4 Shots From 4 Horror Films: 1950s Part Two


This October, I’m going to be doing something a little bit different with my contribution to 4 Shots From 4 Films.  I’m going to be taking a little chronological tour of the history of horror cinema, moving from decade to decade.

Today, we continue to look at the 1950s.

4 Shots From 4 Horror Films

La Bruja (1954, dir by Chano Urueta)

La Bruja (1954, dir by Chano Urueta)

Cult of the Cobra (1955, dir by Francis D. Lyon)

Cult of the Cobra (1955, dir by Francis D. Lyon)

Dementia (1955, dir by John Parker)

Dementia (1955, dir by John Parker)

The She Creature (1956, dir by Edward L. Cahn)

The She Creature (1956, dir by Edward L. Cahn)

Horror Film Review: Willy’s Wonderland (dir by Kevin Lewis)


2021’s Willy’s Wonderland takes place in an dilapidated restaurant.

Back in the day, Willy’s Wonderland was the ideal place to go if you were young and celebrating your birthday.  The animatronic mascots would sing “Happy birthday” and maybe meet your parents.  Willy Weasel, Arty Alligator, Cammy Chameleon, Ozzie Ostrich, Tito Turtle, Knighty Knight, Gus Gorilla, and Siren Sara promised fun and cheesy entertainment to anyone looking for a nice family meal!

Unfortunately, people stopped going to Willy’s once it was discovered that the owner was a serial killer.  Jerry Robert Willis (Grant Cramer) and his seven friends were cannibals who regularly sacrificed families.  Eventually, the police caught up to him but, even under new ownership, no one wanted to eat at Willy’s.  There were rumors that Willis and his friends had transferred their souls into the animatronic figures but surely, that could not have been true!

Right?

Nicolas Cage plays a man with no name.  When his car breaks down, the local mechanic agrees to fix the car if the man agrees to spend the night as the janitor at Willy’s.  Apparently, it’s been a struggle to keep a night janitor at the place.  People find the location to be creepy and, of course, the animatronic mascots keep killing anyone dumb enough to try to mop the floors.  Cage’s man with no name silently agrees.  Everything that Cage does, he does without a word.  This is one of the rare films where Nicolas Cage, usually a champion talker, says absolutely nothing.

Now, I should mention that there actually is a plot to Willy’s Wonderland.  Liv (Emily Tosta) and her friends are trying to burn the place down because, years ago, Liv’s parents were murdered by the mascots.  Unfortunately, Liv and her friends aren’t that smart and they end up trapped in Willy’s Wonderland.  The majority of them quickly fall victim to the mascots.  The deaths are appropriately gruesome, though tinged with the dark humor that would come from essentially being killed by a knock-off version of Chuck E. Cheese.

But really, the plot isn’t important.  This film is entirely about Nicolas Cage, playing a man with no name.  Cage takes the janitorial job and, over the course of the night, he battles the mascots.  At the same time, he also makes it a point to continue to do his job.  Besieged or not, he agreed to clean the place up.  He takes his breaks and plays pinball exactly as scheduled, even if that means abandoning Liv and her friends.  Normally, you might think that this would be bad behavior on the part of Cage’s character.  Abandoning someone in the middle of a battle is not usually encouraged.  But Liv and her friends are very annoying.  Cage is ultimately the hero by default.  Yes, he’s fighting and killing the mascots but he’s really only doing it because they’re getting in his way while he’s trying to do his job.  The fact that he helps out Liv is largely coincidental.

Willy’s Wonderland proves that Cage doesn’t need a lot of lines to be the center of a film.  Even without speaking, he’s such a wonderfully eccentric presence that you can’t help but watch him and cheer him on.  Admittedly, Willy’s Wonderland is never that scary, though the “Happy Birthday” song is definitely creepy.  The mascots are a bit too cartoonish to be truly frightening.  But, if the film doesn’t really work as a horror film, it does work as an adrenaline-fueled Cage match.  And that’s nearly as good.

Monday Live Tweet Alert: Join Us for The Satanic Rites of Dracula!


As some of our regular readers undoubtedly know, I am involved in hosting a few weekly live tweets on twitter and occasion ally Mastodon.  I host #FridayNightFlix every Friday, I co-host #ScarySocial on Saturday, and I am one of the five hosts of Mastodon’s #MondayActionMovie!  Every week, we get together.  We watch a movie.  We snark our way through it.

Tonight, for #MondayActionMovie, the film will be The Satanic Rites of Dracula!  So, if you missed the #ScarySocial live tweet, I guess this is your second chance.

It should make for a night of fun viewing and I invite all of you to join in.  If you want to join the live tweets, just hop onto Mastodon, pull up The Satanic Rites of Dracula on YouTube, start the movie at 8 pm et, and use the #MondayActionMovie hashtag!

Enjoy!

Horror Film Review: The Vampire Bat (dir by Frank R. Strayer)


In 1933’s The Vampire Bat, people are dying in a small German village, victims of blood loss.  A woman named Martha Mueller (Rita Carlisle) was recently attacked by a bat, leading to rumors of a vampire.  When the local town eccentric, a twitchy man named Hermann Glieb (Dwight Frye), argues that bats are actually harmless and admits that he likes bats because they are “soft” and “nice,” people start to suspect that he might be the vampire.  Another man named Kringen (George E. Stone) claims that he was attacked by a vampire and insinuates that it was Glieb.  Glieb may seems like a strange man who likes to collect bats but could he be something even more sinister?

Two town leaders have opposite feelings about the claim that a vampire is attacking the town.  Karl Brettschneider (Melvyn Douglas) is the local police inspector and he deals with facts.  He doesn’t believe in superstition and he initially scoffs at the idea that a vampire is attacking the village.  Meanwhile, Dr. Otto von Niemann (Lionel Atwill) is the town’s doctor.  He’s been treating the victims of the bat attacks and he’s even be letting some of his patients live at his home.  Everyone knows that Dr. von Neimann is a kindly man of science.  Karl is even dating Ruth (Fay Wray), one of Otto’s boarders.  But is the doctor as benevolent as everyone assumes?

When answering that question, consider these four facts:

  1.  Dr. von Neimann is the one who encouraged Kringen to spread stories about a vampire haunting the town, despite the fact that Kringen himself said that he didn’t want to start a panic.
  2. Dr. van Niemann is played by Lionel Atwill.
  3. Glieb is played by Dwight Frye.
  4. Karl is played by Melvyn Douglas.

Indeed, for horror fans, the casting of Lionel Atwill gives the game away.  Lionel Atwill appeared in a number of horror films and it was rare that he wasn’t cast as the villain.  (One of his non-villainous role was as the one-armed Inspector Krogh in The Son of Frankenstein.)  From the minute the viewer sees Atwill, he seem to give off sinister vibes and it’s not really a surprise when he turns out to be less than trustworthy.

As for Dwight Frye, horror fans love him for playing a number of unhinged weirdos, like Renfield in the Lugosi-version of Dracula and the torch-bearing servant in Karloff’s Frankenstein.  Frye was good at playing twitchy types but one thing that all of Frye’s characters had in common is that they were pretty much destined to be victims.  Even when Frye played an unlikeable character,  like in Frankenstein, it was obvious that he was going to end up getting killed at the hands of the Monster.

Finally, Melvyn Douglas was the epitome of propriety in every film in which he appeared.  If Douglas thinks that there is something more going on than just a vampire attacking people, there probably is.  And since we know Douglas can’t be the main bad guy, that pretty much just leaves Lionel Atwill.

The Vampire Bat is a short and enjoyable B-movie that puts an interesting spin on the typical vampire legend.  Though the budget may be low, the cast of Atwill, Douglas, Frye, and Wray can’t be beat and all of them give fully committed performances.  Dwight Frye, in particular, gives one of his best performance as the unfortunate Glieb.  As always, Lionel Atwill makes for an entertaining villain.  At its best, The Vampire Bat comments on the power of hysteria.  Convinced that there is a vampire in their midst, the town goes mad and it directs its anger towards those who are seen as being on the outside, men like Glieb.

The Vampire Bat is more than worthy of your Halloween viewing.

Horror Book Review: The Cipher (by Kathe Koja)


Kathe Koja’s The Cipher stands as a landmark achievement in splatterpunk and psychological horror, noted for its unapologetic dive into existential dread, fragmented narrative, and raw emotional landscape. Its reputation as a genre-defining work is well-earned, yet it also represents a demanding reading experience that diverges sharply from more traditional horror novels. For readers looking for straightforward thrills or clear-cut storytelling, Koja’s novel may feel opaque or even impenetrable. However, for those willing to engage deeply, The Cipher offers a poetic and unsettling exploration of alienation, obsession, and the unknowable.

At the heart of the novel’s challenge is Koja’s distinctive writing style. Eschewing conventional chapter structures or linear storytelling, The Cipher operates as an immersive psychological tapestry woven through the fragmented consciousness of its protagonist, Nicholas. The prose flows in long, often unruly sentences filled with impressionistic and surreal imagery that echo Nicholas’s damaged, chaotic inner world. His thoughts, memories, and anxieties drift in and out of focus, making the narrative feel like a fever dream or an inside-out nightmare. For readers new to literary horror or those more comfortable with clear plots and defined characters, this style can seem alienating and difficult to parse. The book frequently moves between blurred timelines, hallucinations, and raw emotional bursts, challenging the reader to accept ambiguity and psychological discomfort rather than easy narrative anchors.

The story revolves around Nicholas and Nakota, a dysfunctional and toxic couple trapped in a bleak urban environment that acts almost as a third character. This grim unnamed city, reminiscent of the American Rust Belt in decay during the early 1990s, exudes a cold, oppressive atmosphere that mirrors the emotional desolation of its residents. The setting’s grime and desolation bolster the novel’s themes of hopelessness and fragmentation, with Koja’s spare prose turning every scene into a sensory experience of discomfort and decay.

Central to the plot—and the horror—is the discovery of the Funhole, a mysterious and unnaturally black void located in a storage room of the apartment building. Hardly celebrated for whimsy, the Funhole is a locus of enigmatic and malevolent power that both fascinates and consumes. Nicholas and Nakota’s experiments with the Funhole—dropping insects, animals, and eventually cameras—reveal its capacity to distort and corrupt physical reality in grotesque ways, leading to disturbing mutations and aberrations. However, the real horror lies not just in these transformations but in the obsessive pull the Funhole exerts on the characters, particularly Nakota’s increasingly toxic fixation and Nicholas’s reluctant fascination.

Rather than relying on external action or traditional plot progression, The Cipher roots its terror in the psychological and emotional unraveling of its characters. The story is less about what happens and more about how it feels to fall apart in the face of an unknowable force. The degradation of Nicholas and Nakota’s relationship—marked by manipulation, dependency, and alienation—is the emotional thread binding the novel’s narrative chaos. This internal focus demands patience and a willingness to sit with discomfort from the reader; those unaccustomed to introspective or experimental fiction might find the experience frustrating or exhausting.

Overlaying all this is a strong vein of cosmic horror. The Funhole is presented as an unknowable abyss, an entity without explanation, echoing the eldritch voids found in the works of Lovecraft, Blackwood, and Machen. It refuses to comply with human curiosity or understanding, warping reality and identity in ways that defy definition. Unlike classic monster tales, the horror here is existential and diffuse, manifesting as a dark reflection of humanity’s inability to grasp the true nature of the universe or even themselves. In this respect, Koja’s work is a meditation on obsession and transformation, where the boundary between cosmic indifference and personal disintegration disappears.

While The Cipher has been celebrated for its ambition and literary risks, it offers little reprieve in terms of character likability or narrative closure. The protagonists are deeply flawed, often unlikable people caught in spirals of self-destruction. The novel’s resolution is ambiguous and bleak, leaving the audience with more questions than answers, emphasizing themes of loss, transformation, and the unknowable. It challenges standard genre expectations and eschews easy emotional satisfaction, positioning itself as a novel that unsettles rather than comforts.

Readers familiar with the edgier corners of horror fiction—fans of Clive Barker’s visceral fantasies or Poppy Z. Brite’s explorations of identity and desire—will find much to admire in Koja’s approach. The novel’s body horror is not gratuitous but symbolic, a metaphysical cracked mirror reflecting profound anxieties about embodiment, control, and alienation. Its grim realism and morally complex characters resonate alongside challenging literary experiments such as Fight Club and House of Leaves, where mental and existential crises are front and center.

In sum, Kathe Koja’s The Cipher stands as a bold, uncompromising exploration of despair, obsession, and cosmic terror wrapped in a chaotic, poetic narrative. It demands engagement on a deep level, rewarding readers with a unique experience that expands the scope of horror fiction. This is a novel best suited for those who prize atmosphere, psychological depth, and existential questioning over conventional scares or plot-driven horror. While it may prove inaccessible or taxing for some, for others it offers a transformative journey into the dark, tangled spaces of the mind and the universe—an unsettling masterpiece that lingers long after the final page is turned.

Horror On The Lens: Where Have All The People Gone? (dir by John Llewellyn Moxey)


In the creepy 1974 film, Peter Graves plays a father who goes on a camping trip with his two teenage children (one of whom is played by Kathleen Quinlan).  A sudden earthquake and a solar flare causes the trio to try to return to civilization, where they discover that almost everyone has been reduced to a powdery substance and there are only a few crazed survivors.  They try to make their way back to their home in Malibu, facing danger at every leg of their journey.

(It’s almost a low-budget and far more dramatic version of Night of the Comet.)

Effective despite its made-for-TV origins, Where Have All The People Gone? was obviously mean to serve as a pilot for a television series.  The series didn’t happen but, even with a somewhat open-ended conclusion, the movie still works.

 

6 Trailers For October 13th, 2025


For today’s edition of Lisa Marie’s Favorite Grindhouse And Exploitation Film Trailers, we share some trailers from the maestro of Italian horror, Mario Bava!

  1. Black Sunday (1960)

After starting his career as a cinematographer and a visual effects engineer, Mario Bava made his directorial debut with 1960’s Black Sunday, starring Barbara Steele!

2. Black Sabbath (1963)

In 1963, Bava directed one of his most popular films, the horror anthology Black Sabbath.  The trailer put the spotlight on the great Boris Karloff.

3. Planet of the Vampires (1965)

One of Bava’s best films, Planet of the Vampires, was later cited by many as an influence on the Alien films.

4. Bay of Blood (1971)

One of the first slasher films, Bay of Blood was also a social satire that featured Bava’s dark sense of humor.

5. The House of Exorcism (1974)

When it was released in the United States, Bava’s Lisa and the Devil was re-titled House of Exorcism and, after new scenes were filmed, sold as a rip-off to The Exorcist.

6. Shock (1977)

Bava’s final film as a director was Shock, which starred Daria Nicolodi as a woman who is being haunted by the ghost of her first husband.

Music Video of the Day: Devil Woman by Cliff Richard (1976, directed by ????)


Cliff Richard sings about how he became cursed after seeing a black cat with yellow eyes.  Cliff went to a fortune teller, asking her to lift the curse but it turned out that the fortune teller was the one who cursed him in the first place!

The message?  If it can happen to Cliff Richard, it can happen to anyone.

Enjoy!

So, I Watched The Descent Part 2 (2009, Dir. by Jon Harris)


The Descent Part 2: Back to the Cave!

That’s what I would have called it.

Sarah (Shauna Macdonald) goes back to the caves that she barely escaped from during the first Descent to help the police look for the remains of her friends.  Sarah is suspected of killing all of them so I don’t think the police would have gone into a narrow cave with her.  Sarah was also traumatized by what happened in the cave so I don’t think she would voluntarily go back down there either.  As soon as they enter the cave, they get attacked by the crawlers.  What did they think would happen?

I loved the first Descent because it was a horror film that featured interesting and multi-layered women who weren’t just put on screen to be whimpering victims.  When I watched The Descent, I was just as invested in the personal drama as I was the horror in the caves.  I also liked that the first Descent left it open to interpretation about what actually happened in the cave.  The sequel didn’t really do that and it also didn’t add anything to the story.  Juno (Natalie Mendoza) returns but I’m not sure how considering what happened during the first movie.

The Descent Part 2 also shows a lot more of the crawlers than the first film did.  They’re much more visible and much more busy but they aren’t as scary once you can actually see them.  Plus revealing the crawlers as much as this movie does also ruins the ambiguity that I loved about the first Descent.

The Descent Part 2: More Splatter, Less Heart.

I should get a job writing tag lines.