‘Zero Dark Thirty’ Review (dir. Kathryn Bigelow)


“Zero Dark Thirty” opens with the sounds of frantic emergency calls from people trapped inside the World Trade Center. Their cries for help to dispatchers, played over a black screen, is a shocking reminder of the horrors of 9/11, and sets the tone for what is to come – the brutal and riveting retelling of the dark paths and dead ends this country traveled in the hunt for Osama bin Laden, the man responsible for those attacks.

What makes “Zero Dark Thirty”, a film with an ending we all already know, so effective is how tautly it depicts the events that led up to bin Laden’s death in such an intellectually and morally challenging way. There is no flash, no melodrama, no varnished surfaces or sanded edges to make the material more bearable or ‘entertaining’, it simply tells it as it is. This is done with meticulous detail by Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal. They tell this story through the eyes of a female CIA operative, played by Jessica Chastain, whose obsession with finding bin Laden was the driving force that led to his death. This performance by Chastain, who carries the film, is quite astonishing. She displays such a wonderful level of assurance, confidence and determination but also the weight of her obsession – doing most of this with her eyes. We know nothing about her character other than the work she did to find bin Laden but we still root for her the whole way. It is one of those subtle but powerful performances that will be remembered for much longer than any other performance this year.

Now, at this point in time, it would be impossible to write a review without addressing some of the criticisms the film has drawn. Honestly, I have to say that I find it quite disheartening that morally insecure and intellectually lazy people have tried to bring the film down for not making moral decisions for them. I am disgusted by the claims that the film is pro-torture for not taking a side as to whether such techniques as water boarding are right or wrong. The simple fact is it doesn’t have to. It isn’t the films responsibilities to do such things. All it wishes to do is relay the facts, as it knows them. It is then up to the audience, based on what they see, to make these decisions.

It is true that in doing so it reveals some truths, many we might not like, that makes us reexamine the past decade of American history. But this is what makes the film more than just a masterfully crafted thriller. There is no arguing this country has had some very dark moments over the past decade  – Abu Ghraib – and the search for revenge to capture or kill those responsible for 9/11 was the driving force of most of this. In making “Zero Dark Thirty” Bigelow and Boal aren’t trying to say whether any of this was right or wrong, but rather they looked to remind us that it did happen and challenges us to question how it truly effected us all and make the decisions ourselves as to the moral nature and effectiveness of torture and war; while at the same time allowing us to appreciate and honor the hard work and sacrifice of those who gave so much in trying to protect this country.

This is made quite clear at the end of the film with its final shot, which I think is perhaps one of the most important in any film in recent years. After the films harrowing opening and what comes after – the remembrance of the horrors of 9/11, the journey down the dark paths revenge took us, including torture and the horrors of war – we are disgusted by what happened, but like the films main character we knew it was happening yet we kept moving forward because we had our ‘eyes on the prize’. In the end, after all was said and done, it is hard to truly rejoice when the full weight of what had happened is realized. Chastain’s face in the films final moment sums this up perfectly. A sort of “what now…was it worth it…what parts of ourselves were lost to accomplish or fight this war on terror?” We killed the man who essentially started this war, a sliver of justice was delivered to those who have lost family and friends, but that war didn’t end with his death, and it will always haunt us no matter how many body bags we fill. The implications of this scene, and the whole film, are bigger than any scene or any film in recent memory.

Thinking back, it is quite amazing how well the whole emotional trajectory of the film so well mirrors the emotional trajectory of this country in the last ten years. From its black screen opening to the close up of Chastain before the credits, “Zero Dark Thirty” intimately reflects on the sadness and shock, that led to anger and war, that was followed by frustration, that led to apathy, which ultimately ended with rejoice…only to quickly then be overshadowed by the full weight of post-9/11 America and where the past decade has left us. It is because of this that I think “Zero Dark Thirty” is not only the best but also the most important film of 2012, or even in recent years. It is a masterfully and tautly crafted thriller that challenges the viewer in ways that will leave us talking about it for years to come. Its moral ambiguity and apolitical stance reveal truths usually overshadowed by preachy, overtly political films of the same nature. If that isn’t the formula for a modern masterpiece, then I don’t know what is.

*Read Arleigh’s comment below for his perfect expansion on the feelings towards the criticisms the film has drawn*

5 responses to “‘Zero Dark Thirty’ Review (dir. Kathryn Bigelow)

  1. Agree on the decision the filmmakers took on how to tell this story. It’s almost doucmentary-like in it’s details and how they’re presented. I know people have been down on Fincher but this film had a similar feel and tone to Zodiac.

    All the President’s Men also shared the same tone and narrative style. We’re left to decide on our own whether we condone or or not the means and techniques used to finish “the job” and “the mission”.

    I can sympathize with those who want the film to take a side, but that would’ve been the easy way out. I’m sure if asked for their personal take on the subject matter in the film both Bigelow and Boal will tell their opinions, but that wasn’t what they were going for. Saying the film was bad or cowardly for not taking side on the issue of terror is like saying we as an audience can dictate what should a filmmaker do to tell their story.

    It’s hubris on the monday-morning film critics and bloggers who think they know better than the people making the film. That is what’s more insulting for me as someone who watches film both as entertainment and thought-provoking media.

    Who are we to decide how a filmmaker should make their film? Whether the film ends up being bad or not is irrelevent. It’s not our film or our story. Critique the film on whether the filmmakers succeeded in telling a well-made tale and whether they were masters at their tradecraft or not. But don’t go sitting there behind the monitor and tell me and everyone who can hear that you think you know better than them what sort of moral stance (if the film should even take such a stance) a fillm should take to satisfy your own personal opinions on past and present events.

    I know it’s a cop out on my part to say this, but I think it fits. People who think and talk like that should try doing their own film or book or whatever if they feel so strongly about the subject matter.

    Just like Soderbergh’s Traffic this film by Bigelow and Boal wants to lay out the facts as they’ve come to know and discover and let them speak for itself. Let the story convince or not whether they think torture and some of the darker aspects of the “War On Terror” was justified or morally bankrupt.

    The ironic thing about this film is how much it has brought the dividing aspects of politics as we see them now into the how we deal with films. For everyone who thought the film was pro-torture others thought it was anti-American for the filmmakers to air out secrets they shouldn’t have been made privy to.

    All the polarizing talk on the film’s moral stance or lack of it has masked the fact that Zero Dark Thirty is not just one of the best films of the last ten years but also one of the most important. It’s a film that can’t be tied down to a label of what it is. It’s story is relevant now and, most likely, for decades to come as a near-perfect snapshot of the world after Sept. 11, 2001.

    My own opinion on the subject matter portrayed in the film is my own and whether it went lockstep with the film I saw as irrelevent because I didn’t know the facts and the film helped educate me. Did it change or reinforce my own personal beliefs on the subject matter would be hard to say since the film didn’t try to do that. What it did try to do is show me that for all that I think I know in the end I really didn’t know anything and I’m sure there’s stacks and stacks more of information we’ll never know, but this film was a beginning.

    It’s a rare thing that a film nowadays actually tries to be neutral when it comes to showing an audience something difficult to sit through. For all the talk some do about how Hollywood and some filmmakers in the system have been dumbing down the media for the masses Bigelow and Boal have done the opposite and allowing the audience to actually to come to their own concusion.

    They don’t want people to universally love their film, but I think it’s an insult to them to condemn them and their film when they’ve either not seen it or watched it with an agenda that squashes any attempts to view it somewhat objectively. I say somewhat since we all bring our own biases when we watch a film for the first time, but some just can never watch a film and try to watch it with open eyes and open minds.

    For once, my disgust for the snubbing of Bigelow as a director has been dampened. I’m glad she won’t be up on stage to accept the award she so deservedly has earned just so I don’t have to listen, watch or read anymore uneducated and biased opinions on something they truly have no idea about.

    Like

      • I think if there’s ever a quote that typifies my feelings about Zero Dark Thirty and Kathryn Bigelow’s work in it then nothing best says it than what writer Mark Bowden (Black Hawk Down and Killing Pablo) said about the film and the controversy surrounding it: “Pure storytelling is not always about making an argument, no matter how worthy. It can be simply about telling the truth.”

        Like

  2. Pingback: LeonTh3Duke’s Favorite Films of 2012 | Through the Shattered Lens

  3. Pingback: The Best Picture Race In Review: The 2010s | Through the Shattered Lens

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.