The Adventures of a History Nerd: Season Finale: The Unexpected Rise and Fall of the WB and UPN by Susanne Daniels and Cynthia Littleton


I miss the WB.

The so-called fifth television network launched in 1995 and ceased operations in 2006. That’s when the WB merged with the sixth television network, UPN, and became known as the CW. (The CW still exists, even though I haven’t watched it since they canceled Dynasty in 2022.) The WB never got much respect from the critics, even though some very important shows aired on the network. Buffy the Vampire Slayer was a WB show. So were Angel, Charmed, Felicity, One Tree Hill, Supernatural, Gilmore Girls, 7th Heaven, Roswell, Smallville, and What I Like About You. Most critics usually considered those shows the exception to the rule. They were the shows that aired in between stuff like Beauty and the Geek and Nick Freno: Licensed Teacher. Well, that’s fine. For those of us of a certain age, it didn’t matter that the WB aired a lot of shows that only lasted a few weeks. What mattered is that the network was home to the shows we planned our nights around.

Critically, UPN got even less respect than the WB. I associated the channel with Star Trek and professional wrestling, neither of which held much appeal for me in the aughts. However, when Buffy switched from the WB to UPN, I followed it to its new network. I watched Veronica Mars and idolized the title character. I watched America’s Next Top Model and cheered for any model who had the guts to talk back to the judges.

The 2006 merger between the two networks hit me harder than it probably should have. I had grown up with the WB and UPN as scrappy rivals, two networks that were continually battling for fifth place. They were the networks that aired shows that seemed to actually speak to what I was going through in my life at the time. It almost felt like a sacrilege to have the two networks come together. Even though some of my favorite shows continued on the CW, things just never felt the same. If the WB and UPN felt like cocky upstarts, the CW seemed like something that had been born out of defeat.

First published in 2007, Season Finale: The Unexpected Rise and Fall of the WB and UPN is a look at the short but colorful history and rivalry of the WB and UPN. Co-author Susanne Daniels was the president of entertainment at the WB, so it’s not surprising that the book tends to go into more detail about the WB’s operations than UPN’s. It makes for an entertaining read. Daniels writes like someone who truly loves television, and the book has plenty of behind-the-scenes information about the shows I grew up with. If nothing else, the WB sounds like it was a fun place to work. UPN, meanwhile, sounds like it was a place where everyone was continually jealous of the WB and also stressed over having to defend programming like Shasta McNasty and The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer.

The book is only 19 years old, but there are times when it feels like an artifact from a distant age. It was written before #MeToo, before woke, even before the rise of streaming. When I recently reread it, I found myself cringing when I reached the section about the creation and casting of 7th Heaven. The original choice for the role of the saintly Reverend Camden was Beau Bridges, but Bridges turned out to be too expensive. When an executive mentions Stephen Collins, the response is: “I’ve always liked him.”

AGCK!

Of course, today that’s not something anyone would voluntarily say about Stephen Collins. But in 2007 he still had that image of being the type of nice, down-to-earth guy you’d be happy to have as a neighbor. Reading the book reminded me of just how shocked almost everyone was when Collins’s ex-wife first released the tapes of him admitting to inappropriately touching a minor. At the time, I think a lot of people assumed Collins was somehow being set up because that just wasn’t the image he had at all. Of course, Collins himself later admitted it was true.

The book is full of people who have since fallen from grace, and as such it becomes very tempting to try to read between the lines. Joss Whedon is described as being talented but intense, and reading about him reminded me of just how much some of us used to really respect Whedon and his shows. (For the record, I grew disenchanted with Whedon in December of 2016 when he tweeted that it was offensive to say “Happy holidays” because, for him, “they won’t be.” Get over yourself, Joss.) Les Moonves shows up toward the end of the book, and there are frequent references to his reputation for being a hard-driving boss. Even Harvey and Bob Weinstein make a cameo appearance, sending two of their goons down to basically hold Dawson’s Creek creator Kevin Williamson hostage until he finished a rewrite on Scream 2. Reading about Collins, Whedon, and Moonves serves to make you appreciate people like Williamson, Amy Sherman-Palladino, and even Aaron Spelling, all of whom come across as relatively well-adjusted creative people.

Toward the end of the book, Susanne Daniels writes about going to the Emmys with her husband, producer Greg Daniels. The Office wins its only Emmy for Outstanding Comedy Series and Suzanne watches as Greg joins his college friend Conan O’Brien on stage. It’s a sweet moment but also one that, when read today, reminds us of just how much things have changed over the past two decades. Network shows no longer win Emmys. The Office fell apart after NBC boss Jeff Zucker (in a move that feels like it could have been lifted from the early days of UPN) decided not to offer Steve Carell a new contract. The Office was eventually rediscovered when it started streaming on Netflix, and even today people are more likely to remember it as a show they binged online than one they watched every week on NBC. When the book first came out, I shared Susanne Daniels’s frustration over the WB becoming the CW. Today, when I read it, I feel bad for whoever decided to launch a new network right on the edge of the streaming era.

Season Finale is a compulsively readable portrait of the way things once were. Thanks for the memories.

 

Film Review: Scream 4 (dir. by Wes Craven)


Before I start, note that Scream 4 is also referred to as Scre4m. While this is true and cool in a hacking/cyberpunk sort of way, I refuse to call it that as it just erodes my writing ability (which is rough enough as it is). I keep that up by the end of the year, everything I write will have numbers in it.

Compared to some of his earlier attempts, Scream 4 is pretty much a triumph for Wes Craven. With Kevin Williamson’s help, they manage to take the fourth part of a story and turn it into something remarkably enjoyable and surprising. The audience at my showing loved the way it started and ended. Although it retreads some of the older themes of the series, it does so in a way that almost makes fun of itself and the genre it’s a part of. Since it’s not taking itself too seriously, the audience doesn’t have to either.

Scream 4 basically brings what’s left of the remaining cast back to the tale. The Arquette’s (Courtney Cox and David) have returned as Gail Weathers-Riley and Sheriff Dewey Riley, respectively. Neve Campbell returns to form after a long hiatus, and really, it’s almost as if none of them ever left. The film starts off in a way where it pays homage to the original Drew Barrymore opening while still managing to keep it fresh. Cameos by Anna Paquin and Kristen Bell help to move that along.

After the events of the last three films (ten years of time in the movie), Sidney Prescott (Campbell) has managed to put her life back together by writing a novel about being a survivor. Thanks to Gail’s book on the Woodsboro murders and the multiple “Stab” movies that were created for them, the town has become famous for something it really shouldn’t be. Ghostface masks are a dime a dozen now, yearly Stab marathons are all the rage and the town kind of looks at it all like Crystal Lake – people died there, sure, but it’s just so much to say “I was there!”.

Sidney’s fame did little for her niece, Jill (Emma Roberts) and her friends, Kirby (a short hairdo wearing Hayden Panettiere) and Olivia (Marielle Jaffe). Having to grow up as a relative to the most famous person in town means everyone has something to ask her about Sidney when she returns to Woodsboro on her book tour. The younger trio keep their distance from Sidney as they consider her trouble. After all, all these deaths seem to occur when she’s around or has something to do with her. However, when a new rash of murders start when Sidney arrives, everyone has something to worry about. What follows is a bloodbath in typical Scream fashion, and as always, just about everyone is a suspect.

The Positives:

– Conspiracy Theory

What worked for me in Scream 4 was the conspiracy aspect. Williamson paints a picture that basically says “Here’s your cast. Any one of them could be the killer. Can you figure out who?”. The misdirection isn’t on a Harry Potter like level, but it does serve a purpose here. By the time everything was brought out, I found myself nodding and smiling. It’s actually worth it to ride out the movie to get to the big reveal. Without giving anything away, both that reveal and the story behind it was damn near excellent.

-Sidney as Ripley

Another good thing about the film is that Sidney is pretty much a powerhouse here. She takes on the Ghostface without too much fear. So much so that it sometimes seems like she’s like a Jason Bourne type character. It’s nice that she’s able to hold her own, though after 3 films, you’d expect the character to probably do that.

– Remembering the Original

Another element that proved useful was the homages to the original Scream films. There are a few scenes that even if you only watched the Original Scream, you’ll recognize them instantly. Some serious recognition goes to Panettiere’s Kirby, who at one point spits out the name of nearly 30 horror films in the space of a minute. All in all, it might seem like rehashing, but the context they were set up in were enough to warrant a whispered “Wow” from me. Maybe I’m just easily impressed. Craven also managed to bring back Roger L. Jackson (Mojo Jojo from The Powerpuff Girls) as the voice of the Ghostface Killer. So much fun to hear his voice again after all these years. That was definitely a plus.

The Negatives:

– Not a lot of Bodies Hitting the Floor.

If Scream 4 suffers from any problems, it’s that there really isn’t that much of a body count. Granted, I wasn’t expecting anything like Dead Alive or Dawn of the Dead, but as slasher films go, it’s pretty light on the numbers, and as always, most of the people who are dispatched are done well, but I left the theatre wondering if there weren’t just a few more people who could have been taken out. That, and outside of the main players, I didn’t really care about the rest of the cast. They were pretty much cannon fodder for Ghostface.

– The Rules have Changed, but aren’t Exactly Enforced

While the movie seemed to be big on changing what the rules for how horror movies go, they weren’t really mind-blowing. In some ways, it seemed it was useful, but perhaps it would have been better to simply say that there were no rules and leave it at that. The rules here didn’t seem as enforced as the first film. Anything kind of goes.

Overall, Scream 4 is a fun ride, and quite possibly the best entry in the series since the first Scream. It peppers original elements with a few new ideas. It’s not all perfect and there some moments that are over the top, but in the end, it’s refreshing when compared to the 2nd and 3rd parts of the series.