Trash Film Guru Vs. The Summer Blockbusters : “Jurassic World”


jurassic-world-own-raptors-poster

“Everything old is new again.”

How many times have you heard that one? Well, in the case of the just-released (and record-setting in terms of its worldwide box office take) Jurassic World, it turns out that tired old adage is actually quite true, since director Colin Trevorrow has chosen to hew pretty closely to Steven Spielberg’s original model for this fourth installment in the previously-presumed- moribund franchise extrapolated from the works of Michael Crichton. There’s certainly nothing happening here that one could call overtly “new,” per se, but gosh — it’s been so long since Jurassic Park III  that it all just sorta feels new, ya know?

DLC00020-720x405

CGI technology has come a long way since the original Jurassic Park  made its debut in 1993, as well, and that’s a big factor — maybe even the biggest factor — in this new flick’s by-popcorn-movie-standards “success,” but don’t think that means I’m damning Jurassic World with faint praise. Truth be told, we just got back from seeing it in Imax 3-D and it’s got pretty much everything you’d ever want in a brainless summer thrill ride : superb effects, likable leads, drama, suspense, tension-cutting humor, nicely despicable (sorry, does that even make sense?) villains, and mile-a-minute thrills. My wife and I both left the theater smiling and I ain’t ashamed to admit it.

My only real gripe is one that I knew I’d have going in — Jurassic World continues the morally-questionable trend established at the series’ outset of using kids placed in danger (in this case brothers Zach and Gray, played by Nick Robinson and Ty Simpkins, respectively) as its primary focus/narrative crutch, with benevolent adults coming in to save the day (here represented by Chris Pratt’s  “dinosaur wrangler” character Owen, and Bryce Dallas Howard — who, goddamit, Hollywood is bound and determined to make a star out of yet! — as their hitherto- inattentive aunt Claire, who’s one of the park’s big-wigs), and I’m sorry, but if you don’t know why that scenario is inherently creepy to some of us, then you haven’t been paying much attention to the some of the uglier and more salacious rumors about Spielberg’s personal life that have been swirling around for decades now. And that I won’t repeat here. So let’s just move on, shall we?

ydln1orxqd4neeasuboo

In any case, that solitary-but-predictable qualm aside, the fact of the matter is that Jurassic World is expertly-crafted throwaway fun. Not every movie needs to re-invent the wheel to stand out, and Trevorrow wisely has that figured from the outset here. All we want from his big-budget extravaganza is pretty much the same sort of story that had us jumping in our seats all those years ago, and to feel the same sort of “rush of excitement” that we did back then and which the two previous installments in the series just weren’t able to capture. It’s a dinosaur movie, for Christ’s sake, so just give us a shit-load of dinos on the loose and we’re gonna be happy! How hard is that to figure out?

jurassic-world-pratt-howard

About the only  wrinkles to the formula here are the introduction of the new genetically-engineered “super-dinosaur” Indominus Rex, and the hare-brained scheme laid out by the villainous Hoskins (Vincent D’Onofrio) to train Velociraptors to be — uhhmmm — super-soldiers for the US army. But rich people with more money than sense employing unscrupulous lackeys and amoral scientists have been a Jurassic staple, in one form or another, from jump, and one might even argue that really smart people doing really dumb things has always been at the heart of these flicks. That’s okay with me if the end result is admittedly disposable fare done with this much gusto, flair, and panache. There are a million and one reasons to write off Jurassic World as derivative, senseless garbage,  sure — but when you’ve got five or six bloodthirsty dinosaurs battling it out for supremacy at the end, I don’t care about any of those intellectual (or, as is more often the case, pseudo-intellectual) arguments. I’m just having a damn good time.

25 responses to “Trash Film Guru Vs. The Summer Blockbusters : “Jurassic World”

  1. I think the movie itself nailed it on the head…people want more, bigger, better, scarier dinosaurs. It was ok if you want a relaxed fun turn your brain off movie but there is no wow factor there anymore. The hero/jaded girl Indiana Jones schtick wasn’t the best with lots of plot holes if I wanted to actually go there but I went for a no brainer fun movie. My 10 year old son loved it though, so really that’s all that matters to this CGI been there done that got the tshirt Dad.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Trevorrow figured out the best way to make a fitting sequel was to pay homage to the original and copy whole sequences. I didn’t mind a bit with the rousing score in the background and looking out for all the Easter Eggs I thought it was a tremendous celebration of the original. Really enjoyed it.

    Like

  3. Pingback: 6 Reviews To Help Lisa Get Caught Up: Ant-Man, Cinderella, Jurassic World, Magic Mike XXL, The Man From UNCLE, Terminator: Genisys | Through the Shattered Lens

  4. Pingback: Horror on TV: The Twilight Zone 2.18 “The Odyssey of Flight 33” | Through the Shattered Lens

  5. Pingback: Here Are The Winners of The 2015 Hollywood Film Awards, Whatever The Hell Those Are. | Through the Shattered Lens

  6. Pingback: For Whatever They’re Worth, Here are The Satellite Awards Nominees! | Through the Shattered Lens

  7. Pingback: Jurassic World | He Said, She Said Movie Posters

  8. Pingback: Here’s The Best Visual Effects Shortlist! | Through the Shattered Lens

  9. Pingback: Here Are The Very Confusing SAG Nominations! | Through the Shattered Lens

  10. Pingback: Here Are The Confusing San Diego Film Critics Society Nominations! | Through the Shattered Lens

  11. Pingback: Mad Max: Fury Road dominates the 21st Annual Critics Choice Nominations! | Through the Shattered Lens

  12. Pingback: The Las Vegas Film Critics Announces A Huge Amount of Nominations! | Through the Shattered Lens

  13. Pingback: Remember Suffragette? The Women’s Film Critics Circle Certainly Does! | Through the Shattered Lens

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.