Review: Ready or Not (dir. by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin & Tyler Gillett)


“This is some Lord of the Rings bullshit!” — Grace

Ready or Not is a sharp, nasty, and often very funny horror-comedy that turns a nightmare wedding into a vicious class satire. It works best when it embraces its wild premise with full confidence, even if some of its deeper ideas are only lightly explored.

Directed by Tyler Gillett and Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, the film follows Grace, played by Samara Weaving, on what should be the happiest night of her life, only for her new in-laws to force her into a lethal game of hide-and-seek. That setup is simple, but it gives the movie a strong engine: one part survival thriller, one part dark comedy, and one part social commentary about money, power, and inherited privilege. The elegance of the concept is that it does not need much explanation to be effective, because the rules are clear, the stakes are immediate, and the movie wastes little time before letting the chaos begin.

The biggest strength of Ready or Not is Samara Weaving’s performance. Grace is written as someone who feels believable under pressure, which matters because the film asks her to go through absurd, increasingly brutal scenarios while still retaining her humanity. Weaving handles the tonal balancing act extremely well, moving between fear, frustration, disbelief, and darkly comic determination without losing the character’s core. She gives the film an emotional anchor, and without that, the movie would risk becoming just another splatter-heavy genre exercise.

The supporting cast also deserves credit because the Le Domas family is not just rich, but memorably awful in different ways. Adam Brody, Andie MacDowell, Henry Czerny, and the rest of the ensemble help create a household that feels polished on the surface and rotten underneath. Their performances are broadly heightened, but that fits the movie’s tone. The family’s panic, incompetence, and stubborn devotion to tradition become part of the joke, and the film gets a lot of mileage out of watching these people unravel while trying to appear dignified.

Tonally, the movie is strongest when it leans into the tension between horror and comedy. The violence is graphic, but the film rarely treats gore as the whole point; instead, it uses bloodshed as part of a larger joke about entitlement and ritual. That gives the movie a mischievous energy. It wants you to laugh at the absurdity of the situation while still feeling the danger, and for the most part it succeeds. The pacing is also a real asset, since the film avoids spending too long on setup and gets to the conflict quickly. Once the game begins, it keeps finding new ways to escalate the mayhem.

Thematically, Ready or Not is clearly aiming at class resentment and inherited wealth, and that angle gives the film bite. The Le Domas family represent old money, secrecy, and self-preserving tradition, and the movie uses their ridiculous customs to expose how fragile that world really is. There is a satirical edge to how the film portrays privilege as both absurd and dangerous, especially when the family’s traditions are treated with near-religious seriousness. At the same time, the movie is not especially subtle about this, and that can be either a strength or a limitation depending on what you want from it.

That lack of subtlety is one of the film’s few weaknesses. The “eat the rich” angle is easy to understand, but it is not always developed with much nuance, and some viewers may wish the script pushed its social ideas further. The mythology behind the family’s tradition is also deliberately loose, which helps the movie stay nimble but can make the lore feel less important than the film suggests it should be. In addition, the third act gets increasingly outrageous, and while that is part of the fun, not every twist lands with the same force. A few viewers may find the ending more satisfying than the logic that gets it there.

Even so, the film’s swagger largely carries it through those rough spots. Ready or Not understands that tone is everything in a movie like this, and it keeps its balance surprisingly well for something so gleefully chaotic. It is gory without becoming tedious, funny without undercutting the danger, and mean-spirited without losing sympathy for its lead. That is not an easy combination to pull off, and the filmmakers deserve credit for making the material feel brisk and controlled rather than sloppy or overextended.

What makes Ready or Not memorable is that it knows exactly what kind of movie it is. It is not trying to be profound in the heavy, prestige-drama sense, but it is smarter than a simple bloodbath and more disciplined than a pure shock machine. Its pleasures come from its energy, its attitude, and its willingness to let a ridiculous premise keep escalating without apology. The result is a horror-comedy with enough style, bite, and performance power to remain entertaining even when its thematic ambitions are a little broader than deep.

In the end, Ready or Not is a highly watchable genre piece with a terrific lead performance, a savage sense of humor, and a premise that stays potent from beginning to end. It is not perfect, and its satire can feel a little blunt, but it delivers exactly what it promises: a tense, bloody, darkly funny ride through a family dinner from hell.

Ready or Not, Review by Case Wright (Dirs. Matt Bettinelli and Tyler Gillett)


R Or not.jpg

The will to survive is a strange thing. Why do some people give up their wallet or purse to a mugger freely and others snap and fight to the death? Back in the days when I could jog, I was in Central Park early on a Sunday and a mugger tried to take my little POS MP3 player.  I could’ve done the smart thing and given it up, but something just clicked and I started punching and punching.  His face was total shock and he wandered off.  He wasn’t threatening my life, but it didn’t matter if he were, I would’ve acted the same. And Yes, my 93 tracks ranging from Springsteen to Modest Mouse remain safe to this day.  Ready or Not tests whether Grace (Samara Weaving) has the will to survive and she didn’t even have an ipod to protect.

The people hunting people is almost a sub-genre, but this movie had style.  It’s got horrible and quasi-incompetent murderers, a tough but vulnerable heroine, and lots and lots of BLOOD!

Grace is set to marry into a family of rich asshats who treat her like garbage.  Well, except for Daniel (Adam Brody) the brother of Alex – the groom to be.  Daniel thinks she should leave because she’s too good for his worthless family.  Daniel has a point.  The aunt is a mean spirited jerk and all of the people who enter the family are pretty desperate in one way or the other, making them agreeable to participate in their lethal affairs.

Grace decides to marry Alex anyway even though the family’s shitty personalities are on full-display.  The honeymoon begins and Grace must choose a card because she is entering the family.  A creepy box has a playing card and determines which card; sometimes the game is Chess, Checkers, or Hide and Seek.  If Hide and Seek is chosen, the family will hunt the new entrant to the family and sacrifice him or her to Satan- In-Laws … Am I Right?!!!

Grace picks hide and seek and the game is a foot….dun dun dun! This kicks off a lot of suspense and humor as Grace fights her in-laws to the death.  Grace asks her new husband Daniel why he didn’t warn her that his family is a bunch psycho killers?  His response: You would’ve left me.  Daniel, you suck! We all hate you Daniel…A LOT!

The family hunts Grace all over the estate and she gets hurt and screams….and Screams…AND SCREAMS! Samara Weaving’s screams are THE BEST EVER.  They are a mixture of gutteral staccato and high pitched terror and they are legit real.  All other scream queens before her must hail the new Queen.   Here is an example of Samara’s amazing scream queen skills:

RIGHT?!!!! She’s is legit awesome – a throwback and beyond to the glory days of horror. She’s a mix of vulnerable and badass, cunning and funny, basically she rocks this entire movie! Everyone should go see this movie tonight!

Yes, this review is a little brief, but I don’t want to spoil too much.  Enjoy!

 

What Lisa Watched This Afternoon #119: Killer Crush (dir by Anthony LeFresne)


Earlier this afternoon, I finally got a chance to watch the Lifetime original film Killer Crush.

Lifetime-Movie-Killer-Crush-April-2015 Why Was I Watching It?

Killer Crush premiered last week but I missed it because I was at Easter Vigil with my family.  However, I set the DVR to record the film.  Then, I came home and I got wrapped up in doing about a thousand different things at once and it’s only been this afternoon that I finally got a chance to sit down and watch Killer Crush.

What Was It About?

It’s a story as old as the Lifetime network.  A mentally disturbed young woman named Paige (Daveigh Chase) develops a crush on one of her professors (Rick Roberts).  Paige gets a job working for the professor, taking care of his sick wife (Sydney Penny).  Since the film is called Killer Crush, you can probably guess that things don’t go as well as one might hope.

What Worked?

As far as mentally disturbed crush movies are concerned, Killer Crush was pretty good.  Rick Roberts and Sydney Penny both made for sympathetic victims.  Meanwhile, Daveigh Chase fully committed herself to playing the unstable Paige and even managed to generate some sympathy for her self-destructive character.  Director Anthony LeFresne kept the action moving at a good pace.  The end result is an above-average, Canadian-made Lifetime film.

What Did Not Work?

As well-made as the film was, it was also rather predictable.  As far as Lifetime movies about psychotic obsession are concerned, Killer Crush really didn’t bring anything new to the table.

“Oh my God!  Just like me!” Moments

I related to Paige’s relationship with her sister (Melanie Scrofano).  Hopefully, if I’m ever involved in a murder, my sisters will be as concerned as Paige’s sister was.

Lessons Learned

Obsessive crushes never turn out well.  Unless, of course, it’s my obsessive crush on James Franco…

Horror Film Review: Nurse 3D (dir by Doug Aarniokoski)


nurse-3d

So, last night, my boyfriend and I watched Nurse 3D because, based on the trailer that was released way back in January, we thought that it would be a sexy, fun, and enjoyably lurid movie.  Do you remember that trailer?  In case you need a reminder, here it is:

So, we finally got around to watching the movie and oh my God, you guys — sometimes trailers lie!  I know, I know — it’s a shock.  I’m still struggling to deal with it myself!

Actually, technically, the trailer for Nurse 3D doesn’t really lie.  The trailer tells us that the film is about a nurse who is obsessed with another nurse and who spends the majority of the film wearing only a bra.  And that’s true!  But, somehow, the trailer also makes the film look like it’s a lot more fun than it actually is.  The trailer reveals that Nurse 3D is meant to be something of a satirical tribute to the exploitation films of the past.  What it doesn’t reveal is that the film largely does not work.

In Nurse 3D, Paz de la Huerta plays Abby Russell, a nurse who also happens to be a serial killer.  When we first meet her, she’s wandering through a club in a black lace, see-through dress.  In a narration that de la Huerta delivers in an emotionless drone, Abby explains that men are a disease that has been created in an “alcoholic petri dish” and that is now “infecting innocent vaginas.”

“There is only one cure for the married cock,” Abby tells us, “Only me.  I’m the nurse.”

Abby, we discover, specializes in murdering married men who are on the verge of committing adultery.  Sounds like a good idea for a movie, right?  Well, don’t get too attached to it because, once we get through the opening credits, that entire storyline pretty much disappears.

Instead, Abby becomes obsessed with a new nurse named Danni Rogers (Katrina Bowden).  One night, after Danni both has a fight with her boyfriend (Corbin Bleu) and gets yelled at by a jerk of a doctor (played by Judd Nelson), Abby invites Danni out to a club.  Abby gets Danni drunk and drugged and soon they’re making out on the dance floor.  The next morning, Danni wakes up in Abby’s bed.  When Danni refuses to spend the day with Abby and quickly leaves, Abby reacts by trying to destroy Danni’s life…

And that plot line goes on for a while until, eventually, the filmmakers remembered that this was supposed to be a 3D film and, with the exception of one man hurtling towards the camera after being tossed off a rooftop, nothing in the film has really lent itself to whole 3D thing.  So, suddenly, Abby goes from being coolly calculating to being batshit insane, essentially so that she’ll have an excuse to toss medical equipment straight at the camera.

(I’m going to guess that this all probably looked really impressive in 3D but since we were watching the film in 2D, who cares?)

And then, eventually, the movie ends.

I like what Nurse 3D was trying to do.  The film is obviously meant to pay homage to the classic exploitation films to the past.  That was obvious in everything from the overwritten narration to the hilariously fetishized nurses uniforms to the unapologetically sordid nature of the entire plot.

However, the film’s execution left a lot to be desired.  For all of it’s attempts to celebrate over-the-top exploitation, the film never quite seems to understand what makes those films so memorable in the first place.  Perhaps if Nurse 3D had stuck with being a film about a nurse who kills cheating husbands, the film would have worked.  But, instead, it just becomes yet another film about an obsessive friend who turns out to be a psycho and who, fortunately for her, is lucky enough to be surrounded by people too stupid to pick up on the most obvious of clues.

And it doesn’t help that, whatever the joke was that Nurse 3D was trying to tell, it’s obvious that Paz de la Huerta was not in on it.  In many ways, her character is meant to be a throwback to the great and deadly femme fatales of yesterday but  it takes more than having a good body to be a femme fatale.  You have to have style and that’s totally what her performance is missing.  Scarlett Johansson could have worked wonders with the role of Abby Russell but Paz de la Huerta just seems to be lost.

That’s actually a pretty good description of Nurse 3D.  It started out on the right track but, obviously, it lost its way.

Nurse3D