Film Review: Law Enforcement Guide to Satanic Cults (1994, dir. Devin DeHaven)


Title Screen

Well, I mentioned it when I reviewed Show Off! How To Be Cool At Parties (1986) so here it is. The so-called Law Enforcement Guide to Satanic Cults. It’s a Satanic paranoia film. It’s just surprisingly late. I’ve seen Brad Jones (The Cinema Snob) tear into Deception of a Generation and Lisa already reviewed Rock: It’s Your Decision (1982), but that was the 80’s when even Roger Ebert jumped on that band wagon a bit. This was 1994. I only really remember the drug paranoia. Honestly, they called us into the gym in middle school to tell all the students that the only people who needed cell phones and beepers were drug dealers. No joke. The only exception were kids who needed reminders to come to the office and take their meds. Of course, this was also when people weren’t allowed to even have something like Advil on their person. I wonder if that policy still exists in schools. This assembly took place around 1996. Pretty amazing. I also remember later the Internet child predator paranoia. But Satanist paranoia? I only remember hearing about that stuff later on in VH1 documentaries on things like heavy metal suicide. Nevertheless, this movie was put out in 1994 and it’s a piece of work. I am no expert on Satanism, Christianity, or the people in this movie. I will try and do my best. This is probably going to be the longest review I ever have, and possibly, ever will write.

IMG_6831

The problems begin the instant you start the video. Apparently, this was put out or produced by Gun Video Catalog. I can’t help but be a little uncomfortable that a guide for law enforcement is put out by a company that makes videos about guns. Guns are the things that no good police officer wants to deal with in any way shape or form if they don’t have to. Then something funny comes up.

IMG_6832

A viewer discretion warning for police officers? I’m sorry, but if you have chosen that profession, then you have already decided that those things are going to be a part of your life. Plus the title says “Satanic Cults” in it. What would you expect to see? It’s not like it says My Little LaVey: Satan Is Magic or something kiddie. It comes right out and tells you what to expect.

By the way, I didn't try to get him with his eyes closed, but they mostly are because he's dealing with San Francisco Bay winds.

By the way, I didn’t try to get him with his eyes closed, but they mostly are because he’s dealing with San Francisco Bay winds.

Then up comes Gordon L. Coulter. The “Cop/Pastor” in sweaters who is going to take you through this nonsense under the guise of informing law enforcement. Honestly, it’s more like a recruitment video.

IMG_6838

Up comes Satanic imagery. At least one of which is rather humorous and pictured above. Kind of looks like a cross between a scene from A Clockwork Orange (1971) or something you would have seen in an old cartoon. This is the first of several times where Gordon basically complains about two things he doesn’t seem to like about the United States. One, freedom of religion allows people to practice beliefs that he doesn’t approve of. Second, that it’s a shame cops have to follow proper procedure instead of being able to simply drag in any Satanist off the street. I’m being a little harsh, but those messages certainly come across to the viewer. And given things that are said from then on, I seriously doubt I am reading too much into what he says.

IMG_6861

Next up comes “The Three Levels Of Satanism.” First are Dabblers. These are the Christian equivalent of people who just show up on Sunday, but that’s all. The people the movie Super Christian (1980) was directed at. Which by the way, I liked because it had it’s heart in the right place. Then are the people who have “spiritual involvement”. These are the people who might actually believe and are certainly more than just Christians on Sunday. The third are people who have “criminal involvement.” These are the people that hold up in compounds and bomb abortion clinics. Oh wait, he’s talking about Satanists. Sorry, but I can’t recall hearing about many, if any, Satanists in the news my whole life. Whereas David Koresh’s and abortion clinic bombers seemed to always be in the news. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen. There are crazy people who do things in the name of religion all the time. I only bring it up because Gordon uses such broad strokes to condemn every Satanist and make them seem like they are everywhere ready to sacrifice your kids. If so, then Christians are in the same boat.

Great mullet by the way.

Great mullet by the way.

Next we move on to one of the dumbest, most staged, and offensive parts of the film. It begins by saying “Ritual Sites”. Then we are introduced to a “Former Satanic ‘High Priest'” named Eric Pryor. I encourage you to Google this guy. His story is quite interesting. It takes him only a minute or so to take a paranoia film and turn it into something blatantly offensive. Pryor comes right out and says that the people who use the parks are homosexuals and members of the occult. That they interestingly go hand-in-hand. You can imagine what I think of this. Let’s continue.

Notice the Satan Ray?

Notice the Satan Ray?

With that out of the way, Eric magically keeps coming across occult things in a park. An inverted cross. A voodoo VeVe. A rope tied like a noose that supposedly has dried blood on it. Most, if not all, clearly staged. He actually touches the inverted cross and comments that it feels fresh. Maybe because they just finished painting it before the shoot? Also, I looked up Voodoo Veve’s and apparently, they are obliterated during the ritual. That’s why they do them using things like sand. I don’t understand why one would be spray painted on concrete. However, Eric keeps brining up that Satanists love large concrete areas. So do graffiti artists. What park is this by the way? They never tell you. But they sure show this map a lot.

Clearly, an evil park!

Clearly, an evil park!

I’m not stupid, but this confused me for quite a while because there are no markings on this map to show where they “found” these things. It took until almost the end of this section of the video for me to realize that after the map was shown, the next section of the video emerged, starting in a large square, from where it’s supposed to take place. Putting a number or something to identify where this was would have been nice. In fact, at the end of the video when they recap, they do that by placing numbers. It’s needlessly confusing and I kept wondering why they kept showing this map that conveniently glows green like it’s possessed or something. One of the best parts of this is when Eric points and talks about doing a solo in the bushes. Honestly, he uses those words. I know he means that if he were up there to do Satanic things alone, then he would go into the bushes, but after his homophobic statements, I think the worst.

It's that specific bush right over there.

It’s that specific bush right over there.

Next come “The Nine Satanic Statements”. I have never looked into Satanism, but these all read like common sayings with some variation of the word Satan thrown on them. “Satan represents indulgence instead of abstinence.” So does capitalism, among many other things. “Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek.” You could argue that God in the Old Testament does too. “Satan has been the best friend the church has ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years.” You mean like good can’t exist without evil? These are some of the least threatening things I have ever heard. But the music tells me I should be quaking in my boots.

Next come some things that are supposed to cast Satanists as obviously evil people who are going to coax the weak minded. “Gratification of Flesh. Gratification of Ego. POWER.” They could be describing politics or evangelism. None of these things are unique and require a whole special video devoted to point out these things in relation to Satanism. That is of course, even taking their word that these things are part of Satanism. I would have thought of course, but coming after the homophobic statement and the obvious staging in the park, I don’t know.

IMG_6951

Next comes “Initiation”. “A spoken denial of the Christian faith, generally accompanied by saying the Lord’s Prayer backwards.” Oh, you mean Kevin Sorbo’s character in God’s Not Dead (2014)? I thought he was just an atheist, but I guess he could also have made a “promise to sacrifice children to Satan, and marking the initiate with the devil’s mark.” How come I’m not hearing about all these children being sacrificed for Satan?

Now comes the list of crimes that could be red flags for Satanism. Ready! Set! Go!

“Vandalism or Trespass
Cruelty To Animals
Kidnapping
Rape
Molestation
Child Abuse
Child Sexual Abuse
Ritual Abuse
Arson
Murder
Drug Trafficking
Sexual Trafficking of Children
Corpse Theft
Cemetary Vandalism
Black Market Sales Of Bones and Skulls
Black Market Baby Selling
Pedophilia
Pornography
Torture
Church Desecration
Human Slavery
Weapons Violations
Suicide
Disposing Of Animal Parts
Illegal Entry Into Mortuaries and Cemetaries
Necrophilia”

My God! Apparently, any crime could indicate Satanism. I guess when you want to convince cops that Satanists are everywhere, then it’s important to list everything. Not that these things couldn’t be done by a Satanist, but I could go through every single one of these and find members of other religions engaged in them too. This is way too broad to be helpful in the slightest. It only breeds paranoia. Next comes one of the two parts that people frequently mention because it’s funny on sight.

IMG_6983

This is where Eric describes “Tools of Satanism”. It looks like QVC or some shopping channel. Can I get that knife on Easy Pay, Eric?

IMG_6998

Next come the “Cult Symbols”. Inverted cross, sure. 666, yeah. Pentagram, to be expected. “Voodoo ViVi”, then why does it say Voodoo in it? Plus, Eric just explained that Voodoo is different than Satanism? Anarchy symbol? You mean like Sex Pistols fans? Swastika? So Hitler was a Satanist? And I guess that includes Buddhists too. To my knowledge, even Germany which is paranoid about that symbol recognizes it as a legitimate religious symbol for some.

IMG_7015

Next! “Glossary Of Satanic Terms”. I love their definition of a cult: “A group of people who follow a leader, who, through his charismatic ways, command allegiance, belief and worship.” They could be describing the Pope for how broad that statement is. How exactly is that Satanic? Then it muddies the water futher: “Infamous leaders include; Hitler, Crowley, Jim Jones and David Koresh.” Hitler was Christian and so was David Koresh. Crowley, maybe, and Jim Jones, sure, but this is just more confusion. Also, Crowley has a first name. That is unless you meant to point a subtle finger at Ozzy Osbourne’s song Mr. Crowley. After the homophobic stuff, these questions pop into your head.

IMG_7039

I also like the definition of host: “Normally using blessed communion wafers, symbolic of the body of Christ, Satanists insert them into the vagina of the altar, or physically stomp thus desecrating Christian beliefs.” The “vagina” of the altar? Really? You couldn’t have just said opening or something like that? It was necessary to tie it back in with your definition of an altar that “can also be a nude physical female being”? Also, if it wasn’t already clear, nearly all of this “education” is posturing Satanists as trying to destroy Christianity and thus some sort of a holy war needs to be raged against them. But just in case you missed that, here’s what pagans are: “Those who practice witchcraft. The worship of nature as well as multiple gods.” In other words, people who hold belief systems that you disagree with. We all know that’s the actual definition of the word. Of course, I already stated that this is really a recruitment video to bring cops into their movement.

IMG_7056

Now it’s on to “Child Ritual And Sexual Abuse”. We get some shots of kids here. Oddly, one of them is a boy playing with a girl’s doll. How did that end up in here? Well, they say some numbers about the subject, but never cite any sources. Then comes out what seems to be a staple of these videos: the survivor. This girl is simply referred to as “T.S.” and is a “Ritual Abuse Survivor”. As she tells her story, drawings show up on the screen. At first, I thought this was hilarious. They look like they were made by kindergarteners. Just like the map, it wasn’t immediately apparent what the point was to them being there. It turns out these are supposed to represent a child’s rendering of the horrible things Satanists do to them. Couldn’t show newspaper clippings about these crimes that are supposedly happening all over the place? If it’s so common, then they should be easy to find, right? But no, it just goes on to have her recite a poem she wrote about her experiences. I love that it says “helter skelter”, “witches chant”, and “babies burn”. This girl could be telling a true story, but I have no way of knowing. Just as the “statistics” at the beginning of this segment, there are no sources cited. This is just stuff you are being told and expected to believe because, well, they’re Satanists.

IMG_7082

Ready for another list? No, well, too bad, because it’s time for “Symptoms Characterizing Satanic Ritual Abuse And Sexual Abuse In Preschool Age Children”:

“Low self-esteem, feeling of being ‘bad’.
Child feels deserving of punishment.
Child is fearful, clingy, regresses to ‘baby’ behavior
Separation anxiety.
Child is angry, aggressive.
Child acts wild, uncontrolled, hyperactive.
Child is accident prone, or deliberately hurts himself.
Child is negativistic, resistant to authority.
Child mistrusts adults.
Child is overcompliant with authority, overlypleasing with adults.
Child has rapid mood changes.
Child is withdrawn, does not play, or plays in a lethargic or unfocused way.
Child exhibits a short attention span.
Child does not learn.
Child’s speech is regressed and babyish.
Child has a delayed speech or speech disorder.
Child’s speech production decreases significantly.
Somatic complaints; stomach aches, nausea vomiting.
Nightmares, sleep disorders.
Child is fearful of being touched. Fears having genital area washed.
Child touches genitals or masturbates excessively.
Child touches or tries to insert finger into rectum.
Child pulls down pants, pulls up dress or takes off clothes inappropriately
Child touches others sexually or asks for sex.
Child is sexually provacative or seductive.
Child complains of vaginal or anal pain, burning when washed or while urinating or defecating.
Semen or blood stains on child’s underwear.
Detailed and ‘age inappropriate’ understanding of sexual behavior.
‘Hints’ about sexual activity.
Complaints than an adult or older child is ‘bothering’ them.
A reference to blood or ‘white stuff’ in genital area.
Statement that someone had removed the child’s clothes.
Statement that an older child or adult exposed themselves to the child.
Statement that child touched an older child’s or adult’s bottom, vagina, rectum, mouth, etc.
Statement that an older child or adult touched or penetrated child’s bottom, vagina, rectum, mouth, etc.
Statement that the child witnessed sex acts.
On exam, relaxed sphincter, anal or rectal lacerations or scarring, child relaxes rather than tenses rectum when touched.
On exam, enlargement of vaginal opening, vaginal laceration or scarring in girls. Sore penis in boys. Blood or trauma in genital area.
On exam, veneral disease.”

Wow! That’s some list of things that could indicate Satanism. I can’t possibly hit all the problems with this. First off, I am not saying that I might not have made a few typos, but a lot of them are in the video. Apparently, they didn’t bother to proofread this thing. I love how they chose preschool age so that the children are old enough to really exhibit things, but as early as possible in order to horrify us as much as possible. I also love how children are victims of “Satanic Ritual Abuse” whether they are “negativistic, resistant to authority” or “overcompliant with authority, overlypleasing with adults.” So if the child doesn’t like authority, as most don’t, then Satanists might be involved. If the child behaves, then Satanists might also be involved. And what exactly counts as “overcompliant”? Agreeing to wash out your mouth with soap? Taking punishment in general? If this is truly going to help cops identify that Satanism might be the mindset behind some form of child abuse, then don’t you think you might want to be a little more specific? Of course not. At this point, I’m convinced there are Satanists hiding in the bushes of my backyard waiting to sacrifice my dog.

IMG_7120

Can you believe this thing keeps going? Next they talk about “Youth Involvement”. This is where we finally get a voice of reason. A Sacramento, CA Probation Officer named Kelly McGhee. Did this guy even know what kind of video he was being interviewed for? He sounds like he might actually have a good head on his shoulders. Well, enough of that! It’s time for the Satanic Calendar.

Trick or Treat or Satanic Cults?

Trick or Treat or Satanic Cults?

I’ll spare you the list, but it’s noteworthy that Halloween is listed here. Apparently, on Halloween “sex with demons is primary.” What? This video for cops believes demons exist? This is probably the time to mention that the people behind this video were involved with a movement known as Spiritual Warfare. Look it up for yourself, but a key part of it is that things like demons and witchcraft are very real and that you must remain vigilant. It’s no wonder this video is the way it is.

IMG_7150

Finally, they bring up some actual cases. My two favorites are “Richard Berkowitz” and Ricky Kasso. Have you ever heard someone refer to David Berkowitz by his middle name? I haven’t. However, when I Google Richard Berkowitz, a prominent gay author and activist of the period pops up. Again, the way the video is, I have to question if this wasn’t intentional. As for Ricky Kasso. This is one of those famous heavy metal cases from the 80’s. The biggest tie to Satanism here seems to be that he was a fan of heavy metal and had an AC/DC shirt. It all has as much basis in fact as David Berkowitz saying a dog told him to kill people. But Gordon is quite careful with his words here. He doesn’t mention that part, but just that Kasso “required his victim to say ‘I love you Satan’ as he stabbed him to death.” That’s all. I guess that makes Dead Kennedys’ Christians since they say “God told me to skin you alive” in their song I Kill Children. The connection is incredibly weak. People will say all sorts of stuff. Especially to blame other things for their actions. Gordon also says all this like he’s John Walsh on America’s Most Wanted.

IMG_7158

But then comes the feature presentation of this section. The case of Clifford St. Joseph. Google that one. It’s a bit of a mess, and from what I have read, is on some shaky police work ground. However, this time Gordon actually has someone else talk about the case. Enter Prentice E. Sanders, Homicide Inspector, San Francisco Police Department. If you live in the San Francisco Bay Area, then this guy is kind of famous. He was the first African American police chief. However, he was also involved in the “Fajitagate” scandal. I remember that one, not because of the case itself, but the name sticks in your mind. Sanders was later cleared by the courts. It’s interesting in retrospect that this is the guy they talk to considering Clifford St. Joseph has also fought to clear his name. Again, Google it and make up your own mind. After talking about the case, he just goes on to give some good advice like “Educate Yourself” and “Investigate”.

IMG_7170

Then comes possibly the most ridiculous visual thing in the movie. This is the other thing you’ll see posted everywhere. Gordon comes out to a slab with two pillars behind it and pulls back a blanket to reveal a girl in a checkerboard bikini. Really? Couldn’t use a dummy? Instead, it’s necessary to get a young attractive woman, put Satanic symbols on her body, and then point to them over and over. Really?

It ends with Gordon basically saying there are Satanists hiding in every community, small and large, so BEWARE! Then the credits roll. I Googled some of these people. There are only two people I’m gonna mention. First, the producer/director is listed as Devin DeHaven. The only Devin DeHaven I can find is a guy who is heavily involved with making music related material. Even if this isn’t the same guy, I still find it funny that the only Devin DeHaven I find works with hard rock and heavy metal bands. He even worked with Incubus.

The other is “Pastor Dick Bernal”. Again, Google him. He’s very much around to this day. Even on Twitter. In fact, he recently made the news in my neck of the woods. However, in his defense, it’s not so much his homophobia that’s to blame, but the stupid ABC reporter that thought they should ask him if he would perform a gay marriage. It appears that as of late June of this year, he has put all weddings on hold now that same-sex marriage has been made legal in the United States.

From what I can gather, both Gordon L. Coulter and Eric Pryor have passed away. In all honesty, I hope Eric found some peace after the whirlwind that seems to have been his life. I also hope that Gordon moved on with his and tried to forget about this video. But I invite you to do that research if you want. I’m moving on with my life.

Film Review: Programmed To Kill/The Retaliator (1987, dir. Allan Holzman & Robert Short)


Samira (Sandahl Bergman)

Samira (Sandahl Bergman)

That screenshot look promising? Well, it isn’t. Programmed to kill? More like programmed to bore. This movie is like Atomic Cyborg in that it’s a Terminator inspired movie. However, unlike Atomic Cyborg, this movie is awful.

I would love to say the movie is about Samira who is captured after participating in a terror attack in Greece and turned into a killing machine, but it’s not. Look at this shot below and guess when it happens out of the 90 minute running time.

I bet that number you thought of wasn’t 40 minutes! Take a look at the shot below when she kills someone in the field as a cyborg and take another guess.

This happens at 52 minutes. It takes this movie 52 minutes to capture her, transform her, and send her into the field. The movie is only 90 minutes long with credits! Just wow! What the movie is actually about is this guy who captures her, then tries to track her down to finish her off.

Eric Mathews (Robert Ginty)

Eric Mathews (Robert Ginty)

The majority of the film is with him, his wife, and kid. The rest of the time is the surgery and exposition. I love when they are walking down this underground hall with pipes running it’s length. Why? So they have plenty of time to tell us that their plan to turn her against her own people by transforming her into a cyborg is going to backfire down the road. What a waste of time! I wonder if the VHS release of this had a sticker on the front of it that said “Press Here” so it’s audience would know how to insert it into the VCR. Oh wait, this was for an audience expecting something kind of cool so maybe it says “insert to fucking box” like Explosive Fighter Patton for the Famicom Disk System does.

At least we can hope that the action, when it happens, is good, right? Nope, it sucks. The stuff near the end kind of suffers from the 2014 Godzilla problem of not putting enough light on the action. Not that much is going on anyways, but still. I really love this shot below.

It’s clearly supposed to be all arty and dramatic as he talks about how she is out to get those who wronged her, but oh please. It’s like the movie wanted to be taken seriously. As if it had an important message to deliver it’s audience. Atomic Cyborg covers the same sort of territory so much better and has arm wrestling. The best you get here is when she calls up a guy and screeches so loud into the phone that his ear bleeds, he crashes the car, and dies. I’m sorry, but if I want murder by phone, then I’ll watch Murder By Phone (1982).

There is one bright point though. Eric’s son is played by none other than Paul Walker!

Paul Walker

Paul Walker

That’s a good thing for me because it means I can mention Tammy and the T-Rex again. Otherwise, there is no bright point to this movie. It’s just terrible. Please watch Atomic Cyborg or Lady Terminator instead.

Val’s Movie Roundup #6: Good Witch Edition


Unfortunately, the only movies in this series that were available for streaming were the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th films. I am renting the others and will review them at a later date.

The Good Witch's Family

The Good Witch’s Family (2011) – Here’s what I can gather in general about this series. Catherine Bell plays a witch named Cassandra Nightingale who owns an antique/miscellaneous items store in the town of Middleton. Not a witchcraft store really, although it is called Bell, Book, and Candle. She is married and has two children that don’t appear to be her biological ones. I don’t think they really explain that at this point, but I’m pretty sure they’re her husband’s kids. Maybe in the earlier films. Luckily, it isn’t important. You can jump into this series with any of these four films and not really feel lost. Basically, Cassandra stands around looking pretty in nicely chosen outfits acting like Jadzia Dax from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine while minor and meaningless micro-plots pop up around her, resolve, and the movie ends. Honestly, that’s it. It can be pretty boring. Some of these more than others.

This one revolves around a bridge that is going to be built before the town is annexed by Delaware. The mayor likes it while the mayor’s wife doesn’t. They want Cassie to become mayor. Because “family” is in the title, the movie has a tie in with Cassie’s family. In this case, a recently rediscovered family member turns up and causes some trouble using her own witchcraft. All the witchcraft in this is very subtle and implied, not really explicit. Cassie figures out her motives pretty early, but lets things go until it’s time to wrap things up.

This one, like the others is boring, but average. I really must say that the outfits chosen for Bell are quite nice. They do a good job dressing her. It’s a minor thing, but it was enough that I noticed.

The Good Witch's Charm

The Good Witch’s Charm (2012) – Now this Good Witch movie is a stinker. Cassie is now the mayor. There’s a newborn. And a little crimewave is going on. A very minor crimewave. Cassie is caught on video teleporting. I mentioned before that the magic is implied in this series. We do see her suddenly show up when a character turns around, but we never actually see the trick pulled. This time it’s explicit. The video goes viral and a reporter shows up. It’s probably worth mentioning that there is a lady who owns a shop nearby and she is always around. Also, Cassie’s foster mom shows up in town.

Again, a bunch of minor plots that all resolve without really providing anything but an excuse to check your Twitter feed. This just happens to be a particularly boring one. The stupid video thing is stupid and the resolution will have you irritated. If you do enjoy these movies, then I would hop over this one. Even someone who dubs themselves as a lover of Hallmark movies on IMDb said this was pretty boring.

The Good Witch's Destiny

The Good Witch’s Destiny (2013) – This movie is a notch up from The Good Witch’s Charm, but it’s still not the totally average experience of The Good Witch’s Family. There are again micro-plots, but the “destiny” of the title has to do with something her daughter is investigating. At this point, she is in college. She wants to write a paper on the backstory of a family member whose portrait is hung in their house. They refer to her as the Grey Lady. There was some sort of fire and it happened on or around her birthday. Since Cassie’s birthday is coming up, the daughter is worried.

Of course, there’s never anything to worry about when Cassie is around. Maybe she’s always so laid back and confident, not because she is anything like Jadzia Dax with lifetime’s of knowledge, but since she always reads the scripts. This one is wholly unremarkable, but it will not annoy you like The Good Witch’s Charm. I really don’t expect much from a Hallmark movie. They are usually rather formulaic, but these one’s that are really just TV Shows made up of TV Movie episodes seem to be pretty boring. Not sure why that’s a thing. The other Hallmark movies don’t do that. Oh, well. This one’s okay.

The Good Witch's Wonder

The Good Witch’s Wonder (2014) – The biggest problem with this one is that Cassie cut her hair! Catherine Bell looked so pretty with long hair that had bangs. Otherwise, this is the best of the four. Again, some micro-plots, but it has a decent major plot that can keep your attention. No, not the son getting married. Yeah, there’s a son, and the fact that it took so long for me to mention him tells you how important his existence is.

The major plot is basically ripped from a Lifetime movie. A girl is clearly needing a place to hide out and becomes an employee of Cassie’s. A douchebag shows up under the pretenses of doing some work for that lady with the other shop, but he’s really there to come after her. He wants her to steal something for him, then he’ll leave her alone. You know where this all goes. It’s just nice to have a real plot that the movie focuses on and that it is somewhat interesting. This is the best of the four I watched.

I fully intend to get the first three films and if a commenter on IMDb is right, this series lost it’s magic by The Good Witch’s Family where I came in. So hopefully those movies will be better.

Gods of the Hammer Films: Peter Cushing, Christopher Lee, and THE CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1957)


gary loggins's avatarcracked rear viewer

curse4

When Britain’s Hammer Films began in the early 1930’s they were just another movie production company. After finding some success with the 1955 sci-fi adaptation THE QUARTERMASS EXPERIMENT, they chose to make a Gothic horror based on Mary Shelley’s classic 1818 novel about a man obsessed with creating artificial life. FRANKENSTEIN had been filmed many times before, most notably Universal’s 1931 version that brought eternal fame to Boris Karloff. This time however, the producers shot in vibrant color, with blood and body parts on gory display. Tame stuff compared to today’s anything goes horrors, but in the fifties it was considered quite shocking.

Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee had appeared in two films before, Lawrence Olivier’s 1948 HAMLET and John Huston’s 1952 MOULIN ROUGE, though not as a team. Once CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN was unleashed upon the public, they were paired another nineteen times, making Cushing and Lee terror’s all-time tandem. HORROR OF DRACULA came next, with…

View original post 613 more words

Film Review: Atomic Cyborg/Hands of Steel (1986, dir. Sergio Martino)


Paco Queruak (Daniel Greene)

Paco Queruak (Daniel Greene)

I already looked at The Terminator (1984) knockoff film Lady Terminator, but there are many Terminator inspired movies. What makes Atomic Cyborg stand out is that it takes The Terminator and adds that much loved past time of arm wrestling. If you hadn’t seen this in 1986, then you would have had to wait till the arm wrestling greeting in Predator (1987) and Stallone in Over The Top (1987). Actually, the arm wrestling is pretty ridiculous.

The movie begins with Paco (Daniel Greene) going to kill a guy. At this point, we really don’t know anything. Paco tries to kill this guy, but fails. It soon emerges that a bad guy played by John Saxon sent Paco, who is a cyborg. Paco flees to Arizona and takes up residence at a bar with a woman named Linda (Janet Agren). Apparently, arm wrestling is big in these parts. Paco doesn’t engage in it at first, but after receiving a message on a roll of toilet paper, this happens, and it’s go time!

You're On

Arm Wrestling

Meanwhile, the cops are trying to figure out what weapon was used to attack the good guy. They don’t know it was Paco. In fact, them trying to figure it out provides the film with one of it’s funniest scenes. The computer displays an image of the weapon and possible objects it could be. I totally look at that and see an ashtray, don’t you?

Clearly that shape is anything but a hand

Clearly that shape is anything but a hand

Meanwhile, the bad guys are also searching for Paco. You see, Paco isn’t a cyborg in the same way as The Terminator. The Terminator is a machine with biological parts added to create a cyborg. Paco is like RoboCop in that he is a human that, according to him, is made up of 70% machine. That’s why he wasn’t able to carry out his mission. It’s also why he is able to be provoked, form a bond with Linda, and be tricked into a trap under the pretense that some kids need to be saved. They are pissed that he has failed them.

There really isn’t anything else to the movie. I know I say that a lot, but that’s the case with many of the films I watch. They’re pretty simple. While Paco arm wrestles, the good guys try to figure out what happened while the bad guys search for Paco. Here’s a few highlights though. I always feel it’s important to show you, rather than just try and use words. Otherwise, it’s like trying to describe to something living in 2D what it’s like in three dimensions.

The movie is made by Italians, so of course the beat the hero up scene that came into Spaghetti Westerns via Yojimbo is here.

The movie is made by Italians, so of course the beat the hero up scene that came into Spaghetti Westerns via Yojimbo is here.

The rattlesnake arm wrestling scene.

The rattlesnake arm wrestling scene.

Repairs

Repairs

Clearly, this Atari 2600 game will help them find Paco.

Clearly, this Atari 2600 game will help them find Paco.

Lady Atomic Cyborg

Lady Atomic Cyborg

All I can say is, it’s fun. I wouldn’t go out of my way to see it, but it’s enjoyable. I do love the ending screen.

A Baad Asssss Cyborg Is Coming To Collect Some Dues?

A Baad Asssss Cyborg Is Coming To Collect Some Dues?

There are two behind the scenes things worth mentioning. First, if you look up Daniel Greene who played Paco, you will find that he seems to be a favorite of the Farrelly brothers. He’s in many of their films from Kingpin on. Second, John Saxon’s co-star Claudio Cassinelli was killed in a helicopter crash while filming in Arizona. Since this movie wasn’t a union picture, John Saxon followed SAG guidelines and shot all his scenes in Italy. He credits SAG with saving his life because he figures he would have been on the helicopter in Arizona if he hadn’t followed the rules. At least this is according to IMDb.

Val’s Movie Roundup #5: Dogs Edition


Beethoven's Big Break

Beethoven’s Big Break (2008) – Some months ago I watched a SyFy movie called Lake Placid vs. Anaconda (2015). During, or shortly after, one of the actresses named Ali Eagle reached out to me on Twitter. As a result, I added several of her films to my queue. I just happened to get around to this one recently. That’s her above. As for the movie, I grew up with the first two Beethoven films and have not seen the third, fourth, and fifth films that come before this one. The family from those films isn’t here. Now we get an animal trainer whose son finds a Saint Bernard and names it Beethoven because of it’s affinity for classical music. The father is helping another animal trainer who unbeknownst to him kidnaps the dog star of a movie in order to extort money from the production company. Problem is that they haven’t actually shot one scene with the dog. As a result, upon seeing Beethoven, they simply recast. What follows is possibly the largest collection of tired, overused, and old jokes I have ever seen in one film. It’s obviously supposed to be a parody in some ways of the Beethoven movies while also being a reboot, but it doesn’t work. There is no reason to see this stinker. I will probably see the other Beethoven sequels, so we can hope that they are at least a little better.

The Adventures of RoboRex

The Adventures of RoboRex (2014) – You know your Transformers movies suck when a children’s film about a good robotic dog and an evil robotic cat is better. This movie is about a kid whose mother passed away and left him with a crystal. He doesn’t know it’s importance until a capsule arrives like The Terminator with an evil robotic cat named Destructo Cat inside. Soon after, a good robotic dog called RoboRex shows up to help the kid. The cat is sent from the future by Professor Apocalypse to instruct and help his younger self get the crystal. What follows is a slow but sure trajectory toward a final battle. In between we do get a nice little fight between the cat and dog that is more exciting than anything in the 4,076 minutes of Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014). I definitely recommend this one, but two things kind of bothered me. Ben Browder is in this and although it’s only been about ten years or so since Stargate, he looks like he has aged quite a bit. The other part is that they never explain how RoboRex ends up at Ben Affleck’s place in Gone Girl (2014).

C.H.O.M.P.S.

C.H.O.M.P.S. (1979) – This movie has stupid characters and plot, but the dog is awesome! It’s like The Terminator (1984) and Superman (1978). It literally rips off the roof of a car with it’s paws. And you can see from the picture above that it’s a small dog. The movie is about a guy who works for a home security company. Instead of trying to make your standard security system, he looks to nature’s home security system and decides to improve it. He first thinks of creating a robotic Doberman, but probably realized that people had already seen Dobermans rob banks in earlier movies and just copied his own dog instead. The movie basically has three things going on. First, the dog is on an endless rampage to catch these two criminals that might as well have stepped out of Home Alone (1990). Second, the guy and his girl are trying to sell the company on the idea of a robotic dog. Third, is this big black dog that occasionally pops up whose thoughts we can hear. That dog has some mouth on it. It says, “Up your poop, granny” and “Shit”. With Hot to Trot, that makes two talking animal movies I’ve seen recently where the talking animal says “shit”. If you can put aside the problems and just focus on the cool dog, then this one can be fun. It’s a little weird to see the dog’s eyes light up and the head get removed though.

The Amazing Wizard of Paws

The Amazing Wizard of Paws (2015) – This is a movie that would have the Cinema Snob saying “What the fuck!” The script is a mess. The movie begins with what looks like Snape cornering Gandalf against a tree. Gandalf is holding a book. That book will be important…sort of. Next a dog meets up with a kid who has lost his father in a car accident. Snape visits him in the backyard, but doesn’t seem to do anything. Then we jump seven years into the future. That’s where this movie starts to just go wherever it feels like. It sets things up that the dog can talk, the book is magic, and the kid is supposed to protect it using magic. However, despite this evil wizard who wants the book, the kid spends most of his time signing up for talent shows in order to get money so his mother can keep the house. You will find yourself saying, “And the wizard went where? What happened to him wanting the book?” I can’t recommend this movie at all. A total skip. It’s sad because I really do like the dog.

The Devil Made Me Do It: EQUINOX (1970)


gary loggins's avatarcracked rear viewer

equinox2I remember seeing this movie on a double bill at the old Olympic Theater in my hometown of New Bedford, Massachusetts. It was the main attraction, while the second feature was a little black and white zombie opus by some guy named George Romero. NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD was the title. Romero’s film has since been hailed as a modern day horror classic, endlessly written about, analyzed and overanalyzed. EQUINOX has pretty much faded into well-deserved obscurity.

A reporter is doing a follow up story on a strange, year old occurrence. He visits with David, a mental patient who attacks him. The head psych doctor plays him a tape of David’s taped interview, and the bizarre tale is told in flashback. Seems geology Professor Waterman (sci-fi/fantasy writer Fritz Leiber) has discovered something rather unusual and sent for David. He brings along his pal Jim and two girls. They go to…

View original post 325 more words

This week’s “I watched it so you don’t have to!”


I watched it so you don’t have to!

Ghost Fever (1985) ghost-fever-movie-poster-1987-1020255947

Stars:

Sherman Hemsley (The Jeffersons, Amen, The Hughleys)

Luis Avalos (E/R, Hangin’ with Mr. Cooper)

Jennifer Rhodes: (Nightingales, 3rd Rock from the Sun)

Director: Alan Smithee (credited*) Actually Lee Madden

Writer: Oscar Brodney

Plot:
Two African American cops are sent to a run down Southern plantation to evict the residents so a freeway can be built in its place. The catch? The “residents” are all Civil War ghost. The hijinx ensue.

Summary:

After playing the iconic George Jefferson on “The Jefferson”, Sherman Hemsley tried his hand at the big screen in what turned out to be a huge flop. Hemsley mostly funded this movie himself which, literally, left him in financial ruin.

As much as I wanted to like this movie, Brodney’s writing made this feel like a left-over ’80s era slap-stick comedy, without the comedy.

*Director Lee Madden was so unhappy with the way the film turned out that he credited himself as “Alan Smithee” , the Directors Guild of America’s approved pseudonym for directors who do not want their name attached to a film.

If you actually made it through the movie, which I doubt you did, Hemsley also sang the theme song. And just for proof-

Film Review: Southpaw (dir by Antoine Fuqua)


Southpaw_poster

Southpaw features Jake Gyllenhaal as a boxer who loses his wife, his daughter, his career, his self-respect, his car, his house, his manager, his friends, and nearly his life.  But then, about 70 minutes into the film, he gets a chance to get it all back.  Well, almost all of it.  His wife is dead so he can’t get her back but there are hints that he might get together with a helpful social worker after the end credits role.

There was really only one reason why I was interested in seeing Southpaw and that’s because it starred Jake Gyllenhaal.  Last year, Gyllenhaal gave the performance of his career in Nighcrawler.  Gyllenhaal was so brilliant that you just knew the Academy was going to prove itself clueless by not nominating him.  And that’s exactly what happened.  Gyllenhaal was snubbed and, as a result, the Academy now owes him a nomination.  When the trailer for Southpaw first appeared and we saw Gyllenhaal as muscular and bloody, a lot of us assumed that Southpaw would be the film that would get him that nomination.

And Jake Gyllenhaal does do a pretty good job in Southpaw.  He’s one of the main reasons for seeing the film.  It’s interesting to compare Gyllenhaal’s hyperactive performance and sickly appearance in Nightcrawler with his work as boxer Billy Hope in Southpaw.  Billy is a professional brawler and you believe it when you look at him.  Not only is he huge and muscular but he’s got a face that has obviously been punched more than a few times.  When he speaks, he isn’t the hyper articulate con man of Nightcrawler and Love and Other Drugs.  Instead, he stares at the ground as he mumbles and struggles to put together the simplest of thoughts.  It’s a good performance but, at the same time, it lacks the element of surprise that Gyllenhaal has brought to his best roles in the past.  You watched both Donnie Darko and Nightcrawler and you knew that only Gyllenhaal could have brought those roles to life.  Billy Hope, however, is a far less interesting character and you could imagine any number of actors playing the role.  (Reportedly, Southpaw was actually written with Eminem in mind and you really can see him playing the role.)

And really, the entire film is a lot like Billy Hope.  It does its job but there’s nothing all that interesting about it.  Southpaw‘s biggest surprise comes about 20 minutes into the film when Billy’s loving wife, Maureen (Rachel McAdams), is shot and killed and you already knew that was going to happen from the film’s trailer.  After Maureen’s death, Billy starts using alcohol and drugs and, as a result, he loses custody of his daughter, Leila (12 year-old Oona Laurence, giving a great performance).  Because this is a sports film, Billy has to hit rock bottom before, with the help of a grizzled and haunted trainer (Forest Whitaker), he can get a chance to win back both the championship and his daughter.  Director Antoine Fuqua obviously know how to tell these type of testosterone-drenched stories but there’s not a single moment in Southpaw that you won’t see coming from miles away.

And don’t get me wrong.  Unlike some other films that I was less than overwhelmed by, I can actually understand why some people in the theater applauded at the end of Southpaw.  It’s an effective film, even if it does run on for a little bit too long.  It tells a heartfelt story.  It’s a crowd pleaser and I’m sure that a lot of people will enjoy it.  But, for me, it was just too predictable.  I like it when movies catch me off guard and that’s something that Southpaw never came close to doing.

A quick sidenote: Southpaw features the final score composed by the late James Horner and the film is dedicated to his memory.  If you see the movie, be sure to stick around for the dedication so that you can put your hands together for a cinematic and musical legend.

Film Review: Hot to Trot (1988, dir. Michael Dinner)


Don (John Candy)

Don (John Candy)

Before I talk about the film, I need to make some apologies:

1. I apologize to Bobcat Goldthwait for reminding people that this movie exists.
2. I apologize to everyone for reminding them that Bobcat Goldthwait once had starring roles in movies. From what I can gather from IMDb, he did the Sofia Coppola and now works behind the camera. His movies seem to get decent reviews too.
3. I’d like to apologize to anyone involved in the production of the Francis movies.

This is about a moron who came across a movie about a talking horse that had bad ratings on IMDb, then discovered it was available for streaming and thought it would be funny to watch. Oh, wait, that’s my story. The movie is about a moron whose mother dies and leaves him a talking horse. This moron named Fred P. Chaney (Bobcat Goldthwait) works at a stockbroker firm. The firm is run by Walter Sawyer (Dabney Coleman) who really needs some dental work.

Walter Sawyer (Dabney Coleman)

Walter Sawyer (Dabney Coleman)

Let’s apologize to Dabney Coleman while we are here too. Anyways, Sawyer offers to buy the talking horse whose name is Don and is voiced by John Candy. Apologies to John Candy…and horses. This movie really is a blatant ripoff of those movies from the 1950’s about a smart ass talking mule named Francis and his buddy played by Donald O’Connor. Except those are kind of funny. This is painful.

Sex Doll

That’s a blow up horse sex doll by the way. Getting ahead of myself. After acquiring Don, Chaney is introduced to Don’s family. Apparently, Don’s Mom is curious what it’s like to be facing someone while having sex with them. I say it a lot, but no joke, that happens in this movie. We return to the brokerage firm and Don calls Chaney with a hot tip. Of course it pans out and now Chaney has some dough. This is where another set of apologies needs to be issued:

1. I apologize to Little Richard that Tutti Frutti is used in the movie.
2. I apologize to The Replacements that their song Shooting Dirty Pool is in this movie.
3. I apologize to the Beastie Boys that their song (You Gotta) Fight For Your Right (To Party) is in here too. We now know that the Beastie Boys also divorced themselves from their first album because it was featured in Hot to Trot.

Oh, and Virginia Madsen is in this for some sort of love interest, but when horses are saying things like “Eat shit and die!” you can’t bring yourself to care about it. Don’t believe me that one of the horses says that? Here you go!

Bad Words

The meat of the movie basically goes like this. Chaney gets into some zany situations like hanging from the side of a building while a dove tries to do him in. Sawyer and his friend try and figure out how they can also make money using whatever secret Chaney seems to have discovered. Don has a house party with a dog, a cat, a bird, and probably some other animals. It all comes down to a horse race that Don needs to win with Chaney as the jockey. A stock deal goes south for Chaney and this is some sort of final showdown between him and Sawyer.

Oh, I forgot, Don’s Dad dies. Presumedly because they had already made an animatronic horsefly and needed to have some excuse to use it. Don’s Dad is reincarnated as it.

Horsefly

Of course Don and Chaney win the race. They do it by having Don say things to the other horses. He tells one horse that the winners are being turned into glue. He tells another one, who I guess is Spanish, that immigration is here. The jokes are so awful in this movie. And just for one final cherry on top of this dung heap, we get a short appearance by Gilbert Gottfried. Why? Because Don wants a diamond on his tooth like that bad guy in Remo Williams: The Adventure Begins (1985) and Gottfried is the dentist.

Straight From The Horses Mouth

Straight From The Horses Mouth

The one good thing about this movie is that I don’t even need to put in a final verdict sentence. The movie does it for me.

Verdict