Dysfunction Junction : Carta Monir’s “Lara Croft Was My Family”


Ryan C. (fourcolorapocalypse)'s avatarRyan C.'s Four Color Apocalypse

When you can construct a fully-formed, emotionally resonant, deeply poignant comics memoir in just 40 pages, you’re probably an extraordinary cartoonist. When you can do it in 40 panels? Then take a well-deserved bow, because you’re downright otherworldly.

Now, before you mention it, rest assured  that I’m fully aware that it’s considered bad form for a critic to “give away the game” in the opening paragraph of a review like I just did, but fuck it — Carta Monir doesn’t mess around in Lara Croft Was My Family, and I intend to follow her lead. To that end, I’m going to be uncharacteristically short, sweet, and to the point here, because this is a work that seems to demand exactly that sort of analysis, given that it’s deliberately structured (and magnificently, at that) to achieve maximum impact with minimal bells and whistles — but please don’t take…

View original post 588 more words

The Haunting of Hill House, S1E1, Steven Sees a Ghost, Review By Case Wright


HH1

Happy Horrorthon! Hill House came early this year.  Here we go!

Hill House has been remade many different ways.  This time it’s done by Mike Flanagan of Gerald’s Game (Netflix).  The show splits its time between then and now.  It opens “Then” with Timothy Hutton in a very big and creepy house with a bunch of kids.  We learn through A LOT of exposition that Steven has grown up to be paranormal writer.  The cuts between then and now aren’t too bad, but it does diffuse the tension.

The kids handled the trauma of growing up in a haunted house with varied acceptance.  Steven is a paranormal investigator.  The oldest sister works at funeral home. Luke grew up to be an alcoholic. Nellie grew up to be disturbed.  There’s another sister who’s a sex addict.  I’m halfway into the episode and I am kinda bored.  They try to sell the show as the next Stranger Things, but I’m not sure if this show is even the next Whitney.  This show is a lot of things, but it is not worthy at this point of being in the same sentence as Season 1 Stranger Things.  

This show has 20 minutes left to get good and my hopes are low.

Nellie is one of the many family members who has grown up all messed up.  She is drawn back to Hill House I suppose because she wants to do some lawn maintenance.

The story, once again, shifts to the past and Steven and the dad need to escape the house because they are being pursued by a ghost.  Apparently, their mom was possessed by a ghost and they have to flee and leave mom behind (awkward mother’s day coming up).  Funny how divorce can just creep up on a couple after 20 years of marriage; you look over and realize that you and your spouse are different people; in that, you are a person and she is possessed by a demon.

Nellie has returned to Hill House literally and starts dancing around.  It’s weird.  The show jump cuts to Steven to an explaining session that her house is not haunted, but he’ll make it seem haunted in the book and the lady looks at him with contempt because he’s a fraud.  We learn that Steven is a failed novelist who cashed in on the family drama by writing the Haunting of Hill House.  This caused Steven and his sister to become estranged.

The show flashes back and actually does a good job at showing why Luke is so traumatized.  Apparently, one of the Hill House ghosts was harassing him when he was young and that trauma triggered his lifelong addiction.

The show flashes to Steven again as an adult.  He catches his brother with the substance abuse problem leaving his apartment with all of his electronics.  Steven gets the brother to give him his stuff back.  When he finally goes inside, he finds Nell at his home and the first scary thing happens in the whole show: Steve’s dad calls and says that Nell went to the hill house and she’s dead.  So……the Nell that is in Steve’s house is a GHOOOOOOOST.  BOO!  Nell does some ghosty stuff that’s kinda spooooky.

I don’t know if there will be second review of this show.  I will definitely watch another episode, but I’m not ready to get married to it yet.  I think it could have some potential, but Stranger Things had me the first murder in the first 30 seconds.  So far, this is more slow exposition than slow burn, but I will give it a fair shot.

Cheers!

Horror on TV: Kolchak: The Night Stalker 1.2 “The Zombie” (dir by Alexander Grasshoff)


Tonight, on Kolchak: The Night Stalker:

Chicago gangsters are turning up dead!  Is it a mob war or is it something else?  Kolchak suspects the latter and, as you can guess from this episode’s title, he’s right.  This episode features gangsters, numbers runners, and voodoo!

It originally aired on September 20th, 1974!

Enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aN_GstECzL0

Horror Film Review: I Married A Monster From Outer Space (dir by Gene Fowler, Jr)


The 1958 film I Married A Monster From Outer Space tells the story of Marge (Gloria Talbott) and Bill Farrell (Tom Tryon).

Just one year ago, they seemed like the perfect couple.  They were newlyweds, looking forward to starting a family and living in a nice house in the suburbs.  Bill seemed like the perfect guy, warm, friendly, humorous, and loving.

However, things have changed.  On their one-year anniversary, Bill is cold and distant.  He certainly seems to have little interest in romance or anything like that.  When Marge gives Bill a new dog as his anniversary present, he doesn’t seem to be sure how to react to it.  When the dog later ends up dead, Bill gives her an implausible excuse.

Bill has changed but he’s not the only one.  Marge notices that all of her friend’s husbands are acting strange as well.  It’s as if something has magically turned every man into the neighborhood into a stiff, humorless jerk.

(Either that or it’s the 50s!)

One night, Marge decides to follow Bill into the forest and she sees something that challenges everything that she previously thought she knew about her husband.  What does she discover?  Well, it’s right there in the title.  Marge has married a monster from outer space!

I imagine that most people’s natural instinct with a film like this is to make fun of the title and just go on from there but actually, I Married A Monster From Outer Space is an intelligent and well-done sci-fi film.  Gloria Talbott does a great job in the lead role and Tom Tryon’s rather stiff screen presence is perfectly suited for the role of Alien-Bill.  Gene Fowler, Jr. directs the film as if it were a film noir where the usual gangsters and bank robbers have been replaced by humanoid aliens who don’t like dogs.

Since this movie is from 1958, there’s all sorts of subtext creeping around.  The most obvious, of course, is that America is being invaded from within.  You don’t think your husband could be an alien?  Well, Alger Hiss’s mother probably didn’t think her son was a communist spy!  You think it’s a silly idea that normal seeming humans would be working to conquer the world?  Have you not heard of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg?  When Bill and the other men turn cold and impersonal, it’s easy to see that they’ve embraced an ideology opposed to individual freedom and we all know what that means.

However, for me, this film works because it strikes at a very primal fear.  How well do you really know the people who you love?  Is he always going to be as perfect as he seems when you first start going out or is he going to totally change once he’s sure that you’re not going to leave him?  Like many women who have tried to escape from abusive boyfriends and spouses, Marge discovers that no one believes her.  She lives in a world controlled by men and all of the men have been taken over by the same thing that’s taken over Bill.  Even if you’ve never married a monster from outer space, you know what Marge is going through.

So, don’t dismiss this film because of the melodramatic title.  I Married A Monster From Outer Space is an intelligent sci-fi horror film, one that’s still relevant today.

Feeling the Burn: Death Spa (1989, directed by Michael Fischa)


Michael (William Bumiller) owns the hottest health club in Los Angeles but that may not stay true if he can’t do something about all the guests dying.  Members get baked alive in the sauna.  Another is killed when a malfunctioning workout machine pulls back his arms and causes a rib to burst out of one side of his body.  Shower tiles fly off the wall and panic a bunch of naked women.  A woman loses her arm in a blender and a man is somehow killed by a frozen fish.  Strangely, all of the deaths don’t seem to hurt business as people still keep coming to the gym.  Surely, there are other, safer health clubs in Los Angeles.

Michael suspects that his brother-in-law, David (Merritt Butrick), might be to blame for all of the trouble.  David is good with computers and since this movie is from 1989, that means that he can do anything.  (David is described as being a “hacker,” which may be the first time that overused term was used in a film.)  Michael feels that David has never forgiven him for the suicide of his sister.  Two useless cops show up to investigate the murders while the spa gets ready for Mardi Gras night.

This incredibly cheesy horror movie used to be a mainstay on HBO, where young viewers like me appreciated all of the gore and slightly older viewers appreciated all of the nudity.  Viewed today, Death Spa is a real nostalgia trip.  From the leg warmers to the bulky computers to the choreographed workout routines, this is a movie that could only have been made in the 80s.  The plot is beyond stupid but some of the gore effects were well-executed and that scene where the frozen fish comes to life continues to amaze.  Sadly, this was Merritt Butrick’s last film.  The actor, who was best known for playing Captain’s Kirk’s son in The Wrath of Khan and The Search for Spock, died the same year that Death Spa was released.

Horror Review: “One for the Road” (by Stephen King)


Stephen King’s writing style in “One for the Road” exemplifies his mastery of atmosphere, character voice, and narrative restraint. While much of his later work often invests heavily in world-building over long stretches, this short story demonstrates his ability to deliver a rich, immersive experience in a concise format. His choices here, both stylistic and structural, serve the story’s central purpose: to convey unspoken dread and the inevitability of evil.

The story serves as a chilling epilogue to ’Salem’s Lot, set during a brutal New England winter many years after a fire destroyed the infamous town. Told by Booth, an elderly local from nearby Falmouth, it begins in the warm familiarity of Herb Tookey’s bar, where Booth and Herb are longstanding fixtures. Their evening is interrupted when Gerald Lumley, cold and near collapse, stumbles in. Lumley explains that his car broke down in the snow miles away, and that he left his wife and daughter in the vehicle while seeking help. Tension deepens when he reveals the breakdown happened near Jerusalem’s Lot—a place everyone in the area fears but rarely discusses. Despite knowing the dangers, Booth and Herb reluctantly agree to help him return.

Their journey into the storm is both physically taxing and emotionally tense, as the two locals understand all too well what they might find. As they approach the outskirts of The Lot, King uses sparse detail and implication to build dread. By the time they reach Lumley’s car, the supernatural horror makes itself known, hammering home the message that evil never truly dies—it lingers, waiting for an opportunity to strike.

King’s decision to frame “One for the Road” within a harsh New England winter is critical to its success. The cold itself becomes an antagonist—slowing movement, reducing visibility, and draining the characters’ strength—adding a physical urgency to the supernatural threat. Snowstorms are a recurring motif in his work (The ShiningStorm of the Century) because they isolate the characters, making escape impossible and forcing confrontation with whatever is lurking nearby. The blizzard in this story intensifies feelings of claustrophobia, despite the vastness of the open, rural landscape.

King also makes the setting deeply familiar for his readers. Falmouth feels like a lived-in place, with its bar, locals who know one another’s routines, and whispered legends about The Lot. The story doesn’t waste time describing Jerusalem’s Lot in detail; instead, its horrors exist in the margins, in what the locals refuse to say.

The choice of Booth as the first-person narrator adds authenticity and intimacy. Booth speaks with the cadence of an elder New Englander—practical, reserved, and hardened by experience. Readers never doubt that this is the account of someone who understands the local history and its dangers. The conversational delivery, sprinkled with regional colloquialisms, draws the reader into the moment rather than presenting a polished, detached recounting.

Rather than sensationalizing The Lot’s horrors, Booth lets them linger unsaid. King understands that withholding explicit details can fuel imagination more effectively than extravagant description. This restraint makes the story’s climax more impactful because the dread has been steadily fed through implication.

The story’s pacing is deliberate but tight. King introduces the danger early—Lumley’s car is stranded near Jerusalem’s Lot—then uses the journey back to extend suspense. The structure mirrors a descent into darkness: starting in the relative safety of Herb Tookey’s bar, venturing into the blizzard, and finally confronting the true horror at the edge of The Lot. King avoids unnecessary subplots, instead focusing on a single mission: rescuing Lumley’s family. This gives the narrative relentless forward motion while allowing tension to rise in small increments.

One of King’s most notable thematic choices is the portrayal of evil as a constant, indestructible force. In ’Salem’s Lot, that evil once emanated from the Marsten House, a decaying mansion that served as both the symbolic and literal heart of darkness. By the time of “One for the Road,” however, the Marsten House has been burned down and stripped of its power. Yet, rather than eradicating the evil, its essence has expanded outward—the town itself has inherited its malign influence. The Lot has effectively become the new Marsten House, and its ruined streets and frozen remains now radiate the same dark gravity that once resided solely within those walls. King transforms the geography of evil: what was once contained in a single haunted house has transposed itself over the entire landscape, infecting the air, the snow, and the silence with something sentient and waiting.

King also plays with the tension between duty and self-preservation. Booth and Herb could have ignored Lumley’s plea. Their choice to help—despite knowing what might await them—aligns with King’s recurring motif that true courage lies in facing evil with no guarantee of victory.

Even when weaving atmosphere, King exercises a tight control over detail. The bar scene is economical: we know just enough about Herb, Booth, and their friendship to trust their dynamic. The blizzard is described vividly but without purple prose. This brevity forces the reader to focus on what matters—the growing realization that Lumley’s family is in mortal danger. The vampires themselves receive minimal “screen time,” a deliberate choice that allows the prior suspense to make their eventual appearance all the more devastating.

As a companion piece, “One for the Road” functions as both a continuation and a tonal reinforcement of ’Salem’s Lot. Rather than tying up loose ends, King emphasizes that nothing was truly resolved. Evil is only temporarily held back, and the destruction of the town did not remove its blight. By telling the story through outsiders who skirt the edge of The Lot without entering deeply into it, King preserves the town’s mystique, forcing readers to imagine the horrors that remain—an imaginative space where dread thrives long after the last page.

Nightmares and Dreamscapes: From the stories of Stephen King, Battleground, Review by Case Wright


bg4.jpg

Happy Horrorthon!!! I decided to do a bit of a hybrid review of one of my favorite stories:  “Battleground” by Stephen King.  This book is part of a short story anthology in Night Shift.  Battleground was written in 1972 by King.  This was back in the days when he wasn’t just hungry, he was starving.  He was working in laundries, substitute teaching, maybe even a paper route.  This particular work was published in Cavalier, which was a low-rent Playboy.  In those days, he would sell stories to Swank – a low-rent Penthouse as well.  Many of these stories were real gems or at least gems in the rough.  For example, Night Surf (Cavalier and Night Shift) evolved into his opus The Stand about a decade later.  Battleground was made into a 52 minute long episode of the above short-lived series (watch them on youtube before they are taken down!!!).

This episode starred William Hurt and like the short-story there is ZERO dialogue, giving the episode a silent movie feel that is very compelling.  Throughout the episode, you only hear ambient noise or grunts or yells, but no spoken dialogue.  In fact, even when a newscaster is announcing that a murder has taken place, it’s done with subtitles.  This is as close to genius television as it gets.  I was truly saddened that it was not renewed.

The episode depicts William Hurt as a nameless hitman who is taskered to kill a toymaker.  He does.  When Hurt goes back home to his San Francisco condo, he receives a package.  Inside the package is compilation of army men and “additional surprises”.  These aren’t your grandpa’s plastic army men; however, they are alive and they have cruel intentions for Mr. Hurt!

Within moments of opening the package, the army men attack William Hurt in very Army like fashion. They take a covered position under Hurt’s couch and open fire, forcing William to flee to the bathroom.  This solace is short-lived because they have mini-howitzers.  Yes, I was primed to like this one.  There are even mini-helicopters that attack Hurt and they send nasty notes to one another demanding and refusing surrender.

The battle to avenge the toy maker’s death continues even out to the ledge of the building, which is likely an Easter Egg to another King story “The Ledge”.  Hurt prevails against the army men, but there are two more “Additional Surprises” 1) a commando who very resourceful and 2) a mini thermonuclear device.  The mini thermonuclear device is the only dumb part of the story because there is no such thing as a tiny Thermonuclear reaction – these are atoms we’re fusing or splitting afterall.  If detonated (regardless of its “mini” nature) , it would’ve destroyed all of San Francisco, but let’s give King- a liberal arts major- a break on that one because it’s still a fun story.

I will review a few more of these stories that were in Night Shift or episodes from this show.

Happy Halloween!!!!

Horror Scenes That I Love: The Devil Is Everywhere In Haxan


Today’s scene that I love comes from the 1922 silent film, Haxan!

Haxan is a documentary, one that recreates the history of witchcraft throughout the ages.  In this scene, the film examines the belief that the devil is everywhere.  Apparently, the Devil has a lot of free time on his hands.

Directed by Benjamin Christensen, Haxan was a Swedish film that was released in its native country in 1922 but which took 7 years to make it over the United States.  Though contemporary audiences were a bit confused by it, it was popular with the surrealists and it quickly became one of the first true cult movies.  It was even re-released in 1967 with a narration provided by Beat writer William S. Burroughs.

Haxan, like many silent films, exists in many different forms.  Needless to say, the censors were not kind when this film originally made its way over to the United States.  It wasn’t until 2001 that Haxan was fully restored and released as a part of the Criterion Collection.

Halloween Havoc!: THE MUMMY’S HAND (Universal 1940)


gary loggins's avatarcracked rear viewer

Universal revived The Mummy in 1940’s THE MUMMY’S HAND, but except for the backstory (and judicious use of stock footage), there’s no relation to the 1932 Karloff classic . Instead of Imhotep we’re introduced to Kharis, the undead killing machine, as the High Priest of Karnak (Eduardo Cianelli in old age makeup) relates the tale of Princess Ananka, whose tomb is broken into by Kharis, who steals the sacred tanna leaves to try and bring her back to life. Kharis gets busted, and is condemned to be buried alive! For he “who shall defile the temple of the gods, a cruel and violent death shall be his fate, and never shall his soul find rest for all eternity. Such is the curse of Amon-Ra, king of all the gods”. So there!

The High Priest croaks, making Andoheb (George Zucco ) the new High Priest. Meanwhile in Cairo, Americans Steve…

View original post 591 more words

4 Shots From 4 Silent Horror Films: The Golem, Haxan, The Student of Prague, The Fall of the House of Usher


4 Shots From 4 Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films lets the visuals do the talking.

Horror is one of the oldest genres around and just to prove it, here are….

4 Shots From 4 Silent Horror Films

The Golem (1920, dir by Paul Wegener)

Haxan (1922, dir by Benjamin Christensen)

The Student of Prague (1926, dir by Henrik Galeen)

The Fall of the House of Usher (1928, dir by Jean Epstein)