind make the forest feel huge and claustrophobic at the same time. The woods are not shot like a scenic tourist destination. They are wet, dark, muddy, and disorienting, filled with thin trees that block the characters’ view and make every direction seem identical. The lack of clear landmarks matters because it slowly strips the group of confidence. At first, they are annoyed hikers trying to save time. Before long, they are struggling to tell where they have been, where they are going, or whether the forest is allowing them to leave at all.

The film excels at building dread through details rather than relying on constant jolts. The friends discover unnerving signs scattered through the woods: an animal carcass hanging impossibly high in the trees, crude figures made from sticks, unfamiliar markings, and evidence that somebody—or something—has been watching them. One of the most memorable sequences takes place in an abandoned cabin that the group uses for shelter. Inside, they find a grotesque shrine and signs of an old ritualistic practice that seem completely out of place in the modern world. The scene is disturbing because of how wrong it feels. These men have not just stumbled into an empty house; they have crossed into a space defined by beliefs they do not understand.

That atmosphere is where The Ritual most clearly earns its place in modern folk horror. The movie is not simply interested in isolated woods as a convenient backdrop for scares. It treats the forest as a place with a history and a set of rules that exist independently of the characters. Luke, Dom, Phil, and Hutch arrive with backpacks, maps, phones, and ordinary personal problems, but those things become almost useless once the landscape begins to feel hostile. Their modern routines and assumptions do not protect them. The horror comes partly from the idea that they are outsiders who have entered a world where their explanations mean nothing.

The later sections introduce an isolated group whose beliefs are rooted in an older, more ritualized worldview. This element can feel more direct than the earlier ambiguity, but it still fits the movie’s larger themes. The people Luke encounters represent a twisted alternative to the kind of shame and grief that have been consuming him. Their world offers a warped version of survival: submit to fear, accept the rules, and give up the parts of yourself that make resistance possible. It is an ugly kind of community, one that turns spiritual tradition into coercion and treats personal suffering as something to be exploited.

Rafe Spall is the key to why the film works as more than an exercise in atmosphere. Luke is not an idealized horror protagonist. He is stubborn, defensive, and sometimes hard to like, particularly when he tries to avoid talking about Rob. But Spall makes his guilt feel immediate and human. Luke is not haunted just because he saw someone die; he is haunted because he believes that his failure in that moment reveals who he really is. The forest repeatedly forces him to confront that belief through hallucinatory transitions that blur the wilderness with the liquor-store robbery. Doors in the forest become entrances to the shop. The wooded darkness gives way to fluorescent aisles. Luke seems to be reliving the same failure from different angles, unable to escape the moment he most wishes he could change.

Those surreal flashbacks are some of Bruckner’s best directing choices. They are visually simple but highly effective, placing Luke’s internal guilt directly into the physical environment around him. The movie never turns into a vague psychological-horror story that dismisses everything as a dream, but it uses Luke’s trauma to make the supernatural setting feel more personal. The threat in the woods is frightening because it seems to recognize his weakness. It does not just want to harm him; it wants him to surrender to the version of himself that he already hates.

If The Ritual has a flaw, it is that the final act loses a little of the earlier section’s mystery once the film begins explaining more about what is happening in the forest. The strongest passages are often the quietest ones: the men arguing while lost, the unsettling evidence in the trees, the cabin sequence, and the growing suspicion that they are being pushed in a direction they cannot understand. Still, the conclusion works because it brings the movie back to Luke’s personal struggle. His escape is not simply about reaching safety. It is about refusing to let guilt define his identity forever.

By the end, The Ritual delivers a satisfying sense of catharsis without pretending that Luke has been completely healed. He survives an experience that forces him to face the fear he has been carrying since Rob’s death, but that does not erase the loss or make him a different person overnight. What changes is his willingness to stop living as though one terrible moment has permanently decided who he is. That emotional resolution gives the film more weight than many survival-horror stories.

Overall, The Ritual is a smart, atmospheric, and surprisingly character-driven horror film. Its strongest qualities are its oppressive forest setting, its believable group dynamics, its gradual escalation, and Rafe Spall’s deeply uncomfortable performance. Most importantly, it recognizes that folk horror becomes powerful when the ancient and supernatural elements expose something painfully human. Bruckner turns a memorial hike into a nightmare about guilt, masculinity, friendship, and the terror of being unable to outrun your own past.

October Positivity: In Gramps’ Shoes (dir by Chip Rossetti)


2013’s In Gramps’ Shoes opens with Ty (Donald James Parker) praying that his daughter, Amy (Francine Locke), will finally call him.  It’s been 20 years since they last spoke.  Amy felt that Ty — or “Gramps” as he’s eventually known — was too controlling when she was growing up.  He didn’t approve of her music.  He didn’t approve of the man she married.  When she left home, she went to Tennessee and promised herself that she would never look back.

However, Amy is now in some trouble.  Her husband has left her.  Her teenage son, Scott (Andrew Wilson Williams), is a slacker who smokes on the porch with his loser friends and who refuses to even consider getting a part-time job to help pay the bills.  Her daughter, Sally (Brittany Blades), is a bit more responsible but she’s been reading Harry Potter and that could lead to her becoming a witch.  Amy is also nearly broke.  She finally swallows her pride and calls Gramps to ask for help.

Soon, Gramps has moved down to Tennessee.  At first, Scott and his friends are dismissive of Gramps.  But then they watch as Gramps beats Scott in a two-mile race.  They watch as Gramps does pull-ups at a local park.  They all marvel at how athletic Gramps is.  Scott decides that he wants to run just like Gramps.  But first, Scott is going to have to work on his attitude and start going to church….

This film has a lot of problems, from the poor ADR to the bad acting to the script that allows certain scenes to drag on without end.  This film is nearly two hours long and you will definitely feel every one of those 115 minutes.  Even the running scenes are a bit disappointing because no one really looks like they’re in good enough condition to be a track star.  Everyone in the film talks about how good Gramps looks but Gramps actually spends the majority of the film looking like he might collapse at any moment.

The main problem with the film is Gramps is a kind of a jerk.  From the minute he shows up in Tennessee, he’s giving orders and we can tell why his daughter thought he was too controlling.  He moves in and immediately starts to tell Amy how to raise her son.  Because Gramps goes to church, he demands that his grandchildren come with him.  (Keep in mind, he doesn’t ask them to go to a church.  He tells them that they have to come to his church.)  He makes it clear that his grandchildren won’t be watching anything fantasy-related (like a Harry Potter movie) as long as he’s around.  Gramps isn’t just opinionated.  Instead, he comes across as being angry and rather aggressive.  And yet, everyone just loves to be around him.

In this film, Parker appears to be playing the same character that he played in Gramps Goes To College.  However, there’s a plot development that makes it impossible for this to be a prequel to Gamps Goes To College.  At the same time, Gramps first gets his nickname in this film which means that Gramps Goes To College also couldn’t be considered a sequel.  It’s not the film’s biggest problem but it is something that bothers a continuity nerd like me.

Despite all of those problems, this film does end with a priceless final line.  Is Scott going to go prom with his new girlfriend?  Actually, Scott might “lead a protest against Harry Potter …. because it’s what Gramps would have wanted.”  The film is almost worth watching just to hear that one line.

Almost.

Late Night Retro Television Review: Saved By The Bell 3.8 “Fake IDs”


Welcome to Late Night Retro Television Reviews, a feature where we review some of our favorite and least favorite shows of the past!  On Saturdays, I will be reviewing Saved By The Bell, which ran on NBC from 1989 to 1993.  The entire show is currently streaming on Tubi!

This week, someone gets caught cheating!

Episode 3.8 “Fake IDs”

(Dir by Don Barnhart, originally aired on October 19th, 1991)

Having finally reached the point where he’s ready to move on from Kelly, Zack Morris resorts to lying to get a new girlfriend. He tells USC freshman Danielle (Julie St. Claire) that he’s a fellow Trojan. He claims to be a photojournalism major who spends all of his time in his darkroom. That’s why she never sees him on campus. Wink wink.

When Danielle invites him to the Attic, an 18-and-up club, Zack instructs Screech to use the skills he’s learned in photography class to make fake IDs. Zack, Slater, and Screech sneak out of Zack’s house and hit the Attic. Screech gets chased by an older woman named Reggie. Slater spends the whole night talking about how much he misses Jessie. Zack dances with Danielle. It’s a great night until they spot Kelly’s new boyfriend, Jeff, dancing with a girl who isn’t Kelly.

“Whoa!” Zack, Slater, and Screech all say at the same time.

When Jessie and Lisa hear that the guys went to an over-18 club, they decide they want fake IDs as well. Meanwhile, when Zack tells Kelly about seeing Jeff, Kelly accuses Zack of being jealous. But when Jeff gives a half-hearted excuse for why he can’t go out with her that night, Kelly asks Screech to make her a fake ID as well.

The next night, Zack’s parents are at a Peter, Paul and Mary concert. Zack goes to the Attic with Slater, Screech, Lisa, and Jessie and is shocked when he can’t find Danielle. What Zack doesn’t know is that Danielle called the house to tell him she would be arriving late, and the phone was answered by Mrs. Morris (Melody Rogers). Mrs. Morris stops singing “Puff the Magic Dragon” just long enough to ask, “What’s the Attic?”

At the Attic, Kelly arrives just in time to spot Jeff dancing with his other girlfriend. She yells, “I broke up with a great guy for you!” “It’s not like we’re going steady,” Jeff replies. “We’re through!” Kelly says, and I can only assume that Kelly is also going to quit the job she so desperately needed just a few episodes ago.

Kelly, Jessie, and Lisa go off together so that Kelly can spend a few minutes “yelling in the ladies’ room.” Danielle and Mrs. Morris show up at the same time. Zack introduces his mom as his “young-looking older sister.” Mrs. Morris orders Zack, Slater, and Screech out to the car. They leave, and we’re left to wonder how Kelly, Jessie, and Lisa are going to get home.

To be honest, I kind of hate this episode. Jeff cheating on Kelly comes out of nowhere, and it’s totally against everything we’ve already learned about the character. Previously, the whole point of Jeff’s character was that he was a nice guy who didn’t intentionally set out to break up Zack and Kelly. In this episode, he’s suddenly a jerk.

That said, there are actually a few funny moments to be found, like Lisa trying to shove Zack away while he’s looking for Danielle. Slater’s loyalty to Jessie was actually pretty sweet, and even Screech was a bit less annoying than usual. It’s a well-done episode, even if it only exists to reset the Kelly/Zack relationship.

I just hope Kelly, Jessie, and Lisa were able to find a way home.

Made-For-TV-Movie Review: The Execution of Gary Glitter (dir by Rob Coldstream)


Made for British television, 2009’s The Execution of Gary Glitter opens with disgraced former rock star Gary Glitter (played by Scottish actor Hilton McRae) returning to the UK after serving a three-year prison sentence in Vietnam. When he was younger, Glitter was one of the most popular men in the UK, a rock star who was liked by both parents and — ahem — their children. His song “Rock and Roll Part 2,” with its chorus of “Hey!”, became a mainstay at sporting events. However, everything fell apart in the late ’90s when he was arrested and subsequently convicted of possessing child porn. After he was released from prison, Glitter went abroad and swore he would never return to Britain. In 2005, while living in Vietnam, he was convicted of having sex with underage girls. While he could have faced the firing squad as a result, he was instead given a three-year prison sentence. When he was released, he attempted to relocate to Hong Kong and Taiwan, only to be told that he was not welcome. Eventually, he had no choice but to return to the UK because every other country banned him from entering.

That’s all a matter of public record. The Execution of Gary Glitter imagines what would have happened if Glitter — or Paul Gadd, to use his real name — returned to a UK that had recently reinstated the death penalty. In this film, as soon as Gadd arrives in the UK, he’s placed under arrest. He’s been out of the country for so long that he totally missed the fact that Britain is once again hanging people. He’s also surprised to hear that he can be tried for crimes that were committed outside of British territory and that he can be executed if found guilty of the same crimes for which he was convicted in Vietnam.

The Execution of Gary Glitter is a mix of dramatic scenes and mockumentary-style interviews with people who were involved in Glitter’s criminal case. Though Gary Glitter is played by Hilton McRae, a few British journalists and politicians appear as themselves and talk about their feelings concerning the reinstatement of the death penalty. British MP Ann Widdecombe appears and makes the case for bringing back hanging. (Seventeen years after this special aired, Widdecombe would be brutally murdered in her own home, a victim of the political violence we’re always told isn’t actually occurring.) The film ends with a title card saying that, in 2009, polling showed that 53% of Britons supported bringing back capital punishment. It’s interesting how people always want the opposite of whatever it is they have. In America, the anti-death penalty movement is having a moment, but I can guarantee that, if capital punishment ever was outlawed here, you’d have people demanding that it be brought back within a month.

As for this film, it’s weird. Making a film like this about an actual person is weird. I honestly can’t tell you whether this film is for or against the death penalty. On the one hand, the scenes featuring the hangman and the gallows are rather cold and disturbing. The cold mercilessness of hanging is emphasized and with it, the idea that people who support the death penalty run the risk of becoming just as cold.  (Of course, considering what’s currently happening in Tennessee as a result of the botched lethal injection of Christa Pike, some viewers would today undoubtedly appreciate the cool precision of a hanging.) On the other hand, Gary Glitter is about as unsympathetic a character as you can imagine and, in the film, he’s portrayed as being someone who lacks the self-awareness to understand why people are even upset at him. He makes plenty of excuses but they all ring hollow. At one point, the film mentions that Europe is uniformly condemning and sanctioning the UK for bringing back the death penalty. That would probably be a big deal in the UK. In America, we really don’t care what Europe thinks. Annoying Brussels is our national pastime.

What the film definitely does get right is the carnival atmosphere that would accompany the execution of a celebrity. The film imagines people selling T-shirts outside of the prison, macabre remixes of Glitter’s song playing on the radio, and Glitter himself receiving letters from people who continue to be fans despite the crimes for which he’s been convicted. Hilton McRae does a good job in the lead role. He starts out as arrogant and cocky and then gradually, as the reality of his situation dawns on him, he grows more and more desperate.

As for the real-life Gary Glitter, he was not amused by this film and tried to keep it from airing. Six years after the film aired, he was arrested and convicted of several more sex crimes that came to light as a result of the inquest into Jimmy Savile’s crimes. He was sentenced to a 16-year prison term. Just this year, the still-incarcerated Glitter was charged in a new set of historic sex crimes. He has pled not guilty.