Review: Hellfire (dir. by Isaac Florentine)


“What you started here today? About to get a whole lot worse.” — Nomada

Hellfire is the kind of mid-budget, throwback action-thriller that knows exactly which bar it’s aiming for—and then mostly clears it with room to spare. Set in 1988 and built around a classic “mysterious drifter wanders into a rotten town” premise, it leans hard into familiar tropes but finds some personality in its cast, pacing, and sense of place. It’s not a game-changer for the genre, but if you’re in the mood for a lean, old-school small-town showdown, it gets the job done more often than not.

The setup is comfort food for action fans. A nameless drifter, played by Stephen Lang, rolls into the dying Southern town of Rondo, where the locals are quietly suffocating under the control of drug boss Jeremiah Whitfield, a politician-connected crime lord who pretty much owns the place. The bar owner Owen gives the drifter some work and a meal, the sheriff shows up to strongly suggest he move along, and you can basically feel the town holding its breath, waiting for somebody—anybody—to push back. That somebody, obviously, is this guy, who’s soon nicknamed Nomada and revealed to be an ex–Green Beret with a messy past and a higher capacity for violence than his weathered demeanor suggests. The story is straightforward to the point of being telegraphed, but that simplicity is part of its appeal; you always know what lane Hellfire is driving in.

Performance-wise, the movie’s biggest asset is Lang. At this point, watching him settle into the “old guy you really shouldn’t mess with” archetype is half the fun, and Hellfire plays that card well. He doesn’t oversell the trauma angle, but the film gives him just enough flashbacks and quiet beats—like those bath-time war memories—to suggest a guy who’s been stuck in fight mode for decades and doesn’t know what to do with peace. His physicality is still convincing, and director Isaac Florentine is smart about staging the action around what Lang does well, letting him move with purpose instead of pretending he’s 30 years younger. He’s not reinventing the “wandering warrior” type, but he grounds Nomada enough that you buy people trusting him even when they’re terrified. There’s a warmth under the stubble and scars that gives the character a little more dimension than the script strictly requires.

The supporting cast is a mixed bag, but the core players are solid. Harvey Keitel’s Jeremiah Whitfield is exactly the kind of villain you expect in this setup: soft-spoken, smug, and insulated by money and enforcers. He doesn’t get a ton of screen time, but there’s something appropriately gross about how casual he is with other people’s lives, like he’s already factored their suffering into his monthly budget. Dolph Lundgren shows up as the corrupt sheriff Wiley, playing the heavy who’s technically the law but functionally just another thug with a badge. Lundgren brings some weary menace to the role, and there’s a nice little tension in how much he’s genuinely bought into Jeremiah’s world versus how much he’s just too compromised to get out. Scottie Thompson’s Lena, Owen’s daughter, is the emotional anchor; she’s the one with something real to lose, and while the film doesn’t push her arc especially far, she’s likable enough that you care when things go sideways.

On the weaker end, Michael Sirow turns in a caricature performance as Spencer, the entitled and whiny son of Jeremiah, all sneers and petulance that feels like it stepped straight out of a ’80s cartoon villain playbook without any nuance to back it up. Similarly, Johnny Yong Bosch as enforcer Zeke sleepwalks through every scene that isn’t action, delivering a by-the-numbers performance for a character supposed to be the crime boss’ dangerous right-hand man; even in the fights, it’s rote and uninspired, missing the edge that could’ve made Zeke a real threat.

On the character side, Hellfire actually does a bit more groundwork than you might expect from what is essentially a B-movie revenge Western in modern dress. The early stretch spends time letting you feel the town’s exhaustion and fear—bars that are half-empty, people looking over their shoulders, everyone resigned to Jeremiah’s stranglehold. That world-building pays off once the violence kicks in, because it’s clear what’s at stake beyond simple body count or spectacle. The film also tries to deepen Nomada’s backstory, hinting at survivor’s guilt and a lingering sense that he’s been wandering from one moral debt to another, but it never quite connects those dots in a satisfying way. By the time the movie starts circling around for a full-circle emotional payoff, you can see what it’s going for, yet the groundwork feels a little thin, like pages were cut or ideas left half-developed.

Pacing-wise, Hellfire is tighter than its 95-ish-minute runtime might imply, and that’s mostly a compliment. The first half is surprisingly light on action, preferring to simmer instead of boil; you get a few scuffles and tense stand-offs, but Florentine holds back on the big fireworks. When things finally explode—hostages, ambushes, warehouses, the works—the film shifts into a mode that feels like controlled chaos, mixing gunfights, hand-to-hand scraps, and vehicle beats with a clarity that’s increasingly rare in this budget range. The trade-off is that the final act feels a bit rushed, like the movie suddenly remembered it had to tie off multiple arcs and body the main villains within a fairly strict time limit. The last stretch does what you expect it to do, including Jeremiah’s fiery fate, but it doesn’t linger long enough to fully earn the emotional weight it’s shooting for.

The action itself sits in that “serviceable to occasionally inspired” space. Florentine, coming from a background in stunt-heavy genre work, keeps things clean and legible; you always know who’s shooting at whom and from where. The shootouts can get cheesy—there’s a bit of that “nobody can hit anyone until the plot needs it” energy—but there are also flashes where staging and geography line up to deliver genuinely satisfying beats. A warehouse sequence where Nomada protects Lena while taking out multiple attackers is a standout, capturing both his tactical skill and the desperation of the situation. The film clearly favors quality over volume; genre die-hards who want wall-to-wall mayhem might wish for more set pieces, but the ones you get mostly land. If anything, some of the tonal shifts—bouncing from grim brutality to borderline goofy machismo—don’t always mesh perfectly, though that’s also kind of baked into the retro B-movie DNA.

Visually, Hellfire doesn’t reinvent the wheel, but it looks better than a lot of its DTV-adjacent peers. Shot in Arkansas and set in the late ’80s, it leans into dusty small-town Americana: sun-faded storefronts, weathered bars, lonely roads. Ross W. Clarkson’s cinematography keeps things grounded, with an emphasis on practical locations and natural light that makes the town feel like an actual lived-in place rather than a backlot abstraction. The period setting isn’t showy—you’re not constantly being smacked with nostalgia props—but it subtly shapes the world, especially in how isolated and cut-off Rondo feels without modern communication and surveillance everywhere. The score by Stephen Edwards does what it needs to do, nudging tension along without ever becoming a character in its own right.

Where the film stumbles is mostly in how predictable and occasionally clumsy it can be. You can see many of the beats coming from miles away: the town’s breaking point, the betrayals, who will die to motivate whom. There is one darker turn that genuinely catches you off guard, and it helps shake the movie out of its comfort zone for a bit, but the script overall is content to color inside the genre lines. Some dialogue leans on cliché, and a few supporting characters feel like they wandered in from a rougher first draft—the kind of broad sketches you’ve seen a dozen times before. It’s never bad enough to sink things, but it does cap how high Hellfire can climb; this is a movie that’s satisfied with solid rather than special.

Still, taken on its own terms, Hellfire works. It gives Stephen Lang a solid platform to do what he does best, surrounds him with a fun mix of seasoned character actors, and delivers enough muscular, clearly shot action to justify the ticket or rental. The town feels real enough that you actually care whether Nomada cleans it up, and the film respects the basics: clear stakes, likable underdogs, villains you’re happy to see go down in flames. If you go in expecting a tight, modest, R-rated throwback with a few rough edges and a couple of standout moments rather than a new genre benchmark, you’ll probably come away satisfied. It’s generic, sure—but it’s the kind of generic that remembers to give you characters to root for, action you can actually see, and just enough personality to make the ride worth taking.

October True Crime: Chapter 27 (dir by J.P. Schaefer)


On December 8th, 1980, John Lennon was shot and killed in New York City by a man named Mark David Chapman.

While much has been written about John Lennon and his life and his beliefs, Mark David Chapman, serving a life sentence and rarely giving interviews, has always remained more of an enigma.  What exactly motivated him to shoot John Lennon remains a mystery.  At the time of the shooting, Chapman was carrying a copy of Catcher In The Rye and some accounts insist that Chapman believed himself to be Holden Caulfield or that he shot Lennon to try to bring more attention to the book.  Depending on which source you go to, Chapman was either a Beatles superfan or he was someone who rarely listened to rock ‘n’ roll.  Chapman either worshipped Lennon or he was offended by Lennon’s flippant remark about the Beatles being bigger than Jesus.  Some people claim that Chapman was looking for fame by killing someone famous.  Others claim that Lennon was not even Chapman’s main target and Chapman, in one of the few interviews that he did give, listed a long list of targets — including several other celebrities and politicians — that he considered going after at one point or another.

If anything, Mark David Chapman would appear to be a lot like Arthur Bremer, the directionless drifter who seriously wounded Governor George Wallace in 1972 and whose diary inspired Paul Schrader to create the character of Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver.  Like Chapman, Arthur Bremer traveled the country without apparent direction.  Like Chapman, Bremer considered many different targets before settling on Wallace.  And like Chapman, Bremer gave a lot of conflicting reasons for his actions.  One gets the feeling that neither Chapman nor Bremer (nor a lot of other assassins) really understood why they were driven to kill (or, in Bremer’s case, attempt to kill) so they grasped at whatever solution seemed to convenient at the time.  Apparently, anything was preferable to just admitting to being a severely damaged human being.

2007’s Chapter 27, follows Mark David Chapman (played by Jared Leto) as he travels to Manhattan and spends several days camped outside of the famous Dakota Apartment Building, hoping to see John Lennon (played by Mark Lindsay Chapman, who reportedly missed out on an earlier opportunity to play Lennon because he shared the same name as Lennon’s assassin).  The film is narrated by Mark David Chapman, who tries to talk tough just like Holden Caulfield but who can’t hide the fact that he’s basically just a fat loser who has no idea how to communicate with any of the other people that he meets in New York.  He creeps out a friendly groupie (played by Lindsay Lohan).  He gets into an argument with a photographer (Judah Friedlander).  He annoys countless Dakota doormen.  About the only person who isn’t annoyed by Chapman is Lennon himself, who politely signs an autograph just a few hours before Chapman shoots him in the back.

It’s a well-made and well-directed film and Jared Leto gives a memorably creepy performance as Mark David Chapman.  (That said, the accent that he uses while speaking as Chapman once again proves the danger of giving a method actor any role that involves a Southern accent.)  Leto gained a good deal of weight to Chapman and he’s thoroughly believable as a very familiar type of obsessive fan.  That said, the film still can’t make Chapman into a particularly compelling character because there’s really nothing compelling about someone like Mark David Chapman.  The man he killed was compelling, regardless of what you may think about the politics of a song like Imagine.  But Chapman himself was just a fat loser.  Leto does a good job of portraying Chapman as being a fat loser but it’s still hard to watch the film without wondering what the point of it all is.  We don’t need a movie to tell us that Mark David Chapman was a loser.

At its best, the film creates a sense of claustrophobia.  Almost the entire film is told from Chapman’s point of view and the best moments are the ones where Chapman finds himself overwhelmed by 1980s New York.  It’s a film that does inspire one to consider how strange it is that someone like Mark David Chapman could change the course of the culture through one deadly action.  (The film did cause me to think about how different things would have been if Chapman had boarded a Greyhound and left New York without returning to the Dakota that night.)  But, in the end, the film cannot answer the question of why Chapman did what he did.  Perhaps that’s because there really is no answer, beyond the randomness of fate and the dangers of fame.

Catching Up With The Films of 2022: Wrong Place (dir by Mike Burns)


After his wife is killed in a car crash, former police chief Frank Richards (Bruce Willis) takes a job as a security guard for a small town convenience store.  It’s not really a demanding job.  As we see in one montage, Frank spends most of his time playing solitaire.  However, one evening, Frank steps out back to have a cigar and he just happens to catch meth dealer Virgil Brown (Massi Furlan) executing a man.  Frank promptly disarms and arrest Virgil.

Virgil’s son, Jake (Michael Sirow), is not happy about this.  Knowing that Frank is the only eyewitness who can testify against Virgil at his trail, Jake heads off to kill Frank.  However, when Jake arrives at Frank’s cabin, he discovers that it is inhabited by Frank’s daughter, Chloe (Ashley Greene), and her girlfriend, Tammy (Stacey Danger).  Jake tries to take Chloe and Tammy hostage but Chloe turns out to be a lot tougher than he assumed.  Chloe is waiting to hear whether or not she’s cancer-free and, as she explains to Jake, she has nothing to lose by risking her life and fighting him.  And while Jake is certainly dangerous and quick to fire his gun, he’s also not the most competent criminal to ever come out of the backwoods of Alabama.  If you’re guessing that this leads to several scenes of various characters chasing each other through the woods and shooting at each other, congratulations!  You’re right!

This was one of the last films that Willis made before announcing his retirement last year.  Watching the film, it’s easy to see that Willis was struggling a bit.  There’s none of the swagger that viewers typically associate with Bruce Willis and he delivers many of his lines in a flat monotone.  That said, this film is still a better showcase for Willis than American Siege or Fortress: Sniper’s Eye.  Indeed, in the early scenes with his soon-to-be-deceased wife, Willis feels a bit like the Willis of old.  Even if Bruce Willis was struggling to remember his lines, his eyes still revealed a lot of emotional depth.  In the scenes where he and his wife discuss getting older and mention how scary it is to be sick, the dialogue carries an extra resonance.  If nothing else, the role of a decent man who will do anything to protect his family seems like a more appropriate final role for Willis than the various crime bosses that he played in some of his other ’22 films.

Unfortunately, Wrong Place gets bogged down with the whole hostage subplot.  There’s only so much time that you can spend watching people yell at each other before you lose interest.  Ashley Greene, Stacey Danger, and Michael Sirow all give convincing performances but the film itself falls into a rut.  When Jake is first introduced, he seems like he could be an interesting villain.  He doesn’t really know what he’s doing but he’s determined to impress his father.  (Sadly, it’s pretty obvious that Jake’s father will never be impressed with anything Jake does, regardless of what it may be.)  Jake’s incompetence makes him even more dangerous because it also makes him impulsive and quick to anger.  Unfortunately, the film doesn’t do much with his character.  Once the action kicks in, he just become another generic backwoods villain.

I get the feeling that the director meant for Wrong Place to be more than just another action film.  The film moves at its own deliberate pace and, even after the hostage situation has concluded, the film still goes on for another ten minutes.  One gets the feeling that the director wanted to make a sensitive film about the relationship between a headstrong daughter and her old-fashioned father.  But, because this film was also a low-budget action film, he also had to toss in some backwoods meth dealers.  The film has some moments of unexpected emotional honesty, many of them curtesy of Ashley Greene.  But, in the end, it keeps getting bogged down with endless scenes of people running through the woods with guns.  The end result is an uneven film but at least Willis gets to play a hero again.