Penthouse | Through the Shattered Lens

Oh, Wicked Wanda!—later shortened to Wicked Wanda—was Penthouse’s bold, lavish, and often deranged answer to Playboy’s Little Annie Fanny: an adult comic strip that met its competitor’s sexual satire with more cruelty, more eccentricity, more political bite, and startlingly beautiful painted art. Running as a full-color comic from 1973 to 1980, it paired novelist and journalist Frederic Mullally’s caustic scripts with Ron Embleton’s rich watercolor imagery, transforming a prior prose feature into one of the strangest recurring fixtures in 1970s men’s magazines.

Bob Guccione’s reaction to Playboy’s Little Annie Fanny was not merely to imitate it. He wanted Penthouse to have an equivalent feature—and, characteristically, something he considered superior. Playboy’s strip had been a signature showcase for Harvey Kurtzman and Will Elder: a highly polished, densely gagged satire built around the sexually guileless Annie, who repeatedly stumbled into an absurd succession of social fads, political caricatures, pop-cultural parodies, and erotic situations. Guccione saw the commercial and cultural value in such a feature and commissioned Mullally to develop Penthouse’s alternative, ultimately bringing in Embleton, an accomplished British comics artist and painter, to give the strip an unusually lush visual identity.

The crucial difference lies in what each strip thinks its heroine represents. Little Annie Fanny is fundamentally a comic of naïveté. Annie is constantly exploited, ogled, misled, commodified, or swept along by the lunacy of a world more foolish than she is. Kurtzman and Elder’s satire is crowded, busy, and democratic in its ridicule: everyone from hypocrites to celebrities to institutions becomes part of the page’s manic visual clutter. Wicked Wanda, by contrast, has no innocence at its center. Wanda Von Kreesus is a fabulously wealthy, sexually assertive, openly malicious heiress who does not drift helplessly through corruption; she thrives within it. She does not discover the depravity of society. She engineers it, enjoys it, or conquers it.

That shift makes Wicked Wanda feel less like a naughty comic romp and more like a grotesque aristocratic fantasy. Wanda is essentially an erotic supervillain, living in a gothic schloss with a bizarre supporting cast that includes her young companion Candyfloss, a brutish servant, a mad scientist, and an all-female private army. The strip’s premise gives Mullally considerable freedom: a Wanda episode can become a spy spoof, a mad-science horror story, a political satire, a time-travel farce, or simply a malicious practical joke played at the expense of a man, a public institution, or a recognizable cultural icon. This is a world in which immense wealth removes moral restraint rather than imposing responsibility.

Mullally’s writing is the source of the feature’s bitter flavor. Its comedy is not merely sexual; it is aggressively satirical, often directed at power, vanity, social respectability, consumerism, and masculine pomposity. Wanda’s money and immunity make her the perfect vehicle for exposing a world already ruled by appetite and status. The joke is frequently that society’s supposedly serious figures are no less ridiculous or depraved than Wanda herself. Rather than giving readers a conventional virtuous point of identification, the strip invites them into complicity with its amoral protagonist. That is a riskier, stranger comic strategy than the more buoyant misadventures of Annie Fanny.

The tone also benefits from the Britishness of Mullally’s sensibility. Wicked Wanda has the acidic air of a satire that distrusts authority at every level, but it is not solemn about that distrust. It is flamboyant, frequently silly, and happy to push a premise toward outright surrealism. Its plots can be crude, and its sexual politics can be distinctly uncomfortable to a contemporary reader, especially in the way the material handles power, coercion, and age. But that ugliness is partly inseparable from the strip’s chosen landscape: Wicked Wanda is a comic about people with too much power and too little conscience. Its excesses are rarely incidental; they are the point.

Embleton’s contribution is what elevates the feature beyond an interesting magazine curio. Unlike the deliberately cartoonish line work associated with Kurtzman and Elder’s Little Annie Fanny, Embleton approached Wicked Wanda with painted realism. He used watercolor for the comic’s panels, giving faces, fabrics, bodies, castles, machinery, landscapes, and elaborate costumes a level of sensual texture unusual for a periodical gag strip. The effect is fascinating because the visual surface is so much more refined than the situations it depicts. A scene may involve broad farce, bondage-inflected spectacle, grotesque parody, or a ridiculous villainous scheme, yet Embleton renders it with the seriousness of a lavish adventure illustration.

That tension is the strip’s great aesthetic achievement. Wicked Wanda looks expensive, almost prestigious, even when it is being juvenile, vulgar, or gleefully tasteless. Embleton’s polished craft does not sanitize Mullally’s material, but it gives the comic an eerie grandeur. Wanda herself becomes more than a pin-up figure because she is rendered as a commanding, almost mythic presence: elegant, dangerous, detached, and perfectly at home in worlds of luxury and nightmare. The visual vocabulary borrows from horror films, decadent European adventure comics, fashion illustration, and pulp fantasy, helping the strip build an identity that is far more distinctive than its origins as a competitive response to Playboy might suggest.

Its relationship to Little Annie Fanny is made explicit in early jokes that parody Playboy’s heroine, including gags involving artificial breasts or buttocks that deflate when punctured. These are hardly subtle gestures, but their lack of subtlety is revealing. Penthouse was not quietly borrowing Playboy’s format; it was declaring war on it. Where Little Annie Fanny offered a glamorous but comparatively benign sexual farce, Wicked Wanda presented itself as nastier, more confrontational, and more willing to make sex, class, and media fantasy look ludicrous.

Yet Wicked Wanda is not simply “better” than Little Annie Fanny in any universal sense. Kurtzman and Elder’s strip remains the more formally intricate comedic machine, with Elder’s pages packed with visual jokes that reward slow reading. Wicked Wanda is more uneven, more dependent on its period references, and more likely to mistake extremity for wit. But its best material possesses a singular personality. It is an adult comic that does not settle for supplying erotic ornament to a joke; it makes eroticism part of an entire system of domination, fantasy, absurdity, and satirical venom.

When Penthouse ended Wicked Wanda in 1980, it replaced the strip with Sweet Chastity, again illustrated by Embleton and associated with Guccione’s own creative direction. That succession underscores how important the format had become to Penthouse’s editorial identity. Still, Wicked Wanda remains the more memorable artifact: a decadent, politically irreverent, visually sumptuous comic whose villainous heroine gave Penthouse a genuinely different counterpoint to Playboy’s comic-strip institution. It began as Guccione’s competitive answer to Little Annie Fanny, but at its strongest it became something more peculiar and more enduring—a feverish fantasy of wealth, sex, cruelty, and satire painted with astonishing conviction.

Previous Guilty Pleasures

“Some fears are not of ghosts or demons but of loss, regret, and the quiet mistakes that haunt us long after the night has ended.”

Stephen King’s Night Shift is a fascinating look at the beginnings of one of the most prolific horror writers of our time. Many of these 20 stories first appeared in men’s magazines like Cavalier, Penthouse, and Gallery, where King started building his reputation from the ground up. This collection offers a wide range of horror—from supernatural thrills to deeply emotional tales—crafted with a realism that makes the scares hit harder. The book naturally moves from more traditional horror into stories that shine a light on human fears and regrets.

Although the collection opens with “Jerusalem’s Lot,” a story about haunted history, one of the more striking horror tales is “The Mangler.” It tells of a demon-possessed industrial laundry machine that becomes a deadly force. King’s detailed storytelling turns familiar machinery into something terrifying, driving the suspense from beginning to end.

“Sometimes They Come Back” takes a more emotional route. It centers on a man who is haunted by the death of his brother, with ghostly bullies from his past making a frightening return. This story blends the supernatural with raw grief, showing that some wounds never fully heal.

“The Last Rung on the Ladder” provides a quiet but powerful punch. It reflects on childhood, family, and the pain that comes with lost chances. This tale stands out by demonstrating King’s skill in generating a deep sense of dread through emotional weight rather than monsters.

In “One for the Road,” the tension ratchets up with a story set during a harsh snowstorm near a vampire-infested Maine town. The narrative grips you with its chilling atmosphere, isolation, and fight for survival. Notably, this story acts as a postscript to King’s novel Salem’s Lot, offering an eerie glimpse into what happens long after the main events, expanding that dark world in a satisfying way.

“Strawberry Spring” unspools slowly like creeping fog. Set on a college campus haunted by a serial killer, the story uses an unreliable narrator and a murky atmosphere to create a sense of growing paranoia and confusion.

Finally, “I Know What You Need” explores obsession cloaked in supernatural mystery. A college student experiences an unsettling friendship that appears to improve his life, but underlying this is a dark manipulation. King carefully builds this eerie tale with layers of tension and reveals the dangerous side of desire.

What makes these tales work so well together is King’s ability to vary tone and pace while grounding the stories with believable characters and locations. The rapid heartbeat of “The Mangler” contrasts with the quiet heartbreak of “The Last Rung on the Ladder.” The claustrophobic fear in “One for the Road” stands alongside the fog-thickened dread of “Strawberry Spring,” and the slow-burning menace in “I Know What You Need” rounds out the mood spectrum.

More than just scary stories, Night Shift taps into fears we all recognize: loss, guilt, loneliness, and obsession. King layers excitement with emotional truths, creating stories that stick with you. These fears aren’t just the stuff of monsters—they’re very real and human.

The order of the stories themselves feels intentional—starting with classic supernatural spins like “Jerusalem’s Lot,” and moving toward more internal, emotional terrors in stories like “Sometimes They Come Back” and “The Last Rung on the Ladder.” Some stories also ground horror in real-life struggles, like dangerous, grueling jobs in “Graveyard Shift” and “The Mangler,” where the horror is as much about the setting as the supernatural.

A lot of these stories have found their way to the screen, but while the films are entertaining, most take only loose inspiration from the originals and often don’t capture the full power of the tales. This disconnect doesn’t lessen the strength or impact of King’s writing, which remains impressive and affecting.

Ultimately, Night Shift is a journey through many forms of fear—from sharp shocks to slow-building unease—and its stories feel personal and alive. Whether it’s an industrial machine come to life, ghostly revenge, or a vampire town trapped in eternal winter, King’s tales connect with readers on multiple levels.

If you want horror that thrills but also hits close to home, Night Shift is a brilliant starting place. These stories show early signs of why King remains a master: he discovers monsters not just in the shadows, but woven into the fabric of everyday life. Sometimes, those are the ones that scare us the most.