Horror Film Review: Re-Animator (dir. by Stuart Gordon)


“Who’s going to believe a talking head? Get a job in a sideshow.” — Herbert West

Somewhere in a cramped basement lab in Arkham, Massachusetts, a gaunt young man in glasses holds up a syringe of luminous green fluid and announces, with the total confidence of someone who has never once doubted himself, that death is merely a temporary condition. “Don’t expect it to tuck you in at night,” he warns about his reanimation serum. He’s right to be wary, because the things that come back in Stuart Gordon’s Re-Animator (1985) come back wrong. That single image—the needle full of ectoplasm-green juice—is the seed the entire film grows from. It’s a movie about the arrogance of believing death can be solved like a math problem, and it explores that idea with more fake blood per minute than almost anything made before or since. That it also happens to be one of the funniest, most quotable, and most flat-out entertaining horror films of its decade is the kind of miracle that happens only when everyone involved is operating at maximum commitment.

The plot is a beautifully simple delivery system for chaos. Dan Cain (Bruce Abbott), a promising medical student at Miskatonic University, takes in a new roommate: the twitchy, superior, relentlessly focused Herbert West (Jeffrey Combs), freshly arrived from Switzerland, where his mentor met a spectacularly bad end. West has developed a glowing green serum that, when injected into the freshly dead, jolts them back to violent, shambling, extremely angry life. His theory, delivered with clenched-jaw intensity, is that their aggression is merely a side effect of having been dead too long before the injection. It’s absurd pseudoscience, and the film knows it, leaning into every ridiculous beat with a straight face. That deadpan sincerity is the whole engine of the movie.

Gordon, working with producer Brian Yuzna and co-writer William J. Norris, never winks at the audience. A cat attacking West in a basement storage room makes for a legitimately tense scene right up until the punchline. A reanimated cadaver lurking in a morgue drawer is genuinely creepy. Then the film escalates to the point where severed heads are being reanimated in pans of blood, and you realize you’ve been grinning for forty straight minutes.

The crown jewel of the whole enterprise is Combs as Herbert West, delivering one of the great horror performances ever committed to film. West is written as a complete sociopath with zero social graces and an ego the size of a small planet. Combs plays him with clipped, precise, faintly outraged diction, like a man perpetually offended that the universe isn’t cooperating with his research. Every line reading is a small marvel of controlled, over-the-top delivery. West isn’t scary because of how he looks—he’s a scrawny guy in glasses and a suit. He’s scary because he simply does not care about anything beyond his experiments, and Combs lets you see that emptiness behind his eyes even in the film’s funniest moments.

Around him, the supporting cast gamely keeps pace. Abbott’s Dan is the classic 1980s horror protagonist: handsome and increasingly willing to go along with West’s atrocities once his fiancée, Megan (Barbara Crampton), is in danger. Crampton brings more to Megan than the screaming-final-girl archetype might suggest, though she does plenty of shrieking in the back half. Robert Sampson plays Dean Halsey, Megan’s father, who ends up as one of West’s reanimated subjects. Meanwhile, David Gale is magnificently unhinged as Dr. Carl Hill, the smug department head who becomes West’s academic nemesis and, eventually, a headless, telepathically linked villain in one of cinema’s most audacious third acts. You could say Hill really loses his head over Megan, and the film means that quite literally.

Because, yes, the finale is a delirious carnival of gore, black comedy, and genuinely disturbing imagery. Hill’s severed head gets the serum and acquires the ability to command his reanimated body, which abducts Megan. What follows is the film’s most infamous sequence, combining grotesque visual humor with sexual assault. The head-related wordplay practically writes itself, but the scene’s cruelty makes the laughter uncomfortable. Even within a movie this determined to offend, it’s a confrontational moment, and whether it feels audacious or simply ugly will depend on the viewer. Either way, it pushes the film’s collision of comedy and horror to its most extreme point.

The effects team deserves enormous credit for making the physical madness land. The gore, crafted by a crew including John Carl Buechler and Tony Doublin, with special makeup by John Naulin, is cartoonish, wet, and shockingly durable. There are gallons of blood, multiple severed heads, rubbery reanimated corpses, and an iconic image of a head impaled on a shovel. The effects don’t always look realistic, but realism isn’t quite the point. They have weight, texture, and a gloriously unpleasant physical presence that makes the mayhem feel immediate.

What elevates Re-Animator above its splattery peers is that, underneath the grue, it’s a genuinely well-made movie. Richard Band’s score wears its resemblance to Bernard Herrmann’s Psycho music so openly that the familiarity becomes part of the film’s cheeky charm. The pacing is brisk, the Miskatonic setting grounds the madness, and the low budget rarely reads as cheap—just resourceful. Gordon’s background in theatre shows in how tightly each scene builds and pays off. This is a director who understood dramatic construction even as blood poured over everything.

The film also takes enormous liberties with Lovecraft’s source material, “Herbert West–Reanimator,” particularly in its tone and content. But that freedom is a strength rather than a drawback. Gordon isn’t trying to preserve every detail or reproduce the experience of reading the original. He takes the central premise and turns it into something with its own nasty personality. The film captures the queasy idea that a scientific mind unconstrained by ethics is the real monster, then finds increasingly outrageous ways to make that idea entertaining.

That brings us back to the syringe of glowing green serum. Re-Animator understands something many horror movies forget: the scariest monster isn’t necessarily the thing on the slab. It’s the calm, rational man holding the needle who sees no reason to pause. The reanimated cat, the dead dean, the headless professor—they’re all just side effects. West’s indifference gives the chaos its connective tissue. No matter how grotesque the results become, he remains more interested in refining his process than questioning whether he should continue.

The film’s darkest, funniest joke is that catastrophic evidence never seems capable of shaking West’s faith in his own brilliance. Every disaster becomes another technical problem rather than a reason to stop. Forty years later, the movie remains a blast precisely because it plays that arrogance for both laughs and dread. It leaves you grinning while quietly wondering how many genuine Herbert Wests are out there, holding up their own green syringes, utterly certain that death is just a problem waiting to be solved. Maybe don’t watch it right after dinner.

4 Shots From 4 Horror Films: October 11th


4 Or More Shots From 4 Or More Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

4 Shots From 4 Horror Films: October 11th

Phenomena (1985, dir by Dario Argento)

House (1985, dir by Steve Miner)

Demons (1985, dir by Lamberto Bava)

Re-Animator (1985, dir by Stuart Gordon)

Horror On TV: Fear Itself 1.5 “Eater” (dir by Stuart Gordon)


On tonight’s episode of Fear Itself, a young police officer (Elisabeth Moss) finds herself assigned to be a part of a detail that is guarding a serial killer cannibal named Duane Mellor (Stephen R. Hart).  As the night goes on, strange things start to happen and it becomes apparent that Mellor has powers and habits that go beyond just eating people.

You may have noticed that I skipped the fourth episode of Fear Itself.  That episode was In Sickness and In Health and it was about a bride-to-be who, on her wedding day, receives a note that reads, “The person you are marrying is a serial killer.”  It all leads to a pretty predictable twist.  The reason why I decided not to post that episode is because it was written by Victor Salva, a filmmaker who sexually abused the 12 year-old star of his first film and who, after serving 15 months in prison, somehow went on to continue making movies.  I’ve made a personal decision not to review anything involving Victor Salva.  That said, I do think everyone has to make their own decision as far as problematic filmmakers are concerned so I will say that the episode is on YouTube if you want to watch it.

As for Eater, it’s an intense and atmospheric episode that benefits from Stuart Gordon’s strong direction and which features good performances from both Moss and Hart.  You can watch it below!

 

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special 2005 Edition


4 Shots From 4 Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

Today, we pay tribute to the cinematic year of 2005.  It’s time for….

4 Shots From 4 2005 Films

Batman Begins (2005, dir by Christopher Nolan)

The New World (2005, dir by Terrence Malick)

Edmond (2005, dir by Stuart Gordon)

The Call of Cthulhu (2005, directed by Andrew Leman)

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special H.P. Lovecraft Edition


4 Shots From 4 Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films.  As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films is all about letting the visuals do the talking.

This edition of 4 Shots From 4 Films is dedicated to H.P. Lovecraft, on the occasion of his 136th birthday.

4 Shots From 4 Films

The Dunwich Horror (1970, directed by Daniel Haller)

The Dunwich Horror (1970, directed by Daniel Haller)

Dagon (2001, directed by Stuart Gordon)

Dagon (2001, directed by Stuart Gordon)

The Call of Cthulhu (2005, directed by Andrew Leman)

The Call of Cthulhu (2005, directed by Andrew Leman)

The Whisperer in Darkness (2011, directed by Sean Branney)

The Whisperer in Darkness (2011, directed by Sean Branney)

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special Stuart Gordon Edition


4 Or More Shots From 4 Or More Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

79 years ago on this date, director Stuart Gordon was born in Chicago, Illinois.  Gordon went from experimental theater to feature films and was responsible for some of the most visually memorable horror films of the past century.  Perhaps no other American director was a strong interpreter of the work of H.P. Lovecraft than Stuart Gordon.

Today, we honor Stuart Gordon with….

4 Shots From 4 Stuart Gordon Films

Re-Animator (1985, dir by Stuart Gordon, DP: Marc Ahlberg)

Dolls (1987, dir by Stuart Gordon, DP: Marc Ahlberg)

The Pit and the Pendulum (1991, dir by Stuart Gordon. DP: Adolfo Bartoli)

Castle Freak (1994, dir by Stuart Gordon, DP: Mario Vulpiani)

Horror Review: From Beyond (dir. by Stuart Gordon)


“You’re diving deeper than any sane man ever should.” — Dr. Katherine McMichaels

Stuart Gordon’s From Beyond (1986) stands as a darker, moodier follow-up to his breakout Lovecraft adaptation, Re-Animator (1985). At its core is the Resonator, a bizarre scientific contraption designed to stimulate the pineal gland—allowing its users to glimpse eerie creatures and dimensions normally invisible to the naked eye. When Dr. Crawford Tillinghast (Jeffrey Combs) activates the device, it unleashes horrors not just upon the world but also within the minds and bodies of those involved, blurring the line between reality and nightmare in a way both terrifying and hypnotic.

Just like with Re-Animator, Gordon used H.P. Lovecraft’s short story From Beyond as a foundation but expanded the narrative significantly by injecting his own creative vision and filling in what Lovecraft left unexplored. Lovecraft’s original story is a brief, eerie vignette about stimulating the pineal gland to perceive alternate dimensions and terrifying alien creatures—minimalistic and atmospheric, leaving much to the imagination. Gordon reimagines this premise into a fully fleshed-out narrative, adding complex characters like the obsessive Dr. Edward Pretorius and the rational yet vulnerable Dr. Katherine McMichaels. He enriches the story with body horror, psychological torment, and a deeper thematic exploration of sexuality, obsession, and the fragility of the mind. This creative expansion transforms the story into something far more personal and tangible, blending cosmic horror with primal human fears and desires.

This tonal shift stands in stark contrast to Re-Animator, which thrives on anarchic gore, slapstick comedy, and a playful mad-scientist energy. From Beyond trades much of the humor for a somber, unsettling atmosphere drenched in slime, grotesque transformations, and claustrophobic dread. The characters are more grounded in psychological trauma, and the film’s pacing emphasizes creeping unease rather than chaotic spectacle. Gordon’s use of stark, hallucinatory lighting and saturated colors enhances this otherworldly feeling, while practical effects bring a tactile horror to life that heightens the visceral and emotional impact. The horror isn’t just external—it’s internal, a fracture of reality and self.

One of the most notable ways From Beyond separates itself from Gordon’s earlier work is in its overt intertwining of sexuality and horror. The Resonator doesn’t just expose alien creatures; it unlocks primal lust and repressed desires in its users. Scenes imbued with uneasy erotic tension, especially involving Barbara Crampton’s character, make sexuality a core source of vulnerability and terror. This blend of eroticism and nightmare adds depth and psychological complexity, exploring how intimate human experiences can be distorted into something terrifying. It’s a thematic boldness that would become highly influential beyond Western cinema.

Indeed, the film’s fusion of sexual subtext, body horror, and psychological unease foreshadowed themes embraced by late 1980s and early 1990s Japanese horror hentai anime. Works such as Angel of Darkness (Injū Kyōshi) combined explicit eroticism, grotesque body transformations, and supernatural horror in ways reminiscent of From Beyond’s style and tone. This synergy helped define a subgenre of adult horror anime where the boundaries between pleasure and terror, desire and monstrosity, are constantly blurred—cementing From Beyond not only as a cult classic in horror but also as an inspirational bridge to pioneering adult animation in Japan.

Visually and atmospherically, the film is a masterpiece of practical effects and immersive storytelling. The slime-drenched creatures, anatomically warped bodies, and constant visual flow between nightmare and distorted reality create a hallucinatory experience. The climax offers a frenetic, visceral battle that embodies the film’s core themes of madness, transformation, and cosmic terror, leaving viewers with a lingering sense of unease and wonder.

Stuart Gordon’s direction also employs incredibly effective subjective perspectives, with many scenes shot from the characters’ points of view. This technique immerses viewers in the unfolding madness and heightens the sensory overload that defines the film’s experience. There is a famously unsettling point-of-view shot from the mutated Crawford as he perceives a brain inside a doctor’s head and gruesomely attacks. Such moments amplify the film’s exploration of altered perception and the treacherous expansion of human senses.

Despite these strengths, the film is not without flaws. Ken Foree’s character, Bubba Brownlee, while providing moments of grounded streetwise humor, sometimes comes off as a caricature that leans into stereotypical portrayals of Black men as taboo or outlier figures in horror cinema. This portrayal feels somewhat jarring against the film’s otherwise nuanced tone and may evoke discomfort.

Additionally, From Beyond can feel comparatively stiff and sluggish next to Re-Animator, lacking some of the earlier film’s darkly comic energy. The story often relies on a series of increasingly grotesque set pieces that feel more like shock showcases than a cohesive narrative arc. Some performances, including Jeffrey Combs’ lead, occasionally seem overly intense without sufficient emotional variation, and the film sometimes slips into melodrama that undercuts its impact. Furthermore, although ambitious in visualizing Lovecraftian horrors, budgetary constraints are occasionally evident, diminishing some of the awe those moments seek to inspire.

Ultimately, Gordon’s From Beyond is a significant Lovecraft adaptation that showcases the power of expanding upon source material with bold creativity. Moving beyond Lovecraft’s sparse prose, Gordon infuses the story with rich characters, psychological depth, explicit body horror, and mature explorations of sexuality. This results in a haunting, distinctly unsettling film that not only stands as a high point in Gordon’s career but also resonates far beyond its American horror roots, shaping international horror aesthetics and inspiring future genres. It is a disturbing, thrilling journey to the dark spaces just beyond human perception—a cinematic experience that lingers in the mind long after the screen fades to black.

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special H.P. Lovecraft Edition


4 Shots From 4 Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films.  As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films is all about letting the visuals do the talking.

This edition of 4 Shots From 4 Films is dedicated to H.P. Lovecraft, on the occasion of his 135th birthday.

4 Shots From 4 Films

The Dunwich Horror (1970, directed by Daniel Haller)

The Dunwich Horror (1970, directed by Daniel Haller)

Dagon (2001, directed by Stuart Gordon)

Dagon (2001, directed by Stuart Gordon)

The Call of Cthulhu (2005, directed by Andrew Leman)

The Call of Cthulhu (2005, directed by Andrew Leman)

The Whisperer in Darkness (2011, directed by Sean Branney)

The Whisperer in Darkness (2011, directed by Sean Branney)

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special Stuart Gordon Edition


4 Or More Shots From 4 Or More Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking!

78 years ago on this date, director Stuart Gordon was born in Chicago, Illinois.  Gordon went from experimental theater to feature films and was responsible for some of the most visually memorable horror films of the past century.  Perhaps no other American director was a strong interpreter of the work of H.P. Lovecraft than Stuart Gordon.

Today, we honor Stuart Gordon with….

4 Shots From 4 Stuart Gordon Films

Re-Animator (1985, dir by Stuart Gordon, DP: Marc Ahlberg)

Dolls (1987, dir by Stuart Gordon, DP: Marc Ahlberg)

The Pit and the Pendulum (1991, dir by Stuart Gordon. DP: Adolfo Bartoli)

Castle Freak (1994, dir by Stuart Gordon, DP: Mario Vulpiani)

Days of Paranoia: Edmond (dir by Stuart Gordon)


Based on a one-act play by David Mamet, 2005’s Edmond tells the story of Edmond Burke (William H. Macy).

Edmond shares his name (if not the actual spelling) with the philosopher Edmund Burke.  Edmund Burke was a strong believer that society had to put value in good manners to survive and that religious and moral institutions played an important role in promoting the idea of people treating each other with respect and decency.  Edmund Burke knew what he believes and his writings continue to influence thinks to this day.  Edmond Burke, on the other hand, doesn’t know what he believes.  He doesn’t know who he wants to be.  All he knows is that he doesn’t feel like he’s accomplished anything with his life.  “I don’t feel like a man,” he says at one point to a racist bar patron (played by Joe Mantegna) who replies that Edmond needs to get laid.

On a whim, Edmond steps into the shop of a fortune teller (Frances Bay), who flips a few Tarot cards and then tells Edmond that “You’re not where you’re supposed to be.”  Edmond takes her words to heart.  He starts the night by telling his wife (played by Mamet’s wife, Rebecca Pidgeon) that he’s leaving their apartment and he won’t be coming back.  He goes to the bar, where he discusses his marriage with Mantegna.  He goes to a strip club where he’s kicked out after he refuses to pay $100 for a drink.  He goes to a peep show where he’s frustrated by the glass between him and the stripper and the stripper’s constant demand that he expose himself.  He gets beaten in an alley by three men who were running a three-card monte scam.  Edmond’s problem is that he left home without much cash and each encounter leads to him having less and less money.  If he can’t pay, no one wants to help him, regardless of how much Edmond argues for a little kindness.  He pawns his wedding ring for $120 but apparently, he just turns around and uses that money to buy a knife.  An alley-way fight with a pimp leads to Edmond committing his first murder.  A one-night stand with a waitress (a heart-breaking Julia Stiles) leads to a second murder after a conversation about whether or not the waitress is actually an actress leads to a sudden burst of violence.  Edmond ends up eventually in prison, getting raped by his cellmate (Bookem Woodbine) and being told, “It happens.”  Unable to accept that his actions have, in one night, led him from being a businessman to a prisoner, Edmond says, “I’m ready to go home now.”  By the end of the film, Edmond realizes that perhaps he is now where he was meant to be.

It’s a disturbing film, all the more so because Edmond is played by the likable William H. Macy and watching Macy go from being a somewhat frustrated but mild-mannered businessman to becoming a blood-drenched, racial slur-shouting murderer is not a pleasant experience.  Both the play and the film have generated a lot of controversy due to just how far Edmond goes.  I don’t see either production as being an endorsement of Edmond or his actions.  Instead, I see Edmond as a portrait of someone who, after a lifetime of being willfully blind to the world around him, ends up embracing all of the ugliness that he suddenly discovers around him.  He’s driven mad by discovering, over the course of one night, that the world that is not as kind and well-mannered as he assumed that it was and it all hits him so suddenly that he can’t handle it.  He discovers that he’s not special and that the world is largely indifferent to his feelings.  He gets overwhelmed and, until he gets his hands on that knife, he feels powerless and emasculated.  (The knife is an obvious phallic symbol.)  It’s not until the film’s final scene that Edmond truly understands what he’s done and who he has become.

Edmond is not always an easy film to watch.  The second murder scene is truly nightmarish, all the more so because the camera remains on Edmond as he’s drenched in blood.  This is one of William H. Macy’s best performances and also one of his most disturbing characters.  That said, it’s a play and a film that continues to be relevant today.  There’s undoubtedly a lot of Edmonds out there.