Quickie Review: Masters of Horror – Cigarette Burns (dir. by John Carpenter)


Cigarette Burns was John Carpenter’s episodic contribution to the Showtime series, Masters of Horror. This 13-episode horror anthology thought up by Mick Garris (a fellow horror director best known for adapting Stephen King stories) which includes eleven other directors known for their work in the horror genre.

John Carpenter works off of a screenplay that posits an interesting premise about an infamous film that caused the audience it was shown to the first time to go homicidal. The story itself involves a man known in the film community as someone who can find and hunt down any copy of film no matter how rare. Norman Reedus (he of Blade II, The Boondock Saints) plays the cinephile who takes on the job to hunt down a copy of this infamous film titled Le Fin Absolue Du Monde. His client was played with relish by resident weirdo Udo Kier. Really, Kier could be given any role and he’ll add his brand of idiosyncracy and weirdness to the part. In Cigarette Burns he plays an obsessive fan of the rare film to the hilt. His contribution to the the climactic ending will bring a smile to gorehounds everywhere. Alas, it’s Kier’s performance that’s the highlight of the acting in Cigarette Burns. Reedus’ performance as Kirby Sweetman the cinephile leaves much to be desired. The screenplay itself was already average, but with genuine ideas that could be explored if the acting could raise it beyond its C-grade pedigree, but Reedus wasn’t up to it.

Carpenter’s directing really can’t be faulted for the major flaws in the screenplay and in his lead’s performance. It’s not early Carpenter, but his work in Cigarette Burns was much better than what he’s done in his last couple films. In fact, this tv show entry in Carpenter’s body of work resembles one of his more underrated films. I am talking about his ode to Stephen King and H.P. Lovecraft with In the Mouth of Madness. Instead of a book influencing the sanity of the reader, its a film that does it instead. A film that may or may not have divine origins that doesn’t just turn its viewers homicidal but bend their sense of reality.

I think with a better cast and a screenplay that’s worked on a bit more by its writers, Cigarette Burns could’ve been a great episode in the Masters of Horror anthology or, better yet, become a full-fledged feature film. Instead, it’s just a very good work from Carpenter with great gore sequences (courtesy of KNB EFX), but brought low due to a very rough screenplay and a lead actor in Norman Reedus who seemed stoned, drunk or both throughout his entire performance. It’s not something great, but a good showing from Carpenter that said he’s not as washed-up as many seem to be calling him.

6 responses to “Quickie Review: Masters of Horror – Cigarette Burns (dir. by John Carpenter)

  1. I also felt that this episode played like an inferior variation on “In The Mouth Of Madness”, a film I like very much. I’ve seen as many of the Masters Of Horror episodes as I could track down. This one seemed about average in quality.

    While I love the concept, most of the episodes I’ve seen haven/t been all that great. I did find “Haeckel’s Tale” subsequent to your review. I liked that one quite a bit, for a number of reasons. But most episodes remind me of those from “Tales From The Crypt”, which I found to be a largely mediocre series. This is disappointing, given the caliber of the directors involved (in MOH).

    I will say this for the Masters Of Horror series – it had some of the goriest stuff I have ever seen, and I’ve seen some stuff.

    Which episodes from the series have you liked the most?

    Like

  2. OK. I’ve seen all of them except “The Screwfly Solution”, which I will look for.

    I liked the other three, as well. I found “Jenifer” to be an interesting story. There was no explanation for this weird girl, which somehow makes the story more effective. I also found it interesting that Steven Weber wrote the teleplay.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.