The TSL Horror Grindhouse: Blackenstein (dir by William A. Levey)


1973’s Blackenstein tells the story of Eddie Turner (Joe De Sue), a black man who served in Vietnam.  Unfortunately, while serving his country, Eddie stepped on a landmine and lost his arms and his legs.  Now back in Los Angeles, Eddie spends his days laying in a bed in a VA hospital, where he’s taunted by an orderly who, it turns out, is actually just upset because he wanted to join the army but he failed his physical.  Because this film was made on the cheap, Eddie’s limbless state is represented by continually having the covers of his bed drawn up to his neck.

Eddie’s girlfriend, Dr. Winifred Walker (Ivory Stone), is upset because Eddie is having a hard time adjusting to life in the States and, having lost the lower half of his body, Eddie has been rendered impotent.  She gets a job working with Dr. Stein (John Hart), a doctor who has down amazing things with DNA and RNA.  He lives in a castle-like mansion and he has a laboratory that is full of lasers and beakers that are labeled “DNA.”  Apparently, Dr. Stein can inject people with DNA …. don’t look at me like that, I didn’t write this movie …. and not only reverse the aging process but also help people regrow limbs.

Eddie is brought to the mansion to be Dr. Stein’s latest patient.  Unfortunately, Dr. Stein’s assistant, Malcomb (Roosevelt Jackson), has fallen in love with Winifred and is stung when she tells him that her heart belongs to Eddie.  Malcomb sabotages Eddie’s DNA injections so that Eddie, along with growing back his arms and his legs, also transforms into a turtleneck-wearing monster with a flattop.  Eddie spends his days in a coma and his nights stalking Los Angeles.

Blackenstein was released at the height of the blaxploitation boom, when filmmakers were reinterpreting classic genres with black actors.  Some of these films, like Shaft and Superfly, hold up very well and remain a part of the pop cultural landscape.  And others, like Blackenstein, would be largely forgotten if not for the strangeness of their title.  Blackenstein was clearly inspired by the success of Blacula, though it comes nowhere close to being as compelling as that film.

Blackenstein has more than a few problems.  The pacing is abysmal.  The plot requires a lot of smart people to do a lot of dumb things.  As opposed to other films based on Mary Shelley’s novel, the Monster is neither scary nor sympathetic.  Eddie Turner was played by a non-actor named Joe de Sue, who was hired because he was a client of the Frank Salteri, the criminal lawyer-turned-filmmaker who produced the film.  Joe de Sue rarely speaks and when he does, he turns his face away from the camera and it is fairly obvious that his dialogue was dubbed in after the scene was shot.  Ivory Stone and Roosevelt Jackson awkwardly deliver their lines about DNA and RNA in a tone that suggests that neither they nor the filmmakers were exactly sure what either one of those were.  John Hart is perhaps the most mild mad scientist in the history of horror cinema.

One could argue that there’s an interesting subtext to this film, with its scenes of a white scientist conducting a dangerous medical experiment on a black man who is not in a position to refuse.  But let’s not fool ourselves.  This film is not Blacula, with its title character being transformed into a vampire as punishment for standing up to Dracula’s racism.  Blackenstein had very little on its mind, beyond cashing in on the then-blaxploitation boom.  The title promises a certain over-the-top silliness but, ultimately, this film is way too boring for something called Blackenstein.

The Eric Roberts Horror Collection: Deadly Nightshade (dir by Benjamin Rider)


2021’s Deadly Nightshade is not an easy film to describe.

An analog voice asks us to return to a time in the recent past, when people watched movies on VHS tapes and the television was the world’s main source of escape.  In Brixton, Victoria (Suzie Houlihan) goes to her flat, excited to spend the weekend in Brighton with her boyfriend, Marcus (Matthew Laird).  She finds a mysterious man named Adam (Christopher Blackburn) in the flat.  Adam says that he’s a friend of Marcus’s and he’s going to be staying in the flat for the weekend.  Adam wants Victoria to listen to a tape recording of what he claims is an exorcism.  Victoria is not comfortable with him.

Marcus finally shows up, covered in blood that is not his.  Marcus says that he witnessed an accident on the way home and he stopped to rescue one of the women involved.  Suddenly, that woman shows up.  Her name is Mia (Lottie Johnson) and it appears that she’s planning on staying in the apartment as well.

The analog voice invites us to watch a documentary about the real events that inspired Deadly Nightshade but an appearance by Eric Roberts as occult expert Father Walsh clues us in that the documentary is just as fictional as the film that we’re watching.

Strange things continue to happen at the flat.  Victoria’s mother mysteriously appears at one point.  Adam has visions of a woman lying in bed and telling him that he’s too obsessed with television.  Victoria falls asleep and when she wakes up, Mia is claiming that Marcus is her boyfriend and that Adam is Victoria’s boyfriend and no one really seems to know why Victoria is even at the flat.  For all the talk of spending the weekend in Brighton, no one seems like they’re in a particular hurry to leave the flat….

It’s an odd film and I would suggest not trying too hard to follow the plot.  It’s a film that plays out like a filmed nightmare, working on its own bizarre strain of logic.  Just as in a dream, personalities change randomly and the lay-out of the flat seems to alter from scene to scene.  Plot points, like Adam’s exorcism tape, are brought up and then abandoned just to mysteriously be brought up again.  It’s not a movie that makes much sense but, if you relax and just go with it, it definitely leaves an impression.

As for Eric Roberts, he’s not in much of the film.  It’s pretty obvious that he filmed his scenes in an hour or two, probably at his own home.  It wouldn’t surprise me if he provided his own clerical collar.  That said, if you’re going to have a mysterious man talking about the supernatural in your low-budget film, I would say that Eric Roberts is who you would want to go with.

Previous Eric Roberts Films That We Have Reviewed:

  1. Star 80 (1983)
  2. Blood Red (1989)
  3. The Ambulance (1990)
  4. The Lost Capone (1990)
  5. Love, Cheat, & Steal (1993)
  6. Love Is A Gun (1994)
  7. Sensation (1994)
  8. Dark Angel (1996)
  9. Doctor Who (1996)
  10. Most Wanted (1997)
  11. Mr. Brightside (2004)
  12. Six: The Mark Unleased (2004)
  13. Hey You (2006)
  14. In The Blink of an Eye (2009)
  15. Enemies Among Us (2010)
  16. The Expendables (2010) 
  17. Sharktopus (2010)
  18. Deadline (2012)
  19. Miss Atomic Bomb (2012)
  20. Lovelace (2013)
  21. Self-Storage (2013)
  22. This Is Our Time (2013)
  23. Inherent Vice (2014)
  24. Road to the Open (2014)
  25. Rumors of War (2014)
  26. Amityville Death House (2015)
  27. A Fatal Obsession (2015)
  28. Stalked By My Doctor (2015)
  29. Joker’s Poltergeist (2016)
  30. Stalked By My Doctor: The Return (2016)
  31. The Wrong Roommate (2016)
  32. Stalked By My Doctor: Patient’s Revenge (2018)
  33. Monster Island (2019)
  34. Seven Deadly Sins (2019)
  35. Stalked By My Doctor: A Sleepwalker’s Nightmare (2019)
  36. The Wrong Mommy (2019)
  37. Free Lunch Express (2020)
  38. Her Deadly Groom (2020)
  39. Top Gunner (2020)
  40. Just What The Doctor Ordered (2021)
  41. Killer Advice (2021)
  42. The Poltergeist Diaries (2021)
  43. A Town Called Parable (2021)
  44. My Dinner With Eric (2022)

The Zombie King (2013, directed by Aidan Belizaire)


Embittered by the death of his wife, Samuel Peters (Edward Furlong) turns to voodoo in an attempt to bring her back to life.  Kalfu (Corey Feldman), the lord of the underworld, agrees to close the gates of Hell and allow the dead to roam the Earth with Peters as the immortal zombie king.

Edward Furlong selling his soul to Corey Feldman might sound like the premise of an entertainingly bad movie but, unfortunately, nether Furlong nor Feldman have much screen time.  As hard as it is believe, The Zombie King may be one of the first recent films that would have benefitted from more Corey Feldman and Edward Furlong.  Instead, the two of them are basically just special guest stars with limited screen time.

Instead, the majority of the movie is about a group of humans trying to survive in a village that’s been invaded by zombies and quarantined by the government.  The movie tries to balance horror with British humor in a style that tries way too hard to duplicate Simon Pegg’s success with Shaun of the Dead, right down to casting a Nick Frost look-alike as a quirky milkman named Munch.

Much ends up in a group led by a stoic mailman named Ed Wallace (George McCluskey), who says that delivering the mail in Northgate was just as dangerous as being a member of the SAS.  The movie mixes scenes of zombie mayhem with scenes of Ed, Mulch, and the other survivors having very British arguments about how best to deal with the situation and whether it’s safer to head to a church or a pub.  There are some amusing moments but there’s even more jokes that fall flat and Munch is never as funny as a character as the film seems to think he is.

Even with Edward Furlong welcoming the recently dead to “Hell on Earth” and Corey Feldman giving a surprisingly energetic performance as the lord of the underworld, The Zombie King never escapes the shadow of all the zombie comedies that came before it.

Retro Television Reviews: Dragnet 1966 (dir by Jack Webb)


Welcome to Retro Television Reviews, a feature where we review some of our favorite and least favorite shows of the past!  On Sundays, I will be reviewing the made-for-television movies that used to be a primetime mainstay.  Today’s film is 1969’s Dragnet 1966!  It can be viewed on YouTube!

“This is the city….”

So begins Dragnet, a television movie version of the classic cop show that was the Law & Order of it’s day.  Dragnet began as a radio program in 1949 before making it’s way over to television in 1951.  Each episode starred (and the majority were directed by) Jack Webb, who played a no-nonsense cop named Joe Friday.  Friday narrated every episode, dropping trivia about the history of Los Angeles while also showing viewers how the cops went about catching criminals.  Despite what is commonly believed, Joe Friday never said, “Just the facts, ma’m,” but he did investigate each case with the cool determination of a professional who kept his emotions under control.  The majority of Dragnet’s episodes were based on actual cases that were worked by the LAPD, hence the opening declaration of, “The story you are about to see is true.”

On television, Dragnet originally ran from 1951 to 1959, during which time Dragnet also became the first television series to be adapted into a feature film.  Jack Webb decided to relaunch Dragnet in 1966 and he produced a made-for-television movie that followed Friday and his latest partner, the far more talkative Bill Gannon (Harry Morgan), as they worked multiple cases over the course of one long weekend.  The pilot movie did lead to a new show, one that lasted from 1967 to 1970 and which is today fondly remembered for scenes of Friday and Gannon debating the merits of the legal system with hippies.  However, for whatever reason, the 1966 pilot movie was not actually aired until 1969.

The made-for-TV movie features Friday and Gannon searching not for LSD dealers and draft dodgers but instead for a crazed photographer (Vic Perrin) who hires women to pose for him and then ties them up and takes their picture right before her murders them.  The photographer is based on real-life serial killer Harvey Glatman and Perrin is perfectly creepy in the role.  Though Friday never loses his composure, his disgust at the photographer and his crimes is palpable and it adds an extra charge to the scene where, in the middle of a drenching rain storm, Friday tries to sneak up on the trailer where he believes the photographer is holding his latest victim.  It’s actually a pretty exciting scene and definitely one that will take by surprise anyone who thinks of the 60s Dragnet as just being a campy exercise in establishment resentment.

Of course, catching a serial killer is not all that Friday and Gannon deal with.  It’s a long weekend so Friday and Gannon end up investigating the murder of a French tourist and Friday helps a younger, black detective deal with a racist criminal.  (The scene where Friday stands up to the racist was obviously meant to answer those who claimed the LAPD was a racist organization.)  At the start of the film, Joe almost gets collared into working security for a visiting Russian diplomat and the Russian’s paranoid security team is contrasted to the level-headed and capable men of the LAPD.  Some of these scenes are better than others.  The French tourist subplot features some truly risible acting and the scene with the racist is well-intentioned but still feels a bit condescending in its portrayal of the black detective needing Friday to help him deal with the suspect.  That said, I did enjoy listening to Bill Gannon talking about his plans for retirement and how working for the LAPD was destroying his teeth.  Harry Morgan’s folksy humor was always the perfect counterpart to Jack Webb’s perpetually rational Friday.

Finally, I appreciated that the movie featured a scene with Friday and Gannon went undercover at a lonely hearts club.  If you’ve watched the 1960s version of Dragnet, you know that, for all the times that Friday and Gannon went undercover, they never really put much effort into it.  I mean, they didn’t ever bother to take off their jackets!

Though I was disappointed by the lack of hippies, Dragnet 1966 was still not only a good police procedural but also a fun time capsule of its era.

October True Crime: The Honeymoon Killers (dir by Leonard Kastle)


The 1970 film, The Honeymoon Killers, takes place in the late 40s.  Martha Beck (Shirley Stoler) is an overweight nurse who lives in Alabama with her senile mother (Dortha Duckworth) and her best friend, Bunny (Doris Roberts).  Knowing that Martha is lonely, Bunny signs Martha up for a “lonely hearts club,” which was basically the Tinder and Craig’s List of the pre-Internet age.  Though Martha is initially reluctant, she soon starts to receive letters from a conman named Ray Fernandez (Tony Lo Bianco).  Ray specializes in swindling the women who respond to his letters.  After Ray travels to Alabama and tricks Martha into giving him a “loan,” Ray sends her a letter telling him that he can no longer correspond with her.  Martha responds by getting Bunny to call Ray and tell him that she attempted suicide.

Recognizing Martha as a fellow con artist, Ray invites Martha to his home in New York.  He shows her the pictures that he’s received from other women and reveals how he makes his money.  Martha soon becomes Ray’s partner in crime, traveling across the country with Ray and meeting the women, most of whom are elderly, that Ray has corresponded with.  Ray claims that his name is Charles Martin and that Martha is his sister.  He also swears to Martha that he won’t sleep with any of the women while he’s swindling them.  Even though Martha knows that Ray is a pathological liar, she chooses to believe him whenever he swears that he’s actually in love with her.

The first murder occurs when Martha realizes that one of Ray’s victims is determined to sleep with him.  Martha gives her an overdose of sleeping pills and then Martha and Ray dump her on a bus, where she subsequently dies.  More murders occur, usually due Martha and Ray making sloppy mistakes that reveal their actual plans to their victims.  At first, Ray claims that he’s disgusted with killing and he says that Martha is the one who has to do it because she’s a nurse.  But eventually, Ray shows his true colors.

When talking about The Honeymoon Killers, one has to start by mentioning that this film was nearly Martin Scorsese’s second feature film.  (Fresh out of film school, Scorsese had previously turned a student film, Who’s That Knocking At My Door?, into his feature debut.)  Scorsese was fired from the film because the film’s producers felt that he was taking too long to set up the shots and, according to Scorsese himself, he was only shooting master shots.  That said, there are a few Scorsese-directed scenes to be found in The Honeymoon Killers and they’re pretty easy to spot.  The film opens with a tracking shot of Shirley Stoler walking through her hospital and reprimanding two interns.  I was not surprised to learn that was one of the Scorsese scenes.  After Scorsese left the project, he was replaced by Leonard Kastle, who wrote the script.  The Honeymoon Killers was both Kastle’s directorial debut and his swan song.

The film’s harsh and grainy black-and-white cinematography gives the film a documentary-style feel and while there are moments of dark humor, The Honeymoon Killers is overall a grim movie.  It plays out like a creeping nightmare, one where the viewer knows that there’s something terrible waiting right around the corner.  The bickering between Martha and Ray may occasionally inspire a chuckle, but there’s nothing funny about the murders and the film, to its credit, it totally on the side of Martha and Ray’s victims.  Martha and Ray may look down upon them but the film itself portrays them as being lonely people who are struggling to adjust to a changing world. (In the role of the couple’s second victim, Mary Jane Highby is just heartbreaking.) Ray is a bit of ludicrous figure, with his swagger and his exagerated accent but he’s been able to get away with his crimes because people want him to be the charming gentleman that he claim to be.  Even after Martha discovers who he really is, she still finds herself under the spell of Ray’s con.

Shirley Stoler and Tony Lo Bianco both give excellent performances as Martha and Ray, with Stoler especially doing a good job in the role of Martha.  At first, it’s easy to feel sorry for Martha.  At the start of the movie, she’s just as lonely as any of Ray’s victims.  At the film progresses, Martha’s true self is revealed and yet, as soulless as she can be, her love for Ray is strangely sincere.  As Ray, Tony Lo Bianco is all swagger and charm until he loses control of the situation and he reveals just how spineless he actually is.

The film presents Martha Beck and Ray Fernandez as a couple who became murderers after they found each other.  In reality, it’s suspected that Ray Fernandez murdered at least one woman before he met Martha and it’s also been suggested that Martha killed a few patients while she was working as a nurse.  Ray and Martha were both executed on the same day, going to electric chair on March 8th, 1951.

Horror Film Review: Oasis of the Zombies (dir by Jesus Franco)


1982’s Oasis of the Zombies opens with two girls in a jeep who just happen to be driving through the middle of a desert in Africa.  When they come across an oasis, they decided to stop so that they can walk around and allow the camera to focus on their rear ends as they explore the area while wearing short shorts.  Unfortunately, it turns out that they’re not very good when it comes observing details because they totally miss the skulls and the pieces of metal that have been decorated with swastikas.  One girl thinks that the oasis is creepy.  The other wants to keep exploring.  Decayed hands suddenly rise out of the ground and attack both of them.

(Oddly enough, the girls reminded me of myself and my BFF, Evelyn.  I called Evelyn after I watched the movie and we both agreed that getting attacked by desert zombies is definitely something that will probably happen to us in the near future.)

After the two girls are zombied, the film cuts to an old man named Captain Blabert (Javier Maiza) telling another man named Kurt Meitzell (either Henri Lambert or Eduardo Fajardo, depending on which version of the film you see) about a shipment of Nazi gold that, for the past few decades, has been sitting in the middle of an oasis in the desert.  Kurt kills Blabert and then heads off with his wife (Myriam Landson or Lina Romay, again depending on which version of the film you see) to track down the gold.

We then cut to London, where college student Robert Blabert (Manuel Gelin) receives not only a message informing him of the death of his father, Captain Blabert, but also a journal that leads to several flashbacks of Captain Blabert serving in Africa during World War II and getting involved with the Nazis and a sheik.

Eventually, Robert and several of his friends end up going to Morocco, where they randomly meet two filmmakers and everyone decides to head into the desert to search for the oasis and the gold.  Fortunately, the oasis and the gold are both easy to find.  However, the oasis is still defended by the Nazis who were assigned to transport the gold.  Of course, the Nazis are all zombies now!

Oasis of the Zombies is a Jesus Franco film and, like many of his later films, it’s more than a little disjointed.  The film’s scenes don’t always seem to follow any sort of conventional narrative logic.  Instead, the scenes often feel as if they’ve been randomly assembled and the end result is a low-budget zombie film that plays out like a fragmented dream, one that seems to feature more stock footage than actual plot.  Franco himself frequently seems as if he’s having trouble concentrating on just what exactly Oasis of the Zombies is supposed to be about.  Random zoom shots are mixed in with shots of a spider building its web and, more than once, the action comes to a stop so the film can turn into an extended travelogue.  As was so often the case with Franco’s later films, some of the shots are striking.  There’s a shot of a man standing on a roof announcing the call to prayer that achieves a surreal grandeur and, as bad as the zombie makeup is, the shots of the living dead silhouetted in the desert are effective.  But for every effective shot, there’s shots of people looking straight at the camera.  Franco was director who could both frame a memorable shot and also be remarkably sloppy.  As such, his aesthetic transcends conventional definitions of good and bad.  Viewers either get him and his semi-improvised excursions into existential horror or they don’t.

Myself, I thought there were enough good shots in Oasis of the Zombies to make it worth watching.  Certainly, it’s not comparable to Franco’s better films, like The Awful Dr. Orlof or Faceless.  But it’s also not quite as bad as its online reputation might suggest.  The zombies relentlessly emerging in the desert are creepy and, in its better moments, the film does capture the feeling of being stranded in the middle of nowhere.  One could argue that the film actually does have a deeper meaning, with the Nazi zombies representing the fact that, for all of its defeats, the hate that fueled the Nazis is still alive and still dangerous.  In the end, it’s a zombie flick, featuring less than impressive zombie makeup and some adequate gore and it’s undoubtedly a Jess Franco film.  There’s no mistaking Franco’s vision for anyone else’s.

Finally, there are two versions of the film.  The French-language version features Henri Lambert and Myriam Landson as Kurt and his wife.  The Spanish-language version features Franco regulars Eduardo Fajardo and Lina Romay as the couple.  Other than the scenes with Kurt, the two versions of Oasis of the Zombies are pretty much the same.  As far as I know, the French-language version is the only one that is available in the States.  That’s the one that I watched for this review.

Horror Film Review: Frogs (dir by George McGowan)


1972’s Frogs opens with Pickett Smith (played by a youngish Sam Elliott) canoeing through the bayou, taking pictures of all of the local sights.  Pickett is a nature photographer and someone who is very concerned about what pollution is doing to the local wildlife.  Eventually, Pickett ends up meeting the Crocketts, the wealthy family that owns and lives on an isolated island.  Wheelchair-bound family patriarch Jason Crockett (Ray Milland) is looking forward to celebrating the 4th of July.  It’s a tradition and he goes all out, decorating the mansion with American flags and listening to patriotic music.  The Crockett family always celebrates with Jason, though it quickly becomes apparent that Jason would be just as comfortable celebrating without any of them.

The last thing that Jason Crockett wants is some preachy environmentalist showing up at his mansion and ruining the 4th of July with a bunch of complaints about the pesticides that he’s been using to keep away the island’s wildlife.  The only thing worse than having to deal with an environmentalist would be having to deal with an invasion of alligators, snakes, and frogs.  Unfortunately, Jason is going to have to spend his holiday dealing with all of those things.  Soon, the mansion is surrounded by frogs and servants and family members are showing up dead all over the place.

I’ve seen Frogs a handful of times.  It’s one of those films that many of my friends seem to like much more than I do.  I have to admit that, for whatever reason, I always find myself struggling to focus on the film.  Some of that is because there are more than a few slow spots.  But the main problem is that frogs really aren’t that menacing.  Frogs are cute and kind of goofy-looking, much like Sam Elliott without his mustache.  The alligators are certainly scary.  And there’s an attack by a cottonmouth that makes me go, “Agck!” every time that I see it.  But frogs just look cute when they start hopping around.  Our cat gets excited whenever he sees a frog because he knows that he can put his paw on their back and make them jump. Frogs aren’t threatening but I suspect that’s probably the point of the film.  Frogs is not a film that is meant to be taken too seriously and all of the close-ups of the frogs staring at Ray Milland, Sam Elliott, Joan Van Ark, and Adam Roarke are obviously meant to be more humorous than scary.  By the end of the film, the frogs are hopping over American flags, like a group of rebellious amphibians that have decided to stage their own 1968 Democratic Convention.

The majority of the cast is adequate if not exactly outstanding, with most of them doing what they can to try to look terrified of a bunch of frogs.  That said, the only one who really makes a strong impression is Ray Milland, who appears to relish the opportunity to play someone who dislikes literally everyone that he sees.  As played by Milland, Jason is so honest about being a miserable old man that it’s hard not to like him.  He doesn’t like humanity and he’s not going to pretend otherwise.  One gets the feeling that, when this film was released, he was meant to represent the same establishment that got America into Vietnam.  When viewed today, he comes across like the one person who would be smart enough to never get on social media.

Reportedly, this was one of Andy Warhol’s favorite films.  I’m glad he enjoyed it.

Horror Film Review: House of Frankenstein (dir by Erle C. Kenton)


House of Frankenstein opens in a prison.  Dr. Gustav Neimann (Boris Karloff), the bother of one of Baron Frankenstein’s assistants, has been convicted of robbing graves and attempting to carry on the Baron’s work.  Dr. Neimann’s faithful assistant is the hunchback, Daniel (J. Carroll Naish).  Daniel is loyal to Neimann because Neimann has promised to someday place Daniel’s brain in a stronger body.

When a sudden earthquake allows Neimann and Daniel to escape, they waste no time in getting revenge on Neimann’s enemies.  First, they murder a traveling showman named Prof. Lampini (George Zucco) and steal both his identity and his mobile horror exhibit.  Included in the exhibit is a coffin that Lampini claimed held the skeleton of Dracula.  (There’s even a stake sticking out of the skeleton’s chest.)  When Neimann returns to his original hometown, he removes the stake from the skeleton so that he might use it on the Burgomaster, Hussman (Sig Ruman).  The skeleton transforms into Dracula (John Carradine).  Because he is relieved to have been brought back to life, Dracula does not attack Neimann but instead agrees to help Neimann get revenge on Hussman in return for Neimann looking after his coffin.  Dracula soon learns that he should have thought twice before trusting either Neimann or Daniel.

Neimann moves on, stopping off at Frankenstein’s village and recovering the bodies of both Frankenstein’s Monster (Glenn Strange) and Larry Talbot (Lon Chaney, Jr.) from the frozen chamber in which they were trapped at the end of Frankenstein Meets The Wolf Man.  Revived from suspended animation, Larry immediately starts whining about how much his life sucks.  (I love The Wolf Man but subsequent films turned Larry into the whiniest of the Universal monsters.)  Neimann promises to put Larry’s brain in a new body if he helps to revive the Monster.  Larry agrees.  Meanwhile, Daniel falls in love with a gypsy girl named Ilonka (Elena Verdugo) while Ilonka falls in love with Larry.  Daniel wants Neimann to put his brain in Larry’s body, Larry won’t stop whining about the approaching full moon, and the villagers are getting suspicious!

House of Frankenstein has never been a favorite of critics or horror historians and the film does have its share of flaws.  For instance, though it would have been fun to see Bela Lugosi return to his signature role, John Carradine seems like ideal casting for Dracula.  Unfortunately, Dracula is only in the film for about ten minutes and he comes to an end that really doesn’t feel worthy of a character of his stature.  The film reduces Larry Talbot to just being a dumb lug who won’t stop feeling sorry for himself.  Finally, Glenn Strange has the right physique for the Monster but, much as with John Carradine, he is underused.

That said, I still enjoyed House of Frankenstein.  A lot of that is because of Boris Karloff, who brings a lot of sly humor to his performance as the mad scientist.  (That said, Karloff himself later said that he did the role solely for the money and was bored with the whole thing.)  J. Carroll Naish turns Daniel into a rather sympathetic henchman, one who is so desperate to be “normal” that he’s willfully blinded himself to the fact that Neiman really doesn’t care about anyone other than himself.  (In many ways, he’s the equivalent of the hapless characters that Michael Ripper later played for Hammer Films.)  Finally, Elena Verdugo brings a lot of life to the stock role of the dancing gypsy girl who falls in love with Larry Talbot despite the fact that Larry is kind of a dumb lug.

For a modern viewer, the main appeal of House of Frankenstein is that it is one of the original Universal horror films, even if it came out long after the first Dracula and Frankenstein films.  As such, it has all the things that we associate with and love about those films.  There’s a ruined castle.  There’s angry villagers.  The cast is full of Universal horror mainstays, including Lionel Atwell and Anne Gwynne.  And, yes, the film features a mob descending on the castle with torches.  Flaws and all, House of Frankenstein is an enjoyable time capsule.  It’s a horror film from a far more innocent age and it’s one that remains a fun watch.

Previous Universal Horror Reviews:

  1. Dracula (1931)
  2. Dracula (Spanish Language Version) (1931)
  3. Frankenstein (1931)
  4. Island of Lost Souls (1932)
  5. The Mummy (1932)
  6. The Invisible Man (1933)
  7. The Bride of Frankenstein (1935)
  8. Dracula’s Daughter (1936)
  9. Son of Frankenstein (1939)
  10. The Wolf Man (1941)
  11. Ghost of Frankenstein (1942)
  12. Frankenstein Meets The Wolf Man (1943)
  13. Son of Dracula (1943)
  14. Creature From The Black Lagoon (1954)

Out There, (Dir Uncertain), Review by Case Wright


Welcome! Welcome! Welcome! Happy Horrorthon! It’s October!!! Yes, I passed my engineering classes last year; so, I will be working for Big Oil. Huh, my mother works for Big Pharma and I work for Big Oil – hmmm if only I could get my daughters into banking; then, we could finally bring about He Who Shall Sit At The Head of All Tables……BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Sorry, I digress. I’m beginning this Horrorthon with a scathing review, but sometimes people just aren’t good at things. “Out There” is 4 minutes and 21 seconds long and I can’t write that everything Laila Iravani did was terrible because in the first 20 seconds there is a title card and everything was spelled correctly; so, there’s that. The other positive is that it was only over 4 minutes long. I had a mild COVID heart attack in 2021 and I think that the heart attack was about the same amount of time….maybe this film was even shorter than my heart attack? So, this film was briefer than that.

“Out There” was a story because there were characters, people, and I guess somethings happened. There were three or four bad actors who kind of could not go outside or the movie would skip. I really couldn’t write about the plot because I would have to do a lot of Laila Iravani’s work for her. Hold on, I’m really trying to be positive…the camera appeared to be on the whole time. There, I did it!

I can’t say that I’m sad after watching this because I love October and maybe like some other years this is the year of the crap short film. I think it’s Alex Magana creep because he makes terrible films and other people are like – “Hey, I’m bad at things too! I’m gonna make something terrible and Case will have to review and I HATE him already without knowing him because he likes art and this will be the opposite of that.” Laila Iravani you made me hurt a little, but only for 4 minutes and 21 seconds! So, Yay?

I got a note that Laila Iravani might not have made this terrible film. Laila, I’m glad that you did not do this. Supposedly, it’s in a film festival circuit going round and round and round. Hopefully, it will stay within the circuit and not spread to the greater world. It is really terrible. I’m not sure who made this terrible film, but maybe that’s sort of its mythos? Maybe, “Out There” is like one of the old ones such as Cthulhu- it has always been …. Waiting and once it finishes the film festival circuitry, it shall be released to the greater world and devour all of mankind????

Horror on the Lens: The Avenging Conscience (dir by D.W. Griffith)


Hi there and welcome to October!  This is our favorite time of the year here at the Shattered Lens because October is our annual horrorthon!  For the past several years (seriously, we’ve been doing this for a while), we have celebrated every October by reviewing and showing some of our favorite horror movies, shows, books, and music.  That’s a tradition that I’m looking forward to helping to continue this year.

This year, we’re getting things started with a movie that has been called “the first American horror film.”  In 1914, D.W. Griffith released The Avenging Conscience, a melodrama that was based on Edgar Allan Poe’s The Tell-Tale Heart and Annabel Lee.  In this film, The Nephew (Henry B. Walthall) falls in love with the Sweetheart (Blanche Sweet).  However, the Uncle (Spottiswoode Aiken) is opposed to the relationship, mostly because the Sweetheart is a “common” woman.  Despite having been raised by the Uncle, the Nephew snaps and murders him.  The Nephew then finds himself tortured not just by his own guilt and fear but also by vivid hallucinations.  This is a film that invites us to come for the murder and stay for the reminder that “Thou Shalt Not Kill.”

Like a lot of the films of the silent era, it will require a bit of patience on the part of modern viewers.  It takes a while to get going but the surreal imagery and Henry B. Walthall’s increasingly unhinged performance make it worth sticking with.  If nothing else, the film’s historical significance makes it one worthy to be seen by all serious horror fans.

Enjoy!