Lisa Marie Reviews An Oscar Winner: Nomadland (dir by Chloe Zhao)

Posted on January 19, 2025 by Lisa Marie Bowman

In 2020’s Nomadland, Frances McDormand stars as Fern.

Fern had a job working in an U.S. Gypsum plant in Nevada but, after years of steady employment, she’s laid off. Recently widowed and struggling to pay the bills, Fern sells almost everything that she owns and moves into a van. She travels across the country, taking work where she can find it and hanging out at other camps with self-styled “nomads.” She meets Bob Wells, the real-life guru of the van-dwelling, nomad lifestyle. She forms cautious friendships with other people who have decided to spend their lives in their vans, traveling from one location to another. Some of them are people who have fallen on hard times. Some of them are just people who don’t want to be tied down. One thing that becomes clear about Fern is that, while she’s a kind and caring soul, she’s also not one to allow people to get too close to her. She values her independence.

The film becomes a portrait of people who have been largely forgotten by conventional society but who have created a society of their own. (Fern may occasionally work at an Amazon warehouse but one gets the feeling that she would never order anything from there herself.) The film centers on Frances McDormand’s performance as Fern but most of the people that she meets are played by actual nomads. Director Chloe Zhao directs in documentary fashion, emphasizing the natural beauty of America and the lined but strong faces of people who are determined to live life their own way.

Nomadland can seem like a curious best picture winner. It’s almost plotless and, at time, the film itself can seem a bit heavy-handed in its portrayal of the nomad lifestyle. (I value my independence but I doubt that I could handle living in a van. And, even if I could handle it, I wouldn’t want to.) Even though it’s only been a few years since Nomadland won its Oscar, it sometimes seems as if it’s become one of the forgotten Best Picture winners. Some of that is because Nomadland won during the COVID pandemic, at a time when the release a lot of the films that were expected to be big Oscar contenders (like West Side Story and Top Gun: Maverick) were moved back so they could be released in theaters. While Nomadland did get a limited theatrical release, most people who watched it did so on Hulu. The 2020 Best Picture nominees were films that probably would not have been nominated in a different year and Nomadland, with its cinema verité style, is far more lowkey than the typical dramatic Oscar winner. Fairly or not, the film’s reputation has also suffered due to the failure of director Chloe Zhao’s The Eternals. Nomadland is perhaps now best known as being a part of a cautionary tale about what happens when a director makes an acclaimed film and then gets hired to do a Marvel movie.

(You have to feel bad for Chloe Zhao, who was the second woman to win the Oscar for Best Director but who was given the award as a part of perhaps the worst ceremony in the history of the Oscars. So determined were the producers to end on the triumphant note of Chadwick Boseman receiving a posthumous Oscar that both Zhao and Nomadland‘s victories were treated as distractions. And then, of course, Boseman didn’t even win the Oscar. It was an awkward night all around.)

That said, I can understand why Nomadland was embraced when it was released. It came out at a time when people were not only scared of getting COVID but also having to deal with the government’s heavy-handed approach to dealing with the pandemic. Living off the grid and away from society was something that looked very attractive to a lot of people back then. Future film students may be confused as to why Nomadland was so honored but it was definitely a film of its time. People forget (or willfully choose to ignore) how crazy things felt during the pandemic. When Fran told the world to leave her alone, she spoke for many.

VOYAGE (1993) – Rutger Hauer and Eric Roberts battle it out on a boat!

Posted on January 19, 2025 by Bradley Crain

The 1993 made-for-cable television film VOYAGE opens with Morgan Norvell (Rutger Hauer) and his wife Kit (Karen Allen) headed to their 20-year class reunion. Morgan didn’t really want to go, but Kit talked him into it. It seems that Morgan was a champion diver back in high school. We know that because he’s looking at some pictures at the reunion that are meant to illustrate what a great athlete he once was. I say “meant to illustrate” because the man in the pictures looks absolutely nothing like a potentially younger Hauer would. Hauer is a big boned man, known for his blond hair. This guy in the pictures is scrawny with dark hair, but I’ll just move on, I guess. Morgan and Kit seem to be enjoying themselves, when they run into Kit’s old friend Gil Freeland (Eric Roberts) and his wife Ronnie (Connie Nielsen). It’s kind of awkward at first because Gil asks Morgan if he remembers him, and Morgan doesn’t, even though they were in the same class. Isn’t that the worst? I was recently at an Arkansas Razorbacks football game, and as I walked away from the concession area with my beverage, this lady’s voice said, “Well, if it isn’t Brad Crain.” I looked at the group of people standing in front of me, including the lady who said my name, and I immediately knew I was in trouble. They all looked kind of familiar, but a long time ago “kind of familiar,” and I knew none of their names. And then she asked that question I was hoping to avoid, “You don’t remember me, do you?” I had to admit I didn’t. We spoke for a few moments, and then I headed to my seat feeling a little embarrassed. I told my family about the exchange a few days later, and my sister Pam said that the lady was her best friend in school and that she used to spend the night at our house when we were kids. But the truth is that I still don’t really remember her, and now I’m starting to worry about how the hell I can’t remember her!

After that initially awkward moment, Morgan, Kit, Gil and Ronnie sit down together and start talking about their lives. We learn that Morgan is an architect (ala Paul Kersey), that Kit is an author, that Gil is a dentist, and that Ronnie just looks good. If she told her profession, I missed it. In a case of giving way too much information to people you haven’t seen in 20 years, Morgan and Kit tell the couple of their plans to go to Monte Carlo where they have a sailboat, which they plan to sail down the coast of Italy until they reach Malta. It seems that they purchased a hotel that is in much need of repair, and that they are going to live on the boat for a year, while Morgan puts his architect skills to good use and restores the property. The couple, who have had their share of struggles, are using this adventure as a fresh start in their marriage. Well Gil and Ronnie think this all sounds like a ball and even say that they’d love to join them for a few days if they could. No specific plans are discussed, and Morgan and Kit say that would be great, without expecting they’ll see them again after this night. Wrong! While Morgan is getting the boat ready in Monte Carlo, Gil and Ronnie show up. They have a good day on the ocean together and are enjoying some champagne that night when Gil proceeds to invite himself and Ronnie to go along with them on down the coast for a few days. She doesn’t want to be rude, but Kit is not for this idea so she kicks Morgan under the table. This is supposed to be their time to work on their relationship. Morgan should have known better than to say that Kit and Ronnie could join them for a few days, because any person who’s married or in a relationship should understand the under the table “kick to the shin.” But in a complete dumbass move, he invited them along anyway.

And this is where things really start going in a different direction. That first night, Ronnie makes a sexual move on Morgan, which he somehow has the strength to turn down, while Gil and Kit are downstairs reliving old times… Strike 1! That same night, Morgan is awakened to the sounds of a person on the deck and finds Gil up there. Gil says he was needing some fresh air and dropped his champagne, but Morgan finds the fuel cap is loose after Gil goes back downstairs… Strike 2! A couple of days later, Ronnie tries to kiss Kit, Gil catches a fish and bashes its head in instead of just throwing it back and then has the nerve to imply to Morgan that he had sex with Kit in high school… Strikes 3, 4, and 5! Morgan knocks the crap out of Gil and then makes them get off the boat when they get back to shore that day.

And from that point forward, Morgan and Kit sail on down the coast of Italy, making their way to Malta where they rebuild both their relationship and the Hotel Riviera, and live happily ever after! I’m just kidding, the rest of the movie consists of Gil and Ronnie terrorizing the couple, ultimately wanting to kill them for far more nefarious purposes than I’ll reveal here. I believe that most people in the world will fit into 2 categories: those who want to watch a movie where Eric Roberts terrorizes and tries to kill Rutger Hauer, and those who don’t want to watch such a movie. I’m really writing this up for those in the first camp, so I don’t want to spoil this movies surprises!

Back in 1993, Rutger Hauer’s run as a big-screen lead was nearing its end. With a couple exceptions, he would spend the rest of the decade appearing in made-for-cable TV films and other low budget direct-to-video type fare. Eric Roberts, who had received an Oscar nomination a decade earlier, was also mostly doing low budget direct-to-video fare, TV movies, and the occasional character part in a larger budget movie. This is an interesting time for both actors as their careers were transitioning. But we’re talking about two guys who know how to act, as evidenced by Hauer’s 174 acting credits on IMDB and Roberts’ 760 acting credits on IMDB (and counting as he has 4 credits in 2025 already). Both Hauer and Roberts are capable of playing complete psychos, so I’m not sure how they settled in on Roberts to play the psycho in this one. It may be because Hauer played a psycho stalker in his earlier movie from 1993, the made-for-HBO film BLIND SIDE, but that’s just a guess.

I enjoyed VOYAGE when I watched it the night of its premiere on the USA Network on June 2^nd, 1993, and I enjoyed it when I watched it again this morning. I’m a huge fan of Rutger Hauer, and I’ve always appreciated Eric Roberts. For me, it’s a real treat seeing these two guys face off. I enjoy that Hauer gets to play the “hero” while Roberts is the dangerous creep, and Roberts is as creepy as it gets in this movie. Hauer’s role isn’t very flashy, as he’s a pretty normal guy who finds himself in a bad situation, but he is Rutger Hauer so it’s not a surprise that he’s able to summon the strength to fight for his and his wife’s lives. VOYAGE was directed by John Mackenzie. Mackenzie made some good films earlier in his career, including the phenomenal British crime film THE LONG GOOD FRIDAY (1980), the Charles Bronson corrupt union drama ACT OF VENGEANCE (1986), and the Michael Caine / Pierce Brosnan spy thriller THE FOURTH PROTOCOL (1987). While VOYAGE is certainly not his most accomplished work, Mackenzie knows how to make a film, and he does a fine job here. And finally, I always enjoy a movie filmed in beautiful locations, and Malta definitely makes for some beautiful views.

Ultimately, I think your enjoyment of VOYAGE will come down to whether or not you like the idea of Rutger Hauer and Eric Roberts fighting it out to the death. I personally like that idea.

See the trailer for VOYAGE below:

Film Review: Eraserhead (dir by David Lynch)

Posted on January 19, 2025 by Lisa Marie Bowman

Jack Nance in David Lynch’s Eraserhead

I’ve been thinking about Eraserhead ever since I first heard the news about David Lynch’s passing.

Filmed in harsh but beautiful black-and-white and first released in 1977 (after a production period that lasted for seven years), Eraserhead tells the story of Henry Spencer (Jack Nance), an awkward young man who has the haircut that gives the film it’s name and who wanders through the film like an alienated character in a Kafka story. He lives in an industrial landscape and almost every scene seems to have the sound of machinery droning away in the background. He lives in an dark apartment and it appears that there’s a woman living in a radiator who sings that, “In heaven, everything is fine,” while stomping on sperm creatures. Occasionally, a mysterious woman in the hallway talks to him. Henry doesn’t seem to have a job or any sort of interests. He doesn’t really have much of a personality. Jack Nance, who would go on to become a member of David Lynch’s regular ensemble, has a permanently dazed expression on his face. It’s hard not to feel sorry for Henry, even if he isn’t quite sympathetic. In Heaven, everything is fine but in Henry’s world, it’s much different.

Henry has a girlfriend named Mary X (Charlotte Stewart). Mary lives with her parents in an apartment near the train tracks. When Henry goes over to her place for dinner, her father shows off how he can’t feel anything in his arm. Eating a piece of chicken becomes awkward when it appears to be alive and bleeding. Mary seems to have some sort of seizure. Mary’s mother informs Henry that Mary has had a mutant baby and Henry must take care of it. The baby (represented by a grotesque puppet) has no arms or legs or, it would appear, skin. It cries constantly, despite Henry’s attempts to care for it. The baby is the only truly sympathetic character in the film.

Eraserhead is often described as being a film that’s difficult to understand but, by Lynch standards, it’s not that hard to figure out. Lynch himself said that the film was fueled by his own anxiety over being a father and, throughout the film, Henry tries to take care of the baby but everything he does just makes things worse. As is often the case with Lynch’s film, many viewers get caught up in wondering why when they should just be paying attention to what happens. Why is the baby a mutant? Because it is. Why does Henry live in the middle of an industrial park? Because he does. Who is the scarred man who appears at the start of the film and who apparently pushes the levers that lead to Mary’s pregnancy? Again, it’s less important who he is and more important that he’s there and now, Henry is a father despite being woefully unprepared. Even if the viewer learned the scarred man’s identity (or if Henry even learned of his existence), it wouldn’t change Henry’s situation. (Technically, of course, the man is Sissy Spacek’s husband and frequent Lynch collaborator, Jack Fisk.) Eraserhead is a visually surreal film but it’s also an very emotionally honest one. Henry may be stuck in, as Lynch once put it, a “dream of dark and disturbing things,” but his fears and his anxiety are portrayed realistically That emotional honesty is something that would appear in all of Lynch’s work and it’s why he was one of our most important filmmakers.

Sadly, David Lynch is now gone. So is Jack Nance. But their work will live on forever.

Eraserhead (1977, dir by David Lynch, DP: Frederick Elmes, Herbert Cardwell)

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special Edgar Allan Poe Edition

Posted on January 19, 2025 by Lisa Marie Bowman

by Debbie Hughes

4 (or more) Shots From 4 (or more) Films is just what it says it is, 4 (or more) shots from 4 (or more) of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 (or more) Shots From 4 (or more) Films lets the visuals do the talking.

216 years ago today, Edgar Allan Poe was born in Boston, Massachusetts. From his humble beginnings as the son of two struggling actors, Poe would go on to become one of the first great American writers. (It’s been said that, when Charles Dickens first traveled to the United States in 1842, he specifically wanted to meet Edgar Allan Poe. Unfortunately, it appears that popular story my not be true but it’s still a good story.) Poe was controversial in life and even his death generated more questions than answers but no one can deny his strength as a poet and as a prose writer. Both the detective and the horror genres owe a huge debt to Edgar Allan Poe.

Today, in honor of Edgar Allan Poe’s legacy, TSL presents 4 shots from 4 films that were inspired by the work of Edgar Allan Poe!

4 Shots From 4 Films

The Fall of the House of Usher (1960, dir by Roger Corman, DP: Floyd Crosby)

The Raven (1963, dir by Roger Corman, DP: Floyd Crosby)

The Masque of the Red Death (1964, dir by Roger Corman, DP: Nicolas Roeg)

The Pit and the Pendulum (1990, dir by Stuart Gordon, DP: Adolfo Bartoli)

Lisa Marie Review An Oscar Nominee: The Bishop’s Wife (dir by Henry Koster)

Posted on January 18, 2025 by Lisa Marie Bowman

In 1947’s The Bishop’s Wife, Cary Grant stars as Dudley.

We first see Dudley walking down the snow-covered streets of a city that is preparing for Christmas. He watches Julia Broughman (Loretta Young), the wife of the local Anglican bishop. He stops to talk to Prof. Wutheridge (Monty Woolly), a secular humanist who is close to Julia and her husband, despite being irreligious himself. Dudley seems to know all about the professor, even though the professor is not sure who he is. The professor mentions that he was fired from a university because he was considered to be a “radical,” even though he has no interest in politics. The professor says that the town’s church has seen better days, especially since the Bishop is more interested in raising money from the rich to build a grand new cathedral than actually meeting with the poor who need help.

The last person that Dudley visits is Bishop Henry Broughman (David Niven). Dudley reveals to Henry that he’s angel and that he’s come in response to Henry’s prayers. Henry has been frustrated in his attempts to raise money for a new cathedral. Dudley has come to provide guidance.

With only the Bishop knowing the truth about Dudley, Dudley becomes a houseguest of the Broughmans. The Bishop has become so obsessed with his new cathedral that he’s not only been neglecting his diocese but also his family. While Dudley tries to show Henry what’s really important, he also helps Julia and her daughter Debby (Karolyn Grimes) to fit in with the neighborhood. (Bobby Anderson, who played the young George Bailey in It’s A Wonderful Life, makes an appearance as a boy having a snowball fight who says that Debby can’t play because no one wants to risk hitting a bishop’s daughter with a snowball.) The Bishop becomes jealous of Dudley and perhaps he should be as Dudley finds himself falling in love with Julia and considering not moving on to his next assignment.

(And now we know where Highway to Heaven got the inspiration for 75% of its episodes….)

The Bishop’s Wife is an enjoyable film, one that is full of not just Christmas imagery but also the Christmas spirit as well. The Bishop finally realizes that his planned cathedral is more of a gift to his ego than to the men and women who look to him for guidance and comfort in difficult times. David Niven is, as always, likable even when his character is acting like a jerk. That said, this is pretty much Cary Grant’s show from the start. Suave, charming, and gently humorous, Grant joins Claude Rains and Henry Travers in the ranks of great cinematic angels. Never mind that Grant’s character is a bit pushy and has his own crisis of faith. From the minute that Grant appears, we know that he’ll know exactly the right way to answer Henry’s prayers.

Cary Grant was not nominated for Best Actor for his performance here. Undoubtedly, this was another case of Grant making it all look so easy that the Academy failed to realize just how good of a performance he gave. Interestingly enough, The Bishop’s Wife was one of two Christmas films nominated for Best Picture that year, along with Miracle on 34th Street. Both films lost to Gentleman’s Agreement.

Live Tweet Alert: Watch Mortuary With #ScarySocial!

Posted on January 18, 2025 by Lisa Marie Bowman

As some of our regular readers undoubtedly know, I am involved in a few weekly live tweets on twitter. I host #FridayNightFlix every Friday, I co-host #ScarySocial on Saturday, and I am one of the five hosts of #MondayActionMovie! Every week, we get together. We watch a movie. We tweet our way through it.

Tonight, for #ScarySocial, I will be hosting 1982’s Mortuary, starring Bill Paxton!

If you want to join us on Saturday night, just hop onto twitter, start the film at 9 pm et, and use the #ScarySocial hashtag! The film is available on Prime and Tubi! I’ll be there co-hosting and I imagine some other members of the TSL Crew will be there as well. It’s a friendly group and welcoming of newcomers so don’t be shy!

Scene That I Love: Dueling Banjos from John Boorman’s Deliverance

Posted on January 18, 2025 by Lisa Marie Bowman

Diliverance (1972,dir by John Boorman, DP: Vilmos Zsigmond)

Today’s scene that I love comes from John Boorman’s 1972 film, Deliverance. For the longest time, I thought that this scene was improvised and the kid with the banjo just happened to be hanging out around the set. That makes for a nice story but I have recently read that this scene was actually scripted and the kid, while a local, was hired ahead-of-time to show up and play the banjo.

From Deliverance, here are the Dueling Banjos!

8 Shots From 8 Films: Special John Boorman Edition

Posted on January 18, 2025 by Lisa Marie Bowman

Today, the Shattered Lens wishes a happy 92nd birthday to British director John Boorman.

Boorman is one of those great director who sometimes doesn’t seem to get as much credit as he deserves. An undeniably idiosyncratic director, Boorman easily moved from genre to genre and who brought his own individual style to each of his films. Sometimes, critics and audiences responded to that vision and sometimes, they didn’t. And yet even Boorman’s so-called failures have come to be appreciated over the years. Zardoz is a cult classic. Even The Exorcist II: The Heretic is not quite the disaster that some insist. If nothing else, it’s one of the strangest studio productions to ever be released.

At his best, Boorman is one of the most influential directors of all time. How many neo-noirs have ripped off the look and the feel of Point Blank? The ending of Deliverance has been imitated by a countless number of horror films and, indeed, every backwoods thriller owes a debt to Boorman’s film about four businessmen spending a weekend canoeing. Excalibur is one of the most elegiac of all the Arthurian films while Hope and Glory retains its power to make audiences both laugh and cry with its portrayal of life on the British homefront during World War II. Meanwhile, films like The General and The Emerald Forest gave underrated characters actors like Powers Boothe and Brendan Gleeson a chance to shine.

So today, in honor of the career and the legacy of John Boorman, here are….

8 Shots from 8 John Boorman Films

Point Blank (1967, directed by John Boorman, DP: Philip H. Lathrop)

Deliverance (1972, directed by John Boorman, DP: Vilmos Zsigmond)

Zardoz (1974, directed by John Boorman, DP: Geoffrey Unsworth)

The Exorcist II: The Heretic (1977, dir by John Boorman, DP: William A. Fraker)

Excalibur (1981, dir by John Boorman, DP: Alex Thomson)

The Emerald Forest (1985, dir by John Boorman. DP: Philippe Rousselot)

Hope and Glory (1987, dir by John Boorman, DP: Philippe Rousselot)

The General (1998, dir by John Boorman, DP: Seamus Deasy)

Film Review: Notorious (dir by Alfred Hitchcock)

Posted on January 18, 2025 by Lisa Marie Bowman

Today is the 121st birthday of one of the great actors of Hollywood’s Golden Age, the one and only Cary Grant. For those of us who love to watch older films, Grant is usually the epitome of old-fashioned movie star charisma. He was an actor who could do it all, from screwball comedy to tear-jerking melodrama to exciting thrillers. What one usually hears about Cary Grant is that he was an actor who was taken for granted because he made everything seem so effortless.

And yet, there was a darkness to Grant’s best performances. Like Jimmy Stewart, he was an actor whose affable screen presence often hinted at inner turmoil. And, much as in the case of Stewart, Alfred Hitchcock was a director who immediately understood that. He cast Grant in some of his best films, usually playing a character with a secret or two to hide. One of my favorite “darker” Grant performances and films is 1946’s Notorious.

Directed by Alfred Hitchcock, Notorious opens with T.R. Devlin (Cary Grant) meeting and, it is implied, seducing Alicia Huberman (Ingrid Bergman). Alicia, at the time, was attempting to drink away her sorrow over her father being convicted of treason for his pro-Nazi activities during World War II. As the daughter of an American Nazi with a reputation for drinking too much and being promiscuous, Alicia is indeed notorious. That’s something that Devlin uses to his advantage the next morning when he informs that hangover Alicia that he is an American intelligence agent and that he is investigating the activities of a group of Nazi sympathizers who fled to South America at the end of the war. He wants Alicia, as the daughter of a known sympathizer, to infiltrate their operations.

Reluctantly, Alicia agrees and, while they wait for to learn the exact details of her assignment, they fall in love. Devlin is not happy when his superiors inform him that they want Alicia to approach and seduce Alex Sebastian (Claude Rains), a friend of her father’s who now lives in Brazil with his domineering mother (Leopoldine Konstantin). Alicia is even less happy when Devlin tells her of the assignment, especially as she knows that the weak-willed Sebastian has always been in love with her. She assumes that Devlin only pretended to love her.

After Devlin arranges for Alicia to be at the local riding club at the same time as Alex, Alex meets her and immediately brings her to the mansion that he shares with his mother. Alex is an interesting character. When we first meet him, he hardly seems like a Nazi sympathizer. His happiness when he sees Alicia and the apparent sincerity of his love for her stands in contrast to the often cold, manipulative, and harsh Devlin. Sebastian invites Alicia to move into his mansion and soon, Alicia tells Devlin that he can add Sebastian to “my list of playmates.” When Sebastian asks Alicia to marry him, Devlin tells Alicia to do what she wants. Alicia married Sebastian though she loves Devlin but she soon discovers just how for Sebastian and his mother will go to protect themselves and their Nazi conspirators.

Notorious is famous for its 2 and a half kissing scene between Devlin and Alicia, filmed at a time when the production code specifically stated that kisses could only last for three seconds. Hitchcock handled this by interrupting the kiss every three seconds and then having his two stars get back to it. Both Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman said the scene was awkward to shoot, specifically because they had to keep finding reasons to split apart without splitting too far apart but the effect onscreen is amazingly romantic and probably about as erotic as 1940s studio production could be. In that scene, you have no doubt that Devlin and Alicia share a passion that Alex, even though he is in love with Alicia, could never understand. Grant and Bergman have an amazing chemistry in this scene and really the entire film.

As played by Cary Grant, Devlin is not always likable in Notorious. He can be cold and manipulative and judgmental but, in the end, we never doubt his love for Alicia. Alex also loves Alicia but he ultimately puts himself (and his mother) first. As for Alicia, she is someone who has been unfairly branded by both the activities of her father and her past reputation and anyone who has ever come to work or gone to school on a Monday morning and heard the snickering that goes along with the rumors about what she did during the weekend will immediately relate to Alicia. Alicia is told that the mission is a way to redeem herself but the film suggests that no redemption is necessary. If anything, it’s Devlin who needs to redeem himself for the way he previously manipulated and judged her. Devlin and his superiors are trying to stop a group of Nazi sympathizers from graining power in South America and their mission is an important one. (That sentiment would be even more true from audience watching in 1946, just a year after the end of World War II). But the important of their mission doesn’t change the fact that the people involved are human beings with very real and very fragile emotions.

Notorious features some of Hitchcock’s best set pieces, from the famous kissing scene to another scene involving the key to a wine cellar. Grant, Bergman, and Rains give three of their best performances in this intelligent thriller. (Watching, one can see why Ian Fleming suggested Cary Grant as a possible James Bond.) I first saw Notorious in a film class in college. At first, the class was a bit hesitant about a black-and-white movie from 1946 but, by the end, there were cheers as Devlin rushed to save Alicia. Notorious is a timeless classic.

Notorious (1946, dir by Alfred Hitchcock, DP: Ted Tetzlaff)

THE UNTOUCHABLES (1987) – Happy 70th Birthday, Kevin Costner!

Posted on January 18, 2025 by Bradley Crain

There was a time in my life, before I could drive, when I would beg my parents to stop at the video store every time we went to the neighboring town of Conway, Arkansas. The town I grew up in was too small to have more than just a gas station, so this movie buff had to take advantage of every trip to town. One night when we were headed home, my parents relented to my repeated requests, so we stopped off at Budget Video. I wanted to choose all the movies, but unfortunately mom and dad would also let my brother and sister choose movies from time to time as well. On this particular night, my brother wanted to rent THE UNTOUCHABLES (1987). I don’t remember what I was wanting, but I do remember that it was not THE UNTOUCHABLES. I probably pouted a little bit, but we ended up taking THE UNTOUCHABLES home with us. We turned it on that night, and I’ll gladly admit that I was 100% wrong. THE UNTOUCHABLES immediately became one of my favorite films. Great job, bro!

It’s 1930 and Prohibition is the law of the land in the United States of America. Treasury agent Eliot Ness (Kevin Costner) has been given the seemingly impossible task of bringing down notorious gangster Al Capone (Robert De Niro), who supplies booze to nearly all of Chicago. Capone doesn’t just supply the booze, he rules Chicago with an iron fist; and if you’re a local business who doesn’t want to buy his product, he just may blow your ass up! Ness’ job is made especially difficult due to the rampant corruption in Chicago, where everyone from the Mayor, to the judges, lawyers, and law enforcement officers are all on Capone’s payroll, making it pretty much impossible to trust anyone. In a complete stroke of luck, Ness encounters the honest Irish American policeman James Malone (Sean Connery) and asks him to join him in bringing down Capone. With Malone, Ness has found that honest and badass cop who’s not afraid to go up against Capone and his goons. Knowing that most of the police force is already compromised, the two men head to the police academy to try to find another honest cop. This turns out to be another great move as they come upon an Italian American trainee named George Stone (Andy Garcia), who’s a prodigy with a gun. Their last, and greatest move in this humble CPA’s opinion, comes when they accept accountant Oscar Wallace (Charles Martin Smith) to their team. Wallace is convinced that the key to bringing down Capone is trying to build a tax evasion case against him. He’s initially laughed at, but it’s soon apparent that this accountant knows his debits and credits, and his expertise may be just what’s needed to end Capone’s reign of terror once and for all.

I’ve always considered THE UNTOUCHABLES to be a near perfect film. One of the main reasons I find the film so perfect is the direction of Brian De Palma. I’ve been a fan of his “style” for so long, with films like DRESSED TO KILL (1980) and BLOW OUT (1981), but I think he just nails the material here. There are so many great scenes, but the “Union Station” sequence has to be one of the most perfectly choreographed sequences of all time. The building of the tension, the slow-motion shootout when the bad guys arrive, and finally the badass resolution all prove what an absolute master De Palma could be with the right material. De Palma claims that he made up the series of shots as he was filming the scenes at the train station, making the final product that much more impressive. And this all plays out against the background of a “lullaby theme” composed by the legendary Ennio Morricone (THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY). This is what “cinema” is all about.

THE UNTOUCHABLES has an amazing cast of actors to bring its “based on real events” story to life. Kevin Costner was just beginning to emerge as a movie star when this movie was made back in 1987. Especially as a younger actor, Costner was good at projecting both a certain innocence, tempered with the willingness to do what it takes to get the job done once his family and friends are put in danger. And what can you say about actors like Sean Connery and Robert De Niro?!! Connery is so charismatic, wise, and tough as the beat cop who shows Eliot Ness how to beat Capone… ”he sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue!” He’s a beat cop because he’s incorruptible, and Connery projects that stubborn honesty perfectly. I’m so glad that Connery won an Oscar for this performance, as it would be the only time he would ever be nominated for an Academy Award. He’s amazing in this role, even if his accent is Scottish rather than Irish (a notable controversy at the time). Connery may have won the Oscar, but Robert De Niro matches him scene for scene. His ability to make Capone both charismatic and evil in equal measure is an example of what makes De Niro special as an actor. So many actors phone in these types of broad performances, but not De Niro. I also just think it’s cool that De Niro admitted that his performance was heavily influenced by Rod Steiger’s in 1959’s AL CAPONE. I love Steiger and consider this a wonderful tribute. Throw in a young Andy Garcia, the always underrated Charles Martin Smith, and a creepy Billy Drago as Frank Nitti, and you have one of the better casts ever assembled. I especially became a fan of Garcia based on his performance in THE UNTOUCHABLES.

The last person I want to mention is the screenwriter, David Mamet. His screenplay is another perfect element of THE UNTOUCHABLES. The same man who has directed his own films like HOUSE OF GAMES (1987), HOMICIDE (1991), THE SPANISH PRISONER (1997), and SPARTAN (2004) knows how to write a great screenplay. There are so many amazing moments, from the “baseball bat” sequence to the “Stone recruitment” scene, and even Ness’ “he’s in the car” line about Frank Nitti, it’s a muscular screenplay full of big-time moments of audience satisfaction.

At the end of the day, THE UNTOUCHABLES is just a great movie. I still periodically thank my brother for picking it out that fateful day in the late 80’s, and it will always be one of my very favorites. It’s one of those movies that I recommend with zero reservations!

Check out the trailer below, and if you’re smart, you’ll watch one of the great movies of the 1980’s, Brian De Palma’s THE UNTOUCHABLES.