Lisa Marie Bowman Does Michael Clayton (dir. by Tony Gilroy)


As part of my continuing mission to see and review every single film ever nominated for best picture, I recently rewatched the 2007 Best Picture nominee Michael Clayton

The title character (as played by George Clooney) is a sleazy attorney who “fixes” problems for one of the biggest law firms in New York.  When Arthur Edens (Tom Wilkinson), one of the firm’s partners and Michael’s mentor, has a nervous breakdown while at a deposition in Minnesota and ends up in jail, Michael is sent to retrieve him.  Michael soon discovers that Arthur’s mental collapse was due to a class action law suit involving an evil, faceless corporation.  Before he reveals any more details, Arthur flees and is subsequently murdered by two assassins.  With the police calling Arthur’s death a suicide, Michael soon finds himself being pursued by the same assassins.

Though I’ve owned the DVD for a couple of years, this was only the second time that I had ever actually sat down and watched this film.  (The first time was during its initial theatrical run.)  There have been many insomnia-filled nights when I’ve gone to my DVD collection, fully intending on grabbing Michael Clayton and allowing the images of an unshaven George Clooney to flicker in my dark bedroom.  However, every time, I always ended up suddenly remembering a film that I wanted to see more. 

That’s the thing with Michael Clayton.  Having seen the film a second time, I can say that it remains a well-made film and an entertaining film and I can also say that I noticed a whole lot of small details that I had either missed the first time or had subsequently forgotten about.  Like a lot of best picture nominees, Michael Clayton is a good film.  It’s just not a very memorable one.  Seriously, is anyone surprised when business executives and attorneys turn out to be the villains in these type of films?  And if you couldn’t guess that Tom Wilkinson was going to end up dead from the minute he turned up on-screen then you may need to surrender your filmgoer card.

That said, Michael Clayton remains a fun little film and I enjoyed watching it even if it was predictable.  In fact, I may have enjoyed it even more the second time around because I currently work for an attorney so I was able to spend the whole movie playing the “What would my boss do in this situation?” game.  (Hopefully, the first thing he would do would be to send his loyal and capable red-headed assistant on a nice, long, all-expense paid vacation Italy.)  Beyond that, Tony Gilroy’s direction is efficient and fast-paced, George Clooney gives one of his less-smug performances (It can be argued that Michael Clayton — along with Up In The Air and The Descendants — forms Clooney’s Mediocre White Man Trilogy) and Tilda Swinton deserved the Oscar she won for playing a villain who isn’t so much evil as just really insecure.   However, for me, the best performances in this film come from two unheralded actors by the name of Robert Prescott and Terry Serpico.  Playing the two assassins who pursue both Wilkinson and Clooney, Serpico and Prescott play their roles with a nonchalant sort of respectability that is both compelling and genuinely frightening.  During those brief moments when Serpico and Prescott are on-screen, Michael Clayton actually becomes the film that it is obviously trying so hard to be.

2 responses to “Lisa Marie Bowman Does Michael Clayton (dir. by Tony Gilroy)

  1. I actually liked this one far more than I thought I would. Like you, I get tired of Clooney’s oh-so-earnest politically preachy projects (even if I generally agree with his left-leaning views and like the fact that a Hollywood “A-lister” has enough conviction to push through projects that appeal to his consicence and not just his wallet), but in this one the politics, though obvious, take a back seat to just plain good storytelling, and while elements of it certainly are predictable — like you say, it’s obvious Wilkinson is toast from the outset — Gilroy does a nice job of humanizing his “villain” characters, particularly Swinton’s CEO (thanks, of course, in no small part to her tremendous portrayal), who could easily have been portrayed as a two-dimensional cardboard cut-out corporate monster (in fact, this film’s target audience would have cheered at that). I dunno, maybe it’s just because I watched the laughably absurd “Atlas Shrugged, Part 1” over the weekend, where characters took extended breaks from their already-insipid dialogue to deliver even-more-insipid socio-political harangues for no reason other than to proselytize their dull “greed is good” viewpoints (that, for some reason, the filmmakers thought were soooooo important and revolutionary — sorry, a movie that ultimately says “the ultra-rich — including, by the way, the Hollywood executives who bankrolled this film — shouldn’t have to pay any taxes and should be free to order everyone else around at will” is hardly “sticking it to the man” or whatever), but a movie with a political message — any political message — that is content to spread that message through its story rather than hammering it into our heads is worthy of some respect, in my opinion, and I wish Clooney would have employed that sort of thinking with “The Ides Of March,” rather than going for the heavy-handed approach that does nothing but alienate anybody with an ounce of appreciation for good storytelling.

    Like

  2. Pingback: Embracing the Melodrama Part II #110: Atonement (dir by Joe Wright) | Through the Shattered Lens

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.