SOV Horror Review: Death by Dialogue (dir by Thomas DeWeir)


In this 1988 film, a group of college friends visit Uncle Ive (Theodore Lehmann), a crippled taxidermist who lives next door to a film set. (We never actually see this film set, but we are assured that it’s there.) Uncle Ive is taken care of by his devoted housekeeper, Ms. Camden (Judy Gordon). And he needs a lot of taking care of because, for some reason, there’s a haunted screenplay on his property. The title of the screenplay is constantly changing, but the one thing that remains consistent is the word “Victim.” The screenplay goes from being “Victim #69” to “Victim #70,” but what never changes is that there has to be a victim. The screenplay predicts how each person in the film is going to die. It’s not so much Death By Dialogue as it is Death By Rewrite.

Speaking of screenplays, this film has a strange one. It’s never really clear why the screenplay is on the property of Uncle Ive, but there are more than a few deaths that manage to be memorable. There’s a standard bursting into flames death. There’s a decapitation by scarf death. There’s a death by impalement on the blade of a bald demon. Strangest of all is the moment when one of the victims stumbles across an ’80s hair band that just happens to be performing behind some bushes. This leads to death by having one’s head smashed with a musical instrument. What’s odd is that we never really know where the band came from. Were they demons? Were they a legitimate band? What happened to them after the head smashing? How come no one heard them playing? Is this the sort of thing that regularly happens near film sets? I mean, I imagine that sort of thing happened at the Spahn Ranch on a daily basis, but I always figured that was the exception to the rule. Eventually, a big scary demon shows up and we’re left to wonder if he wrote the script and if he did so on spec. During WGA strikes, can the cursed screenplay still kill people, or do they have to hire a scab to write the death scenes until the strike is settled? Personally, if anyone wrote my death in a screenplay, I would hope that the studios would, at the very least, bring in an Oscar-winner to do an uncredited rewrite.

(Actually, now that I think about it, my best friend Evelyn and I wrote a pretty good slasher screenplay when we were in college. We gave the best death scenes to ourselves and the people we liked the most. The people we disliked just got dragged offscreen. I really should get it out of storage and do some work on it.)

Anyway, have I rambled enough? If this review seems a bit disjointed and random …. well, so does the film. But that’s not necessarily a bad thing. This is one of those films where the incoherent story actually works to the story’s advantage. It really does create the feeling of being at the mercy of beings that simply cannot be understood or reasoned with. Featuring a game cast and an intriguingly weird premise, Death by Dialogue is enjoyable almost despite itself. No rewrite was necessary!

Late Night Retro Television Review: Sledge Hammer1 1.10 “If I Had A Little Hammer”


Welcome to Late Night Retro Television Reviews, a feature where we review some of our favorite and least favorite shows of the past! On Fridays, I will be reviewing SLEDGE HAMMER!, a cop comedy which ran on ABC from 1986 to 1988. The entire series can be found on Prime!

Sledge Hammer says to trust him.  Does that mean he’ll be able to find a bunch of missing babies?

Episode 1.10 “If I Had A Little Hammer”

(Dir by Kim Manners, originally aired on November 29th, 1986)

Someone has abducted all of the newborn babies from the local hospital.  Captain Trunk suspects that the babies are going to be sold to couples looking to adopt.  “You mean like a mom and pop operation?” Hammer asks.  Doreau asks to be assigned to the case and Trunk reluctantly agrees.  He has full faith in Doreau.  It’s her partner that worries him.

Most of the humor in this episode comes from the fact that Hammer doesn’t like babies.  The reason why the humor works is because Hammer never changes his mind.  Hammer dislikes babies just as much at the end of the episode as he did at the start.  It provided a nice contrast to not only every other character on the show but also to what we usually expect from television shows.

(Personally, I love babies but I get tired of seeing them in commercials where the whole joke is that they need their diapers changed.)

The babynappers are a brother/sister team.  Brion James plays the brother and it was nice to see that he could handle comedy just as well as drama.  He fit right in with the Sledge Hammer universe.  The big confrontation between him and Sledge Hammer took place inside the warehouse of baby products supplier.  Hey, it made laugh!

This was perhaps the most wholesome show about kidnapping and illegal adoption that I’ve ever seen.