International Horror Film Review: Pieces (dir by J. Piquer Simon)


It’s a strange world out there.

This 1982 Spanish-produced slasher film was advertised, at least in the United States, with the brilliant tag line: “You don’t have to go to Texas for a chainsaw massacre.”  And indeed, Pieces takes place in Boston, Massachusetts.  And yet, it’s a Boston that has little relation to the Boston of the real world.  (Some of that may be because, while a few scenes were filmed in Boston, the majority of the film was shot in Spain.)  Indeed, one can argue that Pieces takes place in an alternate reality, one that was created with bits of giallo suspense, slasher gore, and scenes randomly borrowed from every other exploitation film ever made.

In the 1950s, a little boy wears a bowtie and plays with a pornographic jigsaw puzzle.  His mother takes the puzzle away from him, which he doesn’t appreciate at all.  It leads, as things usually do, to an axe murder.

In the 1980s, a college student tries to roller skate down a sidewalk, just to suddenly lose control.  As she helplessly rolls down the street, two workman carrying a sheet of glass just happen to step out in front of her.  Pieces of blood-stained glass fly everywhere.  As is typical of Pieces, this actually has nothing to do with the larger plot of the film.  We never learn the girl’s name.  We never hear learn if she survived nor do we hear much else about the accident.  Instead, it’s just a random incident, tossed in to illustrate that the world is going mad.

On campus, a chainsaw killer is killing students and teachers.  He’s the boy with the bowtie, all grown up.  He takes body parts home with him so that he can stitch them together, recreating the jigsaw puzzle that was stolen from him years before.  Oddly enough, he never makes much of an effort to hide his chainsaw.  He casually gets on an elevator with one of his victims.  She notices that he’s carrying a chainsaw but she doesn’t say anything about it until he actually turns it on.

Dean Foley (played by Eurohorror veteran Edmund Purdom) is upset that students keep getting dismembered on campus, as well he should be.  Lt. Bracken (Christopher George, barking out his lines with the same annoyed energy that he brought to Graduation Day) is also upset because he’s supposed to arrest criminals and stuff.  Unfortunately, all of Bracken’s cops are incredibly incompetent.  Bracken is forced to rely on the help of Kendall James (Ian Sera).  Despite being kind of scrawny and unappealing, Kendall is the most popular student on campus.  Kendall also knows every victim and discovers the majority of them.  You would think that Kendall would be the obvious suspect but instead, Kendall somehow ends up directing the entire investigation.  Kendall’s not a cop but he’s soon ordering around the veteran detectives and everyone’s okay with that.  (One detective even mentions that Kendall might as well be a part of the force.)

Lt. Backen decides that the best way to solve the case is to send in Mary Riggs (Linda Day George), who is not only an undercover cop but also a top-ranked tennis player!  There’s a lot of tennis in Pieces, as Mary works on her game in between working with Kendall to solve the murders.  Kendall and Mary aren’t very effective though.  After discovering that one victim was chopped in half in the showers while Kendall and Mary were trying to find the source of some loud marching band music, Mary lets the killer know exactly what she thinks of him.

But who is the killer?  Because Pieces was as inspired by the giallo genre as the slasher genre, there are several suspects.  Kendall seems like the obvious one but, for whatever reason, no one makes that connection.  Instead, we’re left to wonder if maybe it could be the Dean.  Or how about Prof. Brown (Jack Taylor), the somewhat odd professor who seems to be a bit repressed?  Or maybe it’s the handyman, Willard (Paul L. Smith)?  Willard is creepy and he works with a chainsaw!  There are a lot of suspects and helpfully, after a murder at the pool, every single one of them shows up at the scene of the crime.  At one point, they all even gather in the same corner and look straight at the camera.  You half expect Kendall to announce, “Well, I can’t possibly solve this one!  Can you?”

But that’s not all!  When Kendall and Mary aren’t solving murders, they’re having to deal with all of the other weird things that happen on campus.  At one point, Mary is randomly attacked by the school’s karate instructor.  After Kendall shows up and explains who the man in, they all laugh it off as being the result of “bad chop suey.”  Later, Kendall walks Mary back to her place and, after she rejects his attempts at romance, Kendall turns around to be confronted by another student who taunts him by yelling, “Casanova!”  Meanwhile, other students are still walking around campus in the middle of the night and making plans to meet up in a room that contain the height of campus luxury, a waterbed!

(Yes, a murder does occur on the waterbed.  Yes, water goes everywhere.  It’s Chekhov’s waterbed. You can’t introduce it without including a scene where it gets punctured.)

Many things happen, none of which make sense.  The entire film is so over-the-top in its combination of gore, overacting, and general absurdity that it becomes strangely fascinating.  From today’s perspective, it’s easy to imagine that the film was actually meant to be a parody but director J. Piquer Simon has said that it was meant to be viewed as a serious thriller, regardless of how the film was subsequently advertised in the United States.  Even the film’s ending, in which someone who is not the killer is randomly castrated just because, was meant to be taken seriously.  Every weird moment was included to give the audience what they wanted.  Audiences loved Bruce Lee so, of course, a random karate fight was tossed in.  People love chainsaws so, of course …. well, you get the idea.

On the one hand, Pieces is a really heavy-handed and mean-spirited film, one in which the victims are almost exclusively women and where sex and violence are too often connected.  Mary may be an absurd character but you’re happy when she shows up because she’s the one woman in the film not presented as being a passive victim.  On the other hand, Pieces is just so over-the-top and absurd that it’s hard not to watch the film all the way through.  Perhaps the only thing that keeps the film from being incredibly offensive is that, regardless of what the director has claimed, it is so obviously not meant to be taking place in the real world.  When that plate glass was shattered, it obviously opened a vortex that sucked the campus into a world where every slasher and giallo trope has been adapted to the point of absurdity.  This is one of those films that just gets more and more strange with each passing minute.  You watch it and you find yourself continually thinking, “This movie can’t get any weirder” and then it manages to do just that.  Watching the movie is like stepping through a portal into some sort of strange alternate reality.  Just try to look away.

Who could the murderer be?

4 Shots From 4 Bela Lugosi Films


 

4 Shots From 4 Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking.

139 years ago on this date, Bela Lugosi was born in Hungary.  Today, we honor his memory with….

4 Shots From 4 Bela Lugosi Films

Dracula (1931, dir by Tod Browning, DP; Karl Freund)

White Zombie (1932, dir by Vincent Halperin, DP: Arthur Martinelli)

Ninotchka (1939, dir by Ernst Lubitsch, DP: William H. Daniels)

Bride of The Monster (1955, dir by Ed Wood, DP: Ted Allan and William H. Thompson)

 

Horror Film Review: Slender Man (dir by Sylvain White)


Slender Man is a 2018 horror film about the Slender Man, the mysterious supernatural being who appears in online photographs and videos and who …. well, I’m not sure what it is that he does exactly.  Apparently, he targets children and teenagers and he uses his long arms to either abduct them or drive them crazy or maybe take them to a different realm of existence.  Who knows?  That’s actually probably a part of the appeal of Slender Man.  He can pretty much be whoever or whatever anyone wants him to be.

In this Massachusetts-set film, four teenage girl decided to summon the Slender Man.  Their ceremony works but it turns out that summoning a demonic figure who hunts children is not as good an idea as the girls originally assumed.  Who would have guessed it, right?  After one of the girls disappear, the other three try to figure out how to deal with Slender Man.  It all leads to death, insanity. and panic.  Yay!

Slender Man is one of those films where nearly every scene is severely underlit and it’s often difficult to actually tell what’s happening in each scene.  This has become a very popular technique in recent years, one that some directors have embraced almost to the point of absolute absurdity.  (Watch any horror-themed program on Netflix and you’ll see what I’m talking about.)  I imagine the idea is to create a creepy and shadowy atmosphere and to keep you wondering about what might be lurking in the darkness.  There’s nothing wrong with that, if the film itself is genuinely scary.  However, in a film like Slender Man, the underlit look feels rather lazy.  It’s as if the director and the cinematographer realized that the film’s story was never going to make sense so they specifically turned off the light to try to keep us from noticing.  Instead of trying to improve the script or maybe come up with something interesting for Slender Man to do, they instead did the cinematic equivalent of shoving the audience into a dark room, locking the door, and then shouting boo in the vain hope of tricking them into being scared.

Of course, a huge part of the problem with Slender Man is that real life is often scarier than anything that will ever appear in a movie.  In 2014, two teenage girls really did stab one of their friends and they did attempt to blame their crime on Slender Man, whom they claimed they were tying to impress.  This led to a moral panic, one in which parents worried that internet memes were turning children into sociopaths.  My own personal opinion is that if your child is stabbing one of their friends, they have problems that go far beyond anything they may have seen online.  Moral panics are a lot like Slender Man, in that they can be whatever the participants want them to be.  In this case, the panic over internet memes allowed parents the luxury of not reflecting on whether or not their own bad parenting has anything to do with the actions of their children.  “No,” parents could say, “it wasn’t that we raised a sociopath!  It’s that some anonymous user posted a silly picture of Slender Man peaking out from behind a tree!”  It is much easier to demand that a website be taken down or censored than to actually ask yourself why your children would be 1) stupid enough to believe in Slender Man in the first place and 2) eager to impress him.

Though Sony Pictures always denied it, it’s obvious that the Slender Man movie was made to capitalize on the publicity surrounding the Slender Man trial. Unfortunately, the film itself just isn’t scary.  It’s poorly paced, poorly acted, and way too dark.  No wonder Slender Man hasn’t been seen in a while….

Horror on the Lens: The Creeping Terror (dir by Vic Savage)


Watching The Creeping Terror is an October tradition here at the Shattered Lens.  How could anyone resist a film about a killer carpet, especially one that features a random dance party?  This film was directed by an enigmatic figure named Vic Savage.  No one is really sure who he actually was.  No one is sure what happened to him after The Creeping Terror was finally released.  But what we do know is that he made a film unlike any other.

Read my review here.

Read Patrick’s review here.

And enjoy the film!

Horror on TV: Friday the 13th: The Series 2.3 “And Now The News” (dir by Bruce Pittman)


Tonight, for our horror on the lens, we have the third episode of the 2nd season of Friday the 13th: The Series!

Kate Trotter plays a psychiatrist who, due to a cursed radio, is capable of helping even the most troubled of her patients! Unfortunately, for everyone that she helps, someone else has to die!

This episode originally aired on October 14th, 1988.

Horror Film Review: Fallen (dir by Gregory Hobilt)


“Time is on my side….” sings an ancient Sumerian demon, who is apparently a huge fan of the Rolling Stones.

“Do you like cream?” asks a possibly crooked detective who is played by a slightly less heavy than usual James Gandolfini.

Donald Sutherland walks through a shadowy police station and flashes his big smile.

A detective played by John Goodman talks on the phone and makes cheery jokes while investigating a brutal murder.

A demon jumps from person to person, possessing everyone for a matter of seconds, just so he can freak out one specific person.

“Beware my wrath,” a white-haired businessman says to Denzel Washington.

There’s no way to deny it.  1998’s Fallen is a film that’s full of strange moments.  Some of it works and some of its doesn’t but it’s never boring.  Denzel Washington plays John Hobbes, a Philadelphia detective who has achieved a small amount of fame as the result of capturing serial killer Edgar Reese (Elias Koteas).  Reese asks to see Hobbes before he’s executed and it turns out that, for a man about to pay the ultimate price for his crimes, he’s in a surprisingly good mood.  Before he goes in the gas chamber, Reese chants something in Aramaic.

Soon, new murders are being committed in Phladelphia.  Hobbes and his partner, Jonesey (John Goodman at his most Goodmanesque), suspect that the killer is a copycat, trying to capture some of Reese’s notoriety for himself.  Gretta Milano (Embeth Davidtz), the daughter of a detective who committed suicide after being accused of committing a series of murders, tells Hobbes that the new killings are actually being committed by a demon named Azazel.  Azazel can jump from body to body and can compel people to do terrible things.  Gretta asks Hobbes if he belives in God.  Hobbes says it’s hard to have faith when you deal with murder every day, a somewhat clichéd line that Washington makes work through the absolute conviction of his delivery,

Denzel Washington is the key to this film’s success.  Sure, there’s a lot of murders and a lot of twists and a lot of possessions and there’s a lot of scenes that are shot from the point of view of the demon but, in the end, Fallen works because Washington is absolutely convincing as a man who is facing an evil that is beyond human understanding.  Washington gives a very naturalistic and grounded performance, one that keeps an element of reality in Fallen regardless of how messy the story may get.  When it becomes apparent that the demon is going to try to harm his brother and his nephew, Washington’s fury feels real.  When Hobbes discovers that the demon has gotten to one of them, Washington’s underplayed reaction makes the scene even more poignant and painful.  It’s hard to imagine Fallen being anywhere near as effective with an actor other than Denzel Washington in the lead role.

Fallen is a twisty movie.  The demon moves quickly and it always seems to have a backup plan.  He manipulates Hobbes into doing some things that are so terrible that you’re not sure that Hobbes is every going to recover, even if he does somehow manage to defeat Azazel.  Hobbes and Azazel are worthy adversaries and, as a result, the film gets away with a lot of stuff that wouldn’t otherwise work.  Even the use of Time Is On My Side pays off, as the one character who you don’t want to hear sing the song suddenly starts doing a Mick Jagger impersonation and you’re just like, “Oh no, what’s going to happen now?”  The film’s high point is a lengthy sequence where Hobbes stands on a busy street and watches as Azazel jumps from body to body.  Everyone who passes Hobbe gives him a death glare.  It’s a frightening moment, one in which Fallen captures the intensity of a nightmare.

I watched Fallen earlier today.  I can’t really say that I was expecting much from it but I was surprised.  It’s actually one of the better horror films that I’ve watched for the first time this month.  It’s big and strange and creepy and it’s got Denzel Washington doing what he does best.  What more could you ask for?

The Terror Within II (1991, directed by Andrew Stevens)


Two years after ripping off Alien with The Terror Within, producer Roger Corman decided to rip it off a second time with The Terror Within II.  This time, star Andrew Stevens hopped into the director’s chair and, along with the sex-crazed monsters, a religious cult was also added.  A year after The Terror Within II was released, Alien 3 was released and it also featured a religious cult.  Was it a coincidence or was Roger Corman predicting the future?

Speaking of the future, The Terror Within II returns us to the crappy future that was predicted by the first film.  As the previous film’s only survivor, scientist Andrew Stevens is walking across Colorado to take a position at yet another lab.  Along the way, he meets a young woman named Ariel (Clare Hoak).  No sooner have they met than they’re doing their bit to repopulate the human race.  Meanwhile, a cult wants to kidnap Ariel and offer her up to the mutants.  (The mutants were called Gargoyles in the first film.  Now, they’re called Lusus.)

Meanwhile, at the other lab, the scientists, including Stella Stevens and R. Lee Ermey, are studying a mutated finger, which appears to be spontaneously regenerating into a Gargoyle or a Lusus or whatever its called now.  Does it occur to anyone at the lab that growing their own monster is a stupid idea?  No.  Humanity is doomed.

The Terror Within II was shot for even less money than the first film but it’s also a marked improvement.  That’s mostly due to Andrew Stevens being a far more competent filmmaker than the director who did the first film.  Stevens know how to shoot an action scene and, when the monsters inevitable do end up storming the lab, it’s more exciting in the second film than it was in the first.  Plus, whereas The Terror Within only had George Kennedy to lend it some class, The Terror Within II has both R. Lee Ermey and Stella Stevens!  It’s an improvement, all around.

Unfortunately, there was never a third film.  The Lusus probably would have won anyways.  There’s only so many underground labs that humanity can hide out in.

Game Review: The House on Highfield Lane (2021, Andy Joel)


The House on Highfield Lane is an entrant in 2021 Interactive Fiction competition.  Browse and experience all of the games by clicking here.

Mandy has always been frightened by the forboding house that sits on Highfield Lane but, when she’s walking home from school one day and comes across a letter that’s been addresses to the house’s owner, she decides to finally conquer her fear. What starts as a simple quest to deliver the mail turns into a long adventure as Mandy explores the house, solves puzzles, and even helps to reanimate the dead.

The author of this game described its genre as being “horror without the horror,” because, even though the game is about exploring a creepy old house, there aren’t any of the elements that usually come with a haunted house game. (There is a mad scientist but he’s not such a bad fellow.) This is actually kind of an old-fashioned game, where the emphasis is on exploring and solving puzzles. There’s a lot of puzzles. Solving puzzles has always been my weak spot when it comes to playing IF games. I’m the type of player who always ends up asking for hints or looking at a walk-through. The House on Highfield Lane does come with hints. It wasn’t long after I started playing that I started to use them but again, I’m terrible at puzzles. I think most experienced IF players will be able to solve the majority of the game’s puzzles without having to ask for help.

This is an enjoyable and engaging game. The descriptions of each room were so well-written that I could easily picture them in my head as I played, This game was partially designed to show off the new Quest 6 engine and it does a good job of doing just that. Content-wise, it feels like a throwback to the old text adventures that you would play for hours, experimenting with different verbs and seeing what you could do in each room of the house. If you like exploration-centered games and don’t mind having to figure out several puzzles, this is a game you should enjoy.

Play The House on Highfield Lane.

Scenes that I Love: Tor Johnson In The Unearthly


We continue to honor the memory of Tor Johnson with today’s scene of the day.

Even though Tor Johnson is playing a character named Lobo, today’s scene that I love isn’t from Ed Wood’s 1955 film, Bride of the Monster. Instead, it’s from 1957’s The Unearthly. In this film, Lobo is now John Carradine’s servant. (Lobo made quite a career out of working for mad scientists.) The Unearthly was directed by Boris Peftroff, a friend of Wood’s, so it’s not improbable that this film’s Lobo was meant to be the same Lobo as the one who appeared in Bride of the Monster and Night of the Ghouls.

Anyway, in this scene, Tor does his usual Lobo stuff while John Carradine plays the piano. “Time for go to bed,” Lobo says at one point, a much-mocked line but one that is delivered with a bit of gentleness by Tor Johnson. My point is that Tor did the best that he could and bless him for it.