I’ll be honest — I’ve never played the apparently-insanely-popular Batman : Arkham City video game — or any Batman-related video game, for that matter As far as I understand it, though, the idea behind it is that there’s been a jailbreak of some sort at Arkham Asylum and all the “lunatic” criminals — uhhhmmmm — “housed” there are now loose on the streets of Gotham.
Neat idea, and it seems to be catching, as there’s an Arkham City comic book mini-series being published by DC as we speak. Wonder where they got it the concept from in the first place? Oh yeah — it was the central plot conceit in the third act of Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins, although the video game, apparently, ups the ante quite considerably.
All of which leads us, in an admittedly rather roundabout way, to the subject of today’s “What I’d Do Next With The Who ‘Batman’ Movie Franchise” thing, namely — which specific plot points and/or characters from Nolan’s trilogy would I keep in the franchise’s inevitable relaunch (which, if you’ll recall, is going to be of the “soft” variety)? Well, let’s take a look at precisely that —
As preamble, let me state that I need, once again, to beg your indulgence, dear reader, for a day or so here because all I’m going to do here today is give you a laundry list of the specific items I’d keep, but not go so far as to explain why. Fear not, though, the why is coming — and in detail! — over the next several days as I lay out in detail the specific plotline I have in mind for the new hypothetical trilogy we’re planning here (we did, in fact, decide it was going to be another trilogy a few weeks back, remember? I wouldn’t blame you if you didn’t). So here’s what I’d keep, and tomorrow I’ll start in on why I’m keeping this stuff — or rather, my plot outline should, if its communicated even semi-coherently (always a gamble with me) demonstrate on its face this “why” factor I’m harping on about.
Needless to say, the “Arkham jailbreak” idea makes the cut. I have no desire to have it be on as grand a scale as the video game probably depicts, or even as grand as Nolan’s original iteration of the event, but it’s gonna be in there, as is the guy who was behind it in the movie, Dr. Jonathan Crane, aka The Scarecrow, although in somewhat reduced form. I like The Scarecrow. I like the whole “fear gas” thing. I think it worked, and can work again, albeit with a different spin, I think, on things. And speaking of villains —
My hypothetical new trilogy will, indeed, feature many of the same principal baddies as Nolan’s films. I’m thinking, specifically, that in addition to The Scarecrow, we’ll be looking at Harve “Two-Face” Dent again, in a dramatically expanded role, Ra’s Al Ghul in a somewhat reduced role (and not until the second film), The Joker is an essentially similar role (lead villain in the second film), and Catwoman in, like Two-Face, a very much expanded role. In fact, as I’m looking at things right now, but Harvey Dent and Selina Kyle will feature prominently in all three imaginary (sigh) films of our imaginary (sigh again) trilogy.
As for what else I’d keep from the Nolan flicks, I’m thinking the idea of a somewhat younger Bruce Wayne (at least to start with) is a keeper, as are supporting cast members Lucius Fox, corrupt cop Lieutenant Flass, and, of course, Alfred Pennyworth and Jim Gordon. There will be differences in how they’re depicted, though, that range from the subtle to the radically different.
I guess that’s what we call a bit of a “teaser” for the next installment in this series of posts, isn’t it? Well, rest assured, friends, I’m on a definite roll here (even if it’s only in my own mind), and part seven of this ever-evolving thang will go up at some point tomorrow, barring unforeseen calamity of some sort, knock wood.I hope to see you back here then as I begin to take these pieces, add in some others (naturally), and then show you just how I think this whole unwieldy jigsaw should be put together.

Reblogged this on Trash Film Guru and commented:
More from my ongoing series for Through The Shattered Lens —
LikeLike
Interesting. I’d abandon the notion of “trilogies” that modern super hero movies have gotten hung on, in favor for stand alone films that altogether abandon the notion of “origin stories.” Batman is a pop cultural icon, knowing who he is should be a prerequisite to buying a ticket.
Making the films more similar to the James Bond series. He for a time had a stable villainous organization to fight, but each was stand-alone. So much so that I believe they filmed “Thunder Ball” twice and no one in the box office noticed! Interesting villain, fight, repeat = 45,000 successful 007 films.
It’s also interesting resurrecting many of Nolan’s villains; especially in light of the previous post. I’d figure using second-tier villain would work out better for filmmakers, as with less backstory, you’d have more artistic freedom.
LikeLike
Yeah, “Thunderball” was essentially made twice — “Never Say Never Again” is an uncredited remake of it. And the (thankfully) abandoned third Dalton Bond film, which was simply going to be called “007,” was going to be yet another “Thunderball” remake.
I tried to outline my “reasoning,” such as it is, behind a trilogy in a previous post in this series — and my plot structure definitely features some new, second-tier-style villains — and no Bane. In any case, keep checking in and letting me know what you think as we go along here, I definitely appreciate your input. regardless of whether we agree or disagree!
LikeLike
I agree on using some of Bat’s second-tier villains especially those that utilize more of Bat’s detective skills.
I know some people think using the Riddler would be too cartoony, but I’ve always seen Edward Nigma as something akin to Hannibal Lecter. Their two extremely intelligent and even more egotistical that they would pose tests and leave clues behind that could implicate them.
If one took the Jim Carrey caricature of the character out of the equation and used the Batman animation as a guide then that’s a villain that would make for a Batman film that was cat-and-mouse thriller instead of an action film.
LikeLike
I’ve seen others make that very same suggestion. While I like the idea, I have to admit the Riddler doesn’t fit into my plans, but my ideal version of the Joker is much less “hard-core” than the Ledger version, as will hopefully become clear —
LikeLike
Awwww, come on! He could make for a kick ass intellectual serial killer/mass murderer/thrill killer. 😀
LikeLike
he could/ but large-scale murder has never been The Riddler’s style, and frankly I’d be loathe to see any of Batman’s hisorical “Rogues’ Gallery” become any darker than they already have. Leave us some level of innocence, please!
LikeLike