Val’s Movie Roundup #24: Late Night Cable Edition


I guess after watching Cyber Seduction: His Secret Life this had to be the next roundup. Also it’s been 21 of these things since I last spotlighted this genre of movies. I know how that kid could have been cured of his addiction. Watching these four movies.

IMG_9416

Passionate Intentions (2015) – This one wasn’t even in IMDb when I watched it. They’re still processing my submission as I am writing this. This movie is one of those that has the absolute bare minimum plot, and the rest is just sex. It’s about a couple. The girl is about to inherit some money and it comes between them for awhile. Really, who cares. However, while the acting is bad, the plot doesn’t exist, and the sex is boring, it’s actually rather pretty. Here’s two shots.

IMG_9422

IMG_9425

The movie may be bad, but at least it was well shot. That’s way more than can be said for some of these. Sadly, they didn’t get someone as good for the sound cause that’s a little off.

Oh, and if somebody knows, then tell me what was with this guy and these dog tags. There are two sex scenes with him where he is wearing them. I don’t remember any explanation given. Is this some fetish I’m not aware of?

IMG_9452

IMG_9463

Sexual Wishlist (2014) – Just like Passionate Intentions, this movie has the as little plot as possible and as much sex as possible thing going on. This time it’s a divorce and an argument over who gets a couple of things that keeps them having sex with other people. But this movie has two things Passionate Intentions didn’t have.

IMG_9472

Frankie Cullen

Christie Stevens

Christie Stevens

I’ve seen Frankie Cullen in several of these movies now and he is almost too good for them. I know he has done a few, but he really should be doing B-Movies rather than these. He has enough acting talent for it. His presence usually lifts the movie up.

Unfortunately, Christie Stevens does the opposite. She gives the worst performances I have seen in any of these movies. Her line readings make Ryan O’Neal in Tough Guys Don’t Dance (1987) seem amazing.

At least her lines in Intergalactic Swingers (2013) were so cheesy that it really didn’t matter, but here she is wretched.

Also, some how this movie and Passionate Intentions were shot by the same person, Lex Lynne Smith, but the difference in quality is almost night and day.

IMG_9482

Pleasure Or Pain (2013) – Now that director Zalman King is no longer with us, they seem to be slapping his name onto anything he did. He’s the one who brought us the Red Shoe Diaries. You know, the TV show and movie series that David Duchovny narrated. I always found it funny that you could watch him on network television in the evening, then tune into late night cable and watch him there too. But to the movie.

This is Fifty Shades of Grey if that movie could have actually shown anything. Seriously, that almost tells you exactly what to expect here. Cut out the pointless relationship BS, horrible attempts at characters, and the stupid negotiation scenes and replace it all with arty eroticism. That’s Pleasure Or Pain in a nutshell.

IMG_9502

As you can see, clearly what was missing from Fifty Shades of Grey was a miniature boat. That’s our Christian Grey.

IMG_9487

That’s our Anastasia Steele narrating the story from what appears to be a radio broadcast booth. I’m not sure if they ever explain exactly where she was and it really doesn’t make any difference.

The two meet, get married, and then it’s just erotic scenes from then on. However, while the settings and exact situations may change, it goes to a certain point and never further. Just like Fifty Shades of Grey did. Both go only so far, then dance around there, but don’t actually do anything. King really tried to get arty with this. There’s one scene that both made me think of Jodorowsky’s The Holy Mountain (1973) and what must have been going on at One Eyed Jacks when Lynch wasn’t there filming Twin Peaks.

IMG_9568

IMG_9559

It’s the best of the four films here, but you will get sick of the erotic stuff. There’s really just so so much of it. I was already hurting by the mid point of the movie wanting the thing over with.

IMG_9576

Monster of the Nudist Colony (2013) – Now we’re scraping the bottom of the barrel. Take a whiff of those fingernails because that smell is Monster of the Nudist Colony. Not even Frankie Cullen could save this one.

IMG_9585

There’s an ape loose at a nudist colony where all people do is have sex. For some reason Cullen, a detective, is sent to investigate. And investigate he doesn’t. The movie is just some of the worst shot on video sex I have seen since Sexually Bugged! (2014). In fact, I’m quite sure that it’s the same crew. I even recognize some of the music, which by the way, is the worst music ever. And it has lyrics. One of them keeps repeating that he’s “Johnny Wet Pants”.

While everyone is having sex, the ape kidnaps and ties up a couple of the girls like Fay Wray or something. Just like the kid in Cyber Seduction is cured by jumping in a pool, two girls dancing naked while tied to poles turns the ape back into a man. Cause of course it does!

This really is the worst kind of these late night cable movies. It’s one of those where the girls look into the camera looking for approval like they’re a cat that’s just brought a dead rat to their owner.

Steer clear of this one.

Film Review: Cyber Seduction: His Secret Life (2005, dir. Tom McLoughlin)


IMG_9179

I completely get why this is one Lifetime movie that Lisa hasn’t written about. This is a total mess of crap. I’m going to borrow Lisa’s format she often uses for reviewing Lifetime movies because otherwise this would probably just be reduced to a string of expletives.

Why Was I Watching It?

Because I was too stupid to listen to the slew of negative reviews on IMDb. Instead, I was intrigued and managed to find a copy of this thing.

What Was It About?

I can tell you what it was supposed to be about. It was supposed to be about a teenage boy who gets addicted to porn. In reality, I think it’s about how seeing big breasts means you will become addicted to energy drinks and you will go insane when you go through puberty and never masturbate.

The movie begins with a kid who has been beaten up jumping into a pool. Cut to three months prior and the kid is swimming in a meet. In no time, this kid is introduced to porn and since his girlfriend wants to remain a virgin, he gets hooked. He also just gets hooked on energy drinks at the same time. Because it’s nearly impossible to look at porn without massive amounts of caffeine in you. Honestly, I think they put that in the movie so they would have even more of a reason for why his swimming and school work suffers.

His Mom (Kelly Lynch) spots the porn because this kid is too stupid to close his door. He’s dumb enough to not shut his door, but later he suddenly becomes smart enough to hack through the library firewall to look at porn. HA!. Later he introduces his younger brother to porn.

Now, when I say he’s addicted to porn, it’s a little more complicated. Sometimes it’s just plain porn like this.

IMG_9231

But a lot of the time it’s this girl named Monica who apparently goes to school with him. There is so little information about her that all I can say is that she is supposed to be a senior. Honestly, I’m quite sure they never even tell us why she puts herself out there like that. No money seems to come her way. At least the girls on Degrassi: TNG set up a business.

IMG_9204

The film plays out like the kid has a drug problem. You’ve seen those films a million times so you know how it plays out. There’s really only two things left to talk about.

First, this bizarre scene where he is surrounded by women in the water.

IMG_9337

Second, the ending of the movie. I hate to use the word slut, but I honestly don’t know of any other way to describe how they portray Monica. She actually meets with him at a restaurant, moves to the other side of the booth, grabs his hand and puts it on her breast. No explanation whatsoever except she seems to be super horny. It’s really weird. Now the ending. He appears to get beat up by the boyfriend of Monica because she’s a slut, then he jumps in the pool, and is suddenly cured of his porn addiction. This movie is more of a mess than Nukie.

What Worked?

Nothing. Okay, it did get the bit right about how porn sites would generate a seemingly endless amount of popups. I really think that’s it.

What Did Not Work?

Everything else.

“Oh my God! Just like me!” Moments

I have also looked at porn on the Internet. But I was never dumb enough to do it when my parents could easily see it. It’s no wonder his parents say that swimming is the only way he’s going to college. It’s not money. They know their son rivals Bill Pullman’s character in Ruthless People (1986).

Lessons Learned

If someone tells you there is a Lifetime movie worse than this, then avoid it because your life may depend on it. Honestly, I have not watched a movie this bad since Ricky 1 (1988). Up to now I have only referred to it as the movie that shall not be named, but this is on par with it so I have no choice. That means it’s horrifyingly bad.

Val’s Movie Roundup #23: Hallmark Edition


MV5BMTYxNjM5NTg1MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDc0NzczMQ@@._V1_SY317_CR5,0,214,317_AL_

Just Desserts (2004) – It’s not every day that I get four decent Hallmark movies. This one I actually enjoyed quite a bit. It’s about a baker whose family bakery is falling on hard financial times. There is a cooking contest going on and he decides to enter. Apparently, his family has some baking secrets. Our main character Marco Poloni (Costas Mandylor) knows his stuff and even some of the bigwigs in the industry, but got slighted along the way and decided to kind of remain in obscurity. However, with the bakery in trouble and a contest that could help draw crowds, he decides to step out of the shadows. Problem is he needs a partner. That’s not an issue though. During a conversation at a fancy restaurant where he is having a discussion on the bakery being bought out, he tries a dessert and it’s almost right according to him. He has a partner! It’s pretty funny, because he comes back to the restaurant and just barges right into her kitchen to ask her to help him with the contest.

The rest is exactly what you expect. What makes it work is largely Costas Mandylor’s performance. Lauren Holly does a good job too. Amazingly, this movie was directed by Kevin Connor who brought us the epic disaster Strawberry Summer. The only problem I can think of here is that I was disappointed that they didn’t have Poloni make a reference Nicolas Cage’s character in Moonstruck (1987). Seriously, you see him walk in front of ovens in a white undershirt and you want him to yell, “I lost my hand! I lost my bride! Johnny has his hand! Johnny has his bride!”

IMG_9803

IMG_9174 (1)

I definitely recommend this one.

Beforeyousayido-Poster

Before You Say ‘I Do’ (2009) – This one you really have to judge in two separate parts. This movie is about a guy (David Sutcliffe) who proposes to a girl (Jennifer Westfeldt), only to have her change her mind because she was burned by a bad marriage 10 years prior. So while going through a yellow light, he makes a wish that something could be done about what happened to her 10 years before. He is then hit by a car and now he’s in 1999.

The first part of this movie works. The two actors and Lauren Holly do a good job. He immediately goes to where she was working in 1999 believing that they will fall in love at first sight, but it doesn’t happen. So, he warms up to her friend played by Lauren Holly and works to make his way into her life while also trying to talk her out of the upcoming disastrous marriage. This stuff works well enough to enjoy the film. I liked David Sutcliffe and Lauren Holly. Jennifer Westfeldt is good enough. Kind of looks like Phoebe from Friends though. This part really is okay.

But there’s the second part. That’s the time travel. It’s not broken per se, but it’s like they didn’t even try. Really, the only honest attempt I saw to make it look like 1999 was that they had all the computer screens be CRTs. Jennifer Westfeldt looks exactly the same as she did in 2009. They didn’t even bother to change her hair. They also leave it up to you to figure out that he hasn’t gone back in time Back To The Future style, but Quantum Leap style. That is, instead of physically traveling there and thus, there being two of him, he has become unstuck in time and slipped back into his 1999 self. Also, if you went back in time to 1999, we all know it would come up at least once. But nope, he never mentions 9/11. They could have fixed that issue completely by just having him go back 7 years instead. It’s a stupid mistake that is just one more thing that should have been fixed if they were going to put in any effort to the time travel part of the story.

Still, throwing aside that the time travel stuff is a bit of a mess, the romantic comedy works well enough. Not a seek out, but you’ll be okay if this happens to be on.

The-Note-II-Taking-a-Chance-on-Love-Christian-Movie-Christian-Film-DVD-Genie-Francis-Angela-E.-Hunt

Taking A Chance On Love (2009) – It’s weird, but unintentionally I am working backwards through The Note trilogy. This one is definitely better than the third one. It’s still forgettable, but better. This time Peyton McGruder (Genie Francis), the advice columnist, has a woman come up to her and say I love your column, but your advice on taking a chance on love is idiotic. Then she just walks away. It’s rather humorous.

In this one McGruder is not married to Kingston Danville (Ted McGinley). Also, we get to meet the girl that McGruder gave up for adoption many years prior. I think near the end of the film we find out McGruder tried to kill herself while she was pregnant with her. Since that didn’t pan out, she gave birth and put her up for adoption. It seems the girl’s parents went out of the picture and McGruder came back into her life. I’m sure all this information is in the first film. Unfortunately, this movie kind of leaves you in the dark for about 30 minutes. You will think that it’s impossible to watch this one without having seen that one. But that’s not true. You reach 30 minutes and there’s enough exposition that you can follow the movie. Till then it’s a little rough.

Basically, there are four things going on here. The lady who came up to McGruder and insults her needs help resolving a very old incident involving two guys and baby that happened many years ago. McGruder needs to get over her hesitancy and just marry King. McGruder’s daughter needs to stop drinking and not feel she’s in any danger if McGruder gets married. Finally, King and his son need to both get on the same page about the son wanting to be a photographer. That’s it. Just like Signed, Sealed, Delivered, it’s very character driven, not plot driven. It’s not as good as Signed, Sealed, Delivered though.

For those of you who remember when I reviewed the third one, yes, McGinley does have an assholery moment that happens for a minute without really any lead up or anything to follow it. I really want to see the first one just to see if that one has a similar scene. I’m not sure why that’s a thing with these movies, but it seems to be true.

Also, because this is Hallmark, it should be no surprise that two actors from Degrassi: TNG make an appearance. John Bregar who played Dylan is King’s son and Raymond Ablack makes a brief appearance.

Married With Children meets Degrassi: TNG

Married With Children meets Degrassi: TNG

Oh, and unless I missed something or the plot summary on IMDb is wrong, that’s not a California license plate.

IMG_9811

This one is fine, but I get the feeling that The Note trilogy is like the first five Friday the 13th movies. Individually, there not so good, but taken together, then you have something. I’ll find out eventually. Just as all streams lead to the toilet in computer science, it seems that all Hallmark movies eventually come to me. I swear that’s a saying I read in a computer science textbook many years ago.

BOB DIANE GIANT PUMPKIN SHANNON D. (OP 2)

Growing The Big One (2010) – Nope, you’d think there was, but according to IMDb there’s only a serious of porn films called Chasing The Big Ones. Not sure how Hallmark lucked out on this title, but good for them.

Now let’s talk about the movie. This is probably my favorite of the four films here. I like Shannen Doherty. She’s never going to win any major awards for acting, but I always seem to enjoy her performances. Kavan Smith is good too. I enjoyed him on Eureka. He is actually pretty interesting because of the way he looks. He can easily come across as a really kind and nice man, but all he has to do is make the most subtle adjustment to his facial expression, and it’s oh my God, he’s a psychopath. For some reason I really like that about him.

Doherty plays a radio show host from Seattle whose grandfather dies so she goes to the country to see this pumpkin farm she has inherited. Suddenly, her job back home disappears when she hears someone else on the radio in her slot. Well, not disappear, she’s reassigned. They want her on this plant show because everyone is going green these days. It’s stupid and Doherty calls them on it, but once her boss hears she now has a farm in the country, her fate is sealed. Thus, Doherty now lives in the country where she broadcasts and livestreams via webcams about a subject she is totally ignorant about.

Enter Kavan Smith! If he was in the film before this, I don’t care, nor do I remember because I want to believe this was the first time we see him. In the middle of the night he tries to break into her house and Doherty nearly maces him. He claims he was fixing the lock because he was friends with her grandfather, but we know he was there to steal the pumpkin seeds. Her grandfather was well known for growing the biggest pumpkins because of his secret method and special seeds. Is there a contest for growing the biggest pumpkin that will make the show a hit, carry the rest of the film, and bring Smith and Doherty together? Of course there is!

This is a movie that works because the two actors are just so enjoyable to watch. I didn’t really think they had any chemistry together, but I didn’t care. I enjoyed it.

One other thing to mention. There is a guy in town who sells manure. His mascot is a superhero character. He even dresses as this superhero at one point. They never say it, but that means his mascot is Shitman.

Film Review: Black Fly (dir by Jason Bourque)


blackfly_s

“It’s just another fond memory of country living.”

— Noel Henson (Matthew McCaull) in Black Fly.

Black Fly, an intense psychological thriller from Canada, tells the story of two brothers.

On an isolated island, Noel Henson (Matthew McCaull) lives on the farm that was once owned by his parents.  He has a mullet, he loves his dog, and he ends each workday with a cold beer.  And maybe it’s because I’ve got plenty of country in my background as well but, as soon as I saw him, I immediately recognized Noel’s type.  He’s outwardly friendly but definitely prefers to have space of his own, the type who likes to live by his own rules and will probably never forgive you if you break one of them.  You would definitely want to help build your house but you might not necessarily invite him to come inside of it afterward.

Noel’s younger brother is Jake (Dakota Daulby).  Maybe because I’ve always had a weakness for sensitive and artistic loners, I felt that I immediately knew Jake’s type as well.  He’s the guy who has been let down one too many times by everyone around him.  He’s got a sketchbook full of drawings of monsters and fantasy girlfriends.  When it comes to someone like Jake, you’re torn between feeling sorry for him and fearing what will happen if he ever truly loses control of his anger.  When we first meet Jake, he is escaping from his abusive uncle.  When he shows up at the island, Noel is there to greet him.  It’s been years since the two brothers were together but it quickly becomes obvious that Jake idolizes Noel.

At first, everything appears to be perfect between Jake and Noel but slowly, cracks start to appear.  Jake and Noel’s childhood was hardly ideal.  Their abusive father was shot while hunting.  Their mother committed suicide.  Noel is overly possessive of his girlfriend, Paula (Christie Burke), and she appears to have some secrets of her own.  A violent motorcycle gang has recently shown up on the island and is trying to intimidate Noel into leaving his home.

And, of course, one of the brothers is a murderer.

Now, I’m not going to tell you which brother is a murderer.  One of the best things about Black Fly is that, up until we witness the film’s first murder, we are kept guessing as to which brother will turn out to be the murderous one.  At first, it’s easy to imagine either one of the two brothers turning out to be a murderer.  Both McCaull and Daulby give totally believable and authentic performances.  At first, they’re both likable but, as the film progresses, we get small clues of trouble underneath the surface.  And those small clues become bigger and bigger until the violence finally explodes on-screen.

blackfly

Black Fly was written and directed by filmmaker Jason Bourque.  That name should be familiar to our regular readers because he previously wrote the script for End of the World, a film that I enjoyed so much that, two years after it originally aired, I’m still taking advantage of any excuse to link to my review of it.  Bourque’s direction of Black Fly is atmospheric and suspenseful, making great use of some truly desolate locations.  Whether it’s the trailer park that Jake flees at the start of the film or the dilapidated farm that Noel calls home, the locations in Black Fly are just as important as the characters, with the decay of the island neatly mirroring the decay of Noel and Jake’s relationship.  As the film reaches its violent conclusion, Bourque’s direction keeps the audiences off-balance and throws us straight into the tension-filled world of the characters.

Based on a true story, Black Fly is a potent and visceral look at guilt, violence, and family secrets.  It will be having its U.S. premiere at the Arizona Underground Film Festival on September 25th, followed by two showings at the San Diego Film Festival on October 1st and October 3rd.

Insomnia File No. 7: Fair Game (dir by Andrew Sipes)


What’s an Insomnia File? You know how some times you just can’t get any sleep and, at about three in the morning, you’ll find yourself watching whatever you can find on cable? This feature is all about those insomnia-inspired discoveries!

Fair_game

On Tuesday night, if you were suffering from insomnia at midnight, you could have turned over to HBO Signature (commonly listed as HBOSIG) and watched Fair Game, a remarkably mindless action film from 1995.

Originally, my plan was to start this review of Fair Game by telling you, in quite a bit of detail, just how sick I am of the Russian Mafia.  Seriously, Russian mobsters have become the default villain for lazy crime films everywhere.  And, quite frankly, I’m getting bored with them.  I’m bored with how the head Russian mobster is always described as being “former KGB” and is always found sitting in the back room of restaurant, wearing an overcoat and smoking filterless cigarettes.  I am bored with how his main henchman is always some big guy with a crew cut and that guy always has a thin sidekick who wears his hair in a pony tail and has a bad mustache.  I’m sick of the overexaggerated accents of American and British accents trying to sound Russian and the way they’re always listening to EDM while driving.  It’s all so predictable and tedious.

But then I considered that Fair Game was made 20 years ago.  Even if the villains are Russian mobsters and even if they are some of the least interesting Russian mobsters in cinema history, it’s totally possible that, when Fair Game, was made, there was still some sort of novelty about the Russian Mafia.

However, even if we give Fair Game a pass on using the cliché of the Russian mob, the villains still weren’t particularly interesting.  Kazak (Steven Berkoff) is … well, the film isn’t really that clear on what Kazak’s big plan is but he has a lot of henchmen and they certainly do end up killing a lot of people.  Kazak runs his operations off of a yacht that belongs to a Cuban criminal named Emilio (Miguel Sandoval).  Emilio is in the process of getting divorced and attorney Kate McQuean (model Cindy Crawford, who made her film debut here and has never played a leading role since) is determined to repossess his boat.  So, Kazak decides that the perfect solution would be to murder Kate…

Which makes absolutely no sense.  Kazak doesn’t want anyone to discover his operation so he decides to blow up a good portion of Miami, all in pursuit of one person.  Wouldn’t it make more sense for Kazak to just blow up the boat and buy a new one?

Anyway, as the film opens, Kate is out jogging when suddenly someone driving by in a car opens fire on her.  She ends up getting grazed in the arm, not that it seems to bother her.  She wears a bandage for a few scenes but it soon vanishes.  Kate is all business so, even after getting shot, she still goes into the office and starts to make plans to repossess that yacht.  Personally, if anyone ever shot at me, I would probably be so freaked out that I would never leave the house again.

Now, you may be thinking that Kate was shot because of Kazak but actually, it turns out that the shooting was just a random thing that happened.  Apparently, the shooter was trying to shoot someone else and Kate just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  So, we never find out who actually shot Kate and that really bothered me, as that seems to be kind of a huge plot point to bring up and then refuse to resolve.

Anyway, Kate meets a detective named Max Kirkpatrick (William Baldwin) and, soon, they’re on the run from Kazak’s assassins.  The majority of the film is made up of Max and Kate running from one location to another.  One thing that really bothered me was that literally everyone that Max and Kate talked to ended up getting killed just a few minutes later.  At one point, Kate flirts with a computer service expert to get him to help them out.  The scene is played for laughs but then, five minutes later, that same innocent technician guy is being brutally tortured by a bunch of Russians and, though we don’t see it happen, it’s safe to assume that he was eventually murdered by them.  And no point do Max or Kate appear to feel any guilt or concern about the number of innocent people who are killed just for associating with them.

Anyway, Fair Game is a completely mindless film that has a rather nasty streak of sadism to it.  (I imagine, when this film was released, it probably set a record for close-ups of people getting shot and stabbed in the crotch.)  William Baldwin and Cindy Crawford both have perfect bodies and give totally wooden performances, which leads to them having a dimly-lit sex scene that is both physically hot and emotionally cold at the same time.

(I have no idea what entropy at absolute zero means but it sounds like a pretty good description of the chemistry between Cindy Crawford and William Baldwin in Fair Game.)

One good note: Salma Hayek has a small role as Max’s ex-girlfriend.  Whenever she shows up in the movie, she starts screaming at everyone.  I don’t blame her.

Fair Game

Previous Insomnia Files:

  1. Story of Mankind
  2. Stag
  3. Love Is A Gun
  4. Nina Takes A Lover
  5. Black Ice
  6. Frogs For Snakes

 

The Daily Grindhouse: The Undertaker and His Pals (dir by T.L.P. Swicegood)


undertaker_and_his_pals_poster_01

Say what you will about the overall quality of the 1966 horror-comedy, The Undertaker And His Pals, it has an absolutely brilliant opening shot.  One man on a motorcycle drives around in a circle in a parking lot.  He’s wearing a leather jacket and his features are hidden underneath a white helmet.  Soon, another man wearing a leather jacket and white helmet rides up on another motorcycle.  And again, they circle the parking lot.  And then, they’re joined by a third identically dressed man on yet another motorcycle and the three of them circle the parking lot before then driving off into the city.  The night is dark, the city streets are otherwise deserted, and the entire scene is tinted an otherworldly yellow.  It’s a truly creepy scene and, for those first few moments of the film, those three faceless riders are truly frightening.  If you ever watch The Undertaker and His Pals, be sure to appreciate that opening scene because nothing else in the film matches it.

It turns out that our three motorcycle riders are up to no good.  Two of them own a restaurant and, because they’re too cheap to actually order fresh meat, they kill people and serve them up as the special of the day.  The third one is the local undertaker.  Business has apparently been struggling so he’s started killing people so that he can get paid to provide them a funeral.  Apparently, half of each corpse is turned into lunch meat while the other half is put in a cheap, wooden casket at Shady Rest Funeral Parlor.

Now, here’s what makes The Undertaker and His Pal such a strange movie.  The murders are graphic and gory (and I imagine they were quite extreme for 1966) but the rest of the movie is an over-the-top comedy, full of bad puns and slapstick.  At the start of the film, while the latest victim is being stabbed to death, the camera continually cuts to a photograph of her sailor boyfriend, looking more and more upset with each cut.  Later, the undertaker accidentally steps on a skateboard and we watch as he uncontrollably careens into the middle of the street while everyone else in the film points and laughs.  When the undertaker finally falls off the skateboard, we even hear a waa waa on the soundtrack.  After the undertaker has his accident, the owner of the diner accidentally insults a customer and literally gets a custard pie thrown in his face.  (And again, we hear that waa waa.)

And then there’s the names!  The film’s first victim is named Sally Lamb.  The next day, the special at the diner is literally “Leg of Lamb.”  When an administrative assistant named Ann Poultry complains about the poor quality of her leg of lamb and threatens to call the health department, the next day’s special is “Breast of Chicken.”

Ann worked for and was dating a detective named Harry Glass (James Westmoreland, appearing here under the name Rad Fulton).  After her death, Harry is … well, Harry really doesn’t seem to care.  Harry is the film’s nominal hero but he really doesn’t do anything.  In fact, he is remarkably stupid.  Though he claims that he’s trying to solve his girlfriend’s murder, he seems to spend most of his time unknowingly eating her down at the diner.

The Undertaker and His Pals is weird and yet strangely watchable.  Of course, it helps that the film is only 66 minutes long and that the acting so cartoonish (and, I think, intentionally so) that it’s impossible to take the movie seriously.  (If the film was, in any way, believable, it would be almost unbearably grim and misogynistic.)  Fortunately, the film ends with clips of the entire cast coming back to life and laughing, letting us know that no one was intentionally harmed or traumatized and apparently, everyone had a great time making The Undertaker and His Pals.

I imagine the film was made to capitalize on the success of Herschell Gordon Lewis’s similarly over the top Blood Feast.  Ultimately, The Undertaker and His Pals works best as a weird time capsule of what was shocking in 1966.

undertakerpals5

Film Review: Rock: It’s Your Decision (1982, dir. John Taylor)


IMG_8963

Lisa’s review

“If you listen to fools. The mob rules!”
-The Mob Rules by Black Sabbath (1981)

I’m finally taking Lisa up on doing my own review of this thing. Guess I kind of have to after reviewing Law Enforcement Guide To Satanic Cults. Is this really going to be my thing now? Reviewing fundamentalist paranoia films and other religious movies. Well, they can be entertaining, and I’m still hoping to find a copy of Super Christian 2, so maybe. If you want to skip right to the sermon, then I’ve marked it below. Otherwise, let’s get this party started.

IMG_8956

The movie opens at a rock concert. The band is playing a generic song about having an unspecified good time. Since this film is about how rock music is a tool of Satan, I have to call bullshit right here. We all know that Kool & the Gang’s Celebration didn’t become a sin till Ross played it using the bag pipes on Friends.

Then we cut to a house where loud rock music is playing. This is when we meet Jeff who clashes with his mother over rock music. He storms from the house, gets in his car, and drives off. He nearly gets into an accident because he’s so worked up. He turns on the radio and the song that is playing has the lyrics: “Can’t walk on water. Got a ball and chain.” When you have a son that doesn’t like you telling him to turn down his music, what do you do? Well, complain to your husband that’s out of town, then call his youth minister. The youth minister can surely remind him of obedience. Not that she tried to do it herself. Her husband even asks if she talked to him again, but she says no that won’t work. Oh, and where Jeff drove to is church. This kid is clearly on a highway to hell.

“I’ve had enough of being programmed
And told what I ought to do
Let’s get one thing straight
I’ll chose my fate
And it’s got nothing to do with you”
– You Don’t Have To Be Old To Be Wise by Judas Priest (1980)

IMG_8981

Next we cut to the youth meeting at the church where one of Jeff’s friends is complaining about everyone coming to the church to tell him how sinful he is. Jeff says to himself that he feels a certain way. That whatever that is, is the reason he clashes with his mother. This is the first mention of a main part of the message in this film. That being that rock music actually controls you against your better judgement. You know, the same thing that people who claim to speak for God can. Just pointing out when they do the, but it’s okay when Christianity does it, bit.

Then he gets home and apologizes to his mother. Also, apparently there were two kids that were saved at the meeting. I know what he means, but based on the rest of the material in the movie, being saved apparently means giving up all individuality and free will to follow what older people tell you God wants you to do. Then he goes into his room and turns on the stereo. The song is great. The lyrics keep repeating “devils and demons have taken your life.” No, no, no. If we are going down that route, then I have much better lyrics:

“God told me to skin you alive.

I kill children
I love to see them die
I kill children
And make their mamas cry
Crush ’em under my car
I wanna hear them scream
Feed ’em poison candy
To spoil their Halloween”
-I Kill Children by Dead Kennedys (1980)

See ma, it could be much much worse.

IMG_9006

Now mom meets with youth pastor Jim Owen about how her son gets angry when he is told he can’t listen to the music he enjoys. Owen is quite interesting in this movie because of the things he says. First, his mother says Jeff’s attitude changed when they gave him his own stereo. This is when Owen talks about Jeff’s rock music problem in an interesting way. He uses the same language that someone would if they were talking to a parent that thought their child’s drug problem was a recent development.

Owen explains that kids identify so closely with their music that an attack on it, is an attack on them. True. He even says that it’s especially true when you don’t know anything about the music the kid is listening to. Keep that piece of advice in mind for the feature presentation final sermon of the film. But then he says that most parents aren’t knowledgable about rock music. Really? This came out in 1982. Is this film claiming children of the 1980’s were given birth by people who lived their lives prior to 1982 in caves? Of course they are because as everyone knows, when the 1980’s came, it became time to pretend that the 1960’s and 1970’s never happened.

IMG_9008

He says that Jeff could come up with scriptural evidence that she shouldn’t be watching soap operas. Then he actually gives her some good advice about parenting. It’s always a little weird when propaganda weaves in the good with the BS. The next line is the BS: “Rock music is one of the most difficult things a Christian young person must deal with.” Seriously?

IMG_9029

What about his girlfriend here? I think learning about safe sex or even abstinence is just wee bit more important than anything about rock music. Owen agrees to meet with Jeff.

IMG_9021

This part is really funny to me. Owen reminds Jeff of a conversation they had when Jeff came in to talk to Owen about his salvation a year prior. They don’t tell you till the very end of the movie, but this film was put together by Baptists. Baptists don’t baptize you till you are old enough to make that choice yourself. That’s probably why the title is the way it is.

After quoting a few lines from the bible, Owen asks Jeff if his music can be included in his life of glorifying Jesus Christ. Jeff asks how he knows where to draw the line between acceptable music and unacceptable music. Owen of course gives the Protestant response that the answer is in scripture. Keep that in mind during this film because you will never see Jeff consult scripture. Not once.

Then we get more BS from Owen: “Illicit sex, drugs, mocking God, the occult. Aren’t these things often found in rock music?” Jeff responds that not all rock music is like that. True. Then Owen says that some contemporary music wouldn’t fit in to any of those categories, but that they mainly are the exception. Really? So this says two things to me:

1. That means rock music only turned evil recently.
2. Owen is really ignorant of rock music and music as a whole.

Now comes the experiment. Owen tells Jeff to try and not listen to rock music for 2 weeks. During those 2 weeks he is supposed to do research on whether rock music has a place in his Christian life. Keep that in mind too because Jeff doesn’t do any research. He reads one book and then turns into a raving maniac. But back to the experiment.

This is where Owen gives him some music from his own personal collection. I know what you’re thinking, but no, we never hear the music that is supposedly safe. Now he tells him to research rock music to find his own conclusion. But then he says based on scripture, not an opinion. How can it be your own conclusion if it isn’t an opinion. Jeff doesn’t understand, so Owen explains that opinions change, but God’s word doesn’t cause the Old and New Testaments are exactly the same, right? Then he says that dedication and surrender apply to his music. Why? Why does he have to do and believe everything in the music he listens to? Isn’t he supposed to use his brain?

“Everyone goes through changes
Looking to find the truth
Don’t look at me for answers
Don’t ask me
I don’t know”

“You gotta believe in someone
Asking me who is right
Asking me who to follow
Don’t ask me
I don’t know”

“Nobody ever told me
I found out for myself”
-I Don’t Know by Ozzy Osbourne (1980)

Where to start the research? Well, Owen has some books. We only see one.

IMG_9032

That’s The Big Beat: A Rock Blast by Frank Garlock. I haven’t read it, but here’s a quote from it listed on Amazon.com.

“Yes, I believe that we can definitely conclude that rock ‘n roll is not only a symptom of the problems of teenagers in this generation but also a part of the cause. ‘You know a person by the company he keeps,’ the old saying goes; and, if any music has been guilty by association, it is rock music. It would be impossible to make a complete list, but here are a few of the ‘associates’ of rock: drug addicts, revolutionaries, rioters, Satan worshippers, drop-outs, draft-dodgers, homosexuals and other sex deviates, rebels, juvenile criminals, Black Panthers and White Panthers, motorcycle gangs, blasphemers, suicides; heathenism, voodooism, phallixism, Communism in the United States (Russia outlawed rock music around 1960), paganism, lesbianism, immorality, demonology, promiscuity, free love, free sex, disobedience (civil and uncivil), sodomy, venereal disease; discotheques, brothels, orgies of all kinds, night clubs, dives, strip joints, filthy musicals such as ‘Hair’ and ‘Uncle Meat’; and on and on the list could go almost indefinitely. Perhaps we should include in this list powerless Christianity, because churches and so-called Christian groups who have lost their spiritual power have adopted rock music as a way of reaching teenagers; but what a cheap substitute for spirituality it turns out to be.”

Didn’t think you were going to see another list like that after Law Enforcement Guide To Satanic Cults, did you? Honestly, you could probably go through every single one of those things and find that religion causes them as well. Just saying. My favorite parts are that apparently Black Panthers and White Panthers are listed there. I don’t think most people even know the White Panthers existed. They were an organization created with encouragement from the Black Panthers for white people who supported their cause. Their house band is one of the most important garage rock bands of the era. That being MC5. I can see how this could be very threatening.

“Yeah, but I can see the chickens coming home to roost
Young people everywhere are gonna cook their goose
Lots of kids are working to get rid of these blues
‘Cause everybody’s sick of the American ruse
-The American Ruse by MC5 (1970)

But back to the movie. Because the downward spiral begins now. Apparently, one reading of that book and your life is over. His girlfriend comes over to his place to ask if he got the tickets to the rock concert. She doesn’t say what concert, but since it’s 1982, I’m going to assume they were going to see Duran Duran. Of course they clash and she storms out threatening to go to the concert with someone else. So Jeff goes to bother his other friend Marty. Marty agrees to hear Jeff out.

IMG_9049

I was really hoping I would recognize the name of the band here, but that black tape just hides too much! This is where Jeff brings up that some rock groups are involved with the occult. Any examples, Jeff? Nope, he never gives an actual example of a group involved in the occult anywhere in the movie. Then he goes on to complain that the average age of a kid buying a KISS record is 12 years old. Well, the answer is simple. Satan needs to get those kids knighted early on. In all honesty, I’m sure that changed quickly when kids saw the video for Lick It Up.

IMG_9801

That’s terrifying!

However, Jeff does make one good point here and that’s if you don’t approve of the lifestyles of certain musicians, then don’t buy their music. But then he says “the record industry is pumping sex and Satanism into the minds of little children.” This is the same kind of us vs. them posturing that Law Enforcement Guide To Satanic Cults was all about. He also throws The Rolling Stone’s into the lot here.

Well, as you can guess, Jeff’s friend tells him to quit preaching to him and that people have a right to their own taste in music. So of course this means he’s the villain when we actually really want to root for this guy. Oh, also he knew the average age of a kid buying a KISS album was 12 years old because he talked to two clerks at a record store. Putting aside that that’s hardly a survey, that means Jeff went into a record store asking about what little kids are listening to. I bet Phil Phillips was in the toy store on his fast at that mall at the same time, but that’s Deception Of A Generation. I’ll get to that video eventually.

IMG_9057

Jeff’s girlfriend tries to reconcile, but they just clash again. Now Jeff has to confide in Owen once again. He tells him he went into a record store to ask some people about the music there, but they hassled him when they found out he was a Christian. That’s probably because Jeff opened up the conversation with the question “Do you know what kind of music you are buying?” But we don’t hear that part. We do see Jeff leaving the record store and the music playing nearly tempts him back, but he fights it and walks away. He says he felt like he was being controlled. To late to be worried about being controlled, that’s already a forgone conclusion, Jeff.

IMG_9070

Then the bomb drops. Owen was once a drummer in a band. He actually almost talks like he regrets that he had to give it up. I don’t know why? He could have joined a Christian metal band instead of taking the radical approach of rejecting all rock music. I just listened to Lightshine by Resurrection Band and it’s damn catchy, but with Christian lyrics. Well, with that little kick to keep Jeff on the path to crazy town, it’s time to go to a party!

Of course his friend Marty does the unthinkable and puts on rock music. I love that it has no lyrics, but is somehow evil anyways. This is when Jeff has his crisis of faith about a book he read that isn’t the bible and has nothing to do with Christianity. But first he listens to that rock song from the beginning that says “can’t walk on water…”

IMG_9103

I love the really moving music that kicks in here. He says he tried so hard. Seems like everything has gone wrong. He says he can’t fight everybody. He wants to glorify Jesus and everything. Even in his music.

Okay, he didn’t try at all actually. He never once looked in the bible which he was told was the be all and end all of where he should draw truth from. Everything went wrong because you went around treating people like garbage. Nobody, even Owen, asked you to fight everybody. You chose to pick fights with everyone yourself, Jeff. How about you glorify Jesus Christ by treating people with love rather than judgement. Nah! That would mean we don’t get the epic sermon. Before he does that, he goes back to the party and tries to tell his girlfriend how he is the one that has been mistreated.

———————-The Sermon———————-

IMG_9122

This is where we get told all the things wrong with rock music and he finally gets around to really naming names. I’ll try to take these point by point if I can:

  • He starts by comparing listening to rock music with shooting up heroin.
  • Then he says that the carnal part of him still likes rock music. That he can turn it on and his bad mood goes away. But then he says what about the spiritual part. This is where suddenly listening to music becomes something that supplants spirituality and a belief in Jesus Christ. The logic just doesn’t hold water here.
  • Now he goes on to say that rock is very pervasive and thus has somehow taken the place of the Holy Spirit in guiding your life. Although he never actually does say the Holy Spirit, but that’s what he means.
  • Then he does something hilarious. He says that at a rock concert people don’t sit quietly in their seats, but dance around so that means they are being controlled. Hate to break it to you Jeff, but that particular part of rock comes straight out of it’s Gospel roots.
  • Now he goes on to talk about lyrics in rock music. He surveyed some people who said they didn’t really care about the lyrics as long as the music was good. That’s true, but then he goes on to say that in singing along to these evil lyrics, they don’t have the mind of Christ. The main themes of rock are apparently sex and the occult. Jeff really needed a real musical education if he believed that.
  • Then Jeff declares that some are admitted homosexuals. That’s where any sympathy you might have for him goes out the window. If he was worried about the admitted homosexuals in 1982, then I’m guessing he didn’t survive the 1990s.
  • Then he goes on to talk about some of the perils of the rock lifestyle like drugs and lots of sex. Except he conveniently forgets that those things have nothing to do with the music itself. That kind of stuff is what happens whenever you give people loads of money, fame, and put enormous amounts of pressure on them. That’s a systemic problem with humanity, not exclusive to rock music nor avoidable by not listening to rock music.
  • Now he actually claims to have read something from the bible and quotes something that is just a list of things that are supposed to be bad.

Now we get names! Fun time!

  • One Of These Nights by The Eagles: His problem is that it’s a song about wanting a woman, which isn’t godly. So acknowledging the existence of sex is evil.

At this point he just starts listing song titles under the assumption that they clearly sound evil.

  • Sympathy For The Devil by The Rolling Stones: It’s a song about the atrocities committed by humankind.
  • Dancing with Mr. D by The Rolling Stones: I wasn’t familiar with this one before, but how exactly is the audience that he is preaching to going to connect that title with a song about Death or a succubus?
  • Devil’s Den by Jefferson Starship: I’m not going to pretend I completely get the meaning of the lyrics, but it’s clearly a metaphor and probably has to do with American capitalism. Hardly Satanic.
  • Dance with the Dragon by Jefferson Starship: It’s an anti-war song that references the Chinese New Year of the Dragon.
  • Evil Ways by Santana: The song basically just repeats the line “You’ve got to change your evil ways.” The only thing to complain about here is that the only sin the girl in the song committed was having a social life rather than staying home and cooking.
  • Soul Sacrifice by Santana: It’s an instrumental song so I don’t have the foggiest idea what is evil here.

Now comes AC/DC!

  • Rock ‘N’ Roll Damnation by AC/DC: It’s a song about the very kind of people who made this video. Also, about the problems of the rock and roll lifestyle.
  • Let There Be Rock by AC/DC: The only sin that I can see here is that they dared to refer to the birth of rock in creationist book of Genesis terms. I guess they should have talked about the evolution of rock instead of treating it like it was created.
  • Highway To Hell by AC/DC: A song about how it feels to be touring all the time and living your life on the road.
  • Hell Ain’t A Bad Place To Be by AC/DC: Metaphor, and it is about a shallow man who is taken advantage of by a woman.

Now he mentions KISS album names: Hotter Than Hell, Dressed To Kill, and Destroyer. Wow! Yep, those titles are just awful. No, I mean they’re not that great of titles and no kid, as he keeps mentioning listens to KISS, is going to care one bit about them. It’s only in Jeff’s head that 12 year olds take those titles to heart.

Now comes Captain & Tennille. He complains that even they have tried to change their image by doing songs like You Need A Woman Tonight and You Never Done It Like That. Yep, if your only exposure to Captain & Tennille is Love Will Keep Us Together, Disney Girls, and Muskrat Love, then yes those songs are a little different. Then again, they also covered Shop Around before those songs which is at least as suggestive as anything Jeff has mentioned. Also, Tennille worked with Elton John and is on Pink Floyd’s album The Wall.

Now he brings up Rod Stewart and shouts out the title Da Ya Think I’m Sexy. Then it’s Passion and Tonight’s The Night. Just more complaining about songs that have to do with sex.

Now he just says that if you buy albums with these songs on them, then you encourage them to make more of them. Congrats Jeff, you just figured out how economics works.

But he has to take one final crack at someone. This time it’s Barry Manilow’s Could It Be Magic. With all the examples out there, brining Manilow and Captain & Tennille into your argument makes you sound really crazy. Especially when your speech is supposed to be to teenagers your age. Do you really think that’s what they’re listening to, Jeff?

At this point, I had one question. How exactly did Billy Joel escape Jeff’s wrath. In 1977 he did a song called Only The Good Die Young which is about a guy trying to deflower a Catholic girl. And it did kick up a fair amount of controversy at the time. Billy Joel only got more popular afterwards. This would have fit the illicit sex, the against God, and Jeff’s argument that you should vote with your dollar when it comes to music. Oh, well.

Then it’s a little bit about how if we don’t stick out like sore thumbs and act differently from everyone else, then people won’t think they have to be Christians. His speech kind of sounds like a white supremacist calling for racial separation except swap out white for Christianity. Then he does this.

IMG_9154

After smashing a record, probably just Disco Duck, Jeff says he’s made his decision and asks us what ours is. So I can chose to be a raving bigoted fanatic who ceases to think and is just told what Jesus Christ wants me to do till I become old enough to tell younger people what God is telling them to do. Or, I can use my brain, be good to others, and live my life without having to be an awful person. In other words: I wanna rock!

Scenes That I Love: The Opening of Suspiria!


Today is not just Labor Day!

It’s also Dario Argento’s 75th birthday!  And what better way to celebrate the maestro‘s birthday than with a scene that I love?

The opening of Argento’s 1977 masterpiece, Suspiria, is about as perfect an opening as one could hope for.  American ballet student Suzy Banyon (Jessica Harper) arrives in Frieburg, Germany.  Both Argento and Harper perfectly portray Suzy’s confusion as she makes her way through the airport and, as torrential rain drenches her, attempts to hail a taxi and get a ride to the dance academy.  (What Suzy doesn’t know, of course, is that the dance academy is home to the ancient witch known as Our Mother of Sighs.)  With this opening scene, Argento both immediately establishes the off-center, nightmarish atmosphere of Suspiria and establishes Suzy as a character who we, as the audience, relate to and care about.  Suspiria is a great film and it all begins with this brilliant opening.

Happy birthday, Dario!

Lisa Reviews An Oscar Nominee For Labor Day: Norma Rae (directed by Martin Ritt)


Earlier, in honor of Labor Day, I reviewed one of the most anti-labor union films ever made, the 1954 Oscar winner On The Waterfront.  In the interest of fairness, it only seems right to now take a look at one of the most pro-union films ever made, the 1979 best picture nominee Norma Rae.

Norma Rae takes place in one of those small Southern towns that is defined by just one industry.  In this case, almost everyone in town works for minimum wage at the local textile mill.  Conditions are terrible, with the employees working long and brutal shifts in a hot and poorly ventilated factory.  The overwhelming roar of the machines have left the majority of the workers deaf to reality, both figuratively and literally.  The mill is run by the usual collection of slow-talking, tie-wearing rednecks who always seem to show up in movies like this.

One day, a union organizer from New York shows up in town.  Brash and cocky, Ruben Warshowsky (Ron Leibman) is determined to unionize the mill but, at first, he struggles.  Nobody wants to risk their job by being seen with him and his Yankee manners rub many of the townspeople the wrong way.

Eventually, Ruben does find one ally.  Norma Rae (Sally Field) has worked at the mill her entire life.  She’s tough and determined but she’s also regularly shunned because of her past.  A widow who has three children (“She’s had a child out of wedlock!” a judgmental union organizer tells Ruben in a near panic), Norma channels her frustration into drinking too much and having an affair with a married (and abusive) salesman.

Two things happen that give Norma Rae a new purpose in life.  First off, she meets and marries the well-meaning but chauvinistic Sonny (Beau Bridges).  Secondly, she helps Ruben in his efforts to unionize the plant, even at the risk of going to jail and losing her job.   With the mill’s management spreading untrue rumors about Norma’s relationship with Ruben, her dedication to the union soon starts to threaten her marriage to Sonny.

I have to admit that I have mixed feelings about Norma Rae.  In many ways, Ruben is an annoying character.  He’s so brash and so smugly out-of-place that I actually found it difficult to consider any of the points that he was making.  I suppose that was partly intentional.  Ruben can’t accomplish anything until he gets Norma Rae on his side.  But, at the same time, there was something very condescending about Ruben as a character.  Much like the villainous rednecks in charge of the mill, Ruben felt like a stock character.  He was Super Yankee, bravely venturing below the Mason-Dixon Line to bring the truth to all of us stupid Southerners.  Whenever Ruben smirked and started to complain about how dumb everyone else was, I was reminded of why I never wanted much to do with the whole Occupy Movement.

As well, Norma Rae is one of those films that technically takes place in the South but it’s the South of the Northern imagination.  The accents were inconsistent and the dialogue often tried way too hard to sound “authentic.”  Ultimately, Norma Rae lacked the artistry necessary to disguise its more heavy-handed moments.

And yet, I still liked Norma Rae.  It had nothing to do with the film’s political message and everything to do with the character of Norma Rae.  Sally Field gives such a good performance as Norma, making her both strong and vulnerable.  The film’s best moments are the ones where Norma stands up for herself and does what she feels is right, despite the opposition from the mill’s management, Sonny, and her father (Pat Hingle).  Towards the end of the film, there’s a simply incredible scene where Norma finally tells her children about her past and, at that moment, Norma Rae reveals itself to be a great and heartfelt tribute to the strength and resilience of women everywhere.  At that moment, Norma’s strength reminded me of the greatest woman that I’ve ever known, my mom.  It made me appreciate the struggles that my mom went through as she raised four strong-willed daughters on her own, while working crappy jobs and dealing with a society that is always threatened by and cruelly judges a woman who refuses to settle.  Personally, I think Norma could have done better than Sonny and that Ruben should have been called out for constantly talking to down to her but what’s important, in the end, is that Norma never stopped standing up for what she believed.  By the end of the film, Norma is standing in for every woman who has ever been underestimated or judged or told that her opinions didn’t matter.  Norma is standing up for all of us.

Sally Field won an Oscar for her role in Norma Rae.  Off the top of my head, I have no idea who she defeated for the award.  (Yes, I know that I could just look it up on wikipedia but that’s not the point.)  But, regardless of her competition, it’s an honor that she definitely deserved.

Norma Rae

Lisa Marie Reviews An Oscar Winner For Labor Day: On The Waterfront (dir by Elia Kazan)


On-the-Waterfront

I like On The Waterfront.

Nowadays, that can be a dangerous thing to admit.  On The Waterfront won the Oscar for Best Picture of 1954 and Marlon Brando’s lead performance as boxer-turned-dockworker Terry Malloy is still regularly cited as one of the best of all time.  The scene where he tells his brother (played by Rod Steiger) that he “could have been a contender” is so iconic that other films still continue to either parody or pay homage to it.  On The Waterfront is one of those films that regularly shows up on TCM and on lists of the greatest films ever made.

And yet, despite all that, it’s become fashionable to criticize On The Waterfront or to cite it as an unworthy Oscar winner.  Certain film bloggers wear their disdain for On The Waterfront like a badge of honor.  Ask them and they’ll spend hours telling you exactly why they dislike On The Waterfront and, not surprisingly, it all gets tedious pretty quickly.

Like all tedious things, the answer ultimately comes down to politics.  In the early 50s, as the House UnAmerican Affairs Committee conducted its search for communists in Hollywood, hundreds of actors, writers, and directors were called before the committee.  They were asked if they were currently or ever had been a member of the Communist Party.  It was demanded that they name names.  Refusing to take part was career suicide and yet, many witnesses did just that.  They refused to testify, apologize, or name names.

And then there was the case of Elia Kazan.  When he was called in front of HUAC, he not only testified about his communist past but he named names as well.  Many of his past associates felt that Kazan had betrayed them in order to protect his own career.  On The Waterfront was Kazan’s answer to his critics.

In On The Waterfront, Terry Malloy’s dilemma is whether or not to voluntarily testify before a commission that is investigating union corruption on the waterfront.  Encouraging him to testify is the crusading priest, Father Barry (Karl Malden), and Edie (Eva Marie Saint), the saintly girl who Terry loves.  Discouraging Terry from testifying is literally every one else on the waterfront, including Terry’s brother, Charlie (Rod Steiger).  Charlie is the right-hand man of gangster Johnny Friendly (a crudely intimidating Lee J. Cobb), who is the same man who earlier ordered Terry to throw a big fight.

At first, Terry is content to follow the waterfront of code of playing “D and D” (deaf and dumb) when it comes to union corruption.  However, when Johnny uses Terry to lure Edie’s brother into an ambush, Terry is forced to reconsider his previous apathy.  As Terry gets closer and closer to deciding to testify, Johnny order Charlie to kill his brother…

The issue that many contemporary critics have with On The Waterfront is that they view it as being essentially a “pro-snitch” film.  It’s easy to see that Elia Kazan viewed himself as being the damaged but noble Terry Malloy while Johnny Friendly was meant to be a stand-in for Hollywood communism.  They see the film as being both anti-union and Kazan’s attempt to defend naming names.

And maybe they’re right.

But, ultimately, that doesn’t make the film any less effective.  Judging On The Waterfront solely by its backstory ignores just how well-made, well-acted, well-photographed, well-directed, and well-written this film truly is.  Elia Kazan may (or may not) have been a lousy human being but, watching this film, you can’t deny his skill as a director.  There’s a thrilling grittiness to the film’s style that allows it to feel authentic even when it’s being totally heavy-handed.

And the performances hold up amazingly well.  Marlon Brando’s performance as Terry Malloy gets so much attention that it’s easy to forget that the entire cast is just as great.  Rod Steiger makes Charlie’s regret and guilt poignantly real.  Karl Malden, who gets stuck with the film’s more pedantic dialogue, is the perfect crusader.  Eva Marie Saint is beautiful and saintly.  And then you’ve got Lee J. Cobb, playing one of the great screen villains.

The motives behind On The Waterfront may not be the best.  But, occasionally, a great film does emerge from less than pure motives.  (Just as often, truly good intentions lead to truly bad cinema.)  Regardless of what one thinks of Elia Kazan, On The Waterfront is a great work of cinema and it’s on that basis that it should be judged.

On_the_Waterfront_poster