Val’s Movie Roundup #12: Hallmark Edition


finding-a-family.7565

Finding A Family (2011) – This movie is about a kid named Alex (Jared Abrahamson) whose mother has serious mental problems. She has a great degree, but her mental problems absolutely cripple her. As you can guess, they create major issues for her son who has to live with her day after day. Ultimately, Alex has himself emancipated. He wants to go to Harvard and works hard in school to make this work while not forgetting his mother. Then he decides that he really does want a family and starts writing to people asking them to take him in. It’s a nice story that really only had one issue and a minor personal complaint.

The issue is that I have some experience in this area and the depth to which his mother’s mental problems should affect him, don’t. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not like The Blind Side (2009) where they gutted and flattened two amazing people, but it’s noticeable. The other thing is a minor complaint. In the old days you did receive a letter from colleges you applied to telling you whether you were accepted or not. However, I applied in 2006 and we was never sent a letter. You checked their website to find out whether you were accepted or not. This film was made in 2011. I know it’s more dramatic and familiar to go with the letter thing, but it’s time to move on.

You’ve seen it all before, but if you want to see again, then check this one out.

banner_gengap

Generation Gap (2008) – There really isn’t much to talk about here. You’ve seen this plot a million times before. We meet Dylan (Alex Black) who is just too much for his mother because of a few scenes of rebellion. His Mom, played by Catherine Mary Stewart, calls up her father played by Ed Asner and dumps Dylan on him. After a few scenes of Asner acting like a dick, which he seems to think he is entitled to do because he’s old, both him and the kid calm down. The film does three things: 1. Asner and the kid come to realize that despite being different ages, they both occupy the same time and place on Earth, 2. Asner hooks up with Rue McClanahan who sounds weird without her Southern accent, 3. The kid also gains a romantic interest.

The only other noteworthy things are that they age Asner by about 10 years to have his character able to have been in WWII. The other is that the kid walks in on Asner and three other guys playing Halo. Pretty funny. Remember that scene in The Wizard (1989) where Beau Bridges is supposedly playing Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, but we now know thanks to AVGN that he was probably playing Winter Games for the NES? Well, they actually show that Halo is what is being played and I wouldn’t be surprised if Asner and the others were actually playing.

This one is cliched, but okay.

MV5BMTgyODAzNjUzOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDY3MzgxMw@@._V1_SY317_CR3,0,214,317_AL_

Expecting A Miracle (2009) – This is a weird movie. It seems to be nice and have it’s heart in the right place, but there are some odd bits. It introduces us to a couple played by Jason Priestley and Teri Polo who have been trying to get pregnant. It seems that the couple has tried IVF several times, but there doesn’t seem to be any mention of sex whatsoever. Did they try that?

To try and calm down, they take a vacation and wind up in a small Mexican town that seems to consist only of a courtyard. Cheech Marin is here along with some other characters who conveniently speak English. There is a kid who has something wrong with his leg and is convinced that a special ceremony is going to fix it. This is the kind of place populated with people who are like the magic negro/eccentric characters that turn your life around simply by coming into contact with them.

Polo is told a line that basically says God decides whether you will have kids or not. Okay, but does that mean God also controls the adoption process which is brought up numerous times during this film. Maybe it’s the film’s way of saying that God sometimes is trying to tell you that it’s not necessary to pass on your genetic material, but instead to save a poor kid who needs a family and people who will love them.

The rest is harmless and kind of nice, but then comes the ending. The kid in the village is miraculously cured of a condition with his leg during a ceremony. The couple talk about adopting him. At the very end, they are at home working through the adoption process, talking about how much paperwork there is to adopt a kid. The wife goes to the bathroom and takes a pregnancy test. She’s pregnant! Then there are the credits. Did they have sex? Was it IVF again? Did they still follow through and adopt the kid? No answers.

It’s nice and everything, but I can’t honestly recommend it. Just a little too weird and relies on people’s assumptions about the nobility and happiness about simple rural communities.

Murder101_IfWishesWereHorses_0001.jpg

Murder 101: If Wishes Were Horses (2007) – Another Hallmark murder mystery, but just like Murder 101, this was good. As always, I’m terrible about following the plots of these movies. It all begins when a horse is kidnapped. Once again, Dick Van Dyke is brought in to help with the case. Barry Van Dyke is back again as well, but this time Shane Van Dyke joins in on the fun. This is your standard murder mystery movie in the vein of Diagnosis Murder, Murder, She Wrote, and Mystery Woman as opposed to recent movies like Wedding Planner Mystery and Garage Sale Mystery. This one’s fine.

4 Shots From 4 Films: My Apprenticeship, The Wayward Cloud, The Birds, The Bees and the Italians, Sky Murder


Humor.

My Apprenticeship (1939, dir. Mark Donskoy)

My Apprenticeship (1939, dir. Mark Donskoy)

The Wayward Cloud (2005, dir. Tsai Ming-Liang)

The Wayward Cloud (2005, dir. Tsai Ming-Liang)

The Birds, The Bees and the Italians (1966, dir. Pietro Germi)

The Birds, The Bees and the Italians (1966, dir. Pietro Germi)

Sky Murder (1940, dir. George B. Seitz)

Sky Murder (1940, dir. George B. Seitz)

Val’s Movie Roundup #11: Hallmark Edition


123069-mystery-woman-in-the-shadows-0-230-0-345-crop

Mystery Woman: In The Shadows (2007) – Once again, we join Kellie Martin and Clarence Williams III at the Mystery Woman Bookstore. This time the two are at a book signing when the author announces that his next book will name a KGB agent. I think this is the best of the three Mystery Woman movies I’ve seen so far (Oh Baby, Redemption, and In The Shadows). I like that fact that it involves international intrigue instead of just some local person murdered in Centerville, USA where a busybody takes it upon themselves to investigate. I also love that most of the movie Kellie Martin is in the hospital and out of commission. As much as I like her, it was really nice to see Williams shine. He knows about this secret world and it’s fun to watch him navigate it. I know there are other Mystery Woman films, but of the ones I have watched, this is the one I recommend most strongly.

MV5BMTcyMzM3NDEwM15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNzc4MTc4MTE@._V1_SY317_CR12,0,214,317_AL_

Garage Sale Mystery (2013) – This, on the other hand, is the typical Hallmark mystery fare these days. It’s not good. This one follows Lori Loughlin who runs a consignment store and hits garage sales for items to resell. When a friend is found dead and it might tie in with garage sales, then this woman who can’t mind her own business begins investigating. There is a cop on the case, but he seems pretty incompetent and worthless to the film. Loughlin just seems to sleepwalk through the whole thing. There just isn’t anything here worth watching. It’s better than some of these mystery movies on Hallmark, but that’s not saying a whole lot. I really wonder who thought it was a good idea to remove all edge, suspense, feeling, and reality from murder mysteries, then decided to make tons of them. At least there is a scene where her son has her play Minecraft to clear her mind. That was interesting even if we never actually see the game or her really play it.

GarageSaleMystery-Glitters-Poster

Garage Sale Mystery: All That Glitters (2014) – I guess since it wasn’t a total mound of caca doo doo, they thought it was ready for a full series. It still sucks. Again, one of her friends ends up dead. I guess being friends with Lori Loughlin’s character means you’re marked for death. At least Jessica Fletcher brought death to the places she visited. Loughlin’s just thinning out the population of her own town. This time the person killed is tied to a storage facility she won in an auction. Of course there are rare items and in short order a guy shows up wearing a sign that says I’m the bad guy. Luckily, he’s played by Kavan Smith of Eureka. He was a welcome sight even if by being well known it meant he was the bad guy. I’m not giving anything away here. It’s really really really obvious. Plus, I’m leaving the details out. At least this time people tell her she should mind her own business. She ignores it, but it’s nice to hear some voices of reason. Skip this one too. I wonder if the other two Garage Sale Mystery movies are any better. I doubt it.

ka_ka_Murder101College

Murder 101 (2006) – This is how you do a murder mystery! Someone is murdered, so a cop brings a criminology professor in to help solve the case. Simple! The non-police officer actually has a reason to be there investigating. And the criminals aren’t a joke. Also, this isn’t some weird Stepford Wives world where everything exists in fantasy. It even has Dick Van Dyke and his son Barry who, by the way, looks like Michael Bay in this. It’s kind of funny. A business executive is killed in an explosion. Barry brings Dick into the investigation and an investigative reporter comes along since she was there. It’s nothing amazing, but far better than movies like Garage Sale Mystery, Murder, She Baked, Wedding Planner Mystery, Aurora Teagarden, etc. I wish Hallmark would go back to doing mystery movies like this and Mystery Woman again. They are so much more enjoyable and far better made in general.

Val’s Movie Roundup #10: Hallmark Edition


My memory may be a little fuzzy on these since they are all murder mystery movies. Also, some other stuff like getting Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Fester’s Quest for the NES working interjected themselves between viewings. Don’t judge me! I had them as a kid and they need to be beaten. Luckily, because of the kind of movies these are, I don’t think it will be a problem.

mystery-woman-oh-baby

Mystery Woman: Oh Baby (2006) – I hadn’t seen Kellie Martin since she was on floor dead in her final episode of ER. I really enjoyed her on that show. This movie pairs her with Clarence Williams III who people probably remember best from The Mob Squad, but I remember him from The General’s Daughter (1999). Martin runs a book shop she took over from her uncle called Mystery Woman Books. The movie begins with a guy getting murdered on a golf course by the partner they were playing with. A woman then shows up at the bookstore with a baby. She knew Martin’s uncle so Martin opens up her home to her and her baby. Soon the mother disappears to join the husband who is on the run. The husband is a groundskeeper who witnessed the murder, but instead of reporting it, ran away. Thus, the police are after him as a suspect. Martin and Williams gear up to try solve the crime. This is the best murder mystery series I have seen so far on Hallmark. Martin and Williams are likable. They don’t come across as busy bodies. You can follow the mystery. You actually care to follow the mystery. And it isn’t sanitized to the point of looking like the Stepford Wives. This one is worth checking out.

imgres

The Gourmet Detective (2015) – This is the film that introduces us to the Brooke Burns’ cop who still identifies herself as a detective even though SFPD officers of her type are called inspectors. It also introduces us to Dylan Neal, know as The Gourmet Detective. The setup for him and getting them together is pretty stupid. I can’t believe Neal kept a straight face while explaining that he is called The Gourmet Detective because if a key ingredient runs out, then someone like him hunts down a replacement. The setup BS is just annoying. The rest of the mystery is done well enough. Apparently, just like the second film, a journalist dies. The only really noteworthy thing is that they bother to stop and give us a real recap of what has been figured out so far. I don’t think any of the other ones I’ve watched have done it, or at least in a useful manner. This is really nice. Especially for someone like myself who has difficulty following along. Okay to see, but the second one is better because it doesn’t have all that setup stuff.

Murder_She_Baked_key

Murder, She Baked: A Chocolate Chip Cookie Mystery (2015) – Think that title is long enough? Why not The Incredibly Sensibly Dressed Baker Who Stopped Making Cookies And Became An Amateur Detective. Maybe that will inspire Hallmark’s next series. This is one of those films that people seem to refer to as a cozy mystery. I guess cozy means sanitized and set in nice areas to the point that the Stepford Wives are soon to arrive and the town is going change it’s name to Pleasantville any day now. The movie is about a baker played by Alison Sweeney. After a friend and a delivery driver get killed, she investigates. A cop played by Cameron Mathison comes into things. He’s really just there to add a romantic interest in much the same way they did in Wedding Planner Mystery. It’s neat that Sweeney actually cries over the loss of her friends. In the others it’s like it’s just an excuse to investigate or they don’t seem to care. I remember a scene in Lies Between Friends where Gabrielle Anwar just stared from a distance at the dead body of her friend like she caught her doing something dirty. I would recommend any of the other three films listed here over this one. It’s so sanitized that things like suspense simply don’t exist.

MysteryWoman_Redemption_0016.jpg

Mystery Woman: Redemption (2006) – Again, we return to the bookstore with Martin and Williams. This time John Ratzenberger plays a Vietnam vet who shows up in the bookstore and soon after is found murdered. The investigation ultimately leads back to something that he and others went through during the Vietnam war. They found something special that they were planning to return to the government later on, but never did. All the good things about Mystery Woman: Oh Baby are present here. In addition, they don’t have to keep a baby in tow. Plus, the story is more interesting. The two Mystery Woman movies are definitely the ones to go with here. I have one more of these films to go and will write about it once I have seen it.

Val’s Movie Roundup #9: Hallmark Edition


WHACK! You just got hit in the head with a greeting card.

515PtDMPqiL

Bound By A Secret (2009) – This is a good one. It’s very refreshing to come across a Hallmark movie like this. It’s about an actress (Lesley Ann Warren) who quits her career and goes to visit her friend played by Meredith Baxter from Family Ties. I really want to find a movie where she plays a villain. I mean we have Michael Gross as a gun nut in the Tremors movies. I think she has the acting chops to pull it off. But getting back to this movie, there are four issues being faced by the characters. The actress is dying and Baxter’s daughter is actually hers biologically. Baxter is overprotective of her daughter and life in general. Amazingly for a Hallmark movie, they even use the way she treats her china as a metaphor for the way she treats her family. A nice touch that I didn’t expect in a TV Movie. The daughter’s problem is that her husband is out of work and is kind of proud. Think, kind of like the husband in The Crowd (1928), just not as extreme. It’s not tearing the family apart in the same way, but he doesn’t appreciate Baxter helping out. Things move forward, the secret comes out, and it works it’s way to the happy ending. The acting is solid and the script is good. It’s a well made film. This is a Hallmark movie that I can get behind.

2015-08-05_ea1f164588c59b70ebac361479a151b5

Gourmet Detective: A Healthy Place to Die (2015) – This is another one I liked as much as Bound By A Secret. Yeah, I’m a little biased because I already like Brooke Burns. I enjoy watching her host The Chase. I think she does a good job. I think this is the first of these mystery movies they make for Hallmark that basically did it right. The other ones I’ve seen have issues that make it difficult to follow the story, or to even care. That’s that not present here. It’s just my issue with mysteries in general. I’m a simple person and these plots tend to be too much for me. It starts with a short setup, which I like. It’s almost like they were making a subtle jab at the excuses given in movies for why two people need to go off together. They don’t even try. Dylan Neal shows up at the police station. He mentions he’s going to a resort to give a talk on cooking. The chief basically then just tells Burns you don’t take vacation days, that’s pissing people off, so you’re going. End of story. That happens inside of a couple minutes. During a dinner scene at the resort we meet a reporter who isn’t well liked. Anyone who grew up watching Murder, She Wrote knows that means she’s marked for death. The rest is pretty standard stuff of leading us around till we finally settle on suspects they hope aren’t out of left field, but not incredibly obvious. I think the chemistry between Burns and Neal works. I also like that because of the way Burns is built and carries herself, we really do feel like we’re just watching two people working together. Rather than we’re watching a guy and girl work together. It’s a small thing, but it was just more reason for me to like this movie. I want to see the other one of these they did together.

MyGalSunday-DVD-F

My Gal Sunday (2014) – This one on the other hand, my recommendation is to pretend this doesn’t exist. And run far away from anyone who tries to get you to watch it. Honestly, I’m up to 27 Hallmark movies now and this is easily the worst I’ve seen. They might as well have called this The Mystery Cruise II because it has all the same problems as that film and more. It’s also based on a book by the same author. It has the same abrupt beginning. I really think what happened here is that someone picked up the book, didn’t actually read it, but skimmed it looking for key scenes, jotted them down, then wrote the screenplay. I can’t imagine much thought went into the adaptation. Abrupt beginnings are common in books. It works just fine in that medium. It doesn’t work in movies. It especially doesn’t work in TV Movies. An abrupt beginning like this one, which is cringe worthy for other reasons, makes you think you have come back from a commercial in the middle of a show. You could easily think you must have missed something, but no. The movie actually just started. Then it only gets worse. Things just jump around for lack of a better description so you have little chance of really following things or caring to follow things. There are flashbacks that are confusing. The director tries to add a little bit of an artsy transition into them, but it just makes things worse. And there’s no chemistry whatsoever. Sometimes the camera lingers on Rachel Blanchard’s face and what? Is she emoting? Did they forget to say cut? It’s stupid. If you manage to suffer through this whole thing then you are treated to one of the dumbest resolutions ever. If you get there, then you’ll know exactly what I am talking about, but please don’t. Spare yourself this abomination.

WeddingPlannerMysteryHMM

Wedding Planner Mystery (2014) – Jeez! What’s next Nail Technician Mystery or Retro Video Game Salesperson Mystery. Time is money. Don’t think of a title, just throw something onto the word “Murder” or “Mystery”. This is not My Gal Sunday. It’s not good, but it’s a far cry from that movie. It’s also a far cry from Gourmet Detective: A Healthy Place to Die. It’s about a wedding planner and there’s a mystery. Go figure! The wedding planner is played by Erica Durance of Smallville fame. I don’t think I’ve ever complained about the makeup in a movie, but here I go. Durance looks like a plastic doll. I thought maybe surgery, but I think it was just bad makeup cause a couple other of the young actresses also didn’t look good in the same way. Even the guys seemed to be wearing too much makeup. Also, one of the older ladies was wearing a lousy wig. Not like the Lies Between Friends wig, but it’s not good. The movie begins at a wedding and a bridesmaid dies in a car accident. Honestly, I can’t really tell you why Durance investigates. I guess it had something to do with alcohol being served at the wedding, but it just seems like she can’t mind her own damn business. What follows is just boring. In some ways, it’s more like an attempt at a romantic comedy between Durance and some paparazzi-ish reporter. None of it really works. Especially not the voice overs from Durance like she’s suddenly Sam Spade or something. She’s a wedding planner! I can’t recommend this one, but it’s not awful. I just can’t say that you will enjoy it.

Val’s Movie Roundup #8: Hallmark Edition


220px-MagicofOrdinaryDays

The Magic of Ordinary Days (2005) – Okay, pro tip for watching Hallmark movies. Do not watch Hallmark Hall of Fame movies on Hallmark. These were specially made TV Movies that had higher production values and unusual runtimes for TV Movies. Unfortunately, Hallmark is editing them down to make them shorter. I didn’t realize that when I watched this so it was probably not the ideal viewing experience. I did notice it when I tried to watch Follow The Stars Home (2001). If that thing wasn’t edited, then it’s one of the worst put together films I’ve attempted to watch in a while. I stopped pretty quickly. I’m going to get it on DVD so I’ll find out for sure. As for this movie, the version I watched on Hallmark gets sidetracked too much with a plot involving Japanese internment camps. It should have remained focused on the couple played by Keri Russell and Skeet Ulrich. I have a feeling that problem doesn’t disappear with a greater running time. Keri Russell plays a woman pregnant out of wedlock who is married off to Ulrich that lives in the country. It takes place in the 1940’s. It’s decent. The higher production values shine through. This is not a standard Hallmark TV movie. It’s kind of night and day in that sense. The only other problem I noticed was that Russell has a little too much of a modern look, but far from Tom Cruise in The Last Samurai (2003). Ulrich blends in pretty well except at one point. Late in the film they put him in a plaid shirt and suddenly there’s 90’s Skeet Ulrich. See this one uncut.

LiesBetweenFriends_gabrielleanwar_thumb

Lies Between Friends (2010) – I’m going to cut the crap here. You see that thing in the picture above. That awful looking wig on Gabrielle Anwar’s head will drive you mad! It is terribly artificial looking. And it’s onscreen almost the entire film. What were they thinking!!! It is so distracting that you just can’t pay attention. And this is a murder mystery mind you. Just wow! Also, I found Gabrielle Anwar’s performance to have as much depth as a puddle. But it’s the wig that single-handedly ruins the movie. You’d think someone would have noticed. Even if Anwar had a bald head, then it would have been better to write that into the character rather than having that phenomenon of fakery on display. For masochists only.

565c7d693fbe88bd5f0cd4654630ec9f

Class (2010) – The plot and characters are extremely predictable. You know exactly what is going to happen from the get go. Nothing is surprising in the slightest. This movie is about a guy who is assigned by a professor at law school to help a young single mother who is having trouble. Do I have to say more? Of course not. The real problem is the casting. Not Catherine Mary Stewart. I could watch her sit in a chair reading and would be happy. Okay, I have a crush on her still after all these years. The leading actors are the problem. She looks like the Tiffani-Amber Thiessen from Beverly Hills, 90210 type, which doesn’t fit her character. He also looks like he could have been on that show. He would have played the frat boy that even Ian Ziering’s character would have found contemptible. Again, doesn’t fit his character. Neither acts well enough to pull off not instantly looking the part. It just doesn’t work.

Mystery_Cruise_revised_final_300x445

The Mystery Cruise (2013) – Over the weekend I played through River City Ransom on NES with a friend. It’s basically an RPG version of Double Dragon. If you double tap left or right, then you’ll run in that direction. When your attack gets greater, then you can come to a new screen, run, and in an instant put an enemy to the ground. The start of this movie is like being on the receiving end of that punch. Honestly, it’s like you came back from commercial in the middle of a TV show except it’s the beginning of the movie. Talk about cut to the chase. In fact, it does start at the end of a chase. Sadly, this is the best part of the movie. It’s zany and stupid. Then the movie spells out that it’s supposed to start a new TV series. Then it shows exactly why that never panned out. This is an example of messy writing and editing. You jump around from conversation to conversation, but it’s like the glue and the transitions are missing. It’s about two ladies, one of which wants to start a detective agency with the other, who go on a mystery cruise. Everyone plays a part and someone has to figure out who the murderer is. Of course reality comes in the form of a lady who is really trying to kill her husband. If you must watch something that has “The Mystery Cruise” in it, then you’re better off watching a Let’s Play of Detective Barbie: The Mystery Cruise. Out of these four movies, definitely go with The Magic of Ordinary Days, but an unedited version.

Val’s Movie Roundup #7: Hallmark Edition


Sorry, but there’s going to be a few of these in a row because I have a backlog of Hallmark movies on my DVR that really need to be cleared out. In other words, prepare for death by a thousand greeting cards.

Three_Weeks_Three_Kids_TV-630909640-large

Three Weeks, Three Kids (2011) – Anyone my age remembers Anna Chlumsky from My Girl (1991). It’s nice to see her as an adult. This movie introduces us to Chlumsky’s character Jennifer who we are supposed to believe is a wee bit irresponsible, or at least hasn’t really grown up. Well, no fear because her sister is going to go on vacation and needs a babysitter quickly for her three kids. Of course the experience is going to give her a kick in the butt. It also gets her off the boyfriend that isn’t right for her and moves her onto the one that is. Oh, lord! This is a Hallmark movie. I know there was incest in For Better Or For Worse, but I didn’t intend that pun. Well, the movie isn’t all about her. Her sister just can’t relax on the vacation and the movie is about getting her to calm down and enjoy her life and marriage more too. There is a little corny twist at the end, but I’ll leave that for those who want to see this. The movie is decent.

images

Your Love Never Fails (2011) – However, I can’t say they same for this one. This is just propaganda. Honestly, the pastor in this says almost word for word a speech given in a very blatant piece of propaganda called Every Young Woman’s Battle. When you boil off the attempt to couch it, the movie is about a woman who has a successful job in the city, but is dragged back to rural Texas by her husband and is legally coerced into spending time with him. The pastor gives a speech that says that no relationship is perfect, but that’s human nature. Just let God into your heart and that will fix the issue. Yeah, in other words, once you’re married, if the relationship isn’t working, then that just means you’re not a good Christian. He even talks to her and says she clearly still has feelings for him because she is choosing to stay even though we know she is required to stay because the court said so. There is no reason to watch this. It’s no wonder that Hallmark aired this last month under the title of A Valentine’s Date rather than the original title that is still displayed onscreen. If I want propaganda of this sort then I will watch Deception Of A Generation thank you very much. At least that’s hilarious rather than uncomfortable. They say Smurfs are homosexual zombies in that video.

140819.jpg_image_scaler_0x600

Kiss At Pine Lake (2012) – This one is much better. The only issue I picked up is a minor one. Mia Kirshner has put on a little weight. It’s only noticeable because she used to be particularly petite. This works to her advantage because it helps to make her character more believable as having aged from the younger version of herself in the movie. Also, the girl who plays her younger self bears a resemble to Kirshner. Barry Watson on the other hand doesn’t seem to change. I swear, he looks the same as he did in the first episode of 7th Heaven. It also doesn’t help that we are familiar with the way he looked on that show. On top of that, the guy who plays him as a kid doesn’t look like him at all. Luckily, the flashback scenes are short and there are very few of them so it doesn’t really harm the movie at all. As for the story, it’s about a boy and girl who liked each other at summer camp as kids, but never followed through. Their lives bring them back around to each other at the same camp many years later, but this time things work. Nice and simple. Of the four here, this is the one to watch.

Real-Murders

Real Murders: An Aurora Teagarden Mystery (2015) – TV Movies should not have complex plots. Commercials ruin them. I wish I could describe the plot to you, but I quickly lost track of the investigation. Didn’t help that it seems to move at a breakneck pace. It actually starts off feeling like it’s going to parody these types of murder mysteries. The murder is committed, but even the person being killed doesn’t seem to care. Then the characters act in humorous ways once the murder is discovered. Teagarden (Candace Cameron Bure) dives in and moves very fast. She also talks about historical murders like you’re talking to Quentin Tarantino about movies. Quick and with a great deal of knowledge. If you are able to follow the plot better than I did, maybe catch it without commercials, then you will probably enjoy it more. Still, I just can’t recommend this one at this point. I wonder if the other Aurora Teagarden movie is better.

Film Review: Law Enforcement Guide to Satanic Cults (1994, dir. Devin DeHaven)


Title Screen

Well, I mentioned it when I reviewed Show Off! How To Be Cool At Parties (1986) so here it is. The so-called Law Enforcement Guide to Satanic Cults. It’s a Satanic paranoia film. It’s just surprisingly late. I’ve seen Brad Jones (The Cinema Snob) tear into Deception of a Generation and Lisa already reviewed Rock: It’s Your Decision (1982), but that was the 80’s when even Roger Ebert jumped on that band wagon a bit. This was 1994. I only really remember the drug paranoia. Honestly, they called us into the gym in middle school to tell all the students that the only people who needed cell phones and beepers were drug dealers. No joke. The only exception were kids who needed reminders to come to the office and take their meds. Of course, this was also when people weren’t allowed to even have something like Advil on their person. I wonder if that policy still exists in schools. This assembly took place around 1996. Pretty amazing. I also remember later the Internet child predator paranoia. But Satanist paranoia? I only remember hearing about that stuff later on in VH1 documentaries on things like heavy metal suicide. Nevertheless, this movie was put out in 1994 and it’s a piece of work. I am no expert on Satanism, Christianity, or the people in this movie. I will try and do my best. This is probably going to be the longest review I ever have, and possibly, ever will write.

IMG_6831

The problems begin the instant you start the video. Apparently, this was put out or produced by Gun Video Catalog. I can’t help but be a little uncomfortable that a guide for law enforcement is put out by a company that makes videos about guns. Guns are the things that no good police officer wants to deal with in any way shape or form if they don’t have to. Then something funny comes up.

IMG_6832

A viewer discretion warning for police officers? I’m sorry, but if you have chosen that profession, then you have already decided that those things are going to be a part of your life. Plus the title says “Satanic Cults” in it. What would you expect to see? It’s not like it says My Little LaVey: Satan Is Magic or something kiddie. It comes right out and tells you what to expect.

By the way, I didn't try to get him with his eyes closed, but they mostly are because he's dealing with San Francisco Bay winds.

By the way, I didn’t try to get him with his eyes closed, but they mostly are because he’s dealing with San Francisco Bay winds.

Then up comes Gordon L. Coulter. The “Cop/Pastor” in sweaters who is going to take you through this nonsense under the guise of informing law enforcement. Honestly, it’s more like a recruitment video.

IMG_6838

Up comes Satanic imagery. At least one of which is rather humorous and pictured above. Kind of looks like a cross between a scene from A Clockwork Orange (1971) or something you would have seen in an old cartoon. This is the first of several times where Gordon basically complains about two things he doesn’t seem to like about the United States. One, freedom of religion allows people to practice beliefs that he doesn’t approve of. Second, that it’s a shame cops have to follow proper procedure instead of being able to simply drag in any Satanist off the street. I’m being a little harsh, but those messages certainly come across to the viewer. And given things that are said from then on, I seriously doubt I am reading too much into what he says.

IMG_6861

Next up comes “The Three Levels Of Satanism.” First are Dabblers. These are the Christian equivalent of people who just show up on Sunday, but that’s all. The people the movie Super Christian (1980) was directed at. Which by the way, I liked because it had it’s heart in the right place. Then are the people who have “spiritual involvement”. These are the people who might actually believe and are certainly more than just Christians on Sunday. The third are people who have “criminal involvement.” These are the people that hold up in compounds and bomb abortion clinics. Oh wait, he’s talking about Satanists. Sorry, but I can’t recall hearing about many, if any, Satanists in the news my whole life. Whereas David Koresh’s and abortion clinic bombers seemed to always be in the news. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen. There are crazy people who do things in the name of religion all the time. I only bring it up because Gordon uses such broad strokes to condemn every Satanist and make them seem like they are everywhere ready to sacrifice your kids. If so, then Christians are in the same boat.

Great mullet by the way.

Great mullet by the way.

Next we move on to one of the dumbest, most staged, and offensive parts of the film. It begins by saying “Ritual Sites”. Then we are introduced to a “Former Satanic ‘High Priest'” named Eric Pryor. I encourage you to Google this guy. His story is quite interesting. It takes him only a minute or so to take a paranoia film and turn it into something blatantly offensive. Pryor comes right out and says that the people who use the parks are homosexuals and members of the occult. That they interestingly go hand-in-hand. You can imagine what I think of this. Let’s continue.

Notice the Satan Ray?

Notice the Satan Ray?

With that out of the way, Eric magically keeps coming across occult things in a park. An inverted cross. A voodoo VeVe. A rope tied like a noose that supposedly has dried blood on it. Most, if not all, clearly staged. He actually touches the inverted cross and comments that it feels fresh. Maybe because they just finished painting it before the shoot? Also, I looked up Voodoo Veve’s and apparently, they are obliterated during the ritual. That’s why they do them using things like sand. I don’t understand why one would be spray painted on concrete. However, Eric keeps brining up that Satanists love large concrete areas. So do graffiti artists. What park is this by the way? They never tell you. But they sure show this map a lot.

Clearly, an evil park!

Clearly, an evil park!

I’m not stupid, but this confused me for quite a while because there are no markings on this map to show where they “found” these things. It took until almost the end of this section of the video for me to realize that after the map was shown, the next section of the video emerged, starting in a large square, from where it’s supposed to take place. Putting a number or something to identify where this was would have been nice. In fact, at the end of the video when they recap, they do that by placing numbers. It’s needlessly confusing and I kept wondering why they kept showing this map that conveniently glows green like it’s possessed or something. One of the best parts of this is when Eric points and talks about doing a solo in the bushes. Honestly, he uses those words. I know he means that if he were up there to do Satanic things alone, then he would go into the bushes, but after his homophobic statements, I think the worst.

It's that specific bush right over there.

It’s that specific bush right over there.

Next come “The Nine Satanic Statements”. I have never looked into Satanism, but these all read like common sayings with some variation of the word Satan thrown on them. “Satan represents indulgence instead of abstinence.” So does capitalism, among many other things. “Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek.” You could argue that God in the Old Testament does too. “Satan has been the best friend the church has ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years.” You mean like good can’t exist without evil? These are some of the least threatening things I have ever heard. But the music tells me I should be quaking in my boots.

Next come some things that are supposed to cast Satanists as obviously evil people who are going to coax the weak minded. “Gratification of Flesh. Gratification of Ego. POWER.” They could be describing politics or evangelism. None of these things are unique and require a whole special video devoted to point out these things in relation to Satanism. That is of course, even taking their word that these things are part of Satanism. I would have thought of course, but coming after the homophobic statement and the obvious staging in the park, I don’t know.

IMG_6951

Next comes “Initiation”. “A spoken denial of the Christian faith, generally accompanied by saying the Lord’s Prayer backwards.” Oh, you mean Kevin Sorbo’s character in God’s Not Dead (2014)? I thought he was just an atheist, but I guess he could also have made a “promise to sacrifice children to Satan, and marking the initiate with the devil’s mark.” How come I’m not hearing about all these children being sacrificed for Satan?

Now comes the list of crimes that could be red flags for Satanism. Ready! Set! Go!

“Vandalism or Trespass
Cruelty To Animals
Kidnapping
Rape
Molestation
Child Abuse
Child Sexual Abuse
Ritual Abuse
Arson
Murder
Drug Trafficking
Sexual Trafficking of Children
Corpse Theft
Cemetary Vandalism
Black Market Sales Of Bones and Skulls
Black Market Baby Selling
Pedophilia
Pornography
Torture
Church Desecration
Human Slavery
Weapons Violations
Suicide
Disposing Of Animal Parts
Illegal Entry Into Mortuaries and Cemetaries
Necrophilia”

My God! Apparently, any crime could indicate Satanism. I guess when you want to convince cops that Satanists are everywhere, then it’s important to list everything. Not that these things couldn’t be done by a Satanist, but I could go through every single one of these and find members of other religions engaged in them too. This is way too broad to be helpful in the slightest. It only breeds paranoia. Next comes one of the two parts that people frequently mention because it’s funny on sight.

IMG_6983

This is where Eric describes “Tools of Satanism”. It looks like QVC or some shopping channel. Can I get that knife on Easy Pay, Eric?

IMG_6998

Next come the “Cult Symbols”. Inverted cross, sure. 666, yeah. Pentagram, to be expected. “Voodoo ViVi”, then why does it say Voodoo in it? Plus, Eric just explained that Voodoo is different than Satanism? Anarchy symbol? You mean like Sex Pistols fans? Swastika? So Hitler was a Satanist? And I guess that includes Buddhists too. To my knowledge, even Germany which is paranoid about that symbol recognizes it as a legitimate religious symbol for some.

IMG_7015

Next! “Glossary Of Satanic Terms”. I love their definition of a cult: “A group of people who follow a leader, who, through his charismatic ways, command allegiance, belief and worship.” They could be describing the Pope for how broad that statement is. How exactly is that Satanic? Then it muddies the water futher: “Infamous leaders include; Hitler, Crowley, Jim Jones and David Koresh.” Hitler was Christian and so was David Koresh. Crowley, maybe, and Jim Jones, sure, but this is just more confusion. Also, Crowley has a first name. That is unless you meant to point a subtle finger at Ozzy Osbourne’s song Mr. Crowley. After the homophobic stuff, these questions pop into your head.

IMG_7039

I also like the definition of host: “Normally using blessed communion wafers, symbolic of the body of Christ, Satanists insert them into the vagina of the altar, or physically stomp thus desecrating Christian beliefs.” The “vagina” of the altar? Really? You couldn’t have just said opening or something like that? It was necessary to tie it back in with your definition of an altar that “can also be a nude physical female being”? Also, if it wasn’t already clear, nearly all of this “education” is posturing Satanists as trying to destroy Christianity and thus some sort of a holy war needs to be raged against them. But just in case you missed that, here’s what pagans are: “Those who practice witchcraft. The worship of nature as well as multiple gods.” In other words, people who hold belief systems that you disagree with. We all know that’s the actual definition of the word. Of course, I already stated that this is really a recruitment video to bring cops into their movement.

IMG_7056

Now it’s on to “Child Ritual And Sexual Abuse”. We get some shots of kids here. Oddly, one of them is a boy playing with a girl’s doll. How did that end up in here? Well, they say some numbers about the subject, but never cite any sources. Then comes out what seems to be a staple of these videos: the survivor. This girl is simply referred to as “T.S.” and is a “Ritual Abuse Survivor”. As she tells her story, drawings show up on the screen. At first, I thought this was hilarious. They look like they were made by kindergarteners. Just like the map, it wasn’t immediately apparent what the point was to them being there. It turns out these are supposed to represent a child’s rendering of the horrible things Satanists do to them. Couldn’t show newspaper clippings about these crimes that are supposedly happening all over the place? If it’s so common, then they should be easy to find, right? But no, it just goes on to have her recite a poem she wrote about her experiences. I love that it says “helter skelter”, “witches chant”, and “babies burn”. This girl could be telling a true story, but I have no way of knowing. Just as the “statistics” at the beginning of this segment, there are no sources cited. This is just stuff you are being told and expected to believe because, well, they’re Satanists.

IMG_7082

Ready for another list? No, well, too bad, because it’s time for “Symptoms Characterizing Satanic Ritual Abuse And Sexual Abuse In Preschool Age Children”:

“Low self-esteem, feeling of being ‘bad’.
Child feels deserving of punishment.
Child is fearful, clingy, regresses to ‘baby’ behavior
Separation anxiety.
Child is angry, aggressive.
Child acts wild, uncontrolled, hyperactive.
Child is accident prone, or deliberately hurts himself.
Child is negativistic, resistant to authority.
Child mistrusts adults.
Child is overcompliant with authority, overlypleasing with adults.
Child has rapid mood changes.
Child is withdrawn, does not play, or plays in a lethargic or unfocused way.
Child exhibits a short attention span.
Child does not learn.
Child’s speech is regressed and babyish.
Child has a delayed speech or speech disorder.
Child’s speech production decreases significantly.
Somatic complaints; stomach aches, nausea vomiting.
Nightmares, sleep disorders.
Child is fearful of being touched. Fears having genital area washed.
Child touches genitals or masturbates excessively.
Child touches or tries to insert finger into rectum.
Child pulls down pants, pulls up dress or takes off clothes inappropriately
Child touches others sexually or asks for sex.
Child is sexually provacative or seductive.
Child complains of vaginal or anal pain, burning when washed or while urinating or defecating.
Semen or blood stains on child’s underwear.
Detailed and ‘age inappropriate’ understanding of sexual behavior.
‘Hints’ about sexual activity.
Complaints than an adult or older child is ‘bothering’ them.
A reference to blood or ‘white stuff’ in genital area.
Statement that someone had removed the child’s clothes.
Statement that an older child or adult exposed themselves to the child.
Statement that child touched an older child’s or adult’s bottom, vagina, rectum, mouth, etc.
Statement that an older child or adult touched or penetrated child’s bottom, vagina, rectum, mouth, etc.
Statement that the child witnessed sex acts.
On exam, relaxed sphincter, anal or rectal lacerations or scarring, child relaxes rather than tenses rectum when touched.
On exam, enlargement of vaginal opening, vaginal laceration or scarring in girls. Sore penis in boys. Blood or trauma in genital area.
On exam, veneral disease.”

Wow! That’s some list of things that could indicate Satanism. I can’t possibly hit all the problems with this. First off, I am not saying that I might not have made a few typos, but a lot of them are in the video. Apparently, they didn’t bother to proofread this thing. I love how they chose preschool age so that the children are old enough to really exhibit things, but as early as possible in order to horrify us as much as possible. I also love how children are victims of “Satanic Ritual Abuse” whether they are “negativistic, resistant to authority” or “overcompliant with authority, overlypleasing with adults.” So if the child doesn’t like authority, as most don’t, then Satanists might be involved. If the child behaves, then Satanists might also be involved. And what exactly counts as “overcompliant”? Agreeing to wash out your mouth with soap? Taking punishment in general? If this is truly going to help cops identify that Satanism might be the mindset behind some form of child abuse, then don’t you think you might want to be a little more specific? Of course not. At this point, I’m convinced there are Satanists hiding in the bushes of my backyard waiting to sacrifice my dog.

IMG_7120

Can you believe this thing keeps going? Next they talk about “Youth Involvement”. This is where we finally get a voice of reason. A Sacramento, CA Probation Officer named Kelly McGhee. Did this guy even know what kind of video he was being interviewed for? He sounds like he might actually have a good head on his shoulders. Well, enough of that! It’s time for the Satanic Calendar.

Trick or Treat or Satanic Cults?

Trick or Treat or Satanic Cults?

I’ll spare you the list, but it’s noteworthy that Halloween is listed here. Apparently, on Halloween “sex with demons is primary.” What? This video for cops believes demons exist? This is probably the time to mention that the people behind this video were involved with a movement known as Spiritual Warfare. Look it up for yourself, but a key part of it is that things like demons and witchcraft are very real and that you must remain vigilant. It’s no wonder this video is the way it is.

IMG_7150

Finally, they bring up some actual cases. My two favorites are “Richard Berkowitz” and Ricky Kasso. Have you ever heard someone refer to David Berkowitz by his middle name? I haven’t. However, when I Google Richard Berkowitz, a prominent gay author and activist of the period pops up. Again, the way the video is, I have to question if this wasn’t intentional. As for Ricky Kasso. This is one of those famous heavy metal cases from the 80’s. The biggest tie to Satanism here seems to be that he was a fan of heavy metal and had an AC/DC shirt. It all has as much basis in fact as David Berkowitz saying a dog told him to kill people. But Gordon is quite careful with his words here. He doesn’t mention that part, but just that Kasso “required his victim to say ‘I love you Satan’ as he stabbed him to death.” That’s all. I guess that makes Dead Kennedys’ Christians since they say “God told me to skin you alive” in their song I Kill Children. The connection is incredibly weak. People will say all sorts of stuff. Especially to blame other things for their actions. Gordon also says all this like he’s John Walsh on America’s Most Wanted.

IMG_7158

But then comes the feature presentation of this section. The case of Clifford St. Joseph. Google that one. It’s a bit of a mess, and from what I have read, is on some shaky police work ground. However, this time Gordon actually has someone else talk about the case. Enter Prentice E. Sanders, Homicide Inspector, San Francisco Police Department. If you live in the San Francisco Bay Area, then this guy is kind of famous. He was the first African American police chief. However, he was also involved in the “Fajitagate” scandal. I remember that one, not because of the case itself, but the name sticks in your mind. Sanders was later cleared by the courts. It’s interesting in retrospect that this is the guy they talk to considering Clifford St. Joseph has also fought to clear his name. Again, Google it and make up your own mind. After talking about the case, he just goes on to give some good advice like “Educate Yourself” and “Investigate”.

IMG_7170

Then comes possibly the most ridiculous visual thing in the movie. This is the other thing you’ll see posted everywhere. Gordon comes out to a slab with two pillars behind it and pulls back a blanket to reveal a girl in a checkerboard bikini. Really? Couldn’t use a dummy? Instead, it’s necessary to get a young attractive woman, put Satanic symbols on her body, and then point to them over and over. Really?

It ends with Gordon basically saying there are Satanists hiding in every community, small and large, so BEWARE! Then the credits roll. I Googled some of these people. There are only two people I’m gonna mention. First, the producer/director is listed as Devin DeHaven. The only Devin DeHaven I can find is a guy who is heavily involved with making music related material. Even if this isn’t the same guy, I still find it funny that the only Devin DeHaven I find works with hard rock and heavy metal bands. He even worked with Incubus.

The other is “Pastor Dick Bernal”. Again, Google him. He’s very much around to this day. Even on Twitter. In fact, he recently made the news in my neck of the woods. However, in his defense, it’s not so much his homophobia that’s to blame, but the stupid ABC reporter that thought they should ask him if he would perform a gay marriage. It appears that as of late June of this year, he has put all weddings on hold now that same-sex marriage has been made legal in the United States.

From what I can gather, both Gordon L. Coulter and Eric Pryor have passed away. In all honesty, I hope Eric found some peace after the whirlwind that seems to have been his life. I also hope that Gordon moved on with his and tried to forget about this video. But I invite you to do that research if you want. I’m moving on with my life.

Film Review: Programmed To Kill/The Retaliator (1987, dir. Allan Holzman & Robert Short)


Samira (Sandahl Bergman)

Samira (Sandahl Bergman)

That screenshot look promising? Well, it isn’t. Programmed to kill? More like programmed to bore. This movie is like Atomic Cyborg in that it’s a Terminator inspired movie. However, unlike Atomic Cyborg, this movie is awful.

I would love to say the movie is about Samira who is captured after participating in a terror attack in Greece and turned into a killing machine, but it’s not. Look at this shot below and guess when it happens out of the 90 minute running time.

I bet that number you thought of wasn’t 40 minutes! Take a look at the shot below when she kills someone in the field as a cyborg and take another guess.

This happens at 52 minutes. It takes this movie 52 minutes to capture her, transform her, and send her into the field. The movie is only 90 minutes long with credits! Just wow! What the movie is actually about is this guy who captures her, then tries to track her down to finish her off.

Eric Mathews (Robert Ginty)

Eric Mathews (Robert Ginty)

The majority of the film is with him, his wife, and kid. The rest of the time is the surgery and exposition. I love when they are walking down this underground hall with pipes running it’s length. Why? So they have plenty of time to tell us that their plan to turn her against her own people by transforming her into a cyborg is going to backfire down the road. What a waste of time! I wonder if the VHS release of this had a sticker on the front of it that said “Press Here” so it’s audience would know how to insert it into the VCR. Oh wait, this was for an audience expecting something kind of cool so maybe it says “insert to fucking box” like Explosive Fighter Patton for the Famicom Disk System does.

At least we can hope that the action, when it happens, is good, right? Nope, it sucks. The stuff near the end kind of suffers from the 2014 Godzilla problem of not putting enough light on the action. Not that much is going on anyways, but still. I really love this shot below.

It’s clearly supposed to be all arty and dramatic as he talks about how she is out to get those who wronged her, but oh please. It’s like the movie wanted to be taken seriously. As if it had an important message to deliver it’s audience. Atomic Cyborg covers the same sort of territory so much better and has arm wrestling. The best you get here is when she calls up a guy and screeches so loud into the phone that his ear bleeds, he crashes the car, and dies. I’m sorry, but if I want murder by phone, then I’ll watch Murder By Phone (1982).

There is one bright point though. Eric’s son is played by none other than Paul Walker!

Paul Walker

Paul Walker

That’s a good thing for me because it means I can mention Tammy and the T-Rex again. Otherwise, there is no bright point to this movie. It’s just terrible. Please watch Atomic Cyborg or Lady Terminator instead.

Val’s Movie Roundup #6: Good Witch Edition


Unfortunately, the only movies in this series that were available for streaming were the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th films. I am renting the others and will review them at a later date.

The Good Witch's Family

The Good Witch’s Family (2011) – Here’s what I can gather in general about this series. Catherine Bell plays a witch named Cassandra Nightingale who owns an antique/miscellaneous items store in the town of Middleton. Not a witchcraft store really, although it is called Bell, Book, and Candle. She is married and has two children that don’t appear to be her biological ones. I don’t think they really explain that at this point, but I’m pretty sure they’re her husband’s kids. Maybe in the earlier films. Luckily, it isn’t important. You can jump into this series with any of these four films and not really feel lost. Basically, Cassandra stands around looking pretty in nicely chosen outfits acting like Jadzia Dax from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine while minor and meaningless micro-plots pop up around her, resolve, and the movie ends. Honestly, that’s it. It can be pretty boring. Some of these more than others.

This one revolves around a bridge that is going to be built before the town is annexed by Delaware. The mayor likes it while the mayor’s wife doesn’t. They want Cassie to become mayor. Because “family” is in the title, the movie has a tie in with Cassie’s family. In this case, a recently rediscovered family member turns up and causes some trouble using her own witchcraft. All the witchcraft in this is very subtle and implied, not really explicit. Cassie figures out her motives pretty early, but lets things go until it’s time to wrap things up.

This one, like the others is boring, but average. I really must say that the outfits chosen for Bell are quite nice. They do a good job dressing her. It’s a minor thing, but it was enough that I noticed.

The Good Witch's Charm

The Good Witch’s Charm (2012) – Now this Good Witch movie is a stinker. Cassie is now the mayor. There’s a newborn. And a little crimewave is going on. A very minor crimewave. Cassie is caught on video teleporting. I mentioned before that the magic is implied in this series. We do see her suddenly show up when a character turns around, but we never actually see the trick pulled. This time it’s explicit. The video goes viral and a reporter shows up. It’s probably worth mentioning that there is a lady who owns a shop nearby and she is always around. Also, Cassie’s foster mom shows up in town.

Again, a bunch of minor plots that all resolve without really providing anything but an excuse to check your Twitter feed. This just happens to be a particularly boring one. The stupid video thing is stupid and the resolution will have you irritated. If you do enjoy these movies, then I would hop over this one. Even someone who dubs themselves as a lover of Hallmark movies on IMDb said this was pretty boring.

The Good Witch's Destiny

The Good Witch’s Destiny (2013) – This movie is a notch up from The Good Witch’s Charm, but it’s still not the totally average experience of The Good Witch’s Family. There are again micro-plots, but the “destiny” of the title has to do with something her daughter is investigating. At this point, she is in college. She wants to write a paper on the backstory of a family member whose portrait is hung in their house. They refer to her as the Grey Lady. There was some sort of fire and it happened on or around her birthday. Since Cassie’s birthday is coming up, the daughter is worried.

Of course, there’s never anything to worry about when Cassie is around. Maybe she’s always so laid back and confident, not because she is anything like Jadzia Dax with lifetime’s of knowledge, but since she always reads the scripts. This one is wholly unremarkable, but it will not annoy you like The Good Witch’s Charm. I really don’t expect much from a Hallmark movie. They are usually rather formulaic, but these one’s that are really just TV Shows made up of TV Movie episodes seem to be pretty boring. Not sure why that’s a thing. The other Hallmark movies don’t do that. Oh, well. This one’s okay.

The Good Witch's Wonder

The Good Witch’s Wonder (2014) – The biggest problem with this one is that Cassie cut her hair! Catherine Bell looked so pretty with long hair that had bangs. Otherwise, this is the best of the four. Again, some micro-plots, but it has a decent major plot that can keep your attention. No, not the son getting married. Yeah, there’s a son, and the fact that it took so long for me to mention him tells you how important his existence is.

The major plot is basically ripped from a Lifetime movie. A girl is clearly needing a place to hide out and becomes an employee of Cassie’s. A douchebag shows up under the pretenses of doing some work for that lady with the other shop, but he’s really there to come after her. He wants her to steal something for him, then he’ll leave her alone. You know where this all goes. It’s just nice to have a real plot that the movie focuses on and that it is somewhat interesting. This is the best of the four I watched.

I fully intend to get the first three films and if a commenter on IMDb is right, this series lost it’s magic by The Good Witch’s Family where I came in. So hopefully those movies will be better.