This October, I’m going to be doing something a little bit different with my contribution to 4 Shots From 4 Films. I’m going to be taking a little chronological tour of the history of horror cinema, moving from decade to decade.
Today, we reach the end of the 50s and the rise of British horror.
4 Shots From 4 Horror Films
Night of the Demon (1957, dir by Jacques Tourneur)
The Curse of Frankenstein (1957, dir by Terence Fisher)
1974’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula opens with a familiar sight.
British solicitor Jonathan Harker (Murray Brown) is in Transylvania, where he has an appointment with a mysterious man named Dracula. The local villagers are superstitious and seem to be frightened of Dracula’s very name. When Harker reaches Dracula’s castle, he discovers that Dracula (Jack Palance) is a courtly but enigmatic man. When Dracula sees a photograph of Jonathan’s fiancée, Mina, and her best friend, Lucy, something about it seems to capture his attention. Later, that night, Jonathan is attacked by several female vampires. After Dracula saves Jonathan’s life, he forced Jonathan to write a letter home, saying that he will be staying in Transylvania for month. Jonathan attempts to escape but is instead dragged off to the crypt, where Dracula’s brides await….
Soon, Dracula is in England. Lucy (Fiona Lewis), who looks exactly like Dracula’s long-dead wife, is taken mysteriously ill and dies. Dr. Abraham Van Helsing (Nigel Davenport), called in when Lucy was showed signs of being sick, suspects that there is a vampire at work. Lucky’s fiancé, Arthur Holmwood (Simon Ward), doesn’t believe it until he sees, with his own eyes, Lucy raised from the dead and calling for him to come and join her….
Not to be confused with the Francis Ford Coppola film, 1974’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula was directed by horror impresario Dan Curtis. It’s a rather loose adaptation of Bram Stoker’s novel. For one thing, Jonathan Harker does not return to England. Dracula is, from the start, more interested in Lucy than in Mina. Lucy’s other suitors — Quincy Morris, John Seward — are not present. And Dracula himself does not get younger as the result of drinking blood. In fact, it’s such a loose adaptation that it’s actually difficult to justify calling it Bram Stoker’sDracula. (In fact, the film is also known as Dan Curtis’s Dracula, which is a far more appropriate title.)
That said, it’s still an entertaining vampire movie. Jack Palance, who previously worked with Dan Curtis in The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, gives a properly intense performance as Dracula. He doesn’t try to adopt any sort of Eastern European accent or anything like that. Instead, he delivers his lines through clenched teeth (or, perhaps, fangs) and he fixes his victims with a powerful stare that hints at the animalistic urges behind his controlled demeanor. Palance plays Dracula as being arrogant and convinced that no mere mortal can defeat him. At the same time, there’s a vulnerability to Palance’s Dracula. Watch how his face briefly lights up when he sees Lucy’s picture and is reminded of his long-dead wife. Watch his fury when he discovers that Van Helsing and Arthur have gotten to Lucy before him. His love for his wife is the one shred of humanity that Dracula still has within him. When he loses her a second time (in the form of Lucy), he’s prepared to go to war.
Bram Stoker’s Dracula was originally meant to air in October of 1973 but the showing was pre-empted by the announcement that Vice President Spiro Agnew had resigned. As a result, this film — so clearly meant for Halloween — did not air until February of 1974. That doesn’t seem fair. Poor Dracula.
First released in 1968, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a somewhat loose adaptation of the famous novella by Robert Louis Stevenson.
Jack Palance stars as Dr. Henry Jekyll, a mild-mannered and respected doctor who lives in Victorian-era London and who is convinced that there is a good and dark side lurking in every single person. The dark side is what forces people to break the law and fight with each other. Jekyll feels that his experiments will allow people to get closer to their dark side and, in doing so, defeat it. When Dr. Jekyll explains his theories to a medical association, he is violently jeered and booed. Jekyll returns to his home, enters his laboratory, and takes a drink of the serum that he’s been developing.
The next morning, Dr. Jekyll wakes up with a hangover and no memory of how he spent the previous night. Trying to retrace his steps, Jekyll finds himself in a dance hall where everyone is talking about a well-dressed but ugly man named Edward Hyde. Hyde showed up the previous night, spent a lot of money on a woman named Gwyn (Billie Whitelaw), and then got into a fight with two men. Hyde broke a window to make his escape. Jekyll, sensing what must have happened, pays for the window on behalf of his “friend,” Edward Hyde.
Jekyll continues to drink the serum and he continues to indulge in all of the forbidden vices as Edward Hyde. Eventually, we get to see Palance as Hyde. Unlike a lot of other actors who have played the role, Palance uses a minimum of makeup to suggest his transformation. Instead, he hunches over, scrunches up his face, and he has a unibrow. One of the stranger things about this production is that we are continually told that Hyde looks nothing like Jekyll but we know that’s not true. Instead, Hyde looks exactly like Jekyll making a funny face.
Palance gives one of his more eccentric performances as Jekyll and Hyde. Somewhat surprisingly, he’s far more convincing as the kindly and troubled Dr. Jekyll than as the villainous Mr. Hyde. (As Hyde, Palance is often trying to so hard to maintain his facial paralysis that it’s hard to understand exactly what it is that he’s saying.) With each drink of the serum, Jekyll becomes a bit more confident in himself. However, he also finds himself losing the ability to control the transformations. One morning, he wakes up in his bed and is shocked to discover that he is still Hyde. That same morning, he learns that Hyde is suspected of committing a senseless and brutal murder. Jekyll has no memory of it but he knows that Hyde is guilty. And if Hyde is guilty, so is Jekyll. (Those who make the argument that Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is ultimately about drug addiction will find plenty to back up that argument in this production,) Jekyll’s anguish as he realizes what he has become is rather poignant to watch.
Produced by horror impresario Dan Curtis, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde can seem a bit creaky today. It was apparently highly acclaimed when it first aired but, seen today, it can feel rather stagey and talky. That said, the film has a strong supporting cast, with Denholm Elliott especially giving a good performance as Jekyll’s best friend. Jack Palance’s performance is so bizarre that it transcends the usual standards used to determine good and bad. It’s definitely a film worth watching.
For today’s horror on the lens, how about a little werwolf action?
In the 1974 made-for-TV movie, Scream of the Wolf, Peter Graves is a writer who is asked to help solve a series of mysterious murders. The fact that both human footprints and wolf tracks have been found at each murder scene has led some people to assume that the killer must be a werewolf! Will Graves be able to prove them wrong or will it turn out that they are right? Graves calls in a famous hunter (Clint Walker) to help track down the killer but it turns out that the hunter has secrets of his own.
Scream of the Wolf features a screenplay from Richard Matheson and it was directed by television horror specialist, Dan Curtis. It feels like it was probably meant to be a pilot in which Peter Graves would deal with a supernatural mystery on a weekly basis. Even if the movie didn’t lead to a series, it’s still enjoyably atmospheric.
2015’s FaithOfOurFathers tells the story of a road trip to Washington, D.C.
John (Kevin Downes) and Wayne (David A.R. White) might not seem to have much in common. John is uptight and neurotic, on the verge of getting married but feeling like he has to do one final thing while his fiancée (Candace Cameron Bure) plans their wedding. Wayne is a proud redneck, someone who lives in a trailer and enjoys picking fights. When John first shows up at the trailer, Wayne shoots a shotgun at him. When John refuses to leave, Wayne eventually allows him into the trailer and the two of them talk.
They are linked by their fathers, who both served and bonded in Vietnam. Through flashbacks, we see how John’s father (Sean McGowan) found strength from his religious faith and how Wayne’s father (Scott Whyte, who viewers of a certain age will recognize from CityGuys) eventually set aside his cynicism. Wayne is in possession of the letters that his father wrote home from Vietnam and John, feeling a need to know who his father was, wants to read those letters. Wayne agrees to show John the letters if he drives Wayne to Washington D.C. so that they can visit the Vietnam War memorial.
Along the way, the two of them bicker, bond, and have adventures. This is a road film, which means that it has to take a while for John and Wayne to stop arguing with each other and start to open up about their pasts and their views on the modern world. They meet a wide variety of people while on their trip, some of whom are trustworthy and many of whom are not. They also meet Mansfield (Stephen Baldwin), who served in Vietnam with their fathers and who offers up some details about what happened to the men while they were serving in the military.
Unfortunately, the film itself doesn’t really work. It has all of the flaws that one typically associates with a faith-based filmmaking. The budget is noticeably low, something that especially becomes an issue during the Vietnam flashbacks. The dialogue is often didactic. Downes and White are familiar faces when it comes to faith-based films and they’ve both given good performances in other films but they both feel miscast here. As played by Downes, John is a bit too neurotic to be believable (or particularly sympathetic) while White’s earnest and, at times, goofy style of performing feels wrong for a character who is supposed to be into random fights and beer. For someone whose career has largely become about appearing in faith-based films, Stephen Baldwin seems rather detached throughout FaithofourFathers. In the flashbacks, he’s one of the least convincing commanding officers that I’ve ever seen in a war film. In the modern scenes, he just seems bored. If I’m being hard on Baldwin, it’s because I’ve seen him give really good performances in other films. Knowing that he could be giving a good performance makes his bad performances all the more frustrating.
I will say this, though. FaithofOurFathers takes a stand for supporting our veterans, both when they’re serving and after they’ve come home. I appreciated that. All too often, we seem to hold the unpopular wars against those who served, as if the mistakes of those in command are somehow their fault. That happened with Vietnam and it’s happening right now with Iraq and Afghanistan. No one should ever be forgotten or deserted by their own country.
Welcome to Late Night Retro Television Reviews, a feature where we review some of our favorite and least favorite shows of the past! On Mondays, I will be reviewing CHiPs, which ran on NBC from 1977 to 1983. The entire show is currently streaming on Prime!
This week, there’s a new cop on the beat!
Episode 4.17 “New Guy In Town”
(Dir by Arnold Laven, originally aired on March 15th, 1981)
Ponch is upset because the new rookie on the team, T.C. Hunsacker (Joseph Hacker), is just too perfect. He’s still on probation but he’s already good at his job. He’s a professional. He’s got a good sense of humor. He’s a good bowler. He’s as comfortable talking about classical music as he is talking about cars. He’s not arrogant. He’s nice to everyone. Everyone likes him. Ponch cannot stand that TC doesn’t seem to have a flaw.
Yeah, Ponch, it’s kind of annoying when someone knows everything and can do anything, isn’t it? Seriously, who does this Hunsacker fellow think he is when we all know that this is….
Ponch has other things to be concerned about, though. Martin Beck (Chris Connelly) and Lina Beck (Jenny O’Hara), the brother and wife of someone who died while being chased by Ponch and Baker, are determined to get revenge by killing both of them. Baker is nearly taken out in a hit-and-run. Ponch nearly gets blown up in his car. Fortunately, TC was there to tell Ponch not turn the key in the ignition. TC noticed some wires on the ground and immediately realized there was a bomb in Ponch’s engine….
Wow, is there nothing TC cant do!?
I really am starting to see Ponch’s point. TC really is too good to be true. According to the imdb, this was the only episode in which he appeared. I know that Larry Wilcox and Erik Estrada apparently were not getting along during the filming of CHiPs and that Wilcox was threatening to leave the show because he thought the producers favored Estrada over him. Maybe this episode was meant to set up Hunsacker as a possible replacement in case Wilcox did leave. That’s really the only reason I can think of for this show to have devoted so much time to a character who has never been seen before and who, apparently, will never be seen again.
The focus on TC made this an uneven episode but there were a few good chase scenes and a slow-motion van crash. And really, that’s all that one can really ask from this show. An exciting chase can make up for a lot!
For tonight’s horror on television, we have the 11th episode of Hammer House of Horror! This atmospheric episode features Kathryn Leigh Scott as a woman who fears that she is being haunted by the ghost of a would-be rapist that she earlier killed. Simon MacCorkindale plays her husband, who has secret of his own.
This episode originally aired on November 22nd, 1980.
In this 2014 shocker, a young couple moves into what seems like a perfect 2 bedroom, 1 bath apartment. Rachel (Michele Hooks) and Kevin (Andrew W. Walker) are hoping to start a family in their new apartment. Their landlady (Dee Wallace) is very happy to hear that. In fact, it’s hard not to feel that she’s a bit too happy to hear it….
In many ways, 2 Bedroom 1 Bath is a typical “is it haunted or not?” thriller. From the minute that they move into the apartment, Kevin starts to have strange and nightmarish visions. He imagines himself trying to pick up a baby, just for it to fall to the ground and shatter like a doll. Dark shadows move in the background while pale faces are reflected in the windows. After taking a shower, Rachel doesn’t notice that ghostly figure in the mirror behind her. Things get creepier and stranger after Rachel gets pregnant and Kevin finds himself not only tempted by student but also taunted by mysterious messages that appear in the mail box.
It’s a bit predictable but Hooks and Walker both give strong performances and director Stanley Yung does a great job of creating an ominous and dream-like atmosphere. This is a film that features several dozen jump scares and just about everyone of them is effective. It’s an effective piece of haunted apartment horror.
As for Eric Roberts, his role is a small one. He plays the fertility specialist and he has three scenes with Rachel and Kevin. When Roberts first appeared, I assumed his character was going to be revealed to be a part of the supernatural conspiracy but no. He was just a well-intentioned doctor with two patients who had no idea how much trouble they were about to face. To be honest, I’m so used to seeing Eric Roberts playing villains that it was kind of nice to see him playing a sympathetic professional for once.
Previous Eric Roberts Films That We Have Reviewed:
In the 1979 made-for-TV movie, MindoverMurder, Deborah Raffin stars as Suzy.
Suzy is a model and an actress. She has a nice apartment, which she shares with her football-loving boyfriend, Ben (Bruce Davison). She has a best friend (Penelope Willis), who is constantly looking to get laid. Her latest job requires her to dance with a man who is dressed up like a giant hamburger. It would seem that, by the standards of 1979, Suzy has the perfect life.
However, her life is turned upside down when she suddenly starts having visions. All of the action around her will either switch to slow motion or stop altogether while Suzy has a vision of a scary-looking bald man (Andrew Prine) stalking her. Her most disturbing vision involves Suzy hearing the sound of a pilot begging for help while his airplane crashes. Ben tells her that she’s probably just working too hard but, the next morning, Suzy looks at a newspaper and immediately sees a headline about a plane crash.
With Ben dismissing her concerns, Suzy takes it upon herself to meet with the two detectives (David Ackroyd and Robert Englund — yes, Robert Englund!) investigating the plane crash. They are surprisingly sympathetic to Suzy’s story of hearing the plane crash before it happened. They arrange for her to meet a psychic researcher, who explains that Suzy must have some sort of mental connection to whoever was responsible for the crash. While Ben continues to be skeptical and jealous of all the time that she’s spending with one of the detectives, Suzy keeping having disturbing visions of the bald man….
Considering its origins as a made-for-TV movie, MindOverMurder is a surprisingly frightening film. This is a film that proves that slow motion can make just about anything creepy and Deborah Raffin does a good job of showing us just how much Suzy dreads those moments when everything starts to slow down and she realizes that she’s about to get hit with another vision. That said, what truly makes this film frightening is the performance of Andrew Prine, who plays the bald man as being every woman’s nightmare. He’s a misogynist, the type who is convinced that every woman should be in love with him and that those who aren’t should be punished. Whether he’s appearing in Suzy’s visions or stepping into her reality, Andrew Prine is never less than terrifying.
Along with featuring a scary performance from Prine, this film also features a genuinely likable one from Robert Englund. Englund is playing a nice guy here. In fact, before he made horror history in A Nightmare in Elm Street, Englund almost always played nice guys. It’s interesting to watch him here, with his friendly manner and his polite style, and to imagine the roles Englund would have ended up playing if he hadn’t gotten typecast as a horribly scarred serial killer.
The first hour of MindoverMurder is brilliant. The final 30 minutes, unfortunately, find the film turning into a far more conventional thriller, as Suzy’s visions are replaced by the Bald Man actually coming after her. That said, this is still an effective horror thriller and one that deserves to be rediscovered this Halloween season.
Welcome to Retro Television Reviews, a feature where we review some of our favorite and least favorite shows of the past! On Mondays, I will be reviewing Miami Vice, which ran on NBC from 1984 to 1989. The entire show can be purchased on Prime!
This week, Sonny Burnett continues his reign of terror!
Episode 5.2 “Redemption in Blood”
(DIr by Paul Krasny, originally aired on November 11th, 1988)
When last we checked in with Miami Vice, Sonny thought he was a drug lord named Sonny Burnett and he was firing his gun at Tubbs, who he had just recognized as a cop. This episode reveals that Sonny didn’t shoot Tubbs. Instead, he aimed at a wall, firing while Tubbs made his escape.
Working with the psychotic Cliff King (Matt Frewer), Sonny takes over his late boss’s drug empire and continue to fight a war against El Gato (Jon Polito). El Gato is meant to be a “flamboyant” drug dealer, which is a polite way of saying that Polito overacts through the entire episode.
The show hedges its bets by having Cliff commit all of the murders while Sonny rises to power. In fact, when Sonny catches Cliff torturing two of El Gato’s men, Sonny orders Cliff to stop and then offers them jobs in the Burnett operation. Amazingly, over the course of the entire three-episode Burnett arc, Sonny manages to get through the whole thing only killing people in self-defense. Even the cop that he killed at the end of the previous season was a dirty cop who had been sent to kill him. I get that the show couldn’t take Sonny totally over to the dark side but it’s still hard to believe that Burnett took over the Miami underworld without getting his hands a bit more dirty than he did.
A car bomb (courtesy of El Gato) knocks Sonny unconscious and, when he wakes up, he suddenly starts to remember who he actually is. Finally realizing that his name is Crockett, Sonny turns himself into the Vice Squad and is promptly arrested while Kate Bush sings, “Don’t give up.” Sonny tells Castillo, Switek, and Tubbs that he’s ready to acccept the consequences of whatever he did during his previous bout of amnesia. But then Sonny escapes custody and sets up both Cliff and El Gato for a great fall so I guess he wasn’t totally ready to turn himself in and head off to prison.
Tubbs, who now trusts Sonny, helps him take out Cliff King and the Burnett organization. Sonny shoots Cliff to save Tubbs. With Tubbs dangling off of a walkway, Sonny pulls him back up to safety. Sonny then goes back to his mansion where he and his girlfriend (Debra Feuer) are taking hostage by a gun-wielding El Gato. “Where is the safe?” El Gato demands. Sonny tricks El Gato into thinking the safe is in the room where he keeps his pet panther. (Apparently, all drug lords were given either a tiger, a panther, a cheetah, or a leopard.) El Gato gets mauled to death as the episode ends.
This episode suggests that Sonny is going to be let off the hook because he finally remembered he was. I don’t really think that it would really work like that. Sonny has multiple warrants out and he also killed a cop, albeit a corrupt one. If Sonny isn’t on trial in next week’s episode, I’m going to be a little annoyed.
This episode ended the Burnett trilogy about as well as it could be ended. The idea that all Sonny needed was to survive a second near-fatal explosion made me smile. What if El Gato hadn’t tried to blow him up? I guess it’s a good thing that he did! While Polito went overboard, Matt Frewer gave a very good performance as the villainous Cliff King. It’s a bit of a shame that he died so dramatically because Cliff would have made a good recurring villain.
This episode was definitely better than anything from season 4. It’ll be interesting to see how the rest of season 5 plays out.
