Review: Rise of the Planet of the Apes (dir. by Rupert Wyatt)

In 2001, Tim Burton released his highly-anticipated remake of the classic 1968 film adaptation of Pierre Boulle’s sci-fi novel which would ultimately be called, Planet of the Apes. Fans of the series were excited to see what idiosyncrasies Burton would add to the series which had petered out decades before. What people were hoping for and what they ended up getting were polar opposites. The film in of itself wasn’t an awful film, but it wasn’t a good one and many saw it as average at best and bad at it’s worst. Any plans to sequelize this remake fell by the wayside. It took almost a decade until a decision was made to continue the series in a different direction.

British filmmaker and writer Rupert Wyatt would be given the task to rejuvenate for a second time the Planet of the Apes franchise. He would be working with a screenplay written by Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver which would take the 4th film in the series, Conquest of the Planet of the Apes, and rework it for a much more current setting. The film was to be called Rise of the Apes and would star James Franco, John Lithgow and Frieda Pinto. As time went by the film would be renamed Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Despite having such an awkward sounding titles the film would end up to be one of the best films of the summer of 2011, if not one of the best of the year.

The film begins with a harrowing sequence in the jungles of Central Africa as poachers capture several chimpanzees to be sold as medical test subjects. Some of these chimps end up at a genetics research lab outside of San Francisco where one Will Rodman (James Franco) is working to find a cure to Alzheimer. He sees the encouraging result in one chimp he has named “Bright Eyes” (due to the side-effect to the test subject’s eyes taking on green flecks to their irises) and pushes for the next step and that’s human testing. The ensuing pitch to the company’s board of directors doesn’t go as planned as Bright Eyes goes on a violent rampage leading to her being put down and the project shelved. Her reaction they soon find out has less to do with the breakthrough treatment and more of a maternal instinct to protect her baby she secretly gave birth to. Will takes the baby chimp home in secret temporarily, but soon becomes attached to it as does his Alzheimer stricken father (John Lithgow) who names it Caesar.

The first third of the film sees Caesar showing an inherited hyper-intelligence from his genetically-treated mother. Caesar becomes an integral part of the Rodman household even to the point that Will has taught Caesar to call him father. It’s a family dynamic which would help mold Caesar into something more than just a wild animal. He begins to show signs of humanity which would become bedrock of his decision later in the film to turn become the revolutionary that the film has been leading up to the moment Caesar gets sent to a primate sanctuary after a violent encounter with a boorish neighbor to end the first reel of the film.

It’s during the second reel which sees Caesar realize that while he may as smart (maybe even smarter) than the humans he would never be a part of that world. In the sanctuary he learns that his very uniqueness has set him apart from the other primates. He sees the abuse inflicted on his fellow primates and longing to be back to his “home” with Will turns to a focus need to free himself and his people. He does this in the only fashion he knows would succeed. With the help from a couple canisters containing the aerosol-based treatment which increased his mother’s intelligence, Caesar frees everyone from the sanctuary and takes the fight to the humans as they make for the wilds of the Muir Redwood Forest north of San Francisco.

Rise of the Planet of the Apes might look to be an action-packed film from how the trailers and tv spots has been pushing the film, but it actually only has three major action sequences and they’re integral to each third of the film in helping advance the story. These were not action for the sake of having action on the screen. Writers Jaffa and Silver do a great job in figuring out that the real strength of the film would be Caesar’s journey from precocious ape child, rebellious teen and then his final unveiling as the leader of a people who have shaken off the shackles of medical research and their forced sacrifice for the greater good.

The film was never about the humans played by Franco, Pinto and Lithgow. It was always about Caesar and the film hinged on the audience believing Caesar as a character. In that regard, the work by WETA Digital should be commended as should Andy Serkis’ performance as Caesar. Serkis’ motion capture performance goes beyond just mimicking the movement of an ape. His own acting as Caesar comes through in even in the digital form of Caesar. In fact, the film never had a real ape used during filming. From Caesar right up to the scarred ape Koba every ape in the film was the work of WETA Digital’s furthering the motion capture work they had done in Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy and James Cameron’s Avatar. Never once during the two hour running time of the film did I ever not believe I was watching apes on the screen. Every emotion Caesar goes through during the film was able to show through facial expressions and body language.

It’s the strength of Serkis’ mo-cap work and the overall execution of Caesar’s character by WETA which also highlighted the one major weakness of the film through it’s underdeveloped human characters. Whether it was Franco’s benevolent Dr. Frankenstein-like Will Rodman right up to his greedy, amoral boss in the company (played by David Oyelowo), all the human’s in the film were very one-note and mostly served to propel Caesar’s story forward. At times, Franco actually seemed to be just as he was during his hosting gig during the Academy Awards earlier in the year. These were not bad performances by the actors involved. They were just there and part of it was due to how underwritten their characters were.

To help balance out this flaw in the film’s non-ape character would be the beautiful work by the film’s cinematographer in Andrew Lesnie. He has always been well-known for beautiful, majestic panoramic shot of the world as he had demonstrated in Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. He does the same for this film as we see some beautiful shots of the Muir Redwood forest, of San Francisco’s skyline and in the climactic battle on the Golden Gate Bridge. The city of San Francisco and it’s iconic red-hued bridge and the surrounding area has never been shot as gorgeous as Lesnie has done with his DP work on this film.

Even with some of the characters in the film being underwritten the film succeeds through Rupert Wyatt’s direction which keeps the film moving efficiently, but also bringing out the emotional content of the film’s script in an organic way. Film has always been about manipulating the audience’s  emotions. It’s when a director does so and make it seem normal is when such manipulation doesn’t come through for those watching to feel. Then add to this Serkis’ exceptional work as Caesar with some major digital artistry from the folks over at WETA Digital and Rise of the Planet of the Apes does rise above it’s B-movie foundation into something that should live beyond the summer and for years to come.

Rise of the Planet of the Apes does a great job and a long way towards wiping off the bad taste left behind by Tim Burton’s failed attempt to remake the franchise. We didn’t need something exotic and idiosyncratic to give the franchise a fresh breath of life. It seems all it needed was a very good story, some exceptional work from Andy Serkis and WETA Digital and a filmmaker knowing how to tell the story in a natural fashion and not fall into the temptation to go into shock and awe to tell it. Rise of the Planet of the Apes is a film that could stand-alone, but it does something that many trying to create film franchises never seem to do right: it makes people want to see what happens next in the lives of Caesar and his apes.

7 responses to “Review: Rise of the Planet of the Apes (dir. by Rupert Wyatt)

  1. I agree with 99.9% of this review. Rise of the Planet of the Apes is one of the best films of the year and hopefully, Andy Serkis will be remembered around awards time.

    The one point that I would disagree with you on is (surprise, surprise) James Franco’s performace. I thought Franco gave an excellent performance that, unfortunately, kinda got lost in all the excitement generated by Andy Serkis and the apes. However, if the film had just been James Franco and John Lithgow trying to deal with Lithgow’ descent into senility, I would have still wanted to see it and I would probably have spent the whole movie in tears. Seriously, Franco and Lithgow noth gave excellent performances even though, technically, they could have gotten away with just going through the motions. After all, everyone in the theater was there to see the Apes.

    All hail Caesar but all hail James Franco as well!

    As a sidenote, this has actually been a pretty good summer, hasn’t it? Seriously, it’s been one unexpectedly good film after another, from the Marvel films to comedies like Horrible Bosses to the final Harry Potter film and finally, to the Rise of the Planet of the Apes. It’s been such a good summer that you can almost forget about the Green Lantern. 🙂


    • I had an inkling that you would disagree with me on Franco’s performance. 🙂

      Yeah, it has been a very good summer film season. The film’s people weren’t expecting to be the best of the crop actually ended up being the surprise hits and very good: X-Men – First Class, Captain America and now Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Even Super 8 wasn’t being touted as one of the big hits, but that one surprised everyone.

      I think what all these films had going for it in the end were very good stories, capable directors and, in the end, exceptional performances.


  2. So, they don’t nuke the redwood forest to kill off the apes in the end? That’s how I’d have written it. Besides, the redwoods need to be nuked anyways, never can tell what they’re thinking. Anyways, looks like I have something to look forward to when I get off the boat next week, so that’s good.


  3. Totally agreed on this. Unless I see something different later this year, this has the Visual Effects nominations pretty locked at least. What I liked the most about this was the sense of emotion. This one had so much feeling, compared to the other films. Some of the moments in Caesar’s cell were easily tear inducing.

    I didn’t have any problem with Franco’s performance at all, really. I did, however have a problem with Freida Pinto’s character. She was kind of a vet, but her character didn’t really bring anything to the table really for me. I don’t know, maybe I was looking for more of a Anne Heche / Tommy Lee Jones kind of team up in Volcano (she knows how lava works, he knows how to plan to avoid disasters). Still, that’s something very little in an otherwise wonderful film. 🙂


    • Freida Pinto was just kinda there and if you really think about it, she was kind of a villian in this story. I mean, everytime Franco took her advice, something terrible happened. It would have made far more sense (SPOILER ALERT) to kick her off the bridge as opposed to the cartoonish corporate villian guy. (Spoiler Alert Ended)

      As much as I loved this film, I still think Conquest of the Planet of the Apes was superior and I’ll tell you why: (HUGE SPOILER ALERT, DON’T READ THIS IF YOU HAVEN’T SEEN THE FILM AND THEN COME BACK HERE BITCHING AND WHINING ABOUT IT BECAUSE I GAVE YOU FAIR WARNING, YOU DUMBFUG TOADSUCKER): In Conquest, the Apes were actually leading a revolution and trying to kill every human they saw whereas in this one, the apes are just trying to escape and really, the death of humanity is pretty much the fault of my future husband James Franco. Therefore, Conquest is a far more subversive film because it supported a violent overthrow of humanity and Caesar and the Apes were pretty much willing to kill every human they saw — even Don Murray, for God’s sake! Whereas in this one, they were just benevolent and wanted to be left alone. Conquest’s Caesar was like Che Guevara whereas Rise’s Caesar was more like Allende. And don’t get me wrong — I’m not a fan of either one of those two commies but just from a film point of view, it makes Conquest a more interesting film to consider than Rise. (SPOILER ALERT DONE, GET OVER YOURSELF)


  4. Pingback: Never Nominated: 16 Actors Who Have Never Been Nominated For An Oscar | Through the Shattered Lens

  5. Pingback: Icarus File No. 4: Captive State (dir by Rupert Wyatt) | Through the Shattered Lens

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.