October True Crime: D.C. Sniper (dir by Ulli Lommel)


Over a three week period, in 2002, a sniper shot 27 people in Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., killing 17 of them.  For that three week period, the nation lived in fear of an unknown evil that was traveling the highways and killing people seemingly at random.  Even though the murders occurred in the area surrounding our nation’s capitol, there was very much a feeling that the sniper could turn up anywhere and at anytime.  There was a lot of speculation about who the sniper was, with many theorizing that it was Al Quaeda while others argued that the killer was just another home-grown serial killer with a grudge.

When John Allen Muhammad and Lee Malvo were eventually arrested, it turned out that both sides were correct.  Muhammad was an American-bred spree killer, a man who had a grudge against the entire world and who brainwashed a teenage Lee Malvo into serving as his accomplice.  However, Muhammad also turned out to be a terrorist, someone who admired Osama Bin Laden and sympathized with Al Quaeda, even if he never personally had any contact with the group itself.

When Muhammad went on trial for the murders, there was never really any doubt that he would be found guilty and given the death penalty.  There was also little doubt that Ulli Lommel would eventually make a movie about him.

Ulli Lommel was a German director who got his start working with the legendary Rainer Werner Fassbinder.  Lommel starred in several of Fassbinder’s early films and went on to have a successful directorial career in Germany.  Eventually, he came to the U.S., where he married heiress Suzanna Love and hung out with people like Andy Warhol.  In the U.S., Lommel continued to direct.  He was responsible for some of the first documentaries about punk rock.  His film Cocaine Cowboys featured Andy Warhol playing himself.  His horror films, The Boogeyman and the Devonsville Terror, may not have been beloved by critics but they both quickly amassed cult followings.  However, after getting divorced from Love, Lommel seemingly disappeared until he reemerged in the 2000s as a director who specialized in cheap, direct-to-video true crime films.  Lommel directed films about Richard Ramirez, Son of Sam, Gary Ridgway, the Zodiac Killer, and many others.  While most critics dismissed Lommel’s later films as being exploitive trash, Lommel claimed that he was using the serial killer genre as a way to explore and expose the hypocricy of American society.

Myself, I love the idea of a crazy auteur so nothing would make me happier than to be able to declare that there was some sort of overlooked genius to Lommel’s later films.  However, from what I’ve seen of them, I have to say this is a rare case where I find myself agreeing with the critics.  For the most part, Lommel’s later films were trash.  While I have no doubt that Lommel probably was being serious in his belief that his serial killer films had a deeper meaning, the majority of them were cheaply made and dramatically incoherent.

That said, D.C. Sniper actually is one of Lommel’s better serial killer films.  A lot of that is due to the intense and intimidating performance of Ken Foree in the role of John Allen Muhammad.  Foree is credited with co-writing the script and the scenes in which he discusses his resentments while staring straight at the camera are truly frightening and they probably do capture what was going on in Muhammad’s head at the time of the killings.  The scenes between Muhammad and Lee Malvo (played by Tory N. Thompson) also have a creepy feeling of authenticity to them as we watch as Muhammad turns Malvo into a killer.  In the scenes with Thompson, Foree plays Muhammad as being alternatively nurturing and fearsome and again, one gets the feeling that the scenes are probably close to the truth.

That said, it’s still a Lommel film, which means that the budget is low, there’s a lot of meandering shots of people driving from one location to another, and the majority of the film looks like it was filmed on a phone.  When the film isn’t following Muhammad, it’s following an FBI agent (Christopher Kiesa), who is working undercover as a tourist.  The FBI agents wanders around various D.C. monuments and takes pictures.  We hear his voice-over, in which he explains that he’s more worried about his runaway daughter, who is apparently being turned into an “internet slut” by her boyfriend.  At one point, the FBI agent stands at the Potomac River and wonders if George Washington would be considered a terrorist by modern standards.  Lommel himself plays the FBI’s enigmatic partner, a detective known as the Cowboy due to his choice of headgear.  As one point, the Cowboy promises that he will help the FBI agent find his daughter.  The plotline is dropped after that and we don’t hear another word about it, leaving us to wonder why it was even brought up in the first place.

In the end, D.C. Sniper is good Lommel just because regular Lommel is so bad.

Horror Film Review: Challenge the Devil (dir by Giuseppe Vegezzi)


Oh, where to start with the 1963 Italian film?

A criminal named Carlo lands in Italy and soon finds himself being pursued a group of gangsters.  An extended shoot-out leads to Carlo being serious wounded.  Carlo stumbles into a church, where he is met by a monk who used to be an friend of his.  Carlo explains that he has been blackmailing a Beirut crime lord and now the crime lord’s men are after him.  Unfortunately, Carlo gave all the evidence to an exotic dancer and now he needs the evidence back but, obviously, he can’t show his face in the streets.  The monk goes to a nightclub and, after watching several different cabaret acts that have nothing to do with the rest of the film, he finally gets a chance to talk to the dancer.  The dancer is also an old friend of his but hasn’t seen him since he became a monk and she demands to know what led to this development in his life.  The monk tells her the story of his past, in return for her giving him the evidence.

In the distant past, the monk was a part of a motorcycle gang led by wannabe gangster Gian (Mario Polletin) and a failed poet, Gugo (Giorgio Ardisson).  One day, Gian, Gugo, the future monk, and their respective girlfriends decided to break into an apparently deserted castle, where they decided to have a wild party.  Of course, to them, a wild party meant playing the bongos and drinking wine.  However, it turned out that the castle wasn’t totally deserted.  There was an old man (Christopher Lee) living in the castle and the old man explained that the love of his life had died years before and that her body was somewhere in the castle.  If Gugo and the gang found her body and brought her to the old man so that he could give her a decent burial before his own death, the old man would give them the castle.  The greedy and drunken gang agreed but they soon discovered that the castle was full of secrets and the old man was not quite who he claimed….

Challenge The Devil is a thoroughly disjointed film, one with a plot that is almost impossible to follow.  Some of that is because of the film’s troubled production history.  Originally, the film was titled Katarsis and it was simply about the gang coming across the castle and meeting Christopher Lee.  However, after the film was shot, the production company went out of business and the film’s new owner decided to re-edit the film and tack on the scenes involving Carlo, the dancer, and the monk.  None of the new scenes fit with the style of the old scenes and, indeed, all of the nonsense with Carlo and the dancer means that the film’s main story doesn’t even get started until after about 20 minutes of filler.  Of course, it should be noted that even the original version of the film doesn’t look like it was that good.  This was director Giuseppe Vegezzi’s only feature film and he shows very little natural ability when it comes to framing shots or creating atmosphere.

But what about Christopher Lee, you may be asking.  He’s fine.  I mean, Christopher Lee is imposing and his physical presence is so strong that he even makes an impression in a bad film.  But Lee only gets a few minutes of screen time.  For his part, Lee said that this was one of the film that he did for the money and he never actually saw the finished product.  I don’t blame him.  This one is for Lee completists only.

4 Shots From 4 Films: Special Charles Band Edition


4 Shots From 4 Films is just what it says it is, 4 shots from 4 of our favorite films. As opposed to the reviews and recaps that we usually post, 4 Shots From 4 Films is all about letting the visuals do the talking.

This October, I am going to be using our 4 Shots From 4 Films feature to pay tribute to some of my favorite horror directors, in alphabetical order!  That’s right, we’re going from Argento to Zombie in one month!

Today’s director is Charles Band, the legendary founder of Full Moon Pictures!

4 Shots From 4 Charles Band Films

Meridian: Kiss of the Beast (1990, dir by Charles Band, DP: Marc Ahlberg)

The Creeps (1997, dir by Charles Band, DP: Adolfo Bartoli)

Puppet Master: The Legacy (2003, dir by Charles Band, DP: Marc Ahlberg)

Evil Bong 888: Infinity High (2022, dir by Charles Band, DP: Alex Nicolaou)

Horror Film Review: Waxwork II: Lost In Time (dir by Anthony Hickox)


1992’s Waxwork II opens with the finale of the first Waxwork.  The cursed waxwork is burning to the ground, taking out the monsters within, along with Sir Wilfred (Patrick Macnee) and Wilfred’s army of do-gooders.  Only Mark (Zach Galligan) and Sarah (now played by Monika Schnarre) are able to escape.  Fleeing the burning building, they manage to catch a cab.  Sarah wonders what they’re going to do now.  Mark replies that they’re going to go back to school and pretend that none of this ever happened.

Good luck with that!  It turns out that one other thing did escape from the waxwork.  A disembodied hand follows Sarah home and murders her abusive stepfather.  Sarah manages to drop the hand down the garbage disposal, destroying it but also destroying the only proof she had that she didn’t kill her stepfather.  Sarah is put on trial for murder and the jury does not appear to be impressed with her “It was a supernatural creature” defense.

What she and Mark need is proof that the waxwork was full of monsters.  Fortunately, a trip to Sir Wilfred’s house reveals not only a recording of Sir Wilfred explaining how there’s an alternative universe known as the Kartagra but also a compass that can be used to find portals into the Kartagra.  Mark and Sarah enter the Kartagra, searching for proof of Sarah’s innocence.

Mark and Sarah go from one universe to another, meeting iconic horror characters along the way.  Just as with the exhibits in the first film, each universe features it own set monsters and its own distinctive style.  For instance, Mark finds himself suddenly cast in the role of Henry Clerval, best friend of Baron Frankenstein (Martin Kemp) and the lover of the Baron’s wife, Elizabeth (who is actually Sarah).  Of course, the Baron has more to worry about than his wife cheating with his best friend.  There’s also the angry monster living in the basement and the angry villagers that are due to start pounding on the front doors of the mansion.

Later, Mark finds himself in a black-and-white recreation of The Haunting of Hill House, working with a researcher (Bruce Campbell) and two psychics to investigate reports of a ghost at an old house.  Mark must bring peace to the ghost while avoiding all of the slapstick complications that one might expect when Bruce Campbell shows up as a paranormal researcher.  While Mark is dealing with that, Sarah is floating in space, trying to protect the crew of her dingy spaceship from an acid spewing alien.

You get the idea.  Waxwork II is essentially an affectionate collection of homages to other, better-known horror films and it must be said that Waxwork II does an excellent job of recreating each film, from the crisp black-and-white of haunted house scene to the grittiness of the Alien sequences to the over-the-top swordplay of a trip to a medieval world.  There’s even a trip to the mall from Dawn of the Dead!  Wisely, Waxwork II doesn’t take itself particularly seriously, with many scenes developing into outright comedy.  Zach Galligan gives an enjoyable and nicely modulated comedic performance, even holding his own with Bruce Campbell.

At 104 minutes, Waxwork II runs a bit too long for its own good but it ends on a sweet note that nicely wraps up the entire saga.  It’s a film that works as both a continuation of Waxwork and as an entertaining film on its own.

Horror Film Review: Invisible Agent (dir by Edwin L. Marin)


In 1942, the world was at war and everyone, whether a soldier or a civilian, was expected to do their part for the war effort.  That included the best and the brightest of Hollywood.  Stars like Jimmy Stewart, Clark Gable, and Henry Fonda enlisted in army.  Others sold war bonds and narrated patriotic news reels.  Even the Universal monsters did their part for the war effort, with the Invisible Man becoming the Invisible Agent in the 1942 film of the same name.

Invisible Agent opens in 1940, with Frank Griffin, Jr. (Jon Hall), the grandson of the original Invisible Man, being confronted by a Nazi (Sir Cedric Hardwicke) and a Japanese spymaster (Peter Lorre) at his print shop in Manhattan.  They want his grandfather’s invisibility formula.  At first, they offer to pay him for it.  Then, when Frank refuses, they threaten to chop off his fingers.  Frank manages to escape with both his fingers and the formula.  As Frank later tells the Americans, he’s not willing to give the formula to anyone because he knows how dangerous it can be if not used properly.  As far as Frank is concerned, the formula must never be used again.  Frank does say that he might change his mind under extraordinary circumstances.

The film cuts to a series of headlines announcing that the Japanese have bombed Pearl Harbor.  The circumstances are now extraordinary and Frank agrees that it is time to use the formula for the war effort.  But he agrees to do so on the condition that only he be allowed to take the formula.  Frank becomes the Invisible Agent, taking the formula and then parachuting into Nazi Germany.  Unseen, Frank searches for information about Nazi spies in the U.S. and the details of Germany’s plan to bomb New York.  Along the way, he meets Maria Sorenson (Ilona Massey), a wealthy German woman who is lusted after by the members of the German high command but who is actually working for the Resistance.  Frank also finds himself, once again, coming across the two men who previously threatened him in New York.

Here are the positive things about this film.  Invisible Agent has an intriguing premise.  The Nazis are such monsters that even the once fearsome Universal monsters are joining the effort to take them down.  The film also features two intelligent performances from Cedric Hardwicke and Peter Lorre, both of whom bring some unexpected shadings to their villainous roles.  The opening scene in Manhattan plays out like an intense film noir and, once the action moves to Germany, director Edwin L. Marin keeps things moving at a steady pace.

Unfortunately, Invisible Agent has one huge problem that it cannot overcome.  Jon Hall gives a remarkably charmless performance in the title role, flatly delivering his lines and showing very little in the way of personality.  When you’re not seen for the majority of the film, it’s important to have a voice that’s full of personality.  That’s one reason why the previous Invisible Man films benefitted from the casting of actors like Claude Rains and Vincent Prince.  Jon Hall, on the other hand, just comes across as being dull.  He gives a boring performance, whether visible or not and, as a result, Invisible Agent falls flat in a way that the previous Invisible films did not.  There’s no real stakes in his turning invisible because there really wasn’t much to him to begin with.

Still, I thank the Invisible Agent for his service.

Previous Universal Horror Reviews:

  1. Dracula (1931)
  2. Dracula (Spanish Language Version) (1931)
  3. Frankenstein (1931)
  4. Island of Lost Souls (1932)
  5. The Mummy (1932)
  6. The Invisible Man (1933)
  7. The Bride of Frankenstein (1935)
  8. Dracula’s Daughter (1936)
  9. Son of Frankenstein (1939)
  10. The Invisible Man Returns (1940)
  11. The Wolf Man (1941)
  12. Ghost of Frankenstein (1942)
  13. Frankenstein Meets The Wolf Man (1943)
  14. Son of Dracula (1943)
  15. House of Frankenstein (1944)
  16. House of Dracula (1945) 
  17. Creature From The Black Lagoon (1954)

Horror on the Lens: Svengali (dir by Archie Mayo)


In this atmospheric film from 1931, sinister singing teacher Svengali (John Barrymore) used hypnotism to not only turn Trilby O’Ferrall (Marian Marsh) into the most popular singer in Europe but he also takes control of her mind.  Trilby’s former boyfriend, Billie (Bramwell Fletcher) attempts to break Svengali’s hold over her, with results that are …. well, you’ll have to watch the movie.

And really, you should watch the movie!  There are moments of dream-like beauty to be found in Svengali, with my favorite being an extended sequence in which the camera seems to float above the streets of Paris.  John Barrymore gives one of his best performance as Svengali, playing the role with a mix of menace and sly humor.  The film keeps you guessing as to how much of Trilby’s actions are of her own free will and how many of them are due to Svengali’s influence.

(Interestingly enough, Barrymore’s Svengali is a dead ringer for the infamous Rasputin.)

With its dark humor and its “arty” style, Svengali struggled with audiences but it has since been recognized as one of the best of the early psychological thrillers.

Enjoy!

Music Video of the Day: Candy by The Killer Barbies (2002, directed by Oliver Sommer)


Today’s music video of the day comes from the Spanish punk rock group, The Killer Barbies.  Silvia Superstar buys a comic book featuring an animated version of Dracula who starts to speak directly to her.  Not coincidentally, this video was released at the same time that the band was preparing to star in a film called Killer Barbys vs. Dracula, which was directed by Jesus Franco.

(For the film, the band changed their name from the Killer Barbies to the Killer Barbys to avoid being sued by Mattel.)

This video was directed by Oliver Sommer, who is one of the busiest and most prolific music video directors out there.  At this point, it would probably be easier to keep track of who, in Europe, Sommer has not worked with than with who he has.

Enjoy!