Review: Wake Up Dead Man (dir. by Rian Johnson)


“Grace isn’t cheap. It’s bought with blood and fire, not your weak-kneed handshakes with sin.” Monsignor Jefferson Wicks

Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery is Rian Johnson’s latest entry in his whodunit series. It reunites Daniel Craig with his charismatic detective Benoit Blanc. The film trades the intimate family drama of the first movie and the over-the-top glamour of the second for a tense, small-town tale of faith, secrets, and an impossible crime at a rural church. It’s an ambitious evolution. Yet it doesn’t always land every punch in the trilogy.

To appreciate where this fits, glance back at the predecessors. The original Knives Out from 2019 burst onto the scene. It updated classic mystery tropes cleverly. The story centered on the death of a wealthy author. The dysfunctional Thrombey family circled like vultures over his estate. Blanc’s folksy charm cut through the lies with surgical precision. He delivered razor-sharp twists. His commentary bit into privilege and entitlement. All this wrapped in a snug, stage-play setup. It felt like a modern And Then There Were None. Every character popped—from Chris Evans’ smirking man-child to Ana de Armas’ wide-eyed nurse. The script’s misdirections kept you guessing until the final gut-punch reveal. It was tight, surprising, and endlessly rewatchable. Humor, heart, and social satire blended into a perfect whodunit package.

Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery followed in 2022. It cranked up the scale dramatically. A billionaire’s private island became the playground. A squad of self-important influencers played at being geniuses. The satire shifted gears. It skewered tech elites and performative allyship. Bigger laughs came from set pieces like the glass onion puzzle. Wilder ensemble clashes featured Edward Norton’s bumbling Miles Bron. Blanc unraveled the chaos with gleeful theatricality. Sure, it leaned heavier into farce than the original’s grounded tension. But those oh-so-satisfying reveals kept the momentum roaring. Janelle Monáe’s layered turn helped too. Each film stands alone as a self-contained puzzle. Yet they build Blanc’s legend incrementally. They refresh the murder-mystery playbook. Johnson’s signature flair nods to Agatha Christie roots.

Wake Up Dead Man arrives a few years after those events. Blanc looks more rumpled—bearded and brooding. He carries the visible weight of prior investigations. These have chipped away at his unflappable facade. Detective Benoit Blanc dives into a fresh case. It orbits a magnetic priest, Monsignor Jefferson Wicks. His tight-knit parish sits at Our Lady of Perpetual Fortitude. This is a fading rural church in snow-dusted upstate New York. A baffling death strikes right in the middle of services. It’s a stabbing during a Good Friday ritual. The congregation watches it unfold. It’s framed as an impossible crime with no clear entry or escape. Blanc must sift through hidden motives. He navigates frayed bonds and simmering tensions in the flock. His goal is to expose the culprit. Young assistant priest Rev. Jud Duplenticy becomes an unlikely ally.

Josh O’Connor stands out as Jud. He’s the earnest, ex-boxer priest. He brings raw vulnerability and quiet intensity. This grounds the film’s more outlandish elements. The powerhouse lineup fuels suspicion and sparks. Josh Brolin plays the commanding, domineering Wicks. His sermons blend fire-and-brimstone charisma with manipulative control. Glenn Close is the loyal church pillar Martha Delacroix. She’s his steely right-hand woman. She hides decades of devotion and resentment. Mila Kunis is police chief Geraldine Scott. She’s tough and skeptical but out of her depth. Jeremy Renner plays local doc Dr. Nat Sharp. His bedside manner conceals shadier dealings. Kerry Washington is attorney Vera Draven. She’s sharp-tongued and protective. Thomas Haden Church is reserved groundskeeper Samson Holt. He observes everything with cryptic folksiness. Andrew Scott plays best-selling author Lee Ross. He peddles scandalous exposes on the parish. Cailee Spaeny is the disabled former concert cellist Simone Vivane. Her ethereal presence masks deeper pain. Daryl McCormack is aspiring politician Cy Draven. He’s ambitious and entangled in family webs. Noah Segan pops up as sleazy Nikolai. It’s a fun callback to his earlier roles. This adds series continuity without stealing focus. The ensemble ignites every scene. Clashing agendas and barbed dialogue keep the paranoia boiling.

This installment carves its own distinct path. It embraces a darker, more introspective tone. Think faith-versus-reason noir laced with locked-room impossibility. The setting is a snow-dusted upstate New York parish. This contrasts the polished puzzle-box feel of the originals. The church throbs with simmering divisions. They feel palpably real. Fiery sermons alienate younger parishioners. They drive attendance into the dirt. Whispers hint at buried family fortunes. These tie to the church’s crumbling foundations. Rituals mask exploitation, abuse of power, and grudges. All hide under a veneer of piety.

Cinematographer Steve Yedlin works masterfully. He captures stark contrasts. Candlelit services flicker against vaulted ceilings. Shadowy mausoleums hide grisly secrets. Fog-shrouded grounds host midnight confessions that turn sinister. A cold, wintry palette amplifies isolation. Nathan Johnson’s score blends ominous orchestral swells. It adds subtle choral hints and dissonant organ tones. This creates a haunting vibe. It underscores spiritual unease without overpowering dialogue. Blanc prowls with trademark wit and theatrical flourishes. But a deeper layer emerges. He grapples with existential questions. These involve belief, deception, and waking from illusions. The title ties in directly. It calls amid apparent miracles, staged resurrections, and devilish symbolism. This blurs divine intervention and human malice.

The storyline thrives on classic misdirection. It piles on clues like a stolen devil’s-head knife from the altar. Vanished evidence dissolves in acid. Eerie occurrences hint at the otherworldly. Ghostly apparitions and bleeding statues appear. Then it snaps back to human frailty and greed. The film peels back the parish’s seedy underbelly. Hypocrisy rules the pulpit. Opportunism infects the flock. Buried sins span generations. It avoids preachiness or heavy-handedness. Instead, it fuels interpersonal fireworks. These erupt in confessionals, potlucks gone wrong, and heated vestry arguments.

Highlights abound. Blanc holds probing chats during tense masses. A single hymn masks frantic whispers. Late-night graveyard prowls use flashlights. They reveal half-buried scandals. A pulse-pounding chase winds through labyrinthine catacombs. Jud’s raw confession scenes blend vulnerability with defiance. The unmaskings cascade like dominoes. They form a brilliantly orchestrated finale. This echoes the first film’s precision. But it adds emotional stakes. Themes of redemption, forgiveness, and blind faith’s cost hit hard. They linger longer.

Flaws exist. The runtime stretches past two hours, leading to noticeable drag in the back half where explanatory flashbacks overstay their welcome and blunt the mounting tension. The crowded suspect list feels star-studded to a fault, with the expanded cast and their distinct personalities—from Renner’s oily doc to Washington’s sharp lawyer—often coming across more as a parade of familiar cameos than fully fleshed-out suspects. This dilutes the razor-sharp individual motivations that made the earlier entries so airtight, as some characters blend into the background despite the name recognition.

Craig remains the beating heart. He refines Blanc into a weary yet unbreakable warrior. Twinkling eyes hide hard-earned cynicism and quiet scars. This bridges the series’ growth perfectly. He evolves from wide-eyed newcomer to seasoned truth-seeker. Notably, his performance dials back bombastic Foghorn Leghorn bluster. It drops the scenery-chewing antics from Glass Onion. Instead, it opts for nuanced eccentricities. Subtle drawl inflections shift from playful to piercing. Haunted pauses carry unspoken regrets. Layered glances reveal a detective worn by deceptions. He keeps infectious charm and deductive brilliance.

He bounces off O’Connor’s conflicted priest. Their electric, buddy-cop chemistry grounds the mystery. It adds human connection amid supernatural tinges. Brolin chews scenery as tyrannical Wicks. His booming voice and piercing stare dominate. Close brings steely devotion to Martha. She layers quiet menace under pious smiles. The ensemble delivers scene-stealing turns. Renner’s oily doc has subtle tics. Washington’s lawyer cuts through BS like a blade. Church’s groundskeeper drops cryptic wisdom. Spaeny’s cellist haunts the score. The group dynamic crackles. Suspicion, snark, and alliances build tension. It doesn’t fully match Knives Out‘s intimacy. Nor does it rival Glass Onion‘s ego clashes. Raw charisma and sharp writing carry it far. Tighter arcs would elevate it further.

Behind the camera, Johnson amps visual and thematic style. It reflects the trilogy’s arc masterfully. The debut had cozy, rain-lashed Thrombey manor confines. The sequel brought flashy, tropical island excess. This film offers brooding parish grit. Sacred spaces twist into battlegrounds. Production design captures ecclesiastical opulence turned sinister. Vibrant stained glass casts blood-red shadows. Ancient relics whisper curses. Fog-shrouded grounds pulse with menace. It avoids campy parody. The balance feels reverent yet unsettling.

Dialogue pops with Blanc’s poetic rants. Extended musings explore faith’s illusions. They mirror “dead men walking” through empty rituals. This weaves personal growth into procedural beats. It never halts the pace. Screenplay-wise, it remixes boldly. It expands from domestic squabbles to global posers. Now it targets a fractured flock in dogma and greed. Subtle nods hint at Blanc’s odyssey. No direct sequel hook burdens it. No franchise baggage weighs it down.

In the end, Wake Up Dead Man solidifies the saga. It spins timeless whodunits freshly and vitally. Each outing sharpens the social knife. Targets evolve—from greedy kin to tycoons to holy hypocrites wielding faith. Pacing hiccups hit the bloated third act. The overwhelming ensemble poses challenges. Still, it grabs from the opening sermon-gone-wrong. It rewards with twists, depth, and a hopeful close. This lingers like a benediction. Devotees find layers to chew. Mystery fans geek over mechanics. Newcomers benefit from earlier starts. But this standalone shines. Johnson’s vision evolves fearlessly. Craig’s magnetism deepens. The door cracks for more mayhem. Pop the popcorn. Dim the lights. Let confessions begin.

The Unnominated #12: Tombstone (dir by George Pan Cosmatos)


Though the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences claim that the Oscars honor the best of the year, we all know that there are always worthy films and performances that end up getting overlooked.  Sometimes, it’s because the competition too fierce.  Sometimes, it’s because the film itself was too controversial.  Often, it’s just a case of a film’s quality not being fully recognized until years after its initial released.  This series of reviews takes a look at the films and performances that should have been nominated but were, for whatever reason, overlooked.  These are the Unnominated.

I have come around on Tombstone.

The first time I watched this 1993 film, I was a bit confused as to why so many of my friends (especially my male friends) worshipped the film.  To me, it was a bit too messy for its own good, an overlong film that told a familiar story and which featured so many characters that it was difficult for me to keep track of them all.  Perhaps because everyone I knew loved the film so much, I felt the need to play contrarian and pick out every flaw I could find.

And I still think those flaws are there.  The film had a troubled production, with original director Kevin Jarre falling behind in shooting and getting replaced by George Pan Cosmatos, a director who didn’t have any real interest in the material and whose all-business approach rubbed many members of the cast the wrong way.  Kurt Russell took over production of the film, directing the actors and reportedly paring down the sprawling script to emphasize the relationship between Russell’s Wyatt Earp and Val Kilmer’s Doc Holliday.  On the one hand, this led to a lot of characters who really didn’t seem to have much to do in the finished film.  Jason Priestley’s bookish deputy comes to mind.  On the other hand, Russell was right.

The film’s heart really is found in the friendship between Wyatt and Doc.  It doesn’t matter that, in real life, Wyatt Earp was hardly as upstanding as portrayed by Kurt Russell.  It also doesn’t matter that the real-life Doc Holliday was perhaps not as poetic as portrayed by Val Kilmer.  Today, if you ask someone to picture Wyatt Earp, they’re probably going to picture Kurt Russell with a mustache, a cowboy hat, and a rifle.  And if you ask them to picture Doc Holliday, they’re going to picture Val Kilmer, sweating due to tuberculosis but still managing to enjoy life.  Did Doc Holliday every say, “I’ll be your huckleberry,” before gunning someone down?  He might as well have.  That’s how he’s remembered in the popular imagination.  And it’s due to the performances of Russell and Kilmer that I’ve come around to eventually liking this big and flawed western. With each subsequent viewing, I’ve come to appreciate how Russell and Kilmer managed to create fully realized characters while still remaining true to the Western genre.  If Wyatt Earp initially fought for the law, Doc Holliday fought for friendship.  Kilmer is not only believable as a confident gunslinger who has no fear of walking into a dangerous situation.  He’s also believable as someone who puts his personal loyalty above all else.  He’s the type of friend that everyone would want to have.

That said, I do have to mention that there are a lot of talented people in the cast, many of whom are no longer with us but who will live forever as a result their appearance here.  When Powers Boothe delivered the line, “Well …. bye,” he had no way of knowing that he would eventually become a meme.  Boothe is no longer with us, I’m sad to say.  But he’ll live forever as long as people need a pithy way to respond to someone announcing that they’re leaving social media forever.  Charlton Heston appears briefly as a rancher and he links this 90s western with the westerns of the past.  Robert Mitchum provides the narration and it just feels right.  The large ensemble cast can be difficult to keep track of and even a little distracting but there’s no way I can’t appreciate a film that manages to bring together not just Russell, Kilmer, Boothe, Heston, and Mitchum but also Sam Elliott, Bill Paxton, Michael Biehn, Michael Rooker, Billy Bob Thornton, Frank Stallone, Terry O’Quinn, and even Billy Zane!  The female roles are a bit underwritten.  Dana Delaney is miscast but Joanna Pacula feels exactly right as Doc Holliday’s lover.

But ultimately, this film really does belong to Val Kilmer.  When I heard the sad news that he had passed away last night, I thought of two films.  I thought of Top Gun and then I thought of Tombstone.  Iceman probably wouldn’t have had much use for Doc Holliday.  And Doc Holliday would have resented Iceman’s attitude.  But Val Kilmer — that brilliant actor who was so underappreciated until he fell ill — brought both of them to brilliant life.  In the documentary Val, Kilmer attends a showing of Tombstone and you can say he much he loves the sound of audience cheering whenever Doc Holliday showed up onscreen.

Tombstone was a flawed film and 1993 was a strong year.  But it’s a shame that Val Kilmer was never once nominated for an Oscar.  Tombstone may not have been a Best Picture contender but, in a year when Tommy Lee Jones won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for his role in the similarly flawed The Fugitive, it seems a shame that Kilmer’s Doc Holliday was overlooked.

Tombstone (1993, dir by George Pan Cosmatos (and Kurt Russell), DP: William Fraker)

Previous entries in The Unnominated:

  1. Auto Focus 
  2. Star 80
  3. Monty Python and The Holy Grail
  4. Johnny Got His Gun
  5. Saint Jack
  6. Office Space
  7. Play Misty For Me
  8. The Long Riders
  9. Mean Streets
  10. The Long Goodbye
  11. The General

Lisa Reviews An Oscar Nominee: Sideways (dir by Alexander Payne)


I’ve never really gotten the obsession that some people have with wine.

Some of that may be because I hardly ever drink.  I’m not quite a teetotaler but I seem to be getting closer with each passing year.  But, beyond that, I just don’t get the whole culture that’s sprung up around wine snobbery.  I don’t get the people who sit around and say, “Oh, this is an amazing Australian wine and, someday, my great-great grandchilden will get to open it when they’re 90 and on their deathbeds.”  Everything that I’ve seen about wine tastings annoys me, from the overdramatic sniffing to the big bowls of spit-out wine.  (I’m not a big fan of spitting in general.)

The 2004 film Sideways is a film that’s all about wine snobs.  It follows two friends as they take a week-long vacation in the Santa Barbara wine country.  Miles (Paul Giamatti) is a depressed English teacher who loves wine and who has never gotten over his divorce.  He’s also a writer, though a remarkably unsuccessful one.  He’s waiting to hear back on his latest manuscript, an autobiographical novel that he fears might not be commercial enough.  Jack (Thomas Haden Church) was Miles’s college roommate and they’ve remained friends, despite Miles feeling that they have nothing in common.  Jack is a former semi-successful actor who now works as a voice over artist.  Jack knows little about wine.  He’s just looking for a chance to indulge in some meaningless, commitment-free sex before getting married.

Miles attempts to teach Jack to appreciate wine.  Jack attempts to get Miles to actually enjoy life for once.  Together …. THEY SOLVE CRIMES!

Actually, they don’t solve crimes.  That’s not the type of film that Sideways is.  This is an Alexander Payne film, which means that it’s essentially a road film in which two different characters consider their own mortality and question whether or not there’s more to life than just what they see around them.  The difference between the two characters is that Miles obsesses on the meaning of it all while Jack doesn’t exactly ignore Miles’s concerns but he’s much better at shrugging them off and blithely moving from one experience to another.  Miles wears his neurosis on his sleeve while Jack is slightly better at hiding them.

During their week-long excursion into wine country, Miles and Jack fall for two women who undoubtedly deserve better.  Maya (Virginia Madsen) is a waitress who is working on her master’s degree in horticulture.  Maya shares Miles’s love of wine and is one of the few people to show any genuine interest in Miles’s book.  Stephanie (Sandra Oh) is as much of a free spirit as Jack and, after spending two days with her and her daughter, Jack starts talking about canceling (or, at the very least, delaying) his upcoming wedding.  Miles, meanwhile, is falling in love with Maya but there’s a problem.  Jack lied to Maya and told her that Miles’s book is about to be published and Jack has failed to tell Stephanie that he’s engaged….

And really, it would be very easy to be dismissive of both Miles and Jack if they were played by anyone other than Paul Giamatti and Thomas Haden Church.  If you ever need a movie to cite as an example of how perfect casting can inspire you to forgive characters who do rotten things and make stupid mistakes, Sideways would be a good film to go with.  Thomas Haden Church brings an unexpected sincerity to the role of Jack, one that keeps him from coming across as being malicious but instead suggests that he just can’t help himself.  If nothing else, Haden Church’s concern for Miles comes across being genuine.  (“I guess because you were wearing your seat belt.”)  Meanwhile, in the role of Miles, Paul Giamatti again proves that he’s one of those rare actors who can take a rather annoying character and somehow make him totally sympathetic.  It help that Giamatti brings a lot of self-awareness to the role.  Yes, Miles can be whiny and self-absorbed but at least he knows that he’s whiny and self-absorbed and he’s just as annoyed with himself as we often are.

The actors even manage to make all of the wine talk palpable for non-wine people like me.  During Virginia Madsen’s lengthy monologue about why she loves wine, I found myself thinking, “That’s why I love movies.”  Just as wine tastes different depending on who is drinking it and when they opened the bottle, how one experiences a movie can change from time to time and depending on each individual viewing experience.  Just as the best wine was cultivated over time, the same can be said of movies, many of which are not recognized for their greatness until years after they were first produced.  Just as Maya thinks about all the people who played a part in creating the perfect bottle of wine, I think about all the people who played a part in creating the movies that I love.  You don’t have to love wine to enjoy Sideways.  You just have to love something.

Sideways was nominated for Best Picture but it lost to Million Dollar Baby.  Amazingly, Paul Giamatti was not nominated for Best Actor.

Lisa Marie Does Killer Joe (dir. by William Friedkin)


I nearly didn’t get to see Killer Joe.

Killer Joe, the latest film from William Friedkin (who, 40 years ago, won an Oscar for directing The French Connection), is rated NC-17 for “graphic disturbing content involving violence and sexuality, and a scene of brutality.”  That, more than anything, was why I wanted to see Killer Joe.  I wanted to see just how extreme a film starring Matthew McConaughey could possibly be.  However, I also knew that the NC-17 rating would mean that I would have to show my ID before being allowed to have my mind corrupted.  See, I might be 26 years old but most people seem to assume that I’m 17.  That is, until I speak.  At that point, they usually realize that they’ve guessed incorrectly and decide that I’m actually 15.

Sure enough, when me and my BFF Evelyn bought our tickets to see Killer Joe earlier this week, I was asked to show my ID. Smiling my sweetest smile, I held up my driver’s license.  I was expecting that the ticker seller would just glance at the ID and then say, “Thank you,” but instead, he literally appeared to be studying my picture.  His eyes shifted from the license to me and back to the license.  I was starting to get nervous because, after all, it’s not like I was trying to get through airport security.  I just wanted to see a forbidden movie.

Behind me, I heard Evelyn say, “That looks like a fake to me.”

“Ha ha,” I cleverly replied.

Evelyn responded with, “I don’t trust her.  Maybe you guys should strip search her…”

Finally, the ticket seller looked away from my driver’s license and, as he handed me my ticket, he told us that the theater’s management had instructed him to make sure that we understood that we were about to see an explicitly violent film.  He also told us that there were free donuts available at the concession stand.  That was nice of him.

So, after all that, I finally got to see the forbidden film Killer Joe and you know what?  Killer Joe earns its NC-17 rating, not so much because it’s any more exploitive than any other mainstream film released this year but because it’s actually honest about being an exploitation film.  Killer Joe may be playing in the arthouses but it’s a grindhouse film and proud of it.

Killer Joe takes place in my hometown of Dallas (though it was filmed in New Orleans) and it features perhaps the sleaziest group of losers that you’ll find on a movie screen this year.  Chris (Emile Hirsch) is a drug dealer who lives with his mother and who moves, talks, and thinks with the scrambled energy of a meth addict.  His father Ansel (Thomas Haden Church) is an affably stupid alcoholic who lives in a trailer park with his second wife, Sharla (Gina Gershon, who gives a ferociously good performance here) and his daughter, 16 year-old Dottie (Juno Temple).  Dottie is a spacey girl who is given to sleep walking and who doesn’t appear to be quite all there.  Chris is creepily overprotective of her and, though it’s never implicitly stated, it quickly becomes obvious that there’s a rather disturbing subtext to her relationship with both Chris and her father.

Chris has managed to get into debt with some local criminals but he’s got a plan.  As he explains to Ansel, his mother has got a sizable life insurance policy and if she dies, the money will go to Dottie.  Chris and Ansel hire a hitman to carry out the murder for them.  That hitman is Joe (Matthew McConaughey, giving the performance of his career), a demonic charmer who always dresses in black and who has a day job as a homicide detective.  When Chris and Ansel explain that they don’t have the money to pay him in advance, Joe agrees to take Dottie as a retainer. 

Soon, Joe is living in the trailer park with Dottie, Chris is getting brutally beaten up every time he goes out in the daylight, and the murder doesn’t seem to be any closer to actually happening.  When Joe finally does make his move, it all leads to a lot of very brutal violence, a series of betrayals, and a very disturbing scene involving a drumstick from Kentucky Fried Chicken.  As I said before, Killer Joe earns that NC-17.

William Friedkin, who has had a rather uneven career, dives right into the film’s sordid atmosphere.  The majority of the film takes place in that Hellish trailer park and Friedkin perfectly captures the feeling of a society made up of people who are trapped by their own lack of intelligence, imagination, and status.  There’s been a lot of films made about white trash but Killer Joe gets it right, creating an all too believable Hell where everyone can afford to buy a pit bull but not a decent suit (or, in the case of Dottie, a bra).  When the violence does come, Friedkin doesn’t shy away from showing it nor does he try to pretend that violence doesn’t have consequences.  When people get hurt in Killer Joe, they stay hurt. 

Matthew McConaughey is a wonder as Killer Joe.  Whereas many actors would tend to go overboard with such a psychotic character (and you’d be justified in expecting McConaughey to go overboard as well), McConaughey is actually rather restrained for most of the film. The power of his performance comes from the fact that, while everyone else is going crazy, McConaughey is subdued and steady.  It’s only when he speaks to Dottie that we get a few clues of just what exactly it is that lurks beneath Killer Joe’s coolly professional manner.  It’s only towards the end of the film that McConaughey allows his performance to get a bit more showy but, by that point, the entire film has gone to such an extreme that Joe still seems almost sensible.

Killer Joe, however, is not a perfect film.  Though the film is set in North Texas (and, in fact, the Texas-setting is pretty important to the film’s overall plot), it was filmed in Louisiana.  Speaking as someone who has lived in both of those fine states, trust me when I say that, visually, there’s a huge visual difference between Texas and Louisiana.  (Evelyn and I shared a laugh  when we spotted Palm Trees in the film’s version of Dallas.) 

While the clumsy use of Louisiana as a stand-in for Texas probably won’t be noticeable to anyone outside of the Southwest, a far more noticeable problem with Killer Joe is that the film is based on a stage play and, despite some efforts to open up the action, the film still basically feels rather stagey.  This is the type of movie where people tend to deliver semi-poetic monologues about their childhood at the drop of a (cowboy) hat.  To a certain extent, the staginess made it easier to handle the film’s violence (and perhaps that was Friedkin’s intention) but, at other times, it just caused the action to drag.

Ultimately, Killer Joe is a film that I would recommend with reservations.  It’s definitely not for everyone and I don’t know that it’s a film that I’ll ever want to sit through again (seriously, I’ll be surprised if I ever manage to eat another drumstick) but it is a movie worth seeing.  If nothing else, it’s the closest were going to get to a true grindhouse film this year.

Trailer: John Carter (Official)


Walt Disney Pictures has finally released the first official trailer for their upcoming sci-fi, action-adventure film John Carter (film was originally titled John Carter of Mars). The film is based on the Edgar Rice Burroughs novel, A Princess of Mars, which would go one to become the first in Burroughs’ Barsoom series.

The film will star Taylor Kitsch (last seen in X-Men Origins: Wolverine as Gambit) in the title role and Lynn Collins (also from Wolverine as Silver Fox) as the aforementioned princess from the original novel. John Carter looks to be a mixture of live-action and fully-realized CGI characters who make up some of the inhabitants of Mars.

It will be interesting how Disney will market this film with little to no big stars and with a director more known for directing Pixar animated films like Finding Nemo and Wall-E in Andrew Stanton.

John Carter is set to have a March 9, 2012 release date.