Film Review: Notorious (dir by Alfred Hitchcock)


Today is the 121st birthday of one of the great actors of Hollywood’s Golden Age, the one and only Cary Grant.  For those of us who love to watch older films, Grant is usually the epitome of old-fashioned movie star charisma.  He was an actor who could do it all, from screwball comedy to tear-jerking melodrama to exciting thrillers.  What one usually hears about Cary Grant is that he was an actor who was taken for granted because he made everything seem so effortless.

And yet, there was a darkness to Grant’s best performances.  Like Jimmy Stewart, he was an actor whose affable screen presence often hinted at inner turmoil.  And, much as in the case of Stewart, Alfred Hitchcock was a director who immediately understood that.  He cast Grant in some of his best films, usually playing a character with a secret or two to hide.  One of my favorite “darker” Grant performances and films is 1946’s Notorious.

Directed by Alfred Hitchcock, Notorious opens with T.R. Devlin (Cary Grant) meeting and, it is implied, seducing Alicia Huberman (Ingrid Bergman).  Alicia, at the time, was attempting to drink away her sorrow over her father being convicted of treason for his pro-Nazi activities during World War II.  As the daughter of an American Nazi with a reputation for drinking too much and being promiscuous, Alicia is indeed notorious.  That’s something that Devlin uses to his advantage the next morning when he informs that hangover Alicia that he is an American intelligence agent and that he is investigating the activities of a group of Nazi sympathizers who fled to South America at the end of the war.  He wants Alicia, as the daughter of a known sympathizer, to infiltrate their operations.

Reluctantly, Alicia agrees and, while they wait for to learn the exact details of her assignment, they fall in love.  Devlin is not happy when his superiors inform him that they want Alicia to approach and seduce Alex Sebastian (Claude Rains), a friend of her father’s who now lives in Brazil with his domineering mother (Leopoldine Konstantin).  Alicia is even less happy when Devlin tells her of the assignment, especially as she knows that the weak-willed Sebastian has always been in love with her.  She assumes that Devlin only pretended to love her.

After Devlin arranges for Alicia to be at the local riding club at the same time as Alex, Alex meets her and immediately brings her to the mansion that he shares with his mother.  Alex is an interesting character.  When we first meet him, he hardly seems like a Nazi sympathizer.  His happiness when he sees Alicia and the apparent sincerity of his love for her stands in contrast to the often cold, manipulative, and harsh Devlin.  Sebastian invites Alicia to move into his mansion and soon, Alicia tells Devlin that he can add Sebastian to “my list of playmates.”  When Sebastian asks Alicia to marry him, Devlin tells Alicia to do what she wants.  Alicia married Sebastian though she loves Devlin but she soon discovers just how for Sebastian and his mother will go to protect themselves and their Nazi conspirators.

Notorious is famous for its 2 and a half kissing scene between Devlin and Alicia, filmed at a time when the production code specifically stated that kisses could only last for three seconds.  Hitchcock handled this by interrupting the kiss every three seconds and then having his two stars get back to it.  Both Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman said the scene was awkward to shoot, specifically because they had to keep finding reasons to split apart without splitting too far apart but the effect onscreen is amazingly romantic and probably about as erotic as 1940s studio production could be.  In that scene, you have no doubt that Devlin and Alicia share a passion that Alex, even though he is in love with Alicia, could never understand.  Grant and Bergman have an amazing chemistry in this scene and really the entire film.

As played by Cary Grant, Devlin is not always likable in Notorious.  He can be cold and manipulative and judgmental but, in the end, we never doubt his love for Alicia.  Alex also loves Alicia but he ultimately puts himself (and his mother) first.  As for Alicia, she is someone who has been unfairly branded by both the activities of her father and her past reputation and anyone who has ever come to work or gone to school on a Monday morning and heard the snickering that goes along with the rumors about what she did during the weekend will immediately relate to Alicia.  Alicia is told that the mission is a way to redeem herself but the film suggests that no redemption is necessary.  If anything, it’s Devlin who needs to redeem himself for the way he previously manipulated and judged her.  Devlin and his superiors are trying to stop a group of Nazi sympathizers from graining power in South America and their mission is an important one.  (That sentiment would be even more true from audience watching in 1946, just a year after the end of World War II).  But the important of their mission doesn’t change the fact that the people involved are human beings with very real and very fragile emotions.

Notorious features some of Hitchcock’s best set pieces, from the famous kissing scene to another scene involving the key to a wine cellar.  Grant, Bergman, and Rains give three of their best performances in this intelligent thriller.  (Watching, one can see why Ian Fleming suggested Cary Grant as a possible James Bond.)  I first saw Notorious in a film class in college.  At first, the class was a bit hesitant about a black-and-white movie from 1946 but, by the end, there were cheers as Devlin rushed to save Alicia.  Notorious is a timeless classic.

Notorious (1946, dir by Alfred Hitchcock, DP: Ted Tetzlaff)

Horror On TV: One Step Beyond Episode 1.4 “The Dark Room” (dir by John Newland)


On tonight’s episode of One Step Beyond, Cloris Leachman plays Rita Wallace, an American photographer in France.  She’s looking for a model whose face will serve as the ultimate symbol of the country.  One day, a haunted-looking man (Marel Dalio) shows up at her apartment.  She thinks he’s a model.  The truth, needless to say, is something quite different….

This episode features good performances from both Leachman and Dalio.  In real life, Dalio was an icon of French cinema and a favorite of Jean Renoir’s.  When the Nazis invaded France, the Jewish Dalio fled Paris and, after a harrowing journey, eventually made it to America.  In America, he played the croupier in Casablanca and appeared in several other films.  Tragically, the rest of his family did not escape and were murdered by the Nazis.  Dalio returned to France after the end of the war and remained an in-demand character actor for several more decades, making his final film appearance in 1980.

The Darkroom originally aired on February 10th, 1959.

Film Review: Barabbas (dir by Richard Fleischer)


Who was Barabbas?

The simple answer to that is that Barabbas was the prisoner who, according to the Gospels, Pontius Pilate released during Passover.  As the story goes, Pilate gave the people the choice.  He could either release Barabbas or Jesus.  For what crime was Barabbas being held?  The Gospel of Matthew merely says that Barabbas was a “notorious prisoner.”  Mark and Luke both write that he was involved in a recent riot and that he was a murderer.  The Gospel of John refers to him as being a bandit, which may have been another term for revolutionary.  Regardless of what crime he had committed, the people overwhelmingly called for Barabbas to be released and for Jesus to be crucified.  What happened to Barabbas after he was set free is not recorded but has been the subject of a good deal of speculation over the centuries.

(Of course, there are some scholars who believe that the Barabbas story was simply an invention of later writers, designed to shift the responsibility for the crucifixion away from the Romans.  There’s also some who say that Jesus and Barabbas were actually the same person and that the inclusion of the Barabbas story was meant to indicate that Jesus was actually a revolutionary who was working to free Judea from Roman role.  I imagine Dan Brown will eventually base a novel on this theory, so look forward to hearing your grandma debating the historicity of Barabbas at some point in the future.)

Back to the original question, who was Barabbas?

According to the 1961 film of the same name, Barabbas was Anthony Quinn.

Based on a novel by the Nobel Prize-winning Swedish author, Pär Lagerkvist, Barabbas opens with Pilate (Anthony Kennedy) making his infamous offer.  Barabbas or Jesus?  Perhaps the only person more shocked than Pilate by the people’s decision is Barabbas himself.  A brutish and violent man, Barabbas is looking forward to returning to his old life but, as he leaves the prison, he finds himself fascinated by the sight of Jesus stoically carrying the cross, heading to the fate that Barabbas was spared.  Later, Barabbas witnesses the Crucifixion and is shaken when, upon Jesus’s death, the sky turns black.

(Director Richard Fleischer shot the Crucifixion during an actual solar eclipse, so that the sky actually did turn black during filming.  It’s a stunning scene.)

For the rest of his life, Barabbas is haunted by both his narrow escape from death and his subsequent notoriety.  When Barabbas tries to reunite with his former lover, Rachel (Silvana Mangano), he discovers that not only does she now want nothing to do with him but that she has also become a follower of Jesus.  (Later, in a surprisingly graphic scene, Rachel is stoned to death.)  Barabbas becomes convinced that he cannot die and he becomes increasingly reckless in his behavior.  Over the next few decades, he finds himself sold into slavery and forced to spend 20 years working in the harsh sulfur mines of Sicily.  He befriends a Christian named Sahak (Vittorio Gassman) and, with him, is trained to be a gladiator by the sadistic Torvald (Jack Palance).  Eventually, Barabbas finds himself rejected by both the Romans and the Christians while Rome burns all around him.

Barabbas is a film that really took me by surprise.  I’ve seen a lot of Biblical and Roman films from the 50s and 60s and I was expecting that Barabbas would be another sumptuously produced but slow-paced epic, one that would inevitably feature stiff dialogue and overly reverential performances.  I mean, don’t me wrong.  I happen to love spectacle and therefore, I enjoy watching most of those old historical and religious epics.  But still, for modern audiences, these films can often seem rather … well, hokey.

But Barabbas was totally different from what I was expecting.  As wonderfully played by Anthony Quinn, Barabbas wanders through most of the film in a state of haunted confusion.  Even at the end of the film, after he’s met St. Peter (Harry Andrews), Barabbas doesn’t seem to fully understand what he believes or how he’s become one of the most notorious men in Rome.  Quinn plays Barabbas almost like a wild animal, one that has been cornered and trapped by his own infamy.  The more Barabbas struggles against his fate, the more trapped he becomes.  Barabbas may be a brute but, the film suggests, even a brute can find some sort of redemption.  Quinn gets good support from the entire supporting cast.  Jack Palance is perfectly evil as Torvald while Vittorio Gassman, Silvana Mangano, and Ernest Borgnine bring some needed nuance to characters who, in lesser hands, could have just been cardboard believers.

Barabbas is a surprisingly dark film.  When Rachel is stoned, the camera doesn’t flinch from showing just how cruel an execution that was.  Nor does the camera flinch from the violent brutality of the gladiatorial games.  When Barabbas is sold into slavery, the sulfur mines of Sicily are depicted in Hellish detail and practically the only thing that saves Barabbas from spending the rest of his life being smothered under a cloud of sulfur is a giggly Roman woman who decides to buy Barabbas so that he can serve as a good luck charm.  The scenes of Barabbas’s skill of a gladiator are contrasted with the bloodthirsty crowd demanding and cheering death.  Even when Barabbas joins the Christians in the Roman catacombs, he discovers that they want nothing to do with him, suggesting that they believe in forgiveness for everyone but him.  The spectacle of Rome is displayed but so is the terror of what lies underneath the city’s ornate surface.  If Barabbas is occasionally a ruthless or unsentimental character, one need only look at the world he lives in to understand why.

With the exception of a few slow scenes at the start of the film, director Richard Fleischer does a good job of keeping the action moving.  It’s a long film but it never becomes a boring one.  In the end, thanks to Quinn’s performance and the film’s unflinching portrayal of life in ancient Rome, Barabbas is a biblical epic for people who usually don’t like biblical epics.

 

Fabulous Forties #32: Outpost in Morocco (dir by Robert Florey)


Otmorpos

After watching the excellent The Last Chance, I was really hoping that the 32nd film in the Fabulous Forties box set would turn out be a classic as well.  Sadly, that was not the case.  1949’s Outpost in Morocco is a generally forgettable adventure film about the French Foreign Legion.

George Raft plays Capt. Paul Gerard, a captain in the French Foreign Legion.  Now, I happen to like George Raft.  He may not have been the greatest actor of Hollywood’s Golden Age but he did have a roguish charm and he was a great dancer.  Unfortunately, while the role of Paul Gerard did call for a bit of charm, it didn’t call for much dancing.  Instead, Paul Gerard is rather stolid and dependable and a little bit boring.  Needless to say, George Raft was more than a little miscast in the role.

Speaking of miscast, the beautiful but very American Marie Windsor plays Cara, the daughter of the Emir of the Moroccan city of Bel-Rashad.  The French are not allowed to enter the city and there are rumors that the Emir has been using this situation as an opportunity to plot against France.  Since Cara has spent the last few years studying in France, she is willing to go into Bel-Rashad and report on whether or not the rumors are true.  Gerard is assigned to escort her to the city.  Gerard’s superiors suspect that Cara might even fall in love with Gerard and, as a result, will be willing to turn against her father.

And that’s exactly what happens!  It takes exactly 10 days for Cara and Gerard to fall in love.  (We know this because the film is full of excerpts from a journal that Gerard keeps as he escorts Cara across the desert.)  However, once they reach Bel-Rashad, Cara does discover that her father is indeed conspiring against the French.  It is up to Gerard to put down the revolution and defeat the Emir, even if it means potentially sacrificing his love for Cara.

It’s interesting to note that there’s a few scenes where Raft sounds like he’s trying to imitate Humphrey Bogart, which immediately reminded me of how so many of Bogart’s great roles were initially offered to Raft.  I found myself wondering if Raft agreed to do Outpost in Morocco to make up for refusing Bogart’s role in a certain other film that was set in Morocco.

Unfortunately, Outpost in Morocco is no Casablanca.  Whereas Casablanca is a classic that holds up to this day, Outpost in Morocco is best described as being … well, dull.

How boring in Outpost in Morocco?  George Raft looks bored.  Marie Windsor looks bored.  Even the great character actor Akim Tamiroff looks bored!  Portions of the film were shot on location in Morocco so there are a few nice shots of the desert (if that’s your thing) and the ending is a bit darker than you might normally expect for a 1949 adventure film but otherwise, Outpost in Morocco is a fairly forgettable film.