Quick Review: Fright Night (dir. by Craig Gillespie)


I want to say great things about Craig Gillespie’s remake of Fright Night. I want to say that it was worth seeing and it was full of awesome moments. I also wanted to be able to write this review without making so many comparisons to the 1985 Original by Tom Holland. Not that the original was a masterpiece by any means, but I dozed off (just a little) on this film.

If there’s only one reason I could give for recommending Fright Night, it would be to get a taste of what Vampires should be. Don’t read me wrong on this. I own all four Twilight books in hardcover, read them repeatedly, and have seen the three films that came out in the theatre. It’s just nice to see a vampire movie that shows vampires more as predatory creatures than sparkling A&F models.  There’s an edge to this film that’s pretty fun in a lot of ways. Both Colin Farrell and David Tennant have great roles here and even Anton Yelchin holds his own, but there’s a weird breakdown that happens. Fright Night is a good film, as long as you don’t try to make any kind of direct comparisons to the source material.

The story focuses on Charlie Brewster (Yelchin), a teenager – the story being in Vegas this time –  who discovers he has a vampire named Jerry Dandrige (Farrell) living next door to him. When the vampire confronts Charlie, Charlie is forced to seek out help in the form of Peter Vincent (Tennant) to defeat him. While there were a few scenes that really stood out for me and I found myself smiling more often than rolling my eyes, the pacing of this was off. Other audiences may find that the movie moved well. I felt like they were just throwing things to say “Well, wouldn’t it be cool if they did this, and then that.”

The two problems I had with Fright Night were it’s pacing and Chris Mintz-Plasse. Chris is fun to watch at the start, and I’d love to see him do more, but someone really has to give him something where he’s not playing the “token geek”.  While I liked the movie overall, there’s a lot of verbal exposition in the beginning of the film, as Charlie doesn’t so much discover the truth about Jerry, but is pretty much told the entire scenario he’s in about 15 minutes into the start. I had a problem with that. Again, depending on the audience, the movie may move just fine.

Fright Night is one of those films could be a love it or hate it. I’m of the audience that will probably catch it again when it’s out on video, but it doesn’t feel like anything you really have to rush to the theatre for.

3 responses to “Quick Review: Fright Night (dir. by Craig Gillespie)

  1. It wasn’t a great film by any means and it did have some characterization issues (mainly the Evil Ed and the Mom character), but overall I actually enjoyed it quite a lot. The film held up quite nicely due to the performances of Yelchin, Tennant and Farrell.

    Farrell really owned the film from start to finish. He comes off as a sort of ultimate badboy with just a hint of douchebag in him that even women couldn’t resist. Then once the film hits the second-half running he ends up like a walking shark who just devours everything.

    I like the the little winking moments to the original film like the appearance of the original Jerry.

    Also, I have to say that Imogen Poots was quite hot as Amy.

    Like

    • And that’s part of what made it so hard to write about. There were elements I liked. The discussion over the beers was a great scene and the some others. Farrell was really good, and so was Tenannt. I agree with you on Amy. I could possibly be coming down on it hard. It had it’s moments, but on an overall, it needed something (for me anyway). 🙂

      Like

  2. Pingback: What Lisa Marie Watched Last Night #93: The Woods (dir by Lucky McKee) | Through the Shattered Lens

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.