Horror Film Review: The Vampire Bat (dir by Frank R. Strayer)


In 1933’s The Vampire Bat, people are dying in a small German village, victims of blood loss.  A woman named Martha Mueller (Rita Carlisle) was recently attacked by a bat, leading to rumors of a vampire.  When the local town eccentric, a twitchy man named Hermann Glieb (Dwight Frye), argues that bats are actually harmless and admits that he likes bats because they are “soft” and “nice,” people start to suspect that he might be the vampire.  Another man named Kringen (George E. Stone) claims that he was attacked by a vampire and insinuates that it was Glieb.  Glieb may seems like a strange man who likes to collect bats but could he be something even more sinister?

Two town leaders have opposite feelings about the claim that a vampire is attacking the town.  Karl Brettschneider (Melvyn Douglas) is the local police inspector and he deals with facts.  He doesn’t believe in superstition and he initially scoffs at the idea that a vampire is attacking the village.  Meanwhile, Dr. Otto von Niemann (Lionel Atwill) is the town’s doctor.  He’s been treating the victims of the bat attacks and he’s even be letting some of his patients live at his home.  Everyone knows that Dr. von Neimann is a kindly man of science.  Karl is even dating Ruth (Fay Wray), one of Otto’s boarders.  But is the doctor as benevolent as everyone assumes?

When answering that question, consider these four facts:

  1.  Dr. von Neimann is the one who encouraged Kringen to spread stories about a vampire haunting the town, despite the fact that Kringen himself said that he didn’t want to start a panic.
  2. Dr. van Niemann is played by Lionel Atwill.
  3. Glieb is played by Dwight Frye.
  4. Karl is played by Melvyn Douglas.

Indeed, for horror fans, the casting of Lionel Atwill gives the game away.  Lionel Atwill appeared in a number of horror films and it was rare that he wasn’t cast as the villain.  (One of his non-villainous role was as the one-armed Inspector Krogh in The Son of Frankenstein.)  From the minute the viewer sees Atwill, he seem to give off sinister vibes and it’s not really a surprise when he turns out to be less than trustworthy.

As for Dwight Frye, horror fans love him for playing a number of unhinged weirdos, like Renfield in the Lugosi-version of Dracula and the torch-bearing servant in Karloff’s Frankenstein.  Frye was good at playing twitchy types but one thing that all of Frye’s characters had in common is that they were pretty much destined to be victims.  Even when Frye played an unlikeable character,  like in Frankenstein, it was obvious that he was going to end up getting killed at the hands of the Monster.

Finally, Melvyn Douglas was the epitome of propriety in every film in which he appeared.  If Douglas thinks that there is something more going on than just a vampire attacking people, there probably is.  And since we know Douglas can’t be the main bad guy, that pretty much just leaves Lionel Atwill.

The Vampire Bat is a short and enjoyable B-movie that puts an interesting spin on the typical vampire legend.  Though the budget may be low, the cast of Atwill, Douglas, Frye, and Wray can’t be beat and all of them give fully committed performances.  Dwight Frye, in particular, gives one of his best performance as the unfortunate Glieb.  As always, Lionel Atwill makes for an entertaining villain.  At its best, The Vampire Bat comments on the power of hysteria.  Convinced that there is a vampire in their midst, the town goes mad and it directs its anger towards those who are seen as being on the outside, men like Glieb.

The Vampire Bat is more than worthy of your Halloween viewing.

The Trail Beyond (1934, directed by Robert N. Bradbury)


Falsely accused of murder, Rod Drew (John Wayne) and his buddy Wabi (Noah Beery, Jr.) jump off a train and end up in the Canadian wilderness, where they eventually find a deserted cabin, a map to a gold mine, and plenty of trouble when French-Canadian outlaw Jules LaRocque (Robert Frazer) decides that he wants the map and kidnaps Wabi’s girlfriend, Felice (Verna Hillie), to get it.

This was one of the many B-westerns that John Wayne made in between 1930’s The Big Trail and 1939’s Stagecoach.  The film finds the youngish Wayne playing a slightly less upright character than usual.  He’s still the hero but he’s also wanted by the police and spends much of the film fleeing from them.  The movie is only 55 minutes long and the action moves quickly.  The film’s Canadian locations and Robert Frazer’s over-the-top villain gives The Trail Beyond a slightly different and quirkier flavor than most the Duke’s 1930s output.  I think this might be the only film to feature Wayne working with the Mounties.  Even in this low-budget production, John Wayne is a strong hero who just looks like he belongs on a horse and traveling across the frontier.  For someone who was the president of his high school’s Latin Club., Wayne had an automatic authenticity when it came to playing cowboys, even in the years before Stagecoach made him one of the biggest stars in the world.  This is also one of the few films to feature both Noah Beery Sr. and Noah Beery Jr.  While Beery Jr. plays Wayne’s sidekick and is in the film almost as much as John, Berry Sr.’s role is much smaller.  He’s the store owner who is also Felice’s father.

Obviously, this is a film for fans of the genre only but it’s a good example of how John Wayne could make even his Poverty Row productions entertaining and watchable.

Embracing the Melodrama Part II #8: Gambling With Souls (dir by Elmer Clifton)


Gambling_with_Souls_FilmPosterThere’s been a murder!

During a raid on a club that doubles as both a brothel and gambling hall, the police discover the dead body of gambler Lucky Wilder.  Standing over him with a gun is Mae Miller (Martha Chapin), the wife of respected Dr. John Miller (Robert Frazer).  Dragged in front of the District Attorney (Edward Keane, sporting a mustache that was probably meant to make him look like real-life New York D.A. Thomas Dewey), Mae is given a chance to explain herself.

And that’s what Mae does, revealing how she was just an innocent housewife who was dragged into a life of gambling and sin by Wilder (Wheeler Oakman) and Molly (Vera Steadman).  After being fooled into thinking that she’s a good gambler, Mae finds herself in debt to Wilder and is blackmailed into working in Wilder’s brothel.  However, when Mae realizes that Wilder and Molly are trying the same con on a new girl, she’s left with little choice but to take the law into her own hands…

Released in 1936, Gambling With Souls is — much like Damaged Lives — an exploitation film disguised as an educational film.  That’s why the district attorney is there to let us know that Mae’s story is not an unusual one and that all decisions have consequences.  “Don’t gamble and resent your husband for not making enough money!” the film shouts at us, “BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT WILL HAPPEN!”

And really, that’s the fun of Gambling With Souls.  It’s just so histrionic and over-the-top and, ultimately, it’s so shameless that you can’t help but enjoy it.  If they ever remake Gambling With Souls, I want to play Mae because not only does she get to shoot the bad guy but she also gets to wear a lot of pretty clothes and look good while doing it.  Other than being a prostitute and a gambling addict, Mae could be a role model for us all.

Plus, this is one of those old films that’s full of stock footage!  That means that whenever we watch one of the shows at Lucky’s club, we’re actually watching footage that was shot for several other movies.  These scenes are so haphazardly and awkwardly inserted into the main film that I actually made a game out of trying to predict when the next one would suddenly pop up.  On the one hand, all of that stock footage means that the look of both the club’s stage and the club’s performers change from scene to scene.  However, on the other (and far more positive) hand, it also means that there’s a lot of dancing!

Gambling With Souls is a lot of fun and guess what?  It’s in the public domain!  Watch it below!