Film Review: M.O.M. Mothers of Monsters (dir by Tucia Lyman)

“Where were the parents?”

That’s what we ask ourselves after every school shooting, isn’t it?  Because the perpetrators are usually not around to explain themselves, there’s a tendency to look to the shooter’s parents and to demand to know how they could have allowed things to get so out of control.  The assumption almost always is that the parents were negligent.  If only the shooter’s mother or father had done a better job, we’re led to believe, the tragedy could have been prevented.  It’s human nature.  When faced with an unspeakable tragedy, people need someone to blame.

Of course, an actual examination of the history of most school shooting does reveal some bad parents but it also reveals parents who did their best under difficult circumstances or who were as fooled by their children as everyone else in the world.  Yes, there are the parents who gave their obviously unstable children guns.  But there are other parents who tried to get their children help and who tried to be tough disciplinarians and who sincerely believed that that their children were doing better in school or life or whatever.  And if a parent does suspect that their child is a sociopath, what are they to do?  Are they supposed to stop loving that child and cast them away?  Too often, the trauma of violence leads people to seek out easy answers but often times, those easy answers are not there.  We forget that no one sets out to raise a monster.

M.O.M. Mother of Monsters is a found footage film that attempts to explore some of these issues.  Abbey Bell (Melinda Page Hamilton) is a single mom who suspects that her 16 year-old son, Jacob (Bailey Edwards), might be a psychopath.  So, she plants hidden cameras around her house and she obsessively films their every interaction.  She says that she’s doing it so that she can prove that her son is dangerous and also so she can help all of the other mothers out there who are struggling to raise psychotic children.

And yes, Jacob is certainly obnoxious.  He’s frequently angry and he makes inappropriate jokes about killing people.  He spends a lot of his time locked away in his room and he throws a fit when Abbey tries to take away his Playstation.  He’s casually racist and he listens to loud and angry music and he’s a habitual liar.  From the time he was 6 years-old, he’s been drawing disturbing pictures.  The question, though, is whether he’s the next school shooter or if he’s just a 16 year-old boy.

Not helping matter is that Abbey herself seems to be even more unstable than her son.  Abbey gets as mad at her own mother as Jacob does at her and she continually talks about whether or not evil is hereditary.  Throughout the film, there are dark hints about an incident that occurred before Jacob was born.  When we’re told that Abbey majored in psychology, we find ourselves wondering if she’s trying to use Jacob an his bed behavior to justify her own fears and obsessions.  Who is the bigger threat, Jacob or Abbey?  The film keeps you guessing all the way up to its violent conclusion.

The first two thirds of M.O.M. works pretty well.  Though I’m usually not a fan of the found footage genre, M.O.M. actually comes up with a believable justification for the constant filming.  It also makes good use of its low budget, setting almost all of the action in one claustrophobic house.  Bailey Edwards and especially Melinda Page Hamilton do a great job playing the two main characters and the film keeps you guessing as to whether Abbey is right to be concerned or if she’s projecting her own instability onto her son.

Unfortunately, the final third of the film features a plot twist that just didn’t work for me.  While I imagine that it will work for some people, it was just a bit too implausible for me to accept and the twist’s clumsy execution took me out of the film’s carefully constructed reality.  The film went from being an intriguing character study of two damaged people to just being another found footage thriller.  As such, the film’s final disturbing image didn’t quite have the power that it perhaps would have if not for that final twist.

That said, the first part of the film was undeniably effective and that’s enough for me to recommend it.  If nothing else, this film identities Tucia Lyman as a director to watch out for.  According to the imdb, this was first narrative feature film and she did a good job using the familiar rules of the found footage genre to tell an intriguing story.  I look forward to her second film.

One response to “Film Review: M.O.M. Mothers of Monsters (dir by Tucia Lyman)

  1. Pingback: Lisa’s Week In Review: 7/13/20 — 7/19/20 | Through the Shattered Lens

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.